正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Engineers ended up replacing AI because they are cheaper
41 条评论

@Bill_2140 As we famously know technology never gets cheaper

@Bill_2140 The strategy of every big tech sass. Cheap first, then raise prices.

It should never have been about replacing. It should have been how can we use this tool to be more productive and therefor make the company more profitable. Which processes, which departments, which workflows etc ? Mass adopting the tool without plan or with a bad plan hurts the pocket.

@hilvara_cw It’s absolutely a tool and one must think about tokens. People relax too much regarding that when they are in company plan.

Exactly. But more than people I would put emphasis on the fact that managers should be briefed and they should have a very thoughtful oversight about it's usage. It's a new tool, it needs to be supervised more than other tools.

welcome back to stackoverflow

😂😂😭😭

No, they don’t want to use a competitors more expensive product when they have a 27% stake in OpenAI. They are having those engineers use Copilot (ChatGPT with a wrapper) and OpenAI. Thats not replacing AI, they’re just using a cheaper alternative they already have massive investment in. Simple business

engineers are cheaper than 30-turn loops. type errors cascade and a 3-turn refactor becomes 30. budget blows on loop depth, not model price. cap the depth and the math flips back.

I cannot believe people believe this hot garbage take. PPL cannot be this dumb. Microsoft, creator of the "zune" ran up a high ai build bc they can't fix bad company culture with ai. Shocker.

😂 Classic hype cycle in action. Microsoft didn't "ban AI" they just cancelled the expensive Claude Code licenses after devs went HAM on it and the token bill exploded. Now everyone's back on GitHub Copilot (their own cheaper stack). Translation: AI is still eating code, just on Microsoft's terms and wallet. Unit economics always slap harder than the demo videos. This a temporary growing pain or the first crack in the "AI will 10x everything tomorrow" narrative? Who's seeing similar cost drama in their org? 👀

Microsoft spent billions hyping AI as the ultimate job-killer and now their own engineers are cheaper than the token bill. AI bros went from “we’re all gonna be obsolete” to “please hire me, I’m more cost-effective than Claude” in record time. The bubble is healing guys 🤣

“An engineer is someone who can do for a dime what any fool can do for a dollar.” They give Claude to fools who need 100 prompts to do what an expert can do with 10 prompts. Get rid of the fools not AI

Yes, the hype is over!

Ai (an Indian) is cheaper than Ai (artificial intelligence)

Called it

This simply isn't true. MS is just moving to their own internal model vs Claude.

Funny how quickly the narrative flips. The question isn't whether AI replaces engineers - it's whether companies actually understand what they're paying for when they adopt it. Most don't

Very true, very often. Many CEOs blindly believed the fallacy of AI being able to replace real people and to save them money. Not going to happen.

Replacing people was always the wrong goal. The companies quietly using AI to make their existing teams 3x more effective are the ones worth watching. Most CEOs missed that framing entirely

Me when I only read headlines

We’ve gone full-circle in under 3 years

Uses to happen when expectations become so unrealistic so quickly.

@Thapelo_Rampolo

@httpguih kkkk

lesggoo we won guys

Fb immediately

Guess WHAT

Microsoft is literally just moving to Copilot AI…which is their in-house AI.

The Ai coming back for Microsoft like

yo the plot twist here

If we abandon manual labor, how will people pay for these goods when their wages are insufficient for living expenses? It feels like we're trapped in a vicious cycle.

Been there. My team burned through Claude budget in two weeks like it was free candy. Switched back to Copilot and suddenly we’re 'optimizing costs' again. Classic.

calm down engineer save the world

not really.

What happens when embodied AI hits?

Engineers are so back

Its because AI makes a lot of errors and it take more manpower to fix those errors than to just have people write all the code from the start. Eventually this will no longer be the case.

Turns out we have one big advantage over AI: we don’t charge per token 💀

I love this.

The most expensive intern in history.

