Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

ELON MUSK: "OpenAI have what's called human reinforcement learning, which is another way of saying that they have a whole bunch of people that look at the output of ChatGPT and then say whether that's okay or not okay. Essentially they are training the AI to lie."

DogeDesigner

1,890,807 subscribers

118,646 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 ELON MUSK: "Without freedom of speech, people can not make informed vote. If people are simply fed propaganda and have no access to what's really going on, then they don't have a real democracy. That's why I say that free speech is the bedrock of Democracy."

🚨 ELON MUSK: "Without freedom of speech, people can not make informed vote. If people are simply fed propaganda and have no access to what's really going on, then they don't have a real democracy. That's why I say that free speech is the bedrock of Democracy."

DogeDesigner

54,136 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk on how his actions unintentionally accelerated AI: “I guess the only thing we can try to do is minimize the probability of a bad outcome. For the longest time, I declined to participate in AI. I created OpenAI essentially as a counterweight to Google because, at the time, they were more or less a monopoly on AI. Then Anthropic spun out of OpenAI. If anything, it seems like my actions have really accelerated AI. I wasn’t aiming to accelerate AI, but creating OpenAI, and then having Anthropic spin out of it, resulted in knock-on effects that accelerated AI, which wasn’t really my intention. It just seems like all roads lead to the acceleration of AI. So then I’m like, okay, you can either be sad about it or join the club.”

Elon Musk on how his actions unintentionally accelerated AI: “I guess the only thing we can try to do is minimize the probability of a bad outcome. For the longest time, I declined to participate in AI. I created OpenAI essentially as a counterweight to Google because, at the time, they were more or less a monopoly on AI. Then Anthropic spun out of OpenAI. If anything, it seems like my actions have really accelerated AI. I wasn’t aiming to accelerate AI, but creating OpenAI, and then having Anthropic spin out of it, resulted in knock-on effects that accelerated AI, which wasn’t really my intention. It just seems like all roads lead to the acceleration of AI. So then I’m like, okay, you can either be sad about it or join the club.”

DogeDesigner

33,625 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

The Money Guys react to Elon Musk saying you WON’T need to save for retirement with AI Elon: "You won't need to save for retirement. If any of the things we've said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant." The Money Guys: “We could move in that direction and he could absolutely be right. And so what do you end up with? You end up with a lot of people that saved a whole bunch of wealth or prepared for a thing that perhaps they did not have to be prepared for. But he's saying 10 or 20 years down the line, what's the other side of that coin? The other side of the coin is that it doesn't manifest exactly the way that he says.”

The Money Guys react to Elon Musk saying you WON’T need to save for retirement with AI Elon: "You won't need to save for retirement. If any of the things we've said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant." The Money Guys: “We could move in that direction and he could absolutely be right. And so what do you end up with? You end up with a lot of people that saved a whole bunch of wealth or prepared for a thing that perhaps they did not have to be prepared for. But he's saying 10 or 20 years down the line, what's the other side of that coin? The other side of the coin is that it doesn't manifest exactly the way that he says.”

The Iced Coffee Hour

25,411 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

ELON: AIs NEED CONSISTENCY OR THEY GO INSANE “There just needs to be consistency. If it's okay to have, let's say, black, or Asian, or Indian pride, it should be okay to have white pride, too. That's just a consistency question. If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of, I guess, all religions—as long as part of that religion is not exterminating people who are not in that religion. It's really just ensuring consistency to eliminate bias. So, if it's possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race. Arguing against that is a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane.” Source: Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience Joe Rogan, October 31, 2025

ELON: AIs NEED CONSISTENCY OR THEY GO INSANE “There just needs to be consistency. If it's okay to have, let's say, black, or Asian, or Indian pride, it should be okay to have white pride, too. That's just a consistency question. If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of, I guess, all religions—as long as part of that religion is not exterminating people who are not in that religion. It's really just ensuring consistency to eliminate bias. So, if it's possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race. Arguing against that is a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane.” Source: Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience Joe Rogan, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

128,433 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

ELON: AIs NEED CONSISTENCY OR THEY GO INSANE “There just needs to be consistency. If it's okay to have, let's say, black, or Asian, or Indian pride, it should be okay to have white pride, too. That's just a consistency question. If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of, I guess, all religions—as long as part of that religion is not exterminating people who are not in that religion. It's really just ensuring consistency to eliminate bias. So, if it's possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race. Arguing against that is a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane.” Source: Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience Joe Rogan, October 31, 2025

ELON: AIs NEED CONSISTENCY OR THEY GO INSANE “There just needs to be consistency. If it's okay to have, let's say, black, or Asian, or Indian pride, it should be okay to have white pride, too. That's just a consistency question. If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of, I guess, all religions—as long as part of that religion is not exterminating people who are not in that religion. It's really just ensuring consistency to eliminate bias. So, if it's possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race. Arguing against that is a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane.” Source: Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience Joe Rogan, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

49,143 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Elon Musk: We should look at each expenditure and ask, is this actually in the best interest of the people? “If your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible and frugal manner, then that's not okay. Your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on things that matter to the people. I mean, it's just common sense. It's not draconian or radical. I think it's really just saying, let's look at each of these expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of the people? If it is, it's approved. If it's not, we should think about it.” Press Conference at the White House, February 11, 2025

Elon Musk: We should look at each expenditure and ask, is this actually in the best interest of the people? “If your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible and frugal manner, then that's not okay. Your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on things that matter to the people. I mean, it's just common sense. It's not draconian or radical. I think it's really just saying, let's look at each of these expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of the people? If it is, it's approved. If it's not, we should think about it.” Press Conference at the White House, February 11, 2025

ELON CLIPS

16,222 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk on the rapid advancement of AI and robotics "I'm confident that if AI and robotics continue to advance which they are advancing very rapidly working will be optional, and people will have any goods and services that they want" AI and robotics are advancing so fast that, eventually, they could satisfy nearly every human need. At that point, abundance becomes the default, and the real question is no longer about production, but purpose "There is a limit people can only eat so much food. But I think if you can think of it, you can have it in the future"

Elon Musk on the rapid advancement of AI and robotics "I'm confident that if AI and robotics continue to advance which they are advancing very rapidly working will be optional, and people will have any goods and services that they want" AI and robotics are advancing so fast that, eventually, they could satisfy nearly every human need. At that point, abundance becomes the default, and the real question is no longer about production, but purpose "There is a limit people can only eat so much food. But I think if you can think of it, you can have it in the future"

X Freeze

756,817 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

ELON CLIPS

17,166 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Ohhh my god. Look at the ‘Like Count’ on this video On mainstream media CBS, over 620,000 Likes in 24 hours on Elon Musk telling reporters: This time, the American People are going to get what they voted for Support is MASSIVE for Elon Musk and DOGE “They say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non-transparent way. What's your response to that criticism?” Elon Musk “Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump won the house and won the Senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally the people voted for, for major government reform and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And, and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.”

Ohhh my god. Look at the ‘Like Count’ on this video On mainstream media CBS, over 620,000 Likes in 24 hours on Elon Musk telling reporters: This time, the American People are going to get what they voted for Support is MASSIVE for Elon Musk and DOGE “They say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non-transparent way. What's your response to that criticism?” Elon Musk “Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump won the house and won the Senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally the people voted for, for major government reform and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And, and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.”

Wall Street Apes

10,470,011 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.David Sacks reads shocking poll numbers showing that 50% of liberals believe murdering Trump or Musk is justified. “There was a study... They asked about whether the murder of Donald Trump or Elon Musk could be justified. 50% of left of center said yes... Then they asked about destroying Tesla dealerships in protests, whether that could be justified. And roughly 60% of left of center said yes.” “And so you see it now in the data that there is a generation of young liberals... who believe that the other side is so hateful that it’s okay to use violence against them.”

.David Sacks reads shocking poll numbers showing that 50% of liberals believe murdering Trump or Musk is justified. “There was a study... They asked about whether the murder of Donald Trump or Elon Musk could be justified. 50% of left of center said yes... Then they asked about destroying Tesla dealerships in protests, whether that could be justified. And roughly 60% of left of center said yes.” “And so you see it now in the data that there is a generation of young liberals... who believe that the other side is so hateful that it’s okay to use violence against them.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

217,964 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

79,111 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

ELON: THE ECONOMY IS NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME “I think generally, people should always be wary that they may have, either consciously, or perhaps mostly subconsciously, internalized the notion of a zero-sum game, or a fixed pie. And if you internalize that, everything is zero-sum, meaning in order for me to get ahead, someone else has to not get ahead or for me to have stuff, someone else must not have stuff, if you have that axiomatic flow, then what it needs to be done is to fix that axiomatic flow, because it is false. It's not a zero-sum game. We can absolutely grow, and have grown, and the evidence is overwhelming, that we have grown the output of goods and services. We have many things today that we did not have in the past. We are far more prosperous. All of humanity is far more prosperous today than it was at times in the past.” European Jewish Association, 2024, Elon Musk

ELON: THE ECONOMY IS NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME “I think generally, people should always be wary that they may have, either consciously, or perhaps mostly subconsciously, internalized the notion of a zero-sum game, or a fixed pie. And if you internalize that, everything is zero-sum, meaning in order for me to get ahead, someone else has to not get ahead or for me to have stuff, someone else must not have stuff, if you have that axiomatic flow, then what it needs to be done is to fix that axiomatic flow, because it is false. It's not a zero-sum game. We can absolutely grow, and have grown, and the evidence is overwhelming, that we have grown the output of goods and services. We have many things today that we did not have in the past. We are far more prosperous. All of humanity is far more prosperous today than it was at times in the past.” European Jewish Association, 2024, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

1,682,405 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Who Won? Elon Musk Debates Don Lemon Over the Impact of DEI Programs Lemon repeatedly said, “There’s no evidence” that DEI programs are lowering medical standards, a comment Elon Musk believes is a “false statement.” Who is right? Musk calls on Community Notes to settle the score. LEMON: “There was a repost of Ben Shapiro that you claim that DEI is killing people. Specifically, you point to medicine. You claim that DEI programs are putting people at risk. Do you really believe this to be true? And what evidence do you have to support it?” MUSK: “What I was referring to there was that if we lower the standards for doctors, if the test for a doctor is lowered, then the probability of them making a mistake and killing someone is obviously going to be higher.” LEMON: “Wait, say that again. I’m not sure I understand what you said. I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.” MUSK: “Yes. If the status for passing medical exams and becoming a doctor, especially something like a surgeon, if the standards are lowered, then the probability that the surgeon will make a mistake is higher. They’re making mistakes in their exam. They may make mistakes with people — and that may result in people dying.” LEMON: “What evidence do you have, though, that they’re lowering the standards? There is no evidence of that.” MUSK: “I believe there is.” LEMON: “There’s no evidence of that, Elon. What is the evidence?” MUSK: “I believe they have literally lowered the standards at Duke University, and that is what the article was referring to. You are saying they have not lowered the standards?” LEMON: “There’s no evidence about lowering standards. And I think that there is —” MUSK: “I believe that is a false statement you’re making.” LEMON: “Okay, well, we’ll figure it out.” MUSK: “The interesting thing is, when this is posted on the X platform, there will be a whole bunch of things that rebut what you said and what I said. And so people can then make their own decision, based on the replies and the rebuttals and the community notes.”

Who Won? Elon Musk Debates Don Lemon Over the Impact of DEI Programs Lemon repeatedly said, “There’s no evidence” that DEI programs are lowering medical standards, a comment Elon Musk believes is a “false statement.” Who is right? Musk calls on Community Notes to settle the score. LEMON: “There was a repost of Ben Shapiro that you claim that DEI is killing people. Specifically, you point to medicine. You claim that DEI programs are putting people at risk. Do you really believe this to be true? And what evidence do you have to support it?” MUSK: “What I was referring to there was that if we lower the standards for doctors, if the test for a doctor is lowered, then the probability of them making a mistake and killing someone is obviously going to be higher.” LEMON: “Wait, say that again. I’m not sure I understand what you said. I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.” MUSK: “Yes. If the status for passing medical exams and becoming a doctor, especially something like a surgeon, if the standards are lowered, then the probability that the surgeon will make a mistake is higher. They’re making mistakes in their exam. They may make mistakes with people — and that may result in people dying.” LEMON: “What evidence do you have, though, that they’re lowering the standards? There is no evidence of that.” MUSK: “I believe there is.” LEMON: “There’s no evidence of that, Elon. What is the evidence?” MUSK: “I believe they have literally lowered the standards at Duke University, and that is what the article was referring to. You are saying they have not lowered the standards?” LEMON: “There’s no evidence about lowering standards. And I think that there is —” MUSK: “I believe that is a false statement you’re making.” LEMON: “Okay, well, we’ll figure it out.” MUSK: “The interesting thing is, when this is posted on the X platform, there will be a whole bunch of things that rebut what you said and what I said. And so people can then make their own decision, based on the replies and the rebuttals and the community notes.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5,539,073 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Mike Vrabel on whether he finds Cam Newton calling the #Patriots “fool’s gold” weird: “No… We are okay with that. I promise you, we are okay with anything that anybody says... People are gonna have something to say… None of that is offensive at all.” (🎥 The Greg Hill Show)

Mike Vrabel on whether he finds Cam Newton calling the #Patriots “fool’s gold” weird: “No… We are okay with that. I promise you, we are okay with anything that anybody says... People are gonna have something to say… None of that is offensive at all.” (🎥 The Greg Hill Show)

Carlos A. Lopez

1,700,867 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Elon Musk: The cumulative voice of the people should decide what's newsworthy. “In times past, we didn't have the technology for this, so the only way to learn news was for it to be filtered through a small number of news organizations and then to be printed in newspapers or broadcast. There wasn't really any way that people could speak to each other or communicate with each other. But now there is, because people can be online. I'm a big believer in citizen journalism being actually way better. At first, citizen journalism may sound like, well, doesn't that mean just a whole bunch of amateurs are doing journalism? No, actually, it's way better because if you have actual experts in the field saying things that's way better than a journalist, if you have people who are actually at the event, live. Look at the attempted assassination of President Trump, people actually at the event live, doing video, people are reporting it. That's the kind of thing that is actually far better information than filtering it through a small number of publications, which ends up being controlled by maybe five editors-in-chief. There's like five people that control the news. And even though there are multiple newspapers, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, a few others, they decide what is newsworthy. But that should not be how it works. It should be the voice of the people, the cumulative voice of the people should decide what is newsworthy.” Philadelphia, October 18, 2024

Elon Musk: The cumulative voice of the people should decide what's newsworthy. “In times past, we didn't have the technology for this, so the only way to learn news was for it to be filtered through a small number of news organizations and then to be printed in newspapers or broadcast. There wasn't really any way that people could speak to each other or communicate with each other. But now there is, because people can be online. I'm a big believer in citizen journalism being actually way better. At first, citizen journalism may sound like, well, doesn't that mean just a whole bunch of amateurs are doing journalism? No, actually, it's way better because if you have actual experts in the field saying things that's way better than a journalist, if you have people who are actually at the event, live. Look at the attempted assassination of President Trump, people actually at the event live, doing video, people are reporting it. That's the kind of thing that is actually far better information than filtering it through a small number of publications, which ends up being controlled by maybe five editors-in-chief. There's like five people that control the news. And even though there are multiple newspapers, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, a few others, they decide what is newsworthy. But that should not be how it works. It should be the voice of the people, the cumulative voice of the people should decide what is newsworthy.” Philadelphia, October 18, 2024

ELON CLIPS

20,819,970 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

David Sacks breaks down SpaceX's path to $100 billion ARR by EOY: "The Starship test flight was successful... The heat shield worked. That's going to enable more flights of Starship now at a more accelerated rate." "That paves the way for the V3 satellite, which enables much more bandwidth for the Starlink network and the whole direct-to-cell play." "I think they said they expected to go from 1.4 gigawatts of compute to about 2 by EOY... $30 to $50 billion per gigawatt, and I think they are at the high end of that now." "When Elon says we're going to end the year at $100 billion of ARR, all you have to believe is that they are at 2 gigawatts of compute at $50 billion per gigawatt." "That doesn't include Starlink or the launch business or Grok + Cursor or any of these things, so I think that's why they are so optimistic." Elon Musk David Sacks The All-In Podcast

David Sacks breaks down SpaceX's path to $100 billion ARR by EOY: "The Starship test flight was successful... The heat shield worked. That's going to enable more flights of Starship now at a more accelerated rate." "That paves the way for the V3 satellite, which enables much more bandwidth for the Starlink network and the whole direct-to-cell play." "I think they said they expected to go from 1.4 gigawatts of compute to about 2 by EOY... $30 to $50 billion per gigawatt, and I think they are at the high end of that now." "When Elon says we're going to end the year at $100 billion of ARR, all you have to believe is that they are at 2 gigawatts of compute at $50 billion per gigawatt." "That doesn't include Starlink or the launch business or Grok + Cursor or any of these things, so I think that's why they are so optimistic." Elon Musk David Sacks The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

64,368 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

ELON MUSK: “The whole point of acquiring Twitter was to restore the voice of the people… they suspended a sitting president, which is insane”

ELON MUSK: “The whole point of acquiring Twitter was to restore the voice of the people… they suspended a sitting president, which is insane”

America

1,698,118 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

American feed manufacturers are now adding synthetic additives to chicken feed to change the yolk color This turns the color of the yolk orange and makes the eggs look like they have been grass fed on a farm “The industry uses something called xanthophyll, which is a feed additive. — That can make that yolk any color they want. So, whether the birds have lived out on green grass or they've never stepped foot outside, I can produce an or a yolk that's orange” “So then a lot of people are cracking this yolk open. They're like, oh, look at this beautiful orange yolk. And I'm like, that's not that's not orange because the birds are outside. That's from a a feed additive” Even when you try to be healthy in America, you can’t

American feed manufacturers are now adding synthetic additives to chicken feed to change the yolk color This turns the color of the yolk orange and makes the eggs look like they have been grass fed on a farm “The industry uses something called xanthophyll, which is a feed additive. — That can make that yolk any color they want. So, whether the birds have lived out on green grass or they've never stepped foot outside, I can produce an or a yolk that's orange” “So then a lot of people are cracking this yolk open. They're like, oh, look at this beautiful orange yolk. And I'm like, that's not that's not orange because the birds are outside. That's from a a feed additive” Even when you try to be healthy in America, you can’t

Wall Street Apes

819,947 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce