Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

ESPN's Gary Striewski spoke with PRCA ProRodeo's 'The Chute Bosses' podcast ahead of #SC50in50's stop Cheyenne Frontier Days in Wyoming (Thurs, 10:30p ET, ESPN) The Colorado native discussed his Wyoming connection, introduction to mutton bustin' & more Watch:

11,157 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Roughly one in 10 Americans gets their water from the Colorado River. But the river is drying up due to a persistent drought driven in part by climate change. The crisis has been building for decades, but will likely come to a head this summer, as the past winter was brutally warm. The heavy snow that was supposed to fall on the Mountain West and slowly melt, sending water down into rivers and reservoirs, never happened. "Simply put, the basin is not producing the water supply that all of our states anticipated decades ago," California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot told Horizons host William Brangham. "So we all anticipated and planned for and built infrastructure to use more water than is currently available." The Colorado River has slipped to record low levels, threatening the water supply for 40 million people across seven western states — Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, Arizona, California and Nevada. But the crisis is not just about water; it's also about electricity. Lake Powell and Lake Mead, two reservoirs on the river, are also nearing record lows. The man-made lakes generate hydroelectric power for millions. In February, the seven Colorado River basin states failed to reach a new agreement on how to share the river's dwindling resources. The federal government is threatening to impose its own plan. Joel Ferry, the commissioner of Utah's Department of Natural Resources, called it a "solvable problem," and said the seven state governors are working with the federal government to find solutions. "Ultimately, this is something that both our political leaders and the water users have got to come together to find a creative solution," he said. Horizons from PBS News, dives into the science, health, technology and environmental issues making headlines each week. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

PBS News

15,573 views • 1 month ago

The rules of professional product development are being rewritten in real time. - PMs and designers can ship software as easily as engineers. - Software is no longer just built for humans—it’s also built for agents as first-class citizens. To better understand how we build products in this world, I invited Mike Krieger (Mike Krieger) on Every 📧’s AI & I podcast. Mike cofounded Instagram and is now a member of the technical staff at Anthropic, co-leading Anthropic Labs, their internal incubator for experimental products. He's been at the frontier of two transformative technology waves: mobile/social and now agent-native software. We discussed: - How to build a truly agent-native product. The best products today, like Claude Code, allow users to do things that their creators never intended. But that requires hard trade-offs between freedom and safety/reliability for frontier products, an issue that Mike's team is learning how to solve. - What's different about building now versus building Instagram. At Instagram, it took months to hit dead ends and learn what to cut. Now, that cycle runs in hours. - The trap of building too much, too fast with agents. You can go from idea to a nearly-shipped product in a day, but that process doesn’t give you the incremental feedback that used to tell you what not to build. The models are great at adding features, but can create a product that lacks coherence. - How Anthropic Labs structures product teams. New product experiments are led by only two people, usually a product manager or designer paired with an engineer. Mike says bigger teams tend to be too slow because of coordination costs. - Why you need to throw out your product and start over every three to six months. AI progress means most of your harness will be outdated quickly—the best teams build this into their product strategy. And much more! You should watch this one. Timestamps Introduction: What's gotten easier—and what hasn't—about building products in the age of AI: Why vibe coding creates "indoor trees": How rewrites have become a normal part of the development process: What "agent native" product design means: How Mike's labs team is structured and the cofounder model: The best signal for a product bet is someone with "break through walls" conviction: Navigating enterprise customers while keeping pace with rapid AI change: OpenClaw, personal agents, and the product question defining 2026:

Dan Shipper 📧

58,714 views • 3 months ago

🚀 NEW EPISODE 🚀 Scaling the Agentic Internet Friederike Ernst 🦉 chats with Bowen Wang, Head of Protocol @ Near One, about blockchain scaling, AI, and how NEAR Protocol sets the ground for AI-native apps & the agentic economy. ‘Attention Is All You Need’, co-wrote by Illia Polosukhin in 2017, laid the foundation for arguably one of the most consequential tech breakthroughs in our recent history. 1 year later, Illia founded Near AI, which later became NEAR Protocol. They were visionaries ahead of their time and, although AI took several more years before becoming a viable product, the experience of scaling databases would later prove valuable and applicable in blockchain world. As a result, NEAR Protocol is one of the first blockchains to implement execution layer sharding, asynchronous execution and stateless validation, bringing the finality time down to 1.2 seconds, with a block time of 0.6 seconds. Don't forget to RT & follow Epicenter Podcast! Topics discussed in this episode: 0:00 - Introduction 3:30 - Bowen’s background 4:47 - Near’s pivot from AI to blockchains 8:26 - The role of Near One 9:13 - Near’s tech stack upgrades 13:39 - Optimizing network architecture 17:08 - Stateless validation & block propagation 21:10 - Sharding & asynchronous execution 29:12 - Message passing between shards & shard ‘equality’ 35:51 - Challenges of implementing stateless validation 41:05 - Applications benefiting from Near’s finality speed 44:18 - Intent-based infrastructure 47:10 - AI use cases on Near 52:27 - Expanding Near’s ecosystem 54:43 - Development challenges 57:55 - Near’s vision and goals

Epicenter Podcast

66,601 views • 1 year ago

I sat down with Howie Liu, the CEO of Airtable ($500M+ revenue, 1 billion in the bank) and asked him: is there really 1 trillion up for grabs in AI agents? His answer: it's way more than that. It's the entire GDP of white collar labor. Tens of trillions. Here's what stood out: 1. Howie runs 30 Claude Code instances in parallel on HyperAgent. Each one is coupled to a browser, fully autonomous. They review each other's PRs. That's how the CEO of a $10 billion company develops software right now. 2. He wrote his most recent board memo with AI agents. His best investors told him it was the best memo he'd ever written. It cost him $150 in tokens and 10x less time. 3. His take on why people aren't building: they're still using agents like chatbots. They ask "who's going to win the next election" instead of giving it a real multi-hour task. Using is believing. You have to spend a full weekend going deep. 4. AI agents are at less than 10% penetration in most industries. Software engineering is at 50% but even that's an overestimate because most devs are still in "tab autocomplete" mode. The frontier has moved way past that. 5. He revealed HyperAgent. Think of it as the visual agent builder that gives you a low floor and a high ceiling. You can prototype fast and also scale to running serious operations with a fleet of agents. 6. Howie's philosophy/POV: HyperAgent is to agents what the iPhone was to computing. The power was already there. The accessibility is what changes everything. Good news Howie is giving $1,000 in free HyperAgent credits to the first 1,000 people who sign up. $1 million committed to listeners The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. You get Opus, frontier models, real agent workflows. You just gotta click the link in the description of the YT vid (share this with a friend to give them the $1000 too before it runs out!) episode is live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 and thanks to Howie for supporting the community/channel. Howie Liu is rooting for you to build a $100 million company with less than 5 employees. So am I. watch

GREG ISENBERG

39,210,670 views • 2 months ago

In episode 25 of Launch Pad, I talk to Charles Allen, Charles Allen (charlesallen.eth) 🐢🦄, CEO of BTCS - an Ether treasury company. Charles talks about: - working in the early days of Bitcoin - pivoting to Ethereum - staking with Rocket Pool - what sets BTCS apart from DATs and much more! Check Linktree in the bio for links to watch/listen elsewhere. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Charles Allen and BTCS 03:02 Charles Allen's Engineering Background and Early Career 05:26 Transition to Crypto and BTCS's Origins 11:10 Challenges and Strategies in Early BTCS 13:02 Pivoting to Bitcoin Mining 18:58 Developing a Digital Asset Strategy 21:07 Exploring Ethereum and Its Potential 25:08 Public Perception of Bitcoin and Crypto 29:48 The Boom of 2017 and M&A Deals 33:03 Navigating the Staking Landscape 36:50 Communicating Risks to Investors 38:06 Exploring Revenue Strategies 41:11 Regulatory Challenges in Staking 43:41 The SEC's Impact on Operations 50:07 Innovations with Rocket Pool 59:01 The Evolution of Digital Asset Treasury Strategies 01:04:32 Navigating Market Dynamics and Shareholder Interests 01:07:07 Investor Focus: Beyond Stock Prices 01:08:58 Leveraging DeFi: The Aave Strategy Explained 01:14:39 SEC Ruling Impact: Opportunities for Liquid Staking Tokens 01:18:53 The Future of Rocket Pool and Ethereum 01:22:56 The Evolution of Blockchain and Institutional Adoption 01:27:00 Ethereum's Role in the Future of Finance 01:32:37 Looking Ahead: BTCS's Strategic Vision 01:34:11 Personal Reflections: The Journey and Future Aspirations

waqwaqattack.eth

31,319 views • 11 months ago

#JonBenetRamsey case update ⬇️ Netflix has released “Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey,” a three-part docuseries exploring the haunting 28-year-old mystery. This week I spoke one on one with her father John Ramsey while guest hosting Banfield - we discussed the frustrating journey to justice and why the Colorado Police Department has not invited independent investigative genetic genealogy labs to help solve the case … yet. I asked John Ramsey about his recent conversations with a new investigator about why they haven’t taken up ’s offer to help. He said “Well, we did. And basically what he said, Okay, look, there's some things happening that I can't tell you about, and don't think DNA technology is there yet. I totally disagree with that. I met the founders of Othram Labs, which is one of the cutting edge labs out there that'd be happy to help. I sent a letter to the chief based on my meeting with what I learned with Othram they said A) they don't destroy any DNA when they do testing on it anymore, which was one of the concerns. B) they have the ability to separate DNA, mixed DNA samples, which is one of the issues with the sample they got in 1997 they had an unidentified male DNA sample in early 1997 it was mixed, apparently, with the blood DNA that can, now technology wise, be separated. That's huge. And the third thing, they have the ability to do familial genealogy research, which has been wildly successful in solving Old, old cold cases. That's what we're asking the police to do. Go to one of these cutting edge labs, let them do new testing, and they need a new DNA sample. We have a DNA sample which was obtained in January 1997 of an unidentified male DNA. It's not in the format needed to do this familial genealogy research to be a new command, and that's why we need to do more testing. Our full conversation here ⬇️ NewsNation Banfield on NewsNation #JonBenet #JonBenetRamsey #JohnRamsey Netflix

Laura Ingle

11,486 views • 1 year ago

Full PODCAST on #X Tucker Carlson just released "Something Big Is About to Happen" and discussed the border as a migration and invasion. Dr. Bret Weinstine is Tucker's quest, and he covers his visit to the Darien Gap and discussions with Michael Yon. Michael was able to show him all of the camps and the paths that the migrants take from all over the world. What Tucker and Bret missed was the connection to the US Grid. The Chinese camp can only be described as a military processing camp. The Secretary of Homeland Security visited the Center, and the number of Chinese military-aged men traveling through the camp went up to 10,900 from 900 in the previous 100 days. Why is this important? I have been talking about grid security for years, and the ability for the Chinese-purchased main grid interconnects has been documented, and now confirmed by the US. Officials. The story "US Officials Deliver Warning that Chinese Hackers are Targeting Infrastructure – Warning About The Real Question – Is Mayorkas in on it? was posted on January 31st. It covers more of the FBI warnings and descriptions of the topics covered by Tucker, Michael Yon, and Dr. Bret Weinstine. The grid can be brought down remotely, and with 10s of thousands of military-aged men in the country - you should be aware. Please follow Michael Yon on his Substack, Twitter, and LinkedIn. He is a national treasure that has been battle-tested and should be listened to. I appreciate his efforts in sharing his travels and his leadership. George McMillian and I have talked about Michael and George's travels through the Panama and Darien Gap areas. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY Twitter Tucker Carlson Tucker's Interview Highlights of the Podcast 01:34 - Chinese grid equipment coming 05:32 - The Panama Canal Railway 11:38 - The IOM helps the invaders get through from Colombia 29:29 - The Chinese Communist Party 33:16 - The Canadian border and increasing numbers 38:09 - The vaccine before the Palestinians 52:36 - The war in Ukraine and got into some combat stuff 1:19:57 - The factories and people are still smoking dope in America 1:24:22 - The biggest gas field in Europe 1:30:20 - The Second Amendment folks to try to bring in the U.N. 1:41:07 - The Chinese Communist Party and the World Economic Forum 1:47:56 - The structure of lies and truth General Mike Flynn Michael Yon, George McMillan and team have great information.

STUART TURLEY - Energy Podcast Host

59,791 views • 2 years ago

Peter Costello was Treasurer of Australia from 1996 to 2007 - longer than anyone else in the country's history. He architected and led the most complex tax reform in the postwar era (maybe even in the whole of Australian history): the introduction of a value-added consumption tax, the GST, in 2000. I wanted to chat with Peter for three specific reasons. First, to gain a more concrete and visceral appreciation of exactly what a reform of this scale takes. On this, it was interesting to hear his war stories: for example, the Australian government believed there were about 1 million businesses in Australia. But when it began issuing ABNs (Australian Business Numbers) to businesses that registered for the GST, more than 2 million businesses came out of the woodwork! That is, despite Australia's unusually high state capacity, the government thought there were fewer than half as many businesses in the country as actually existed. Another example: the GST prompted the very first use of PowerPoint in the Australian Cabinet. Peter recalls giving an 8-hour (!) PPT presentation about the GST to his cabinet colleagues in 1998. He thinks that he wouldn't have been able to get their agreement without the specific technology of PowerPoint, because it enabled him to easily show the distributional effects of the new tax and accompanying compensation. Second, I wanted hear Peter's theories as to why it's seemingly become so much harder for the Australian government to achieve reforms of the scale of the GST. After 2000, the reform process has looked more and more like wading in molasses. Peter buys the story that we've become victims of our own prosperity - Australia's success has reduced the evolutionary pressure to continue enhancing productivity (a sort of 'good times create soft people' story). I think this is plausible, but not the whole story (see my second chat with Ken Henry for other theories). A specific lesson Peter shares for would-be reformers: you have to go for broke in your first term in government. "[M]y experience in government was that, as you go on in government, you get worn down... you get more tired, your opponents get a fix on you. You’ve expended enormous political capital...". Third, and unrelated to the GST, I wanted to chat with Peter about the baby bonus that he introduced in 2004. This was a lump sum payment of $3,000 (soon increased to $4,000, then $5,000, before it was means-tested, and then, in 2014 abolished and replaced with paid parental leave) to families with newborn children. Strikingly, the baby bonus led to an increase (albeit temporarily) in Australia's total fertility rate: it rose in the mid-2000s, peaking locally at ~1.98 in 2008. Australia is one of the only western countries to have reversed its declining TFR since the demographic transition began. Surprisingly, I learned from Peter that the government did not initially conceive of the baby bonus as a tool for increasing the TFR. Rather, it was simply a consolidation and rationalisation of a bunch of disparate benefits for families with new children. So the uptick in births was a (happy) accident. In picking apart the causes of the uptick, Peter thinks the narrative effect (as he famously said, "have one for mum, one for dad, and one for the country") was much more important than the financial effect. Interestingly, his view is consistent with one of the main explanations for declining fertility coming out of the field of cultural evolution (see, for e.g., my 2024 conversation with Rob Boyd and Pete Richerson). Anyhow, it was a very fun conversation. You can watch it on any of the podcast apps or on YT (link below). Enjoy! Timestamps: (0:00:00) - Introduction. (0:01:21) - Inside Australia's most complex tax system overhaul (the GST). (0:47:05) - Why Costello hid revenue estimates from the PM. (0:49:57) - Lessons for getting big things done in government. (1:10:32) - The 2004 baby bonus, & how Australia achieved the impossible (increasing its total fertility rate).

Joseph Noel Walker

29,558 views • 8 months ago

As the news of Jim Curtin's departure continues to reverberate across the soccer world, Herculez Gomez (herculez gomez) and Sebastian Salazar (Sebastian Salazar) discussed it on Futbol Americas. Hercules: "I think it’s embarrassing. We sit here and question the Philadelphia Union’s lack of ambition and effort to win because they don’t spend. The front office, Ernst Tanner and that ownership, they don’t do a damn thing to help this team win the way other teams in Major League Soccer do—by spending money... When he finally spoke out about the lack of funds, about needing some support—saying, “Help us, help me, help you”— when he is final vocal, this is how you want to show that you are are ambitious? You want to show ambition by firing the one good thing you have there? I don’t understand it. I don't get it I think it’s embarrassing on all fronts from a team like the Philadelphia Union." Salazar: "Honestly, Herc, I think this is a good thing for Jim Curtin. Now he can go somewhere where they’ll give him money. He’s a great coach, and with resources, he’ll find success in MLS—big-time success. The only thing holding him back was Philadelphia Union ownership, not his work on the sidelines. I think Curtin finally got tired of not getting the support he needed and said, 'Enough is enough, either back me or not.' And the Union responded by deciding they want someone who’ll stay quiet and manufacture mediocre results. I think that’s all the ownership is content with right now." Also, Jim joining his good friend Jesse Marsch in Canada ahead of the 2026 World Cup? Intriguing thought, Herc. Especially considering, as I understand it, Jason Hernandez at TFC showed interest in Curtin at one point. You can watch Futbol Americas on ESPN and their web platforms. #doop #MLS #VAMOS #futbolamericas #ESPN 📹: ESPN+

José Roberto Nuñez

30,243 views • 1 year ago

Kevin Kelly (Kevin Kelly) has spent more time thinking about the future than almost anyone else. From VR in the 1980s to the blockchain in the 2000s—and now generative AI—Kevin has spent a lifetime journeying to the frontiers of technology, only to return with rich stories about what’s next. Today, as WIRED’s senior maverick, his project for 2025 is to outline what the next century looks like in a world shaped by new technologies like AI and genetic engineering. He’s a personal hero of mine—not to mention a fellow Annie Dillard fan—and it was a privilege to have him on AI & I. We get into: - How you can predict the future. According to Kevin, the draw of new frontiers—from the first edition of Burning Man and remote corners of Asia, to the early days of the internet and AI—isn’t staying at the edge forever; it's returning with a story to tell. - Why history is so important to help you understand the future. To stay grounded while exploring what’s new, Kevin balances the thrill of the future with the wisdom of the past. He pairs AI research with reading about history, and playing with an AI tool by retreating to his workshop to make something with his hands. - From 1,000 true fans to an audience of one. Rather than creating for an audience, Kevin has been using LLMs to explore his own imagination. After realizing that da Vinci, Martin Luther, and Columbus were alive at the same time, he asked ChatGPT to imagine them snowed in at a hotel together, and the prompt spiraled into an epic saga, co-written with AI. But he has no plans to publish it because the joy was in creating something just for himself. - What the history of electricity can teach us about AI. Kevin draws a parallel between AI and the early days of electricity. We could produce electric sparks long before we understood the forces that created them, and now we’re building intelligent machines without really understanding what intelligence is. - Why Kevin sees intelligence as a mosaic—not a monolith. Kevin believes intelligence isn’t a single force, but a compound of many cognitive elements. He draws from Marvin Minsky’s “society of mind”—the theory that the mind is made up of smaller agents working together—and sees echoes of this in the Mixture of Experts architecture used in some models today. - Your competitive advantage is being yourself. Don’t aim to be the best—aim to be the only. Kevin realized that the stories no one else at Wired wanted to write were often the ones he was suited for, and trusting that instinct led to some of his best work. This is a must-watch for anyone who wants to make sense of AI through the lens of history, learn how to spot the future before it arrives, or grew up reading Wired. Watch below! Timestamps: 1. 00:00:50 - Introduction 2. 00:01:10 - Why Dan and Kelly love Annie Dillard 3. 00:12:52 - Learn how to predict the future like Kelly 4. 00:16:10 - What the history of electricity can teach us about AI 5. 00:20:13 - How Kelly thinks about the nature of intelligence 6. 00:25:44 - Kelly's advice on discovering your competitive advantage 7. 00:29:33 - The story of how Kelly assembled a bench of star writers for Wired 8. 00:34:43 - How Kelly used ChatGPT to co-create a book 9. 00:39:12 - Using AI as a mirror for your mind 10. 00:43:43 - What Kelly learned from betting on VR in the 1980s

Dan Shipper 📧

67,864 views • 1 year ago

In this wide-ranging and richly entertaining conversation, novelist and political satirist Christopher Buckley joins Peter Robinson for a reflection on writing, legacy, friendship, and grace. From their early days as speechwriters for George H. W. Bush to Buckley's prolific career as an author of more than 20 books—including Thank You for Smoking and Steaming to Bamboola—the two longtime friends revisit the formative moments, literary inspirations, and unforgettable characters that shaped Buckley's life and work. Buckley offers sharp, often hilarious insight into the craft of satire, the absurdities of Washington politics, and the cultural shifts in American media and manners. The conversation also turns poignantly to Buckley's late parents, Patricia and William F. Buckley Jr., his transition from political fiction to historical novels, and the enduring influence of figures like Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. Woven throughout is a deep appreciation for civility, wit, and the lost art of gentlemanly discourse—an ethos embodied by the towering figures of a previous generation, now honored in memory. With warmth and self-deprecating humor, Buckley closes the interview by discussing his father's typewriter (which Christopher has donated to the Hoover Institution Library & Archives), on which William Buckley composed the National Review (National Review)'s formative mission statement: to "stand athwart history and yell stop," and by reading from the epilogue of Steaming to Bamboola, offering a quietly moving meditation on departure and legacy. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge here:

Hoover Institution

25,332 views • 1 year ago

“For a long time, I was a guest in our house” Thierry Henry speaks from his soul. He has depth. He’s a man in touch with himself. I recall some years ago, he spoke about how much he wanted to please his father on Steven Bartlett Diary of a CEO podcast. Everything he aimed to achieve was to please the voice that rang in his head, telling him to do it better. His father stood behind him while he built a career, probably saw the good many never saw. As a father, he also mentioned how COVID-19 changed his life. It was the point he chose his family. That was probably why he said at some point, he became a guest in his house. Men become guests in their house. There was a Reminisce Alaga interview I saw. I think it was on ISaidWhatISaidPod. He said there was a point he went into his daughter(s) room and asked when they painted the wall pink. His wife told him it’s been there for two years. He said that was the point he thought it important to rest on the tours and be with his children. At that point, he probably was a guest in his house. Men’s lives are not easy. Footballers especially — elite footballers most especially are like tour musicians. They’re often on the road. You’re playing away games round the country, spending three days or more away from home when you have continental away games. Gabriel Jesus spoke about the same thing in his recent interview with The Players’ Tribune titled “A Letter to My Family and my Arsenal Family”. He said football made him distant but his ACL injury brought him closer. “I wasn’t the husband and father that I needed to be,” he said. When his wife gave birth to his daughter, he said he only held her for one day. Brazil called and he had to go. And he was a guy who grew up without a father. For his child at the time, he was there now but wasn’t there too. “I always promised myself: When I become a father, I will always be there for my kids. “When Helena was born, I was not living up to that. I was there, but I was always distracted, you know? Always catching a flight.” That’s the tough decisions men have to make sometimes. At the point of growth and ascent, life will ask questions, and difficult decisions will need to be made. Hopefully, it will be one that won’t damage the future. The future one is securing.

Rilwan

206,601 views • 6 months ago