Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"Every time Strategy wins, every time Strive wins, every time H100 wins, every time Smarter Web wins, Capital B wins because when you talk to fund managers all across the world, they need more issuers to allocate more capital." Director of Bitcoin Strategy at Capital B, Alexandre Laizet (Alexandre...

69,461 views • 19 days ago •via X (Twitter)

14 Comments

80's profile picture
8019 days ago

Alex is a genuinely awesome guy.

Yuki Eliot's profile picture
Yuki Eliot18 days ago

more public companies holding btc is bullish for everyone in the space

Ledger & Liquidity's profile picture
Ledger & Liquidity18 days ago

@saylor Bitcoin treasury companies are basically building more on-ramps for institutional capital. More vehicles, more buyers.

Hadrian's profile picture
Hadrian18 days ago

@asjwebley 💯 The market is still so small. When btc becomes popular again, all will moon.

The Daily Digits's profile picture
The Daily Digits18 days ago

wins together only if they're all buying at a premium to nav. strive's last buy was $79,444 avg against $78,077 spot, accretive. the ones issuing stock below nav are diluting holders while calling it a win.

2014MU69 - Arrokoth's profile picture
2014MU69 - Arrokoth18 days ago

@saylor Thought this was the Harry Potter kid

Uno Alpha's profile picture
Uno Alpha18 days ago

@saylor every time they win the thesis gets louder. the boring part is most people still don't know what they actually own

Homie's profile picture
Homie18 days ago

@saylor Thought that was Zuch quickly

vøv △'s profile picture
vøv △18 days ago

@saylor more issuers means more allocation, right?

Bitcoin Stylist's profile picture
Bitcoin Stylist18 days ago

1

.'s profile picture
.18 days ago

The only winner is XXI

Somewhere in the Middle's profile picture
Somewhere in the Middle18 days ago

the orange hair is a nice touch.

why's profile picture
why18 days ago

More issuers can give fund managers better choice, but differentiation will come down to execution, liquidity, and transparency.

ZeeSX BTC's profile picture
ZeeSX BTC18 days ago

Positive-sum if it brings more capital into BTC, not just shuffles it around.

Related Videos

Most people think about Bitcoin treasury companies incorrectly Here is why I think they are good for Bitcoin & why they are misunderstood: 1) Treasury companies are capitalizing the Bitcoin industry for a century to come 2) They are future Bitcoin Banks 3) However, they are developing in the reverse order compared to everything else - monetization first and then later on core business activities -- Bitcoin has traditionally received $1 for every $100 in funds that Crypto took in - it has historically been challenging to raise money for Bitcoin focused businesses. My view is that Treasury companies are changing this, and while the first phase will simply be acquiring as much Bitcoin as possible - they will later need to ensure the value of Bitcoin grows and find ways to use BTC as capital in a larger marketplace. These firms will become the future Bitcoin Banks and also Bitcoin conglomerates. In this exact moment in time the best use of capital is simply buying Bitcoin. It's hard to meaningfully outperform BTC, and as such all these businesses will do for a while is acquire BTC. But eventually that shifts, and these firms will see more incentive to both grow and deploy Bitcoin. They then will provide capital which, among other things, supports Bitcoin businesses and projects. Many people struggle to contextualize the current "land rush" phase with what will come later. You need to take a longer view to understand these firms. The order of operations is also reversed here. Typically you build a business or technology and then as a final step monetize it via an IPO. With Bitcoin, stage 1 is looking more like direct monetization prior to creating value via products, etc. This is deeply counter intuitive to many people in traditional finance, and also to many Bitcoiners. However, because Bitcoin is primarily money at a base level it makes sense the developmental path it is taking differs significantly from other tech. The amount of time it will take for other investors to understand this presents an opportunity for those who see it sooner. More thoughts below 👇

Steven Lubka ☀️

29,287 views • 1 year ago

🚨 MICHAEL SAYLOR IS ABOUT TO SELL BITCOIN 🚨 And it's much worse for the market than you think. Let me explain Saylor built the most aggressive Bitcoin accumulation machine in corporate history The model was simple: 1. Raise capital 2. Buy BTC 3. Reinvest returns 4. Repeat Every dip was a buy. Every week a new purchase. 5 years straight BUT Then Q1 2026 happened BTC dropped from 87k to 68k in three months. Strategy posted a $12.54B loss But even that's not the real problem Here's the real problem To fund the machine, Saylor issued STRC - preferred stock paying investors 11.5% annual dividend $8.5 billion raised - all of it went into BTC The catch - dividends don't stop when Bitcoin drops Strategy now owes investors $1.2 billion every single year. Regardless of price So yesterday Saylor admitted it publicly The man who screamed "never sell your Bitcoin" on every podcast - may now sell Bitcoin In isolation, selling to cover dividends isn't catastrophic But the narrative just broke And once the narrative breaks, the damage is structural Here's how it plays out Every time BTC drops and stays low - Strategy sells more BTC to cover the $1.2B obligation Every sale pushes price down Lower price means more BTC needed to cover the same obligation Which means more and more selling Strategy holds 818,000 BTC - 3.9% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist At current prices, covering annual dividends alone requires selling roughly 15,500 BTC per year That's not a number the market quietly absorbs For 5 years Saylor was the floor under every dip Now he's potentially the ceiling June 8 - shareholder vote on dividends. Watch that date BTC doesn't like forced sellers. It never has NOTIFS ON!

NoName

57,733 views • 4 months ago