Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

#JonBenetRamsey case update ⬇️ Netflix has released “Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey,” a three-part docuseries exploring the haunting 28-year-old mystery. This week I spoke one on one with her father John Ramsey while guest hosting Banfield - we discussed the frustrating journey to justice and why the Colorado... Police Department has not invited independent investigative genetic genealogy labs to help solve the case … yet. I asked John Ramsey about his recent conversations with a new investigator about why they haven’t taken up ’s offer to help. He said “Well, we did. And basically what he said, Okay, look, there's some things happening that I can't tell you about, and don't think DNA technology is there yet. I totally disagree with that. I met the founders of Othram Labs, which is one of the cutting edge labs out there that'd be happy to help. I sent a letter to the chief based on my meeting with what I learned with Othram they said A) they don't destroy any DNA when they do testing on it anymore, which was one of the concerns. B) they have the ability to separate DNA, mixed DNA samples, which is one of the issues with the sample they got in 1997 they had an unidentified male DNA sample in early 1997 it was mixed, apparently, with the blood DNA that can, now technology wise, be separated. That's huge. And the third thing, they have the ability to do familial genealogy research, which has been wildly successful in solving Old, old cold cases. That's what we're asking the police to do. Go to one of these cutting edge labs, let them do new testing, and they need a new DNA sample. We have a DNA sample which was obtained in January 1997 of an unidentified male DNA. It's not in the format needed to do this familial genealogy research to be a new command, and that's why we need to do more testing. Our full conversation here ⬇️ NewsNation Banfield on NewsNation #JonBenet #JonBenetRamsey #JohnRamsey Netflixshow more

Laura Ingle

70,241 subscribers

11,486 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics #JonBenetRamsey

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

7 Comments

Paul Holes1 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech 🤷😎

Duchess_of_Yinz1 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech @PaulHoles The DNA needs put against the geneaology sites. Theres 0 excuse for why it hasn’t been done yet.

LADYBECK1 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech @PaulHoles I followed this story from the original TV coverage and have watched every documentary that comes out. I have NEVER believed either one of her parents or any family member did anything but love JonBenet. I do not believe they ever abused her, nor that they killed her.

Melissa Arauz1 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech @PaulHoles @ChrisArauz23 Read this.

Nutzoda11 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech @PaulHoles I’m telling you all who was involved in destroying this poor family hope yall die a horrible death or you have! Yall a disgrace

Rob1 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech @PaulHoles Laura did you ask John about why there wasn’t any footprints in the snow since they are saying that an intruder was in the house?

Rob1 year ago

@NewsNation @149Zone7 @NancyGrace @greta @GeraldoRivera @connellmcshane @JoeGiacalone @CrimeCon @OthramTech @PaulHoles Well the only good that came out of this documentary it’s that John slips and tells everyone that he tells the officer(Officer French) that his daughter could have not ran away cause it’s cold, dark, and snowing!!!! OPPS!!!

Related Videos

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith explains how the Covid PCR "tests" were likely used to collect people's DNA and send said DNA to gene banks. This DNA, Smith hypothesizes, can now be used by Larry Ellison's Stargate program to create genome-tailored "vaccines." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with Charlie Robinson (Macroaggressions Podcast with Charlie Robinson) posted to the Macroaggressions Rumble channel on December 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Genetics is, you know, all basically eugenics. And so fast forward to 2020 when I started realizing, oh, there's these false positives with the test. And I knew that you didn't even need to have a test to be diagnosed with it. The doctors had to look at you and say, oh, I think you have Covid. So that's so smart that you were thinking, oh, it's gotta be a genetic screen. "Because at some point down the line, I've actually found documentation from the CDC that ordered every CLIA certified lab to send genetics, sequences to one of two different gene banks. G I S A I— G I S A I D. So GI SAID, or NCBI, one of those two gene banks. And it did say in the fine print, like, oh, these sequences for Covid. "But I asked David Rasnick, who I did an interview with, and he actually knew Kary Mullis and worked with Kary Mullis at one point, who invented PCR. And I asked him this specifically. I said, so obviously the PCR can run an entire DNA sequence. And here's this instruction. I showed him the document. I said, okay, they're sending these sequences and people are trolling me. You know, the Internet masses are commenting back saying, oh, no, that was just the sequence for Covid, for the variant of COVID because they had like six of them listed out. "And I asked him, do you think they're actually, like, after they run the PCR test and they get this sequence and then they have to send it to the gene bank, do you think they're actually spending the time to edit it and cut out just that section? Or do you think they're just sending the whole thing and then the gene bank can decide which section they want to take as their sequence? And he goes, they don't have the time to go in and edit all of that. I mean, they could, but most likely, no. Most likely they're just sending the whole thing. "Then the gene bank that, that they send it to, and he's shown evidence of how much DNA has been sent to these gene banks. They're tracking all of it carefully. So, yeah, that's absolutely what they're doing. Well, NCBI and GISAID, I haven't looked into who owns them, but there's another one that was creating PCR tests. And I believe that all of the PCR tests were doing the same thing, sending, genetic information back to some, some hive mind, whether that's NCBI or, you know, some other gene bank. "So it's generally the testing places that are, you know, having it send back. So there is the Human Genome Project in China, which is now, I forget the name, it's, it changed its name, but it's the biggest biotech company in China now. And they made PCR test kits, PCR and the IgG, which is the antibody test, and they send it to America. And who do you think is getting those results back? "So our DNA is going to some Chinese database. And even our own American military has flagged that gene bank as being a problem because they have all our individual information. And when you go to that gene bank and the other ones are really similar when you look at like why they exist and what they think they're doing with our DNA. Because I was really interested in why are they collecting all of this? They're obviously going to use it against us in some way. "So what is that? How do we get ahead of that or how do we stop it? And it says on the the one in China anyway. And the other ones basically say it and not in so clear terms that they are collecting our DNA because they need this massive amount population genomics so they can create vaccines and therapeutics or drugs, biologics tailored to our individual genome. "And then we have Larry Ellison come out with Donald Trump on day two of the administration saying exactly that. We're going to use AI to analyze your blood, which is how they get the DNA gene sequences. It's AI that creates the DNA gene sequences, that sends it to the gene banks. That's why it's electronic and they can send it, because it's using AI. It's not like, you know, a sample that they're sending. Physically, it's a digital code. It all comes together."

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith explains how the Covid PCR "tests" were likely used to collect people's DNA and send said DNA to gene banks. This DNA, Smith hypothesizes, can now be used by Larry Ellison's Stargate program to create genome-tailored "vaccines." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with Charlie Robinson (Macroaggressions Podcast with Charlie Robinson) posted to the Macroaggressions Rumble channel on December 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Genetics is, you know, all basically eugenics. And so fast forward to 2020 when I started realizing, oh, there's these false positives with the test. And I knew that you didn't even need to have a test to be diagnosed with it. The doctors had to look at you and say, oh, I think you have Covid. So that's so smart that you were thinking, oh, it's gotta be a genetic screen. "Because at some point down the line, I've actually found documentation from the CDC that ordered every CLIA certified lab to send genetics, sequences to one of two different gene banks. G I S A I— G I S A I D. So GI SAID, or NCBI, one of those two gene banks. And it did say in the fine print, like, oh, these sequences for Covid. "But I asked David Rasnick, who I did an interview with, and he actually knew Kary Mullis and worked with Kary Mullis at one point, who invented PCR. And I asked him this specifically. I said, so obviously the PCR can run an entire DNA sequence. And here's this instruction. I showed him the document. I said, okay, they're sending these sequences and people are trolling me. You know, the Internet masses are commenting back saying, oh, no, that was just the sequence for Covid, for the variant of COVID because they had like six of them listed out. "And I asked him, do you think they're actually, like, after they run the PCR test and they get this sequence and then they have to send it to the gene bank, do you think they're actually spending the time to edit it and cut out just that section? Or do you think they're just sending the whole thing and then the gene bank can decide which section they want to take as their sequence? And he goes, they don't have the time to go in and edit all of that. I mean, they could, but most likely, no. Most likely they're just sending the whole thing. "Then the gene bank that, that they send it to, and he's shown evidence of how much DNA has been sent to these gene banks. They're tracking all of it carefully. So, yeah, that's absolutely what they're doing. Well, NCBI and GISAID, I haven't looked into who owns them, but there's another one that was creating PCR tests. And I believe that all of the PCR tests were doing the same thing, sending, genetic information back to some, some hive mind, whether that's NCBI or, you know, some other gene bank. "So it's generally the testing places that are, you know, having it send back. So there is the Human Genome Project in China, which is now, I forget the name, it's, it changed its name, but it's the biggest biotech company in China now. And they made PCR test kits, PCR and the IgG, which is the antibody test, and they send it to America. And who do you think is getting those results back? "So our DNA is going to some Chinese database. And even our own American military has flagged that gene bank as being a problem because they have all our individual information. And when you go to that gene bank and the other ones are really similar when you look at like why they exist and what they think they're doing with our DNA. Because I was really interested in why are they collecting all of this? They're obviously going to use it against us in some way. "So what is that? How do we get ahead of that or how do we stop it? And it says on the the one in China anyway. And the other ones basically say it and not in so clear terms that they are collecting our DNA because they need this massive amount population genomics so they can create vaccines and therapeutics or drugs, biologics tailored to our individual genome. "And then we have Larry Ellison come out with Donald Trump on day two of the administration saying exactly that. We're going to use AI to analyze your blood, which is how they get the DNA gene sequences. It's AI that creates the DNA gene sequences, that sends it to the gene banks. That's why it's electronic and they can send it, because it's using AI. It's not like, you know, a sample that they're sending. Physically, it's a digital code. It all comes together."

Sense Receptor

35,149 views • 6 months ago

The sheriff has eliminated the Guthrie siblings and spouses as suspects in Nancy's abduction, while the FBI is actively DNA testing evidence behind the scenes. If they don't get a DNA hit in the CODIS database, they will likely turn to genetic genealogy. The first case in the

The sheriff has eliminated the Guthrie siblings and spouses as suspects in Nancy's abduction, while the FBI is actively DNA testing evidence behind the scenes. If they don't get a DNA hit in the CODIS database, they will likely turn to genetic genealogy. The first case in the

Briana Whitney

24,946 views • 4 months ago

Anu's aunt reached out to me and revealed that Kemi Olunloyo is the one running Anu's account on Instagram. I have always told David to ignore Kemi because her own biological son has publicly disowned her. They said Kemi is the one operating the account and was using the little girl to make money. Because of that, Anu’s family has cut ties with kemi. He also revealed that Davido has done 3 DNA tests and B-Red Adeleke has done 2 making it a total of 5 DNA tests in the family. They told him, they don’t know Anu’s mum but he didn’t listen to them, he wanted to be sure. All came out Negative. He said Anu’s mum admitted she slept with a banker but the man is married and refused to do a DNA test. They told her, go to court, the man will do the DNA. According to him, the Adeleke family cannot and will not accept a child that is not Adeleke. He added that they have helped the family enough and they are still helping them because the family begged for assistance. now it’s time to take Kemi to court because you can’t be impersonating a child and lying on their family. You can’t be lying on my family too. He said why should Davido accept a child that’s not his child? They won’t do that. He said a lot ooo!! He showed the press DNA results of all Davido’s children, including the late Ify Adeleke. Stay patient and listen to all the videos I posted.

Anu's aunt reached out to me and revealed that Kemi Olunloyo is the one running Anu's account on Instagram. I have always told David to ignore Kemi because her own biological son has publicly disowned her. They said Kemi is the one operating the account and was using the little girl to make money. Because of that, Anu’s family has cut ties with kemi. He also revealed that Davido has done 3 DNA tests and B-Red Adeleke has done 2 making it a total of 5 DNA tests in the family. They told him, they don’t know Anu’s mum but he didn’t listen to them, he wanted to be sure. All came out Negative. He said Anu’s mum admitted she slept with a banker but the man is married and refused to do a DNA test. They told her, go to court, the man will do the DNA. According to him, the Adeleke family cannot and will not accept a child that is not Adeleke. He added that they have helped the family enough and they are still helping them because the family begged for assistance. now it’s time to take Kemi to court because you can’t be impersonating a child and lying on their family. You can’t be lying on my family too. He said why should Davido accept a child that’s not his child? They won’t do that. He said a lot ooo!! He showed the press DNA results of all Davido’s children, including the late Ify Adeleke. Stay patient and listen to all the videos I posted.

Big Love

14,888 views • 5 months ago

Pharma insider describes the putrid/horrifying way the Covid-jab "mRNA" is made: "[It's] a synthetic chemical molecule...and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. [which] is literally shit...[and the mRNA has] antibiotic resistant genes...It has nothing to do with human [mRNA]." This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from an interview with Anita Krishna (Anita K) posted to Rumble on July 9, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So especially people need to understand, when we say, in relation to, to these things, when we say DNA and RNA, it has nothing to do with what is, what is claimed to be human DNA and RNA. Nothing. Think of it as like your car has rubber tires today, right? Those rubber tires don't come from the rubber tree. At some point in the past, they came from the rubber tree. That was the only source of rubber was rubber tree. And today they're all synthetic. Rubber has nothing to do with the tree, but we still call them rubber. So that's the DNA and RNA that, that's in [the Covid injections]. It's the synthetic, synthetic molecules, chemicals that these, you know, scientists I make fun of, call DNA and RNA. It has nothing to do with humans. "It's synthetically made. So it's a synthetic chemical molecule, which they, throw into. So the, they make this DNA synthetic chemical molecule using synthetic chemistry methods, and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. E. coli is literally shit. Those are the bacteria that make feces. And so there's a big vat of this beautiful, beautiful bacteria called E. Coli. They throw these pieces of synthetic material. Those, creatures, uptake it, they eat it, and then they replicate that. They replicate very quickly. So in 24 hours, I think it doubles or something. Anyway, so, so they, so they eat these pieces of chemicals, they replicate themselves rapidly, and that's how they grow DNA in the lab. "And, once they've grown enough of it, so, so the, so the synthetic. Yeah, they grow that, that's what gets distributed and to the labs that make the vaccines. Yeah, yeah, it's the first step. So, so the, the, the, the DNA, like the DNA molecule that they throw into E. coli vat is kind of like a negative for the photo, from which then you make a print, which is the RNA. Right. And, and so, so they grow this DNA volume in this E. coli vat. Then they throw— also in that DNA molecule that they design. They. The reason it's not human because it has a whole bunch of features also. Well, it's made synthetically, but it also, in addition to pretending like it has something to do with humans, which it doesn't, they also input into that molecule, what's called, antibiotic resistant genes. "So there's a, there's a sequence there that is, designed to be resistant to antibiotics, in particular kanamycin and some other mycin and neomycin and kanamycin. And then, and then because once they've grown enough in E. Coli, they need to kill the E. Coli. And how do they kill E. Coli? With antibiotics. So they throw a whole bunch of antibiotics into this vat to kill the E. Coli. The process, not a single step of this manufacturing as I'm describing, is completely clean. So all the in-process materials and everything that was done in the previous steps always ends up in the next step. "Even though they're saying they're cleaning, they're removing the blah, blah. But it's never perfect, never complete. So we have now go into the next step. We have some E. Coli cells that haven't killed, they haven't been killed. We have antibiotic resistant genes. We have some antibiotic that's still left over. We have, endotoxins, which is E. Coli's own excrement, extremely toxic to humans. And we have all kinds of other ethanol and other process, in process chemicals that were there. Then it goes to the next step. And the next step they convert, using different enzymes and other chemicals, they convert this DNA molecule into the RNA molecule. The RNA molecule also is not human. It's made synthetically, but also has features that are completely foreign to humans, such as substitution of uridine with pseudo uridine, for which Kariko and Weissman got Nobel Prize. And Robert Malone was very upset because he didn't get the Nobel Prize. He wrote a whole long whining stack about it. "So then, then they, so that they make this RNA, then it immediately starts breaking. So because it's very fragile and it's a very long large molecule, the large molecules are unstable. They always break apart. And this one starts breaking almost immediately. Then we have some, some larger pieces of RNA, then we have some smaller pieces of RNA. God knows what they do. And then they, then they, that's called active ingredient, your RNA. And then they throw it into the cationic lipids, and a whole bunch of other chemicals, to create the lipid nanoparticle that's supposed to contain all this. "Now again, the lipid nanoparticle is not perfect. They break. There are pieces, they're pieces floating around. They agglomerate. So it's a total mess. It's a total mess. And it has nothing to do with humans. Again, nothing to do with DNA, nothing to do with RNA or humankind. Even if it did, even some miraculous reason, they've created something that's perfect copy of a human. A human DNA or human RNA. Well, guess what? You still can't, can't have that in your body because it's not your DNA and it's not your RNA. It's foreign to you and it's going to cause the same damage. But this one is now, you know, we just have chemicals on top of chemicals on top of chemicals. And as I said, the lipids, lipids are cationic and so they'll wreck your blood flow."

Pharma insider describes the putrid/horrifying way the Covid-jab "mRNA" is made: "[It's] a synthetic chemical molecule...and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. [which] is literally shit...[and the mRNA has] antibiotic resistant genes...It has nothing to do with human [mRNA]." This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from an interview with Anita Krishna (Anita K) posted to Rumble on July 9, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So especially people need to understand, when we say, in relation to, to these things, when we say DNA and RNA, it has nothing to do with what is, what is claimed to be human DNA and RNA. Nothing. Think of it as like your car has rubber tires today, right? Those rubber tires don't come from the rubber tree. At some point in the past, they came from the rubber tree. That was the only source of rubber was rubber tree. And today they're all synthetic. Rubber has nothing to do with the tree, but we still call them rubber. So that's the DNA and RNA that, that's in [the Covid injections]. It's the synthetic, synthetic molecules, chemicals that these, you know, scientists I make fun of, call DNA and RNA. It has nothing to do with humans. "It's synthetically made. So it's a synthetic chemical molecule, which they, throw into. So the, they make this DNA synthetic chemical molecule using synthetic chemistry methods, and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. E. coli is literally shit. Those are the bacteria that make feces. And so there's a big vat of this beautiful, beautiful bacteria called E. Coli. They throw these pieces of synthetic material. Those, creatures, uptake it, they eat it, and then they replicate that. They replicate very quickly. So in 24 hours, I think it doubles or something. Anyway, so, so they, so they eat these pieces of chemicals, they replicate themselves rapidly, and that's how they grow DNA in the lab. "And, once they've grown enough of it, so, so the, so the synthetic. Yeah, they grow that, that's what gets distributed and to the labs that make the vaccines. Yeah, yeah, it's the first step. So, so the, the, the, the DNA, like the DNA molecule that they throw into E. coli vat is kind of like a negative for the photo, from which then you make a print, which is the RNA. Right. And, and so, so they grow this DNA volume in this E. coli vat. Then they throw— also in that DNA molecule that they design. They. The reason it's not human because it has a whole bunch of features also. Well, it's made synthetically, but it also, in addition to pretending like it has something to do with humans, which it doesn't, they also input into that molecule, what's called, antibiotic resistant genes. "So there's a, there's a sequence there that is, designed to be resistant to antibiotics, in particular kanamycin and some other mycin and neomycin and kanamycin. And then, and then because once they've grown enough in E. Coli, they need to kill the E. Coli. And how do they kill E. Coli? With antibiotics. So they throw a whole bunch of antibiotics into this vat to kill the E. Coli. The process, not a single step of this manufacturing as I'm describing, is completely clean. So all the in-process materials and everything that was done in the previous steps always ends up in the next step. "Even though they're saying they're cleaning, they're removing the blah, blah. But it's never perfect, never complete. So we have now go into the next step. We have some E. Coli cells that haven't killed, they haven't been killed. We have antibiotic resistant genes. We have some antibiotic that's still left over. We have, endotoxins, which is E. Coli's own excrement, extremely toxic to humans. And we have all kinds of other ethanol and other process, in process chemicals that were there. Then it goes to the next step. And the next step they convert, using different enzymes and other chemicals, they convert this DNA molecule into the RNA molecule. The RNA molecule also is not human. It's made synthetically, but also has features that are completely foreign to humans, such as substitution of uridine with pseudo uridine, for which Kariko and Weissman got Nobel Prize. And Robert Malone was very upset because he didn't get the Nobel Prize. He wrote a whole long whining stack about it. "So then, then they, so that they make this RNA, then it immediately starts breaking. So because it's very fragile and it's a very long large molecule, the large molecules are unstable. They always break apart. And this one starts breaking almost immediately. Then we have some, some larger pieces of RNA, then we have some smaller pieces of RNA. God knows what they do. And then they, then they, that's called active ingredient, your RNA. And then they throw it into the cationic lipids, and a whole bunch of other chemicals, to create the lipid nanoparticle that's supposed to contain all this. "Now again, the lipid nanoparticle is not perfect. They break. There are pieces, they're pieces floating around. They agglomerate. So it's a total mess. It's a total mess. And it has nothing to do with humans. Again, nothing to do with DNA, nothing to do with RNA or humankind. Even if it did, even some miraculous reason, they've created something that's perfect copy of a human. A human DNA or human RNA. Well, guess what? You still can't, can't have that in your body because it's not your DNA and it's not your RNA. It's foreign to you and it's going to cause the same damage. But this one is now, you know, we just have chemicals on top of chemicals on top of chemicals. And as I said, the lipids, lipids are cationic and so they'll wreck your blood flow."

Sense Receptor

58,002 views • 11 months ago

AG Pam Bondi praises law enforcement for cracking the case in the Charlie Kirk assassination and says justice will be served: "The FBI worked long and hard from day one and got this case solved. They worked hand in hand with the local agencies, then gave the gun to the ATF, got the DNA off the firearm, and the DNA matched the defendant in the case. The state government is prosecuting now, and they will most likely indict tomorrow or later this week. They will indict him for first-degree murder, and I think the governor has said they want to seek the death penalty, which is very real in Utah—and they still have the firing squad there. Then we, as federal prosecutors, will look to see if we have federal charges as well, and of course, if we do, we will also indict and work hand in hand with the state to ensure this individual faces the maximum extent of the law."

AG Pam Bondi praises law enforcement for cracking the case in the Charlie Kirk assassination and says justice will be served: "The FBI worked long and hard from day one and got this case solved. They worked hand in hand with the local agencies, then gave the gun to the ATF, got the DNA off the firearm, and the DNA matched the defendant in the case. The state government is prosecuting now, and they will most likely indict tomorrow or later this week. They will indict him for first-degree murder, and I think the governor has said they want to seek the death penalty, which is very real in Utah—and they still have the firing squad there. Then we, as federal prosecutors, will look to see if we have federal charges as well, and of course, if we do, we will also indict and work hand in hand with the state to ensure this individual faces the maximum extent of the law."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

117,425 views • 9 months ago

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

aussie17

440,071 views • 2 years ago

EXCLUSIVE: Scene of Nancy Guthrie private lab testing. I’m outside DNA Labs International where the DNA Testing of evidence is happening right now. I traveled to Deerfield Beach, Florida where lab technicians have been testing critical evidence in the investigation — including the glove found nearly 2 miles from her home. We’ve heard a lot about the discrepancies of sending this type of DNA evidence to a private lab versus a lab used by the FBI, but the Pima County Sheriff, Chris Nanos, says this is their protocol, and a lab that they have used for years. There are only a limited number of private accredited DNA labs in the country capable of this level of forensic work. If possible, DNA Labs International will develop a DNA profile from the glove. According to independent DNA consultant Suzanna Ryan of Ryan Forensic, which is not connected to this case but can speak about how this all works, once a profile is developed it will most likely be sent to the Arizona Department of Public Safety. That’s where the quality control process begins: •A qualified DNA analyst or CODIS administrator verifies the data •The profile must meet strict standards before upload •Once approved, it is electronically transmitted through state systems to the Federal Bureau of Investigation •All systems work together within the national DNA database network CODIS This extra verification step can take time — but it’s critical to ensure the data is admissible and accurate. In this exclusive video, I take you to the scene of where this testing is being done. Because the lab sits on private property, we were asked to leave by property management — but this is where the forensic work is happening. More to come on my YouTube Channel The Ingle Edit and on NewsNation

Laura Ingle

202,050 views • 4 months ago

Hope Beryl-Green, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and is a survivor of MK Ultra, describes hybrid human-animals being made in deep-underground military bases: "They've been taking DNA and just twisting it, for a very long time. [E.g.,] where you're taking DNA and you're twisting it... mixing it with humans, animals, and then you do satanic ritual on top of that where you ask demons to shift people." This clip of Beryl-Green (Hope Beryl-Green), who is also an author and speaker, is taken from an interview with Michelle Moore (The Michelle Moore Show) posted to Rumble on January 9, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Beryl-Green: "But really the thing that was most terrifying for me and the— was the hardest thing to really wrap my mind about, you know, with a lot of the military torture and training for MK Ultra. They do a lot where they go very, very deep into the earth. Like there's, you're in an elevator, but you go down very, very, very far. And it's like the farther down you go, the worse it gets. "So I do remember going down and I have no idea how many stories we went down, but getting off of that elevator and it was just, it was terrifying, really, and most people, the reason I've never talked about it really is because I, thought I was crazy. I was like, I, I, I'm just making this up. "But there are, I mean it's been proven. They, they have been taking DNA and you know, they take DNA from all of these things where you find out where your bloodline, you send off your DNA and you don't know what they're doing with that, you know, and so they're mixing DNA and making very distorted— I don't even know what to call it—" Moore: "So I was sharing with Hope right before we went live is that I had seen some images. Now I didn't keep these, they were very disturbing. But I have come across these images a couple of times online and I was explaining to her, so this looked like half child, half animal and in a cage, and there would be numerous cages stacked on top of each other. And she said yes, that's what she's referring to is things like that. Okay, so they're, they're messing around with the human animal aspect, so to speak." Beryl-Green: "Absolutely, yes. And you know, they've been doing cloning for forever. I mean that's been proven. But they've been taking DNA and just twisting it, for a very long time. And you know, you get in a situation where you're taking DNA and you're twisting it, you're, you're mixing it with humans, animals, and then you, you do satanic ritual on top of that where you ask demons to shift people. "And, and it— And there's a purpose on why they do it down so deep in the earth. It's because they get demonic power the deeper they go into our— into the earth. It's it's like a gathering of demonics. And, and they have the ability to, to do that. So a lot of what they do they cover up through things like that because it's people have no idea."

Hope Beryl-Green, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and is a survivor of MK Ultra, describes hybrid human-animals being made in deep-underground military bases: "They've been taking DNA and just twisting it, for a very long time. [E.g.,] where you're taking DNA and you're twisting it... mixing it with humans, animals, and then you do satanic ritual on top of that where you ask demons to shift people." This clip of Beryl-Green (Hope Beryl-Green), who is also an author and speaker, is taken from an interview with Michelle Moore (The Michelle Moore Show) posted to Rumble on January 9, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Beryl-Green: "But really the thing that was most terrifying for me and the— was the hardest thing to really wrap my mind about, you know, with a lot of the military torture and training for MK Ultra. They do a lot where they go very, very deep into the earth. Like there's, you're in an elevator, but you go down very, very, very far. And it's like the farther down you go, the worse it gets. "So I do remember going down and I have no idea how many stories we went down, but getting off of that elevator and it was just, it was terrifying, really, and most people, the reason I've never talked about it really is because I, thought I was crazy. I was like, I, I, I'm just making this up. "But there are, I mean it's been proven. They, they have been taking DNA and you know, they take DNA from all of these things where you find out where your bloodline, you send off your DNA and you don't know what they're doing with that, you know, and so they're mixing DNA and making very distorted— I don't even know what to call it—" Moore: "So I was sharing with Hope right before we went live is that I had seen some images. Now I didn't keep these, they were very disturbing. But I have come across these images a couple of times online and I was explaining to her, so this looked like half child, half animal and in a cage, and there would be numerous cages stacked on top of each other. And she said yes, that's what she's referring to is things like that. Okay, so they're, they're messing around with the human animal aspect, so to speak." Beryl-Green: "Absolutely, yes. And you know, they've been doing cloning for forever. I mean that's been proven. But they've been taking DNA and just twisting it, for a very long time. And you know, you get in a situation where you're taking DNA and you're twisting it, you're, you're mixing it with humans, animals, and then you, you do satanic ritual on top of that where you ask demons to shift people. "And, and it— And there's a purpose on why they do it down so deep in the earth. It's because they get demonic power the deeper they go into our— into the earth. It's it's like a gathering of demonics. And, and they have the ability to, to do that. So a lot of what they do they cover up through things like that because it's people have no idea."

Sense Receptor

42,595 views • 4 months ago

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

The All-In Podcast

79,717 views • 11 months ago

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."

Open Source Intel

118,783 views • 1 year ago

EXCLUSIVE: the Secret Service has responded to Primetime’s FOIA over the White House cocaine investigation. We now know they’ve been lying to you about everything. After telling us they didn’t find any DNA and destroying the bag of coke, the documents tell us there’s three tubes of DNA that they didn’t destroy. They did find DNA on the baggie- it was processed and moved to an evidence vault for preservation. They now have an insurance policy.

EXCLUSIVE: the Secret Service has responded to Primetime’s FOIA over the White House cocaine investigation. We now know they’ve been lying to you about everything. After telling us they didn’t find any DNA and destroying the bag of coke, the documents tell us there’s three tubes of DNA that they didn’t destroy. They did find DNA on the baggie- it was processed and moved to an evidence vault for preservation. They now have an insurance policy.

Jesse Watters

2,284,639 views • 2 years ago

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 views • 7 months ago

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 views • 4 months ago

NEW: Mother who lost her son and husband in the Titan submarine disaster, says their remains were returned as "slush" in tiny shoeboxes. Christine Dawood told the Guardian that there was a large pile of mixed slush that they couldn't separate. She said it took nine months for her to receive her husband's & son's remains. "We didn’t get the bodies for nine months. Well, when I say bodies, I mean the slush that was left. They came in two small boxes, like shoeboxes," she told the Guardian. The "slush" was what was able to be recovered from the sea floor through DNA testing. "They have a big pile they can’t separate, all mixed DNA, and they asked if I wanted some of that, too. But I said no, just what you know is Suleman and Shahzada."

NEW: Mother who lost her son and husband in the Titan submarine disaster, says their remains were returned as "slush" in tiny shoeboxes. Christine Dawood told the Guardian that there was a large pile of mixed slush that they couldn't separate. She said it took nine months for her to receive her husband's & son's remains. "We didn’t get the bodies for nine months. Well, when I say bodies, I mean the slush that was left. They came in two small boxes, like shoeboxes," she told the Guardian. The "slush" was what was able to be recovered from the sea floor through DNA testing. "They have a big pile they can’t separate, all mixed DNA, and they asked if I wanted some of that, too. But I said no, just what you know is Suleman and Shahzada."

Collin Rugg

2,911,186 views • 2 months ago

Nancy Grace warns sending crucial DNA to a private lab could risk destroying limited evidence, questioning why it’s not being handled by the FBI: “There are cases where DNA is sent to a particular lab, a specialty lab, a lab that could have expertise in diluted, destroyed, old, or degraded DNA. But even if that’s why he’s hanging his hat on an excuse to send it to a private lab in Florida, they don’t have anything that the FBI doesn’t have, so that’s not going to wash. If there’s a small amount of DNA inside one of those gloves and it is sent to a lab for testing, that DNA could be used up in the testing. So what I’m saying is, if that lab in Florida uses up that touch DNA, it’s over. Does he not realize what he is risking? He needs to go back to his basketball game.”

Nancy Grace warns sending crucial DNA to a private lab could risk destroying limited evidence, questioning why it’s not being handled by the FBI: “There are cases where DNA is sent to a particular lab, a specialty lab, a lab that could have expertise in diluted, destroyed, old, or degraded DNA. But even if that’s why he’s hanging his hat on an excuse to send it to a private lab in Florida, they don’t have anything that the FBI doesn’t have, so that’s not going to wash. If there’s a small amount of DNA inside one of those gloves and it is sent to a lab for testing, that DNA could be used up in the testing. So what I’m saying is, if that lab in Florida uses up that touch DNA, it’s over. Does he not realize what he is risking? He needs to go back to his basketball game.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

600,323 views • 4 months ago

"I think that's one of the reasons why our guys plays so freakin' hard -- they see what we're building, they see what we're about and they want to be a part of it. "It's not where we want to be, but there are some foundational things we're excited about. We just have to make sure the record catches up with those things that we're doing"

"I think that's one of the reasons why our guys plays so freakin' hard -- they see what we're building, they see what we're about and they want to be a part of it. "It's not where we want to be, but there are some foundational things we're excited about. We just have to make sure the record catches up with those things that we're doing"

New York Jets

36,984 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸 CATHERINE HERRIDGE: CBS WALKED AWAY FROM ELON BECAUSE THEY COULDN’T CONTROL HIM Catherine revealed CBS passed on what could have been one of the biggest interviews in modern media, not because Elon refused, but because the network did. She said discussions were underway after her work connected to the Twitter Files, and an opportunity emerged to interview Elon live on his own platform. That’s when everything stalled. “I went to the CBS executives and I said, this is the opportunity that we have. He’s saying, I want to do it live and on my platform. He’s one of the most influential human beings on the planet. And the reaction from the executives was, well, we can’t do it live. And I was like, what do you mean we can’t do it live? They said, we don’t know what he’s going to say. And I’m thinking, isn’t that the point of journalism? They said it has to be taped. We have to be able to edit it. It has to be on our platform. We have to control the platform. Everything just got shut down. It was one of the biggest interviews you could ever have. I felt ashamed. I never went back to Elon to say they want to do it, but only if they can control it. I couldn’t do that to someone whose DNA is free speech.” Source: Catherine Herridge

🇺🇸 CATHERINE HERRIDGE: CBS WALKED AWAY FROM ELON BECAUSE THEY COULDN’T CONTROL HIM Catherine revealed CBS passed on what could have been one of the biggest interviews in modern media, not because Elon refused, but because the network did. She said discussions were underway after her work connected to the Twitter Files, and an opportunity emerged to interview Elon live on his own platform. That’s when everything stalled. “I went to the CBS executives and I said, this is the opportunity that we have. He’s saying, I want to do it live and on my platform. He’s one of the most influential human beings on the planet. And the reaction from the executives was, well, we can’t do it live. And I was like, what do you mean we can’t do it live? They said, we don’t know what he’s going to say. And I’m thinking, isn’t that the point of journalism? They said it has to be taped. We have to be able to edit it. It has to be on our platform. We have to control the platform. Everything just got shut down. It was one of the biggest interviews you could ever have. I felt ashamed. I never went back to Elon to say they want to do it, but only if they can control it. I couldn’t do that to someone whose DNA is free speech.” Source: Catherine Herridge

Mario Nawfal

2,483,202 views • 6 months ago