正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

#Exclusive | 'AT-1 issue may be termed technical, but if customers are hurt, it becomes a conduct lapse' Former #HDFCBank Chair Atanu Chakraborty tells Shereen Bhan. Flags reputational risk, questions delayed action after 8 years. #Governance #Banking

CNBC-TV18

1,143,192 subscribers

73,947 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

#Exclusive #HDFCBank #Governance #Banking

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Responsible AI should not feel like the path of most resistance. That was the strongest idea from my SAS Innovate conversation with Reggie Townsend, leading Data Ethics, Governance, and Social Impact at SAS Software. Reggie framed governance not as a compliance layer, but as a way to scale human judgment. Too often, we innovate first and govern later. Model selected. Agent deployed. Process built. Then governance arrives at the end and feels like friction. Bolt it on after the fact, and resistance is guaranteed. The opportunity: design responsible AI, so it becomes intuitive, action-oriented, and useful in the flow of work. That is what Reggie meant by making responsibility "irresistible." Second point: Use cases must lead. When everyone can access the same models, differentiation will not come from the technology. It will come from how leaders define outcomes, govern applications, and connect business value to institutional trust. The risk does not live in the model. The value does not live in the model. Both live in the use case. For CEOs and boards, this is the shift: from model-first oversight to outcome-first accountability. Better questions before scaling AI: - What human decision are we shaping? - What business outcome are we improving? - What risk are we containing? - What judgment are we extending? Responsible AI becomes strategic when it helps people make better decisions, faster, with greater confidence. Most leaders can't see where governance sits inside their AI operating model. SAS AI Navigator makes it visible: Design for the human. Not only the technology.

Responsible AI should not feel like the path of most resistance. That was the strongest idea from my SAS Innovate conversation with Reggie Townsend, leading Data Ethics, Governance, and Social Impact at SAS Software. Reggie framed governance not as a compliance layer, but as a way to scale human judgment. Too often, we innovate first and govern later. Model selected. Agent deployed. Process built. Then governance arrives at the end and feels like friction. Bolt it on after the fact, and resistance is guaranteed. The opportunity: design responsible AI, so it becomes intuitive, action-oriented, and useful in the flow of work. That is what Reggie meant by making responsibility "irresistible." Second point: Use cases must lead. When everyone can access the same models, differentiation will not come from the technology. It will come from how leaders define outcomes, govern applications, and connect business value to institutional trust. The risk does not live in the model. The value does not live in the model. Both live in the use case. For CEOs and boards, this is the shift: from model-first oversight to outcome-first accountability. Better questions before scaling AI: - What human decision are we shaping? - What business outcome are we improving? - What risk are we containing? - What judgment are we extending? Responsible AI becomes strategic when it helps people make better decisions, faster, with greater confidence. Most leaders can't see where governance sits inside their AI operating model. SAS AI Navigator makes it visible: Design for the human. Not only the technology.

Sabine VanderLinden

835,838 次观看 • 4 个月前

Jordi Visser doubts the Anthropic IPO will happen at all after the last 72 hours, let alone at $3T "First of all, I think a story that will be developing is, will they actually be doing an IPO, based on what they've done in the last seventy two hours?" "When you have a former employee leave and say the world's gonna end, and then you have his boss come out and endorse the statement, during a quiet period for the company." "The number one risk with these companies is, like any company that can have liability against them, if there's going to be hackings and you come out and sue them, how is that going to be handled? So investors are going to have a lot more questions." "If they do do it, I don't think you're going to get the three trillion dollar valuation they thought, and I think they're going to have to disclose a lot of this stuff. So it may be delayed because of this. I don't know how much of this was orchestrated, I don't know how much was a mistake, but it definitely seems like there's going to have to be some changes in the IPO in terms of the approach."

Jordi Visser doubts the Anthropic IPO will happen at all after the last 72 hours, let alone at $3T "First of all, I think a story that will be developing is, will they actually be doing an IPO, based on what they've done in the last seventy two hours?" "When you have a former employee leave and say the world's gonna end, and then you have his boss come out and endorse the statement, during a quiet period for the company." "The number one risk with these companies is, like any company that can have liability against them, if there's going to be hackings and you come out and sue them, how is that going to be handled? So investors are going to have a lot more questions." "If they do do it, I don't think you're going to get the three trillion dollar valuation they thought, and I think they're going to have to disclose a lot of this stuff. So it may be delayed because of this. I don't know how much of this was orchestrated, I don't know how much was a mistake, but it definitely seems like there's going to have to be some changes in the IPO in terms of the approach."

The Wolf Of All Streets

35,173 次观看 • 22 天前

It is vital that what happened to my daughter Paloma is properly and independently investigated, not only for her sake but because the clinicians involved continue to work in frontline, high-risk roles including anaesthesia, intensive care, air ambulance medicine, and medical training. Where sworn evidence, drug charts, observation data, and imaging raise serious questions about excessive dosing of paralysing agents, failure to recognise classic signs of adrenaline-related pulmonary oedema, and delays or inconsistencies in clinical decision-making, the issue is no longer private or historical. It becomes a matter of public safety. Patients are entitled to expect that doctors administering powerful drugs such as adrenaline and rocuronium understand their effects, recognise deterioration when it occurs, and act promptly to correct it. If those standards were not met here, and if that has not been transparently examined, then the public may remain at risk. This is why scrutiny, accountability, and full investigation are not optional, and why this matter is plainly in the public interest.

It is vital that what happened to my daughter Paloma is properly and independently investigated, not only for her sake but because the clinicians involved continue to work in frontline, high-risk roles including anaesthesia, intensive care, air ambulance medicine, and medical training. Where sworn evidence, drug charts, observation data, and imaging raise serious questions about excessive dosing of paralysing agents, failure to recognise classic signs of adrenaline-related pulmonary oedema, and delays or inconsistencies in clinical decision-making, the issue is no longer private or historical. It becomes a matter of public safety. Patients are entitled to expect that doctors administering powerful drugs such as adrenaline and rocuronium understand their effects, recognise deterioration when it occurs, and act promptly to correct it. If those standards were not met here, and if that has not been transparently examined, then the public may remain at risk. This is why scrutiny, accountability, and full investigation are not optional, and why this matter is plainly in the public interest.

Kate Shemirani

24,117 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨UPDATE: Bloomberg Reports CLARITY Act May NOT PASS Until July BECAUSE OF “LIMITED TIME FLOOR” — “MAYBE JULY, IF WE’RE LUCKY” 😳🇺🇸🔥 In a new Bloomberg interview, Global Blockchain Business Council (GBBC) CEO Sandra Ro signaled the CLARITY Act may be DELAYED to SUMMER due to LIMITED FLOOR TIME in Congress, NOT YIELD ISSUE. 👀 “If we’re lucky… maybe JULY, maybe later than that.” 🇺🇸 The bill is still moving through the Senate Banking Committee process, but Sandra believes the REAL problem now is the CONGRESSIONAL CALENDAR and LIMITED floor time. ⚠️ “If you look at the math on the calendar, it’s limited… you’ve got a number of other priorities.” 😳 👉 Senate Banking Committee STILL finalizing key provisions 👉 Bill must pass FULL Senate + secure floor debate time 👉 Congressional calendar is LIMITED with competing priorities That means even if yield issue negotiations are resolved… timing is now the MAIN bottleneck. 🤯🔥 ⚠️Attention: This is NOT a confirmed info regarding the CLARITY Act deadline as it shows only the personal opinion of Sandra Ro. More to come. I'll update.

🚨UPDATE: Bloomberg Reports CLARITY Act May NOT PASS Until July BECAUSE OF “LIMITED TIME FLOOR” — “MAYBE JULY, IF WE’RE LUCKY” 😳🇺🇸🔥 In a new Bloomberg interview, Global Blockchain Business Council (GBBC) CEO Sandra Ro signaled the CLARITY Act may be DELAYED to SUMMER due to LIMITED FLOOR TIME in Congress, NOT YIELD ISSUE. 👀 “If we’re lucky… maybe JULY, maybe later than that.” 🇺🇸 The bill is still moving through the Senate Banking Committee process, but Sandra believes the REAL problem now is the CONGRESSIONAL CALENDAR and LIMITED floor time. ⚠️ “If you look at the math on the calendar, it’s limited… you’ve got a number of other priorities.” 😳 👉 Senate Banking Committee STILL finalizing key provisions 👉 Bill must pass FULL Senate + secure floor debate time 👉 Congressional calendar is LIMITED with competing priorities That means even if yield issue negotiations are resolved… timing is now the MAIN bottleneck. 🤯🔥 ⚠️Attention: This is NOT a confirmed info regarding the CLARITY Act deadline as it shows only the personal opinion of Sandra Ro. More to come. I'll update.

Diana

53,969 次观看 • 6 个月前

Today in Parliament, I raised concerns affecting India’s prepaid recharge customers, who account for nearly 90% of the country’s 125 crore mobile users. (1) If a recharge expires, stopping outgoing calls may be understandable. But why are incoming calls stopped as well? Once validity ends, people cannot be reached, and even essential messages like bank OTPs may not come through. In emergencies or urgent situations, this can leave a person completely cut off. My demands: First is that incoming calls and SMS should continue for at least one year after the last recharge so essential communication does not stop. Second, a mobile number should not be deactivated for at least three years after the last recharge. Third, telecom operators should introduce a low cost “incoming only” plan for users who simply need their number to remain active for essential calls, OTPs and government services. (2) I also raised the issue of 28 day recharge “monthly” plans. If something is called monthly, it should follow the calendar month of 30–31 days. Because of the 28 day cycle, consumers effectively end up paying for 13 recharges in a year. (28 days × 13 recharges = 364 days) Telecom Operators should sync up their Recharge Plans with the true calendar months, and not 28 day plans. A mobile phone today is not a luxury. It is a lifeline. Prepaid recharge customers deserve fairness and transparency. Not clever fine print.

Today in Parliament, I raised concerns affecting India’s prepaid recharge customers, who account for nearly 90% of the country’s 125 crore mobile users. (1) If a recharge expires, stopping outgoing calls may be understandable. But why are incoming calls stopped as well? Once validity ends, people cannot be reached, and even essential messages like bank OTPs may not come through. In emergencies or urgent situations, this can leave a person completely cut off. My demands: First is that incoming calls and SMS should continue for at least one year after the last recharge so essential communication does not stop. Second, a mobile number should not be deactivated for at least three years after the last recharge. Third, telecom operators should introduce a low cost “incoming only” plan for users who simply need their number to remain active for essential calls, OTPs and government services. (2) I also raised the issue of 28 day recharge “monthly” plans. If something is called monthly, it should follow the calendar month of 30–31 days. Because of the 28 day cycle, consumers effectively end up paying for 13 recharges in a year. (28 days × 13 recharges = 364 days) Telecom Operators should sync up their Recharge Plans with the true calendar months, and not 28 day plans. A mobile phone today is not a luxury. It is a lifeline. Prepaid recharge customers deserve fairness and transparency. Not clever fine print.

Raghav Chadha

186,564 次观看 • 6 个月前

This is exactly what I’m talking about. The driver may have been completely wrong, but that does not give a Road Safety Officer the excuse to recklessly endanger the lives of everyone else on the road, including himself. Law enforcement is not supposed to become a greater danger than the offence being punished. If the very people responsible for road safety are creating situations that could cause serious crashes or deaths, then that is not enforcement. It is gross irresponsibility and a failure of professionalism. There must be accountability. Officers should not be allowed to hide behind the authority of their uniforms when their conduct puts lives at risk. Every reckless enforcement action should be investigated, and where an officer is found to have acted improperly, there should be consequences. Road safety must mean safety for everyone.

This is exactly what I’m talking about. The driver may have been completely wrong, but that does not give a Road Safety Officer the excuse to recklessly endanger the lives of everyone else on the road, including himself. Law enforcement is not supposed to become a greater danger than the offence being punished. If the very people responsible for road safety are creating situations that could cause serious crashes or deaths, then that is not enforcement. It is gross irresponsibility and a failure of professionalism. There must be accountability. Officers should not be allowed to hide behind the authority of their uniforms when their conduct puts lives at risk. Every reckless enforcement action should be investigated, and where an officer is found to have acted improperly, there should be consequences. Road safety must mean safety for everyone.

Maroon_Beret

309,915 次观看 • 1 个月前

Shocking Report. There are now record numbers of young people dying. If diagnosed with #Myocarditus 50% of people may only live for 5 years. 75% of people diagnosed will die within 10 years. These are deeply concerning statistics but medically verified. Turbo cancers appearing at stage 4. Dr William Makis from the Wellness Company joins me as a guest. "injury to the heart could be as high as 1 in 30 people per injection" "spike protein in the heart is a very big issue" People can fight back and take action. Go to and use CODE:JIM10 for people who want to get spike reducing supplements and associated products for a saving of 10% which have been proven to reduce the spike proteins responsible for the damage being caused to the vaccine injured.#VaccineInjured #ExcessDeaths #SpikeProtein #SuddenDeaths #mRNA #Canada #UK #USA #Australia #NewZealand #Ivermectin MakisMD The Wellness Company Warning: These may not be available if governments get away with attempts to regulate. Don't wait until its too late.

Shocking Report. There are now record numbers of young people dying. If diagnosed with #Myocarditus 50% of people may only live for 5 years. 75% of people diagnosed will die within 10 years. These are deeply concerning statistics but medically verified. Turbo cancers appearing at stage 4. Dr William Makis from the Wellness Company joins me as a guest. "injury to the heart could be as high as 1 in 30 people per injection" "spike protein in the heart is a very big issue" People can fight back and take action. Go to and use CODE:JIM10 for people who want to get spike reducing supplements and associated products for a saving of 10% which have been proven to reduce the spike proteins responsible for the damage being caused to the vaccine injured.#VaccineInjured #ExcessDeaths #SpikeProtein #SuddenDeaths #mRNA #Canada #UK #USA #Australia #NewZealand #Ivermectin MakisMD The Wellness Company Warning: These may not be available if governments get away with attempts to regulate. Don't wait until its too late.

Jim Ferguson

259,950 次观看 • 3 年前

When your wages do not increase at the same rate of the things we’re buying, its clear - we are in a cost of living crisis! Investing your money with Wahed gives it the opportunity to grow and work for you. And keeping your Money Halal is easy with Wahed - Whether you want to invest in stocks, gold or property, it’s time to Keep it Halal with Wahed. We know how hard it can be to avoid interest in a society where we are surrounded by it. But together, we can reshape the future of finance — one that’s fairer, transparent, and built on trust. Visit Wahed to get started! Capital at Risk. Intended for UK audiences only. As with any investment, a Wahed Invest Ltd investment puts your money at risk, as the value of your investment can go down as well as up. If you are unsure about whether investing is right for you, please seek expert financial advice. Wahed Invest Ltd. is registered in England and Wales (Company No. 10829012), registered office: 87-89 Baker Street, London, W1U 6RJ, UK and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority: FRN 833225. Shariah compliance at Wahed is based on the certification and guidance of our Shariah governance body, the Shariyah Review Bureau (SRB). Interpretations may vary. For further details, please refer to our Shariah webpage.

When your wages do not increase at the same rate of the things we’re buying, its clear - we are in a cost of living crisis! Investing your money with Wahed gives it the opportunity to grow and work for you. And keeping your Money Halal is easy with Wahed - Whether you want to invest in stocks, gold or property, it’s time to Keep it Halal with Wahed. We know how hard it can be to avoid interest in a society where we are surrounded by it. But together, we can reshape the future of finance — one that’s fairer, transparent, and built on trust. Visit Wahed to get started! Capital at Risk. Intended for UK audiences only. As with any investment, a Wahed Invest Ltd investment puts your money at risk, as the value of your investment can go down as well as up. If you are unsure about whether investing is right for you, please seek expert financial advice. Wahed Invest Ltd. is registered in England and Wales (Company No. 10829012), registered office: 87-89 Baker Street, London, W1U 6RJ, UK and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority: FRN 833225. Shariah compliance at Wahed is based on the certification and guidance of our Shariah governance body, the Shariyah Review Bureau (SRB). Interpretations may vary. For further details, please refer to our Shariah webpage.

khabib nurmagomedov

329,651 次观看 • 1 年前

Breaking: If conditions of WAR change, so must we—enough is enough! America’s political leadership must be clear about the purpose of every conflict that puts our people, our security, and our resources at risk. What outcomes are we trying to achieve? What conditions would tell us the mission has succeeded? Who will verify those conditions? These are practical questions. In the Middle East, military action must serve a defined political objective along with a path to ending the fighting. In Europe, every American commitment should be measured against a realistic prospect for peace. We should know what we are asking our allies to do, what negotiations are meant to accomplish, and what would allow the United States to reduce its involvement responsibly. A strike can destroy a target. Another shipment can sustain a fight. Neither, by itself, tells us how a war ends. If circumstances change or the objective proves unreachable, we must have the discipline to reassess, and if necessary, change our course. Continuing along the same path because we have already invested so much is not a strategy. The American people deserve a clear account of what is at stake, what success requires, and what it will cost. Our men and women in uniform deserve to know that their service is tied to an achievable mission. We must be as determined in the pursuit of peace as we are in the conduct of war.

Breaking: If conditions of WAR change, so must we—enough is enough! America’s political leadership must be clear about the purpose of every conflict that puts our people, our security, and our resources at risk. What outcomes are we trying to achieve? What conditions would tell us the mission has succeeded? Who will verify those conditions? These are practical questions. In the Middle East, military action must serve a defined political objective along with a path to ending the fighting. In Europe, every American commitment should be measured against a realistic prospect for peace. We should know what we are asking our allies to do, what negotiations are meant to accomplish, and what would allow the United States to reduce its involvement responsibly. A strike can destroy a target. Another shipment can sustain a fight. Neither, by itself, tells us how a war ends. If circumstances change or the objective proves unreachable, we must have the discipline to reassess, and if necessary, change our course. Continuing along the same path because we have already invested so much is not a strategy. The American people deserve a clear account of what is at stake, what success requires, and what it will cost. Our men and women in uniform deserve to know that their service is tied to an achievable mission. We must be as determined in the pursuit of peace as we are in the conduct of war.

General Mike Flynn

71,302 次观看 • 8 天前

Some personal hot takes from AI: engineer Miami follows... 1. Software development is a dead-end profession because anyone can be a software developer now. 2. Anyone can use Cursor or any other tool and generate code. Being a coder and being a software engineer are different. 3. Computers used to be gated; now everyone has the power to make computers malleable. Everyone is a software developer now, but that does not mean they are software engineers 4. If you cannot demonstrate how a coding agent works, you are just a consumer and have imposed an artificial glass ceiling on your career as a software engineer. 5. If you are curious, you will have a job. If you have not been curious in the last two years, you are replaceable. 6. SaaS per-seat economics may become unstable as customers need fewer people to achieve results, prompting founders to think about new unit economics 7. Most companies will take two or three years (or more!) to figure out AI transformation. 8. Some companies are already building AI native teams of five to ten people who can build with the grain of AI 9. There will be an explosion in the number of software developers. Software development is now essentially free, and tokens are cheaper than humans 10. Not enough engineers know what it means to be a product engineer 11. JIRA ticket monkeys are cooked 12. If your company has banned AI, you should quit that company 13. AI is more like a musical instrument than just a tool play with it, make discoveries, build intuition learn where AI is good and where it fails

Some personal hot takes from AI: engineer Miami follows... 1. Software development is a dead-end profession because anyone can be a software developer now. 2. Anyone can use Cursor or any other tool and generate code. Being a coder and being a software engineer are different. 3. Computers used to be gated; now everyone has the power to make computers malleable. Everyone is a software developer now, but that does not mean they are software engineers 4. If you cannot demonstrate how a coding agent works, you are just a consumer and have imposed an artificial glass ceiling on your career as a software engineer. 5. If you are curious, you will have a job. If you have not been curious in the last two years, you are replaceable. 6. SaaS per-seat economics may become unstable as customers need fewer people to achieve results, prompting founders to think about new unit economics 7. Most companies will take two or three years (or more!) to figure out AI transformation. 8. Some companies are already building AI native teams of five to ten people who can build with the grain of AI 9. There will be an explosion in the number of software developers. Software development is now essentially free, and tokens are cheaper than humans 10. Not enough engineers know what it means to be a product engineer 11. JIRA ticket monkeys are cooked 12. If your company has banned AI, you should quit that company 13. AI is more like a musical instrument than just a tool play with it, make discoveries, build intuition learn where AI is good and where it fails

geoff

81,509 次观看 • 3 个月前

It would be easy to call out the defense for this one, but the issue is complete lack of game management. It’s been an issue for years and it must improve. There are 10-15 passes that second half where Utd really would have benefited from controlling the game more — but lose possession from bad decisions. Like, 60 minutes into the game when Everton has pinned us down in our own end and we are up 1-0, it is impossible to justify from a risk/reward perspective to try to make a low percentage pass in behind the defense to a Sesko running down towards the corner flag just after we have won possession. All United fans knows how it feels like when you are down a goal against City and they just play off 15-20 minutes. How can they be so good at it? Check the videos from the City documentary. I couldn’t find the best clip I’ve seen, but the below is a good example. Pep is absolutely losing his mind after players losing possession of the ball. In another video he literarily starts to cry. United doesn’t have to become City II. But this is an area we just must improve and it’s long long overdue. It really is as simple as this. If you are patient and get enough players up pitch — the opponent must defend with the same numbers. If you lose the ball in that position when the opponent is defending with 10 players in the lap of their keeper — it is very hard for an opponent to counter attack on you effectively. So you get every chance to win the ball back even if you lose it. When we have a lead in a game like this — we just can’t help ourselves. Give it 15 seconds and a Dalot or Maguire or Rashford or Bruno or Cunha or Mbuemo will try a play to get into a scoring chance. This must improve and it must improve soon.

It would be easy to call out the defense for this one, but the issue is complete lack of game management. It’s been an issue for years and it must improve. There are 10-15 passes that second half where Utd really would have benefited from controlling the game more — but lose possession from bad decisions. Like, 60 minutes into the game when Everton has pinned us down in our own end and we are up 1-0, it is impossible to justify from a risk/reward perspective to try to make a low percentage pass in behind the defense to a Sesko running down towards the corner flag just after we have won possession. All United fans knows how it feels like when you are down a goal against City and they just play off 15-20 minutes. How can they be so good at it? Check the videos from the City documentary. I couldn’t find the best clip I’ve seen, but the below is a good example. Pep is absolutely losing his mind after players losing possession of the ball. In another video he literarily starts to cry. United doesn’t have to become City II. But this is an area we just must improve and it’s long long overdue. It really is as simple as this. If you are patient and get enough players up pitch — the opponent must defend with the same numbers. If you lose the ball in that position when the opponent is defending with 10 players in the lap of their keeper — it is very hard for an opponent to counter attack on you effectively. So you get every chance to win the ball back even if you lose it. When we have a lead in a game like this — we just can’t help ourselves. Give it 15 seconds and a Dalot or Maguire or Rashford or Bruno or Cunha or Mbuemo will try a play to get into a scoring chance. This must improve and it must improve soon.

The Swedish Rumble 🔰

37,172 次观看 • 1 个月前

Know what to do before the market forces you to decide. 1. Before the trade — Should I trade? Is it a proven setup from your playbook? Does the market environment fit? Does the reward justify the risk? Do you have a clear invalidation level and the correct position size? Are you following your system, or do you just want action? If these don't align, pass. 2. At entry — What am I risking? Know your entry, stop, position size, initial $ risk, % of capital at risk, and your target or exit method. The chart determines the stop. The stop determines the position size. 3. After entry — Has anything actually changed? Is the setup still valid? Has your predetermined exit been reached? Has price action materially changed? Are you reacting to the chart or to your P&L? If nothing important has changed, don't invent a new decision. 4. When losing — Exit or hold? Hold only while your thesis and predefined risk remain valid. Exit when the stop is triggered, the setup is invalidated, market behavior violates your entry reason, or your risk limit is reached. Never turn a planned trade into an unplanned investment. 5. When winning — Exit or hold? Has the target been reached? Has the trailing stop triggered? Has the trend or setup weakened? Is there actual evidence to exit, or are you afraid of giving back profit? Let your exit rules manage the winner, not your emotions. 6. After the trade — What did I learn? Record the setup, entry, exit, risk, result in R, rule adherence, mistakes, a screenshot, and one lesson. Then separate two questions: did the strategy work, and did you execute it correctly? A losing trade can still be good execution. A winning trade can still involve bad execution. Make your important trading decisions before money is influencing your emotions.

Know what to do before the market forces you to decide. 1. Before the trade — Should I trade? Is it a proven setup from your playbook? Does the market environment fit? Does the reward justify the risk? Do you have a clear invalidation level and the correct position size? Are you following your system, or do you just want action? If these don't align, pass. 2. At entry — What am I risking? Know your entry, stop, position size, initial $ risk, % of capital at risk, and your target or exit method. The chart determines the stop. The stop determines the position size. 3. After entry — Has anything actually changed? Is the setup still valid? Has your predetermined exit been reached? Has price action materially changed? Are you reacting to the chart or to your P&L? If nothing important has changed, don't invent a new decision. 4. When losing — Exit or hold? Hold only while your thesis and predefined risk remain valid. Exit when the stop is triggered, the setup is invalidated, market behavior violates your entry reason, or your risk limit is reached. Never turn a planned trade into an unplanned investment. 5. When winning — Exit or hold? Has the target been reached? Has the trailing stop triggered? Has the trend or setup weakened? Is there actual evidence to exit, or are you afraid of giving back profit? Let your exit rules manage the winner, not your emotions. 6. After the trade — What did I learn? Record the setup, entry, exit, risk, result in R, rule adherence, mistakes, a screenshot, and one lesson. Then separate two questions: did the strategy work, and did you execute it correctly? A losing trade can still be good execution. A winning trade can still involve bad execution. Make your important trading decisions before money is influencing your emotions.

Scott Redler

28,210 次观看 • 13 天前

WHY AMBIENCE? The theme of this years Reboot Camp is: AMBIENCE - Manifesting the presence of God You might be wondering, “Why ambience?” When the bible uses the term “the presence of God”, there are three things it could be referring to: The first is the “Omnipresence of God” This means God is everywhere at once. David describing this said “Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence? If I ascend into heaven, You are there; If I make my bed in hell, behold, You are there.” (Psalm 139:7-8) The second is the “Indwelling presence of God” The is exclusive to the believer in Christ. It refers to us receiving the Holy Spirit at salvation. The third is the “Manifest presence of God” Whilst God is everywhere at once, based on his Omnipresence, He doesn't manifest everywhere. This is why Jacob could say “God was here and i did not know” (Genesis 28:16). He knew God was Omnipresent, but at a point in time, God chose to make his presence manifest in certain place. As a believer in Christ, not only are you to be familiar with the indwelling presence of God in you, but because God lives in you, His presence can be manifest through you as well. The Psalms let us know that because God dwelt in the midst of the Israelites, the sea saw it and fled, the Jordan was turned back and even the mountains skipped like rams (Psalm 114:1-4). Through the manifest presence of God, you can experience tangible miracles often. It isn’t exclusive to Men of God alone, you also can be a carrier of God’s presence! This is what God wants to do at this years Reboot Camp, He wants you to be an envoy of his ambience! Are you ready??

WHY AMBIENCE? The theme of this years Reboot Camp is: AMBIENCE - Manifesting the presence of God You might be wondering, “Why ambience?” When the bible uses the term “the presence of God”, there are three things it could be referring to: The first is the “Omnipresence of God” This means God is everywhere at once. David describing this said “Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence? If I ascend into heaven, You are there; If I make my bed in hell, behold, You are there.” (Psalm 139:7-8) The second is the “Indwelling presence of God” The is exclusive to the believer in Christ. It refers to us receiving the Holy Spirit at salvation. The third is the “Manifest presence of God” Whilst God is everywhere at once, based on his Omnipresence, He doesn't manifest everywhere. This is why Jacob could say “God was here and i did not know” (Genesis 28:16). He knew God was Omnipresent, but at a point in time, God chose to make his presence manifest in certain place. As a believer in Christ, not only are you to be familiar with the indwelling presence of God in you, but because God lives in you, His presence can be manifest through you as well. The Psalms let us know that because God dwelt in the midst of the Israelites, the sea saw it and fled, the Jordan was turned back and even the mountains skipped like rams (Psalm 114:1-4). Through the manifest presence of God, you can experience tangible miracles often. It isn’t exclusive to Men of God alone, you also can be a carrier of God’s presence! This is what God wants to do at this years Reboot Camp, He wants you to be an envoy of his ambience! Are you ready??

Apostle Emmanuel Iren

53,445 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨This video is disturbing… and everyone needs to watch what is happening. ICE agents are using tactics that are putting people in impossible situations. And if we don’t stop this escalation, more people are going to die. Kansas enacted the HALO Act, which makes it a crime for people to knowingly get within 25 feet of law enforcement officers performing certain duties. That may sound reasonable on paper. Until you see how ICE agents are weaponizing it. In this video, a public observer drove into an apartment complex parking lot. Once she was inside, ICE agents boxed her in with vehicles, and then began demanding that she move because she was supposedly within 25 feet of them. She tells them she is stuck. She explains she cannot move. The agent ignores her. He tells her to back up… but she tells him there is a vehicle behind her, and she cannot. She is trapped in a situation ICE created. Her options? Attempt to drive through agents and their unmarked vehicles… and risk them claiming she used her vehicle as a weapon. Or stay where she is… and risk being arrested. This is how people get hurt. Law enforcement is supposed to de-escalate situations… not create impossible choices where a U.S. citizen has to choose between an action that could get them arrested… or killed. And everyone needs to be paying attention to this. Because when government agents are given more power, fewer limits, and more ways to justify escalation, this doesn’t just end with immigrants. It creates a government where anyone can be trapped in an impossible situation… and where your rights only exist if the people with power decide to honor them.

🚨This video is disturbing… and everyone needs to watch what is happening. ICE agents are using tactics that are putting people in impossible situations. And if we don’t stop this escalation, more people are going to die. Kansas enacted the HALO Act, which makes it a crime for people to knowingly get within 25 feet of law enforcement officers performing certain duties. That may sound reasonable on paper. Until you see how ICE agents are weaponizing it. In this video, a public observer drove into an apartment complex parking lot. Once she was inside, ICE agents boxed her in with vehicles, and then began demanding that she move because she was supposedly within 25 feet of them. She tells them she is stuck. She explains she cannot move. The agent ignores her. He tells her to back up… but she tells him there is a vehicle behind her, and she cannot. She is trapped in a situation ICE created. Her options? Attempt to drive through agents and their unmarked vehicles… and risk them claiming she used her vehicle as a weapon. Or stay where she is… and risk being arrested. This is how people get hurt. Law enforcement is supposed to de-escalate situations… not create impossible choices where a U.S. citizen has to choose between an action that could get them arrested… or killed. And everyone needs to be paying attention to this. Because when government agents are given more power, fewer limits, and more ways to justify escalation, this doesn’t just end with immigrants. It creates a government where anyone can be trapped in an impossible situation… and where your rights only exist if the people with power decide to honor them.

Jesus Freakin Congress

190,614 次观看 • 2 个月前

Everybody is obsessed with song ads right now. They retain attention. They get cheap clicks. They can absolutely crush CPA. But cheap acquisition and great acquisition are two different things. A catchy song can drag almost anyone through an ad. Repetition, music, absurdity… it hijacks attention extremely well. Drama does it differently. Conflict. Tension. Characters. An unanswered question. You’re still getting insane retention, but now someone is staying because they’re mentally invested in what’s happening. They want to know what happens next. And that gives you something a song ad doesn’t always give you: time to build the problem, introduce the product and make someone actually understand WHY they should care. That’s where I think customer quality starts to separate. One format can be incredible at generating cheap first purchases. The other has the potential to generate customers who actually understand what they bought, why they bought it and why they should keep buying it. That distinction matters when you look past Day 1. I have zero problem going 1:1 CAC to COGS. But here’s the part people are missing: 1:1 isn’t the metric to optimize for. The lifecycle of that customer is. If you’re acquiring customers cheap but they never reorder, never subscribe, never buy another product and disappear after Day 1, you didn’t discover some magical acquisition strategy. You literally just bought revenue. If a company spends $50 acquiring a customer on a $50 product and that customer becomes worth $200, they’ll buy as many of those customers as you can give them. Finding MORE of those people is where creative matters. CPA tells you how efficiently you got someone through the door. LTV tells you whether you got the RIGHT person through the door. So when I see people calling 1:1 CAC/revenue AI song ads “the future,” I think they’re optimizing for the wrong thing. The future isn’t whoever can manufacture attention the cheapest. It’s whoever can turn attention into actual investment in the product and brand. That’s why I’m betting heavily on drama. Songs can make people stay. Drama can make people care. And I think over time, LTV is going to show just how big that difference is.

Franky Shaw

1,283,991 次观看 • 24 天前

📺 $TSLA JUST FLASHED A BUY SIGNAL... BUT THERE'S A CATCH Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla may have just flashed a short-term buy signal, but the bigger picture hasn't changed. After breaking below the critical 16-month channel support at $373.37 following disappointing earnings, Tesla triggered a major long-term sell signal. That breakdown pointed to an initial downside target in the $291.81-$300.90 area, and that objective has now been achieved. This support zone is doing exactly what it was expected to do: slow the decline and create conditions for a tradable rebound. * As the descending channel support continues to move lower, it is converging with the wave-count support around $291.81, creating an increasingly important technical floor. This is considered "bottom-picking territory," where buyers may begin accumulating shares and where selling pressure could remain contained through August. * The key level to watch today is $316.86. This former long-term trendline has become the most important short-term resistance. A weekly close above $316.86 would signal improving momentum and likely confirm the start of a multi-week recovery. If that breakout occurs, the first upside objective becomes $353.74 over the next two to three weeks. After testing strong support in the upper $290s and low $300s, a rebound toward that resistance level would be a typical technical move. Swing traders may view this as an opportunity to participate in the recovery while planning to take profits near the target. * The rally could eventually extend even further toward the former channel support at $373.37 within three to five weeks. Because #TSLA gapped sharply below that level after earnings without ever retesting it, it remains a major technical pivot that price may revisit before making its next significant move. However, there's an important catch. We don't believe that this rebound marks the beginning of a new bull market. Instead, it is viewed as a counter-trend rally inside a larger bearish structure. Even if Tesla rallies back toward $353 or $373, those levels may become opportunities to reduce exposure or initiate new short positions rather than chase higher prices. * The long-term outlook remains bearish as long as Tesla stays below $373.37. The broader technical target continues to be the $220s by year-end, with the recent rebound simply representing a pause within that larger downtrend. There is also a clear downside invalidation level. * If Tesla instead closes the week below $291.81, the bullish rebound thesis fails. In that scenario, selling accelerates toward approximately $271 over the following days, with $227.47 becoming the primary target by the end of September. The key takeaway is that the technical outlook depends entirely on the timeframe. In the short term, Tesla is constructive above the $300 support zone and becomes significantly more bullish with a weekly close above $316.86, targeting $353.74 and potentially $373.37 over the coming weeks. But over the longer term, we still view any recovery as temporary while the stock remains below the major breakdown level at $373.37. * Watch the full $TSLA analysis for July 31, 2026 in this short video🔽

📺 $TSLA JUST FLASHED A BUY SIGNAL... BUT THERE'S A CATCH Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla may have just flashed a short-term buy signal, but the bigger picture hasn't changed. After breaking below the critical 16-month channel support at $373.37 following disappointing earnings, Tesla triggered a major long-term sell signal. That breakdown pointed to an initial downside target in the $291.81-$300.90 area, and that objective has now been achieved. This support zone is doing exactly what it was expected to do: slow the decline and create conditions for a tradable rebound. * As the descending channel support continues to move lower, it is converging with the wave-count support around $291.81, creating an increasingly important technical floor. This is considered "bottom-picking territory," where buyers may begin accumulating shares and where selling pressure could remain contained through August. * The key level to watch today is $316.86. This former long-term trendline has become the most important short-term resistance. A weekly close above $316.86 would signal improving momentum and likely confirm the start of a multi-week recovery. If that breakout occurs, the first upside objective becomes $353.74 over the next two to three weeks. After testing strong support in the upper $290s and low $300s, a rebound toward that resistance level would be a typical technical move. Swing traders may view this as an opportunity to participate in the recovery while planning to take profits near the target. * The rally could eventually extend even further toward the former channel support at $373.37 within three to five weeks. Because #TSLA gapped sharply below that level after earnings without ever retesting it, it remains a major technical pivot that price may revisit before making its next significant move. However, there's an important catch. We don't believe that this rebound marks the beginning of a new bull market. Instead, it is viewed as a counter-trend rally inside a larger bearish structure. Even if Tesla rallies back toward $353 or $373, those levels may become opportunities to reduce exposure or initiate new short positions rather than chase higher prices. * The long-term outlook remains bearish as long as Tesla stays below $373.37. The broader technical target continues to be the $220s by year-end, with the recent rebound simply representing a pause within that larger downtrend. There is also a clear downside invalidation level. * If Tesla instead closes the week below $291.81, the bullish rebound thesis fails. In that scenario, selling accelerates toward approximately $271 over the following days, with $227.47 becoming the primary target by the end of September. The key takeaway is that the technical outlook depends entirely on the timeframe. In the short term, Tesla is constructive above the $300 support zone and becomes significantly more bullish with a weekly close above $316.86, targeting $353.74 and potentially $373.37 over the coming weeks. But over the longer term, we still view any recovery as temporary while the stock remains below the major breakdown level at $373.37. * Watch the full $TSLA analysis for July 31, 2026 in this short video🔽

Wicked Stocks

10,762 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 I WARNED YOU. RIGHT BEFORE THIS DUMP. But most people ignored it. And now the crash is here. Bitcoin dropped to $70K. Over $500M in longs wiped out in hours. Many hope this is just a temporary correction. But the macro tells a different story: PPI just jumped to 6%. The fastest pace since COVID. That killed any hope of rate cuts. And to make things worse, Fed Chair Warsh is hawkish: Higher-for-longer rates and balance sheet shrinkage. 10Y yields above 4.6%. Capital is flowing out of risk assets. Spot ETF outflows are at historic highs. The crowd is praying for a quick bounce. They will be deeply disappointed. This is just the beginning of the real move down. Most people will realize it only when it's too late. For the record: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 I WARNED YOU. RIGHT BEFORE THIS DUMP. But most people ignored it. And now the crash is here. Bitcoin dropped to $70K. Over $500M in longs wiped out in hours. Many hope this is just a temporary correction. But the macro tells a different story: PPI just jumped to 6%. The fastest pace since COVID. That killed any hope of rate cuts. And to make things worse, Fed Chair Warsh is hawkish: Higher-for-longer rates and balance sheet shrinkage. 10Y yields above 4.6%. Capital is flowing out of risk assets. Spot ETF outflows are at historic highs. The crowd is praying for a quick bounce. They will be deeply disappointed. This is just the beginning of the real move down. Most people will realize it only when it's too late. For the record: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

287,308 次观看 • 4 个月前

#WATCH | Chandigarh: On Congress leader Shama Mohamed's comments on Rohit Sharma, former Indian cricketer Yograj Singh said, "... The people of our country cannot say bad about our players and our countrymen while living in this country... If anyone sitting in the political system speaks about those players who have given pride to this country for so many years... then they should be ashamed. Such people have no right to live in this country... Cricket is our religion... Whoever is the MP,... that woman is like our mother or a daughter, whom we respect... But this is like a mother killing her son after giving birth, a sister breaking her brother's Rakhi after tying it, and a daughter throwing her father out of the house. This is what this feels like... Action should be taken... Nobody has the right to talk against one's countrymen and sportsmen. This should never be tolerated and those who are doing this should be ashamed to make it a political issue... If I were the prime minister, I would have asked her to pack her bags and leave the country... The Prime Minister should ask her to either apologize or leave the country... If it were a man, I would have talked in another tone and have explained it in Punjabi or in Hindi or any language... But she is equal to a daughter, what shall I say to her..."

#WATCH | Chandigarh: On Congress leader Shama Mohamed's comments on Rohit Sharma, former Indian cricketer Yograj Singh said, "... The people of our country cannot say bad about our players and our countrymen while living in this country... If anyone sitting in the political system speaks about those players who have given pride to this country for so many years... then they should be ashamed. Such people have no right to live in this country... Cricket is our religion... Whoever is the MP,... that woman is like our mother or a daughter, whom we respect... But this is like a mother killing her son after giving birth, a sister breaking her brother's Rakhi after tying it, and a daughter throwing her father out of the house. This is what this feels like... Action should be taken... Nobody has the right to talk against one's countrymen and sportsmen. This should never be tolerated and those who are doing this should be ashamed to make it a political issue... If I were the prime minister, I would have asked her to pack her bags and leave the country... The Prime Minister should ask her to either apologize or leave the country... If it were a man, I would have talked in another tone and have explained it in Punjabi or in Hindi or any language... But she is equal to a daughter, what shall I say to her..."

ANI

324,724 次观看 • 1 年前

In 2006, Al Gore warned of a "tipping point" where climate doom was inescapable in 10 years. 20 years later, with multiple failed predictions he's still warning of climate doom -- just pushing the clock further back so he, now at age 78, won't be around to answer when they again fail to come true. At a "Sustainability in Entertainment Honors" event in Hollywood, Gore cites the plot of The Day After Tomorrow -- where the Gulf Stream fails and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) ceases -- and warns "this is a very real threat within the next 25 years." The West Wing actor Bradley Whitford tries to shorten the timeline, suggesting that "we're in an ice age in, like, 10 years," but Gore quickly shuts him down: "No, no, no. It would take longer." "But there are other tipping points, as well, that are as immediate as that," he continues, sharing a W.H.O. prediction of 1 billion "climate migrants" in 24 years. And, rather than worrying about what those migrants might do to the host communities they enter, Gore frets about the "heightened risk of xenophobia" that comes from "too much too quickly." "If a few million migrants from the Eastern Mediterranean into Hungary and central Europe caused Orbán and contributed to Trump... can we even imagine what 1 billion climate migrants might cause? We could see dire threats to our capacity for self-governance in the chaos."

In 2006, Al Gore warned of a "tipping point" where climate doom was inescapable in 10 years. 20 years later, with multiple failed predictions he's still warning of climate doom -- just pushing the clock further back so he, now at age 78, won't be around to answer when they again fail to come true. At a "Sustainability in Entertainment Honors" event in Hollywood, Gore cites the plot of The Day After Tomorrow -- where the Gulf Stream fails and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) ceases -- and warns "this is a very real threat within the next 25 years." The West Wing actor Bradley Whitford tries to shorten the timeline, suggesting that "we're in an ice age in, like, 10 years," but Gore quickly shuts him down: "No, no, no. It would take longer." "But there are other tipping points, as well, that are as immediate as that," he continues, sharing a W.H.O. prediction of 1 billion "climate migrants" in 24 years. And, rather than worrying about what those migrants might do to the host communities they enter, Gore frets about the "heightened risk of xenophobia" that comes from "too much too quickly." "If a few million migrants from the Eastern Mediterranean into Hungary and central Europe caused Orbán and contributed to Trump... can we even imagine what 1 billion climate migrants might cause? We could see dire threats to our capacity for self-governance in the chaos."

Breitbart News

153,252 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 I WARNED YOU. RIGHT BEFORE THIS DUMP. But most people ignored it. And now the crash is here. Bitcoin dropped to $68K. Over $500M in longs wiped out in hours. Many hope this is just a temporary correction. They are wrong. May just closed in red after two straight green monthly candles. Since 2011, Bitcoin has NEVER printed 3 green monthly candles in a row during a Bear Cycle. The same setup appeared in 2012, 2014, 2018, 2022, and now again in 2026. Both times, a new Bull Trup followed. But the macro tells an even worse story: PPI just jumped to 6%. The fastest pace since COVID. That killed any hope of rate cuts. And to make things worse, Fed Chair Warsh is hawkish: Higher-for-longer rates and balance sheet shrinkage. 10Y yields above 4.6%. Capital is flowing out of risk assets. Spot ETF outflows are at historic highs. The crowd is praying for a quick bounce. They will be deeply disappointed. This is just the beginning of the real move down. Most people will realize it only when it's too late. I’ve been in finance for more than 15 years. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll say it here publicly, like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 I WARNED YOU. RIGHT BEFORE THIS DUMP. But most people ignored it. And now the crash is here. Bitcoin dropped to $68K. Over $500M in longs wiped out in hours. Many hope this is just a temporary correction. They are wrong. May just closed in red after two straight green monthly candles. Since 2011, Bitcoin has NEVER printed 3 green monthly candles in a row during a Bear Cycle. The same setup appeared in 2012, 2014, 2018, 2022, and now again in 2026. Both times, a new Bull Trup followed. But the macro tells an even worse story: PPI just jumped to 6%. The fastest pace since COVID. That killed any hope of rate cuts. And to make things worse, Fed Chair Warsh is hawkish: Higher-for-longer rates and balance sheet shrinkage. 10Y yields above 4.6%. Capital is flowing out of risk assets. Spot ETF outflows are at historic highs. The crowd is praying for a quick bounce. They will be deeply disappointed. This is just the beginning of the real move down. Most people will realize it only when it's too late. I’ve been in finance for more than 15 years. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll say it here publicly, like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

DANNY

67,588 次观看 • 4 个月前