Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Even though intelligence brings evolutionary benefits, it hasn't been worth the time and energy costs for the vast majority of animals. So why did humans end up in an evolutionary niche which rewarded marginal increases in intelligence?

28,402 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel4 месяцев назад

Watch the full episode with Carl Shulman:

Фото профиля Zemoeki
Zemoeki4 месяцев назад

Interesting speculation.

Фото профиля kabini algo
kabini algo4 месяцев назад

This dude sounds increasingly dumber by the minute.. animals are intellectually stagnant?? LOL 😂

Фото профиля Evan 🛜
Evan 🛜4 месяцев назад

This is embarrassingly wrong and outdated information about non human intelligence

Фото профиля Wil Chung
Wil Chung4 месяцев назад

Wait, but primates do have culture. I remember reading some book by Fran de Waal about Chimpanzees passing culture along. And it does pass generationally--like the Japanese macaques and washing sweet potatoes.

Фото профиля Lonely nerd.
Lonely nerd.4 месяцев назад

The paradox for primates is the LLMs haven't moved the needle. 👇

Фото профиля Will Varnum
Will Varnum4 месяцев назад

Evolution discovered the one niche where overthinking had positive EV

Фото профиля Ben
Ben4 месяцев назад

If an animal occupies an easily predictable, stable, role in the ecosystem (herbivore, croc, shark) then it has no use for intelligence. An animal that is a generalist (environment, food sources, etc), needs to be adaptive and have intelligence.

Фото профиля .
.4 месяцев назад

Because we have hands with opposable thumbs

Похожие видео

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles Cheong

13,099 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Reposting because the AEC requires authorisation. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• The Intelligence agencies need to be held accountable for the Covid lab leak. So it turns out that Intelligence agencies knew all along that Covid was a lab leak. I’ve been the only politician in Canberra saying this and the only politician who has called for the role of Edward Holmes, a professor from the University of Sydney to be explained. People First will continue to pursue the Intelligence Agencies for their deceit. He was the one who wrote and co-authored the Lancet paper that ridiculed the idea that the virus was a lab leak. It is was my view he is an intelligence asset and an enemy of the state for covering up the role of the intelligence agencies in funding and creating the Covid virus and the government induced pandemic. And I quote from the link below: “Within hours, Vallance spoke with intelligence officials in the United Kingdom and Holmes spoke with intelligence officials in Australia.” Why would Australian intelligence officials speak with Holmes? Why was he so special? Is it because he was the deputy director of the Chinese CDC. An odd role for an Australian to have. It is incumbent upon the ASIO to ask why he lied about the origins of Covid. I have actually asked ASIO why they aren’t pursuing Holmes, and they claim it’s not their responsibility. This proves that ASIO and ASIS are in on the cover up and are now in fact accessories to the deaths of thousands of Australians. The involvement of intelligence officials regarding Covid should be bigger news than the assassination of JFK or September 11, given the number of deaths. Quote from:

Gerard Rennick

29,416 просмотров • 1 год назад