Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Every moon hoax "evidence" point has prosaic explanations. Shadows converging? That's what happens when you photograph parallel lines from an angle. That’s something anyone can recreate in any parking lot. A single light source doesn't mean shadows appear parallel in photos, it means they're actually parallel in three-dimensional space....

randallwcarlson's profile picture

Randall Carlson

163,155 subscribers

23,152 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Moon landing deniers claim that because the Sun is distant, all lunar shadows must look perfectly parallel. When they see shadows that appear to diverge, they call it proof of a studio hoax. That ignores perspective. Parallel light does not mean parallel-looking lines in a photograph. In perspective projection, parallel lines in 3D space appear to converge or diverge depending on camera position. Add uneven terrain and the apparent angles shift even more. As shown in this drone video, when viewed straight down, parallel shadows appear parallel. Lower the camera and tilt the view, and those same shadows begin to fan outward - even though nothing about the light or objects changed. It’s geometry, not Hollywood.
0:23

Moon landing deniers claim that because the Sun is distant, all lunar shadows must look perfectly parallel. When they see shadows that appear to diverge, they call it proof of a studio hoax. That ignores perspective. Parallel light does not mean parallel-looking lines in a photograph. In perspective projection, parallel lines in 3D space appear to converge or diverge depending on camera position. Add uneven terrain and the apparent angles shift even more. As shown in this drone video, when viewed straight down, parallel shadows appear parallel. Lower the camera and tilt the view, and those same shadows begin to fan outward - even though nothing about the light or objects changed. It’s geometry, not Hollywood.

Alex Boge

20,182 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

So there is some pretty good video going around ... of Bledsoe orbs ... attached below. And what Chris Bledsoe and others are capturing on video...especially when it’s slowed down, zoomed in, and cleaned up with AI...is not just light in the sky. It’s something pressing through our reality. These so-called “orbs” don’t move like drones, planes, or ships. They modulate, distort, ripple. They look the same from every angle. And when you really examine the footage, it becomes obvious... they aren’t in our space. They're pressing into it. Think about it...when a 3D object pushes into a 2D world, the beings in that 2D plane don’t see the object for what it is. They only see the cross-section, the small piece that intersects their limited perspective. That’s us. That’s why these “orbs” always appear spherical...because we’re only capable of perceiving the surface of something that exists in a higher dimension. These aren’t spheres flying in our world... they’re eyes looking into it. Dimensional projections, not physical crafts. And the way they distort their surroundings? You know that flickering, shimmering, fringing around the edges? That’s not lens flare or poor focus... that’s spacetime warping at the point of contact. Just like a finger pushing into water, you don’t just see the finger...you see the ripples, the tension, the bending of the surface. These orbs create the same effect. They’re nudging through the membrane of our dimension, scanning, observing, possibly even communicating... but they’re doing it from the outside. This matches the behavior of beings in religious texts, ancient myths, and esoteric traditions. Messengers of light. Watchers. Holy lights that appear and vanish. Maybe they weren’t myths or metaphors... maybe they were the same phenomena viewed by ancient eyes. If we’re living in a simulation...or even a holographic layer of reality...these orbs could be viewports. Not flying saucers, but eyes of the Architect, peering in to observe, intervene, or remind us that something greater is watching. Think of reality like the surface of a drum. You and I live on the skin of it...flat, stretched, vibrating. Every now and then, something from outside taps it...not hard, not violently, just enough to make the surface ripple and a visible point appear. That’s the orb. Not the finger itself… but the pressure point where it meets our world. That’s what we’re seeing. Not a UFO. Not a sphere. A point of contact from somewhere beyond. And once you understand that... everything changes....this is beyond a good video!!!
1:25

So there is some pretty good video going around ... of Bledsoe orbs ... attached below. And what Chris Bledsoe and others are capturing on video...especially when it’s slowed down, zoomed in, and cleaned up with AI...is not just light in the sky. It’s something pressing through our reality. These so-called “orbs” don’t move like drones, planes, or ships. They modulate, distort, ripple. They look the same from every angle. And when you really examine the footage, it becomes obvious... they aren’t in our space. They're pressing into it. Think about it...when a 3D object pushes into a 2D world, the beings in that 2D plane don’t see the object for what it is. They only see the cross-section, the small piece that intersects their limited perspective. That’s us. That’s why these “orbs” always appear spherical...because we’re only capable of perceiving the surface of something that exists in a higher dimension. These aren’t spheres flying in our world... they’re eyes looking into it. Dimensional projections, not physical crafts. And the way they distort their surroundings? You know that flickering, shimmering, fringing around the edges? That’s not lens flare or poor focus... that’s spacetime warping at the point of contact. Just like a finger pushing into water, you don’t just see the finger...you see the ripples, the tension, the bending of the surface. These orbs create the same effect. They’re nudging through the membrane of our dimension, scanning, observing, possibly even communicating... but they’re doing it from the outside. This matches the behavior of beings in religious texts, ancient myths, and esoteric traditions. Messengers of light. Watchers. Holy lights that appear and vanish. Maybe they weren’t myths or metaphors... maybe they were the same phenomena viewed by ancient eyes. If we’re living in a simulation...or even a holographic layer of reality...these orbs could be viewports. Not flying saucers, but eyes of the Architect, peering in to observe, intervene, or remind us that something greater is watching. Think of reality like the surface of a drum. You and I live on the skin of it...flat, stretched, vibrating. Every now and then, something from outside taps it...not hard, not violently, just enough to make the surface ripple and a visible point appear. That’s the orb. Not the finger itself… but the pressure point where it meets our world. That’s what we’re seeing. Not a UFO. Not a sphere. A point of contact from somewhere beyond. And once you understand that... everything changes....this is beyond a good video!!!

Jason Wilde

34,419 просмотров • 1 год назад

Polkadot ran a major stress test, Spammening, in December 2024 to prove its infra can handle extreme txn loads in a live environment with real economic stakes. The result was 143K TPS, using just 23% of the network’s capacity. But the elephant in the room—does anyone outside of Polkadot even care. TPS is a tricky metric, especially today. Polkadot is a heterogeneous sharded blockchain and was used to be referred as layer 0. Essentially designed to orchestrate multiple chains in parallel, not maximize base layer txns. Therefore fundamentally it isn’t built for single-chain TPS races, but for very high throughput across multiple chains. So Polkadot’s TPS doesn’t compare neatly to monolithic chains, and that led to it staying out of TPS-focused optics in the past. As a result, it’s often misunderstood or seen as slow by this metric. And today, Polkadot has shifted from a chain-centric approach to a blockspace-centric one. It’s no longer about chains but about blockspace and cores—operating much like your multi-core computer. Aka, a chain can eat multiple cores if it needs more throughput. This is called Elastic scaling. With JAM and Elastic scaling, blocks can actually be split into chunks and validated in parallel, allowing the network’s parallel processing to directly impact single-state throughput. Reminder that this Elastic scaling is already live on Kusama and will be coming to Polkadot next quarter. Now, Justin Bons and @0xBreadguy argue that any sharded system can claim millions of TPS, but that doesn’t mean anything as it doesn’t happen within a single state—not equivalent to atomic composability. So, for this time, I’m tossing it to the gigabrains. Do they have a point, or is there more to consider. Shawn Tabrizi Gavin Wood rphmeier
1:46

Polkadot ran a major stress test, Spammening, in December 2024 to prove its infra can handle extreme txn loads in a live environment with real economic stakes. The result was 143K TPS, using just 23% of the network’s capacity. But the elephant in the room—does anyone outside of Polkadot even care. TPS is a tricky metric, especially today. Polkadot is a heterogeneous sharded blockchain and was used to be referred as layer 0. Essentially designed to orchestrate multiple chains in parallel, not maximize base layer txns. Therefore fundamentally it isn’t built for single-chain TPS races, but for very high throughput across multiple chains. So Polkadot’s TPS doesn’t compare neatly to monolithic chains, and that led to it staying out of TPS-focused optics in the past. As a result, it’s often misunderstood or seen as slow by this metric. And today, Polkadot has shifted from a chain-centric approach to a blockspace-centric one. It’s no longer about chains but about blockspace and cores—operating much like your multi-core computer. Aka, a chain can eat multiple cores if it needs more throughput. This is called Elastic scaling. With JAM and Elastic scaling, blocks can actually be split into chunks and validated in parallel, allowing the network’s parallel processing to directly impact single-state throughput. Reminder that this Elastic scaling is already live on Kusama and will be coming to Polkadot next quarter. Now, Justin Bons and @0xBreadguy argue that any sharded system can claim millions of TPS, but that doesn’t mean anything as it doesn’t happen within a single state—not equivalent to atomic composability. So, for this time, I’m tossing it to the gigabrains. Do they have a point, or is there more to consider. Shawn Tabrizi Gavin Wood rphmeier

goku

16,687 просмотров • 1 год назад

ELON: I’M SPENDING MANY BRAIN CYCLES ON SCALING OPTIMUS PRODUCTION “We're finalizing the design of Optimus version 3. That really is going to be a very remarkable robot. It will have essentially the manual dexterity of a human, meaning a very complex hand, an AI mind that can navigate and comprehend reality, and it will be made in very high volume. If you see any other robotics company, they're missing those three things. Those are the three really hard things. I spend actually at this point more of my mental cycles than anything else, any other single thing, on Optimus. That's solving for real-world AI. There is no supply chain that exists for humanoid robots, so we have to recreate it from scratch, which requires doing a lot of vertical integration.” Source: Interview at the All-In Summit, September 10, 2025
0:55

ELON: I’M SPENDING MANY BRAIN CYCLES ON SCALING OPTIMUS PRODUCTION “We're finalizing the design of Optimus version 3. That really is going to be a very remarkable robot. It will have essentially the manual dexterity of a human, meaning a very complex hand, an AI mind that can navigate and comprehend reality, and it will be made in very high volume. If you see any other robotics company, they're missing those three things. Those are the three really hard things. I spend actually at this point more of my mental cycles than anything else, any other single thing, on Optimus. That's solving for real-world AI. There is no supply chain that exists for humanoid robots, so we have to recreate it from scratch, which requires doing a lot of vertical integration.” Source: Interview at the All-In Summit, September 10, 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,534,607 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Phillip: It's also a reaction that people have to knowing that if they have an interaction with ice, whether or not they are legal, whether they are a citizen, they might have their freedom stripped from them. Do you acknowledge that that is happening? Trover: I acknowledge that it happens every day in this country when somebody who has committed a crime or doesn't runs from the police, what are they going to do? Yes, you're going to be in trouble. Phillip: We’re talking about people who have not committed crimes. Trover: That’s my point. Why would they run if they have not committed crimes?
0:47

Phillip: It's also a reaction that people have to knowing that if they have an interaction with ice, whether or not they are legal, whether they are a citizen, they might have their freedom stripped from them. Do you acknowledge that that is happening? Trover: I acknowledge that it happens every day in this country when somebody who has committed a crime or doesn't runs from the police, what are they going to do? Yes, you're going to be in trouble. Phillip: We’re talking about people who have not committed crimes. Trover: That’s my point. Why would they run if they have not committed crimes?

Acyn

64,448 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 MATT WALSH & TUCKER: "WHEN YOU GO TO WALMART, YOU NOTICE IT LOOKS A LOT DIFFERENT NOW" Walsh and Tucker discussed demographic changes they've observed in middle America, noting shifts in racial composition at everyday locations like Walmart and DMVs: Walsh: "If you have never been in a Walmart, that's America. That's middle America. When you go to places where everybody goes, Walmart is one of those places, you do notice things. It looks a lot different now. Not nearly as many white people as there used to be." Tucker: "You drive into middle America. There are no, I don't know what happened to all the whites. That's the biggest change. That's an incredibly fast change. Not an accidental change, was an intentional change to reduce the white population in the United States. Are we getting to a point where we can say that and notice it?" They're saying the quiet part out loud. America's demographics shifted faster in the past 30 years than any period in history outside of war or conquest. You're allowed to notice that. Source: TCN Matt Walsh
2:21

🚨🇺🇸 MATT WALSH & TUCKER: "WHEN YOU GO TO WALMART, YOU NOTICE IT LOOKS A LOT DIFFERENT NOW" Walsh and Tucker discussed demographic changes they've observed in middle America, noting shifts in racial composition at everyday locations like Walmart and DMVs: Walsh: "If you have never been in a Walmart, that's America. That's middle America. When you go to places where everybody goes, Walmart is one of those places, you do notice things. It looks a lot different now. Not nearly as many white people as there used to be." Tucker: "You drive into middle America. There are no, I don't know what happened to all the whites. That's the biggest change. That's an incredibly fast change. Not an accidental change, was an intentional change to reduce the white population in the United States. Are we getting to a point where we can say that and notice it?" They're saying the quiet part out loud. America's demographics shifted faster in the past 30 years than any period in history outside of war or conquest. You're allowed to notice that. Source: TCN Matt Walsh

Mario Nawfal

222,436 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

FLERFs have clipped a Brian Cox segment from Joe Rogan and - as usual - had to surgically remove the context to make it work. Gotta Lie To Flerf. The clip they're pushing shows Cox saying there's no experiment you can do on Earth to detect its motion. What they don't show is everything before it: Cox is specifically talking about detecting Earth's *orbit around the Sun*. That part's actually correct - Einstein and Hawking both concluded there's no *local* experiment that can distinguish being at rest from moving in a straight line through space. There is no absolute space. That's the point. None of that has anything to do with Earth's *rotation*. Because here's the thing: we can prove Earth rotates. Foucault's pendulum has been doing it since 1851. We watch Earth spin in real time with satellites. The Coriolis effect shapes weather systems across entire hemispheres. These aren't theoretical - they're observable, measurable, repeatable. Even if the quote meant what the FLERFs claim it means (it doesn't), it *still* wouldn't prove Earth doesn't rotate. That's how badly this fails on every level. Full clip attached so you can see the actual context. Gotta Lie to FLERF. 🌍
3:02

FLERFs have clipped a Brian Cox segment from Joe Rogan and - as usual - had to surgically remove the context to make it work. Gotta Lie To Flerf. The clip they're pushing shows Cox saying there's no experiment you can do on Earth to detect its motion. What they don't show is everything before it: Cox is specifically talking about detecting Earth's *orbit around the Sun*. That part's actually correct - Einstein and Hawking both concluded there's no *local* experiment that can distinguish being at rest from moving in a straight line through space. There is no absolute space. That's the point. None of that has anything to do with Earth's *rotation*. Because here's the thing: we can prove Earth rotates. Foucault's pendulum has been doing it since 1851. We watch Earth spin in real time with satellites. The Coriolis effect shapes weather systems across entire hemispheres. These aren't theoretical - they're observable, measurable, repeatable. Even if the quote meant what the FLERFs claim it means (it doesn't), it *still* wouldn't prove Earth doesn't rotate. That's how badly this fails on every level. Full clip attached so you can see the actual context. Gotta Lie to FLERF. 🌍

Alex Boge

24,568 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A single neuron is not a brain. A brain is what happens when specialized regions, each trained differently, each doing different things - communicate, synchronize, and produce something none of them could do alone. That's what MultiNX is. Qubic's latest release lets you connect multiple Neuraxon AI units into a network, control how information flows between them in real time, and watch emergent behavior appear at the system level. Not one AI. A network of AIs. Each specialized. Each talking to the others. The demo runs in your browser. The code is fully open source. If you're a researcher, a developer, or anyone who thinks decentralized AI deserves more attention… explore it, build with it, and drop a star on GitHub. Every star helps this reach the people who should be paying attention. ⭐
10:51

A single neuron is not a brain. A brain is what happens when specialized regions, each trained differently, each doing different things - communicate, synchronize, and produce something none of them could do alone. That's what MultiNX is. Qubic's latest release lets you connect multiple Neuraxon AI units into a network, control how information flows between them in real time, and watch emergent behavior appear at the system level. Not one AI. A network of AIs. Each specialized. Each talking to the others. The demo runs in your browser. The code is fully open source. If you're a researcher, a developer, or anyone who thinks decentralized AI deserves more attention… explore it, build with it, and drop a star on GitHub. Every star helps this reach the people who should be paying attention. ⭐

Qubic

30,766 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

In our last conversation, Gavin said data centers in space will be the most important thing in 3-4 years. He explains that means "racks in space" and thinks orbital compute will solve the watts shortage: "When people hear data centers in space, they picture a Pentagon-sized building in space. That's not what it is. A Blackwell rack weighs 3,000 pounds. It's eight feet high. Four feet deep. Three feet wide. It's racks in space. It has these solar wings that are probably 500 feet long on each side. You keep it in a Sun-synchronous orbit, so those solar panels are always in the sun. And then because it's in an exactly Sun-synchronous orbit, the radiator, which extends behind it for hundreds of feet is in the shade. You link these racks using lasers traveling through vacuum which are already on every Starlink. SpaceX operates the world's largest satellite fleet, which is 98 or 99% of all satellites in orbit. Every Starlink, they're cooling it today. I think Starlink V3 is going to operate at 20 kilowatts. A Blackwell rack is only 100 kilowatts. And people talk a lot about density. Well, if you're connecting the racks with lasers through vacuum, you can make the rack bigger physically. In space, there's all sorts of things that SpaceX can do. They also now operate the largest data center on Earth. I've spent a lot of time at Starbase over the years, and I've talked to a lot of SpaceX engineers. It is the most talented group of engineers on planet Earth, and they're very confident they have solved this."
2:30

In our last conversation, Gavin said data centers in space will be the most important thing in 3-4 years. He explains that means "racks in space" and thinks orbital compute will solve the watts shortage: "When people hear data centers in space, they picture a Pentagon-sized building in space. That's not what it is. A Blackwell rack weighs 3,000 pounds. It's eight feet high. Four feet deep. Three feet wide. It's racks in space. It has these solar wings that are probably 500 feet long on each side. You keep it in a Sun-synchronous orbit, so those solar panels are always in the sun. And then because it's in an exactly Sun-synchronous orbit, the radiator, which extends behind it for hundreds of feet is in the shade. You link these racks using lasers traveling through vacuum which are already on every Starlink. SpaceX operates the world's largest satellite fleet, which is 98 or 99% of all satellites in orbit. Every Starlink, they're cooling it today. I think Starlink V3 is going to operate at 20 kilowatts. A Blackwell rack is only 100 kilowatts. And people talk a lot about density. Well, if you're connecting the racks with lasers through vacuum, you can make the rack bigger physically. In space, there's all sorts of things that SpaceX can do. They also now operate the largest data center on Earth. I've spent a lot of time at Starbase over the years, and I've talked to a lot of SpaceX engineers. It is the most talented group of engineers on planet Earth, and they're very confident they have solved this."

Patrick OShaughnessy

267,946 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ohio woman Bionca Ellis has been sentenced to life without parole for the murder of 3-year-old Julian Wood in a random stabbing attack in a grocery store parking lot. Julian's mother Margot gave a DEVASTATING victim statement: "That woman murdering my son replays in my head every single day. It is my living nightmare." "I watched him take his first breath when he was born and his last when he died in my arms, covered in blood." "The last thing I will ever hear from my son is his scream and the sound of his pain and fear before he was gone. I can still see the terror in his eyes, and it haunts me every day." "I hate you with every fiber of my being." "Just because you have a mental illness doesn't mean you can use that to justify the murder of my son. What you did was unforgivable." "You don't deserve a second chance. You don't deserve mercy; you didn't give my son any."
2:04

Ohio woman Bionca Ellis has been sentenced to life without parole for the murder of 3-year-old Julian Wood in a random stabbing attack in a grocery store parking lot. Julian's mother Margot gave a DEVASTATING victim statement: "That woman murdering my son replays in my head every single day. It is my living nightmare." "I watched him take his first breath when he was born and his last when he died in my arms, covered in blood." "The last thing I will ever hear from my son is his scream and the sound of his pain and fear before he was gone. I can still see the terror in his eyes, and it haunts me every day." "I hate you with every fiber of my being." "Just because you have a mental illness doesn't mean you can use that to justify the murder of my son. What you did was unforgivable." "You don't deserve a second chance. You don't deserve mercy; you didn't give my son any."

Breitbart News

108,447 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Every time I hear the debate between English identity and multiculturalism, I’m deeply confused. Multiculturalism essentially means that “Englishness” is an empty vessel in which cultures live together, that the vessel of being a country is neutral and empty of content. There’s been an elite project in Britain, America and Canada and generally in the English speaking world, to empty identity of distinctiveness and culture and into that empty vessel, pour any old random thing. Literally any old idea unexamined. And so you now have in Britain, a very small minority of radical islamists. They are tiny. Most muslims are not radical. They are tiny, and yet they can run your streets because everybody else is an empty vessel. You look at that idea and you say that’s not me, that’s not us, and you spit it out. But if you don’t know what me and us is, you can’t look at an idea and say that’s not us. One of the most precious things you could give your children is a thousand years of culture. It’s who you are and who you have been. Now I’m an Israeli Jew who firmly believes a nation can be multiracial but I’m worried about multicultural. Because culture is the single most important decider of human behavior. It’s the single most important thing to have in a cohesive country. To Westerners who have been trained by generations of elites to not know who you are because of a misunderstanding of what happened in the 20th century, because of a misunderstanding of where colonialism and WWII comes from, as thinking too much about your own culture, or thinking your culture is too good, is what caused the Holocaust, you need to step back. “Germaness” is not what caused the Holocaust - Haviv Rettig Gur nails it. Every word of this
3:54

Every time I hear the debate between English identity and multiculturalism, I’m deeply confused. Multiculturalism essentially means that “Englishness” is an empty vessel in which cultures live together, that the vessel of being a country is neutral and empty of content. There’s been an elite project in Britain, America and Canada and generally in the English speaking world, to empty identity of distinctiveness and culture and into that empty vessel, pour any old random thing. Literally any old idea unexamined. And so you now have in Britain, a very small minority of radical islamists. They are tiny. Most muslims are not radical. They are tiny, and yet they can run your streets because everybody else is an empty vessel. You look at that idea and you say that’s not me, that’s not us, and you spit it out. But if you don’t know what me and us is, you can’t look at an idea and say that’s not us. One of the most precious things you could give your children is a thousand years of culture. It’s who you are and who you have been. Now I’m an Israeli Jew who firmly believes a nation can be multiracial but I’m worried about multicultural. Because culture is the single most important decider of human behavior. It’s the single most important thing to have in a cohesive country. To Westerners who have been trained by generations of elites to not know who you are because of a misunderstanding of what happened in the 20th century, because of a misunderstanding of where colonialism and WWII comes from, as thinking too much about your own culture, or thinking your culture is too good, is what caused the Holocaust, you need to step back. “Germaness” is not what caused the Holocaust - Haviv Rettig Gur nails it. Every word of this

Melissa Chen

245,583 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

People often buy because they love the story. We're buying stories not products. These are sunglasses, but they're not made from plastic or metal. They're made from something that you can get paid to take. Not something that you pay for, something that you get paid to take for free. And the more you think about it, the more genius it becomes. How many coffee shops are there in the world? Over 100,000. What percentage of them throw away their coffee grounds every day? Like 98%. It's just a waste. It goes in the landfills. Nobody wants it. But someone looked at that waste and thought, what if that's not waste? What if this is raw material? And that change in perspective changes everything. Now you've got a product that costs you nothing to source. It's called a negative COGS business (cost of goods sold). A negative COGS business is where you actually get paid to take the material you make your product out of. A company called Eco Scraps did this in Utah. They got paid to take old produce from grocery stores and they turned it into luxury compost that they sold at Home Depot for nine bucks a bag instead of three bucks a bag. These guys are doing the same thing with coffee grounds but they're turning it into sunglasses of all things. Brilliant story. Brilliant execution. I freaking love this stuff.
1:05

People often buy because they love the story. We're buying stories not products. These are sunglasses, but they're not made from plastic or metal. They're made from something that you can get paid to take. Not something that you pay for, something that you get paid to take for free. And the more you think about it, the more genius it becomes. How many coffee shops are there in the world? Over 100,000. What percentage of them throw away their coffee grounds every day? Like 98%. It's just a waste. It goes in the landfills. Nobody wants it. But someone looked at that waste and thought, what if that's not waste? What if this is raw material? And that change in perspective changes everything. Now you've got a product that costs you nothing to source. It's called a negative COGS business (cost of goods sold). A negative COGS business is where you actually get paid to take the material you make your product out of. A company called Eco Scraps did this in Utah. They got paid to take old produce from grocery stores and they turned it into luxury compost that they sold at Home Depot for nine bucks a bag instead of three bucks a bag. These guys are doing the same thing with coffee grounds but they're turning it into sunglasses of all things. Brilliant story. Brilliant execution. I freaking love this stuff.

Chris Koerner

12,393 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein
2:10

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,337 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

WOW. 😳 Apple just quietly won the 3D maps war at WWDC. Gaussian Splatting is coming to Apple Maps Flyover this fall. Apple Maps Flyover covers 300+ cities. Until yesterday, every single one was built on standard drone photogrammetry. The technology captures photos from the air and reconstructs 3D geometry from them. Gaussian Splatting does not reconstruct geometry. It represents the scene as millions of tiny 3D ellipsoids, each one carrying its own color and opacity information based on how light actually behaves in that location. The output is not a mesh model. It is a field of light. When you move through it, it does not crumble at the edges. The detail holds because it was never geometry to begin with. Apple has been hiring for this for years. Their SHARP model, published in research last year, generates photorealistic 3D scenes from a single image in under a second. Google has more sensor data than anyone. More Street View cars, more satellites, more capture history. On navigation accuracy and geodata depth, Google Maps is still ahead by most measures. But fidelity in 3D city rendering is a different competition, and Apple just set a bar in that. Most people will experience this in the fall without knowing the name of the technology. They will open Flyover, look at a city they know, and notice it looks different. Real, not rendered. That is the moment Gaussian Splatting stops being a research term and becomes something a billion people use. Bookmark this. It will look prescient by October.
0:24

WOW. 😳 Apple just quietly won the 3D maps war at WWDC. Gaussian Splatting is coming to Apple Maps Flyover this fall. Apple Maps Flyover covers 300+ cities. Until yesterday, every single one was built on standard drone photogrammetry. The technology captures photos from the air and reconstructs 3D geometry from them. Gaussian Splatting does not reconstruct geometry. It represents the scene as millions of tiny 3D ellipsoids, each one carrying its own color and opacity information based on how light actually behaves in that location. The output is not a mesh model. It is a field of light. When you move through it, it does not crumble at the edges. The detail holds because it was never geometry to begin with. Apple has been hiring for this for years. Their SHARP model, published in research last year, generates photorealistic 3D scenes from a single image in under a second. Google has more sensor data than anyone. More Street View cars, more satellites, more capture history. On navigation accuracy and geodata depth, Google Maps is still ahead by most measures. But fidelity in 3D city rendering is a different competition, and Apple just set a bar in that. Most people will experience this in the fall without knowing the name of the technology. They will open Flyover, look at a city they know, and notice it looks different. Real, not rendered. That is the moment Gaussian Splatting stops being a research term and becomes something a billion people use. Bookmark this. It will look prescient by October.

Shruti

19,832 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Following the Money: How Power Builds a Parallel Reality There is a moment in this discussion between Danny Jones and Catherine Austin where everything snaps into focus and not because of UFOs, or secret bases, or exotic technology, but because of money. If you want to understand how reality is shaped, you do not argue ideology or belief systems all you got to do is track where the hours go, where the money goes. Everything is tied up in this shit show, from education, media, intelligence and surveillance, even behavioral nudging. This is where the largest investments are being made, and not to discover truth, the aim is to manage perception. What's described is a system designed to manufacture consensus, or more accurately, to fragment it. Overt media, covert media, subliminal entrainment, algorithmic feedback loops, you name it. We, the people are not just informed, we are steered, and fed narratives whilst being distracted by entertainment, sex, sports, outrage. The goal is not persuasion in the old sense it's conditioning. Conditioned to ignore what you may ask? Well budgets that do not match the stories being told for a start. When you actually sit inside the machinery of government finance and watch the numbers move in real time, the public narrative collapses big time. What is debated on television has literally nothing to do with what is actually happening in the ledger. Ok so I covered the idea of a breakaway civilization earlier today, but this is where the idea stops sounding speculative and starts sounding realistic. Trillions in undocumented adjustments resulting in money vanishing from official accounts while offshore pools balloon. Black budgets expanding alongside invisible infrastructure funding underground facilitiesand classified technology. Is this a parallel governance mechanism being built in the background over decades? The suggestion is not that one single project absorbed it all, that would be crazy. It is that an entire alternative system was financed in parallel while the old one was kept running just long enough to manage the transition. We could be talking new physics, propulsion, surveillance, weapons or control structures. The type of spending that never appears in public budgets. When people ask where the money went,well that's where creative accounting comes in. If enough money disappears to fund a global government on an endowment basis, then something very real was built. These things don't just happen overnight they are built up gradually behind layers of secrecy and distraction. The most f*cked part of all this, is that its not chaos as they would have you believe. This is organization not incompetence, this all by design. You do not accidentally persuade an entire civilization to argue about shadows while the infrastructure of power relocates right beneath their feet. If you want to understand reality, stop arguing narratives. Follow the time and follow the money because it never lies. #BreakawayCivilization #BlackBudget #FollowTheMoney #ManufacturedReality #PowerStructures #HiddenInfrastructure Source: Clip Courtesy Of Danny Jones, watch the full interview here:
5:04

🚨Following the Money: How Power Builds a Parallel Reality There is a moment in this discussion between Danny Jones and Catherine Austin where everything snaps into focus and not because of UFOs, or secret bases, or exotic technology, but because of money. If you want to understand how reality is shaped, you do not argue ideology or belief systems all you got to do is track where the hours go, where the money goes. Everything is tied up in this shit show, from education, media, intelligence and surveillance, even behavioral nudging. This is where the largest investments are being made, and not to discover truth, the aim is to manage perception. What's described is a system designed to manufacture consensus, or more accurately, to fragment it. Overt media, covert media, subliminal entrainment, algorithmic feedback loops, you name it. We, the people are not just informed, we are steered, and fed narratives whilst being distracted by entertainment, sex, sports, outrage. The goal is not persuasion in the old sense it's conditioning. Conditioned to ignore what you may ask? Well budgets that do not match the stories being told for a start. When you actually sit inside the machinery of government finance and watch the numbers move in real time, the public narrative collapses big time. What is debated on television has literally nothing to do with what is actually happening in the ledger. Ok so I covered the idea of a breakaway civilization earlier today, but this is where the idea stops sounding speculative and starts sounding realistic. Trillions in undocumented adjustments resulting in money vanishing from official accounts while offshore pools balloon. Black budgets expanding alongside invisible infrastructure funding underground facilitiesand classified technology. Is this a parallel governance mechanism being built in the background over decades? The suggestion is not that one single project absorbed it all, that would be crazy. It is that an entire alternative system was financed in parallel while the old one was kept running just long enough to manage the transition. We could be talking new physics, propulsion, surveillance, weapons or control structures. The type of spending that never appears in public budgets. When people ask where the money went,well that's where creative accounting comes in. If enough money disappears to fund a global government on an endowment basis, then something very real was built. These things don't just happen overnight they are built up gradually behind layers of secrecy and distraction. The most f*cked part of all this, is that its not chaos as they would have you believe. This is organization not incompetence, this all by design. You do not accidentally persuade an entire civilization to argue about shadows while the infrastructure of power relocates right beneath their feet. If you want to understand reality, stop arguing narratives. Follow the time and follow the money because it never lies. #BreakawayCivilization #BlackBudget #FollowTheMoney #ManufacturedReality #PowerStructures #HiddenInfrastructure Source: Clip Courtesy Of Danny Jones, watch the full interview here:

Skywatch Signal

37,870 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This is only the beginning. 🔊 Sound On What does it mean to explore a house built from memory — one that feels familiar, yet shifts each time you return? That question is at the heart of Memory House, a project that unfolds through space, silence, and surreal interruption. Grateful to the World Labs team for making this experiment possible — their latest tool Marble opens up a new way of building. With Gaussian splatting, a single 2D image becomes a 3D space you can step inside. From there, entire environments can grow by stitching rooms together, layering ambience, proximity, and subtle triggers for immersion. The teaser captures just the start of an exploration in narrative: waking up in bed, following the quiet sounds of home, and stepping into a kitchen where reality begins to fracture. But that’s only one fragment of a project now expanding into 30+ connected rooms. With Worldlabs, alongside tools like Veo3 and ElevenLabs, Memory House is evolving into a new form of storytelling — where memory isn’t told on a page, but experienced through space.
1:18

This is only the beginning. 🔊 Sound On What does it mean to explore a house built from memory — one that feels familiar, yet shifts each time you return? That question is at the heart of Memory House, a project that unfolds through space, silence, and surreal interruption. Grateful to the World Labs team for making this experiment possible — their latest tool Marble opens up a new way of building. With Gaussian splatting, a single 2D image becomes a 3D space you can step inside. From there, entire environments can grow by stitching rooms together, layering ambience, proximity, and subtle triggers for immersion. The teaser captures just the start of an exploration in narrative: waking up in bed, following the quiet sounds of home, and stepping into a kitchen where reality begins to fracture. But that’s only one fragment of a project now expanding into 30+ connected rooms. With Worldlabs, alongside tools like Veo3 and ElevenLabs, Memory House is evolving into a new form of storytelling — where memory isn’t told on a page, but experienced through space.

The Artist's Journey

19,085 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

playing vayne is like a drug the first time you condemn someone into a wall and watch them explode you feel something no other champion in this game can give you and you spend the next 5 years chasing that feeling every single game first game you go 0/7. you tumble INTO the enemy. you condemn someone AWAY from the wall. you're fucking terrible. any normal person would uninstall. but then game 2 something happens you're losing lane. down 30 cs. support abandoned you. 1 item at 22 minutes. a dragon fight breaks out and you come in a bit late. you ult. tumble sideways. dodge a couple abilities. output some auto attacks and land a nasty condemn. triple kill. entire team pinging you. your hands are shaking. THAT'S the hit. three kills in a losing game and your brain is rewired PERMANENTLY you will spend the next thousands of games chasing that exact feeling. you will go 0/5 in lane and lock her in again. you will play into counters. into hard matchups. into unwinnable lanes. doesn't matter. you're not here for laning phase. you're here for the MOMENT. 3 items. teamfight breaks out. you walk in and the entire enemy team scatters like cockroaches. YOU are the raid boss now. 5 years deep and that rush hasn't worn off ONCE. every condemn into a perfect angle. every tumble through an ability that should've killed you. every invisible reposition they didn't see coming. no other champion does this. no other champion even comes CLOSE. that's why vayne mains never switch. it's not loyalty. it's not stubbornness. it's addiction. Study the Saskio way
0:32

playing vayne is like a drug the first time you condemn someone into a wall and watch them explode you feel something no other champion in this game can give you and you spend the next 5 years chasing that feeling every single game first game you go 0/7. you tumble INTO the enemy. you condemn someone AWAY from the wall. you're fucking terrible. any normal person would uninstall. but then game 2 something happens you're losing lane. down 30 cs. support abandoned you. 1 item at 22 minutes. a dragon fight breaks out and you come in a bit late. you ult. tumble sideways. dodge a couple abilities. output some auto attacks and land a nasty condemn. triple kill. entire team pinging you. your hands are shaking. THAT'S the hit. three kills in a losing game and your brain is rewired PERMANENTLY you will spend the next thousands of games chasing that exact feeling. you will go 0/5 in lane and lock her in again. you will play into counters. into hard matchups. into unwinnable lanes. doesn't matter. you're not here for laning phase. you're here for the MOMENT. 3 items. teamfight breaks out. you walk in and the entire enemy team scatters like cockroaches. YOU are the raid boss now. 5 years deep and that rush hasn't worn off ONCE. every condemn into a perfect angle. every tumble through an ability that should've killed you. every invisible reposition they didn't see coming. no other champion does this. no other champion even comes CLOSE. that's why vayne mains never switch. it's not loyalty. it's not stubbornness. it's addiction. Study the Saskio way

Tony Chau

81,327 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The biggest misconception about carnivore is that it's expensive. It's not. That's a myth. Yes, if you're eating ribeyes twice a day, you're going to spend a lot of money. But carnivore is not ribeyes twice a day for most of us. That's not reality and it's not what I teach. Here's my reality in Houston right now: When chuck roast goes on sale I buy as much as I can. It regularly comes out to about $2 a serving. Ground beef is my main staple and I pay around $5 a pound, which gives me two meals. Eggs and butter round out almost everything I eat. Most days I spend around $6 total. Sometimes less. The meal in this video is a crustless quiche and Market Side hot dogs. Total cost: about $4. Carnivore does not have to mean steak twice a day. It means working with real animal food at whatever price point you can find it that week. Chuck roast. Ground beef. Eggs. Butter. Hot dogs when that's what fits the budget. That is the whole point of what I do. Carnivore is not exclusive to people with money. It is not exclusive to people with farms nearby or neighbors with chickens or access to fancy butchers. The majority of us don't have any of that. I don't either. Anyone can do this. That is my message and I mean it every single time I say it.👑
0:47

The biggest misconception about carnivore is that it's expensive. It's not. That's a myth. Yes, if you're eating ribeyes twice a day, you're going to spend a lot of money. But carnivore is not ribeyes twice a day for most of us. That's not reality and it's not what I teach. Here's my reality in Houston right now: When chuck roast goes on sale I buy as much as I can. It regularly comes out to about $2 a serving. Ground beef is my main staple and I pay around $5 a pound, which gives me two meals. Eggs and butter round out almost everything I eat. Most days I spend around $6 total. Sometimes less. The meal in this video is a crustless quiche and Market Side hot dogs. Total cost: about $4. Carnivore does not have to mean steak twice a day. It means working with real animal food at whatever price point you can find it that week. Chuck roast. Ground beef. Eggs. Butter. Hot dogs when that's what fits the budget. That is the whole point of what I do. Carnivore is not exclusive to people with money. It is not exclusive to people with farms nearby or neighbors with chickens or access to fancy butchers. The majority of us don't have any of that. I don't either. Anyone can do this. That is my message and I mean it every single time I say it.👑

Queen of Carni

10,733 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

💬: Do we have anyone in mind? Who should come learn from you (Seme- Uke school 😭)? 🐯: They've actually been developing quite a bit already. 🐶: Those two spend a lot of time together, yeah. 🐯: They're together all the time. GemFot these days.. there are hugs, there are embraces. 🐯: And recently, recently, recently!! 🐯 : there were flowers given after fot screening day. I was like, oh my god.. im deaddd (shipper mode). 💬: Did you ever think nong would one day be holding flowers? 🐯: No, no, never. Oh wow, after two or three years, I never imagined it. 🐶: It means... 🐯🐶: It means they like each other. 😂 💬: what about santa? 🐶: Actually, everyone has been developing lately. Even Phuwin has started becoming prettier. 🐯: That's true. Let me say this first. I want to say it before anyone else. 🐶: Oh? What is it? 🐯: If Phu comes and kisses us, we don't have a problem with it. But when it comes to Pond, that's not allowed. 🐶: twists from embarrassment~ 🐯: What does that mean, Tata? 🐯🐶: It means they like each other 😂 // PPW AND GF this is your turn to get revenge naaaa!! 😭😭 PSD DEVILLAIN LAUNCH OPPO #Reno16SeriesTHxPerthSantaDOMIIA
1:19

💬: Do we have anyone in mind? Who should come learn from you (Seme- Uke school 😭)? 🐯: They've actually been developing quite a bit already. 🐶: Those two spend a lot of time together, yeah. 🐯: They're together all the time. GemFot these days.. there are hugs, there are embraces. 🐯: And recently, recently, recently!! 🐯 : there were flowers given after fot screening day. I was like, oh my god.. im deaddd (shipper mode). 💬: Did you ever think nong would one day be holding flowers? 🐯: No, no, never. Oh wow, after two or three years, I never imagined it. 🐶: It means... 🐯🐶: It means they like each other. 😂 💬: what about santa? 🐶: Actually, everyone has been developing lately. Even Phuwin has started becoming prettier. 🐯: That's true. Let me say this first. I want to say it before anyone else. 🐶: Oh? What is it? 🐯: If Phu comes and kisses us, we don't have a problem with it. But when it comes to Pond, that's not allowed. 🐶: twists from embarrassment~ 🐯: What does that mean, Tata? 🐯🐶: It means they like each other 😂 // PPW AND GF this is your turn to get revenge naaaa!! 😭😭 PSD DEVILLAIN LAUNCH OPPO #Reno16SeriesTHxPerthSantaDOMIIA

chuchu🐼♡

30,121 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.
0:49

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Dustin

9,668,897 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад