Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Every peace treaty in history was based on compromise, not absolute justice. Justice is essential, but the pursuit of absolute justice can lead you to perpetuate conflict indefinitely, never reaching peace. Full Piers Morgan interview for Piers Morgan Uncensored:

1,349,632 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Handala's profile picture
Handala2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored "There's a difference between peace and liberation, is there not? You can have injustice and have peace, isn't that correct? You can have peace and be enslaved. So peace is not the answer, liberation is the answer."

د. حسن هاشم's profile picture
د. حسن هاشم2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored Your question is Israel has the right to defend itself ??. No of course. It is like a gang that steals a bank and kills the guard and some customers. Do they have the right to defend themselves against the police?

Jacques Joubert's profile picture
Jacques Joubert2 years ago

A peace treaty is a step towards peace and not a one off event - the hard work for justice begins afterwards. To frame a peace treaty as simply a compromise can fuel the conflict. The world has much to learn from South Africa, even if the hard work for justice has been undermined by state capture and corruption.

Ad's profile picture
Ad2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored Is this the compromise you talking about? 👇 or is it the compromise to deny those who has been ethnically cleansed by terror and genocide their right to return ?

haroon rafique's profile picture
haroon rafique2 years ago

Yuval, you taint the essence of truth by implying that Jews in Palestine originated from Muslim lands. Instead, we must acknowledge the stark history where persecuted Jews of Europe, distinct racially from Arab Jews, were transported by the British to Palestine. Their population swelled to nearly 400,000, well before the Nakba, the grievous tragedy that befell the Palestinians in 1948 when their land was usurped, due to the actions of acknowledged avowed Zionist terror groups. The British, recognizing the challenges of the situation and objections of the indigenous people, attempted to curtail the Jewish population to 75,000 within a five-year period. However, the onset of World War II and the atrocities perpetrated by Hitler disrupted the British plans. This coerced migration of Jews into Palestine is, in essence, a European response to their own widespread centuries rejection of Jewry, as even scholarly literature reflects. We can draw a parallel to the current border crisis in America, where a surge of unchecked 2m annual migrants arrives through Mexico. It is imperative to consider how the American people perceive this situation. Much like Trump associated immigrants with terrorism, so too did the Palestinian people link Zionist immigrants with acts of terrorism. These parallels in history and contemporary events invite us to reflect and not to distort realties or fabricate new ones.

Alexej Jerschow's profile picture
Alexej Jerschow2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored Yuval is the best!!!

Mohamed (Mo Around the World)'s profile picture
Mohamed (Mo Around the World)2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored You had some good points, but you said your not an expert on how to evacuate the civilians, which i agree with, but your an export on terrorism? With all that Israel has done (which you mentioned) they're still not a terrorist organization?

Usman Khaliq's profile picture
Usman Khaliq2 years ago

Absolutely, your point is poignant. The distinction between peace and liberation is crucial. While peace might temporarily coexist with injustice, true and lasting resolution requires liberation – the freedom from oppression and injustice. It's a nuanced perspective that emphasizes the need for comprehensive change for genuine harmony. #LiberationForLastingPeace

Arcady Volman's profile picture
Arcady Volman2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored Oh really? What about the peace treaty with Germany and with Japan after World War II?

Ralph Janík's profile picture
Ralph Janík2 years ago

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored That’s nonsense. Good historians shouldn’t make generalised claims like “every treaty in history” and I assume you haven’t read 2000s+ years of peace treaty practice. In addition to the Versailles elephant in the room example see also Bederman, International Law in Antiquity 👇🏻

Related Videos