正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

eSafety Humiliated! Thanks to our proposal for algorithmic transparency, eSafety was exposed at yesterday's senate hearing by Senator Sarah Henderson. Shockingly, eSafety was more concerned about protecting the 'secret sauce' and 'trade secrets' of Meta, than protecting Australians. And she was forced, begrudgingly, to congratulate X for their open... show more

Free Speech Union of Australia

19,041 subscribers

199,980 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

IT’S NOTHING BUT A TROJAN HORSE A few hours ago, Labor introduced the ‘Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024’ into Parliament. And rather than the Bill set out how X (and the other platforms will police if Australians are 16 or over before they log on - in their typical dishonest and deceptive way of doing things - the Bill hands those powers to the eSafety Commissar to work out for herself, at a later date. The eSafety Commissar has demonstrated she is unfit to have such powers. You can bet this unelected bureaucrat will take it upon herself to make it as difficult and intrusive as possible for Australians to Log on to X. This legislation has nothing to do with "protecting the children" - it’s a smoke screen, a Trojan Horse to give eSafety Karen more power to force Australians to have government controlled biometric Digital ID and to make it more difficult for Australians to log on to X. THIS BILL MUST BE OPPOSED BY FREEDOM LOVING AUSTRALIANS - it gives too much power to the eSafety Commissar. The text of the Bill The Explanatory Memorandum

IT’S NOTHING BUT A TROJAN HORSE A few hours ago, Labor introduced the ‘Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024’ into Parliament. And rather than the Bill set out how X (and the other platforms will police if Australians are 16 or over before they log on - in their typical dishonest and deceptive way of doing things - the Bill hands those powers to the eSafety Commissar to work out for herself, at a later date. The eSafety Commissar has demonstrated she is unfit to have such powers. You can bet this unelected bureaucrat will take it upon herself to make it as difficult and intrusive as possible for Australians to Log on to X. This legislation has nothing to do with "protecting the children" - it’s a smoke screen, a Trojan Horse to give eSafety Karen more power to force Australians to have government controlled biometric Digital ID and to make it more difficult for Australians to log on to X. THIS BILL MUST BE OPPOSED BY FREEDOM LOVING AUSTRALIANS - it gives too much power to the eSafety Commissar. The text of the Bill The Explanatory Memorandum

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

76,953 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 eSafety Commissioner criticises X for pushing back against CENSORSHIP attempts eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has used her appearance at the Royal Commission into Antisemitism to go after Elon Musk’s X platform for not complying with their requests for censorship. She was particularly critical of X for not immediately hiding footage in Australia of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, the stabbing of a Christian priest, the slaying of a Ukrainian student on a train in the USA, and footage of the Bondi terrorist attack.

🚨 eSafety Commissioner criticises X for pushing back against CENSORSHIP attempts eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has used her appearance at the Royal Commission into Antisemitism to go after Elon Musk’s X platform for not complying with their requests for censorship. She was particularly critical of X for not immediately hiding footage in Australia of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, the stabbing of a Christian priest, the slaying of a Ukrainian student on a train in the USA, and footage of the Bondi terrorist attack.

Rukshan Fernando

40,604 次观看 • 3 个月前

TIME FOR THE eSAFETY COMMISSAR TO SAY "GOOD-BYE" and RESIGN A Federal Court judge has just denied the eSafety Commissioner’s application to extend an injunction on footage posted on X of the Wakeley stabbing last month. The eSafety Commissar has damaged Australia’s international reputation. Her conduct has been counterproductive - creating a "Streisand Effect" over the video. And now she has wasted taxpayers money, using her power to go after her former employer in the Federal Court and lost. She has no alternate other than to RESIGN immediately. Elon Musk

TIME FOR THE eSAFETY COMMISSAR TO SAY "GOOD-BYE" and RESIGN A Federal Court judge has just denied the eSafety Commissioner’s application to extend an injunction on footage posted on X of the Wakeley stabbing last month. The eSafety Commissar has damaged Australia’s international reputation. Her conduct has been counterproductive - creating a "Streisand Effect" over the video. And now she has wasted taxpayers money, using her power to go after her former employer in the Federal Court and lost. She has no alternate other than to RESIGN immediately. Elon Musk

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

124,418 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 Australia’s eSafety Commissioner attacks X for defending free speech in court, insisting the platform’s true goal is profiting from “horrific content” under the banner of free speech Julie Inman Grant, the former Twitter employee and WEF regular now working as Australia’s online safety regulator, shared multiple points of frustration with Elon Musk’s X platform for protecting free speech through legal challenges to censorship requests. When asked whether platforms like X hide behind free speech arguments to protect news-related content, she implied their only purpose must be to monetise it. Grant, who has not yet appeared before the US Congress for trying to diminish the freedom of Americans, went on to argue that sensible censorship can have a role in protecting democracy. The eSafety Commissioner was giving evidence at the Royal Commission on Antisemitism in Australia.

🚨 Australia’s eSafety Commissioner attacks X for defending free speech in court, insisting the platform’s true goal is profiting from “horrific content” under the banner of free speech Julie Inman Grant, the former Twitter employee and WEF regular now working as Australia’s online safety regulator, shared multiple points of frustration with Elon Musk’s X platform for protecting free speech through legal challenges to censorship requests. When asked whether platforms like X hide behind free speech arguments to protect news-related content, she implied their only purpose must be to monetise it. Grant, who has not yet appeared before the US Congress for trying to diminish the freedom of Americans, went on to argue that sensible censorship can have a role in protecting democracy. The eSafety Commissioner was giving evidence at the Royal Commission on Antisemitism in Australia.

Rukshan Fernando

22,864 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇦🇺X REFUSES AUSTRALIAN PUSH FOR GLOBAL CENSORSHIP Following the knife attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Sydney, the Australian eSafety Commissioner issued an order to social media platforms to take down content related to the attack. While X complied with the request in Australia, the eSafety Commissioner expanded their order to take down the content globally. X Global Government Affairs: “X has now received a demand from the eSafety Commissioner that X globally withhold these posts or face a daily fine of $785,000 AUD (about $500,000 USD). While X respects the right of a country to enforce its laws within its jurisdiction, the eSafety Commissioner does not have the authority to dictate what content X’s users can see globally. We will robustly challenge this unlawful and dangerous approach in court. Global takedown orders go against the very principles of a free and open internet and threaten free speech everywhere.” Australia’s PM Anthony Albanese found it extraordinary that X intends to challenge their global censorship demand. “By and large, people responded appropriately to the calls by the eSafety Commissioner, but X chose not to. I find it extraordinary that X chose not to comply and are trying to argue their case.” Sources: Reuters, Global Government Affairs

🇦🇺X REFUSES AUSTRALIAN PUSH FOR GLOBAL CENSORSHIP Following the knife attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Sydney, the Australian eSafety Commissioner issued an order to social media platforms to take down content related to the attack. While X complied with the request in Australia, the eSafety Commissioner expanded their order to take down the content globally. X Global Government Affairs: “X has now received a demand from the eSafety Commissioner that X globally withhold these posts or face a daily fine of $785,000 AUD (about $500,000 USD). While X respects the right of a country to enforce its laws within its jurisdiction, the eSafety Commissioner does not have the authority to dictate what content X’s users can see globally. We will robustly challenge this unlawful and dangerous approach in court. Global takedown orders go against the very principles of a free and open internet and threaten free speech everywhere.” Australia’s PM Anthony Albanese found it extraordinary that X intends to challenge their global censorship demand. “By and large, people responded appropriately to the calls by the eSafety Commissioner, but X chose not to. I find it extraordinary that X chose not to comply and are trying to argue their case.” Sources: Reuters, Global Government Affairs

Mario Nawfal

774,766 次观看 • 2 年前

IT’S TIME FOR eSAFETY KAREN TO BE SACKED She just couldn’t help herself. Just 3 days after President Trump survived an assassination attempt, eSafety Karen could not help herself and went on an unhinged anti-Trump rant full of misinformation, political bias and hypocrisy. She has demonstrated (again) that she is unfit to hold a position in the supposedly politically neutral Australia public service. eSafety Karen accused Trump and RFK Jr as spreading "COVID misinformation" when in fact it was Biden that was the worst offender, spreading dangerous Covid misinformation - falsely proclaiming that "if you‘ve been vaccinated you won’t get Covid" Why didn’t eSafety Karen call out Biden for this misinformation ? The simple answer is, that she’s an extremist from the far left and is politically bias. And the so-called "COVID misinformation superspreaders" like JFK Jr. that were censored, where in fact correct about everything. The passage of time has clearly shown that those that questioned the safety or efficacy of the "safe & effective" vaccines (that weren‘t even vaccines") were correct. Its crystal clear that masks mandates were useless, and that Ivermectin (in adequate doses and combined with zinc, doxycycline & Vitamin D) reduced hospitalisations and saved lives. And the censorship, cheered on by the likes of eSafety Karen, caused countless deaths, misery, hardship & illness Then without a clue of her own hypocrisy, eSafety Karen rants on about how misinformation led to real world violence. Yet she was silent on the violent hate directed at Trump. eSafety Karen is a clear & present danger to our freedoms. She envisions a totalitarian society run by leftist bureaucrats enforcing a woke agenda, where any any dissent is labelled "misinformation" and censored. Peter Dutton needs to show some leadership say she’ll be sacked on day one if he becomes Prime Minister.

IT’S TIME FOR eSAFETY KAREN TO BE SACKED She just couldn’t help herself. Just 3 days after President Trump survived an assassination attempt, eSafety Karen could not help herself and went on an unhinged anti-Trump rant full of misinformation, political bias and hypocrisy. She has demonstrated (again) that she is unfit to hold a position in the supposedly politically neutral Australia public service. eSafety Karen accused Trump and RFK Jr as spreading "COVID misinformation" when in fact it was Biden that was the worst offender, spreading dangerous Covid misinformation - falsely proclaiming that "if you‘ve been vaccinated you won’t get Covid" Why didn’t eSafety Karen call out Biden for this misinformation ? The simple answer is, that she’s an extremist from the far left and is politically bias. And the so-called "COVID misinformation superspreaders" like JFK Jr. that were censored, where in fact correct about everything. The passage of time has clearly shown that those that questioned the safety or efficacy of the "safe & effective" vaccines (that weren‘t even vaccines") were correct. Its crystal clear that masks mandates were useless, and that Ivermectin (in adequate doses and combined with zinc, doxycycline & Vitamin D) reduced hospitalisations and saved lives. And the censorship, cheered on by the likes of eSafety Karen, caused countless deaths, misery, hardship & illness Then without a clue of her own hypocrisy, eSafety Karen rants on about how misinformation led to real world violence. Yet she was silent on the violent hate directed at Trump. eSafety Karen is a clear & present danger to our freedoms. She envisions a totalitarian society run by leftist bureaucrats enforcing a woke agenda, where any any dissent is labelled "misinformation" and censored. Peter Dutton needs to show some leadership say she’ll be sacked on day one if he becomes Prime Minister.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

195,930 次观看 • 2 年前

The Office of the eSafety Commissioner does commendable work in protecting children and adults from bullying and, most importantly, removing child abuse material. I praised the Office for this work. However, in my opinion, the eSafety Commissioner has brought the office into disrepute with her personal vendetta against Twitter/X and her attempt to become the world internet police. Last year, the Commissioner finalised investigations into 9,500 pieces of violent and extremist content. I asked what these were. The answer provided was that the Commissioner was taking down material from anywhere in the world, detecting it in part because they actively searched for it, even without a complaint. Given that the Commissioner is positioning herself as the world internet police at our expense, I asked what benefit removing the 9,500 pieces of material had for Australians. The answer relied on one incident, and there was no proof it actually caused a terrorist incident. I asked why there was no explanation of what the other material was, such as a transparency register so we can see what material they are requiring to be taken down to check for political bias. The question was ignored. I also asked what direct benefit her actions had in addressing terrorism and violent material. The Commissioner answered regarding child material, which I had already praised. The Commissioner is avoiding scrutiny of her takedown notices for violent and extremist material, and I believe it is because they follow a political bias. One Nation calls for the eSafety Commissioner to stand down.

The Office of the eSafety Commissioner does commendable work in protecting children and adults from bullying and, most importantly, removing child abuse material. I praised the Office for this work. However, in my opinion, the eSafety Commissioner has brought the office into disrepute with her personal vendetta against Twitter/X and her attempt to become the world internet police. Last year, the Commissioner finalised investigations into 9,500 pieces of violent and extremist content. I asked what these were. The answer provided was that the Commissioner was taking down material from anywhere in the world, detecting it in part because they actively searched for it, even without a complaint. Given that the Commissioner is positioning herself as the world internet police at our expense, I asked what benefit removing the 9,500 pieces of material had for Australians. The answer relied on one incident, and there was no proof it actually caused a terrorist incident. I asked why there was no explanation of what the other material was, such as a transparency register so we can see what material they are requiring to be taken down to check for political bias. The question was ignored. I also asked what direct benefit her actions had in addressing terrorism and violent material. The Commissioner answered regarding child material, which I had already praised. The Commissioner is avoiding scrutiny of her takedown notices for violent and extremist material, and I believe it is because they follow a political bias. One Nation calls for the eSafety Commissioner to stand down.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

17,892 次观看 • 1 年前

Anne Hathaway says she had to have an ‘intimacy coordinator’ for her latest role in ‘Mother Mary.’ “Vee was in charge of protecting us and protecting our nervous system.” The actress says the expert was brought on set for “energy, for breath and fear.”

Anne Hathaway says she had to have an ‘intimacy coordinator’ for her latest role in ‘Mother Mary.’ “Vee was in charge of protecting us and protecting our nervous system.” The actress says the expert was brought on set for “energy, for breath and fear.”

Oli London

39,719 次观看 • 5 个月前

Watch until the end, as I’ve fixed eSafety Karen’s ad. The Albanese regime’s new ad "For the Good of" is not about providing information - it’s a $14 million propaganda campaign. It’s the type of propaganda you’d expect from a dishonest government trying to manipulate public opinion. And eSafety Karen is still hiding the details of how she is going to dictate to Australians what we must to do to prevent our social media accounts being shut down. We know exactly what tricks she is up to, she’s delaying providing the details until just before Christmas hoping Australians will just roll over and accept her dictates.

Watch until the end, as I’ve fixed eSafety Karen’s ad. The Albanese regime’s new ad "For the Good of" is not about providing information - it’s a $14 million propaganda campaign. It’s the type of propaganda you’d expect from a dishonest government trying to manipulate public opinion. And eSafety Karen is still hiding the details of how she is going to dictate to Australians what we must to do to prevent our social media accounts being shut down. We know exactly what tricks she is up to, she’s delaying providing the details until just before Christmas hoping Australians will just roll over and accept her dictates.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

23,992 次观看 • 11 个月前

Last week X was ordered to remove social media posts from accounts across the world by the Office of the eSafety Commissioner. It appears that Australian taxpayers are paying for an Australian bureaucracy to make orders seeking the removal of posts by American and European social media accounts involving a Ukrainian refugee in America. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:

Last week X was ordered to remove social media posts from accounts across the world by the Office of the eSafety Commissioner. It appears that Australian taxpayers are paying for an Australian bureaucracy to make orders seeking the removal of posts by American and European social media accounts involving a Ukrainian refugee in America. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:

Senator Alex Antic

63,413 次观看 • 11 个月前

This predator targeting kids was exposed by Tommy from Colorado Ped Patrol. CPP decoys caught his every move and shut him down, while OSINT made sure Tommy was able to expose him. Another win for protecting our children. Stay vigilant. 💪🏻🔥🤘🏻 #cpp #coloradopedpatrol #colorado

This predator targeting kids was exposed by Tommy from Colorado Ped Patrol. CPP decoys caught his every move and shut him down, while OSINT made sure Tommy was able to expose him. Another win for protecting our children. Stay vigilant. 💪🏻🔥🤘🏻 #cpp #coloradopedpatrol #colorado

CPP Clips

29,622 次观看 • 2 个月前

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE Finally the Liberals are objecting to the out of control eSafety Karen, with the comments of Liberal Senator Maria Kovacic. But it’s too late. The Liberals had the chance during the last Parliament to block or at least amend the Age Verification Bill - but they voted with Labor. I was screaming from the sidelines that the legislation dangerously sub-contracted the powers of the Parliament out to eSafety Karen, enabling her to usurp the Parliament and unilaterally decide how the "Age Verification" would be applied - and called for the Libersls to vote against it. But, the Liberals held hands with Labor and voted for this (with the notable exception of Alex Antic) - and now they don’t have the numbers in Senate to do anything.

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE Finally the Liberals are objecting to the out of control eSafety Karen, with the comments of Liberal Senator Maria Kovacic. But it’s too late. The Liberals had the chance during the last Parliament to block or at least amend the Age Verification Bill - but they voted with Labor. I was screaming from the sidelines that the legislation dangerously sub-contracted the powers of the Parliament out to eSafety Karen, enabling her to usurp the Parliament and unilaterally decide how the "Age Verification" would be applied - and called for the Libersls to vote against it. But, the Liberals held hands with Labor and voted for this (with the notable exception of Alex Antic) - and now they don’t have the numbers in Senate to do anything.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

20,494 次观看 • 1 年前

It’s no secret that during the COVID-19 pandemic, Donald Trump was only interested in protecting himself. Governors begged for help from the White House, and their response was to try and cut a deal to earn Trump praise. He took advantage of our communities and failed us.

It’s no secret that during the COVID-19 pandemic, Donald Trump was only interested in protecting himself. Governors begged for help from the White House, and their response was to try and cut a deal to earn Trump praise. He took advantage of our communities and failed us.

JB Pritzker

63,430 次观看 • 1 年前