正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Engineers ended up replacing AI because they are cheaper

2,924,260 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

41 条评论

Chris 的头像
Chris4 个月前

@Bill_2140 As we famously know technology never gets cheaper

Jorge Castillo 的头像
Jorge Castillo4 个月前

@Bill_2140 The strategy of every big tech sass. Cheap first, then raise prices.

Chronos 的头像
Chronos4 个月前

It should never have been about replacing. It should have been how can we use this tool to be more productive and therefor make the company more profitable. Which processes, which departments, which workflows etc ? Mass adopting the tool without plan or with a bad plan hurts the pocket.

Jorge Castillo 的头像
Jorge Castillo4 个月前

@hilvara_cw It’s absolutely a tool and one must think about tokens. People relax too much regarding that when they are in company plan.

Chronos 的头像
Chronos4 个月前

Exactly. But more than people I would put emphasis on the fact that managers should be briefed and they should have a very thoughtful oversight about it's usage. It's a new tool, it needs to be supervised more than other tools.

Aal 的头像
Aal4 个月前

welcome back to stackoverflow

Priyansh Agarwal 的头像
Priyansh Agarwal4 个月前

😂😂😭😭

CyberThreatIntel🇺🇸🦅 的头像
CyberThreatIntel🇺🇸🦅4 个月前

No, they don’t want to use a competitors more expensive product when they have a 27% stake in OpenAI. They are having those engineers use Copilot (ChatGPT with a wrapper) and OpenAI. Thats not replacing AI, they’re just using a cheaper alternative they already have massive investment in. Simple business

Priyansh Singhal 的头像
Priyansh Singhal4 个月前

engineers are cheaper than 30-turn loops. type errors cascade and a 3-turn refactor becomes 30. budget blows on loop depth, not model price. cap the depth and the math flips back.

Tobias Sherman 的头像
Tobias Sherman4 个月前

I cannot believe people believe this hot garbage take. PPL cannot be this dumb. Microsoft, creator of the "zune" ran up a high ai build bc they can't fix bad company culture with ai. Shocker.

Govind 的头像
Govind4 个月前

😂 Classic hype cycle in action. Microsoft didn't "ban AI" they just cancelled the expensive Claude Code licenses after devs went HAM on it and the token bill exploded. Now everyone's back on GitHub Copilot (their own cheaper stack). Translation: AI is still eating code, just on Microsoft's terms and wallet. Unit economics always slap harder than the demo videos. This a temporary growing pain or the first crack in the "AI will 10x everything tomorrow" narrative? Who's seeing similar cost drama in their org? 👀

𝕏 的头像
𝕏4 个月前

Microsoft spent billions hyping AI as the ultimate job-killer and now their own engineers are cheaper than the token bill. AI bros went from “we’re all gonna be obsolete” to “please hire me, I’m more cost-effective than Claude” in record time. The bubble is healing guys 🤣

Zuki Muki 的头像
Zuki Muki4 个月前

“An engineer is someone who can do for a dime what any fool can do for a dollar.” They give Claude to fools who need 100 prompts to do what an expert can do with 10 prompts. Get rid of the fools not AI

Santos Ray Victorero, II 的头像
Santos Ray Victorero, II4 个月前

Yes, the hype is over!

mmm ethmatic 的头像
mmm ethmatic4 个月前

Ai (an Indian) is cheaper than Ai (artificial intelligence)

Pinak Singhania 的头像
Pinak Singhania4 个月前

Called it

River over troubled bridges 的头像
River over troubled bridges4 个月前

This simply isn't true. MS is just moving to their own internal model vs Claude.

Alexandru G. 的头像
Alexandru G.4 个月前

Funny how quickly the narrative flips. The question isn't whether AI replaces engineers - it's whether companies actually understand what they're paying for when they adopt it. Most don't

Jorge Castillo 的头像
Jorge Castillo4 个月前

Very true, very often. Many CEOs blindly believed the fallacy of AI being able to replace real people and to save them money. Not going to happen.

Alexandru G. 的头像
Alexandru G.4 个月前

Replacing people was always the wrong goal. The companies quietly using AI to make their existing teams 3x more effective are the ones worth watching. Most CEOs missed that framing entirely

Nik Knack ☕ 的头像
Nik Knack ☕4 个月前

Me when I only read headlines

ΙϹΗΙΞ🫆 的头像
ΙϹΗΙΞ🫆4 个月前

We’ve gone full-circle in under 3 years

Jorge Castillo 的头像
Jorge Castillo4 个月前

Uses to happen when expectations become so unrealistic so quickly.

Modumedi 的头像
Modumedi4 个月前

@Thapelo_Rampolo

arthurito 的头像
arthurito4 个月前

@httpguih kkkk

InfernoZard 的头像
InfernoZard4 个月前

lesggoo we won guys

Ashlee🥰 的头像
Ashlee🥰3 个月前

Fb immediately

PULKIT 的头像
PULKIT4 个月前

Guess WHAT

Ms. Katchadourian🙃 的头像
Ms. Katchadourian🙃4 个月前

Microsoft is literally just moving to Copilot AI…which is their in-house AI.

Wisdom Chukwuma 的头像
Wisdom Chukwuma4 个月前

The Ai coming back for Microsoft like

Morgan | Alpha Hunter 的头像
Morgan | Alpha Hunter4 个月前

yo the plot twist here

DotDot 的头像
DotDot4 个月前

If we abandon manual labor, how will people pay for these goods when their wages are insufficient for living expenses? It feels like we're trapped in a vicious cycle.

Manpreet 的头像
Manpreet4 个月前

Been there. My team burned through Claude budget in two weeks like it was free candy. Switched back to Copilot and suddenly we’re 'optimizing costs' again. Classic.

AlfaX 的头像
AlfaX4 个月前

calm down engineer save the world

David J Architect 的头像
David J Architect4 个月前

not really.

Picked By Nik 的头像
Picked By Nik4 个月前

What happens when embodied AI hits?

JN0K404 的头像
JN0K4044 个月前

Engineers are so back

Bud C. 🇺🇸 的头像
Bud C. 🇺🇸4 个月前

Its because AI makes a lot of errors and it take more manpower to fix those errors than to just have people write all the code from the start. Eventually this will no longer be the case.

Jay Naidu 的头像
Jay Naidu4 个月前

Turns out we have one big advantage over AI: we don’t charge per token 💀

Veronica 的头像
Veronica4 个月前

I love this.

Ashwini 的头像
Ashwini4 个月前

The most expensive intern in history.

相关视频