正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Elon Musk says working will be "optional" soon. Robots and AI will eliminate non-physical jobs, creating a "Universal High-Income" where everyone gets what they want. But a Yale paper shows the economics behind his prediction are far more brutal than he suggests. I'm talking about the paper titled "We... Won't Be Missed." It concludes: "Half the workforce could stop working tomorrow and GDP wouldn't budge." i.e. humans become economically meaningless. The paper splits all work into two categories: 1) Bottleneck work This work is essential for growth. Energy production, logistics, scientific discovery, and infrastructure. The economy cannot grow unless this work scales. 2) Accessory work It's non-essential. Arts, hospitality, therapy, and fine dining. It's nice to have, but not required for growth. AGI systematically takes over everything that's mission-critical. Some accessory work stays human, not because AGI can't do it, but because we have surplus workers and it's not worth the compute. In other words, your future salary will be based on the computational cost of replicating your work. As compute gets exponentially cheaper, your wage ceiling plummets. The economy grows, productivity increases, but your value is tied to declining tech costs. Yale's paper concluded: Labor's share of GDP converges to zero. All income flows to owners of computational resources. The transition speed determines how painful this gets. If technology develops faster than computing scales, we get jagged disruption, with some workers receiving huge premiums before crashing. If compute scales faster, we get gradual, predictable decline in wages. In my opinion, there is a paradox that Musk missed here. Work being "optional" is an illusion. Humans need work, maybe not for survival, but for purpose. The existential question is: Would people still choose to work when it's economically meaningless... and when your contribution doesn't matter for progress or prosperity?show more

Ruben Hassid

38,470 subscribers

44,173 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Elon Musk: In less than 10 years, work won’t be something you have to do… it’ll be something you choose to do. He says the future of AI and robotics is heading toward a world where working becomes optional — just like growing your own vegetables. You can do it, but you don’t have to. Some people will still work because they enjoy it, not because they need to survive. That flips everything we know about jobs, money, and purpose. Imagine waking up and deciding to work purely because you want to, not because you’re forced to. That’s the kind of shift he’s talking about. And it doesn’t stop there — Musk believes Tesla’s Optimus robots could eventually perform highly skilled tasks like surgery, delivering medical care that’s better than what the best humans can provide today. A future where everyone, anywhere in the world, gets access to elite-level healthcare. Optional work. Superhuman doctors. AI running the backbone of society.

Elon Musk: In less than 10 years, work won’t be something you have to do… it’ll be something you choose to do. He says the future of AI and robotics is heading toward a world where working becomes optional — just like growing your own vegetables. You can do it, but you don’t have to. Some people will still work because they enjoy it, not because they need to survive. That flips everything we know about jobs, money, and purpose. Imagine waking up and deciding to work purely because you want to, not because you’re forced to. That’s the kind of shift he’s talking about. And it doesn’t stop there — Musk believes Tesla’s Optimus robots could eventually perform highly skilled tasks like surgery, delivering medical care that’s better than what the best humans can provide today. A future where everyone, anywhere in the world, gets access to elite-level healthcare. Optional work. Superhuman doctors. AI running the backbone of society.

Ian Miles Cheong

23,981 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon just told Zerodha founder Nikhil Kamath something insane about the future of work. And if he's right, everything we think about careers is about to collapse. In less than 20 years, Elon predicts working will be completely optional. Not shorter workweeks. Not four-day weeks... ZERO work required to survive. "My prediction is working will be optional, working at all will be optional. Like a hobby pretty much." He's saying AI and robotics will hit productivity levels so high that humans won't need jobs. Universal High Income replaces Universal Basic Income. Everyone gets what they need without working. And Elon says it could happen in as little as 10-15 years. Not some distant sci-fi future. Your kids graduating college right now might enter a world where their degree is instantly obsolete. Not because they chose the wrong major. Because the CONCEPT of work-for-survival disappears. "If you can think of it, you can have it." AI produces everything. Robots manufacture everything. Humans? Optional in the production chain. When Nikhil asked about shorter workweeks, Elon shut it down: That's not the future. The future is NO workweeks. The Indian context makes this wild: India just hit below replacement fertility rate (under 2.1). Population declining for the first time. Everyone's panicking about "demographic dividend" disappearing. But Elon's saying: WHO CARES? One AI + robot can do the work of 1,000 humans. You don't need population growth when you have exponential productivity growth. The problem isn't "not enough workers." The problem is we're still thinking about economics like it's 1950. Here's what Elon told Indian entrepreneurs specifically: "Make more than you take. Be a net contributor to society." But if AI makes more than anyone can take... What does "contributor" even mean? The framework collapses. Elon also warned: when AI saturates all human needs, it starts doing things for ITSELF. Not for humans. AI and robotics producing for AI and robotics. We become the side quest. And nobody knows what happens in that world. Elon calls it the "singularity" - the point where you can't predict what's next. Like a black hole. You don't know what's past the event horizon. He's confident it's coming. Just not confident about what it looks like. And the crazy thing is, Elon's the only person with the track record to actually KNOW. He's building: - Tesla (real-world AI, FSD, Optimus robots) - SpaceX (the physical infrastructure) - xAI (the intelligence layer) He's not speculating from the sidelines. He's literally BUILDING the world he's describing. When someone like that says "work becomes optional in 15 years"... You don't laugh it off. You prepare for it. What does that preparation look like? Elon says: pursue truth, beauty, curiosity. Not money. Not status. Not promotions. Because those currencies lose meaning when goods and services are infinite. Your competitive advantage becomes: what can you think that AI can't? Not what you can DO. What you can THINK. And even that... might have a shelf life. This is either the biggest opportunity or the biggest threat humanity has ever faced. Elon's betting opportunity. But he admits that there's a chance this goes wrong. Very wrong. He references Star Trek vs. James Cameron movies. One's utopia. One's apocalypse. "Let's try for the Star Trek outcome." If Elon's right, we have 10-20 years before everything changes. That's one generation. Your kids won't work. Your grandkids won't even understand what "a job" meant. And the transition will be brutal. Elon admits: "severe social pain and structural chaos." Because we're not just changing jobs... We're changing what it MEANS to be human.

Elon just told Zerodha founder Nikhil Kamath something insane about the future of work. And if he's right, everything we think about careers is about to collapse. In less than 20 years, Elon predicts working will be completely optional. Not shorter workweeks. Not four-day weeks... ZERO work required to survive. "My prediction is working will be optional, working at all will be optional. Like a hobby pretty much." He's saying AI and robotics will hit productivity levels so high that humans won't need jobs. Universal High Income replaces Universal Basic Income. Everyone gets what they need without working. And Elon says it could happen in as little as 10-15 years. Not some distant sci-fi future. Your kids graduating college right now might enter a world where their degree is instantly obsolete. Not because they chose the wrong major. Because the CONCEPT of work-for-survival disappears. "If you can think of it, you can have it." AI produces everything. Robots manufacture everything. Humans? Optional in the production chain. When Nikhil asked about shorter workweeks, Elon shut it down: That's not the future. The future is NO workweeks. The Indian context makes this wild: India just hit below replacement fertility rate (under 2.1). Population declining for the first time. Everyone's panicking about "demographic dividend" disappearing. But Elon's saying: WHO CARES? One AI + robot can do the work of 1,000 humans. You don't need population growth when you have exponential productivity growth. The problem isn't "not enough workers." The problem is we're still thinking about economics like it's 1950. Here's what Elon told Indian entrepreneurs specifically: "Make more than you take. Be a net contributor to society." But if AI makes more than anyone can take... What does "contributor" even mean? The framework collapses. Elon also warned: when AI saturates all human needs, it starts doing things for ITSELF. Not for humans. AI and robotics producing for AI and robotics. We become the side quest. And nobody knows what happens in that world. Elon calls it the "singularity" - the point where you can't predict what's next. Like a black hole. You don't know what's past the event horizon. He's confident it's coming. Just not confident about what it looks like. And the crazy thing is, Elon's the only person with the track record to actually KNOW. He's building: - Tesla (real-world AI, FSD, Optimus robots) - SpaceX (the physical infrastructure) - xAI (the intelligence layer) He's not speculating from the sidelines. He's literally BUILDING the world he's describing. When someone like that says "work becomes optional in 15 years"... You don't laugh it off. You prepare for it. What does that preparation look like? Elon says: pursue truth, beauty, curiosity. Not money. Not status. Not promotions. Because those currencies lose meaning when goods and services are infinite. Your competitive advantage becomes: what can you think that AI can't? Not what you can DO. What you can THINK. And even that... might have a shelf life. This is either the biggest opportunity or the biggest threat humanity has ever faced. Elon's betting opportunity. But he admits that there's a chance this goes wrong. Very wrong. He references Star Trek vs. James Cameron movies. One's utopia. One's apocalypse. "Let's try for the Star Trek outcome." If Elon's right, we have 10-20 years before everything changes. That's one generation. Your kids won't work. Your grandkids won't even understand what "a job" meant. And the transition will be brutal. Elon admits: "severe social pain and structural chaos." Because we're not just changing jobs... We're changing what it MEANS to be human.

Ricardo

44,140 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: In the future, working be like playing sports or a video game. “My prediction is that work will be optional. It’ll be like playing sports or a video game or something like that. If you want to work you can, in the same way that you can go to the store and just buy some vegetables, or you could grow vegetables in your backyard. It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, but some people still do it because they like growing vegetables. That will be what work is like: optional. Now, between now and then, there’s actually a lot of work to get to that point.” From: U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum November 19, 2025

Elon Musk: In the future, working be like playing sports or a video game. “My prediction is that work will be optional. It’ll be like playing sports or a video game or something like that. If you want to work you can, in the same way that you can go to the store and just buy some vegetables, or you could grow vegetables in your backyard. It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, but some people still do it because they like growing vegetables. That will be what work is like: optional. Now, between now and then, there’s actually a lot of work to get to that point.” From: U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum November 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

11,855 次观看 • 4 个月前

To be a successful founder, you have to believe that what you're working on is going to work — despite knowing it probably won't! That sounds like an oxymoron, but it's really not. Believing that what you're building is going to work is an essential component of coming to work with the energy, fortitude, and determination it's going to require to even have a shot. Knowing it probably won't is accepting the odds of that shot. It's simply the reality that most things in business don't work out. At least not in the long run. Most businesses fail. If not right away, then eventually. Yet the world economy is full of entrepreneurs who try anyway. Not because they don't know the odds, but because they've chosen to believe they're special. The best way to balance these opposing points — the conviction that you'll make it work, the knowledge that it probably won't — is to do all your work in a manner that'll make you proud either way. If it doesn't work, you still made something you wouldn't be ashamed to put your name on. And if it does work, you'll beam with pride from making it on the basis of something solid. The deep regret from trying and failing only truly hits when you look in the mirror and see Dostoevsky staring back at you with this punch to the gut: "Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing." Oof. Believe it's going to work. Build it in a way that makes you proud to sign it. Base your worth on a human on something greater than a business outcome.

To be a successful founder, you have to believe that what you're working on is going to work — despite knowing it probably won't! That sounds like an oxymoron, but it's really not. Believing that what you're building is going to work is an essential component of coming to work with the energy, fortitude, and determination it's going to require to even have a shot. Knowing it probably won't is accepting the odds of that shot. It's simply the reality that most things in business don't work out. At least not in the long run. Most businesses fail. If not right away, then eventually. Yet the world economy is full of entrepreneurs who try anyway. Not because they don't know the odds, but because they've chosen to believe they're special. The best way to balance these opposing points — the conviction that you'll make it work, the knowledge that it probably won't — is to do all your work in a manner that'll make you proud either way. If it doesn't work, you still made something you wouldn't be ashamed to put your name on. And if it does work, you'll beam with pride from making it on the basis of something solid. The deep regret from trying and failing only truly hits when you look in the mirror and see Dostoevsky staring back at you with this punch to the gut: "Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing." Oof. Believe it's going to work. Build it in a way that makes you proud to sign it. Base your worth on a human on something greater than a business outcome.

DHH

96,526 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk predicts working will be optional in less than 20 years. “My prediction is: in less than 20 years, working will be optional, like a hobby, pretty much. And that would be because of increased productivity, meaning people do not have to work; they don’t have to. Look, obviously people can play this back in 20 years and say, “Look, Elon made this ridiculous prediction and it’s not true,” but I think it will turn out to be true—that in less than 20 years, and maybe even as little as, I don’t know, 10 or 15 years, the advancements in AI and robotics will bring us to the point where working is optional. In the same way that, like, say, you can grow your own vegetables in your garden or you could go to the store and buy vegetables, you know. It’s much harder to grow your own vegetables, but you know, some people like to grow their vegetables, which is fine, you know. But it’ll be optional in that way, is my prediction.” — Via new Podcast with Nikhil Kamath

Elon Musk predicts working will be optional in less than 20 years. “My prediction is: in less than 20 years, working will be optional, like a hobby, pretty much. And that would be because of increased productivity, meaning people do not have to work; they don’t have to. Look, obviously people can play this back in 20 years and say, “Look, Elon made this ridiculous prediction and it’s not true,” but I think it will turn out to be true—that in less than 20 years, and maybe even as little as, I don’t know, 10 or 15 years, the advancements in AI and robotics will bring us to the point where working is optional. In the same way that, like, say, you can grow your own vegetables in your garden or you could go to the store and buy vegetables, you know. It’s much harder to grow your own vegetables, but you know, some people like to grow their vegetables, which is fine, you know. But it’ll be optional in that way, is my prediction.” — Via new Podcast with Nikhil Kamath

Nic Cruz Patane

61,603 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about where AI actually ends up. Musk: “The honest answer for AI and robotics is long term working will be optional.” Long term meaning ten years from now or less. For centuries, human survival has required human labor. That is the oldest equation in civilization. You work or you don’t eat. You work or you lose the shelter. You work or you fall behind everyone who does. Musk is describing the end of that equation entirely. Musk: “If you wanna work you can. Kind of like if you grow vegetables, you can grow vegetables in your garden or you can get them from the store.” The analogy is quieter than the claim deserves. Growing your own vegetables is something people do for joy. For ritual. For the satisfaction of making something with their hands. Not because they would starve otherwise. That is what work becomes. Musk: “It’s extra work to grow your own vegetables but people enjoy the process. That’s gonna be how work is in the future.” When AI and robotics scale to their limit, the cost of physical goods and services collapses toward zero. Labor stops being the mechanism that separates people who survive from people who don’t. What happens to human motivation when survival is no longer the reason to get up? That is the question nobody building this technology has answered. The abundance is coming. The crisis of meaning is coming with it. Musk is describing the greatest liberation in human history. He is also describing the greatest identity crisis our species has ever faced. Both arrive on the same timeline. Ten years or less.

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about where AI actually ends up. Musk: “The honest answer for AI and robotics is long term working will be optional.” Long term meaning ten years from now or less. For centuries, human survival has required human labor. That is the oldest equation in civilization. You work or you don’t eat. You work or you lose the shelter. You work or you fall behind everyone who does. Musk is describing the end of that equation entirely. Musk: “If you wanna work you can. Kind of like if you grow vegetables, you can grow vegetables in your garden or you can get them from the store.” The analogy is quieter than the claim deserves. Growing your own vegetables is something people do for joy. For ritual. For the satisfaction of making something with their hands. Not because they would starve otherwise. That is what work becomes. Musk: “It’s extra work to grow your own vegetables but people enjoy the process. That’s gonna be how work is in the future.” When AI and robotics scale to their limit, the cost of physical goods and services collapses toward zero. Labor stops being the mechanism that separates people who survive from people who don’t. What happens to human motivation when survival is no longer the reason to get up? That is the question nobody building this technology has answered. The abundance is coming. The crisis of meaning is coming with it. Musk is describing the greatest liberation in human history. He is also describing the greatest identity crisis our species has ever faced. Both arrive on the same timeline. Ten years or less.

Dustin

101,994 次观看 • 5 个月前

What do you do for a living today? AI and intelligent robots will increasingly take over many tasks from humans. And they will do it better, faster and cheaper. Yes, yours too. Many people will work much less or not at all in normal jobs. And earn less or even nothing. What will you live on then? And how will our companies survive when their customers don't have the money to buy their products and services? This is the key question for your financial future! We will take a look at three scenarios for the future of our life and the economy. If AI and robots work for us on a large scale, our future could be great. However, it could also turn out quite differently. We could also wake up in a horror scenario. Because we have a huge and catastrophic flaw in our economic system that could lead to disaster in a world of AI and robotics. Correcting this mistake is the biggest challenge. What the flaw is and how we can fix it, you'll learn in this video.

What do you do for a living today? AI and intelligent robots will increasingly take over many tasks from humans. And they will do it better, faster and cheaper. Yes, yours too. Many people will work much less or not at all in normal jobs. And earn less or even nothing. What will you live on then? And how will our companies survive when their customers don't have the money to buy their products and services? This is the key question for your financial future! We will take a look at three scenarios for the future of our life and the economy. If AI and robots work for us on a large scale, our future could be great. However, it could also turn out quite differently. We could also wake up in a horror scenario. Because we have a huge and catastrophic flaw in our economic system that could lead to disaster in a world of AI and robotics. Correcting this mistake is the biggest challenge. What the flaw is and how we can fix it, you'll learn in this video.

Dr Pero Micic

12,010,196 次观看 • 1 年前

Mary Barra, Chairman and CEO of General Motors, on the single most underrated trait that separates high performers from everyone else: It's not intelligence, experience, or even talent. She is direct about it: "In my experience, in school and career, at work and at play, there are lots of talented people out there. But talent alone isn't enough. You need something more." That "something more" is what most people overlook entirely. "One thing that distinguishes those who really make a difference in life, those who really contribute, is passion and hard work. Remember, hard work beats talent, if talent doesn't work hard." But Mary Barra takes it further than just working hard. Because working hard quietly, passively, and waiting for your turn doesn't move the needle either. Most people operate on the edges. They show up, do the work they're assigned, and wait to be noticed. Barra says that mindset is exactly what holds people back: "Don't be content to work around the edges of your profession. Don't wait to be invited to important meetings or asked to work on crucial assignments. Instead, do what it takes to ensure that you're in the middle of your business." The underrated trait is proactive hard work, not just hard work alone. "Speak up, volunteer, show your enthusiasm, knock on doors." And the compounding effect of that behaviour is significant at every level of an organisation: "As an employee, your enthusiasm will make your job more interesting and get you noticed. As a manager, your passion will inspire others to join your team and work as hard as you to accomplish great things." The people who consistently rise are the ones who stopped waiting for permission and started showing up like the work already mattered to them, because it always did.

Mary Barra, Chairman and CEO of General Motors, on the single most underrated trait that separates high performers from everyone else: It's not intelligence, experience, or even talent. She is direct about it: "In my experience, in school and career, at work and at play, there are lots of talented people out there. But talent alone isn't enough. You need something more." That "something more" is what most people overlook entirely. "One thing that distinguishes those who really make a difference in life, those who really contribute, is passion and hard work. Remember, hard work beats talent, if talent doesn't work hard." But Mary Barra takes it further than just working hard. Because working hard quietly, passively, and waiting for your turn doesn't move the needle either. Most people operate on the edges. They show up, do the work they're assigned, and wait to be noticed. Barra says that mindset is exactly what holds people back: "Don't be content to work around the edges of your profession. Don't wait to be invited to important meetings or asked to work on crucial assignments. Instead, do what it takes to ensure that you're in the middle of your business." The underrated trait is proactive hard work, not just hard work alone. "Speak up, volunteer, show your enthusiasm, knock on doors." And the compounding effect of that behaviour is significant at every level of an organisation: "As an employee, your enthusiasm will make your job more interesting and get you noticed. As a manager, your passion will inspire others to join your team and work as hard as you to accomplish great things." The people who consistently rise are the ones who stopped waiting for permission and started showing up like the work already mattered to them, because it always did.

Big Brain Business

391,186 次观看 • 4 个月前

Jensen Huang says the next internet is not for humans. It is for agents. "AI has become agentic, meaning that it can actually do work by itself." "One agent can communicate with another agent and say, 'I have some work to do. Let's team up together and let's do some work.'" "Inside our company... we have hundreds of thousands of agents probably running around right now that are doing work and they're talking to each other and they're solving problems." "All guardrailed, all sandboxed... but they're all working with each other." Then the part most people are not ready for: "The internet that we use today for a billion people will likely mostly be several billion, call it a hundred billion agents working around the clock." Companies talking to companies. Employee agents talking to employee agents. Self-driving cars, robots, manufacturing systems, buildings. "The world is going to be this layer of computing that's going to cocoon the earth, and it's going to be generating intelligence all the time."

Jensen Huang says the next internet is not for humans. It is for agents. "AI has become agentic, meaning that it can actually do work by itself." "One agent can communicate with another agent and say, 'I have some work to do. Let's team up together and let's do some work.'" "Inside our company... we have hundreds of thousands of agents probably running around right now that are doing work and they're talking to each other and they're solving problems." "All guardrailed, all sandboxed... but they're all working with each other." Then the part most people are not ready for: "The internet that we use today for a billion people will likely mostly be several billion, call it a hundred billion agents working around the clock." Companies talking to companies. Employee agents talking to employee agents. Self-driving cars, robots, manufacturing systems, buildings. "The world is going to be this layer of computing that's going to cocoon the earth, and it's going to be generating intelligence all the time."

Karl Mehta

17,931 次观看 • 1 个月前

“Working at SpaceX is like being dropped into a zone of shocking competence. Everybody is ultra competent and the reason everybody is ultra competent is because if they're not Elon Musk sniffs it out and fires them. Elon knows because he's talking to the people actually doing the work. At this point having done this for 25 years he can sniff this out really quickly. The best engineers in the world want to work for him because he's the one CEO who’s able to work with them as a peer on whatever the technology is. What would be better as an engineer than being able to design a rocket engine with Elon Musk as your engineering partner?”

“Working at SpaceX is like being dropped into a zone of shocking competence. Everybody is ultra competent and the reason everybody is ultra competent is because if they're not Elon Musk sniffs it out and fires them. Elon knows because he's talking to the people actually doing the work. At this point having done this for 25 years he can sniff this out really quickly. The best engineers in the world want to work for him because he's the one CEO who’s able to work with them as a peer on whatever the technology is. What would be better as an engineer than being able to design a rocket engine with Elon Musk as your engineering partner?”

David Senra

62,388 次观看 • 5 个月前

Everything in the economy runs on the same input. Compute, AI, robotics, manufacturing, transport... it's all energy underneath. That matters now because of demographics. Fewer workers every year means the economy only grows if output per head grows fast, and the engine for that is the Exponential Age... AI and robotics doing the work people used to. But all of that runs on energy. So the cost of energy is the ceiling on the whole thing. That's why the EU, Japan, China, the US and the UK are all moving at the same time. If we can take the cost of energy to near zero, GDP per capita stops being hostage to the price of a barrel of oil. That's the way out of this mess.

Everything in the economy runs on the same input. Compute, AI, robotics, manufacturing, transport... it's all energy underneath. That matters now because of demographics. Fewer workers every year means the economy only grows if output per head grows fast, and the engine for that is the Exponential Age... AI and robotics doing the work people used to. But all of that runs on energy. So the cost of energy is the ceiling on the whole thing. That's why the EU, Japan, China, the US and the UK are all moving at the same time. If we can take the cost of energy to near zero, GDP per capita stops being hostage to the price of a barrel of oil. That's the way out of this mess.

Raoul Pal

122,299 次观看 • 1 个月前

ELON: WE’RE HEADING INTO A POST-WORK SOCIETY Elon shared his evolving view on higher education and the future of work, suggesting that traditional career paths may soon be obsolete as AI and robotics reshape human purpose. He said college may still have value, but for reasons that have nothing to do with employment: “I think if you want to go to college for social reasons, which is a reason to go, to be around people your own age in a learning environment, that’s fine. Will these skills be necessary in the future? Probably not, because we’re gonna be in like a post-work society. But I think if something’s of interest, it’s fine to go and study that. The sciences are the awesome sciences.” Elon’ vision echoes his earlier prediction that AI will make most human labor redundant, pushing society toward learning for curiosity, not survival. Source: Nikhil Kamath

ELON: WE’RE HEADING INTO A POST-WORK SOCIETY Elon shared his evolving view on higher education and the future of work, suggesting that traditional career paths may soon be obsolete as AI and robotics reshape human purpose. He said college may still have value, but for reasons that have nothing to do with employment: “I think if you want to go to college for social reasons, which is a reason to go, to be around people your own age in a learning environment, that’s fine. Will these skills be necessary in the future? Probably not, because we’re gonna be in like a post-work society. But I think if something’s of interest, it’s fine to go and study that. The sciences are the awesome sciences.” Elon’ vision echoes his earlier prediction that AI will make most human labor redundant, pushing society toward learning for curiosity, not survival. Source: Nikhil Kamath

Mario Nawfal

31,965 次观看 • 8 个月前

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

The All-In Podcast

54,862 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨HARSH TRUTH: AI WILL TAKE YOUR JOB!!! And Elon Musk thinks that might actually be a good thing. Sounds crazy at first. But his logic is simple. Most people don’t work because they love their job. They work because they have to. Rent. Food. Bills. That’s the deal. Your job was never really your dream. It was the price of survival. Elon believes AI and robots could eventually break that deal. And he’s not just talking about it. He’s actively building the technology that could make it happen. Tesla is building Optimus, a humanoid robot designed to do physical labor. Tesla’s AI is being trained to automate more and more real world tasks. Starlink is bringing internet to places that never had access before. And SpaceX is pushing the cost of launching things into space lower than ever. All of this points to one direction. A world where machines produce far more than humans ever could. If machines produce almost everything, the cost of producing things collapses. And when production becomes incredibly cheap, the cost of living drops with it. Elon compares the future of money to air. Nobody checks their bank account to see if they still have air. It’s just there. One day, he believes money could feel the same way. He calls it Universal High Income. Not just survival payments. A world where the basics of life become abundant. Food. Housing. Healthcare. But Elon isn’t celebrating this future. He’s worried about something else. Because once machines can do everything better than humans, money stops being the biggest problem. The real problem becomes meaning. For most people, work is where their sense of value comes from. Their role. Their identity. Their reason to feel useful. Take that away and a lot of people won’t know who they are. As Elon once said: “If the computer can do everything better than you, does your life have meaning?” AI might solve the money problem. But it could create the biggest meaning crisis in human history.

🚨HARSH TRUTH: AI WILL TAKE YOUR JOB!!! And Elon Musk thinks that might actually be a good thing. Sounds crazy at first. But his logic is simple. Most people don’t work because they love their job. They work because they have to. Rent. Food. Bills. That’s the deal. Your job was never really your dream. It was the price of survival. Elon believes AI and robots could eventually break that deal. And he’s not just talking about it. He’s actively building the technology that could make it happen. Tesla is building Optimus, a humanoid robot designed to do physical labor. Tesla’s AI is being trained to automate more and more real world tasks. Starlink is bringing internet to places that never had access before. And SpaceX is pushing the cost of launching things into space lower than ever. All of this points to one direction. A world where machines produce far more than humans ever could. If machines produce almost everything, the cost of producing things collapses. And when production becomes incredibly cheap, the cost of living drops with it. Elon compares the future of money to air. Nobody checks their bank account to see if they still have air. It’s just there. One day, he believes money could feel the same way. He calls it Universal High Income. Not just survival payments. A world where the basics of life become abundant. Food. Housing. Healthcare. But Elon isn’t celebrating this future. He’s worried about something else. Because once machines can do everything better than humans, money stops being the biggest problem. The real problem becomes meaning. For most people, work is where their sense of value comes from. Their role. Their identity. Their reason to feel useful. Take that away and a lot of people won’t know who they are. As Elon once said: “If the computer can do everything better than you, does your life have meaning?” AI might solve the money problem. But it could create the biggest meaning crisis in human history.

Evan Luthra

23,003 次观看 • 5 个月前

BOMBSHELL: Coach Tuberville just CALLED OUT the Senate GOP for putting on a "SHOW WEEK" instead of doing what it takes to pass the SAVE America Act. "We can't get it passed, and it's probably one of the most CRUCIAL pieces of legislation that we will face." "We can't get anything done. We even have Republicans that are not going to vote for it. [The] talking filibuster is not going to work. The only way we can do it, we got to bust the filibuster, 51 votes, get this done, [we must] pass everything we can for President Trump between now and the election next year, and we can take this country back over." "But if we don't get this passed, we are doomed." Senator Tuberville says it like it is and we need more like him in DC. He will be missed in the Senate, but the people of Alabama will be blessed to have him as Governor.

BOMBSHELL: Coach Tuberville just CALLED OUT the Senate GOP for putting on a "SHOW WEEK" instead of doing what it takes to pass the SAVE America Act. "We can't get it passed, and it's probably one of the most CRUCIAL pieces of legislation that we will face." "We can't get anything done. We even have Republicans that are not going to vote for it. [The] talking filibuster is not going to work. The only way we can do it, we got to bust the filibuster, 51 votes, get this done, [we must] pass everything we can for President Trump between now and the election next year, and we can take this country back over." "But if we don't get this passed, we are doomed." Senator Tuberville says it like it is and we need more like him in DC. He will be missed in the Senate, but the people of Alabama will be blessed to have him as Governor.

Andrew Kolvet

108,971 次观看 • 5 个月前

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸 Elon: in 10 years, 90% of all distance driven will be driven by AI, and owning your own car will be a niche thing. He expects humanoid robots to be pretty much everywhere in the same timeframe, and says the economic output of a world with highly productive robots could be 10 to 100 times bigger than today. His term for it: not universal basic income, but universal high income, where pretty much anyone can have whatever they want. The cars drive themselves, the robots do the work, and everyone gets rich. That's the pitch. Source: Samson International Smart Mobility Summit, Elon Musk

🇺🇸 Elon: in 10 years, 90% of all distance driven will be driven by AI, and owning your own car will be a niche thing. He expects humanoid robots to be pretty much everywhere in the same timeframe, and says the economic output of a world with highly productive robots could be 10 to 100 times bigger than today. His term for it: not universal basic income, but universal high income, where pretty much anyone can have whatever they want. The cars drive themselves, the robots do the work, and everyone gets rich. That's the pitch. Source: Samson International Smart Mobility Summit, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

123,342 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jensen Huang just shared a massive insight on The All-In Podcast predicting a 1000000x scale up in AI. His logic is brilliant. Moving from simple chatbots to autonomous agents takes 10000x more compute. And because people gladly pay for actual work rather than just text generation the market consumption will grow 100x. But there is a hidden bottleneck in this vision that few are talking about. If agents are doing the actual work they will become the primary consumers of compute data and external APIs. How do they pay for these resources? You cannot attach a traditional credit card to a machine executing thousands of micro tasks per second. The legacy financial system will simply break under the weight of massive machine to machine microtransactions. To truly unlock Jensen's million fold expansion AI needs its own native economic layer. Agents must be able to route intents and settle costs autonomously in real time. This is the exact infrastructure we are building at Kite AI. The future of work is agentic and the Agent Economy requires entirely new financial rails. 🪁

Jensen Huang just shared a massive insight on The All-In Podcast predicting a 1000000x scale up in AI. His logic is brilliant. Moving from simple chatbots to autonomous agents takes 10000x more compute. And because people gladly pay for actual work rather than just text generation the market consumption will grow 100x. But there is a hidden bottleneck in this vision that few are talking about. If agents are doing the actual work they will become the primary consumers of compute data and external APIs. How do they pay for these resources? You cannot attach a traditional credit card to a machine executing thousands of micro tasks per second. The legacy financial system will simply break under the weight of massive machine to machine microtransactions. To truly unlock Jensen's million fold expansion AI needs its own native economic layer. Agents must be able to route intents and settle costs autonomously in real time. This is the exact infrastructure we are building at Kite AI. The future of work is agentic and the Agent Economy requires entirely new financial rails. 🪁

KITE AI

20,474 次观看 • 4 个月前

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID will never work as advertised, not only because keeping us safe is not... its intended function, but also... because too many people have learned that fundamental lesson of the last few years, which is to say it's never about what they say it's about." "Digital ID isn't about keeping us safe. It's about keeping us where they can see us. Where we can't move or do anything without permission in advance. Too many people see and understand, and this is why it won't work." "Too many have seen and understood that the motive behind the deliberate and cynical flooding of Britain, and of Europe, with people from outside... is designed primarily to create fear and division—fear and division that, as the oligarchs would have it, can only be fixed by digital ID for all." "Digital ID... won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe—safe from us." "Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be about making this country and the people living in it safe. But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place, and for this people." Credit: Neil Oliver

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID will never work as advertised, not only because keeping us safe is not... its intended function, but also... because too many people have learned that fundamental lesson of the last few years, which is to say it's never about what they say it's about." "Digital ID isn't about keeping us safe. It's about keeping us where they can see us. Where we can't move or do anything without permission in advance. Too many people see and understand, and this is why it won't work." "Too many have seen and understood that the motive behind the deliberate and cynical flooding of Britain, and of Europe, with people from outside... is designed primarily to create fear and division—fear and division that, as the oligarchs would have it, can only be fixed by digital ID for all." "Digital ID... won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe—safe from us." "Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be about making this country and the people living in it safe. But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place, and for this people." Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

48,382 次观看 • 10 个月前

#WATCH | On L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan advocates a 90-hour work week, Mahindra Group Chairman Anand Mahindra says, "I have a huge respect for Narayan Murthy and others. So let me not get this wrong. But I have to say something. I think this debate is in the wrong direction because this debate is about the quantity of work. My point is we have to focus on the quality of work, not on the quantity of work. So it's not about 40 hours, or 70 hours or 90 hours. What output are you doing even if it's 10 hours? You can change the world in 10 hours... I have always believed that you have to have leaders and people in your company who make wise decisions and wise choices. So the question is, which kind of mindmakes the right choices and right decisions? And I think a mind that is exposed to holistic thinking, thinking that is open to inputs from around the world, that's when you'll make a good decision. If you don't spend time at home, if you're not spending time with friends, not reading, and don't have time to reflect, how will you bring the right inputs into making a decision?... I don't want it to be about quantity. Ask me what's the quality of my work. Don't ask me how many hours I work...."

#WATCH | On L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan advocates a 90-hour work week, Mahindra Group Chairman Anand Mahindra says, "I have a huge respect for Narayan Murthy and others. So let me not get this wrong. But I have to say something. I think this debate is in the wrong direction because this debate is about the quantity of work. My point is we have to focus on the quality of work, not on the quantity of work. So it's not about 40 hours, or 70 hours or 90 hours. What output are you doing even if it's 10 hours? You can change the world in 10 hours... I have always believed that you have to have leaders and people in your company who make wise decisions and wise choices. So the question is, which kind of mindmakes the right choices and right decisions? And I think a mind that is exposed to holistic thinking, thinking that is open to inputs from around the world, that's when you'll make a good decision. If you don't spend time at home, if you're not spending time with friends, not reading, and don't have time to reflect, how will you bring the right inputs into making a decision?... I don't want it to be about quantity. Ask me what's the quality of my work. Don't ask me how many hours I work...."

ANI

102,689 次观看 • 1 年前