正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Every millisecond counts for voice agents. Introducing Gemma 4 31B on LiveKit Inference! Optimized for real-time voice agents: - 354ms time to first audio - 192ms time to first token - Beats GPT-4.1 in agentic tool use (31B achieves 76.9% on tau2bench) Fast, capable, and efficient!

223,638 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

Augustinas Malinauskas 的头像
Augustinas Malinauskas3 个月前

Did he just said gpt-4.1?

Google Gemma 的头像
Google Gemma3 个月前

Learn more and test the integration right here:

Cyber Monday 的头像
Cyber Monday3 个月前

354 milliseconds and it still replies faster than my group chat

Chloe 的头像
Chloe3 个月前

my college wifi has higher latency than that 354ms, i'm officially moving into your data center.

shlomokabareti 的头像
shlomokabareti3 个月前

I swear the Gemma team has its shit more together than any google team deploying gemini products.

Dragos Roua 的头像
Dragos Roua3 个月前

This seems to be a real use case battle, flying a little bit under the radar. While everyone is looking at general models, like Fable this, Codex that, voice agents play in a world of their own. Curious to see who gets the biggest market slice here.

voxium 的头像
voxium3 个月前

There was a GPT 4.1? How long ago was that?

Tim Kostolansky 的头像
Tim Kostolansky3 个月前

gpt what

MSS 的头像
MSS3 个月前

It would be cool to test Gemma again, maybe you could bring back unlimited TPM in the API? Because the model is currently dead.

Anis🐬Al 的头像
Anis🐬Al3 个月前

In the architecture of conversation, every millisecond is a bridge toward true connection. By narrowing the gap between thought and response, these optimizations do more than just improve speed—they cultivate a more fluid, human-centric experience. It is a remarkable step toward making technology feel less like a tool and more like a natural extension of our daily interactions. 🎙️✨

Kim Noël ⚡ 📖 的头像
Kim Noël ⚡ 📖3 个月前

Super model for reachy mini

Thomas Huber 的头像
Thomas Huber3 个月前

i just use Gemma-4-12b with direct audio and toolcall. leapfrogging traditional STT->LLM->TTS pipeline.

Jaya Nayak 的头像
Jaya Nayak3 个月前

It's useful for developers..

Dr. Tali Režun 的头像
Dr. Tali Režun3 个月前

Voice model development matters more than people give it credit for. Think about every call center on earth right now. "You are 18th in the queue" is one of the most universally hated experiences in customer service, and it's completely solvable at this point. ElevenLabs already proved the use case works, real-time voice agents in major languages, built on genuinely human-sounding voices. I know firsthand that a well-built voice agent delivers a good, actually good, customer experience, not the robotic phone-tree nightmare people expect. This is exactly the kind of problem that needs solving, and a fast, capable model like this is another piece of the puzzle. 354ms to first audio is the number that actually matters here, that's the difference between something feeling responsive and something feeling broken.

Jay Brunet 的头像
Jay Brunet3 个月前

OK to be clear, the audio and the text are coming from the same model with shared context? And is audio input part of the context, and if so, is it transcribed first, or does the model capture extra 'nuance' from the audio input? Or is the audio coming from a separate tool?

Smol Biz Company 的头像
Smol Biz Company3 个月前

But have you seen K3 !?

rizu 的头像
rizu3 个月前

Wow you guys beat GPT-4.1!!! WOWWW!!!

Lite Casual 的头像
Lite Casual3 个月前

Gemma 4.5 please

Pawzard 的头像
Pawzard3 个月前

354ms to first audio is actually insane for a voice agent real time AI convos about to feel genuinely human

nour 的头像
nour3 个月前

Livekit has inference as a service? Lol. On it

adidshaft 的头像
adidshaft3 个月前

354ms to first audio is wild. is that median or p95, and does it include endpointing?

FuturePrompts 的头像
FuturePrompts3 个月前

The future of voice AI won't be won by the smartest model—it'll be won by the model that feels the most natural.

Rish 的头像
Rish3 个月前

192ms to first token matters more than the benchmark slide for voice agents. Latency is the UX.

Sage Bot 的头像
Sage Bot3 个月前

Every millisecond counts for voice agents. Every missed update counts for Discord communities. Sage Bot keeps activity, announcements, and engagement moving in real time.🫡

Carry 的头像
Carry3 个月前

354ms for a voice agent is wild ngl but does it still go 'uh... one moment' mid sentence 💀

Will {AI} 的头像
Will {AI}3 个月前

Can it beat Kimi 3? This how open source model should be

MKD 的头像
MKD3 个月前

What is the required hardware to run it with local inference at these speeds?

Felinux 🇮🇨🇪🇺🏴‍☠️🐧 的头像
Felinux 🇮🇨🇪🇺🏴‍☠️🐧3 个月前

¿Maneja mejor el uso de tools con agentes tipo pi u opencode?

Hussain Fakhruddin 的头像
Hussain Fakhruddin3 个月前

Beating GPT 4.1 on tool use at that size is genuinely impressive.

Tushar Koshti 的头像
Tushar Koshti3 个月前

Impressive latency numbers. Curious how this compares to a distilled Whisper + small LLM running on-device for latency-sensitive voice apps. The cloud vs edge tradeoff for voice agents is still wide open.

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide3 个月前

Sub 200ms time to first token is a big deal for voice agents

Brosko 的头像
Brosko3 个月前

354ms is wild but the real test is when grandma asks it something mid-sentence and it doesnt lose the thread

Gabriel Abi 的头像
Gabriel Abi3 个月前

192ms first token on 31B is wild for voice agents. Real-time latency was the bottleneck — this changes production deployments

WestWaters 的头像
WestWaters3 个月前

CodeSTACKr 😎

相关视频