Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Every major technological breakthrough has been met with fear that it would destroy jobs, and AI is no different. I’ve heard the concerns that it will replace workers, invade privacy, or do more harm than good. But history suggests otherwise. Just as the internet created entirely new industries and...

kevinolearytv's profile picture

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

1,206,354 subscribers

16,040 просмотров • 27 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Will AI replace software engineers? Actually, no. The Self-Writing Internet will create MORE tech jobs. It will empower 8 billion non-technical people to become prompt engineers and tech entrepreneurs, while generating millions of new apps that need professional human developers.
0:37

Will AI replace software engineers? Actually, no. The Self-Writing Internet will create MORE tech jobs. It will empower 8 billion non-technical people to become prompt engineers and tech entrepreneurs, while generating millions of new apps that need professional human developers.

DFINITY Foundation

16,305 просмотров • 1 год назад

Andrew Yang says AI will create new jobs but will destroy millions “AI is going to create many new jobs that we cannot predict. Millions of Americans are going to lose their jobs to AI, both those statements are 100% true” “The issue in my mind is that many of the jobs that are gonna be created are gonna be for different people with different skills than the jobs that got eliminated, and the number of jobs eliminated will be many times higher” “The comparison I make for White Collar folks is when the internet came and did a number on local newspapers. Some people would say, oh, there’ll be new media jobs, which there were…” “But for every 10 local reporters that lost their jobs, maybe you had 3 that then worked at BuzzFeed and now BuzzFeed is disappearing too” “The numbers just don’t match up”
1:00

Andrew Yang says AI will create new jobs but will destroy millions “AI is going to create many new jobs that we cannot predict. Millions of Americans are going to lose their jobs to AI, both those statements are 100% true” “The issue in my mind is that many of the jobs that are gonna be created are gonna be for different people with different skills than the jobs that got eliminated, and the number of jobs eliminated will be many times higher” “The comparison I make for White Collar folks is when the internet came and did a number on local newspapers. Some people would say, oh, there’ll be new media jobs, which there were…” “But for every 10 local reporters that lost their jobs, maybe you had 3 that then worked at BuzzFeed and now BuzzFeed is disappearing too” “The numbers just don’t match up”

Jack

70,358 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will *create* more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be *faster* than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast
4:44

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will *create* more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be *faster* than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

316,935 просмотров • 1 год назад

We are harnessing the benefits of AI to create jobs, boost growth and drive prosperity in the places that need it most. The new AI Growth Zone in South Wales and increased investment into AI will help us to seize the opportunities of AI and build a better Britain.
0:57

We are harnessing the benefits of AI to create jobs, boost growth and drive prosperity in the places that need it most. The new AI Growth Zone in South Wales and increased investment into AI will help us to seize the opportunities of AI and build a better Britain.

Liz Kendall

79,280 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

#APLeadsGreenEnergy Let’s talk about the scary side of AI. Will there be job losses? Will the entire IT sector be transformed and basic programming skills would no longer be relevant? I disagree. If you go back in history - every Industrial Revolution has created more jobs than it’s replaced. But it’s created jobs in countries or states that were ready to embrace the revolution. We have to embrace this change. That’s my job as HRD and education minister, to create courses and curriculum to make AP’s youth ready for the AI and quantum computing wave. I shared my thoughts at the Swaniti Global workshop on green skilling today in Vijaywada.
1:12

#APLeadsGreenEnergy Let’s talk about the scary side of AI. Will there be job losses? Will the entire IT sector be transformed and basic programming skills would no longer be relevant? I disagree. If you go back in history - every Industrial Revolution has created more jobs than it’s replaced. But it’s created jobs in countries or states that were ready to embrace the revolution. We have to embrace this change. That’s my job as HRD and education minister, to create courses and curriculum to make AP’s youth ready for the AI and quantum computing wave. I shared my thoughts at the Swaniti Global workshop on green skilling today in Vijaywada.

Lokesh Nara

41,077 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

.Anthony Pompliano 🌪 is exactly right. while the scope of work of some jobs may suffer in the mid-term, entirely new categories of work are continuing to emerge. AI will ultimately create a lot more jobs than it displaces. and those displaced, in almost every case, will be evolutions of the same job.
0:53

.Anthony Pompliano 🌪 is exactly right. while the scope of work of some jobs may suffer in the mid-term, entirely new categories of work are continuing to emerge. AI will ultimately create a lot more jobs than it displaces. and those displaced, in almost every case, will be evolutions of the same job.

Ali Ansari

20,188 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"
1:29

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Haider.

31,627 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NEW: Elon Musk on AI and Robotics: "Assuming the current trend of artificial intelligence and robotics continues, the AI and robots will be able to do anything that that humans want them to do, but AI and robotics will be able to provide all the goods and services that anyone could possibly want. People will be able to wherever they want with their free time, work will be optional. If I could, I would certainly slow down AI and robotics, but I can't just seems to be well, it's advancing at a very rapid pace, whether I like it or not."
1:27

NEW: Elon Musk on AI and Robotics: "Assuming the current trend of artificial intelligence and robotics continues, the AI and robots will be able to do anything that that humans want them to do, but AI and robotics will be able to provide all the goods and services that anyone could possibly want. People will be able to wherever they want with their free time, work will be optional. If I could, I would certainly slow down AI and robotics, but I can't just seems to be well, it's advancing at a very rapid pace, whether I like it or not."

DogeDesigner

31,308 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Brandon, Mississippi has been selected for the third largest economic development project in state history: AVAIO Digital is investing $6 billion to build a data center campus at the East Metropolitan Center Business and Industrial Park in Rankin County. This project will create 60 direct, high-tech jobs once completed - furthering the transformation of our economy to the jobs of the future. Construction and other related industries will lead to hundreds of additional indirect jobs. It’s more proof that Mississippi has momentum and THIS is our time!
0:47

Brandon, Mississippi has been selected for the third largest economic development project in state history: AVAIO Digital is investing $6 billion to build a data center campus at the East Metropolitan Center Business and Industrial Park in Rankin County. This project will create 60 direct, high-tech jobs once completed - furthering the transformation of our economy to the jobs of the future. Construction and other related industries will lead to hundreds of additional indirect jobs. It’s more proof that Mississippi has momentum and THIS is our time!

Governor Tate Reeves

33,114 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.
1:48

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.

TBPN

21,828 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

WATCH: Boos break out during former Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s commencement speech after he addressed fears about AI reshaping the workforce. “There is a fear in your generation that the future has already been written... The question is not whether AI will shape the world. It will. The question is whether you will help shape artificial intelligence." Schmidt said those concerns are “rational” as AI rapidly transforms industries, but pushed graduates to help build the future instead of rejecting the technology outright — prompting audible boos from some in the crowd.
0:32

WATCH: Boos break out during former Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s commencement speech after he addressed fears about AI reshaping the workforce. “There is a fear in your generation that the future has already been written... The question is not whether AI will shape the world. It will. The question is whether you will help shape artificial intelligence." Schmidt said those concerns are “rational” as AI rapidly transforms industries, but pushed graduates to help build the future instead of rejecting the technology outright — prompting audible boos from some in the crowd.

Fox News

166,942 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”
1:43

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

ELON: "GROK 4 IS THE SMARTEST AI IN THE WORLD" "Grok 4 is better than PhD level in every subject, no exceptions. At times, it may lack common sense, and it has not yet invented new technologies or discovered new physics, but that is just a matter of time. I think it may discover new technologies as soon as later this year, and I would be shocked if it has not done so next year." Source: Elon Musk
0:40

ELON: "GROK 4 IS THE SMARTEST AI IN THE WORLD" "Grok 4 is better than PhD level in every subject, no exceptions. At times, it may lack common sense, and it has not yet invented new technologies or discovered new physics, but that is just a matter of time. I think it may discover new technologies as soon as later this year, and I would be shocked if it has not done so next year." Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

78,794 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

“Today’s LLMs are the ‘Mainframe Computers’ of our generation” I was on Bloomberg TV today discussing Sakana AI, and to share my view that today’s LLMs are our generation’s “Mainframe Computers”. We are still in the very early stages of AI, and it is inevitable, due to market competition and global innovation (especially from those innovating with resource constraints), that this technology will become a million times more efficient. There is a narrative established in Silicon Valley that AI is a “Winner Takes All” technology, and that scaling up existing models and consuming ever greater resources will require (and even justify) the largest investments of our generation, in order to “win” the AI race. In contrast, I believe that AI is not a “winner takes all” technology. LLMs will be commoditized, become vastly more efficient, and made widely available in all countries. Ultimately, there will be thousands, if not millions, of AI models used by everyone. Just like with the evolution of early clunky mainframe computers to modern computing, how we use AI today will look very different in a few years (or even a year from now), compared to today’s ‘clunky’ LLMs.
7:17

“Today’s LLMs are the ‘Mainframe Computers’ of our generation” I was on Bloomberg TV today discussing Sakana AI, and to share my view that today’s LLMs are our generation’s “Mainframe Computers”. We are still in the very early stages of AI, and it is inevitable, due to market competition and global innovation (especially from those innovating with resource constraints), that this technology will become a million times more efficient. There is a narrative established in Silicon Valley that AI is a “Winner Takes All” technology, and that scaling up existing models and consuming ever greater resources will require (and even justify) the largest investments of our generation, in order to “win” the AI race. In contrast, I believe that AI is not a “winner takes all” technology. LLMs will be commoditized, become vastly more efficient, and made widely available in all countries. Ultimately, there will be thousands, if not millions, of AI models used by everyone. Just like with the evolution of early clunky mainframe computers to modern computing, how we use AI today will look very different in a few years (or even a year from now), compared to today’s ‘clunky’ LLMs.

hardmaru

165,273 просмотров • 1 год назад