Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Engineers ended up replacing AI because they are cheaper

2,924,329 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

41 Kommentare

Profilbild von Chris
Chrisvor 4 Monaten

@Bill_2140 As we famously know technology never gets cheaper

Profilbild von Jorge Castillo
Jorge Castillovor 4 Monaten

@Bill_2140 The strategy of every big tech sass. Cheap first, then raise prices.

Profilbild von Chronos
Chronosvor 4 Monaten

It should never have been about replacing. It should have been how can we use this tool to be more productive and therefor make the company more profitable. Which processes, which departments, which workflows etc ? Mass adopting the tool without plan or with a bad plan hurts the pocket.

Profilbild von Jorge Castillo
Jorge Castillovor 4 Monaten

@hilvara_cw It’s absolutely a tool and one must think about tokens. People relax too much regarding that when they are in company plan.

Profilbild von Chronos
Chronosvor 4 Monaten

Exactly. But more than people I would put emphasis on the fact that managers should be briefed and they should have a very thoughtful oversight about it's usage. It's a new tool, it needs to be supervised more than other tools.

Profilbild von Aal
Aalvor 4 Monaten

welcome back to stackoverflow

Profilbild von Priyansh Agarwal
Priyansh Agarwalvor 4 Monaten

😂😂😭😭

Profilbild von CyberThreatIntel🇺🇸🦅
CyberThreatIntel🇺🇸🦅vor 4 Monaten

No, they don’t want to use a competitors more expensive product when they have a 27% stake in OpenAI. They are having those engineers use Copilot (ChatGPT with a wrapper) and OpenAI. Thats not replacing AI, they’re just using a cheaper alternative they already have massive investment in. Simple business

Profilbild von Priyansh Singhal
Priyansh Singhalvor 4 Monaten

engineers are cheaper than 30-turn loops. type errors cascade and a 3-turn refactor becomes 30. budget blows on loop depth, not model price. cap the depth and the math flips back.

Profilbild von Tobias Sherman
Tobias Shermanvor 4 Monaten

I cannot believe people believe this hot garbage take. PPL cannot be this dumb. Microsoft, creator of the "zune" ran up a high ai build bc they can't fix bad company culture with ai. Shocker.

Profilbild von Govind
Govindvor 4 Monaten

😂 Classic hype cycle in action. Microsoft didn't "ban AI" they just cancelled the expensive Claude Code licenses after devs went HAM on it and the token bill exploded. Now everyone's back on GitHub Copilot (their own cheaper stack). Translation: AI is still eating code, just on Microsoft's terms and wallet. Unit economics always slap harder than the demo videos. This a temporary growing pain or the first crack in the "AI will 10x everything tomorrow" narrative? Who's seeing similar cost drama in their org? 👀

Profilbild von 𝕏
𝕏vor 4 Monaten

Microsoft spent billions hyping AI as the ultimate job-killer and now their own engineers are cheaper than the token bill. AI bros went from “we’re all gonna be obsolete” to “please hire me, I’m more cost-effective than Claude” in record time. The bubble is healing guys 🤣

Profilbild von Zuki Muki
Zuki Mukivor 4 Monaten

“An engineer is someone who can do for a dime what any fool can do for a dollar.” They give Claude to fools who need 100 prompts to do what an expert can do with 10 prompts. Get rid of the fools not AI

Profilbild von Santos Ray Victorero, II
Santos Ray Victorero, IIvor 4 Monaten

Yes, the hype is over!

Profilbild von mmm ethmatic
mmm ethmaticvor 4 Monaten

Ai (an Indian) is cheaper than Ai (artificial intelligence)

Profilbild von Pinak Singhania
Pinak Singhaniavor 4 Monaten

Called it

Profilbild von River over troubled bridges
River over troubled bridgesvor 4 Monaten

This simply isn't true. MS is just moving to their own internal model vs Claude.

Profilbild von Alexandru G.
Alexandru G.vor 4 Monaten

Funny how quickly the narrative flips. The question isn't whether AI replaces engineers - it's whether companies actually understand what they're paying for when they adopt it. Most don't

Profilbild von Jorge Castillo
Jorge Castillovor 4 Monaten

Very true, very often. Many CEOs blindly believed the fallacy of AI being able to replace real people and to save them money. Not going to happen.

Profilbild von Alexandru G.
Alexandru G.vor 4 Monaten

Replacing people was always the wrong goal. The companies quietly using AI to make their existing teams 3x more effective are the ones worth watching. Most CEOs missed that framing entirely

Profilbild von Nik Knack ☕
Nik Knack ☕vor 4 Monaten

Me when I only read headlines

Profilbild von ΙϹΗΙΞ🫆
ΙϹΗΙΞ🫆vor 4 Monaten

We’ve gone full-circle in under 3 years

Profilbild von Jorge Castillo
Jorge Castillovor 4 Monaten

Uses to happen when expectations become so unrealistic so quickly.

Profilbild von Modumedi
Modumedivor 4 Monaten

@Thapelo_Rampolo

Profilbild von arthurito
arthuritovor 4 Monaten

@httpguih kkkk

Profilbild von InfernoZard
InfernoZardvor 4 Monaten

lesggoo we won guys

Profilbild von Ashlee🥰
Ashlee🥰vor 3 Monaten

Fb immediately

Profilbild von PULKIT
PULKITvor 4 Monaten

Guess WHAT

Profilbild von Ms. Katchadourian🙃
Ms. Katchadourian🙃vor 4 Monaten

Microsoft is literally just moving to Copilot AI…which is their in-house AI.

Profilbild von Wisdom Chukwuma
Wisdom Chukwumavor 4 Monaten

The Ai coming back for Microsoft like

Profilbild von Morgan | Alpha Hunter
Morgan | Alpha Huntervor 4 Monaten

yo the plot twist here

Profilbild von DotDot
DotDotvor 4 Monaten

If we abandon manual labor, how will people pay for these goods when their wages are insufficient for living expenses? It feels like we're trapped in a vicious cycle.

Profilbild von Manpreet
Manpreetvor 4 Monaten

Been there. My team burned through Claude budget in two weeks like it was free candy. Switched back to Copilot and suddenly we’re 'optimizing costs' again. Classic.

Profilbild von AlfaX
AlfaXvor 4 Monaten

calm down engineer save the world

Profilbild von David J Architect
David J Architectvor 4 Monaten

not really.

Profilbild von Picked By Nik
Picked By Nikvor 4 Monaten

What happens when embodied AI hits?

Profilbild von JN0K404
JN0K404vor 4 Monaten

Engineers are so back

Profilbild von Bud C. 🇺🇸
Bud C. 🇺🇸vor 4 Monaten

Its because AI makes a lot of errors and it take more manpower to fix those errors than to just have people write all the code from the start. Eventually this will no longer be the case.

Profilbild von Jay Naidu
Jay Naiduvor 4 Monaten

Turns out we have one big advantage over AI: we don’t charge per token 💀

Profilbild von Veronica
Veronicavor 4 Monaten

I love this.

Profilbild von Ashwini
Ashwinivor 4 Monaten

The most expensive intern in history.

Ähnliche Videos