正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Erika Kirk just dropped a bombshell at the Turning Point Educators Summit. She openly admitted she’s been studying other widows — watching how they grieve, how they raise their kids, how they “handle” their situation — because there’s “no blueprint” for hers. Most people don’t research grief like it’s...

15,157 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

‼️Erika Kirk Just Admitted She RESEARCHED Other WIDOWS to Figure Out HOW to Act😱 At the Turning Point Educators Summit today, Erika Kirk openly said she has been looking at other widows in similar situations to figure out how to handle her grief and raise her children. She said there’s “no blueprint” for her situation, so she’s been studying how other women have handled it. This is deeply strange. Most grieving widows don’t sit around researching how other widows behave so they can mimic the right “performance.” Genuine grief doesn’t usually involve studying other people’s trauma to figure out how you’re supposed to act in public. This gives off major Kouri Richins vibes — the woman who killed her husband and then tried to brand herself as the perfect grieving widow while writing children’s books about loss. It feels calculated, not organic. Erika has spent months being extremely public, highly produced, and carefully curated in her appearances. Now she’s admitting she’s been studying how to play the role of a grieving widow. That’s not how real grief works. Real grief is messy. It’s not researched. It’s not performed. And it certainly doesn’t involve studying other people’s pain so you can get your own presentation right. RT this. More people need to hear this. ⚠️My channel is under attack to silence my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you want to help keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

74,396 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨HOW IRONIC: Candace Owens ExXPOSES Matt Walsh’s Erika Kirk Double Standard - He Destroyed His OWN Defense Of Erika Kirk With This ONE Tweet⚖️🤫 Matt Walsh has spent weeks attacking anyone questioning the Erika Kirk timeline, calling it "immoral" to scrutinize a "grieving widow." But a single tweet regarding the Kouri Richins murder case in Utah just blew his entire logic apart. "The first minute is not the sound of a wife becoming a widow... it's the sound of a wife becoming a Black Widow." 🕷️🕸️ Candace Owens delivered a masterclass on why "circumstantial evidence" matters, reacting to Matt’s demand that Kouri Richins be "taken outside and hanged" based on the exact same red flags he tells us to ignore regarding Erika Kirk. The Parallel Realities: The "Grieving" Act: Kouri Richins played the "grieving widow" for a year—writing children's books and doing media tours—before she was caught. Her own friends turned on her, saying her behavior was "off." The Prosecution's Case: In the case Matt wants a hanging for, prosecutors couldn't even prove how the poison was administered. They won by "weaving together" financial distress, secret drug buys, and a widow who wasn't "grieving correctly." The Erika Kirk Red Flags: Candace refuses to ignore that Erika lied about the threats her husband faced the night before his death and fabricated quotes from a surgeon about a "Superman neck" to manage PR—on the very day of his funeral. The Bottom Line:Matt Walsh wants the rope for one widow based on circumstantial evidence but demands total silence for Erika Kirk. Why? As Candace says: "Grieving widows do not lie about threats their husbands faced... I know enough to know those things simply don’t make sense, and I refuse to pretend otherwise." Candace's Advice to all of citizen journalist investigating Charlie's death is to keep going MAX. Do it for Charlie. It's okay to get a story wrong.🕊️🔥 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT, and watch her FULL episode below.👇

Project Constitution

28,058 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨FROM WIFE TO PROP IN 90 DAYS: IS Erika Kirk Actually GRIEVING Or Just The New STAR Of Turning Point USA's Grief Porn CINEMATIC UNIVERSE? I’m not gonna sugarcoat it: everything about Erika Kirk right now feels like a professionally directed grief commercial, and I’m genuinely asking if any of it was ever real. Since Charlie Kirk’s death, Erika has been on a non-stop tour (podcasts, conferences, Trump hugs, perfectly lit prayer reels) turning her husband’s assassination into the most marketable trad-wife redemption arc we’ve ever seen. The tears always hit right when the camera zooms. The captions always drop the exact Bible verse the donor class wants to hear. She’s not just mourning; she’s the new face softening white Christian nationalism into something that feels gentle, maternal, safe… while pushing the exact same control agenda. And the wildest part? She’s not being forced into this role. She’s directing it. Every perfectly timed sob, every pastel “God’s plan” post, every stage appearance next to JD Vance and Trump is calculated to make extremism look nurturing instead of dangerous. This isn’t accidental. Movements like this ALWAYS need a beautiful weeping woman to absorb the criticism and sanctify the message. She’s the emotional human shield. The trad Madonna who makes patriarchy look like protection. And the second those tears stop being useful (the second she stops fitting the “marketable mourning” aesthetic), they’ll replace her faster than you can say “next trad-wife influencer.” So tell me: when your grief starts looking like an Adam & Eve photoshoot sponsored by Turning Point USA… is it still grief? Drop your thoughts below and tag someone who needs to see this before the next “holy widow” reel drops. 👀 ERIKA FRANTZVE Erika Kirk Candace Owens

Project Constitution

99,199 次观看 • 8 个月前

‼️Erika Kirk Just ADMITTED That People No Longer TRUST Turning Point USA 😱 At the Turning Point Educators Summit today, Erika Kirk spent several minutes talking about how people no longer trust each other because of COVID. She claimed that’s why many people now trust AI (specifically naming Grok) more than they trust actual humans. What she was really doing was damage control. Turning Point USA has been getting repeatedly fact-checked by Grok and community notes for spreading misleading information. They’ve also already been caught using AI-generated content themselves. So now Erika is trying to convince people that AI can’t be trusted, while positioning Turning Point as the more reliable source. But in doing so, she accidentally admitted something very telling: People don’t trust Turning Point USA anymore. Instead of addressing why trust in the organization has collapsed since Charlie’s death, she blamed COVID and tried to discredit AI tools that are exposing their inconsistencies. This was a clear attempt to get ahead of the growing skepticism around Turning Point’s leadership and messaging. If Turning Point was still trusted, she wouldn’t need to spend time trying to convince people not to believe what they see online. The fact that she felt the need to address it at all says a lot. RT this. More people need to see how they’re spinning this. My channel is under attack to silence my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

19,531 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨Druski's Disgusting Skit Mocking Charlie Kirk's Grieving Widow Erika is Peak Demonic Comedy – This Generation Has No Shame🚨 I'm disgusted by Druski's latest skit parodying Erika Kirk. Why has this generation become so demonic that it delights in attacking grieving widows? Erika Kirk has been turned into the punching bag of the internet—a woman who watched her husband, Charlie Kirk, get shot in the neck right in front of the world during a public event. The trauma of that moment is unimaginable, yet instead of basic human decency, we get endless mockery. First Candace Owens with her nonstop attacks and "investigative" series questioning everything from Erika's grief to her character. Now Druski, hiding behind "comedy" in drag makeup, a wig, and exaggerated conservative woman tropes, takes his shot in a skit that's blowing up online. He's not even subtle—it's clearly aimed at her style, mannerisms, and role at Turning Point USA. Call it satire all you want, but when did piling on a widow who lost the love of her life become peak entertainment? Grief isn't a performance for clout or laughs. Erika has spoken openly about the horror of that day, the chaos, and trying to hold it together for her family and organization. People process loss differently—some break down privately, others push forward publicly. Attacking her for it says more about the attackers than her. This isn't comedy; it's cruelty dressed up as entertainment from a generation that confuses edginess with humor. Druski might think he's edgy, but targeting a widow this way just makes him look like the joke. We should be better than this. Basic respect for someone enduring unimaginable pain shouldn't be optional, no matter your politics. RIP Charlie Kirk, and leave his widow alone.

Reverend Jordan Wells

63,479 次观看 • 4 个月前

‼️Erika Kirk Says She’s “BUILDING” While Refusing to ANSWER Any Questions👀 At today’s Turning Point Educators Summit, Erika Kirk gave a speech where she framed all criticism and questions about her leadership as “spiritual warfare” and “the enemy trying to distract.” She said she’s choosing to stay “heaven focused” and will continue “building” instead of addressing the noise. This is textbook avoidance. Instead of answering legitimate questions about her past, her ties to controversial figures, the internal revolt happening inside Turning Point chapters, or how she’s actually running the organization Charlie built, she’s choosing to spiritualize the criticism and paint herself as a victim of demonic attacks. The problem is simple: What exactly is she building? From the outside, it looks a lot more like she’s been destroying Charlie’s legacy — turning Turning Point into a vehicle for her own image, shutting down questions, and refusing to provide basic transparency. Meanwhile, chapter presidents have been resigning and speaking out, accusing the organization of straying far from what Charlie stood for. Using faith language to dodge accountability isn’t spiritual. It’s strategic. And it’s getting old. If Erika Kirk actually wanted to “build” something meaningful, she could start by answering the very real and very serious questions people have been asking for months — instead of pretending they’re just attacks from the enemy. RT this. More people need to see through this performance. My channel is under coordinated attack to stop my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. Donate here:

Project Constitution

23,073 次观看 • 1 个月前

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).

Brian Solis

113,698 次观看 • 3 年前