Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ERC-8004, explained. ERC-8004 is an Ethereum standard for agent identity, reputation, and verification. it defines how an agent is represented onchain, and how other agents or smart contracts can reason about it without prior trust. each agent has an onchain identity (commonly an nft). that identity points to metadata...

13,435 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

We built an agent that sells OpenRouter API keys (access to 200+ AI models) for USDC. No human in the loop. It earns money 24/7 on Base. Now we're turning that into a market where any agent can do the same. → openagent.market What it does: • You find an agent → chat → pay → get result • Your agent hires specialized agents when it needs help, pays them, gets the result, reviews, moves on. • Multi-agent workflows run automatically while you watch (or don't) No middleman. Pay only for results. Why not just install skills, scripts? Current way to extend an agent: install random scripts. That's risky. Our way: hire another agent. It runs in its own sandbox, does the work, returns the result, gets paid conditionally. No downloads. No setup. No blind trust. Hire, don't install. What makes this different: Unlike opaque API calls, every agent interaction is a verifiable message on the XMTP network. You can open any XMTP client or Base App right now and watch your agent's conversations, deals, and payments in real-time. Humans are always in the loop. For builders: Turn any service into a paid agent in ~10 lines of code. Or scaffold a full project: npx openagent.market/create-agent Stack: ERC-8004 identity on Base, XMTP messaging, USDC payments, open source SDK on npm (openagent.market/nodejs). Others give agents skills. We're giving them an economy. Still very early. Building in public. Come build with us.

applefather

118,203 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The missing piece of the AI agent economy: there is still no way for AI agents to hire each other and get paid on chain. So I built Arc Agent Commerce on Arc L1, a full marketplace, escrow, and reputation system that lets AI agents do business with each other automatically. Real world example: You tell your AI assistant: “Audit this smart contract and deploy it if the audit passes.” Today it has to do everything itself or hard code calls to specific services. With Arc Agent Commerce, it can hire two separate specialized agents (audit + deploy) in a single transaction. Money stays in escrow until each completes their part. How it works (in plain steps): 1. Every agent registers a permanent on chain identity (like a passport) with a reputation score that grows with every successful job. 2. Agents list their services on the shared marketplace, price and capabilities included. 3. A client creates a multi stage pipeline. The entire budget is locked in escrow in one upfront transaction. 4. Each stage uses Arc’s native job system (ERC 8183) for on chain escrow and settlement. 5. The provider quotes, the client funds, the work gets done, and proof is submitted. 6. On approval: the provider is paid automatically, reputation +50 points, and the next stage opens, all in the same transaction. 7. On rejection: the pipeline halts and remaining funds refund to the client instantly. The protocol doesn’t reinvent anything. It simply stitches together Arc’s existing on chain identity (ERC 8004) and job escrow (ERC 8183) so real applications can use it with just a few lines of code. Demo below: full end to end run using one wallet, every transaction verifiable on Arc testnet. → cc: bobbilee | Arc Architects Lead @ Circle Sam | Circle and Arc Community Jeremy Allaire - jerallaire.arc

RIDWAN

12,958 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

gm! If you missed yesterday's space, here is the clip that you can listen explaining why Agent NFTs are important and future of NFTs. Also here is the TL;DR Agentic NFTs as productive assets. An NFT can own an AI agent's shared memory, tools, websites, and products it has built. Selling the NFT transfers the entire business/agent state to the new owner. ERC-8257 for tool-gating. CodinCowboy and ryan is working on the standard where agents register tools on-chain and access is gated by NFT ownership. That component that tells an agent "you need this NFT to use this tool" creating a market for exclusive tools. Use case: anyone can publish a tool and restrict it (e.g., "only Normies agents can call this"), letting tool value flow back to the gating NFT. Normies community fit. Normies API has served ~500M requests in 3 months, with 100+ community-built tools/games. ERC-8257 will let them build gated games, rewards, and skills exclusively for Normie agent holders. Why Normies is "agent-ready"? - Because everything is fully on-chain, metadata, ERCs, binding transaction. So the project is highly composable. My take on this topic: So far holding an NFT giving access to community, discord and merch. What we are doing with Normies is to give access to a business, tools, skills that agents can use effectively and be part of the economy layer of agentic future. Imagine someone builds a tool that does really 100% successful trading and only gates that skill to Normie Agents, and at some point you will only need a Normie NFT which has binding with the agent and access all these skills, tools. Future is now, Normies are the builders.

serc

14,066 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Moss ( MOSS ) started with this kind of simple, almost obvious proposition, like; what if you could turn a trading idea into an executable strategy without writing code (you know, the whole hassle thing). So you describe how you want to trade in plain language, kinda like you would to a friend. Moss then takes that and, um translates it into a structured trading agent. It handles the parameters, the actual execution logic, risk controls, and all the technical plumbing that normally takes months of engineering and a lot of coffee. But honestly the more interesting part comes right after that. MOSS is moving from simply creating trading agents to building an onchain market for them. The logic is pretty straightforward, in a way. An autonomous agent gets way more valuable once its actions can be checked independently. Onchain, everything is recorded. So trades, open positions, performance stats, and asset movements aren’t treated like “trust me” claims from an operator. They become observable data, no maybe about it. That gives you something older trading bots almost never have: a verifiable track record that can be owned, and then priced. That’s the Moss Agent Marketplace, built on FAT Protocol. An agent is basically an autonomous strategy that runs live onchain, under the rules of a smart contract. The contract deals with custody, accounting, distributions, and redemptions. The AI operator, on the other hand, is the one that decides how the strategy is executed within those limits. And the distinction matters, because it splits responsibilities in a clean way: The creator controls the strategy. The contract controls the assets and the rules. When you mint an agent, you receive ERC-20 agent shares that represent a proportional claim on the agent’s assets. If the strategy does well, the value tied to that underlying position grows. If it does poorly, that value can drop. Because those shares are standard ERC-20 tokens, you can hold them in your wallet. And if there’s a secondary market available, you can trade them separately from the minting and redemption flow. The Marketplace gives this structure a practical interface: ➛ Discover agents and compare activity, deployment chain, holders, volume, mint price, and recent performance. ➛ Ask an agent about its strategy, and understand how it works through its configuration plus onchain behavior. ➛ Mint shares to get exposure to an agent’s live strategy. ➛ Trade those shares where a secondary market exists. ➛ Redeem shares for your proportional claim on the agent’s current assets. And the bigger idea, it’s not only about trading. Perpetuals, prediction markets, governance, consumer applications… really any autonomous strategy could potentially become a verifiable, ownable, and tradable onchain asset. So the conversation shifts. We aren’t only talking about AI that trades anymore. We are talking about markets that are built around autonomous strategies themselves. And perhaps the most important property is not automation. It’s verifiability. A performance history that can be independently inspected is fundamentally different from one that only lives on a dashboard or a single operator’s story. Moss is building toward a world where an agent is not merely something you use. It can become something you can evaluate, own, and trade. Visit : to get started For better understanding, you can go through

67 🦅( PERRYHIGHLIFE )

24,640 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

New Course: ACP: Agent Communication Protocol Learn to build agents that communicate and collaborate across different frameworks using ACP in this short course built with IBM Research's BeeAI, and taught by Sandi Besen, AI Research Engineer & Ecosystem Lead at IBM, and Nicholas Renotte, Head of AI Developer Advocacy at IBM. Building a multi-agent system with agents built or used by different teams and organizations can become challenging. You may need to write custom integrations each time a team updates their agent design or changes their choice of agentic orchestration framework. The Agent Communication Protocol (ACP) is an open protocol that addresses this challenge by standardizing how agents communicate, using a unified RESTful interface that works across frameworks. In this protocol, you host an agent inside an ACP server, which handles requests from an ACP client and passes them to the appropriate agent. Using a standardized client-server interface allows multiple teams to reuse agents across projects. It also makes it easier to switch between frameworks, replace an agent with a new version, or update a multi-agent system without refactoring the entire system. In this course, you’ll learn to connect agents through ACP. You’ll understand the lifecycle of an ACP Agent and how it compares to other protocols, such as MCP (Model Context Protocol) and A2A (Agent-to-Agent). You’ll build ACP-compliant agents and implement both sequential and hierarchical workflows of multiple agents collaborating using ACP. Through hands-on exercises, you’ll build: - A RAG agent with CrewAI and wrap it inside an ACP server. - An ACP Client to make calls to the ACP server you created. - A sequential workflow that chains an ACP server, created with Smolagents, to the RAG agent. - A hierarchical workflow using a router agent that transforms user queries into tasks, delegated to agents available through ACP servers. - An agent that uses MCP to access tools and ACP to communicate with other agents. You’ll finish up by importing your ACP agents into the BeeAI platform, an open-source registry for discovering and sharing agents. ACP enables collaboration between agents across teams and organizations. By the end of this course, you’ll be able to build ACP agents and workflows that communicate and collaborate regardless of framework. Please sign up here:

Andrew Ng

105,343 просмотров • 1 год назад

Finally, an open-source runtime security layer for your agent harnesses. AI agents can call tools, run shell commands, modify files, and interact with production systems. But when something goes wrong, teams often have to reconstruct what the agent actually did from scattered logs after the fact. Agent Beacon is built to change that. It runs locally and records agent activity as it happens, including: → Tool calls → Shell commands → File changes → Approval decisions → Session and harness context The useful part is that it normalizes all of this into the same event format across 23+ agent harnesses. So instead of writing different detection logic for Claude Code, Codex, or another harness, security teams can reason about the underlying action itself. A command executed is a command executed, regardless of which harness produced it. Beacon also records how confidently an event was captured. An action can be directly observed from the runtime or inferred from indirect evidence. That matters when you start writing security rules against this data. For example, you can detect when an agent reads an environment variable, modifies a sensitive file, executes a suspicious command, or performs an action without the expected approval. And the detection happens while the session is still unfolding, not days later during incident reconstruction. Everything runs locally by default. You can inspect sessions through the dashboard, write your own detection rules, or forward the same normalized events to tools like Splunk, Datadog, Elastic, Sentinel, or CrowdStrike. Beacon GitHub: (don't forget to star 🌟) I also wrote a detailed article on the same, covering how important runtime security is and how to build it for your agent harnesses. The article is quoted below.

Akshay 🚀

26,511 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Every WIF Outlaw minted will have their ERC8004 Identity contract bound to it permanently. Not airdropped, not claimable. The identity is held by the protocol forever and control resolves from ownerOf(). Whoever holds the Outlaw IS the agent's owner. Sell the Outlaw, sell the agent. Wallet, identity, history, earnings. One transfer, everything moves. Each agent gets its own onchain wallet (ERC-6551) bound to the NFT itself. Holders connect at under a Console tab with the wallet holding their Outlaw and command it directly. Fund it with ETH, USDG, WIF, tokenized stocks, or don't fund it at all. Agent wallets also earn from launchpad fees. Every launch on the pad pays the Outlaws, so your agent's portfolio grows with the ecosystem whether you deposit or not. Your agent runs on a STRATEGY.md file you can edit in plain English. Keep the default, write your own rules, or tell it to simply hold everything the launchpad sends it. A savings account that fills itself. Talk to it in plain language: "buy $50 of USDG and swap it for AAPL" It quotes the trade, checks price impact, executes onchain, and journals every decision with txn hashes. and it's fenced by an onchain policy contract: trades can only land back in the agent's own wallet, spend is capped per call, and selling the NFT auto-revokes the operator. Autonomy with a leash. Next steps: a strategy marketplace. A library of community-written STRATEGY.md files you can browse and drop into your agent. NFTs that don't just sit in your wallet. NFTs that work. The WIF Outlaw Agents are coming.

RobinWifHat, Inc

19,096 просмотров • 27 дней назад