Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Ethan Gutmann says new technology is supercharging the already massive and deeply disturbing CCP organ harvesting industry. “We’re talking about huge numbers here… call it $9 billion per year.” “We don’t really know, but we know that the numbers are huge.” “Once you added in things like ECMO which... show more

Jan Jekielek

215,240 subscribers

14,774 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A planned shutdown? Let’s see what happens. Trumps comments on the shutdown may prove to be very telling: “I told you, we have $17 trillion being invested, so the last person that wants it shut down is us now. With that being said, we can do things during the shutdown that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them, like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like. And you know all – you all know Russell Vought. He’s become very popular recently because he can trim the budget to a level that you couldn’t do any other way. So they’re taking a risk by having a shutdown because – because of the shutdown, we can do things medically and other ways, including benefits. We can cut large numbers of people out. We don’t want to do that, but we don’t want fraud, waste, and abuse. And you know, we’re cutting that.”

A planned shutdown? Let’s see what happens. Trumps comments on the shutdown may prove to be very telling: “I told you, we have $17 trillion being invested, so the last person that wants it shut down is us now. With that being said, we can do things during the shutdown that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them, like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like. And you know all – you all know Russell Vought. He’s become very popular recently because he can trim the budget to a level that you couldn’t do any other way. So they’re taking a risk by having a shutdown because – because of the shutdown, we can do things medically and other ways, including benefits. We can cut large numbers of people out. We don’t want to do that, but we don’t want fraud, waste, and abuse. And you know, we’re cutting that.”

NewsTreason Channel 17

2,241,992 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China? It sounds far too dark, but it’s true. Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time. But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner. China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story. And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America? This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵

Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China? It sounds far too dark, but it’s true. Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time. But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner. China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story. And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America? This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

245,398 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Forced organ harvesting in China may be a $9 billion industry with as many as 90,000 transplants a year. If those numbers shock you, you’re not alone. Most people have no idea how dark the truth about this industry really is. In my new book, I expose how China’s many prisons and camps are used to supply organs on-demand, with prisoners being tested, cataloged, and held until they are a match for a buyer. This system exists because it is protected by silence. My new book exposes the truth—and it will shock you: 🧵

Forced organ harvesting in China may be a $9 billion industry with as many as 90,000 transplants a year. If those numbers shock you, you’re not alone. Most people have no idea how dark the truth about this industry really is. In my new book, I expose how China’s many prisons and camps are used to supply organs on-demand, with prisoners being tested, cataloged, and held until they are a match for a buyer. This system exists because it is protected by silence. My new book exposes the truth—and it will shock you: 🧵

Jan Jekielek

20,791 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 🫀🫁🧠BOMBSHELL DOCTOR EXPOSES THE GRISLY ORGAN HARVESTING SCAM: 🫀🫁🧠🚨 "You CAN'T get organs from a cadaver— they're stealing them from LIVING kids & young adults 16-30 while they're STILL BREATHING on ventilators!" Dr. Paul Byrne reveals they push Narcan on overdose victims just to rush them into the ER for fresh organs... then lie to grieving families: "Your daughter Sally would want to 'do something good.'" "See, you cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ, and you can only get healthy organs from living persons. You cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver.” “So you don't put it on your (driver’s) license?” “And the things I'm telling you is that you are not allowed to hear. And because if you hear it, you will be upset, as all three of you are upset — and rightly so, you should be upset, because whose organs do they want? They want the organs from the, certainly from all children, but especially the people who are sixteen to thirty.” “And their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're going to get their organs. And they do everything to get their organs. And once the organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life.” “And so what they do is they tell the relatives, 'Well, your daughter Sally would really like to do something good, and this is a way to make something good out of this tragedy,' or your son.” “While they have been getting organs from accidents and gunshot wounds, they now get more organs from overdose of drugs than they do from accidents and gunshot wounds combined. There are eight deaths a day from overdose in Ohio, and they get their organs — that's what they want.” “And so what are they doing? They're giving the policemen the Narcan to counteract the drug, which gets them into the emergency room, but it doesn't save their life. It gets them in the emergency room, and they still get their organs. It's so diabolically disgusting. Oh, it really is. See, it's so bad." This is pure evil. Brain death is a LIE. Share before they delete it! 😱 #OrganHarvesting #BrainDeathHoax #WakeUpAmerica

🚨 🫀🫁🧠BOMBSHELL DOCTOR EXPOSES THE GRISLY ORGAN HARVESTING SCAM: 🫀🫁🧠🚨 "You CAN'T get organs from a cadaver— they're stealing them from LIVING kids & young adults 16-30 while they're STILL BREATHING on ventilators!" Dr. Paul Byrne reveals they push Narcan on overdose victims just to rush them into the ER for fresh organs... then lie to grieving families: "Your daughter Sally would want to 'do something good.'" "See, you cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ, and you can only get healthy organs from living persons. You cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver.” “So you don't put it on your (driver’s) license?” “And the things I'm telling you is that you are not allowed to hear. And because if you hear it, you will be upset, as all three of you are upset — and rightly so, you should be upset, because whose organs do they want? They want the organs from the, certainly from all children, but especially the people who are sixteen to thirty.” “And their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're going to get their organs. And they do everything to get their organs. And once the organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life.” “And so what they do is they tell the relatives, 'Well, your daughter Sally would really like to do something good, and this is a way to make something good out of this tragedy,' or your son.” “While they have been getting organs from accidents and gunshot wounds, they now get more organs from overdose of drugs than they do from accidents and gunshot wounds combined. There are eight deaths a day from overdose in Ohio, and they get their organs — that's what they want.” “And so what are they doing? They're giving the policemen the Narcan to counteract the drug, which gets them into the emergency room, but it doesn't save their life. It gets them in the emergency room, and they still get their organs. It's so diabolically disgusting. Oh, it really is. See, it's so bad." This is pure evil. Brain death is a LIE. Share before they delete it! 😱 #OrganHarvesting #BrainDeathHoax #WakeUpAmerica

The Dr. Margaret Show

416,277 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

louisa about deanallie on season 2: “i know we did a lot in season 1 but the fun thing about their relationship is that there’s actually a lot of story to tell still and there’s also the ability to kind of do things in ways that people dont expect, which i do think is something that we have done season 1 and will continue to do, you know, set up what you think you know and then do it a little bit differently”

louisa about deanallie on season 2: “i know we did a lot in season 1 but the fun thing about their relationship is that there’s actually a lot of story to tell still and there’s also the ability to kind of do things in ways that people dont expect, which i do think is something that we have done season 1 and will continue to do, you know, set up what you think you know and then do it a little bit differently”

💭

30,630 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“I was thinking about the Somali’s responses to being caught. The arrogance; Ilhan Omar says, ‘What are you going to do about it? We’re here now; you’re stuck with us… I guess they don’t know that we can take back all that paperwork and put them out. We really need to put them out because this is a hostile population…”

“I was thinking about the Somali’s responses to being caught. The arrogance; Ilhan Omar says, ‘What are you going to do about it? We’re here now; you’re stuck with us… I guess they don’t know that we can take back all that paperwork and put them out. We really need to put them out because this is a hostile population…”

Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾

88,871 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

Jack Prescott

31,505 просмотров • 26 дней назад

🚨 JD Vance BOMBSHELL: "Alien Abductions could be demons" 👽🇺🇸 "You can call it an ALIEN if you want but there is a lot of historical precedent to call it a DEMON" "if we are talking about an extraterrestrial being that is human like but not human, one that contains effectively infinite powers and is torturing human beings, you can call it an alien if you want. But there is a lot of historical precedent to call that a demon" As Vice President, Vance has repeatedly said he is obsessed with getting to the bottom of the UAP files and has the highest level security clearance to do so. What do you think this means for the ongoing conversation around non human intelligence?

🚨 JD Vance BOMBSHELL: "Alien Abductions could be demons" 👽🇺🇸 "You can call it an ALIEN if you want but there is a lot of historical precedent to call it a DEMON" "if we are talking about an extraterrestrial being that is human like but not human, one that contains effectively infinite powers and is torturing human beings, you can call it an alien if you want. But there is a lot of historical precedent to call that a demon" As Vice President, Vance has repeatedly said he is obsessed with getting to the bottom of the UAP files and has the highest level security clearance to do so. What do you think this means for the ongoing conversation around non human intelligence?

Interstellar

57,670 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

183,443 просмотров • 2 лет назад

If anyone you know is an organ donor you need to be aware of this Riley Gaines raising awareness the New York Times is now pushing “We need a new definition of death” because “organs are too rare” RFK Jr. exposed they’ve been doing this illegally, they want to make it legal “This is the New York Times saying that we should expand the definition of death. Are we crazy? Are we literally crazy at that point? This is not organ donation, if you intend on expanding the definition of death to someone who has not yet actually died, that is called organ harvesting. — That's not a hyperbole at all. Organ procurement is like a multi billion dollar industry.” “They want you to own nothing including YOUR OWN organs”

If anyone you know is an organ donor you need to be aware of this Riley Gaines raising awareness the New York Times is now pushing “We need a new definition of death” because “organs are too rare” RFK Jr. exposed they’ve been doing this illegally, they want to make it legal “This is the New York Times saying that we should expand the definition of death. Are we crazy? Are we literally crazy at that point? This is not organ donation, if you intend on expanding the definition of death to someone who has not yet actually died, that is called organ harvesting. — That's not a hyperbole at all. Organ procurement is like a multi billion dollar industry.” “They want you to own nothing including YOUR OWN organs”

Wall Street Apes

223,949 просмотров • 1 год назад

Engfa’s opinion about privacy and artist’s personal matters☝🏼🔒 E: When we’re in the GL/Yuri community, we see all these things. Like, when P’Fah opens TikTok, you’ll see this account, then that account, and sometimes, because we’re in the Yuri fandom, we see one couple getting attacked, then another couple, then another one. People saying this person is talking to that person, and that person is talking to someone else. We see all of it. But I don’t feel like I admire or praise those people for doing that. Instead, I feel sorry for the artists. Because, honestly, they have to put up with so much toxicity just for being in this position. Some people have this mindset of ‘If you’re dating this person, why don’t you make it public? Are you lying to your fans?’ Don’t you ever think about it? Try looking at them as normal people. Imagine you’re going to date someone, or you’re talking to someone because you’re interested in them. You need time to get to know that person before you can give them a status or call them your partner, you know? Imagine saying everything immediately: ‘Hey, I’m talking to this person.’ You’ve only been talking for 3 days, and then on the 4th day you stop talking. What are you supposed to do then? Do you get what I mean? Or someone just messages you, starts flirting with you, you’re about to reply and get to know them, and you immediately announce, ‘I’m talking to this person.’ Then you end up knowing each other for a month and stop talking. What are you supposed to do then? Do you get it? Sometimes, certain things are simply personal. It’s their life, so don’t interfere so much. We know what they choose to let us know. Just because they don’t tell us something doesn’t mean they’re lying. It’s their private life, and everyone needs to manage their own boundaries. Don’t sit there digging and digging and then accuse them of lying. Adults don’t behave like that. // tell them Engfa and say it louder 🗣️🗣️🗣️ please respect artist’s privacy! ENGFA OUR HEART16 #อิงฟ้ามหาชน #EngfaWaraha Engfa Waraha (ตัวจริง)

Engfa’s opinion about privacy and artist’s personal matters☝🏼🔒 E: When we’re in the GL/Yuri community, we see all these things. Like, when P’Fah opens TikTok, you’ll see this account, then that account, and sometimes, because we’re in the Yuri fandom, we see one couple getting attacked, then another couple, then another one. People saying this person is talking to that person, and that person is talking to someone else. We see all of it. But I don’t feel like I admire or praise those people for doing that. Instead, I feel sorry for the artists. Because, honestly, they have to put up with so much toxicity just for being in this position. Some people have this mindset of ‘If you’re dating this person, why don’t you make it public? Are you lying to your fans?’ Don’t you ever think about it? Try looking at them as normal people. Imagine you’re going to date someone, or you’re talking to someone because you’re interested in them. You need time to get to know that person before you can give them a status or call them your partner, you know? Imagine saying everything immediately: ‘Hey, I’m talking to this person.’ You’ve only been talking for 3 days, and then on the 4th day you stop talking. What are you supposed to do then? Do you get what I mean? Or someone just messages you, starts flirting with you, you’re about to reply and get to know them, and you immediately announce, ‘I’m talking to this person.’ Then you end up knowing each other for a month and stop talking. What are you supposed to do then? Do you get it? Sometimes, certain things are simply personal. It’s their life, so don’t interfere so much. We know what they choose to let us know. Just because they don’t tell us something doesn’t mean they’re lying. It’s their private life, and everyone needs to manage their own boundaries. Don’t sit there digging and digging and then accuse them of lying. Adults don’t behave like that. // tell them Engfa and say it louder 🗣️🗣️🗣️ please respect artist’s privacy! ENGFA OUR HEART16 #อิงฟ้ามหาชน #EngfaWaraha Engfa Waraha (ตัวจริง)

bee ✩

222,240 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Liam Coen says analytics should inform decisions, never make them “We leverage analytics. Absolutely. We leverage it for the data and the information to make a decision, not to make the decision. That’s not how it goes. Ever.” “You have the data, AI, analytics, it is unreal. What are the true decisions that lie in the moment, in the now? What are the facts that you need to know? That’s great to leverage.” “We have game management. We have an analytics department to gather that information. But we are not making decisions solely based on those numbers. Ultimately, it has to come from the gut and from yourself.” “Is this the best decision for the Jacksonville Jaguars right now? Because that’s all you can live in. You’re living in every single play.” “I’m going to lean aggressive offensively, especially in year one when you’re trying to instill confidence. You’re trying to instill a mindset of, ‘Yeah, we are good.’ I believe we can go get fourth-and-two. We can.” “We talk about momentum a lot as a team. You can feel that. You can feel momentum. You know when you got it and you know when you don’t. I feed off that as a coach and I feed off the player’s energy on the grass and when they have confidence and momentum I want to roll with it, I want to keep it.” “When you have it you wanna stomp on it, you want to make them feel it.. That’s where the aggression comes in, you want to hold onto that and put your foot on the pedal. And as you grow as a coach there are times where you might be like, ‘Alright, may need to kick here. It’s going to be one of those kind of games.’” “So you have to be prepared, know your gut, go with your gut, feel this, all that’s going on around you, and make the best educated decision.”

Liam Coen says analytics should inform decisions, never make them “We leverage analytics. Absolutely. We leverage it for the data and the information to make a decision, not to make the decision. That’s not how it goes. Ever.” “You have the data, AI, analytics, it is unreal. What are the true decisions that lie in the moment, in the now? What are the facts that you need to know? That’s great to leverage.” “We have game management. We have an analytics department to gather that information. But we are not making decisions solely based on those numbers. Ultimately, it has to come from the gut and from yourself.” “Is this the best decision for the Jacksonville Jaguars right now? Because that’s all you can live in. You’re living in every single play.” “I’m going to lean aggressive offensively, especially in year one when you’re trying to instill confidence. You’re trying to instill a mindset of, ‘Yeah, we are good.’ I believe we can go get fourth-and-two. We can.” “We talk about momentum a lot as a team. You can feel that. You can feel momentum. You know when you got it and you know when you don’t. I feed off that as a coach and I feed off the player’s energy on the grass and when they have confidence and momentum I want to roll with it, I want to keep it.” “When you have it you wanna stomp on it, you want to make them feel it.. That’s where the aggression comes in, you want to hold onto that and put your foot on the pedal. And as you grow as a coach there are times where you might be like, ‘Alright, may need to kick here. It’s going to be one of those kind of games.’” “So you have to be prepared, know your gut, go with your gut, feel this, all that’s going on around you, and make the best educated decision.”

Josh Chambers

10,496 просмотров • 7 дней назад

“The way things are going in my generation, a lot of women are going to grow up to be single and lonely. A good, happy and Godly marriage is an achievement. If you like listen to single bitter w1tch3$ that call themselves feminist that will rub you of your happiness because they are bitter and lonely.” — Lady says.

“The way things are going in my generation, a lot of women are going to grow up to be single and lonely. A good, happy and Godly marriage is an achievement. If you like listen to single bitter w1tch3$ that call themselves feminist that will rub you of your happiness because they are bitter and lonely.” — Lady says.

𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍

35,446 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

HOLY BOOM‼️‼️‼️ He doesn’t need approval‼️‼️‼️No congress‼️‼️‼️ No approval‼️‼️‼️🤣💥💥🤣 “We can do things during the shut down that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them. Like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like. And you know, you all know Russell Vought,. He’s become very popular recently because he can trim the budget to a level that you couldn’t do any other way. So they’re taking a risk by having a shutdown because because of the shutdown, we can do things medically and other ways, including benefits. We can cut large numbers of people. We don’t wanna do that but we don’t want fraud waste abuse, and you know we’re cutting that”

HOLY BOOM‼️‼️‼️ He doesn’t need approval‼️‼️‼️No congress‼️‼️‼️ No approval‼️‼️‼️🤣💥💥🤣 “We can do things during the shut down that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them. Like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like. And you know, you all know Russell Vought,. He’s become very popular recently because he can trim the budget to a level that you couldn’t do any other way. So they’re taking a risk by having a shutdown because because of the shutdown, we can do things medically and other ways, including benefits. We can cut large numbers of people. We don’t wanna do that but we don’t want fraud waste abuse, and you know we’re cutting that”

GP Q

37,606 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨Hurricane Helene victim SLAMS the local and federal government. “It’s weird to me that some 50-some-odd-year-old guy, in the middle of a disaster, has to reach out to the American government to explain to them, ‘Hey, you have resources. You have people who want to help, and you really do have the capacity to do it. Uncle Sam, you can do it.’ This is despicable. Joe, Kamala, do you know you have a military? Do you know that we have spent trillions of dollars on it, and that we can, at the drop of a hat, invade any country in the world, flatten them, and rebuild them? We’ve done it lots of times. Read a history book. Why can’t you use those same resources that we’ve already paid for, here, now? Where are you? I understand there was a vacation you needed to take, Joe, and Kamala, you had some fundraising for your campaign. Suspend that shit and get in here!”

🚨Hurricane Helene victim SLAMS the local and federal government. “It’s weird to me that some 50-some-odd-year-old guy, in the middle of a disaster, has to reach out to the American government to explain to them, ‘Hey, you have resources. You have people who want to help, and you really do have the capacity to do it. Uncle Sam, you can do it.’ This is despicable. Joe, Kamala, do you know you have a military? Do you know that we have spent trillions of dollars on it, and that we can, at the drop of a hat, invade any country in the world, flatten them, and rebuild them? We’ve done it lots of times. Read a history book. Why can’t you use those same resources that we’ve already paid for, here, now? Where are you? I understand there was a vacation you needed to take, Joe, and Kamala, you had some fundraising for your campaign. Suspend that shit and get in here!”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

146,561 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tucker Carlson, Theo Von, Candace Owens — they’ve all said America gets nothing from Israel and that we’re wasting billions propping them up. But do the numbers actually support that? I read an article today that breaks it down in a way nobody in the media is talking about — where the $3.8 billion actually goes, how much comes back to American companies and American jobs, and why Israel may be saving us far more than we’re spending. I don’t necessarily agree with everything in it, but the numbers are real and nobody is debunking them. I also give my honest take on Netanyahu, Trump, the Iran war, and why I think you can’t call a man a dictator on Monday and say he’s being led by the nose on Tuesday. Come at me with the evidence. I’ll change my mind.

Tucker Carlson, Theo Von, Candace Owens — they’ve all said America gets nothing from Israel and that we’re wasting billions propping them up. But do the numbers actually support that? I read an article today that breaks it down in a way nobody in the media is talking about — where the $3.8 billion actually goes, how much comes back to American companies and American jobs, and why Israel may be saving us far more than we’re spending. I don’t necessarily agree with everything in it, but the numbers are real and nobody is debunking them. I also give my honest take on Netanyahu, Trump, the Iran war, and why I think you can’t call a man a dictator on Monday and say he’s being led by the nose on Tuesday. Come at me with the evidence. I’ll change my mind.

Michael Franzese

99,904 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Zack Snyder discusses virtual production technology with the Russo Bros. and explains why he chose to build practical sets for Rebel Moon: "The idea of this sort of virtual production that's really interesting is that it does come back around. The green screen environment is an exclusive world, right? "Like there's not a lot of guys that can make a movie with no sets. Because as it is now, there's a thousand visual effects artists between that green screen and it being in your movie. "In the virtual production version, anybody who walks in there with a camera... The desert is there. And they can go and film it. So in a lot of ways it's kind of... it demystifies visual effects a little bit. "The thing that I've always found a little off-putting about a big green screen environment is it's not really engaging for anybody. Even for us, even for the filmmakers. We've been looking at the concept, we know what it is. "And the actors especially are like, 'I don't know where the hell I am.' Like, 'I guess... Okay, whatever you guys say, I'll do it.'" Anthony Russo: "But for camera operators too, right? It's just like there's nothing to grab on to." Snyder: "Yeah, I don't know, tilt up to the mountain. What mountain?" Joe Russo: "No, no, it's a little higher." Snyder: "Yeah, exactly. I think it's a small mountain. "Anyway, but I do think that the introduction of this kind of virtual productions as a concept really brings sort of physicality back to visual effects. And sort of a fantastic world. "You really can, you know, you can feel it and see it. They can put Atmos in, it can really feel like you're in a place. Which is really just... You're more passionate about it, you know, filming it. "Like I did a small thing that we were just really more of an experiment. And I was really fascinated by like, you know, they're like, 'Okay, here's, we have a cave set with light shafts coming through these holes in the ceiling.' And then we were like, literally, you know, 'Okay, now we're in like this forest.' "And it was the same rocks, but suddenly they didn't look like- they worked in both spots. It was just, I was like, 'Wow, this is really...' And even the focus and everything, the wall understood the depth of field as well. "So like everything, like especially in the eyepiece was like, 'Wow, that's scary.' That's like, feels like I'm there. So I think there's huge potential and hugely exciting future for that technology. "You know, as it becomes more available to like, and also scale, I think, you know, from this to like also being able to have, you know, 100 guys standing around inside of, you know, a giant environment would be just, it's just cool. Which they're doing now anyway, everyone's doing it. "But what was funny, because like on the movie that we're working on now, we ended up, we took a deep dive into it. And it just, the reason why we ended up not doing it in the end was because we just, we have these big war scenes. "And I had like 100 guys, you know, and we were just like, I don't even like, the amount of French reverses I have to do, everyone's brains were exploding. "Because, you know, you're always like, I'm like, 'Oh, just flip the set again and flip the set again.' And then for his reverse, we flipped the set that way and we flipped the set that way. "And so we had to build all the, all in the design, everything was symmetrical, right? Like the bridges and the houses were kind of symmetrical. "So you could always be flipping and not tell... because the sets were all symmetrical. You could shoot them from both sides and it was kind of the same. But the audience couldn't tell because the backgrounds were not symmetrical. "So it was only the immediate stuff, you know. It was, so it was a bit of a brain teaser for everyone. And then in the end, we were like, because of the scale of the fighting, I was like, 'Oh, let's just...' "So now we're just building it up the road. "But it's cool. "It's fun to build a giant thing as well. Just to go there and like, 'Oh my God, we made a village.'

Zack Snyder discusses virtual production technology with the Russo Bros. and explains why he chose to build practical sets for Rebel Moon: "The idea of this sort of virtual production that's really interesting is that it does come back around. The green screen environment is an exclusive world, right? "Like there's not a lot of guys that can make a movie with no sets. Because as it is now, there's a thousand visual effects artists between that green screen and it being in your movie. "In the virtual production version, anybody who walks in there with a camera... The desert is there. And they can go and film it. So in a lot of ways it's kind of... it demystifies visual effects a little bit. "The thing that I've always found a little off-putting about a big green screen environment is it's not really engaging for anybody. Even for us, even for the filmmakers. We've been looking at the concept, we know what it is. "And the actors especially are like, 'I don't know where the hell I am.' Like, 'I guess... Okay, whatever you guys say, I'll do it.'" Anthony Russo: "But for camera operators too, right? It's just like there's nothing to grab on to." Snyder: "Yeah, I don't know, tilt up to the mountain. What mountain?" Joe Russo: "No, no, it's a little higher." Snyder: "Yeah, exactly. I think it's a small mountain. "Anyway, but I do think that the introduction of this kind of virtual productions as a concept really brings sort of physicality back to visual effects. And sort of a fantastic world. "You really can, you know, you can feel it and see it. They can put Atmos in, it can really feel like you're in a place. Which is really just... You're more passionate about it, you know, filming it. "Like I did a small thing that we were just really more of an experiment. And I was really fascinated by like, you know, they're like, 'Okay, here's, we have a cave set with light shafts coming through these holes in the ceiling.' And then we were like, literally, you know, 'Okay, now we're in like this forest.' "And it was the same rocks, but suddenly they didn't look like- they worked in both spots. It was just, I was like, 'Wow, this is really...' And even the focus and everything, the wall understood the depth of field as well. "So like everything, like especially in the eyepiece was like, 'Wow, that's scary.' That's like, feels like I'm there. So I think there's huge potential and hugely exciting future for that technology. "You know, as it becomes more available to like, and also scale, I think, you know, from this to like also being able to have, you know, 100 guys standing around inside of, you know, a giant environment would be just, it's just cool. Which they're doing now anyway, everyone's doing it. "But what was funny, because like on the movie that we're working on now, we ended up, we took a deep dive into it. And it just, the reason why we ended up not doing it in the end was because we just, we have these big war scenes. "And I had like 100 guys, you know, and we were just like, I don't even like, the amount of French reverses I have to do, everyone's brains were exploding. "Because, you know, you're always like, I'm like, 'Oh, just flip the set again and flip the set again.' And then for his reverse, we flipped the set that way and we flipped the set that way. "And so we had to build all the, all in the design, everything was symmetrical, right? Like the bridges and the houses were kind of symmetrical. "So you could always be flipping and not tell... because the sets were all symmetrical. You could shoot them from both sides and it was kind of the same. But the audience couldn't tell because the backgrounds were not symmetrical. "So it was only the immediate stuff, you know. It was, so it was a bit of a brain teaser for everyone. And then in the end, we were like, because of the scale of the fighting, I was like, 'Oh, let's just...' "So now we're just building it up the road. "But it's cool. "It's fun to build a giant thing as well. Just to go there and like, 'Oh my God, we made a village.'

Zack Snyder Film

23,149 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Christopher Nolan reveals no one wanted to distribute his second feature film “Memento” it ended up being nominated for an Oscar Interviewer: “No one wanted to distribute Memento” Christopher Nolan: “Yeah, we don’t have to say it quite like, it quite so sternly” “I mean, the story does have a happy ending and no, it was a lesson in humility, it was a lesson in patience of independent filmmaking” “which is, you finish a film and you really feel you’ve achieved something… but convincing the industry of that, the industry of that” “it can take a long time”

Christopher Nolan reveals no one wanted to distribute his second feature film “Memento” it ended up being nominated for an Oscar Interviewer: “No one wanted to distribute Memento” Christopher Nolan: “Yeah, we don’t have to say it quite like, it quite so sternly” “I mean, the story does have a happy ending and no, it was a lesson in humility, it was a lesson in patience of independent filmmaking” “which is, you finish a film and you really feel you’ve achieved something… but convincing the industry of that, the industry of that” “it can take a long time”

5sta reze

216,546 просмотров • 1 месяц назад