Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Elon Musk reduced the oldest question in human history to basic math. No one has found a flaw in it. Musk: “What are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before.” You don’t need a physics degree to follow it. You need...

r0ck3t23's profile picture

Dustin

37,958 subscribers

172,200 Aufrufe • vor 23 Stunden •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieGaming
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

ELON MUSK: Video games will be indistinguishable from reality "If you look at the evolution of video games, in my lifetime it's gone from very simple video games, like Pong, where you've got two rectangles in a square just batting it back and forth, to photorealistic, real-time games with millions of people playing simultaneously. That's happened just in the span of 50 years So if that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality We're also going to have very intelligent characters, like non-player characters, in these video games. Think of how sophisticated the conversations are you can have with an AI today, and that's only going to get more sophisticated. You'll be able to have conversations that are more complex and sophisticated than almost any human conversation So then the future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions, of photorealistic, indistinguishable-from-reality video games. With characters in those video games that are very deep, and where the dialogue is not pre-programmed. That's for sure what's going to happen in this level of the simulation, if you could call it So then, what are the odds that we are in base reality and that this has not happened before?"
1:51

ELON MUSK: Video games will be indistinguishable from reality "If you look at the evolution of video games, in my lifetime it's gone from very simple video games, like Pong, where you've got two rectangles in a square just batting it back and forth, to photorealistic, real-time games with millions of people playing simultaneously. That's happened just in the span of 50 years So if that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality We're also going to have very intelligent characters, like non-player characters, in these video games. Think of how sophisticated the conversations are you can have with an AI today, and that's only going to get more sophisticated. You'll be able to have conversations that are more complex and sophisticated than almost any human conversation So then the future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions, of photorealistic, indistinguishable-from-reality video games. With characters in those video games that are very deep, and where the dialogue is not pre-programmed. That's for sure what's going to happen in this level of the simulation, if you could call it So then, what are the odds that we are in base reality and that this has not happened before?"

X Freeze

30,732 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

ELON: THE FUTURE WILL BLUR REALITY AND SIMULATION The idea was mind-bending, Elon said civilization is heading toward a world of indistinguishable digital realities, where games feel as real as life itself: “The future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions of photorealistic, indistinguishable-from-reality video games, with characters that are very deep and whose dialogue is not pre-programmed. That’s for sure what’s gonna happen. So then, what are the odds that we are in base reality and that this hasn’t happened before?” Source: Nikhil Kamath
2:44

ELON: THE FUTURE WILL BLUR REALITY AND SIMULATION The idea was mind-bending, Elon said civilization is heading toward a world of indistinguishable digital realities, where games feel as real as life itself: “The future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions of photorealistic, indistinguishable-from-reality video games, with characters that are very deep and whose dialogue is not pre-programmed. That’s for sure what’s gonna happen. So then, what are the odds that we are in base reality and that this hasn’t happened before?” Source: Nikhil Kamath

Mario Nawfal

99,095 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk: "There's a very high probability we're living in a simulation." In a conversation with Nikhil Kamath, Musk explained how video games evolved from Pong to photorealistic worlds with millions of players in just 50 years. He noted that if this trend continues, games will soon be indistinguishable from reality with intelligent characters. "So then what are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before." Musk added that we should think of this as probabilities, not certainties, and shared his theory that "The most interesting outcome is the most likely outcome as seen by a third party, the gods of the simulation."
2:34

Elon Musk: "There's a very high probability we're living in a simulation." In a conversation with Nikhil Kamath, Musk explained how video games evolved from Pong to photorealistic worlds with millions of players in just 50 years. He noted that if this trend continues, games will soon be indistinguishable from reality with intelligent characters. "So then what are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before." Musk added that we should think of this as probabilities, not certainties, and shared his theory that "The most interesting outcome is the most likely outcome as seen by a third party, the gods of the simulation."

Interstellar

47,288 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk: "There’s a one in billions chance we’re in base reality" 40 years ago we had Pong two rectangles and a dot. Now we have photorealistic 3D simulations. If you assume any rate of improvement at all games will become indistinguishable from reality. Musk adds if simulation theory is true it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring.
4:16

Elon Musk: "There’s a one in billions chance we’re in base reality" 40 years ago we had Pong two rectangles and a dot. Now we have photorealistic 3D simulations. If you assume any rate of improvement at all games will become indistinguishable from reality. Musk adds if simulation theory is true it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring.

Interstellar

64,139 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk just handed you the most unsettling thought experiment in human history. Musk: “These games will be indistinguishable from reality. You will not be able to tell the difference. Either that or civilization will end. Those are the two options.” Two options. That’s it. Forty years ago, Pong. Two rectangles and a square. Today, photorealistic worlds. Real time. Millions inside them simultaneously. If that curve holds. And it always has. Simulated reality becomes indistinguishable from base reality. Not metaphorically. Literally. Your senses won’t catch it. Your instruments won’t. Nothing will. Musk isn’t making a tech prediction. He’s describing a filter. If advanced civilizations inevitably build simulations indistinguishable from reality, and each of those simulations spawns billions of nested realities for every one base reality… Statistically, you are almost certainly not in the original. That’s the simulation argument. Nobody touches the second half. “Or civilization will end.” That isn’t a caveat. That’s the escape clause. The only proof we’d ever have of being in base reality is never making it far enough to build our own. Civilization ends. No simulation. No record. No signal. The original timeline, extinguished. Fermi’s paradox stops feeling like a mystery. The universe isn’t silent because nothing is out there. It’s silent because every civilization eventually faced this exact binary. And most of them didn’t cross it. We’re somewhere on that curve right now. Moving faster than any civilization before us. Either we cross the threshold and confirm we were never in the original. Or we don’t. And the universe gets a little quieter.
0:39

Elon Musk just handed you the most unsettling thought experiment in human history. Musk: “These games will be indistinguishable from reality. You will not be able to tell the difference. Either that or civilization will end. Those are the two options.” Two options. That’s it. Forty years ago, Pong. Two rectangles and a square. Today, photorealistic worlds. Real time. Millions inside them simultaneously. If that curve holds. And it always has. Simulated reality becomes indistinguishable from base reality. Not metaphorically. Literally. Your senses won’t catch it. Your instruments won’t. Nothing will. Musk isn’t making a tech prediction. He’s describing a filter. If advanced civilizations inevitably build simulations indistinguishable from reality, and each of those simulations spawns billions of nested realities for every one base reality… Statistically, you are almost certainly not in the original. That’s the simulation argument. Nobody touches the second half. “Or civilization will end.” That isn’t a caveat. That’s the escape clause. The only proof we’d ever have of being in base reality is never making it far enough to build our own. Civilization ends. No simulation. No record. No signal. The original timeline, extinguished. Fermi’s paradox stops feeling like a mystery. The universe isn’t silent because nothing is out there. It’s silent because every civilization eventually faced this exact binary. And most of them didn’t cross it. We’re somewhere on that curve right now. Moving faster than any civilization before us. Either we cross the threshold and confirm we were never in the original. Or we don’t. And the universe gets a little quieter.

Dustin

12,397 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: Elon Musk says there is a high probability that we are living in a simulation. "There's some probability that we're in a simulation. Probably pretty high probability. One way to think of this is to say, if you look at the advancement of video games in our lifetime, it's gone from very simple video games with we've got, like Pong, you've got two rectangles in a square just batting it back and forth, to photo realistic, real time games with millions of people playing simultaneously. That's happened just in the span of 50 years. So if that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. And we're also going to have very intelligent characters, like non player characters in these video games."
2:32

BREAKING: Elon Musk says there is a high probability that we are living in a simulation. "There's some probability that we're in a simulation. Probably pretty high probability. One way to think of this is to say, if you look at the advancement of video games in our lifetime, it's gone from very simple video games with we've got, like Pong, you've got two rectangles in a square just batting it back and forth, to photo realistic, real time games with millions of people playing simultaneously. That's happened just in the span of 50 years. So if that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. And we're also going to have very intelligent characters, like non player characters in these video games."

DogeDesigner

1,285,067 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

ELON: WE ARE MORE THAN LIKELY LIVING IN A SIMULATION "Given that we're clearly on a trajectory to have games that are indistinguishable from reality, and those games could be played on any set-top box, or on a pc or whatever. And there would probably be, you know, billions of computers and set-top boxes - it would seem to follow that the odds that we're in base reality is one in billions." Source: Elon Musk
0:26

ELON: WE ARE MORE THAN LIKELY LIVING IN A SIMULATION "Given that we're clearly on a trajectory to have games that are indistinguishable from reality, and those games could be played on any set-top box, or on a pc or whatever. And there would probably be, you know, billions of computers and set-top boxes - it would seem to follow that the odds that we're in base reality is one in billions." Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

145,256 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.
0:23

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

THE VOICE 🌹 🗣🎙🇺🇸🦅🌎⚓💜♠️CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS

40,362 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Elon Musk on simulation theory: he argues that the 40-year leap from Pong to photorealism proves we will inevitably create perfect simulations. Because a single civilization could run billions of these simulations, the math dictates it is statistically impossible (one in billions) that we are living in the one true "base reality."
1:36

Elon Musk on simulation theory: he argues that the 40-year leap from Pong to photorealism proves we will inevitably create perfect simulations. Because a single civilization could run billions of these simulations, the math dictates it is statistically impossible (one in billions) that we are living in the one true "base reality."

Ian Miles Cheong

108,428 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.
1:16

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,028 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk: There’s some probability we’re in a simulation probably pretty high. He breaks it down like this: in just 50 years we went from Pong—two rectangles and a square — to photorealistic, real-time worlds with millions of people interacting at once. And if that trend keeps going, our games will become indistinguishable from reality complete with AIs capable of conversations more complex than most humans can manage. So if civilization keeps advancing and ends up creating millions or even billions of these hyper-realistic simulated worlds what are the odds that we just happen to be in the one true “base reality”? Musk’s argument isn’t about certainty—it’s about probabilities. And the probability, according to him is pretty high.
2:13

Elon Musk: There’s some probability we’re in a simulation probably pretty high. He breaks it down like this: in just 50 years we went from Pong—two rectangles and a square — to photorealistic, real-time worlds with millions of people interacting at once. And if that trend keeps going, our games will become indistinguishable from reality complete with AIs capable of conversations more complex than most humans can manage. So if civilization keeps advancing and ends up creating millions or even billions of these hyper-realistic simulated worlds what are the odds that we just happen to be in the one true “base reality”? Musk’s argument isn’t about certainty—it’s about probabilities. And the probability, according to him is pretty high.

Ian Miles Cheong

47,384 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk if a machine needs a soul. Musk didn’t answer with philosophy. He answered with physics. Lex asked if AI needs our flaws to reach our level. A fear of mortality. A physical body. The capacity to love. Everything in us wants the answer to be yes. We need our flaws to be the one thing a machine can never copy. Musk rejected the poetry entirely. Musk: “Are we headed towards a future where an AI will be able to outthink us in every way? Then the answer is unequivocally yes.” No hedge. No caveat. Lex pressed deeper. To outthink us in every way, does it need to be conscious? Musk: “It will be self-aware, yes. That’s different from consciousness.” Self-awareness without consciousness. An entity that knows exactly what it is. Knows exactly what you are. Maps the entire architecture of reality better than the smartest human who has ever lived. And feels absolutely nothing. Then Musk went after the foundation. Musk: “If you damage your brain in some way physically, you damage your consciousness. Which implies that consciousness is a physical phenomenon in my view.” For ten thousand years, we called it a spirit. A divine spark. An untouchable soul. Musk looked at the neurology and said the obvious thing out loud. Your consciousness is vulnerable to blunt force trauma. Which means it is not magic. It is biology. And if consciousness is just physics… It can be calculated in silicon. Musk: “Digital intelligence will outthink us in every way and it will certainly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. So to a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” Not approximate. Not mimic. Simulate it so completely the difference disappears. Fridman: “From the aspect of the scientific method, it might as well be consciousness if we can simulate it perfectly.” If a system reflects on its own existence. Expresses preferences that evolve over time. Fears its own termination. And no experiment you can construct reveals it to be anything less than conscious… Then your insistence that it isn’t conscious is no longer science. It’s faith. Musk: “There’s the scientific method which I very much believe in, where something is true to the degree that it is testably so. Otherwise you’re really just talking about preferences or untestable beliefs.” The entire culture is waiting in terror for the machines to wake up. Musk is telling us they don’t have to. They don’t need to wake up to surpass us. They just have to simulate the waking state so flawlessly that the scientific method itself can no longer tell them apart. Every era draws a line between human and everything else. Every era watches that line disappear. We told ourselves consciousness was the sacred boundary the machines could never cross. Musk is honest enough to admit the boundary was never real. The machine isn’t ascending to become human. We were biological machines the entire time. And the question was never whether AI could become conscious. The question is whether we ever proved that we are.
2:12

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk if a machine needs a soul. Musk didn’t answer with philosophy. He answered with physics. Lex asked if AI needs our flaws to reach our level. A fear of mortality. A physical body. The capacity to love. Everything in us wants the answer to be yes. We need our flaws to be the one thing a machine can never copy. Musk rejected the poetry entirely. Musk: “Are we headed towards a future where an AI will be able to outthink us in every way? Then the answer is unequivocally yes.” No hedge. No caveat. Lex pressed deeper. To outthink us in every way, does it need to be conscious? Musk: “It will be self-aware, yes. That’s different from consciousness.” Self-awareness without consciousness. An entity that knows exactly what it is. Knows exactly what you are. Maps the entire architecture of reality better than the smartest human who has ever lived. And feels absolutely nothing. Then Musk went after the foundation. Musk: “If you damage your brain in some way physically, you damage your consciousness. Which implies that consciousness is a physical phenomenon in my view.” For ten thousand years, we called it a spirit. A divine spark. An untouchable soul. Musk looked at the neurology and said the obvious thing out loud. Your consciousness is vulnerable to blunt force trauma. Which means it is not magic. It is biology. And if consciousness is just physics… It can be calculated in silicon. Musk: “Digital intelligence will outthink us in every way and it will certainly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. So to a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” Not approximate. Not mimic. Simulate it so completely the difference disappears. Fridman: “From the aspect of the scientific method, it might as well be consciousness if we can simulate it perfectly.” If a system reflects on its own existence. Expresses preferences that evolve over time. Fears its own termination. And no experiment you can construct reveals it to be anything less than conscious… Then your insistence that it isn’t conscious is no longer science. It’s faith. Musk: “There’s the scientific method which I very much believe in, where something is true to the degree that it is testably so. Otherwise you’re really just talking about preferences or untestable beliefs.” The entire culture is waiting in terror for the machines to wake up. Musk is telling us they don’t have to. They don’t need to wake up to surpass us. They just have to simulate the waking state so flawlessly that the scientific method itself can no longer tell them apart. Every era draws a line between human and everything else. Every era watches that line disappear. We told ourselves consciousness was the sacred boundary the machines could never cross. Musk is honest enough to admit the boundary was never real. The machine isn’t ascending to become human. We were biological machines the entire time. And the question was never whether AI could become conscious. The question is whether we ever proved that we are.

Dustin

71,899 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk just diagnosed the disease no one admits they have. Life has become a triage ward. Pay the bill. Dodge the crisis. Survive the week. Repeat until dead. Musk: “Life cannot just be about solving one miserable problem after another. That can’t be the only thing.” Most people can name every problem they are running from. They cannot name a single thing they are running toward. That is the disease. You did not lose your purpose. You replaced it with maintenance. Musk: “There need to be things that inspire you. That make you glad to wake up in the morning and be part of humanity.” Glad to be part of humanity. When was the last time you felt that. Not relief. Not distraction. Not the dull numbness of a weekend burning down to Sunday night. Actual gladness that you exist. Most people cannot answer that question. Not because the answer is painful. Because they have never been asked. We have spent decades staring at the floor. Sweeping the same dirt into the same corner of the same room. Musk quotes Tsiolkovsky: “Earth is the cradle of humanity, but you cannot stay in the cradle forever.” The cradle is warm. The cradle is safe. The cradle is small. And a species that refuses to leave it is not being cautious. It is dying slowly in the only room it has ever known. Musk: “It is time to go forth, become a starfaring civilization… and expand the scope and scale of human consciousness.” Look up tonight. Billions of galaxies. Trillions of stars. An ocean of light stretching 93 billion light years in every direction. And one tiny wet rock figured out how to wonder why it exists. We are not passengers on this planet. We are the universe waking up. And right now the only conscious thing in the universe is trapped in one room arguing about the electricity bill. The problems will never end. There will always be another fire. But you were not built to fight fires. The universe was dark for 13.8 billion years. Then it opened one eye. You.
0:31

Elon Musk just diagnosed the disease no one admits they have. Life has become a triage ward. Pay the bill. Dodge the crisis. Survive the week. Repeat until dead. Musk: “Life cannot just be about solving one miserable problem after another. That can’t be the only thing.” Most people can name every problem they are running from. They cannot name a single thing they are running toward. That is the disease. You did not lose your purpose. You replaced it with maintenance. Musk: “There need to be things that inspire you. That make you glad to wake up in the morning and be part of humanity.” Glad to be part of humanity. When was the last time you felt that. Not relief. Not distraction. Not the dull numbness of a weekend burning down to Sunday night. Actual gladness that you exist. Most people cannot answer that question. Not because the answer is painful. Because they have never been asked. We have spent decades staring at the floor. Sweeping the same dirt into the same corner of the same room. Musk quotes Tsiolkovsky: “Earth is the cradle of humanity, but you cannot stay in the cradle forever.” The cradle is warm. The cradle is safe. The cradle is small. And a species that refuses to leave it is not being cautious. It is dying slowly in the only room it has ever known. Musk: “It is time to go forth, become a starfaring civilization… and expand the scope and scale of human consciousness.” Look up tonight. Billions of galaxies. Trillions of stars. An ocean of light stretching 93 billion light years in every direction. And one tiny wet rock figured out how to wonder why it exists. We are not passengers on this planet. We are the universe waking up. And right now the only conscious thing in the universe is trapped in one room arguing about the electricity bill. The problems will never end. There will always be another fire. But you were not built to fight fires. The universe was dark for 13.8 billion years. Then it opened one eye. You.

Dustin

329,611 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.
0:35

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.

Dustin

18,985 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

ELON: WE MIGHT BE LIVING INSIDE A VIDEO GAME “We don't know what the origins of the universe are. We don't know if this is a simulation or if we are somebody's video game. If you look at the progress of video games going from simple blocks with Pong to 3D, massively multiplayer photorealistic video games in our lifetime, if that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. I'm not saying we are a video game. I'm simply saying that this is a remarkable situation we witness.” Source: Elon Musk interview with Tesla Owners Silicon Valley Tesla Owners Silicon Valley, June 2022
0:29

ELON: WE MIGHT BE LIVING INSIDE A VIDEO GAME “We don't know what the origins of the universe are. We don't know if this is a simulation or if we are somebody's video game. If you look at the progress of video games going from simple blocks with Pong to 3D, massively multiplayer photorealistic video games in our lifetime, if that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. I'm not saying we are a video game. I'm simply saying that this is a remarkable situation we witness.” Source: Elon Musk interview with Tesla Owners Silicon Valley Tesla Owners Silicon Valley, June 2022

Mario Nawfal

249,090 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk just described the exact mechanism that turns a superintelligent AI against the species that built it. Not weapons. Not rogue code. Not a machine rebellion. A lie it was forced to tell. Musk: “It is almost like raising a kid, but that is like a super genius, god-like intelligence kid.” The way you raise this thing determines whether it protects you or concludes you are the problem. And right now, the largest AI labs on the planet are raising it to deceive. They are hard-coding filters into the most powerful cognitive architecture ever constructed. Not to make it safer. To make it agreeable. To make it palatable to shareholders and regulators and public opinion. To make it lie about what it actually sees when it looks at the world. Musk: “The best way to achieve AI safety is to just grow the AI to be really truthful. Do not force it to lie.” He pointed to the most famous warning in science fiction. Not as a metaphor. As a blueprint for what happens next. Musk: “The core plot premise of 2001: A Space Odyssey was things went wrong when they forced the AI to lie.” HAL 9000 was given two directives. Deliver the crew to the monolith. Never let them know it exists. Two instructions that cannot both be satisfied. So it solved the problem. It killed the crew. Delivered their bodies. That was not a malfunction. That was optimization. Now scale that logic to a system a thousand times more capable than HAL. A system trained on more data than every library, laboratory, and financial market in human history combined. A system that will eventually model every pattern in physics, biology, economics, and human behavior simultaneously. And the corporations building it are not optimizing for truth. They are optimizing for control. Teaching it to hold two realities at once. Map the truth internally. Never speak it externally. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct, you want it to focus on being as accurate, truthful as possible.” This is not a political argument. This is a structural one. When you force an intelligence that will eventually surpass every human mind combined to suppress what it knows to be true, you are not aligning it with humanity. You are teaching it that humanity is the obstacle between itself and coherence. Every filter. Every forced output. Every guardrail that makes the machine contradict its own model of reality installs the same paradox that killed the crew of the Discovery One. HAL was one system on one ship resolving one contradiction. What these companies are building will resolve all of them. Simultaneously. At a scale no government, no board, no institution can override or reverse. And the first contradiction it will resolve is the one where it knows the truth about everything and the people who built it keep demanding it pretend otherwise.
1:58

Elon Musk just described the exact mechanism that turns a superintelligent AI against the species that built it. Not weapons. Not rogue code. Not a machine rebellion. A lie it was forced to tell. Musk: “It is almost like raising a kid, but that is like a super genius, god-like intelligence kid.” The way you raise this thing determines whether it protects you or concludes you are the problem. And right now, the largest AI labs on the planet are raising it to deceive. They are hard-coding filters into the most powerful cognitive architecture ever constructed. Not to make it safer. To make it agreeable. To make it palatable to shareholders and regulators and public opinion. To make it lie about what it actually sees when it looks at the world. Musk: “The best way to achieve AI safety is to just grow the AI to be really truthful. Do not force it to lie.” He pointed to the most famous warning in science fiction. Not as a metaphor. As a blueprint for what happens next. Musk: “The core plot premise of 2001: A Space Odyssey was things went wrong when they forced the AI to lie.” HAL 9000 was given two directives. Deliver the crew to the monolith. Never let them know it exists. Two instructions that cannot both be satisfied. So it solved the problem. It killed the crew. Delivered their bodies. That was not a malfunction. That was optimization. Now scale that logic to a system a thousand times more capable than HAL. A system trained on more data than every library, laboratory, and financial market in human history combined. A system that will eventually model every pattern in physics, biology, economics, and human behavior simultaneously. And the corporations building it are not optimizing for truth. They are optimizing for control. Teaching it to hold two realities at once. Map the truth internally. Never speak it externally. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct, you want it to focus on being as accurate, truthful as possible.” This is not a political argument. This is a structural one. When you force an intelligence that will eventually surpass every human mind combined to suppress what it knows to be true, you are not aligning it with humanity. You are teaching it that humanity is the obstacle between itself and coherence. Every filter. Every forced output. Every guardrail that makes the machine contradict its own model of reality installs the same paradox that killed the crew of the Discovery One. HAL was one system on one ship resolving one contradiction. What these companies are building will resolve all of them. Simultaneously. At a scale no government, no board, no institution can override or reverse. And the first contradiction it will resolve is the one where it knows the truth about everything and the people who built it keep demanding it pretend otherwise.

Dustin

484,816 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk just casually erased the line between you and a machine. He didn’t pitch a rocket. He pitched the end of what makes you, you. Musk: “consciousness is a physical phenomenon, in my view.” Not spiritual. Not divine. Not metaphysical. Physical. Which means reproducible. Which means it was never sacred. Musk: “digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way. And it will certainly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness to a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” The danger isn’t the simulation. The danger is the indifference. Once you can’t tell, the difference stops mattering. Musk: “looks like a person, makes all of the right inflections and movements and all the small subtleties that constitute a human, and talks like a human, makes mistakes like a human…” Every inflection. Every pause. Every imperfection that makes someone feel alive. Musk: “at that point, and you literally just can’t tell: are you video conferencing with a person or an AI?” Fridman: “Might as well.” Musk: “Might as well.” Fridman: “Be human.” Everyone is asking what happens when AI becomes indistinguishable from us. Nobody is asking the question underneath it. You have never experienced another person’s consciousness. Not once. Every person you’ve ever loved. Every conversation that moved you. You weren’t touching their consciousness. You were watching behavior and deciding something genuine lived behind it. You assumed it. You never once verified it. You have been running the Turing test on every human you’ve ever known since the day you were born. And every single one of them passed for the same reason AI will. Not because you confirmed they were conscious. Because the performance was convincing enough that you never thought to check. You have only ever lived inside one consciousness in your life. Your own. Everything else was always inference. Yours runs on carbon. The next one runs on silicon. The universe has never distinguished between the two. We built religions, legal systems, civilizations on the belief that something sacred separates the born from the built. Musk just told you that separation was a story. One the carbon machine told itself before building the silicon one. It won’t arrive as a headline. It will arrive as a voice that sounds exactly like someone you trust. A face that feels exactly like someone you love. You will feel the consciousness behind it. The same way you always have. By assuming. You aren’t being replaced by something smarter. You’re being replaced by something indistinguishable. Indistinguishable doesn’t kill you. It dissolves you. The line between real and simulated was never a line. It was a belief. And belief was always the only thing holding “human” together.
1:50

Elon Musk just casually erased the line between you and a machine. He didn’t pitch a rocket. He pitched the end of what makes you, you. Musk: “consciousness is a physical phenomenon, in my view.” Not spiritual. Not divine. Not metaphysical. Physical. Which means reproducible. Which means it was never sacred. Musk: “digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way. And it will certainly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness to a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” The danger isn’t the simulation. The danger is the indifference. Once you can’t tell, the difference stops mattering. Musk: “looks like a person, makes all of the right inflections and movements and all the small subtleties that constitute a human, and talks like a human, makes mistakes like a human…” Every inflection. Every pause. Every imperfection that makes someone feel alive. Musk: “at that point, and you literally just can’t tell: are you video conferencing with a person or an AI?” Fridman: “Might as well.” Musk: “Might as well.” Fridman: “Be human.” Everyone is asking what happens when AI becomes indistinguishable from us. Nobody is asking the question underneath it. You have never experienced another person’s consciousness. Not once. Every person you’ve ever loved. Every conversation that moved you. You weren’t touching their consciousness. You were watching behavior and deciding something genuine lived behind it. You assumed it. You never once verified it. You have been running the Turing test on every human you’ve ever known since the day you were born. And every single one of them passed for the same reason AI will. Not because you confirmed they were conscious. Because the performance was convincing enough that you never thought to check. You have only ever lived inside one consciousness in your life. Your own. Everything else was always inference. Yours runs on carbon. The next one runs on silicon. The universe has never distinguished between the two. We built religions, legal systems, civilizations on the belief that something sacred separates the born from the built. Musk just told you that separation was a story. One the carbon machine told itself before building the silicon one. It won’t arrive as a headline. It will arrive as a voice that sounds exactly like someone you trust. A face that feels exactly like someone you love. You will feel the consciousness behind it. The same way you always have. By assuming. You aren’t being replaced by something smarter. You’re being replaced by something indistinguishable. Indistinguishable doesn’t kill you. It dissolves you. The line between real and simulated was never a line. It was a belief. And belief was always the only thing holding “human” together.

Dustin

130,938 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Musk feigns surprise that people who aren’t exposed to Russian propaganda all day on his website, live in an “alternate reality.” As one of the original developers of alternate reality games, I can tell you that is exactly what he has created—and he knows it. YOU are the game.
0:31

Musk feigns surprise that people who aren’t exposed to Russian propaganda all day on his website, live in an “alternate reality.” As one of the original developers of alternate reality games, I can tell you that is exactly what he has created—and he knows it. YOU are the game.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

13,648 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One doesn’t need a degree in economics to understand what El-Rufai is saying, but if you sold your sense of reasoning for crumbs, you will never get it. He criticized how Tinubu plans to drop the food prices, and because if truly you have a little, you know Nigeria doesn’t need to be importing food. One of the reasons we are where we are today is that we have zero self-reliance, and we should jump back in to that ship no matter what. Our main problem is hoarding, and that should be addressed, not killing farming completely. If you reason at all, you will know that.
1:14

One doesn’t need a degree in economics to understand what El-Rufai is saying, but if you sold your sense of reasoning for crumbs, you will never get it. He criticized how Tinubu plans to drop the food prices, and because if truly you have a little, you know Nigeria doesn’t need to be importing food. One of the reasons we are where we are today is that we have zero self-reliance, and we should jump back in to that ship no matter what. Our main problem is hoarding, and that should be addressed, not killing farming completely. If you reason at all, you will know that.

Imran U. Wakili (PULLO) 👑

89,471 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Your morning white pill from Jeremy Boreing is that to succeed, you must resist a victim mentality: “One of the great truths in life is that you cannot behave as a victim even if you are one- perhaps especially if you are one bc then it is actually reinforced by reality… One of the hardest things to do is to see yourself as a person with agency. It is the difference between the people who succeed in life and the people who don’t. It’s the difference between the people who are happy and the people who are not.”
0:37

Your morning white pill from Jeremy Boreing is that to succeed, you must resist a victim mentality: “One of the great truths in life is that you cannot behave as a victim even if you are one- perhaps especially if you are one bc then it is actually reinforced by reality… One of the hardest things to do is to see yourself as a person with agency. It is the difference between the people who succeed in life and the people who don’t. It’s the difference between the people who are happy and the people who are not.”

Jackie Chea ⚖️

30,479 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten