Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇪🇺🦅 Europe is arming itself against Russian drones, including FPVs that attack or monitor infrastructure or equipment. A Swedish firm has created a cheap mini-missile to destroy UAVs, – The Telegraph – Hunts drones using infrared sensors. – Destroys UAVs with a blow, not an explosive — so there...

Maks_NAFO_FELLA's profile picture

MAKS 25 🇺🇦👀

309,617 subscribers

45,874 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Russia is not going to attack Europe, but if Europe attacks us again, this will not be a conventional war — Lavrov 'This would be a different type of war' P.s. It's strange to hear these statements from a high-ranking bureaucrat, especially considering the fact that European NATO members attack Russia literally every day, killing Russian citizens and destroying economic infrastructure. Or perhaps the Russian bureaucracy believes that all these long-range strikes deep into Russia are the work of Ukrainian Nazis alone, and that NATO countries have nothing to do with it? Could this simply be Moscow's final warning, and that tomorrow, in response to further long-range strikes against Russia, Moscow will launch a retaliatory strike against Europe, and not just with conventional weapons? Of course not. So, what the hell is Lavrov even talking about then?
0:32

Russia is not going to attack Europe, but if Europe attacks us again, this will not be a conventional war — Lavrov 'This would be a different type of war' P.s. It's strange to hear these statements from a high-ranking bureaucrat, especially considering the fact that European NATO members attack Russia literally every day, killing Russian citizens and destroying economic infrastructure. Or perhaps the Russian bureaucracy believes that all these long-range strikes deep into Russia are the work of Ukrainian Nazis alone, and that NATO countries have nothing to do with it? Could this simply be Moscow's final warning, and that tomorrow, in response to further long-range strikes against Russia, Moscow will launch a retaliatory strike against Europe, and not just with conventional weapons? Of course not. So, what the hell is Lavrov even talking about then?

Levan Gudadze

42,832 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN’S DRONE HUNTERS: A NIGHTMARE FOR U.S. AND ISRAELI UAVs Even under constant U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, Iran still intercepts enemy drones. The reason lies in a set of mobile, radar-silent air defense systems that are far harder to detect and destroy: 🔸 Missile 358 – a loitering anti-drone interceptor operating in autonomous “free hunt” mode. Flying at ~0.6 Mach with up to 100 km range and 8.5 km interception altitude, it can patrol airspace and engage targets like MQ-9 Reaper or Hermes-900 UAVs. Radio correction can improve accuracy but risks exposing the control node to enemy electronic surveillance. 🔸 AD-08 Majid – a mobile short-range air defense system using optical and thermal sensors instead of radar. Its IR-guided missiles reach ~2 Mach, with 8 km range and 6 km altitude, making the system difficult to detect for aircraft relying on radar warning receivers. 🔸 Repurposed R-73 / R-27T missiles – infrared air-to-air missiles adapted for ground launch from mobile platforms equipped with thermal sights. Similar improvised systems have previously downed UAVs and even aircraft — including a Saudi F-15S shot down by the Houthis in 2018. Unlike radar-based systems that can be quickly targeted by anti-radiation missiles, these mobile defenses are harder to detect and eliminate, allowing Iran to keep enemy UAV operations under constant pressure. Do you think radar-silent air defenses could really help Iran counter Western drones and aircraft?
0:44

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN’S DRONE HUNTERS: A NIGHTMARE FOR U.S. AND ISRAELI UAVs Even under constant U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, Iran still intercepts enemy drones. The reason lies in a set of mobile, radar-silent air defense systems that are far harder to detect and destroy: 🔸 Missile 358 – a loitering anti-drone interceptor operating in autonomous “free hunt” mode. Flying at ~0.6 Mach with up to 100 km range and 8.5 km interception altitude, it can patrol airspace and engage targets like MQ-9 Reaper or Hermes-900 UAVs. Radio correction can improve accuracy but risks exposing the control node to enemy electronic surveillance. 🔸 AD-08 Majid – a mobile short-range air defense system using optical and thermal sensors instead of radar. Its IR-guided missiles reach ~2 Mach, with 8 km range and 6 km altitude, making the system difficult to detect for aircraft relying on radar warning receivers. 🔸 Repurposed R-73 / R-27T missiles – infrared air-to-air missiles adapted for ground launch from mobile platforms equipped with thermal sights. Similar improvised systems have previously downed UAVs and even aircraft — including a Saudi F-15S shot down by the Houthis in 2018. Unlike radar-based systems that can be quickly targeted by anti-radiation missiles, these mobile defenses are harder to detect and eliminate, allowing Iran to keep enemy UAV operations under constant pressure. Do you think radar-silent air defenses could really help Iran counter Western drones and aircraft?

NewRulesGeopolitics

119,673 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

More strikes by Ukrainian kamikaze drones on the Russian Rakushechnoye and Yuri Korchagin drilling platforms in the Caspian Sea, more than 1,000 km from the line of contact. The enemy drones were presumably controlled via Starlink. It can be seen that the platforms were equipped with light air defense systems or man-portable air defense systems to protect them, which they used to attempt to shoot down the drones, but failed to repel the attack. Military Informant Ukrainian drones have again attacked targets in Russia at a depth of 1,000 km, using Starlink. Elon Musk authorized these attacks. When will there be a response? We need to shoot down all his fucking satellites.
2:01

More strikes by Ukrainian kamikaze drones on the Russian Rakushechnoye and Yuri Korchagin drilling platforms in the Caspian Sea, more than 1,000 km from the line of contact. The enemy drones were presumably controlled via Starlink. It can be seen that the platforms were equipped with light air defense systems or man-portable air defense systems to protect them, which they used to attempt to shoot down the drones, but failed to repel the attack. Military Informant Ukrainian drones have again attacked targets in Russia at a depth of 1,000 km, using Starlink. Elon Musk authorized these attacks. When will there be a response? We need to shoot down all his fucking satellites.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

12,506 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Chinese are advancing on 6th-generation fighters, but I have serious doubts about whether this is truly the right path. Recently, the Turkish company Baykar flew two combat drones that operate in perfect synchronization, guided from a ground base. They executed coordinated maneuvers autonomously and are already capable of conducting BVR (Beyond Visual Range) engagements. The Kızılelma became the first drone to achieve an autonomous kill with an air-to-air missile guided by its own AESA radar. This level of Turkish progress, combined with the kill web integration that Chinese drones are demonstrating, isn’t it a strong indication that manned 6th-generation fighters might be an extraordinarily expensive fantasy? I’ll go further: some drones are already reaching speeds above Mach 3.5 - more than double those of the leading current manned fighters. I’m talking about drones capable of high-speed coordinated operations, fully autonomous, with integrated and shared weapon systems, flying at altitudes far higher than conventional fighters, and employing systems similar to Aegis. How much longer until these drones take off in large swarms, equipped with ultra-modern sensors controlled by AI and armed with long-range air-to-air missiles? How could a human pilot, even at the height of adrenaline, make faster and more accurate decisions, involving multiple scenarios and factors, than an AI commanding a pack of smaller, more agile drones operating at different altitudes? We are entering the real competition between man and machine. Even if a pilot in a 6th-generation fighter has control over slave drones and an entire Aegis-like kill web, what is the point of having him there if everything can be done autonomously, more safely, more cheaply, and in far greater numbers? Some argue that the human pilot offers advantages in unpredictable scenarios where today’s AI still fails, and I agree. But I’m not talking about current AI: I’m talking about the AI of 2030–2040, far more advanced than anything we know today. Geran drones equipped with air-to-air missiles prove that air combat drones can be extremely low-cost, while the Turkish tests show, in a far more sophisticated way, that drones designed for air-to-air missions are evolving much faster than 6th-generation aircraft, whose development and production costs are exorbitant. When we put together the Geran, the Kızılelma, and the drone kill web integration the Chinese are achieving, the question arises: is the future really manned 6th-generation fighters, or much cheaper drones produced in greater numbers, better protected, and more capable? Wouldn’t it be smarter to invest in well-equipped autonomous 6th-generation drones rather than treating them merely as wingmen? It seems that keeping a human pilot on board has more to do with ethical principles and preserving our role than with genuine operational necessity. And how would humanity react to the constant killing of human beings by AI-guided drones? Drones will be cheaper to develop, easier to produce, and possibly more agile than conventional fighters, even 6th-generation ones. In cost-benefit terms, the price of a single 6th-generation fighter could buy dozens of equivalent or even superior drones. This would save hundreds of billions of dollars and could put whoever adopts the strategy a step ahead. The Chinese, by the way, are very well positioned in this race, with HALE drones already armed with air-to-air missiles and integrated into an extensive kill web, which I will describe in detail soon.
0:20

The Chinese are advancing on 6th-generation fighters, but I have serious doubts about whether this is truly the right path. Recently, the Turkish company Baykar flew two combat drones that operate in perfect synchronization, guided from a ground base. They executed coordinated maneuvers autonomously and are already capable of conducting BVR (Beyond Visual Range) engagements. The Kızılelma became the first drone to achieve an autonomous kill with an air-to-air missile guided by its own AESA radar. This level of Turkish progress, combined with the kill web integration that Chinese drones are demonstrating, isn’t it a strong indication that manned 6th-generation fighters might be an extraordinarily expensive fantasy? I’ll go further: some drones are already reaching speeds above Mach 3.5 - more than double those of the leading current manned fighters. I’m talking about drones capable of high-speed coordinated operations, fully autonomous, with integrated and shared weapon systems, flying at altitudes far higher than conventional fighters, and employing systems similar to Aegis. How much longer until these drones take off in large swarms, equipped with ultra-modern sensors controlled by AI and armed with long-range air-to-air missiles? How could a human pilot, even at the height of adrenaline, make faster and more accurate decisions, involving multiple scenarios and factors, than an AI commanding a pack of smaller, more agile drones operating at different altitudes? We are entering the real competition between man and machine. Even if a pilot in a 6th-generation fighter has control over slave drones and an entire Aegis-like kill web, what is the point of having him there if everything can be done autonomously, more safely, more cheaply, and in far greater numbers? Some argue that the human pilot offers advantages in unpredictable scenarios where today’s AI still fails, and I agree. But I’m not talking about current AI: I’m talking about the AI of 2030–2040, far more advanced than anything we know today. Geran drones equipped with air-to-air missiles prove that air combat drones can be extremely low-cost, while the Turkish tests show, in a far more sophisticated way, that drones designed for air-to-air missions are evolving much faster than 6th-generation aircraft, whose development and production costs are exorbitant. When we put together the Geran, the Kızılelma, and the drone kill web integration the Chinese are achieving, the question arises: is the future really manned 6th-generation fighters, or much cheaper drones produced in greater numbers, better protected, and more capable? Wouldn’t it be smarter to invest in well-equipped autonomous 6th-generation drones rather than treating them merely as wingmen? It seems that keeping a human pilot on board has more to do with ethical principles and preserving our role than with genuine operational necessity. And how would humanity react to the constant killing of human beings by AI-guided drones? Drones will be cheaper to develop, easier to produce, and possibly more agile than conventional fighters, even 6th-generation ones. In cost-benefit terms, the price of a single 6th-generation fighter could buy dozens of equivalent or even superior drones. This would save hundreds of billions of dollars and could put whoever adopts the strategy a step ahead. The Chinese, by the way, are very well positioned in this race, with HALE drones already armed with air-to-air missiles and integrated into an extensive kill web, which I will describe in detail soon.

Patricia Marins

60,728 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🇺🇦BREAKING | It is expected that tonight there will be a massive air and missile attack against Ukrainian cities by Russian occupiers. 6 Tu-95MS strategic bombers are already in the air, which will likely launch KH-101 type cruise missiles. 🔹 There is also information that more than 500 Shahid-type kamikaze drones will be launched against Ukraine. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:24

🇷🇺🇺🇦BREAKING | It is expected that tonight there will be a massive air and missile attack against Ukrainian cities by Russian occupiers. 6 Tu-95MS strategic bombers are already in the air, which will likely launch KH-101 type cruise missiles. 🔹 There is also information that more than 500 Shahid-type kamikaze drones will be launched against Ukraine. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

34,270 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

As Pakistan continues to fail in stopping India's missile attacks, BBC spoke to some military experts to find out the answer. Experts said, India is using supersonic cruise missile, which can fly more than three times the speed of sound and hit the target. Pakistan could not have stopped these supersonic cruze missiles even if it could have tracked. Experts told BBC, Pakistan does not have the capability of blocking missiles from the sky. Pakistan has the HQ-9 and HQ-16FE system, which works against missiles or warplanes launched from the ground. But it does not have the capability of blocking missiles from the sky. Such a supersonic missile can travel from 3,675 km to 11,000 km per hour. It is not easy to track, target and destroy a missile that travels at this speed. Former Air Vice Marshal Iqramatullah Bhatti of Pakistan Air Force told BBC, if it had been dropped from the ground, it would have taken more time. But when it comes from the sky, the response time is very short.
4:35

As Pakistan continues to fail in stopping India's missile attacks, BBC spoke to some military experts to find out the answer. Experts said, India is using supersonic cruise missile, which can fly more than three times the speed of sound and hit the target. Pakistan could not have stopped these supersonic cruze missiles even if it could have tracked. Experts told BBC, Pakistan does not have the capability of blocking missiles from the sky. Pakistan has the HQ-9 and HQ-16FE system, which works against missiles or warplanes launched from the ground. But it does not have the capability of blocking missiles from the sky. Such a supersonic missile can travel from 3,675 km to 11,000 km per hour. It is not easy to track, target and destroy a missile that travels at this speed. Former Air Vice Marshal Iqramatullah Bhatti of Pakistan Air Force told BBC, if it had been dropped from the ground, it would have taken more time. But when it comes from the sky, the response time is very short.

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury

701,068 просмотров • 1 год назад

We started with simple kamikaze sea drones. Then we built drones with turrets that can shoot down helicopters. Now we have drones that can shoot down Russian fighter jets from the sea. We have developed boats that carry other drones. We also have boats that strike targets on land from the sea. And we are developing more stable drones that can operate longer and more effectively at sea. Soon – and not in the distant future – we will have systems that can operate even in ocean conditions. We are also actively working on underwater systems. So, facing threats in the Black Sea, we are finding the right security solutions. These solutions can be used in your matters as well – including in complex situations like the Strait of Hormuz today. Drones can solve problems that even a fleet sometimes cannot. From my address to the Parliament of the United Kingdom (6/7)
1:00

We started with simple kamikaze sea drones. Then we built drones with turrets that can shoot down helicopters. Now we have drones that can shoot down Russian fighter jets from the sea. We have developed boats that carry other drones. We also have boats that strike targets on land from the sea. And we are developing more stable drones that can operate longer and more effectively at sea. Soon – and not in the distant future – we will have systems that can operate even in ocean conditions. We are also actively working on underwater systems. So, facing threats in the Black Sea, we are finding the right security solutions. These solutions can be used in your matters as well – including in complex situations like the Strait of Hormuz today. Drones can solve problems that even a fleet sometimes cannot. From my address to the Parliament of the United Kingdom (6/7)

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

343,044 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Azov Brigade's Air Defenses Destroy Enemy "Wings" The enemy never stops searching for targets to strike in the rear of the Ukrainian Defense Forces. Any detected facility, including civilian infrastructure, can be hit by Russian missiles, KAB glide bombs, or drones. Azov's air defense FPV drone operators work day and night, systematically eliminating enemy "eyes" and strike UAVs in the air. The video shows a compilation of enemy UAVs destroyed by the FPV drones of the Anti-Aircraft Missile and Artillery Battalion, 12th Special Forces Brigade Azov. Want to take down enemy "wings" and help create a reliable shield for our rear? Fill out the application form on our website at Transfers for active drone operators from other Ukrainian Defense Forces units are also possible.
1:24

Azov Brigade's Air Defenses Destroy Enemy "Wings" The enemy never stops searching for targets to strike in the rear of the Ukrainian Defense Forces. Any detected facility, including civilian infrastructure, can be hit by Russian missiles, KAB glide bombs, or drones. Azov's air defense FPV drone operators work day and night, systematically eliminating enemy "eyes" and strike UAVs in the air. The video shows a compilation of enemy UAVs destroyed by the FPV drones of the Anti-Aircraft Missile and Artillery Battalion, 12th Special Forces Brigade Azov. Want to take down enemy "wings" and help create a reliable shield for our rear? Fill out the application form on our website at Transfers for active drone operators from other Ukrainian Defense Forces units are also possible.

First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine

16,491 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tensions in Europe have escalated after Ukraine claimed that a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile briefly entered Polish airspace during one of Russia's largest combined missile and drone attacks of the war. Poland confirmed an airspace violation, scrambled F-16 fighter jets and airborne surveillance aircraft, and later reported finding a crater and missile-like debris near the border. It has not yet been officially confirmed that the recovered debris belongs to the Kh-101 missile. Ukraine says Russia launched 74 missiles and 284 drones in a single night, while also warning of a critical shortage of Patriot interceptors and other air defence missiles. If confirmed, the incident highlights how the war's risks are increasingly affecting NATO's eastern border. #russia #ukraine #NATO #poland #missiles #MissileDefense
2:50

Tensions in Europe have escalated after Ukraine claimed that a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile briefly entered Polish airspace during one of Russia's largest combined missile and drone attacks of the war. Poland confirmed an airspace violation, scrambled F-16 fighter jets and airborne surveillance aircraft, and later reported finding a crater and missile-like debris near the border. It has not yet been officially confirmed that the recovered debris belongs to the Kh-101 missile. Ukraine says Russia launched 74 missiles and 284 drones in a single night, while also warning of a critical shortage of Patriot interceptors and other air defence missiles. If confirmed, the incident highlights how the war's risks are increasingly affecting NATO's eastern border. #russia #ukraine #NATO #poland #missiles #MissileDefense

Srijan Pal Singh

31,724 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Turkey has successfully launched its Hisar-D RF surface-to-air missile from an Istanbul-class frigate using the indigenous MIDLAS Vertical Launch System for the first time. The missile is designed to defend warships against aircraft, drones, missiles, and other aerial threats. Equipped with an active radar seeker, it can track targets independently after launch, giving Turkish naval vessels a modern air-defense capability. The test is being viewed as more than just a missile launch. It marks a major step in Turkey's effort to build a fully indigenous naval combat ecosystem, joining a growing list of domestic defense programs that include drones, missiles, and next-generation warships. #turkey #navy #missiles #MissileStrike #DRDO
2:53

Turkey has successfully launched its Hisar-D RF surface-to-air missile from an Istanbul-class frigate using the indigenous MIDLAS Vertical Launch System for the first time. The missile is designed to defend warships against aircraft, drones, missiles, and other aerial threats. Equipped with an active radar seeker, it can track targets independently after launch, giving Turkish naval vessels a modern air-defense capability. The test is being viewed as more than just a missile launch. It marks a major step in Turkey's effort to build a fully indigenous naval combat ecosystem, joining a growing list of domestic defense programs that include drones, missiles, and next-generation warships. #turkey #navy #missiles #MissileStrike #DRDO

Srijan Pal Singh

23,011 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

PETRAEUS: Ukrainian special units doing incredible work every night, going deep into Russia in most innovative of ways. They now have drones that are launched from maritime drones, so they can extend the reach of aerial drones right into very ports where Russian Black Sea fleet has to tie up. They now have maritime drones with air defense missiles on them, which have taken down two Russian fighter jets over Crimea. Of course, in Operation Spiderweb, all the drones that were in the roofs of these tractor-trailers simultaneously emerged, and about a million dollars worth of drones took out, damaged, or destroyed five or six billion dollars worth of strategic aircraft.
0:47

PETRAEUS: Ukrainian special units doing incredible work every night, going deep into Russia in most innovative of ways. They now have drones that are launched from maritime drones, so they can extend the reach of aerial drones right into very ports where Russian Black Sea fleet has to tie up. They now have maritime drones with air defense missiles on them, which have taken down two Russian fighter jets over Crimea. Of course, in Operation Spiderweb, all the drones that were in the roofs of these tractor-trailers simultaneously emerged, and about a million dollars worth of drones took out, damaged, or destroyed five or six billion dollars worth of strategic aircraft.

Kate from Kharkiv

17,145 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

❗️Putin’s statements on the use of the “Oreshnik” missile system during a meeting with the Ministry of Defense and defense industry leadership: •Yesterday, the “Oreshnik” tests were successful. We have a stockpile of these systems; •The “Oreshnik” system is not a modernization of Soviet systems but the result of work in the conditions of the new Russia; •Russia will continue testing the latest missiles, including in combat conditions; •No other country in the world has such weapons yet, but sooner or later, they will appear in other nations as well; •The “Oreshnik” system is not a strategic weapon or a weapon of mass destruction; it is a precision weapon; •As of today, there are no systems capable of intercepting the “Oreshnik”; •A decision has been made to begin mass production of the “Oreshnik.” It will be deployed in the Strategic Missile Forces; •Russia is also developing several other systems similar to the “Oreshnik.” 🔎And of course more threats in the end: Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces Karakayev: The “Oreshnik” complex can target the entirety of Europe.
8:28

❗️Putin’s statements on the use of the “Oreshnik” missile system during a meeting with the Ministry of Defense and defense industry leadership: •Yesterday, the “Oreshnik” tests were successful. We have a stockpile of these systems; •The “Oreshnik” system is not a modernization of Soviet systems but the result of work in the conditions of the new Russia; •Russia will continue testing the latest missiles, including in combat conditions; •No other country in the world has such weapons yet, but sooner or later, they will appear in other nations as well; •The “Oreshnik” system is not a strategic weapon or a weapon of mass destruction; it is a precision weapon; •As of today, there are no systems capable of intercepting the “Oreshnik”; •A decision has been made to begin mass production of the “Oreshnik.” It will be deployed in the Strategic Missile Forces; •Russia is also developing several other systems similar to the “Oreshnik.” 🔎And of course more threats in the end: Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces Karakayev: The “Oreshnik” complex can target the entirety of Europe.

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

102,476 просмотров • 1 год назад

‼️To destroy the hundreds of Russian drones that attack Ukraine almost every night, Ukraine’s air defense uses every possible method. For example, Soviet, propeller-driven aircraft such as the Yak-52 are used - they are cheaper than the drones themselves. The destruction of Russian Shahed drones critically depends on the skill of both the gunner and the pilot. It’s extremely dangerous, because the gunner must open the cabin in flight to fire an assault rifle at drones that are only a few hundred meters away. The problem, the gunners say, is not so much hitting the drones as finding them. An onboard radar would be too heavy for the very aircraft. After all, it wasn’t built for war - it was meant to train pilots. Even its propeller is wooden. At the same time, what this aircraft lacks in technical sophistication is more than offset by its price. Older Yak-52s can be bought in Europe for €50,000. Glory to our Defenders! 🇺🇦 📹: DW
1:27

‼️To destroy the hundreds of Russian drones that attack Ukraine almost every night, Ukraine’s air defense uses every possible method. For example, Soviet, propeller-driven aircraft such as the Yak-52 are used - they are cheaper than the drones themselves. The destruction of Russian Shahed drones critically depends on the skill of both the gunner and the pilot. It’s extremely dangerous, because the gunner must open the cabin in flight to fire an assault rifle at drones that are only a few hundred meters away. The problem, the gunners say, is not so much hitting the drones as finding them. An onboard radar would be too heavy for the very aircraft. After all, it wasn’t built for war - it was meant to train pilots. Even its propeller is wooden. At the same time, what this aircraft lacks in technical sophistication is more than offset by its price. Older Yak-52s can be bought in Europe for €50,000. Glory to our Defenders! 🇺🇦 📹: DW

Anton Gerashchenko

171,796 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷Real Reason Pentagon Is Losing Sleep: Iranian Top Drones Tehran has developed a diverse fleet of strike drones designed for different combat roles. In addition to the famous Shaheds, here are the top-notch Iranian drones that keep Pentagon planners awake at night: 1️⃣ Mohajer-6 — The tactical backbone of Iran's proxy forces. This drone is a battlefield multiplier, equipped with electro-optical sensors and capable of firing the Almas anti-tank missile with pinpoint accuracy. It has been exported and used in conflicts from the Caucasus to the Red Sea, systematically destroying armored vehicles and fortifications; 2️⃣ Mohajer-10 — The next evolution in strike capability. It boasts triple the range (2,000 km) and double the flight endurance (24 hours) of its predecessor. Most critically, it can carry a 300 kg payload, including up to six smart bombs or cruise missiles, allowing it to saturate small sections of an air defense network; 3️⃣ Kaman-22 — Iran's "wide-body" combat drone. With a 3,000 km range, it can reach the furthest US outposts. It carries a 300 kg payload of air-to-ground missiles and glide bombs, designed to hit command centers and radar sites deep behind enemy lines, far from the front; 4️⃣ Karrar — The jet-powered speed demon. Unlike propeller drones, the Karrar races to its target at high subsonic speeds. It can be configured as a swarm leader or as a "mini-cruise missile" itself, carrying a 225 kg warhead to strike time-sensitive targets before defenses can react; 5️⃣ Fotros — The heavy hitter. With a 2,000 km range and a 30-hour flight time, it carries up to six missiles. Its large airframe allows for powerful, advanced communication relays, meaning it can guide other drones or missiles to their targets while staying outside the immediate kill zone; 6️⃣ Arash-2 — A loitering munition specifically designed to hunt radars. Once a US Patriot or THAAD battery turns on its radar, the Arash-2, with a range exceeding 1,000 km, can home in on that emission and destroy the system, effectively blinding the base's air defense; 7️⃣ Hadid-110 (Dalaho) — A jet-powered stealth loitering munition fresh from real combat. It hits 510 km/h with a radar cross-section below 0.02 square meters, evading F-15E and E-3C detection. With a 350 km range and a 30 kg warhead, it precisely targets Persian Gulf infrastructure, slipping past Western defenses silently; 8️⃣ Meraj-521 — A man-portable loitering munition that fits in a backpack. With a 5 km range and interchangeable 500g-1kg warheads, it silently strikes bunkers and armor via live video feed. Launched in swarms from ground or air, it dismantles fortified positions without exposing a single soldier to return fire.
1:06

🚨🇮🇷Real Reason Pentagon Is Losing Sleep: Iranian Top Drones Tehran has developed a diverse fleet of strike drones designed for different combat roles. In addition to the famous Shaheds, here are the top-notch Iranian drones that keep Pentagon planners awake at night: 1️⃣ Mohajer-6 — The tactical backbone of Iran's proxy forces. This drone is a battlefield multiplier, equipped with electro-optical sensors and capable of firing the Almas anti-tank missile with pinpoint accuracy. It has been exported and used in conflicts from the Caucasus to the Red Sea, systematically destroying armored vehicles and fortifications; 2️⃣ Mohajer-10 — The next evolution in strike capability. It boasts triple the range (2,000 km) and double the flight endurance (24 hours) of its predecessor. Most critically, it can carry a 300 kg payload, including up to six smart bombs or cruise missiles, allowing it to saturate small sections of an air defense network; 3️⃣ Kaman-22 — Iran's "wide-body" combat drone. With a 3,000 km range, it can reach the furthest US outposts. It carries a 300 kg payload of air-to-ground missiles and glide bombs, designed to hit command centers and radar sites deep behind enemy lines, far from the front; 4️⃣ Karrar — The jet-powered speed demon. Unlike propeller drones, the Karrar races to its target at high subsonic speeds. It can be configured as a swarm leader or as a "mini-cruise missile" itself, carrying a 225 kg warhead to strike time-sensitive targets before defenses can react; 5️⃣ Fotros — The heavy hitter. With a 2,000 km range and a 30-hour flight time, it carries up to six missiles. Its large airframe allows for powerful, advanced communication relays, meaning it can guide other drones or missiles to their targets while staying outside the immediate kill zone; 6️⃣ Arash-2 — A loitering munition specifically designed to hunt radars. Once a US Patriot or THAAD battery turns on its radar, the Arash-2, with a range exceeding 1,000 km, can home in on that emission and destroy the system, effectively blinding the base's air defense; 7️⃣ Hadid-110 (Dalaho) — A jet-powered stealth loitering munition fresh from real combat. It hits 510 km/h with a radar cross-section below 0.02 square meters, evading F-15E and E-3C detection. With a 350 km range and a 30 kg warhead, it precisely targets Persian Gulf infrastructure, slipping past Western defenses silently; 8️⃣ Meraj-521 — A man-portable loitering munition that fits in a backpack. With a 5 km range and interchangeable 500g-1kg warheads, it silently strikes bunkers and armor via live video feed. Launched in swarms from ground or air, it dismantles fortified positions without exposing a single soldier to return fire.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

63,109 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

ELON: ANY HUMAN CAUGHT IN DRONE COMBAT WILL BE KILLED INSTANTLY “At the front of the battle lines, it's going to be just drones. Any humans caught in the crossfire will be killed instantly. You've got drones that are constantly scanning. They're scanning in infrared, scanning invisible. There are thousands of them, or tens of thousands [or more]. You’ve got a million drones coming at you. Do you want to be there trying to try to take out drones with an assault rifle? It's not going to be a good situation.” Source: West Point Military Academy, August 2024
0:39

ELON: ANY HUMAN CAUGHT IN DRONE COMBAT WILL BE KILLED INSTANTLY “At the front of the battle lines, it's going to be just drones. Any humans caught in the crossfire will be killed instantly. You've got drones that are constantly scanning. They're scanning in infrared, scanning invisible. There are thousands of them, or tens of thousands [or more]. You’ve got a million drones coming at you. Do you want to be there trying to try to take out drones with an assault rifle? It's not going to be a good situation.” Source: West Point Military Academy, August 2024

Mario Nawfal

498,988 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇮🇷🇮🇱| A little more to understand... My opinion: The war may end in a few days or last a lot longer—all depending on whether or not the US joins Israel. Israel is not able to fight against Iran for much longer; its interceptors have a certain capability threshold, and reports already suggest it is rationing its interceptor missiles, and we've seen how 12-17 interceptors were launched, yet Iranian missiles still made an impact. It all comes down to whether the US is willing to go to war with Iran or not; it's likely they will if you consider Trump's administrative behavior since he took office. But honestly, if they are smart, they will not. - A little about Iran's missile situation: Israel says it's conducting operations in northwestern and western Iran to prevent the reactivation of missile bases in Tabriz, Kermanshah, and Khorramabad. A significant portion of the Israeli Air Force is now focused on these 3 sites to prevent further missile launches from those locations. This suggests that the sites they claim they destroyed did not suffer strategic damage, and the destroyed hangars were of minimal value. As a result, Israel continuously carries out operations and remains engaged to prevent Iran from reactivating its capabilities in the west. If these 3 regions are abandoned, Israel will move on to target other strategic sites. These 3 missile bases are among Iran's key assets. The missiles are intact and untouched, it's the launchers that are affected, and they can easily be reactivated, but it's difficult under continuous attacks. Other missile bases in the south remain untouched and have so far not been used, as they are probably being reserved for strikes against the US. Missile launches are mainly launched from the center and north of Iran, some from the western regions as well. The reason for limited and isolated launches these past few days has several explanations, mainly that Iran is testing to recognize new patterns everytime a serious attack is carried out, as Israel continuously changes its defensive behavior to prevent Iran's intelligence from learning it; thus, isolated launches, followed by a bigger, deadlier, and more accurate attack with 30 launches as we saw today.
0:09

🇮🇷🇮🇱| A little more to understand... My opinion: The war may end in a few days or last a lot longer—all depending on whether or not the US joins Israel. Israel is not able to fight against Iran for much longer; its interceptors have a certain capability threshold, and reports already suggest it is rationing its interceptor missiles, and we've seen how 12-17 interceptors were launched, yet Iranian missiles still made an impact. It all comes down to whether the US is willing to go to war with Iran or not; it's likely they will if you consider Trump's administrative behavior since he took office. But honestly, if they are smart, they will not. - A little about Iran's missile situation: Israel says it's conducting operations in northwestern and western Iran to prevent the reactivation of missile bases in Tabriz, Kermanshah, and Khorramabad. A significant portion of the Israeli Air Force is now focused on these 3 sites to prevent further missile launches from those locations. This suggests that the sites they claim they destroyed did not suffer strategic damage, and the destroyed hangars were of minimal value. As a result, Israel continuously carries out operations and remains engaged to prevent Iran from reactivating its capabilities in the west. If these 3 regions are abandoned, Israel will move on to target other strategic sites. These 3 missile bases are among Iran's key assets. The missiles are intact and untouched, it's the launchers that are affected, and they can easily be reactivated, but it's difficult under continuous attacks. Other missile bases in the south remain untouched and have so far not been used, as they are probably being reserved for strikes against the US. Missile launches are mainly launched from the center and north of Iran, some from the western regions as well. The reason for limited and isolated launches these past few days has several explanations, mainly that Iran is testing to recognize new patterns everytime a serious attack is carried out, as Israel continuously changes its defensive behavior to prevent Iran's intelligence from learning it; thus, isolated launches, followed by a bigger, deadlier, and more accurate attack with 30 launches as we saw today.

Arya - آریا

55,523 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Gibka-S self-propelled very short-range air defense system, based on a modified Tigr 4×4 armored vehicle, was seen conducting live-fire exercises, with drones serving as the primary targets. The system uses roof-mounted launchers capable of firing Igla-S or 9K333 Verba MANPADS, using the 9M336, 9M342, or 9M39 surface-to-air missiles. The vehicle can carry four additional missiles internally. Its launcher has 360° traverse and an elevation range of −5° to +80°. It is still too early to classify the Gibka-S specifically as a counter-drone system. However, its high mobility and ability to rapidly relocate could potentially improve the survivability and responsiveness of very short-range air defenses, including against small UAVs.
0:52

The Gibka-S self-propelled very short-range air defense system, based on a modified Tigr 4×4 armored vehicle, was seen conducting live-fire exercises, with drones serving as the primary targets. The system uses roof-mounted launchers capable of firing Igla-S or 9K333 Verba MANPADS, using the 9M336, 9M342, or 9M39 surface-to-air missiles. The vehicle can carry four additional missiles internally. Its launcher has 360° traverse and an elevation range of −5° to +80°. It is still too early to classify the Gibka-S specifically as a counter-drone system. However, its high mobility and ability to rapidly relocate could potentially improve the survivability and responsiveness of very short-range air defenses, including against small UAVs.

OSINTWarfare

12,113 просмотров • 10 дней назад