Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Every founder faces this choice sooner or later: stick with what’s working or take a bet on something new? Entrepreneurs want to move fast. The problem? You can't wait months for enough traffic to validate your ideas. So we built SimGym. A new app where AI “shoppers” can simulate...

10,184 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I just built a Meta Ads diagnostic in Claude Code that tells you WHY your account broke, not just what changed 🤯 It spins up a team of agents that each investigate a different reason performance dropped, then argue against each other to kill the wrong answer before it ever reaches you. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who panic-kill creative the second CPA spikes. If you've watched ROAS fall off a cliff and opened Ads Manager with ten tabs going, you already know what happens next. Your gut says "creative fatigue." You kill your best-performing ad. A week later performance is still broken, because that was never the problem. Guessing wrong is the most expensive move in paid social. This workflow ends the guessing: → One agent investigates each competing theory — creative fatigue, budget and delivery changes, traffic quality, offer and seasonality → Each one is blind to the others, reasoning only from its own slice of the data so they can't bias each other → A refuter agent then attacks every surviving theory and tries to kill it → A theory only stands if the data can't disprove it → You get a ranked diagnosis: the real cause, the evidence for and against it, and the one move to make this week No anchoring on the first obvious answer. No killing winning creative on a hunch. No "here's what happened" reports that never tell you why. What you get: → Every theory tested in parallel instead of one biased guess → An adversarial pass that kills the wrong answer before you act on it → A ranked diagnosis with confidence levels and evidence both ways → A reusable workflow you drop next month's export into and re-run Built 100% in Claude Code with the new dynamic workflows. The first account I ran it on looked like textbook creative fatigue. The workflow disagreed, and traced the real cause to a budget change that had doubled spend and flooded delivery with junk traffic. I put together a full playbook with the exact workflow, the prompt, and how to run it on your own account. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "META" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

12,703 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Imagine you go to a store and you want to buy candy. The shopkeeper knows you're a real kid because they can see you standing right there. Now imagine you send a robot to buy candy for you. The shopkeeper looks at the robot and thinks: wait, who sent this? Is this robot allowed to buy candy? What if someone else's robot pretends to be yours and steals your candy money? That's basically what's happening with AI right now. Companies like Visa let people buy things all over the world. But now, smart computer robots (AI agents) want to buy things too. Shop around, compare prices, even pay for stuff. Visa looked at this and said: nope, not yet. Because they have no way to check if the robot is real, who it belongs to, or if it's allowed to spend that money. The problem is that all the rules we have for checking identity - showing your ID, scanning your face, typing your password - only work for humans. Robots can't do any of that. Worse, bad robots can actually copy and fake human identities really well. So Evin McMullen evin, Billions Network co-founder and CEO, says we need a new kind of ID system. One where you can prove something is true without showing all your private stuff. Like proving you're tall enough for a ride without telling anyone your exact height. That's called zero-knowledge proof. And for the robots specifically, we need something called KYA - Know Your Agent. It's like giving every robot its own ID card that says: this is who I am, this is what I'm allowed to do, and this is the human responsible for me. Until we build that, the robot economy can't really get going. Here is Evin’s Thought Leader article at Silicon Valleys Journal

Billions Network

21,764 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

things to know about wv dms from someone who has experience with the bubble app and had a chat with skz hyunjin for over a year: - its 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹, it’s the members themselves - for us it’s a 1:1 chat with the idol but for them it’s like a groupchat with all the people who paid - they can see and directly reply to you if they want to but there’s too many ppl so it’s hard for them to see. 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗲’𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆!!! they can actually select the message they want so if they ever reply to you you’ll know for sure. - they have an option in their version of the app where they click and it automatically mentions the name you have set on the app and it looks like he’s directly addressing you but it’s the same for every fan. - theres a 1 next to the messages, if it disappears, the member is in the chat, doesn’t mean he read specifically your message, remember it’s a gc for them. - the translations are bad so it’ll look weird, you can deactivate the automatic translation on the 3 dots on the upper right. make sure you always look for translations on here (ENHYPEN WEVERSE) before you bring something to tl. finally, ai bots reply immediately, once the boys go inactive or get busy, no matter how many messages you send you won’t get a reply. stop saying it’s fake or ai, i know its weird and you guys are new to it and it seems impossible bc they’re busy but its the same as when they come to weverse and reply to a bunch of people, they have time for that. you will see some members are more active and chatty than others too. please be careful with your words, these are the members’s words. + here’s jumgwon sending a text while on live earlier:

eris ⁷

40,703 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce