Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Everyone obsesses over 21 million Bitcoin. But they memorized the wrong number: 4,000. That's roughly the max transactions in a block. 8 billion people. One transaction each. 60 years to clear the queue. The coin supply tells you the price potential Blockspace tells you who can afford to move... show more

Billy ₿oone

9,893 subscribers

23,921 views • 20 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨Bitcoin’s Catastrophic Problem NO ONE Is Talking About! Bitcoin produces 144 blocks per day. Fees are paid per block, every ~10 minutes. Yesterday, Bitcoin Layer-1 fees totaled ~2.6 BTC for the entire day. (Approx. $180K) That works out to ~0.018 $BTC per block. Meanwhile, the real cost to secure a block (electricity + hardware) is often $150k–$200k, depending on hash rate and energy prices. Today, miners survive because of the 3.125 $BTC block subsidy. Fees do not matter NOW, because the Bitcoin emissions are worth enough to offset costs. 🚨THE PROBLEM? When Bitcoin reaches 21 million supply, that subsidy goes to zero. At that point, fees must fully pay miners — or hash rate drops, security weakens, and the system degrades. To break even long-term, Bitcoin needs tens of millions per day in L1 fees. Yesterday was sub $200,000. I own Bitcoin. I want it to succeed. But pretending this isn’t a real issue won’t solve it.

🚨Bitcoin’s Catastrophic Problem NO ONE Is Talking About! Bitcoin produces 144 blocks per day. Fees are paid per block, every ~10 minutes. Yesterday, Bitcoin Layer-1 fees totaled ~2.6 BTC for the entire day. (Approx. $180K) That works out to ~0.018 $BTC per block. Meanwhile, the real cost to secure a block (electricity + hardware) is often $150k–$200k, depending on hash rate and energy prices. Today, miners survive because of the 3.125 $BTC block subsidy. Fees do not matter NOW, because the Bitcoin emissions are worth enough to offset costs. 🚨THE PROBLEM? When Bitcoin reaches 21 million supply, that subsidy goes to zero. At that point, fees must fully pay miners — or hash rate drops, security weakens, and the system degrades. To break even long-term, Bitcoin needs tens of millions per day in L1 fees. Yesterday was sub $200,000. I own Bitcoin. I want it to succeed. But pretending this isn’t a real issue won’t solve it.

Finance Freeman 🇺🇸

440,000 views • 6 months ago

NEW The Mining Pod W/ James McAvity: “Bitcoin could be a $20T asset with only scraps left for miners” ⚡ 40%+ of hashrate now in the US ⚡ Fees just 2% of miner revenue ⚡ 2036 halving = 90% less subsidy ⚡ Can BTC survive on fees alone? Brought to you by CleanSpark Inc.

NEW The Mining Pod W/ James McAvity: “Bitcoin could be a $20T asset with only scraps left for miners” ⚡ 40%+ of hashrate now in the US ⚡ Fees just 2% of miner revenue ⚡ 2036 halving = 90% less subsidy ⚡ Can BTC survive on fees alone? Brought to you by CleanSpark Inc.

Blockspace

14,306 views • 1 year ago

Blockchains are getting busier and cheaper while their tokens crash "There's a great report from Bitwise showing this strange phenomenon. Blockchain adoption is increasing massively, but the tokens are dumping to Hades. Eth, Sol and Avax each fell approximately 50% or more over the past year" "Ethereum transactions increased from 121 million to nearly 240 million, but revenue on that dropped 41%. That's because there's more blockspace now, it's become a commodity, and that's made transactions cheaper. So even on more transactions they're making far less money, which is actually very good for the consumer. Solana processed nearly record transaction volume while its network revenue declined, and Avalanche C-chain transactions roughly quadrupled to 236 million while revenue fell to approximately $330,000" "More transactions prove that people want the product, but they don't prove that the token captures the value, which has become a huge problem. The tokens are priced based on speculation from previous cycles, and even if their utility increases, maybe it doesn't justify the price they're trading at"

Blockchains are getting busier and cheaper while their tokens crash "There's a great report from Bitwise showing this strange phenomenon. Blockchain adoption is increasing massively, but the tokens are dumping to Hades. Eth, Sol and Avax each fell approximately 50% or more over the past year" "Ethereum transactions increased from 121 million to nearly 240 million, but revenue on that dropped 41%. That's because there's more blockspace now, it's become a commodity, and that's made transactions cheaper. So even on more transactions they're making far less money, which is actually very good for the consumer. Solana processed nearly record transaction volume while its network revenue declined, and Avalanche C-chain transactions roughly quadrupled to 236 million while revenue fell to approximately $330,000" "More transactions prove that people want the product, but they don't prove that the token captures the value, which has become a huge problem. The tokens are priced based on speculation from previous cycles, and even if their utility increases, maybe it doesn't justify the price they're trading at"

The Wolf Of All Streets

20,446 views • 1 month ago

"I used to be a bitcoiner. The transition to a new store of value only happens once every 3,000 years. That's the main prize -- just focus on that. But [security] is the criteria that ultimately convinced me to flip from Bitcoin to ETH." "I have a higher degree of certainty that Ethereum will be around longer [than Bitcoin]. The reason for that is because Bitcoin relies on proof-of-work, which is less efficient than proof-of-stake and doesn't scale with the value of the network. And as the block subsidy of Bitcoin halves every four years, it is increasingly becoming more and more reliant on transaction fees to fund the security budget paid to miners." "If you look at [Bitcoin's] security budget right now, about 0.6% of revenue to miners is transaction fees... The problem with that is if Bitcoin becomes 'digital gold', flips gold, and becomes a $30 trillion asset, but it only costs $10-20 billion to attack it, that's too asymmetric." "You want the security budget to scale with the market cap, similar to how countries spend a % of their GDP on defense. The more valuable something is, the more you need to spend to protect it." "Ethereum, with the Merge, migrated to proof-of-stake, which is fundamentally more secure because it's less reliant on transaction fees and it scales with the value of the network. If 1/3rd of ETH is staked and then you need 1/3rd of those ETH to censor the network, you're looking at roughly 10% of the total market cap as the cost to attack the network." "So if Ethereum flips Bitcoin and gold and becomes a $30 trillion asset, it'll cost ~$3 trillion to attack the Ethereum network versus Bitcoin at like $10 billion." "The other aspect here is that as AI hyperscalers invest more and more in AI, proof-of-work becomes increasingly vulnerable because the cost to attack the Bitcoin network is starting to look close to the quarterly CapEx these hyperscalers are spending on their data centers." Full interview on Bankless with Vivek Raman discussing the new Etherealize "Productive Money" report below.

"I used to be a bitcoiner. The transition to a new store of value only happens once every 3,000 years. That's the main prize -- just focus on that. But [security] is the criteria that ultimately convinced me to flip from Bitcoin to ETH." "I have a higher degree of certainty that Ethereum will be around longer [than Bitcoin]. The reason for that is because Bitcoin relies on proof-of-work, which is less efficient than proof-of-stake and doesn't scale with the value of the network. And as the block subsidy of Bitcoin halves every four years, it is increasingly becoming more and more reliant on transaction fees to fund the security budget paid to miners." "If you look at [Bitcoin's] security budget right now, about 0.6% of revenue to miners is transaction fees... The problem with that is if Bitcoin becomes 'digital gold', flips gold, and becomes a $30 trillion asset, but it only costs $10-20 billion to attack it, that's too asymmetric." "You want the security budget to scale with the market cap, similar to how countries spend a % of their GDP on defense. The more valuable something is, the more you need to spend to protect it." "Ethereum, with the Merge, migrated to proof-of-stake, which is fundamentally more secure because it's less reliant on transaction fees and it scales with the value of the network. If 1/3rd of ETH is staked and then you need 1/3rd of those ETH to censor the network, you're looking at roughly 10% of the total market cap as the cost to attack the network." "So if Ethereum flips Bitcoin and gold and becomes a $30 trillion asset, it'll cost ~$3 trillion to attack the Ethereum network versus Bitcoin at like $10 billion." "The other aspect here is that as AI hyperscalers invest more and more in AI, proof-of-work becomes increasingly vulnerable because the cost to attack the Bitcoin network is starting to look close to the quarterly CapEx these hyperscalers are spending on their data centers." Full interview on Bankless with Vivek Raman discussing the new Etherealize "Productive Money" report below.

Michael McGuiness

120,514 views • 4 months ago

Today, I was the lone no vote on increasing the fuel revenue indexing tax. Several people talked about how they’ve generated one billion dollars in revenue from this tax. They’ve made that money off the backs of hard-working people in Clark County who are buying gas who have to get to work - they are paying a tax. That’s where the one billion dollars came from. Now they want to extend it for another ten years. But unlike in 2016 when it was passed on the ballot, now they want to do so without a vote of the people. Yes, we need roads and we need people put to work, but it should have been done the correct way — by a vote of the people.

Today, I was the lone no vote on increasing the fuel revenue indexing tax. Several people talked about how they’ve generated one billion dollars in revenue from this tax. They’ve made that money off the backs of hard-working people in Clark County who are buying gas who have to get to work - they are paying a tax. That’s where the one billion dollars came from. Now they want to extend it for another ten years. But unlike in 2016 when it was passed on the ballot, now they want to do so without a vote of the people. Yes, we need roads and we need people put to work, but it should have been done the correct way — by a vote of the people.

April Becker

20,084 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Dustin

111,803 views • 4 months ago

$MSTR “I like the fact that people don’t understand it, don’t agree with it, or are afraid of it. Because I couldn’t afford to buy it if they all agreed with me.” “When my niece told me she was buying Apple stock in the year 2020… I’m like okay, I think I missed that boat.’” —Michael Saylor There’s a reason why 99.99% of the people in the world aren’t billionaires. They simply lack patience and conviction. Most founders eventually sell. Most investors chase the next opportunity. Most people abandon a thesis long before it has time to play out. Michael Saylor has led Strategy since 1989. It took more than 30 years to build the company into roughly a $1 billion business. The next chapter took it from $1 billion to over $50 billion in under six years. People often focus on the acceleration. They rarely appreciate the decades of patience that made it possible. When someone who has spent a lifetime playing the long game tells you he’s willing to wait another 10 years, it’s worth paying attention. Stay focused. Mission Strategy. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

$MSTR “I like the fact that people don’t understand it, don’t agree with it, or are afraid of it. Because I couldn’t afford to buy it if they all agreed with me.” “When my niece told me she was buying Apple stock in the year 2020… I’m like okay, I think I missed that boat.’” —Michael Saylor There’s a reason why 99.99% of the people in the world aren’t billionaires. They simply lack patience and conviction. Most founders eventually sell. Most investors chase the next opportunity. Most people abandon a thesis long before it has time to play out. Michael Saylor has led Strategy since 1989. It took more than 30 years to build the company into roughly a $1 billion business. The next chapter took it from $1 billion to over $50 billion in under six years. People often focus on the acceleration. They rarely appreciate the decades of patience that made it possible. When someone who has spent a lifetime playing the long game tells you he’s willing to wait another 10 years, it’s worth paying attention. Stay focused. Mission Strategy. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

Zaid 🟧

27,213 views • 1 month ago

A+ NQ setup has exactly three parts. 1. Statistical bias: Probability Map shows 75%+ to one side. Not an opinion. Backtested across 10 years of NQ session data. That number narrows the playing field before price moves an inch. 2. The sweep: Liquidity is resting in the opposite direction. When price grabs it, that is not a fake-out. That is the fuel for the real move. You were expecting it. You were watching for it. 3. The entry model: After the sweep, the structure confirms. iFVG / CISD. A defined ICT concept with clear invalidation. Not a hope, not a gut feel. A model with a precise entry and a reason to be there. Probability tells you where. The sweep tells you when. The entry model tells you how. Remove any one of the three and you do not have an edge. You have a trade. How many of these boxes do you tick before you pull the trigger?

A+ NQ setup has exactly three parts. 1. Statistical bias: Probability Map shows 75%+ to one side. Not an opinion. Backtested across 10 years of NQ session data. That number narrows the playing field before price moves an inch. 2. The sweep: Liquidity is resting in the opposite direction. When price grabs it, that is not a fake-out. That is the fuel for the real move. You were expecting it. You were watching for it. 3. The entry model: After the sweep, the structure confirms. iFVG / CISD. A defined ICT concept with clear invalidation. Not a hope, not a gut feel. A model with a precise entry and a reason to be there. Probability tells you where. The sweep tells you when. The entry model tells you how. Remove any one of the three and you do not have an edge. You have a trade. How many of these boxes do you tick before you pull the trigger?

Herman Trading

20,079 views • 3 months ago

The most powerful force in the oil market is now a single country that doesn't produce a drop. OPEC IS DEAD And here's why you should change how you think about energy for the next decade: China controls the oil price not by pumping it, but by REFUSING TO BUY IT. For two years, while the West wasn't paying attention, China built a war chest of crude. They bought cheap, sanctioned barrels at $60 while everyone else looked the other way. They stacked a reserve now estimated between 1.2 and 1.5 BILLION barrels. Then the world got its biggest supply shock in modern history and instead of panic-buying like everyone else, China did the opposite. They stopped importing and started eating their own stockpile. Chinese crude imports collapsed from 11.6 million barrels a day to under 8 million - the lowest level since 2017. That single decision accounted for roughly 74% of the entire drop in global oil demand, according to JPMorgan. Sit with that number for a second. The world lost 14% of its crude supply. In 1973, OPEC cut off just 7% and the price exploded 134%. This shock was twice as large. But oil went the other way. WTI sits at $74 today. Because the world's largest buyer simply walked out of the store and lived off its pantry. THAT is the new OPEC. For 50 years we obsessed over the Saudis. We watched OPEC meetings like Fed meetings, parsing every production quota. Those days are ending and the most powerful swing force in oil is no longer a cartel that controls supply. It's one country that controls DEMAND. And demand is the harder lever. You can cheat on a production quota but you can't force a billion-barrel buyer to show up if it doesn't want to. Here's what this means for your money right now: China has capped the upside. As long as they're sitting on that hoard, they sell into every rally toward $100. No spike gets to run. The right tail is gone - stop dreaming about $150 oil. But they've also built the floor. Those reserves are draining fast. JPMorgan expects China back as a major buyer by August to start refilling. The US has to refill its own SPR, now at its lowest since 1990. Everyone has to restock at once. You don't get $100 oil - China sells it to you. You don't get $50 oil - China and everyone else has to come back and buy it. You get a range. And right now we're sitting at the bottom of it. Crude is parked on its 200-day moving average. Retail traders are positioned near record short in Brent. Sentiment is in the gutter, RSI under 30. When the entire crowd leans the same way off the same wrong assumption, I want the other side of that trade. If I had to bet the next $10 or $15 move in crude, I'm betting higher. Because the most important player in the oil market already told you exactly what it's going to do. The Saudis didn't break OPEC. China did - by building a reserve nobody could see and refusing to spend it when it mattered most.

The most powerful force in the oil market is now a single country that doesn't produce a drop. OPEC IS DEAD And here's why you should change how you think about energy for the next decade: China controls the oil price not by pumping it, but by REFUSING TO BUY IT. For two years, while the West wasn't paying attention, China built a war chest of crude. They bought cheap, sanctioned barrels at $60 while everyone else looked the other way. They stacked a reserve now estimated between 1.2 and 1.5 BILLION barrels. Then the world got its biggest supply shock in modern history and instead of panic-buying like everyone else, China did the opposite. They stopped importing and started eating their own stockpile. Chinese crude imports collapsed from 11.6 million barrels a day to under 8 million - the lowest level since 2017. That single decision accounted for roughly 74% of the entire drop in global oil demand, according to JPMorgan. Sit with that number for a second. The world lost 14% of its crude supply. In 1973, OPEC cut off just 7% and the price exploded 134%. This shock was twice as large. But oil went the other way. WTI sits at $74 today. Because the world's largest buyer simply walked out of the store and lived off its pantry. THAT is the new OPEC. For 50 years we obsessed over the Saudis. We watched OPEC meetings like Fed meetings, parsing every production quota. Those days are ending and the most powerful swing force in oil is no longer a cartel that controls supply. It's one country that controls DEMAND. And demand is the harder lever. You can cheat on a production quota but you can't force a billion-barrel buyer to show up if it doesn't want to. Here's what this means for your money right now: China has capped the upside. As long as they're sitting on that hoard, they sell into every rally toward $100. No spike gets to run. The right tail is gone - stop dreaming about $150 oil. But they've also built the floor. Those reserves are draining fast. JPMorgan expects China back as a major buyer by August to start refilling. The US has to refill its own SPR, now at its lowest since 1990. Everyone has to restock at once. You don't get $100 oil - China sells it to you. You don't get $50 oil - China and everyone else has to come back and buy it. You get a range. And right now we're sitting at the bottom of it. Crude is parked on its 200-day moving average. Retail traders are positioned near record short in Brent. Sentiment is in the gutter, RSI under 30. When the entire crowd leans the same way off the same wrong assumption, I want the other side of that trade. If I had to bet the next $10 or $15 move in crude, I'm betting higher. Because the most important player in the oil market already told you exactly what it's going to do. The Saudis didn't break OPEC. China did - by building a reserve nobody could see and refusing to spend it when it mattered most.

George Noble

58,425 views • 2 months ago

"Stretch could stay below 100 for ten years, twenty years. They could hike the dividend, not change it, pause it, or cut it. But you continue to receive the dividend until they change that" Ryan Rasmussen on why Strategy investors are panicking over the wrong things "They sold 32 Bitcoin and everyone is freaking out. They bought over a thousand the next week. People are so focused on the fact they sold 32" "I think it was a good thing that they sold 32. When Bitcoin recovers to 80, 90, 100 plus k we will look back and think it was silly that everyone was freaking out"

"Stretch could stay below 100 for ten years, twenty years. They could hike the dividend, not change it, pause it, or cut it. But you continue to receive the dividend until they change that" Ryan Rasmussen on why Strategy investors are panicking over the wrong things "They sold 32 Bitcoin and everyone is freaking out. They bought over a thousand the next week. People are so focused on the fact they sold 32" "I think it was a good thing that they sold 32. When Bitcoin recovers to 80, 90, 100 plus k we will look back and think it was silly that everyone was freaking out"

The Wolf Of All Streets

101,757 views • 2 months ago

YOU TRADE THE CANDLES, THE PEOPLE MOVING PRICE TRADE THE ORDERS THAT HAVEN'T FILLED YET One ratio reads the book. I = (V_bid − V_ask) / (V_bid + V_ask) It weighs resting size on both sides. Positive means buyers are stacked and sellers are thin. Negative means the floor under you is fake. Strip the math away. A candle tells you what already happened. The book tells you what is about to. Watch the middle of that map thin out. Liquidity always disappears right before the move everyone calls unexpected. Minara dragged this off the trading floor. Type it in plain English, it writes the Python and hands you the backtest. One sentence to a live strategy & every number, drawdowns included, sits in the article. Read it ↓

YOU TRADE THE CANDLES, THE PEOPLE MOVING PRICE TRADE THE ORDERS THAT HAVEN'T FILLED YET One ratio reads the book. I = (V_bid − V_ask) / (V_bid + V_ask) It weighs resting size on both sides. Positive means buyers are stacked and sellers are thin. Negative means the floor under you is fake. Strip the math away. A candle tells you what already happened. The book tells you what is about to. Watch the middle of that map thin out. Liquidity always disappears right before the move everyone calls unexpected. Minara dragged this off the trading floor. Type it in plain English, it writes the Python and hands you the backtest. One sentence to a live strategy & every number, drawdowns included, sits in the article. Read it ↓

slash1s

64,565 views • 27 days ago

Restaurateur Jeff Zalaznick opened Carbone Miami just 100 days after signing the lease. He says the secret to turning around a massive project quickly is: don’t try to build from scratch. “I said, ‘Here's the thing. You can spend as much money as you want, but there's two conditions: Nothing can be moved. If there's a light, it can be a different light, but it has to stay there. If there's an outlet, it has to stay there. The kitchen does not change. The bar that's there, you can do whatever you want to it, but it cannot move. Nothing can move. Here's the other catch: you have 90 days to do it.’” “The floor plan was the same as the restaurant before it.” “That restaurant with the same floor plan was doing about ~$7 million in revenue. When we opened Carbone with the same exact seats, that restaurant does over $30 million in revenue.”

Restaurateur Jeff Zalaznick opened Carbone Miami just 100 days after signing the lease. He says the secret to turning around a massive project quickly is: don’t try to build from scratch. “I said, ‘Here's the thing. You can spend as much money as you want, but there's two conditions: Nothing can be moved. If there's a light, it can be a different light, but it has to stay there. If there's an outlet, it has to stay there. The kitchen does not change. The bar that's there, you can do whatever you want to it, but it cannot move. Nothing can move. Here's the other catch: you have 90 days to do it.’” “The floor plan was the same as the restaurant before it.” “That restaurant with the same floor plan was doing about ~$7 million in revenue. When we opened Carbone with the same exact seats, that restaurant does over $30 million in revenue.”

David Senra

239,457 views • 1 month ago

The OG investors already made their fortune on Bitcoin. Now they're diversifying, and that's the sell pressure hitting your screen right now. That's Matt Hougan, Bitwise CIO. The market's bleeding and he's calling it an opportunity. His math: store of value keeps growing like it has, Bitcoin takes a quarter of it, and you land at 1.3 million per coin. But that's not where he's putting money now. He's looking at a market trying to move 650 trillion in assets into a space worth 200 to 300 billion today. Get that right and 200 billion becomes 2 trillion. His top pick might surprise you 👇

The OG investors already made their fortune on Bitcoin. Now they're diversifying, and that's the sell pressure hitting your screen right now. That's Matt Hougan, Bitwise CIO. The market's bleeding and he's calling it an opportunity. His math: store of value keeps growing like it has, Bitcoin takes a quarter of it, and you land at 1.3 million per coin. But that's not where he's putting money now. He's looking at a market trying to move 650 trillion in assets into a space worth 200 to 300 billion today. Get that right and 200 billion becomes 2 trillion. His top pick might surprise you 👇

Kyle Chassé 🐸

35,758 views • 2 months ago

Dave Ramsey reveals he has 'several hundred million dollars in net worth' and buys new cars explaining exactly why he tells everyone else not to “The rich get richer and the poor get poorer because the rich people keep doing rich people stuff and poor people keep doing poor people's stuff, and middle class people keep taking out car payments on new cars that they can't really afford to pull a pop-up camper.” “You're going to lose $10,000 when you drive it across the curb and it goes bloom. That was the sound of $10,000.” “Now, I waste that much money. I buy new cars, but I've got several hundred million dollars in net worth and so I can afford the blimpl. The building I'm sitting in 600 million. So, you just, it's okay. But I want you to get there.”

Dave Ramsey reveals he has 'several hundred million dollars in net worth' and buys new cars explaining exactly why he tells everyone else not to “The rich get richer and the poor get poorer because the rich people keep doing rich people stuff and poor people keep doing poor people's stuff, and middle class people keep taking out car payments on new cars that they can't really afford to pull a pop-up camper.” “You're going to lose $10,000 when you drive it across the curb and it goes bloom. That was the sound of $10,000.” “Now, I waste that much money. I buy new cars, but I've got several hundred million dollars in net worth and so I can afford the blimpl. The building I'm sitting in 600 million. So, you just, it's okay. But I want you to get there.”

Hribi

269,501 views • 1 month ago

So when Lloyd enhances the powers of others, shares his strength, and connects to the world around him, everyone thinks it's great, but when the Overlord does the same thing, then it becomes a bad thing. It's clear who the favorites are here

So when Lloyd enhances the powers of others, shares his strength, and connects to the world around him, everyone thinks it's great, but when the Overlord does the same thing, then it becomes a bad thing. It's clear who the favorites are here

Ninjago Shitpost

12,917 views • 4 months ago

The Art of the First Day - SpaceX Edition $SPCX comes public Friday in its record-setting $1.75 billion IPO. The question is how to trade it? The Art of the First Day answers by focusing on 2 things: -Where fear sets in -Where FOMO sets in You can argue all day about valuation and growth potential. But the the price action will show you where real demand and supply are. That's how we get paid. I've used the Art of the First Day in countless names over the years - everything from $CBRS to $COIN to $HOOD to $META and even oldies like $LNKD and $TWTR. And you can learn it here for free:

The Art of the First Day - SpaceX Edition $SPCX comes public Friday in its record-setting $1.75 billion IPO. The question is how to trade it? The Art of the First Day answers by focusing on 2 things: -Where fear sets in -Where FOMO sets in You can argue all day about valuation and growth potential. But the the price action will show you where real demand and supply are. That's how we get paid. I've used the Art of the First Day in countless names over the years - everything from $CBRS to $COIN to $HOOD to $META and even oldies like $LNKD and $TWTR. And you can learn it here for free:

Scott Redler

57,026 views • 2 months ago

Governor Uba Sani: Anyone in Nigeria who tells you that the number of police and military personnel is enough to govern this country is being either mischievous or insincere. Many states have established vigilante services, but do you know why they are not effective? It is because constitution prohibit them from holding arms, meaning that when they are sent to protect the lives and property of the people, it is like sending them to a death sentence.

Governor Uba Sani: Anyone in Nigeria who tells you that the number of police and military personnel is enough to govern this country is being either mischievous or insincere. Many states have established vigilante services, but do you know why they are not effective? It is because constitution prohibit them from holding arms, meaning that when they are sent to protect the lives and property of the people, it is like sending them to a death sentence.

Imran Muhammad

50,806 views • 2 months ago

You buy #Bitcoin at the price you admit you were wrong about Bitcoin. Everyone feels that they "missed" Bitcoin. Most people turn this bitterness into resentment towards Bitcoin. They don't want Bitcoin to succeed, only because of their own selfish regret that they didn't buy it earlier. That's all. Few have the strength of character to overcome that childish reflex... To come to terms with that regret long enough to study Bitcoin... To accept that you missed out on the 10,000x, but you can still grow your wealth 100x... and that's pretty fucking incredible. That's the price of admission. And only ~1/2000th of the world has gotten there, so far. If you've made that journey, appreciate what you've accomplished. You're ahead of 99.95% of the world. You did the hard work of accepting that you were wrong about Bitcoin & changing your views. And you deserve the wealth that Bitcoin brings you. (video from The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ podcast with Cedric Youngelman ⚡️ )

You buy #Bitcoin at the price you admit you were wrong about Bitcoin. Everyone feels that they "missed" Bitcoin. Most people turn this bitterness into resentment towards Bitcoin. They don't want Bitcoin to succeed, only because of their own selfish regret that they didn't buy it earlier. That's all. Few have the strength of character to overcome that childish reflex... To come to terms with that regret long enough to study Bitcoin... To accept that you missed out on the 10,000x, but you can still grow your wealth 100x... and that's pretty fucking incredible. That's the price of admission. And only ~1/2000th of the world has gotten there, so far. If you've made that journey, appreciate what you've accomplished. You're ahead of 99.95% of the world. You did the hard work of accepting that you were wrong about Bitcoin & changing your views. And you deserve the wealth that Bitcoin brings you. (video from The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ podcast with Cedric Youngelman ⚡️ )

Jesse Myers

145,202 views • 1 year ago

LAWRENCE LEPARD: "This is one of the best investment opportunities out there. It actually is the best in my opinion, if you can handle the volatility... having a zero allocation to it is just absolutely nuts." "When you buy into a network that's going to get adopted by everybody, the returns are just insane. My opinion is that Bitcoin is the monetary network of the future." "...And when it is... guess what, these are 5 million a coin or more." "The people that run the government, their major goal is to keep themselves in power and to keep the system running. They don't care about inflation. They say they do, but they don't. And they lie to us about that. And we know that if and when the sharp end of the stick comes for them, they're going to print the money to keep things going."

LAWRENCE LEPARD: "This is one of the best investment opportunities out there. It actually is the best in my opinion, if you can handle the volatility... having a zero allocation to it is just absolutely nuts." "When you buy into a network that's going to get adopted by everybody, the returns are just insane. My opinion is that Bitcoin is the monetary network of the future." "...And when it is... guess what, these are 5 million a coin or more." "The people that run the government, their major goal is to keep themselves in power and to keep the system running. They don't care about inflation. They say they do, but they don't. And they lie to us about that. And we know that if and when the sharp end of the stick comes for them, they're going to print the money to keep things going."

Simply Bitcoin

32,186 views • 1 month ago