Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Exciting research developments: deliberate sauna use ramps up pathways crucial for muscle growth, more so when combined with resistance training. This suggests a potential synergistic effect for muscle hypertrophy. Though we need larger studies for confirmation, it's noteworthy that this isn't the first time heat has been shown to...

468,374 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Dr. Rhonda Patrick's profile picture
Dr. Rhonda Patrick2 years ago

"The Effect of Heat Stress on Heat Shock Protein Expression and Hypertrophy-Related Signaling in the Skeletal Muscle of Trained Individuals"

Zachary Fennel's profile picture
Zachary Fennel2 years ago

Thanks for sharing our work! Excited to see what others can do with this information in the future.

Dr. Rhonda Patrick's profile picture
Dr. Rhonda Patrick2 years ago

Congratulations on the publication! This one registers high on the hierarchy of my niche personal interests, so it was a pleasure to be able to share. (And a hat tip to @BradSchoenfeld for putting it on my radar.) Thank you for your note.

TimZ - The Sauna Guy's profile picture
TimZ - The Sauna Guy2 years ago

The more that is studied about the use of sauna, the more that we find out about its extensive benefits. I believe that the mental and psychological benefits of sauna are next to be discovered.

Dr. Rhonda Patrick's profile picture
Dr. Rhonda Patrick2 years ago

Agreed! Worth keeping an eye out for the HEATBED study out of UCSF:

betaplux's profile picture
betaplux2 years ago

Me while reading this ☺️

Dana Carrabon's profile picture
Dana Carrabon2 years ago

Do hot baths any comparable effects?

Dr. Rhonda Patrick's profile picture
Dr. Rhonda Patrick2 years ago

They do for other biomarkers like heat shock protein activation and BDNF activation. They also have similar blood pressure-lowering effects and glucose regulation improvements. It is my opinion they are comparable. Most of the hot tub studies are 104 F, 20-30 minutes, shoulders down.

Frank's profile picture
Frank2 years ago

How long in the sauna ?

Dr. Rhonda Patrick's profile picture
Dr. Rhonda Patrick2 years ago

This study had a pretty low temperature of 140 F, and participants stayed in for 1 hour. Other studies have found that 30 minutes at 163 F increases heat shock proteins 2-fold.

Related Videos

Up to 30% of the weight lost while dieting can come from lean muscle mass—but the right training and nutrition can help you preserve muscle, which is key for metabolic health and reducing the risk of sarcopenia. You can lose fat and gain muscle at the same time—a process called body recomposition—if you train and eat strategically. The most important factor is resistance training. Lifting heavy 2–3 times per week is essential for maintaining and building muscle while losing fat. Without it, muscle mass inevitably declines. Nutrition also plays a major role. Eating in a slight calorie deficit—around 10–20% below maintenance—allows for steady fat loss without sacrificing muscle, energy levels, or training performance. Protein intake is another key priority. Research shows that consuming 1.8 to 2.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day is optimal for muscle retention and growth during a calorie deficit, and going even higher may provide additional benefits. Beyond training and nutrition, recovery is just as crucial. Adequate sleep, stress management, and tracking progress help ensure you’re making real, sustainable changes. Get this right and you have a powerful strategy to build muscle and lose fat. If you want to learn more about optimizing body recomposition, improving VO2 max, and enhancing brain health, tune into the latest episode of the FoundMyFitness podcast, where and I break it all down with insights from top experts. Link to the full episode on YouTube:

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

120,402 views • 1 year ago

Training for an Ultra in 100 Degrees I think there’s an argument that this year’s Javelina 100 was the hottest super-competitive ultra ever run. Nearly 100 degrees record heat, absolutely no shade or creeks, with a 5-day desert pre-bake. Also, I always thought that I sucked in hot weather. We were going to have to science the crap out of this problem. My heat training protocol involved 3 interventions: 1. Passive heat exposure via hot tub. Studies on hot water immersion show an increase in blood volume and heat tolerance, plus enhanced capillary function 2. Active heat exposure via heat suit training. Since 2021, 10+ studies have shown that as little as 3 weeks of heat suit training sessions can increase hemoglobin mass. My heat suit involved a base layer of normal running clothes, a sweatshirt under a down jacket, and polyester sweatpants under winter rain pants. Plus a fuzzy hat 3. Strenuous heat exposure via treadmill workouts in a warm room Here is the protocol Megan and I settled on to balance stress with training adaptations: 1. Hot tub at 104 degrees F 2-3 times per week. I stayed in until my heart rate reached 100-110 (100 on rest days, 110 when immediately after training) 2. At 4 weeks out, I started using the heat suit for 15 minutes on the uphill treadmill after runs 3 times per week, starting at moderate intensity to get my core temperature up rapidly, then dialing it back. 3 weeks out, I added 1 x 90 minute heat suit run. 2 weeks out, 1 x 90 min heat suit bike plus a 1 hour heat suit run 3. Two massive treadmill workouts in a room that was around 80 degrees 2.5 and 3.5 weeks out 4. On race week, I did hot tub every day including the day before the race, since studies show the hemoglobin mass adaptations can reverse rapidly In the race day furnace, my main goal was to gaslight myself into thinking I enjoyed the heat (which is also backed up by studies finding that emotional perception of temperature influences physiological response). In reality, I still don’t love the heat. But I love science. And I think we scienced this problem so hard that I had one of the better heat performances ever 🔥🧡 Race video from the amazing Emily Cameron 🙌

David Roche

19,018 views • 1 year ago

Saunas Can Reduce Food Intake?! – New Insights from Nature 🔥🧠 (2 min science breakdown clip) It’s been observed that heat exposure reduces food intake both in humans and animals, leading some to suggest heat stress may be a weight management tool. And new science is beginning to unpack how heat may suppress appetite. Get ready for a steam burst of jargon, then I’ll simplify: A 2024 paper published in nature (PMID: 38538787) found that heat 🔥activates specialized cells that line the fluid-filled spaces in the brain called, “tanycytes.” 🎯These tanycytes are optimally placed to communicate external signals to regions of the brain, in particular the hypothalamus, that control things like metabolism and food intake. 🔥This study found that heat stress in a mouse model at 40°C for 1 hour increased activity in a temperature sensing brain region, the “pontine parabrachial nucleus (PBN)” 👉which signals to tanycytes and causes them to 👉produce a brain chemical VEGFA, which in turn 👉 signals to the hypothalamus to change the activity of dopamine and AGRP neurons and leads to reduce food intake. (Please see clip for a visual explanation) 🚨High-Level Takeaway: The researchers discovered a causal mechanism for the effects of heat on reducing food intake, and aligns with data in humans that heat can reduce food intake. More details about sauna in today’s #StayCurious Newsletter (linked in first reply), including discussion of heart health, brain health, longevity, and with a healthy shoutout to Dr. Rhonda Patrick (who I suspect might be interested in this Tanycytes Mechanism, if it's not already on her radar) Some folks interesting in Sauna and/or Neuroscience Mechanisms: Dan Go Gary Brecka Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. (Wonder what will be in #Protocols: An Operating Manual for the Human Body on Saunas?📖🐰🕳️?) Rob Mohr Robb Wolf Nicholas Fabiano, MD Amy Berger Meat Head Chris Palmer, MD #sauna #neuroscience #longevity #healthspan #appetite #metabolichealth

Nick Norwitz MD PhD

10,902 views • 1 year ago

Do you need to train heavy to build muscle? 💪 For years the mantra was you need to go heavy to build muscle. Or you needed to go heavy to stimulate large type II fast twitch fibers but go light for more reps to stimulate smaller type I fibers. But new research has challenged that dogma. Several meta-analysis have shown similar muscle growth with low loads vs high loads when set number is matched & proximity to failure is similar (PMIDs: 28834797, 35015560, 33312275, & 33433148). While muscle hypertrophy was not different between high and low load training, strength increased significantly more with high load training in all these meta-analysis As far as targeting fiber types, it becomes kind of irrelevant when you take an exercise close to failure because fiber types tend to be recruited in order from smallest to largest. So with high load training, small & large fibers get recruited quickly but you don’t do many reps. With low load training, you initially recruit smaller fibers but as the muscle fatigues it is forced to recruit the larger fibers as the exercise is taken close to failure. The net effect is that taking sets close to failure with high or low loads produces a lot of muscle activation and similar hypetrophy The take home is, do what you enjoy if muscle growth is the goal. Just make sure you train HARD & go close to failure (within a few reps) & do enough total sets. But if strength is a priority you’ll need to train heavy & be careful going to failure as it can impair strength gains From my first conversation with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Layne Norton, PhD

53,287 views • 1 year ago