Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

exposed & caught - seen by several strangers while jerking my XXL | Public thrill at its best! 😈 💦 Full video -> Gay public exhibitionist Exhib Public #exhibitionist #gayexhib #publicexposed #nakedinpublic #gaypublic #teamexhib #exposedboy #publicnck

publicnck's profile picture

Young XXL Exhib Boy 30k 😈🔞

32,372 subscribers

41,201 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#exhibitionist#gayexhib#publicexposed#nakedinpublic#gaypublic#teamexhib#exposedboy#publicnck
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING: VIDEO FOOTAGE FROM THE TRACK MEET WHERE KARMELO ANTHONY STABBED AUSTIN METCALF HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM PUBLIC VIEWING AFTER A RECORD REQUESTER NAMED ADRIENNE BEAUCHAMP CRIMINALLY ATTEMPTED TO LIVESTREAM THE FOOTAGE ON TIKTOK. According to a statement released by Frisco ISD - On July 16, 2025 several Public Information Act requesters were scheduled to review the footage under the supervision of Ms. Michelle Arellano, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent. During one such scheduled viewing, two requesters completed their check-in, were escorted outside the viewing area and were asked to deposit their personal communication devices. Viewing instructions were then provided and the viewers reviewed and signed their acknowledgment of the non-recording parameters required for viewing. While screening the video surveillance footage, the District Administration Building’s front desk receptionist received a call from a member of the public stating that someone was livestreaming their video footage review. The front desk receptionist then messaged Ms. Arellano to inform her of the reported violation of video footage review protocols. Ms. Arellano then informed Dr. Waldrip, Superintendent of Schools, of the report. Dr. Waldrip entered the viewing room and asked if anyone present was recording. Both requesters denied recording. Because of the reported violation of security protocols, the Public Information Act requesters were asked to leave the building. Soon thereafter, the District’s Communications Department learned that one of the viewers was livestreaming from K Stadium. In the livestream, the Public Information Act requester could be seen walking around K Stadium and pointing out where District security cameras were mounted on the stadium structures. She further discussed that she knew where the cameras were located based on her review of the Record. Later the same day, a Public Information Act requester was reported to be in a livestream discussion forum talking about her onsite review of the Record. During the livestreamed discussion forum, the Public Information Act requester admitted to hiding a recording device in her pocket and continuing to record while viewing the video footage despite being told by District staff that such recording was not permitted. She stated that she planned to request to review the Record again and would attempt to gather even more information than she was able to collect on July 16, 2025 through whatever means available. In the thread, I will share the full file of documents released by Frisco ISD, as well as multiple screenshots from the live. (Without showing any of the video). Please keep in mind, this video has been debated over for weeks and narratives/lies have been spread about what can and cannot be seen in the video. The video, which has been a hot topic on social media, contains neither personally identifiable imagery of students nor law enforcement information when viewed in its original form. The surveillance video, without zoom or other video enhancement, shows a distant view of bleachers at K Stadium and the movements of various parties. The original video depicts images that can be recognized as people but, due to their size, the individuals CANNOT be individually identified. I have requested a copy of the police report regarding this incident.
1:30

BREAKING: VIDEO FOOTAGE FROM THE TRACK MEET WHERE KARMELO ANTHONY STABBED AUSTIN METCALF HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM PUBLIC VIEWING AFTER A RECORD REQUESTER NAMED ADRIENNE BEAUCHAMP CRIMINALLY ATTEMPTED TO LIVESTREAM THE FOOTAGE ON TIKTOK. According to a statement released by Frisco ISD - On July 16, 2025 several Public Information Act requesters were scheduled to review the footage under the supervision of Ms. Michelle Arellano, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent. During one such scheduled viewing, two requesters completed their check-in, were escorted outside the viewing area and were asked to deposit their personal communication devices. Viewing instructions were then provided and the viewers reviewed and signed their acknowledgment of the non-recording parameters required for viewing. While screening the video surveillance footage, the District Administration Building’s front desk receptionist received a call from a member of the public stating that someone was livestreaming their video footage review. The front desk receptionist then messaged Ms. Arellano to inform her of the reported violation of video footage review protocols. Ms. Arellano then informed Dr. Waldrip, Superintendent of Schools, of the report. Dr. Waldrip entered the viewing room and asked if anyone present was recording. Both requesters denied recording. Because of the reported violation of security protocols, the Public Information Act requesters were asked to leave the building. Soon thereafter, the District’s Communications Department learned that one of the viewers was livestreaming from K Stadium. In the livestream, the Public Information Act requester could be seen walking around K Stadium and pointing out where District security cameras were mounted on the stadium structures. She further discussed that she knew where the cameras were located based on her review of the Record. Later the same day, a Public Information Act requester was reported to be in a livestream discussion forum talking about her onsite review of the Record. During the livestreamed discussion forum, the Public Information Act requester admitted to hiding a recording device in her pocket and continuing to record while viewing the video footage despite being told by District staff that such recording was not permitted. She stated that she planned to request to review the Record again and would attempt to gather even more information than she was able to collect on July 16, 2025 through whatever means available. In the thread, I will share the full file of documents released by Frisco ISD, as well as multiple screenshots from the live. (Without showing any of the video). Please keep in mind, this video has been debated over for weeks and narratives/lies have been spread about what can and cannot be seen in the video. The video, which has been a hot topic on social media, contains neither personally identifiable imagery of students nor law enforcement information when viewed in its original form. The surveillance video, without zoom or other video enhancement, shows a distant view of bleachers at K Stadium and the movements of various parties. The original video depicts images that can be recognized as people but, due to their size, the individuals CANNOT be individually identified. I have requested a copy of the police report regarding this incident.

Sarah Fields

93,347 просмотров • 1 год назад

A lot of people are upset about these images of violent protesters in Los Angeles waving the Mexican flag. If they love Mexico so much, why are they so upset at enforcing our laws against illegal entry? To fully appreciate their significance, it’s important to understand that, over the last several decades, the people who run California and its major cities came to a new consensus: a large number of our laws were racist and oppressive. Democrats increasingly viewed laws against illegal camping, open-air drug dealing, shoplifting, burglary, arson, and unlawful border crossing not as tools for protecting neighborhoods and preserving public space but rather as tools for putting poor people and racial minorities in prison. The idea took root that order itself was a façade, a way for the rich and comfortable to criminalize the marginalized. So, one by one, Democrats stopped enforcing and weakened laws against drug dealing, illegal camping, prostitution, public defecation, and drug use on sidewalks. Cities stopped enforcing anti-camping ordinances. State leaders directed prosecutors not to charge certain drug crimes. Federal immigration laws were nullified by city policy. In the name of compassion, progressives dismantled the foundations of public order. Over the last few days, we’ve seen the consequences of this ideology erupt in the streets of Los Angeles. Protesters attacked federal agents during ICE operations, hurled bricks and fireworks at officers, torched vehicles, and defaced public buildings. All of it was filmed, cheered, and amplified on social media.... These weren’t quiet acts of nonviolent protest. We don’t know whether all the protesters were American citizens, and I am on the record vigorously defending the rights of the accused, including due process for those in the country illegally. But just as I believe the government must obey the constitution I also believe people must obey the law and our leaders must enforce it. And yet California’s leaders not only did not defend the law, they condemned those who tried. Governor Gavin Newsom called the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to restore order “purposefully inflammatory.” Mayor Karen Bass said, “We will not stand for this,” referring not to the attacks on police officers or destruction of public property, but to the federal response. She reaffirmed her administration’s ties to immigrant advocacy groups and made clear her allegiance was with the protesters, not with the law. What’s truly inflammatory is not sending in the Guard. It is standing by while mobs pelt law enforcement with bricks and fireworks, then accusing those officers of oppression. It is watching public spaces descend into chaos while calling the enforcement of laws the problem... If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, watch the full video, and read the rest of the story!
7:42

A lot of people are upset about these images of violent protesters in Los Angeles waving the Mexican flag. If they love Mexico so much, why are they so upset at enforcing our laws against illegal entry? To fully appreciate their significance, it’s important to understand that, over the last several decades, the people who run California and its major cities came to a new consensus: a large number of our laws were racist and oppressive. Democrats increasingly viewed laws against illegal camping, open-air drug dealing, shoplifting, burglary, arson, and unlawful border crossing not as tools for protecting neighborhoods and preserving public space but rather as tools for putting poor people and racial minorities in prison. The idea took root that order itself was a façade, a way for the rich and comfortable to criminalize the marginalized. So, one by one, Democrats stopped enforcing and weakened laws against drug dealing, illegal camping, prostitution, public defecation, and drug use on sidewalks. Cities stopped enforcing anti-camping ordinances. State leaders directed prosecutors not to charge certain drug crimes. Federal immigration laws were nullified by city policy. In the name of compassion, progressives dismantled the foundations of public order. Over the last few days, we’ve seen the consequences of this ideology erupt in the streets of Los Angeles. Protesters attacked federal agents during ICE operations, hurled bricks and fireworks at officers, torched vehicles, and defaced public buildings. All of it was filmed, cheered, and amplified on social media.... These weren’t quiet acts of nonviolent protest. We don’t know whether all the protesters were American citizens, and I am on the record vigorously defending the rights of the accused, including due process for those in the country illegally. But just as I believe the government must obey the constitution I also believe people must obey the law and our leaders must enforce it. And yet California’s leaders not only did not defend the law, they condemned those who tried. Governor Gavin Newsom called the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to restore order “purposefully inflammatory.” Mayor Karen Bass said, “We will not stand for this,” referring not to the attacks on police officers or destruction of public property, but to the federal response. She reaffirmed her administration’s ties to immigrant advocacy groups and made clear her allegiance was with the protesters, not with the law. What’s truly inflammatory is not sending in the Guard. It is standing by while mobs pelt law enforcement with bricks and fireworks, then accusing those officers of oppression. It is watching public spaces descend into chaos while calling the enforcement of laws the problem... If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, watch the full video, and read the rest of the story!

Michael Shellenberger

1,258,779 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨BOMBSHELL: Arizona Public Records EXPOSE TPUSA'S SHADY DONOR TRUST SETUP – Time For A Full AUDIT 🚨 Right now, as TPUSA faces total implosion after their horrible management in the wake of Charlie Kirk's untimely death, these fresh filings demand answers. Arizona public records confirm: The Vail Trust, managed by Gregory and Lori Vail, explicitly lists Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and The Heritage Foundation as its EXCLUSIVE beneficiaries – straight from signed disclosure forms under A.R.S. § 33-404. Watch the video: June 2025 notarized warranty deed shows property in Maricopa County transferred from The Vail Trust to the Don Hubble Living Trust. Clear asset movement in a trust that names TPUSA as sole heir alongside Heritage. This drops RIGHT after Charlie's death – highlighting the massive donor ties keeping TPUSA's reported $400 million legacy afloat while big conservative backers "recommit." But where's the transparency? Donor money flowing through private trusts... while TPUSA operates with zero public insight into how it's all connected? Charlie Kirk built TPUSA into a powerhouse, but his dying wish was reportedly a full DOGE-style audit – total transparency, cut the waste, expose everything. We demand TPUSA honor Charlie's legacy NOW: Open the books completely. I ndependent, DOGE-level audit of ALL funds, trusts, and beneficiary flows. No more hiding behind notarized deeds and private trusts. Donors deserve to know exactly where their money is going. Patriots deserve an organization that lives up to Charlie's vision – not one shrouded in opacity. TPUSA is at a crossroads. Implosion or rebirth? Honor Charlie. Audit it all. Another great investigative find by my man Travis, Make sure you're FOLLOWING Him! The truth can't stay hidden. Share this everywhere. 🔥
0:25

🚨BOMBSHELL: Arizona Public Records EXPOSE TPUSA'S SHADY DONOR TRUST SETUP – Time For A Full AUDIT 🚨 Right now, as TPUSA faces total implosion after their horrible management in the wake of Charlie Kirk's untimely death, these fresh filings demand answers. Arizona public records confirm: The Vail Trust, managed by Gregory and Lori Vail, explicitly lists Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and The Heritage Foundation as its EXCLUSIVE beneficiaries – straight from signed disclosure forms under A.R.S. § 33-404. Watch the video: June 2025 notarized warranty deed shows property in Maricopa County transferred from The Vail Trust to the Don Hubble Living Trust. Clear asset movement in a trust that names TPUSA as sole heir alongside Heritage. This drops RIGHT after Charlie's death – highlighting the massive donor ties keeping TPUSA's reported $400 million legacy afloat while big conservative backers "recommit." But where's the transparency? Donor money flowing through private trusts... while TPUSA operates with zero public insight into how it's all connected? Charlie Kirk built TPUSA into a powerhouse, but his dying wish was reportedly a full DOGE-style audit – total transparency, cut the waste, expose everything. We demand TPUSA honor Charlie's legacy NOW: Open the books completely. I ndependent, DOGE-level audit of ALL funds, trusts, and beneficiary flows. No more hiding behind notarized deeds and private trusts. Donors deserve to know exactly where their money is going. Patriots deserve an organization that lives up to Charlie's vision – not one shrouded in opacity. TPUSA is at a crossroads. Implosion or rebirth? Honor Charlie. Audit it all. Another great investigative find by my man Travis, Make sure you're FOLLOWING Him! The truth can't stay hidden. Share this everywhere. 🔥

Project Constitution

128,140 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I’m posting this video compilation and explanation to document contradictions and moral/ethical inconsistencies in how Kirk Cameron has handled public criticism following his promotion of annihilationism, and to publicly call him to repent - not so much for his false and dangerous beliefs about hell, but about how he has sinfully responded to disagreement and correction. This became necessary after Kirk went to CBN (a platform that has promoted Benny Hinn, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Copeland, T.D. Jakes, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, Todd White, Bill Johnson, etc.) to whitewash the record and level accusations against his brothers yet again. This is not about tone, personality, or online drama. It is about accountability for public teaching. Before anything else, I want to be clear about what I am and am not saying. I am not accusing Kirk Cameron of being an unbeliever. I am not claiming he is outside the faith. I am not “outing” him as something other than a brother in Christ. And although I believe annihilationism is a formal theological heresy, I am not declaring Kirk himself to be a heretic. I do not know him personally. My concern is not personal animus, but repentance where error exists, and more broadly, the integrity of Christian engagement with one another online, which must be governed by Scripture even when that engagement is difficult or uncomfortable. Because Protestia was the original “heresy hunter” website that drew 3rd-party attention to Kirk's podcast, I also want to clarify something plainly. Protestia accurately characterized and quoted Kirk. We did not rebuke him. We did not accuse him of heresy. We did not editorialize on his theology. We quoted his words directly, provided clips, and linked to his full podcast. Our reporting brought the issue into the open, led to dozens, if not hundreds, of corrective sermons around the country, as well as men like Albert Mohler, Justin Peters, Ray Comfort, and Todd Friel providing lengthy, corrective responses. In response to Kirk's rebuke of "sin sniffers" and "heresy hunters," looking for people to attack so our "ministries don't dry up," it must be said that neither Protestia nor I, as its publisher, earn any profit from this work. I operate without a salary, without ad profit tied to outrage, and without financial incentive to manufacture controversy. We also publish a clear, accessible set of doctrinal and editorial standards that invite accountability. Readers are encouraged to evaluate our reporting against those standards at any time. With sadness, I report the following ongoing hypocricies, errors, and sins, call for public repentance, and call on fellow public Christian ministers who confirm the public witness of the evidence to call Kirk to repentance as well: First, Kirk repeatedly characterizes annihilationism as a secondary issue, something Christians may disagree on without serious consequence. Yet in Episode 86, he frames the potential error of teaching ECTorment as a first-tier moral offense, calling it a “severe misrepresentation of God’s character” and “a great sin and mistake.” In effect, annihilationism’s potential error is treated as second-tier, while ECT’s potential error is framed as first-tier. His critics are condemned for strong language, even though his own framing assigns a clear double standard. Second, Kirk continues to publicly accuse unnamed brothers of unspecified sins against him. He speaks of “sin sniffers,” “heresy hunters,” and brothers behaving like unbelievers, yet never names who supposedly sinned or what sin was committed. Scripture does not authorize anonymous moral indictment. Accusation without identification prevents repentance, response, or clarification. Third, Kirk makes public claims about what Scripture teaches, on a public platform, for a mass audience, while insisting that responses to those claims must occur privately. This is incoherent. Public teaching creates public responsibility. A teacher cannot embrace the delegated authority of public instruction while exempting himself from open, public evaluation. Fourth, in the CBN interview, Kirk reframes the controversy as a surprising overreaction to an off-the-cuff question from his son. The episode itself shows otherwise. Episode 86 was planned, structured, cited, and presented as a “dangerous conversation.” He named specific theological positions, referenced Edward Fudge, and declared a personal conclusion. This was not accidental commentary, and it was not unexpected that it would draw strong reaction. Fifth, Kirk gives contradictory explanations for how he formed his beliefs. In attempting to minimize the doctrinal seriousness of ECT, he says he held to it only because of tradition, then says "verses" brought him to it, and continues to insinuate that ECT proponents today rely on tradition rather than Scripture. Sixth, Kirk repeatedly accuses online critics of illegitimate financial motives, claiming their analysis and arguments were driven by clicks, outrage, or income. At the same time, he presents his own financial concerns, canceled events, and lost opportunities as legitimate considerations. Financial motive is treated as sinful when attributed to others and understandable when attributed to himself. Seventh, Kirk appealed to many ECT teachers as fellow serious scriptural scholars, yet only listed figures who had passed away and could neither reject his conclusions nor correct his use of their authority. Living theologians who object are portrayed as divisive; dead ones are cited as allies. Eighth, Kirk openly admits that he wants annihilationism to be true, calls it a “great relief,” and imagines the joy of presenting annihilationism as "good news" to unbelievers who reject a God who eternally punishes. This is not a neutral inquiry. It is not merely "asking questions." It is doctrinal modification shaped by emotional desires - precisely the method Scripture warns against. Scripture does not require private confrontation before public correction when the teaching itself was public. Matthew 18 governs private interpersonal sin, not public doctrine. When error is public, correction must be public for the sake of those who heard it. Paul rebuked Peter publicly because the error was public. Elders are commanded to refute false teaching openly. Demanding private correction for public doctrine protects the teacher while leaving the audience confused. That is not loving. It prioritizes reputation over truth and the flock over no one. Public correction is not unchristian. It is biblical. It protects those exposed to error and provides clarity rather than silence. Jesus’ parable in Luke 16 about stewardship applies here. Teachers are not owners of doctrine; they are stewards of it. The steward is condemned not for dishonesty alone, but for handling what belonged to another according to his own preferences. Doctrine is not ours to reshape according to emotional comfort or perceived evangelistic usefulness. Faithfulness, not palatability, is the measure of stewardship. The gospel cannot be separated from what Christ saves us from. Hell is not a minor doctrine, and it is not ours to soften for relief or rhetorical safety. This video is not about malice. It is about accountability, witness, and loving a brother enough to call him out.
12:12

I’m posting this video compilation and explanation to document contradictions and moral/ethical inconsistencies in how Kirk Cameron has handled public criticism following his promotion of annihilationism, and to publicly call him to repent - not so much for his false and dangerous beliefs about hell, but about how he has sinfully responded to disagreement and correction. This became necessary after Kirk went to CBN (a platform that has promoted Benny Hinn, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Copeland, T.D. Jakes, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, Todd White, Bill Johnson, etc.) to whitewash the record and level accusations against his brothers yet again. This is not about tone, personality, or online drama. It is about accountability for public teaching. Before anything else, I want to be clear about what I am and am not saying. I am not accusing Kirk Cameron of being an unbeliever. I am not claiming he is outside the faith. I am not “outing” him as something other than a brother in Christ. And although I believe annihilationism is a formal theological heresy, I am not declaring Kirk himself to be a heretic. I do not know him personally. My concern is not personal animus, but repentance where error exists, and more broadly, the integrity of Christian engagement with one another online, which must be governed by Scripture even when that engagement is difficult or uncomfortable. Because Protestia was the original “heresy hunter” website that drew 3rd-party attention to Kirk's podcast, I also want to clarify something plainly. Protestia accurately characterized and quoted Kirk. We did not rebuke him. We did not accuse him of heresy. We did not editorialize on his theology. We quoted his words directly, provided clips, and linked to his full podcast. Our reporting brought the issue into the open, led to dozens, if not hundreds, of corrective sermons around the country, as well as men like Albert Mohler, Justin Peters, Ray Comfort, and Todd Friel providing lengthy, corrective responses. In response to Kirk's rebuke of "sin sniffers" and "heresy hunters," looking for people to attack so our "ministries don't dry up," it must be said that neither Protestia nor I, as its publisher, earn any profit from this work. I operate without a salary, without ad profit tied to outrage, and without financial incentive to manufacture controversy. We also publish a clear, accessible set of doctrinal and editorial standards that invite accountability. Readers are encouraged to evaluate our reporting against those standards at any time. With sadness, I report the following ongoing hypocricies, errors, and sins, call for public repentance, and call on fellow public Christian ministers who confirm the public witness of the evidence to call Kirk to repentance as well: First, Kirk repeatedly characterizes annihilationism as a secondary issue, something Christians may disagree on without serious consequence. Yet in Episode 86, he frames the potential error of teaching ECTorment as a first-tier moral offense, calling it a “severe misrepresentation of God’s character” and “a great sin and mistake.” In effect, annihilationism’s potential error is treated as second-tier, while ECT’s potential error is framed as first-tier. His critics are condemned for strong language, even though his own framing assigns a clear double standard. Second, Kirk continues to publicly accuse unnamed brothers of unspecified sins against him. He speaks of “sin sniffers,” “heresy hunters,” and brothers behaving like unbelievers, yet never names who supposedly sinned or what sin was committed. Scripture does not authorize anonymous moral indictment. Accusation without identification prevents repentance, response, or clarification. Third, Kirk makes public claims about what Scripture teaches, on a public platform, for a mass audience, while insisting that responses to those claims must occur privately. This is incoherent. Public teaching creates public responsibility. A teacher cannot embrace the delegated authority of public instruction while exempting himself from open, public evaluation. Fourth, in the CBN interview, Kirk reframes the controversy as a surprising overreaction to an off-the-cuff question from his son. The episode itself shows otherwise. Episode 86 was planned, structured, cited, and presented as a “dangerous conversation.” He named specific theological positions, referenced Edward Fudge, and declared a personal conclusion. This was not accidental commentary, and it was not unexpected that it would draw strong reaction. Fifth, Kirk gives contradictory explanations for how he formed his beliefs. In attempting to minimize the doctrinal seriousness of ECT, he says he held to it only because of tradition, then says "verses" brought him to it, and continues to insinuate that ECT proponents today rely on tradition rather than Scripture. Sixth, Kirk repeatedly accuses online critics of illegitimate financial motives, claiming their analysis and arguments were driven by clicks, outrage, or income. At the same time, he presents his own financial concerns, canceled events, and lost opportunities as legitimate considerations. Financial motive is treated as sinful when attributed to others and understandable when attributed to himself. Seventh, Kirk appealed to many ECT teachers as fellow serious scriptural scholars, yet only listed figures who had passed away and could neither reject his conclusions nor correct his use of their authority. Living theologians who object are portrayed as divisive; dead ones are cited as allies. Eighth, Kirk openly admits that he wants annihilationism to be true, calls it a “great relief,” and imagines the joy of presenting annihilationism as "good news" to unbelievers who reject a God who eternally punishes. This is not a neutral inquiry. It is not merely "asking questions." It is doctrinal modification shaped by emotional desires - precisely the method Scripture warns against. Scripture does not require private confrontation before public correction when the teaching itself was public. Matthew 18 governs private interpersonal sin, not public doctrine. When error is public, correction must be public for the sake of those who heard it. Paul rebuked Peter publicly because the error was public. Elders are commanded to refute false teaching openly. Demanding private correction for public doctrine protects the teacher while leaving the audience confused. That is not loving. It prioritizes reputation over truth and the flock over no one. Public correction is not unchristian. It is biblical. It protects those exposed to error and provides clarity rather than silence. Jesus’ parable in Luke 16 about stewardship applies here. Teachers are not owners of doctrine; they are stewards of it. The steward is condemned not for dishonesty alone, but for handling what belonged to another according to his own preferences. Doctrine is not ours to reshape according to emotional comfort or perceived evangelistic usefulness. Faithfulness, not palatability, is the measure of stewardship. The gospel cannot be separated from what Christ saves us from. Hell is not a minor doctrine, and it is not ours to soften for relief or rhetorical safety. This video is not about malice. It is about accountability, witness, and loving a brother enough to call him out.

David Morrill

18,174 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Solicitors acting for Samantha Walker-Roberts, a leading supporter of Jess Phillips MP within the Rape Gang Survivors Panel, have written to me demanding that I stop commenting on her public interviews and political statements. Their letter, dated 31 October 2025, was sent just two days after Ms Walker-Roberts appeared again in The Guardian (29 October 2025) promoting her political position on the national grooming-gang inquiry where she demanded an apology from Nigel Farage. Ms Walker-Roberts has voluntarily taken part in multiple national media appearances, including Good Morning Britain, TalkTV, and ITV News, while giving interviews to The Guardian, The Times, and other outlets. She has publicly declared her political stance, religious affiliation, and authorship of a book, all of which firmly establish her as a public figure engaged in shaping national debate. Despite this, her solicitors now suggest that my commentary, which simply analyses her own public statements and the political use of survivor testimony, could constitute “harassment.” In my written response, I make clear that: - I have not contacted Ms Walker-Roberts privately. - My comments are based entirely on material she placed in the public domain. - My work is lawful, factual, and in the public interest. - Attempts to silence me amount to political censorship. I have spent seven years exposing institutional failings in the handling of grooming gangs and helped force the creation of the national inquiry. I will not be silenced by politically motivated legal threats. Both the solicitors’ letter and my full response are being prepared for release publicly in the interests of transparency. In the meantime, listen to this extract where Ms Walker-Roberts reveals her motivations. Is this not in the public interest? "I'm thinking of the bigger picture and the statistics that will come out of this will feed Tommy Robinson and Reform. And we don't want that." _________ They'll Rewrite History to Make Themselves the Heroes. Don't Let Them. This inquiry didn't happen because the government suddenly found its moral compass. It was dragged into existence by survivors who wouldn't shut up, whistleblowers who refused to disappear, and a public tired of being lied to. For years, they fought against it. Now they'll fight to control it. Watch how it unfolds. Limited scope. Sanitised language. Politicians rewrite history as if they are the saviours. Meanwhile, evidence will mysteriously vanish. Key witnesses will develop sudden memory loss. And when it's over, they'll package it all up as "lessons learned." The whitewash has already begun. The only question is whether we let them get away with it. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE
4:13

Solicitors acting for Samantha Walker-Roberts, a leading supporter of Jess Phillips MP within the Rape Gang Survivors Panel, have written to me demanding that I stop commenting on her public interviews and political statements. Their letter, dated 31 October 2025, was sent just two days after Ms Walker-Roberts appeared again in The Guardian (29 October 2025) promoting her political position on the national grooming-gang inquiry where she demanded an apology from Nigel Farage. Ms Walker-Roberts has voluntarily taken part in multiple national media appearances, including Good Morning Britain, TalkTV, and ITV News, while giving interviews to The Guardian, The Times, and other outlets. She has publicly declared her political stance, religious affiliation, and authorship of a book, all of which firmly establish her as a public figure engaged in shaping national debate. Despite this, her solicitors now suggest that my commentary, which simply analyses her own public statements and the political use of survivor testimony, could constitute “harassment.” In my written response, I make clear that: - I have not contacted Ms Walker-Roberts privately. - My comments are based entirely on material she placed in the public domain. - My work is lawful, factual, and in the public interest. - Attempts to silence me amount to political censorship. I have spent seven years exposing institutional failings in the handling of grooming gangs and helped force the creation of the national inquiry. I will not be silenced by politically motivated legal threats. Both the solicitors’ letter and my full response are being prepared for release publicly in the interests of transparency. In the meantime, listen to this extract where Ms Walker-Roberts reveals her motivations. Is this not in the public interest? "I'm thinking of the bigger picture and the statistics that will come out of this will feed Tommy Robinson and Reform. And we don't want that." _________ They'll Rewrite History to Make Themselves the Heroes. Don't Let Them. This inquiry didn't happen because the government suddenly found its moral compass. It was dragged into existence by survivors who wouldn't shut up, whistleblowers who refused to disappear, and a public tired of being lied to. For years, they fought against it. Now they'll fight to control it. Watch how it unfolds. Limited scope. Sanitised language. Politicians rewrite history as if they are the saviours. Meanwhile, evidence will mysteriously vanish. Key witnesses will develop sudden memory loss. And when it's over, they'll package it all up as "lessons learned." The whitewash has already begun. The only question is whether we let them get away with it. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

27,825 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A NIGHT of bingo turned into a full house of fury after a mass brawl broke out between punters. Shocking footage shows the moment a fight broke out at Club 3000 in Leeds, West Yorks with women grabbing each other by the hair and a man appearing to punch a female in the face. A witness told how tempers boiled over when a man was ejected from the venue. As he left, the crowd reportedly clapped - prompting his female companion to lash out at another woman. The dramatic footage shows women trading blows between tables, as other players desperately attempt to intervene. A man in a blue top can then appears to throw a right jab at a woman, before one onlooker screams: 'What the f***'. A group of woman can be seen grappling with one another, as other bingo-goers desperately attempt to separate them. One witness described the scene as "WWE in a bingo hall". They said: "It was absolute chaos. It was like WWE in a bingo hall. 'The whole place was in total uproar. Women were swinging handbags and pulling each others hair. "Men were running across the tables to break things up but then getting caught in the middle. 'I’ve never seen anything like it in all my years of coming here.' The session, on Sunday night, was temporarily paused while staff restored order. Bingo fans later returned to complete their games. West Yorkshire Police said it was investigating a potential public order crime. A spokesperson said: “We were called at 9.11pm to a business premises on Balm Road to reports of an ongoing fight. A public order offence is being investigated. There were no reported injuries and enquiries are ongoing.”
1:04

A NIGHT of bingo turned into a full house of fury after a mass brawl broke out between punters. Shocking footage shows the moment a fight broke out at Club 3000 in Leeds, West Yorks with women grabbing each other by the hair and a man appearing to punch a female in the face. A witness told how tempers boiled over when a man was ejected from the venue. As he left, the crowd reportedly clapped - prompting his female companion to lash out at another woman. The dramatic footage shows women trading blows between tables, as other players desperately attempt to intervene. A man in a blue top can then appears to throw a right jab at a woman, before one onlooker screams: 'What the f***'. A group of woman can be seen grappling with one another, as other bingo-goers desperately attempt to separate them. One witness described the scene as "WWE in a bingo hall". They said: "It was absolute chaos. It was like WWE in a bingo hall. 'The whole place was in total uproar. Women were swinging handbags and pulling each others hair. "Men were running across the tables to break things up but then getting caught in the middle. 'I’ve never seen anything like it in all my years of coming here.' The session, on Sunday night, was temporarily paused while staff restored order. Bingo fans later returned to complete their games. West Yorkshire Police said it was investigating a potential public order crime. A spokesperson said: “We were called at 9.11pm to a business premises on Balm Road to reports of an ongoing fight. A public order offence is being investigated. There were no reported injuries and enquiries are ongoing.”

Yapp

330,151 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Developing: Mexican security forces are currently battling elements of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel across multiple areas in the country following the elimination of its leader, Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera Cervantes, in a military operation. Details on the operation: According to Mexican news outlets, the operation that killed El Mencho was carried out by federal military forces in the mountainous region of Jalisco early Sunday morning. Reports indicate that specialized army units located and engaged the cartel leader in an operation that unfolded for hours, resulting in his death in the town of Tapalpa. Authorities have not disclosed the precise details, but sources cited by major newspapers said the mission was the result of sustained intelligence work and targeted planning by Mexico’s security apparatus. There’s also talk of some sort of US involvement (could be intel sharing). Right now, video and images coming out of Mexico show burning vehicles blocking major highways and thick plumes of smoke rising over several cities in Jalisco, including Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta. Armed groups have set up “narco” roadblocks, torching cars and trucks to paralyze traffic and slow down the movement of security forces. At the Guadalajara airport, passengers have been seen fleeing amid reports of nearby gunfire, while flights to Puerto Vallarta were temporarily suspended due to the security situation. The unrest has spread beyond Jalisco into neighboring states, including Michoacán, Guanajuato, Tamaulipas, Colima, and Nayarit, with similar blockades and vehicle fires reported along key transportation routes. Local authorities have urged residents to remain indoors as public transportation services were suspended in parts of Jalisco. The U.S. Embassy in Mexico has issued security alerts for Americans in Mexico, urging them to shelter in place due to ongoing security operations and related violence. As of right now, U.S. officials have not released a detailed public statement on the operation itself, but prior to his death, the U.S. State Department had offered a $15 million reward for information leading to the capture of El Mencho.
1:42

Developing: Mexican security forces are currently battling elements of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel across multiple areas in the country following the elimination of its leader, Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera Cervantes, in a military operation. Details on the operation: According to Mexican news outlets, the operation that killed El Mencho was carried out by federal military forces in the mountainous region of Jalisco early Sunday morning. Reports indicate that specialized army units located and engaged the cartel leader in an operation that unfolded for hours, resulting in his death in the town of Tapalpa. Authorities have not disclosed the precise details, but sources cited by major newspapers said the mission was the result of sustained intelligence work and targeted planning by Mexico’s security apparatus. There’s also talk of some sort of US involvement (could be intel sharing). Right now, video and images coming out of Mexico show burning vehicles blocking major highways and thick plumes of smoke rising over several cities in Jalisco, including Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta. Armed groups have set up “narco” roadblocks, torching cars and trucks to paralyze traffic and slow down the movement of security forces. At the Guadalajara airport, passengers have been seen fleeing amid reports of nearby gunfire, while flights to Puerto Vallarta were temporarily suspended due to the security situation. The unrest has spread beyond Jalisco into neighboring states, including Michoacán, Guanajuato, Tamaulipas, Colima, and Nayarit, with similar blockades and vehicle fires reported along key transportation routes. Local authorities have urged residents to remain indoors as public transportation services were suspended in parts of Jalisco. The U.S. Embassy in Mexico has issued security alerts for Americans in Mexico, urging them to shelter in place due to ongoing security operations and related violence. As of right now, U.S. officials have not released a detailed public statement on the operation itself, but prior to his death, the U.S. State Department had offered a $15 million reward for information leading to the capture of El Mencho.

Real News No Bullshit

38,717 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇿🇦🇺🇸 BOZELL TEARS SOUTH AFRICA'S DEATH-CHANT LIE WIDE OPEN – "KILL THE BOER" IS HATE SPEECH, FULL STOP‼️ 13 March 2026 🔴 AMBASSADOR LEO BRENT BOZELL III THE DIPLOMAT WHO FORCED SOUTH AFRICA'S SHAME INTO GLOBAL VIEW South Africa is exposed. No more hiding. No more pretending. U.S. Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III has ripped the mask off the ANC regime's grotesque double standards. On March 11 2026 at the BizNews conference in Hermanus Western Cape Bozell delivered the truth without apology. The chant "Kill the Boer Kill the Farmer" is hate speech. He declared it plainly: "I'm sorry. I don't care what your courts say. It's hate speech." Those words detonated because they named what the ANC has spent years burying. A political slogan that explicitly calls for the murder of whites is legally shielded as "historical expression" in South Africa while every other nation would prosecute it as incitement to violence. Bozell did not attack South Africa. He refused to participate in the delusion. The ANC's response was instant cowardly fury. They issued a demarche summoned the ambassador demanded he explain his "undiplomatic remarks". The same regime that tolerates Julius Malema leading crowds in death chants suddenly pretends to be offended by honesty. Their outrage is not diplomacy. It is panic at being seen for what they are. Bozell clarified on X and expressed regret over the sharp phrasing of "I don't care what your courts say" but maintained his personal view that the chant is hate speech shared by many South Africans while reaffirming that the United States respects South Africa's judicial independence. That diplomatic refinement does not dilute the initial strike. The truth landed. The pretense is shattered. 🔴 PAPENFUS DELIVERS A MERCILESS TAKEDOWN ON ENCA The fire spread the next day. In a scorching eNCA interview around March 12 2026 NEASA CEO Gerhard Papenfus obliterated the government's narrative. His argument was brutal and unanswerable. A public call to kill a racial or ethnic group is hate speech and criminal incitement everywhere else on earth. In the United States in Europe in any society with real rule of law you shout it and you are arrested charged and likely denied bail. Papenfus asked the killer question: "Ask anyone in the world is that hate speech?" He answered: "Only in South Africa does a judge rule that a call to kill a particular group is somehow not hate speech." He spoke from raw experience as the son of a farmer whose parents survived farm attacks. He quoted Malema's own repeated clarifications: the chant targets white people white farmers. The intent is not hidden. It is screamed at rallies. Papenfus dropped the bombshell. He was present when U.S. officials told South African representatives the chant must stop as a condition for improved relations. Bozell is not rogue. He is the messenger of official Washington policy. The interviewer pushed the Constitutional Court ruling and "historical context". Papenfus crushed it. Malema means killing whites. The ANC's demarche against Bozell is childish immature desperate. A regime cornered and flailing. 🔴 THE FIVE CLEAR U.S. DEMANDS PRETORIA IGNORES WITH CONTEMPT Bozell's intervention rests on five explicit U.S. demands delivered nearly a year ago and met with arrogant silence: Publicly condemn the "Kill the Boer" chant and all rhetoric that incites racial hatred or glorifies violence. Prioritise rural crime and farm murders to protect vulnerable farming communities. Reconsider the Expropriation Act enabling land seizures without compensation. Reform Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policies imposing heavy compliance burdens on foreign investors and minorities while deterring capital. Adopt genuine non-alignment in foreign policy and distance from regimes like Iran. These are practical conditions for trust investment and basic decency. Pretoria's refusal to engage is deliberate defiance. Bozell warned patience is exhausted. Consequences are mounting. 🔴 SOUTH AFRICA THE GLOBAL OUTLIER THAT SHIELDS A RACIAL DEATH CHANT South Africa's judiciary has created a legal monstrosity. The 2022 Johannesburg Equality Court reversal the 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal framing the chant as symbolic struggle poetry the Constitutional Court's March 2025 refusal to hear AfriForum's appeal. All protect a chant calling for racial murder as political speech. This is indefensible worldwide. In the United States it fails Brandenburg v. Ohio incitement tests. In Europe it triggers hate speech prosecution. UN standards prohibit advocacy of racial hatred inciting violence. Public opinion rejects the farce. Polls show 53 percent of South Africans call it hate speech rising to 85 percent among whites. Even some EFF supporters admit it is irresponsible. Malema's own words confirm targeting whites. Yet the ANC shields the poison while punishing Bozell. EFF radicals called for his expulsion declaring him persona non grata branding his comments arrogant threats and interference in South Africa's affairs. The hypocrisy is nauseating. 🔴 THE SAVAGE BRUTALITY FARMERS FACE WHILE PRETORIA PLAYS DENIAL While courts debate metaphors farmers suffer horrors. Attacks feature extreme cruelty hacked with pangas tortured mercilessly mutilated murdered far beyond theft motives. SAPS claims low numbers such as 6 murders in farming communities in Q4 2024/2025 (January to March 2025) with victims including employees farm dwellers and farmers many non-white. AfriForum disputes under-reporting highlights gratuitous torture without economic motive challenges figures like presenting evidence of eight farm owner murders in a quarter where police reported only one. Recent Western Cape incidents prove the nightmare continues. Government insists "random crime" affecting all groups. Courts protect the chant cheering killers. Rhetoric normalises hatred. Brutality escalates. Whites endure targeted terror without equivalent calls from their side. 🔴 TRUMP'S RESPONSE A REFUGEE PROGRAM SIGNALING GLOBAL CONCERN President Trump has acted decisively. Executive Order 14204 signed February 7 2025 halts aid over race-based land policies discriminatory practices and egregious actions while prioritises Afrikaner resettlement through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for those fleeing unjust racial discrimination including racially discriminatory property confiscation. FY 2026 global refugee cap is a historic low of 7500 heavily allocated to South Africans with processing targets up to 4500 applications monthly at peaks though backlogs and pauses slow flow. Early groups included around 59 in May 2025 by early 2026 numbers build into the low thousands admitted or in process. This is not exaggeration. It is Washington acknowledging danger the ANC denies. 🔴 THE ANC A PATHETIC REGIME THAT ATTACKS TRUTH-TELLERS AND ENABLES POISON The ANC follows its tired playbook. Attack messengers summon Bozell lecture on etiquette accuse disrespect of courts and history. Pathetic. None erases the central obscenity. A chant demanding farmers be killed echoes at rallies while the ruling party refuses condemnation. EFF allies push exclusionary transformation BEE as investment barriers land grabs ignoring constitutional equality courts follow the party line. The FW de Klerk Foundation calls rulings shocking endorsements of incitement. Critics warn of a hatred tinderbox with unidirectional protection for majority speech over minorities. Inaction on brutality inflammatory language leaves vulnerable communities in perpetual fear. 🔴 THE ILLUSION HAS COLLAPSED SOUTH AFRICA IS FULLY EXPOSED Bozell did not invent the crisis. He exposed it. His words amplified by Papenfus's ruthless television demolition have stripped away every pretense. South Africa can no longer pretend death chants are poetry farm terror is mere crime racial policies are pure justice. History will record this moment not as American arrogance but as the day the ANC's rotten facade crumbled. One ambassador refused the lie. The world now sees South Africa clearly. Exposed. Indefensible. Impossible to unsee. 🔴 EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER AND STATEMENT OF OPINION This article is presented as political commentary, analysis, and opinion on matters of public interest. It reflects the author’s interpretation and critique of publicly reported events, political rhetoric, government policy, media interviews, and statements made by public figures in the context of ongoing political debate. All individuals, organisations, institutions, and political parties referenced in this article are public figures or entities involved in public governance, political discourse, or matters of public policy. References to such persons or entities relate solely to their public roles and actions that are already part of the public record or widely reported in the media. Any quotations attributed to individuals are drawn from publicly available sources, media reports, interviews, speeches, or widely circulated public statements and are reproduced in good faith for purposes of commentary and analysis. The views, characterisations, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this article represent the author’s personal opinions and analytical perspective regarding matters of public concern. They are not intended to be interpreted as definitive statements of fact, legal conclusions, or allegations of criminal conduct against any individual or institution unless explicitly supported by publicly documented evidence. Strong language, rhetorical expressions, and critical commentary are used as part of political opinion and public debate regarding governance, policy, and political conduct. Such language should be understood within the context of protected democratic discourse and not as literal factual claims. Nothing in this article is intended to advocate violence, discrimination, or hostility toward any individual, group, or community. The article critiques political rhetoric, policies, and governance decisions as part of a broader discussion about freedom of expression, democratic accountability, and public policy. Statistics, legal references, and policy descriptions mentioned in this article are based on publicly reported information available at the time of writing. Readers are encouraged to consult multiple sources, official records, and judicial decisions in forming their own views on the issues discussed. By reading or sharing this article, readers acknowledge that it forms part of an ongoing public debate concerning political leadership, public policy, and freedom of expression, and that the content should be understood as opinion and commentary within that context.
19:09

🇿🇦🇺🇸 BOZELL TEARS SOUTH AFRICA'S DEATH-CHANT LIE WIDE OPEN – "KILL THE BOER" IS HATE SPEECH, FULL STOP‼️ 13 March 2026 🔴 AMBASSADOR LEO BRENT BOZELL III THE DIPLOMAT WHO FORCED SOUTH AFRICA'S SHAME INTO GLOBAL VIEW South Africa is exposed. No more hiding. No more pretending. U.S. Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III has ripped the mask off the ANC regime's grotesque double standards. On March 11 2026 at the BizNews conference in Hermanus Western Cape Bozell delivered the truth without apology. The chant "Kill the Boer Kill the Farmer" is hate speech. He declared it plainly: "I'm sorry. I don't care what your courts say. It's hate speech." Those words detonated because they named what the ANC has spent years burying. A political slogan that explicitly calls for the murder of whites is legally shielded as "historical expression" in South Africa while every other nation would prosecute it as incitement to violence. Bozell did not attack South Africa. He refused to participate in the delusion. The ANC's response was instant cowardly fury. They issued a demarche summoned the ambassador demanded he explain his "undiplomatic remarks". The same regime that tolerates Julius Malema leading crowds in death chants suddenly pretends to be offended by honesty. Their outrage is not diplomacy. It is panic at being seen for what they are. Bozell clarified on X and expressed regret over the sharp phrasing of "I don't care what your courts say" but maintained his personal view that the chant is hate speech shared by many South Africans while reaffirming that the United States respects South Africa's judicial independence. That diplomatic refinement does not dilute the initial strike. The truth landed. The pretense is shattered. 🔴 PAPENFUS DELIVERS A MERCILESS TAKEDOWN ON ENCA The fire spread the next day. In a scorching eNCA interview around March 12 2026 NEASA CEO Gerhard Papenfus obliterated the government's narrative. His argument was brutal and unanswerable. A public call to kill a racial or ethnic group is hate speech and criminal incitement everywhere else on earth. In the United States in Europe in any society with real rule of law you shout it and you are arrested charged and likely denied bail. Papenfus asked the killer question: "Ask anyone in the world is that hate speech?" He answered: "Only in South Africa does a judge rule that a call to kill a particular group is somehow not hate speech." He spoke from raw experience as the son of a farmer whose parents survived farm attacks. He quoted Malema's own repeated clarifications: the chant targets white people white farmers. The intent is not hidden. It is screamed at rallies. Papenfus dropped the bombshell. He was present when U.S. officials told South African representatives the chant must stop as a condition for improved relations. Bozell is not rogue. He is the messenger of official Washington policy. The interviewer pushed the Constitutional Court ruling and "historical context". Papenfus crushed it. Malema means killing whites. The ANC's demarche against Bozell is childish immature desperate. A regime cornered and flailing. 🔴 THE FIVE CLEAR U.S. DEMANDS PRETORIA IGNORES WITH CONTEMPT Bozell's intervention rests on five explicit U.S. demands delivered nearly a year ago and met with arrogant silence: Publicly condemn the "Kill the Boer" chant and all rhetoric that incites racial hatred or glorifies violence. Prioritise rural crime and farm murders to protect vulnerable farming communities. Reconsider the Expropriation Act enabling land seizures without compensation. Reform Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policies imposing heavy compliance burdens on foreign investors and minorities while deterring capital. Adopt genuine non-alignment in foreign policy and distance from regimes like Iran. These are practical conditions for trust investment and basic decency. Pretoria's refusal to engage is deliberate defiance. Bozell warned patience is exhausted. Consequences are mounting. 🔴 SOUTH AFRICA THE GLOBAL OUTLIER THAT SHIELDS A RACIAL DEATH CHANT South Africa's judiciary has created a legal monstrosity. The 2022 Johannesburg Equality Court reversal the 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal framing the chant as symbolic struggle poetry the Constitutional Court's March 2025 refusal to hear AfriForum's appeal. All protect a chant calling for racial murder as political speech. This is indefensible worldwide. In the United States it fails Brandenburg v. Ohio incitement tests. In Europe it triggers hate speech prosecution. UN standards prohibit advocacy of racial hatred inciting violence. Public opinion rejects the farce. Polls show 53 percent of South Africans call it hate speech rising to 85 percent among whites. Even some EFF supporters admit it is irresponsible. Malema's own words confirm targeting whites. Yet the ANC shields the poison while punishing Bozell. EFF radicals called for his expulsion declaring him persona non grata branding his comments arrogant threats and interference in South Africa's affairs. The hypocrisy is nauseating. 🔴 THE SAVAGE BRUTALITY FARMERS FACE WHILE PRETORIA PLAYS DENIAL While courts debate metaphors farmers suffer horrors. Attacks feature extreme cruelty hacked with pangas tortured mercilessly mutilated murdered far beyond theft motives. SAPS claims low numbers such as 6 murders in farming communities in Q4 2024/2025 (January to March 2025) with victims including employees farm dwellers and farmers many non-white. AfriForum disputes under-reporting highlights gratuitous torture without economic motive challenges figures like presenting evidence of eight farm owner murders in a quarter where police reported only one. Recent Western Cape incidents prove the nightmare continues. Government insists "random crime" affecting all groups. Courts protect the chant cheering killers. Rhetoric normalises hatred. Brutality escalates. Whites endure targeted terror without equivalent calls from their side. 🔴 TRUMP'S RESPONSE A REFUGEE PROGRAM SIGNALING GLOBAL CONCERN President Trump has acted decisively. Executive Order 14204 signed February 7 2025 halts aid over race-based land policies discriminatory practices and egregious actions while prioritises Afrikaner resettlement through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for those fleeing unjust racial discrimination including racially discriminatory property confiscation. FY 2026 global refugee cap is a historic low of 7500 heavily allocated to South Africans with processing targets up to 4500 applications monthly at peaks though backlogs and pauses slow flow. Early groups included around 59 in May 2025 by early 2026 numbers build into the low thousands admitted or in process. This is not exaggeration. It is Washington acknowledging danger the ANC denies. 🔴 THE ANC A PATHETIC REGIME THAT ATTACKS TRUTH-TELLERS AND ENABLES POISON The ANC follows its tired playbook. Attack messengers summon Bozell lecture on etiquette accuse disrespect of courts and history. Pathetic. None erases the central obscenity. A chant demanding farmers be killed echoes at rallies while the ruling party refuses condemnation. EFF allies push exclusionary transformation BEE as investment barriers land grabs ignoring constitutional equality courts follow the party line. The FW de Klerk Foundation calls rulings shocking endorsements of incitement. Critics warn of a hatred tinderbox with unidirectional protection for majority speech over minorities. Inaction on brutality inflammatory language leaves vulnerable communities in perpetual fear. 🔴 THE ILLUSION HAS COLLAPSED SOUTH AFRICA IS FULLY EXPOSED Bozell did not invent the crisis. He exposed it. His words amplified by Papenfus's ruthless television demolition have stripped away every pretense. South Africa can no longer pretend death chants are poetry farm terror is mere crime racial policies are pure justice. History will record this moment not as American arrogance but as the day the ANC's rotten facade crumbled. One ambassador refused the lie. The world now sees South Africa clearly. Exposed. Indefensible. Impossible to unsee. 🔴 EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER AND STATEMENT OF OPINION This article is presented as political commentary, analysis, and opinion on matters of public interest. It reflects the author’s interpretation and critique of publicly reported events, political rhetoric, government policy, media interviews, and statements made by public figures in the context of ongoing political debate. All individuals, organisations, institutions, and political parties referenced in this article are public figures or entities involved in public governance, political discourse, or matters of public policy. References to such persons or entities relate solely to their public roles and actions that are already part of the public record or widely reported in the media. Any quotations attributed to individuals are drawn from publicly available sources, media reports, interviews, speeches, or widely circulated public statements and are reproduced in good faith for purposes of commentary and analysis. The views, characterisations, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this article represent the author’s personal opinions and analytical perspective regarding matters of public concern. They are not intended to be interpreted as definitive statements of fact, legal conclusions, or allegations of criminal conduct against any individual or institution unless explicitly supported by publicly documented evidence. Strong language, rhetorical expressions, and critical commentary are used as part of political opinion and public debate regarding governance, policy, and political conduct. Such language should be understood within the context of protected democratic discourse and not as literal factual claims. Nothing in this article is intended to advocate violence, discrimination, or hostility toward any individual, group, or community. The article critiques political rhetoric, policies, and governance decisions as part of a broader discussion about freedom of expression, democratic accountability, and public policy. Statistics, legal references, and policy descriptions mentioned in this article are based on publicly reported information available at the time of writing. Readers are encouraged to consult multiple sources, official records, and judicial decisions in forming their own views on the issues discussed. By reading or sharing this article, readers acknowledge that it forms part of an ongoing public debate concerning political leadership, public policy, and freedom of expression, and that the content should be understood as opinion and commentary within that context.

I ❤️ Cape Town ~ I Stand with Russia🇷🇺 MAGA

13,907 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

U of T fails to censor Rebel News report! The University of Toronto's attempt to remove a Rebel News report examining its campus prayer room policy has failed after YouTube reinstated the video, rejecting the university's copyright complaint. The University of Toronto's attempt to remove a Rebel News report examining its campus prayer room policy has failed after YouTube reinstated the video, rejecting the university's copyright complaint. Earlier this year, we reported that U of T had redesignated the ground-floor Open Assembly Space in the Bahen Centre for Information Technology from a shared multi-faith prayer room into a dedicated Muslim prayer space. The university cited heavy daily use by Muslim students and announced upgrades, including prayer mats and ablution stations with bidets — designated washing areas where Muslims perform ritual cleansing. The change prompted concerns from Jewish students who had also relied on the centrally located room for daily prayer. They argued the newly carpeted space made praying with shoes on, a common Jewish practice, impractical, while loud congregational prayers and anti-Israel materials left in the room undermined what had previously been a neutral space. Rather than restoring shared access, the university pointed students toward other rooms elsewhere on campus. After we published our report, U of T filed a copyright complaint with YouTube over brief clips showing publicly accessible areas of its own campus used as illustrative B-roll while reporting on the university's policy. The complaint resulted in the video's temporary removal. Rebel appealed, arguing that the footage was used for legitimate news reporting, criticism, and commentary under Canada's fair dealing provisions. Despite being asked to withdraw the complaint, U of T refused. Director of Media Relations Philippe Devos maintained that the university did not believe Rebel's use qualified as fair dealing and said it would not retract its removal request. YouTube ultimately disagreed and restored the full report. Are copyright mechanisms being used to protect creative works or to discourage scrutiny of controversial public policies? Other high-profile free speech disputes at the University of Toronto, including the years-long conflict involving former professor Jordan Peterson, can be seen as evidence of a broader institutional willingness to rely on administrative or regulatory tools when faced with ideological disagreement. U of T is a publicly funded university. Students of every faith deserve equal access to shared campus spaces, and Canadians deserve journalism that can examine the decisions of powerful public institutions without being subjected to questionable takedown attempts. FULL REPORT by Scarlett Grace:
6:17

U of T fails to censor Rebel News report! The University of Toronto's attempt to remove a Rebel News report examining its campus prayer room policy has failed after YouTube reinstated the video, rejecting the university's copyright complaint. The University of Toronto's attempt to remove a Rebel News report examining its campus prayer room policy has failed after YouTube reinstated the video, rejecting the university's copyright complaint. Earlier this year, we reported that U of T had redesignated the ground-floor Open Assembly Space in the Bahen Centre for Information Technology from a shared multi-faith prayer room into a dedicated Muslim prayer space. The university cited heavy daily use by Muslim students and announced upgrades, including prayer mats and ablution stations with bidets — designated washing areas where Muslims perform ritual cleansing. The change prompted concerns from Jewish students who had also relied on the centrally located room for daily prayer. They argued the newly carpeted space made praying with shoes on, a common Jewish practice, impractical, while loud congregational prayers and anti-Israel materials left in the room undermined what had previously been a neutral space. Rather than restoring shared access, the university pointed students toward other rooms elsewhere on campus. After we published our report, U of T filed a copyright complaint with YouTube over brief clips showing publicly accessible areas of its own campus used as illustrative B-roll while reporting on the university's policy. The complaint resulted in the video's temporary removal. Rebel appealed, arguing that the footage was used for legitimate news reporting, criticism, and commentary under Canada's fair dealing provisions. Despite being asked to withdraw the complaint, U of T refused. Director of Media Relations Philippe Devos maintained that the university did not believe Rebel's use qualified as fair dealing and said it would not retract its removal request. YouTube ultimately disagreed and restored the full report. Are copyright mechanisms being used to protect creative works or to discourage scrutiny of controversial public policies? Other high-profile free speech disputes at the University of Toronto, including the years-long conflict involving former professor Jordan Peterson, can be seen as evidence of a broader institutional willingness to rely on administrative or regulatory tools when faced with ideological disagreement. U of T is a publicly funded university. Students of every faith deserve equal access to shared campus spaces, and Canadians deserve journalism that can examine the decisions of powerful public institutions without being subjected to questionable takedown attempts. FULL REPORT by Scarlett Grace:

Rebel News

22,246 просмотров • 17 дней назад

𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎: 𝐅𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐃𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐋𝐚𝐠𝐨𝐬 𝐔𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧 A female commercial driver has cried out for justice after she was assaulted and beaten by an Agbero, while trying to prevent the theft of her vehicle’s battery in Lagos State. In a viral video circulating on Tuesday, the woman could be seen in tears, her face visibly swollen, as she recounts how the Agbero boarded her vehicle under the guise of a passenger near the Oriental Hotel, claiming he was heading to the Nigerian Law School. According to the victim, She became suspicious when she caught a glimpse of him through her rear-view mirror, allegedly attempting to remove her car battery. When she confronted him, he reportedly launched a violent attack, beating her, tearing her clothes, and physically dragging her in public. “He started beating me when I asked him where he was taking my battery,” she sobbed in the video. “Look at my face, look at what he did to me. He tore my clothes and battered me. Please, anyone watching this video, help me. Call human rights. Is this how a woman trying to survive should be treated?” The female driver, whose identity has not yet been released, said she’s tired of being ignored by the very unions she pays levies to daily. She accused the National Union of Road Transport Workers and Lagos State authorities of turning a blind eye to the constant harassment and violence faced by female drivers. “This man must be brought to justice. Let him be an example. I won’t leave him until I get justice. I’m doing a daily job just to survive. Is being a female commercial driver in Lagos a crime?” she added. She also claimed the attacker is part of a ring of street thugs known for targeting commercial drivers, stealing batteries and other valuables from parked vehicles. Video Credit: X | Saharareporters --- Follow us for more breaking news and videos
4:45

𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎: 𝐅𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐃𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐋𝐚𝐠𝐨𝐬 𝐔𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧 A female commercial driver has cried out for justice after she was assaulted and beaten by an Agbero, while trying to prevent the theft of her vehicle’s battery in Lagos State. In a viral video circulating on Tuesday, the woman could be seen in tears, her face visibly swollen, as she recounts how the Agbero boarded her vehicle under the guise of a passenger near the Oriental Hotel, claiming he was heading to the Nigerian Law School. According to the victim, She became suspicious when she caught a glimpse of him through her rear-view mirror, allegedly attempting to remove her car battery. When she confronted him, he reportedly launched a violent attack, beating her, tearing her clothes, and physically dragging her in public. “He started beating me when I asked him where he was taking my battery,” she sobbed in the video. “Look at my face, look at what he did to me. He tore my clothes and battered me. Please, anyone watching this video, help me. Call human rights. Is this how a woman trying to survive should be treated?” The female driver, whose identity has not yet been released, said she’s tired of being ignored by the very unions she pays levies to daily. She accused the National Union of Road Transport Workers and Lagos State authorities of turning a blind eye to the constant harassment and violence faced by female drivers. “This man must be brought to justice. Let him be an example. I won’t leave him until I get justice. I’m doing a daily job just to survive. Is being a female commercial driver in Lagos a crime?” she added. She also claimed the attacker is part of a ring of street thugs known for targeting commercial drivers, stealing batteries and other valuables from parked vehicles. Video Credit: X | Saharareporters --- Follow us for more breaking news and videos

Punch Newspapers

227,691 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 ISLAMIZATION RAGES ON — IN RED-STATE TEXAS CAIR is pushing “Muslim Heritage Month,” and Harris County officials are embracing it - openly, proudly, and on the public dime. This should never be happening in Texas. Yet here we are. A Harris County government chamber. A fabricated “Muslim American Heritage Month.” And CAIR - an organization designated by Governor Greg Abbott as foreign terrorist-linked—being exalted, platformed, and thanked during an official, taxpayer-funded proceeding. Watch the typical CAIR propaganda video. This is Sameeha Rizvi, a Texas-based CAIR political operative, standing before county officials and delivering foreign-conflict propaganda directly into the public record—unchallenged. Understand the context Harris County chose to ignore: • Governor Greg Abbott designated CAIR as a foreign terrorist-linked organization tied to Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas networks. • The Texas Legislature refused to legitimize “Muslim Heritage Month” • A state-level push failed So the agenda pivoted locally. After a Pakistan-born Democrat state lawmaker failed to move “Muslim Heritage Month” through the Legislature via HCR 18 - where it stalled with no hearings and no votes - activists didn’t stop. Harris County didn’t hesitate. It fabricated a January “Muslim American Heritage Month” and used it to elevate CAIR and hand its operative a government microphone. What you are watching is not public comment. It is agenda delivery. In this clip, Rizvi: • Declares an “ongoing genocide” — a foreign Hamas propaganda claim • Accuses Texas of dehumanization and violence • Invokes bullying of children (I already exposed a Fake Hate Crime at a Houston school that CAIR was pushing) • Wraps it all in “heritage” language to shut down scrutiny This is the Red–Green axis in action. Rizvi’s background matters. Before CAIR, she was embedded in far-left grievance activism, DEI politics, abortion activism, identity-based pressure campaigns, and institutional coercion. When she joined CAIR, that toolkit didn’t disappear. It was repurposed. Marxist grievance politics supply the tactics. Islamic advocacy supplies the objective. Local government becomes the delivery system. And notice the most revealing moment: She thanks the county commissioner by name, because this was not spontaneous. It was welcomed and advanced from inside the local government. County government exists to manage roads, courts, budgets, emergency services, and public safety. It does not exist to arbitrate foreign wars. It does not exist to validate ideological movements. And it certainly does not exist to platform organizations the State of Texas has flagged as security threats. Yet Harris County did exactly that. And where were the conservatives? No objections. No pushback. No outrage. This is the problem. Islamization in Texas no longer advances through statewide legislation. It advances through county chambers, fake heritage months, left-wing operatives, and cowardice. Shame on Harris County. And shame on every Texas leader who stayed silent while the local government was used to launder radical READ THE FULL REPORT:
1:14

🚨 ISLAMIZATION RAGES ON — IN RED-STATE TEXAS CAIR is pushing “Muslim Heritage Month,” and Harris County officials are embracing it - openly, proudly, and on the public dime. This should never be happening in Texas. Yet here we are. A Harris County government chamber. A fabricated “Muslim American Heritage Month.” And CAIR - an organization designated by Governor Greg Abbott as foreign terrorist-linked—being exalted, platformed, and thanked during an official, taxpayer-funded proceeding. Watch the typical CAIR propaganda video. This is Sameeha Rizvi, a Texas-based CAIR political operative, standing before county officials and delivering foreign-conflict propaganda directly into the public record—unchallenged. Understand the context Harris County chose to ignore: • Governor Greg Abbott designated CAIR as a foreign terrorist-linked organization tied to Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas networks. • The Texas Legislature refused to legitimize “Muslim Heritage Month” • A state-level push failed So the agenda pivoted locally. After a Pakistan-born Democrat state lawmaker failed to move “Muslim Heritage Month” through the Legislature via HCR 18 - where it stalled with no hearings and no votes - activists didn’t stop. Harris County didn’t hesitate. It fabricated a January “Muslim American Heritage Month” and used it to elevate CAIR and hand its operative a government microphone. What you are watching is not public comment. It is agenda delivery. In this clip, Rizvi: • Declares an “ongoing genocide” — a foreign Hamas propaganda claim • Accuses Texas of dehumanization and violence • Invokes bullying of children (I already exposed a Fake Hate Crime at a Houston school that CAIR was pushing) • Wraps it all in “heritage” language to shut down scrutiny This is the Red–Green axis in action. Rizvi’s background matters. Before CAIR, she was embedded in far-left grievance activism, DEI politics, abortion activism, identity-based pressure campaigns, and institutional coercion. When she joined CAIR, that toolkit didn’t disappear. It was repurposed. Marxist grievance politics supply the tactics. Islamic advocacy supplies the objective. Local government becomes the delivery system. And notice the most revealing moment: She thanks the county commissioner by name, because this was not spontaneous. It was welcomed and advanced from inside the local government. County government exists to manage roads, courts, budgets, emergency services, and public safety. It does not exist to arbitrate foreign wars. It does not exist to validate ideological movements. And it certainly does not exist to platform organizations the State of Texas has flagged as security threats. Yet Harris County did exactly that. And where were the conservatives? No objections. No pushback. No outrage. This is the problem. Islamization in Texas no longer advances through statewide legislation. It advances through county chambers, fake heritage months, left-wing operatives, and cowardice. Shame on Harris County. And shame on every Texas leader who stayed silent while the local government was used to launder radical READ THE FULL REPORT:

Amy Mek

218,182 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Man Arrested for Brutal Assault on Schoolgirl Over Mango Theft in Maiduguri By: Zagazola Makama A man identified as Mamman Shettima Baba has been arrested for brutally beating a young schoolgirl for plucking mangoes from a compound in the Pompomari Housing Estate of Maiduguri. The incident, captured on video and circulated widely on social media, showed Shettima Baba repeatedly flogging the girl with a thick stick while his wife recorded the assault, encouraging him to “beat her more.” According to eyewitnesses, the girl and her friends were on their way home from school when they noticed an open gate with a mango tree inside. Acting on youthful curiosity, they entered the compound and picked some mangoes. However, some Almajiri children caught one of the girls and handed her over to the woman residing in the house. She, in turn, ordered her husband to violently punish the child. The Nigerian Security and Civil Defense Corps (NSCDC) responded swiftly to the viral video and arrested the suspect. The Commandant of the Corps, Abdulrazaq Haroon, confirmed the arrest and added that during preliminary investigations, Shettima Baba confessed to the assault, justifying his actions by claiming that students had been persistently plucking mangoes from his tree. The brutality of the attack, however, has sparked public outrage, with legal practitioners, child rights activists, and government officials demanding strict legal action against the suspect. In response to the attack, Hamza Nuhu Dantani, a legal practitioner, has petitioned the Borno State Commissioner of Police, calling for the immediate arrest and prosecution of the suspect. The petition outlines charges of culpable homicide, assault, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt, citing violations of the Borno State Penal Code Law, 2023. It also accuses the suspect of attempted homicide and calls for: The immediate arrest and prosecution of Shettima Baba. A full investigation to identify and prosecute any accomplices. Medical and psychological support for the traumatized young victim. A public warning against violence and abuse of minors. Meanwhile, The Borno State Commissioner of Education, Lawan Abbah Wakilbe, and the Commissioner of Justice have both assured the public that justice will be served. Wakilbe gave the assurance when he visited the NSCSC command and commend the officers for the swift intervention. My take; Despite public outcry and legal provisions protecting minors, cases of human rights abuses in Borno State often fail to reach their logical conclusion. Many perpetrators walk free due to political influence, connections with high-ranking officials, or social stigma that discourages victims from seeking justice. In several past cases, suspects were released without trial, while victims or their families were pressured into withdrawing complaints. The culture of impunity surrounding child abuse, domestic violence, and police brutality in the state has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the legal system in holding offenders accountable. Observers are closely watching how this latest case will be handled, as many believe it could set a precedent for future human rights cases in the state. Prof. Babagana Umara Zulum mustapha wakilbe Nigeria Police Force NHRC Nigeria
0:10

Man Arrested for Brutal Assault on Schoolgirl Over Mango Theft in Maiduguri By: Zagazola Makama A man identified as Mamman Shettima Baba has been arrested for brutally beating a young schoolgirl for plucking mangoes from a compound in the Pompomari Housing Estate of Maiduguri. The incident, captured on video and circulated widely on social media, showed Shettima Baba repeatedly flogging the girl with a thick stick while his wife recorded the assault, encouraging him to “beat her more.” According to eyewitnesses, the girl and her friends were on their way home from school when they noticed an open gate with a mango tree inside. Acting on youthful curiosity, they entered the compound and picked some mangoes. However, some Almajiri children caught one of the girls and handed her over to the woman residing in the house. She, in turn, ordered her husband to violently punish the child. The Nigerian Security and Civil Defense Corps (NSCDC) responded swiftly to the viral video and arrested the suspect. The Commandant of the Corps, Abdulrazaq Haroon, confirmed the arrest and added that during preliminary investigations, Shettima Baba confessed to the assault, justifying his actions by claiming that students had been persistently plucking mangoes from his tree. The brutality of the attack, however, has sparked public outrage, with legal practitioners, child rights activists, and government officials demanding strict legal action against the suspect. In response to the attack, Hamza Nuhu Dantani, a legal practitioner, has petitioned the Borno State Commissioner of Police, calling for the immediate arrest and prosecution of the suspect. The petition outlines charges of culpable homicide, assault, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt, citing violations of the Borno State Penal Code Law, 2023. It also accuses the suspect of attempted homicide and calls for: The immediate arrest and prosecution of Shettima Baba. A full investigation to identify and prosecute any accomplices. Medical and psychological support for the traumatized young victim. A public warning against violence and abuse of minors. Meanwhile, The Borno State Commissioner of Education, Lawan Abbah Wakilbe, and the Commissioner of Justice have both assured the public that justice will be served. Wakilbe gave the assurance when he visited the NSCSC command and commend the officers for the swift intervention. My take; Despite public outcry and legal provisions protecting minors, cases of human rights abuses in Borno State often fail to reach their logical conclusion. Many perpetrators walk free due to political influence, connections with high-ranking officials, or social stigma that discourages victims from seeking justice. In several past cases, suspects were released without trial, while victims or their families were pressured into withdrawing complaints. The culture of impunity surrounding child abuse, domestic violence, and police brutality in the state has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the legal system in holding offenders accountable. Observers are closely watching how this latest case will be handled, as many believe it could set a precedent for future human rights cases in the state. Prof. Babagana Umara Zulum mustapha wakilbe Nigeria Police Force NHRC Nigeria

Zagazola

48,385 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | AITC National General Secretary and TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee says, "A secret meeting was held between the BJP candidate and ES Purushottam Das in Room No. 208 at Sagarika Hotel in Diamond Harbour. They thought they could meet quietly and no one would find out, that they could separately bat on behalf of the Election Commission and the BJP without being caught. But I am present everywhere, in the air, the soil, in every leaf and vine. Where will they escape? Where will they run? From tea stalls to markets, from food shops to hotels, from sari shops to fruit stalls, from fish markets to the jetty, I am connected everywhere. I have exposed them. The police have taken action against them, and you have already seen the video of their secret meeting in the public domain. The police have begun an investigation. The Election Commission has changed the Additional SP of Diamond Harbour, the SDPO, the OC of Usthi Police Station, the OC of Diamond Harbour, and the IC of Falta. Thieves commit theft, the police catch them, and yet action is taken against the police... They think that by changing five officers, they can corner Abhishek Banerjee. I challenge Gyanesh Kumar and Amit Shah, we will meet on the 4th. I will increase the margin in Diamond Harbour, increase the margin in Magrahat Purba, and this time I will take the margin in Magrahat Paschim to one lakh. I give you my word." (Video Source: AITC)
2:03

#WATCH | AITC National General Secretary and TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee says, "A secret meeting was held between the BJP candidate and ES Purushottam Das in Room No. 208 at Sagarika Hotel in Diamond Harbour. They thought they could meet quietly and no one would find out, that they could separately bat on behalf of the Election Commission and the BJP without being caught. But I am present everywhere, in the air, the soil, in every leaf and vine. Where will they escape? Where will they run? From tea stalls to markets, from food shops to hotels, from sari shops to fruit stalls, from fish markets to the jetty, I am connected everywhere. I have exposed them. The police have taken action against them, and you have already seen the video of their secret meeting in the public domain. The police have begun an investigation. The Election Commission has changed the Additional SP of Diamond Harbour, the SDPO, the OC of Usthi Police Station, the OC of Diamond Harbour, and the IC of Falta. Thieves commit theft, the police catch them, and yet action is taken against the police... They think that by changing five officers, they can corner Abhishek Banerjee. I challenge Gyanesh Kumar and Amit Shah, we will meet on the 4th. I will increase the margin in Diamond Harbour, increase the margin in Magrahat Purba, and this time I will take the margin in Magrahat Paschim to one lakh. I give you my word." (Video Source: AITC)

ANI

90,816 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

⚔️🪖 ⚔️ CAPITULATION ⚔️🪖⚔️ ⚔️🪖 ⚔️ To The Q Plan ⚔️🪖⚔️ The following video by Charlie Freak (Charlie Freak) is known as "Trump & The Q Plan: Complete From A To Z" which was designed to help you understand how CIC Donald Trump (Donald J. Trump) was able to use monumental volumes of #adrenochrome, #organharvesting and #childtrafficking evidence to get all world leaders to capitulate to the White Hat Military Alliance plan. This includes fake royalty, the Jesuit Vatican, all Khazarian Mafia controlled central banks, presidents and prime ministers. Essentially, making Trump the richest, most powerful man in the world, backed by the largest military alliance coalition (BRICS+ BRICS News) as all countries that agreed to capitulate to Trump and the White Hat Military Alliance's demands have since been taking orders. The capitulators that submitted to the White Hat Military Alliance plan were forced to assist in the worldwide operation or risk being exposed on the mainstream level for their pedophiliac criminality. As mentioned, human cloning has long been confirmed and many of the replaced elites you have seen are in fact actors/doubles standing in for their originals. They are doing so to assist normies wake up by exposing their originals criminality, ruining their legacies, while doubling as spies gathering intel on other pedophiles that have not yet been arrested/apprehended by the military. The necessity for doubles acting as placeholders until the military tribunals can be made public is because humanity is still awakening to the crimes these sick disgusting Cabal Deep State Freemason Globalist Illuminati Jesuit Khazarian Luciferian Zionists are truly involved in. Civil war would break out, the majority of society would literally go mentally insane and many would unfortunately commit suicide if they learned the full truth of their crimes against humanity all at once. This is why we must help everyone we know raise their vibrational frequency, overcome cognitive dissonance, take the RedPill, defeat indoctrination and demand public disclosure of military tribunals for crimes against humanity. Once we collectively see the light we shall collectively know the truth, we are in it together. #WWG1WGA #GodWins #NCSWIC ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Article↘️↘️ 🔍"Mid-2020 GITMO Update: Arrests, Indictments, & Executions" 💊 💊
1:38:14

⚔️🪖 ⚔️ CAPITULATION ⚔️🪖⚔️ ⚔️🪖 ⚔️ To The Q Plan ⚔️🪖⚔️ The following video by Charlie Freak (Charlie Freak) is known as "Trump & The Q Plan: Complete From A To Z" which was designed to help you understand how CIC Donald Trump (Donald J. Trump) was able to use monumental volumes of #adrenochrome, #organharvesting and #childtrafficking evidence to get all world leaders to capitulate to the White Hat Military Alliance plan. This includes fake royalty, the Jesuit Vatican, all Khazarian Mafia controlled central banks, presidents and prime ministers. Essentially, making Trump the richest, most powerful man in the world, backed by the largest military alliance coalition (BRICS+ BRICS News) as all countries that agreed to capitulate to Trump and the White Hat Military Alliance's demands have since been taking orders. The capitulators that submitted to the White Hat Military Alliance plan were forced to assist in the worldwide operation or risk being exposed on the mainstream level for their pedophiliac criminality. As mentioned, human cloning has long been confirmed and many of the replaced elites you have seen are in fact actors/doubles standing in for their originals. They are doing so to assist normies wake up by exposing their originals criminality, ruining their legacies, while doubling as spies gathering intel on other pedophiles that have not yet been arrested/apprehended by the military. The necessity for doubles acting as placeholders until the military tribunals can be made public is because humanity is still awakening to the crimes these sick disgusting Cabal Deep State Freemason Globalist Illuminati Jesuit Khazarian Luciferian Zionists are truly involved in. Civil war would break out, the majority of society would literally go mentally insane and many would unfortunately commit suicide if they learned the full truth of their crimes against humanity all at once. This is why we must help everyone we know raise their vibrational frequency, overcome cognitive dissonance, take the RedPill, defeat indoctrination and demand public disclosure of military tribunals for crimes against humanity. Once we collectively see the light we shall collectively know the truth, we are in it together. #WWG1WGA #GodWins #NCSWIC ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Article↘️↘️ 🔍"Mid-2020 GITMO Update: Arrests, Indictments, & Executions" 💊 💊

Not Op Cue

1,240,746 просмотров • 2 лет назад

1/8 🚨 Empowering Fraudulent Actors Can Destroy Lives, Institutions, and Public Trust Fraudulent and predatory actors rarely rise alone. They are often elevated by influential institutions, respected professionals, and powerful voices who lend credibility before exercising proper due diligence. In this video, during the United Nations roundtable 'Healthy Oceans and Seas: a way forward' on 4 February 2014 (co-hosted by the Sustainable Oceans Alliance, the governments of Italy and Palau, and the Global Partnerships Forum), Amir Dossal — Chairman of the Global Partnerships Forum, Co-Chair of the Sustainable Oceans Alliance, and a former 25-year UN veteran who served as Executive Director of the UN Office for Partnerships — publicly introduces Ghislaine Maxwell — Jeffrey Epstein’s closest accomplice — as: “the person who has been the inspiration behind the Sustainable Oceans Alliance…” and then as: “my dear friend, Ghislaine Maxwell.” ⚠️ That is how dangerous people can become normalized: when the failure to perform due diligence does not merely create error, but enables harm on a far larger scale. ⚠️ And this pattern is not confined to exploiting the Ocean Alliance to help shield s-e-x trafficking. The same reckless enabling can emerge anywhere influence is used to protect the wrong people from scrutiny — even in the very field that claims to defend scientific integrity. 🚨 On 17 Nov 2025, we exposed the PubPeer "PubSmear" Network Mob and its public face, Elisabeth M. Bik, the fake “science integrity consultant”, who has spent years stalking, smearing, and helping destroy the careers of researchers she targets — by weaponizing a deeply compromised, so-called post-publication peer review platform, PubPeer (aka PubSmear) that is continuously amplified by the institutional arm of the mob network, Retraction Watch. Both of these corrupt organizations (the PubPeer Foundation & Retraction Watch) are riddled with enormous conflicts of interest in management and leadership — with Ivan Oransky positioned at the center of those conflicts as a board member (director) of the PubPeer Foundation and co-founder (and former executive) of Retraction Watch. We publicly released the FULL EVIDENCE PACKAGE detailing how Bik and the PubPeer "PubSmear" Network Mob have weaponized "research integrity" to 100% censor critiques of their own flawed work while relentlessly targeting others (🔗 link to the full evidence package in Part 5 of this thread). 📌 But figures this deeply compromised do not rise alone. They are often elevated by those who recklessly endorse them, enable them, and empower them without asking the questions that should have been asked from the beginning. 📢🧵 Read the thread to see who helped make it possible.
1:33

1/8 🚨 Empowering Fraudulent Actors Can Destroy Lives, Institutions, and Public Trust Fraudulent and predatory actors rarely rise alone. They are often elevated by influential institutions, respected professionals, and powerful voices who lend credibility before exercising proper due diligence. In this video, during the United Nations roundtable 'Healthy Oceans and Seas: a way forward' on 4 February 2014 (co-hosted by the Sustainable Oceans Alliance, the governments of Italy and Palau, and the Global Partnerships Forum), Amir Dossal — Chairman of the Global Partnerships Forum, Co-Chair of the Sustainable Oceans Alliance, and a former 25-year UN veteran who served as Executive Director of the UN Office for Partnerships — publicly introduces Ghislaine Maxwell — Jeffrey Epstein’s closest accomplice — as: “the person who has been the inspiration behind the Sustainable Oceans Alliance…” and then as: “my dear friend, Ghislaine Maxwell.” ⚠️ That is how dangerous people can become normalized: when the failure to perform due diligence does not merely create error, but enables harm on a far larger scale. ⚠️ And this pattern is not confined to exploiting the Ocean Alliance to help shield s-e-x trafficking. The same reckless enabling can emerge anywhere influence is used to protect the wrong people from scrutiny — even in the very field that claims to defend scientific integrity. 🚨 On 17 Nov 2025, we exposed the PubPeer "PubSmear" Network Mob and its public face, Elisabeth M. Bik, the fake “science integrity consultant”, who has spent years stalking, smearing, and helping destroy the careers of researchers she targets — by weaponizing a deeply compromised, so-called post-publication peer review platform, PubPeer (aka PubSmear) that is continuously amplified by the institutional arm of the mob network, Retraction Watch. Both of these corrupt organizations (the PubPeer Foundation & Retraction Watch) are riddled with enormous conflicts of interest in management and leadership — with Ivan Oransky positioned at the center of those conflicts as a board member (director) of the PubPeer Foundation and co-founder (and former executive) of Retraction Watch. We publicly released the FULL EVIDENCE PACKAGE detailing how Bik and the PubPeer "PubSmear" Network Mob have weaponized "research integrity" to 100% censor critiques of their own flawed work while relentlessly targeting others (🔗 link to the full evidence package in Part 5 of this thread). 📌 But figures this deeply compromised do not rise alone. They are often elevated by those who recklessly endorse them, enable them, and empower them without asking the questions that should have been asked from the beginning. 📢🧵 Read the thread to see who helped make it possible.

ScienceGuardians

15,219 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

💥SCANDAL: Two-faced mayor caught on hot mic privately agreeing with Second Sons' alleged racist views — then publicly shames the group for exposing it. On January 24, 2026, members of Second Sons Canada joined the broader "Safe Highway Rally" movement in Cochrane, Ontario, turning heads and sparking necessary conversation. The group, a Canadian men's nationalist club dedicated to protecting traditional values and prioritizing citizen safety, displayed a bold banner near the town's welcome sign reading "INDIAN TRUCKS KILL CANUCKS." Far from mindless provocation, this message zeroes in on a documented crisis: the alarming rise in trucking-related fatalities on Canadian roads, particularly linked to rapid changes in the industry driven by mass immigration policies. Transport Canada data and insurance reports show commercial vehicle collisions increasing sharply in recent years, with immigrants—many from India—entering the trucking sector through streamlined licensing programs. Second Sons Canada isn't inventing problems; they're highlighting them in plain language when mainstream politicians refuse to. Their appearance in Cochrane aligned with coordinated rallies along Highway 11, where locals have long demanded better road safety, guardrails, maintenance, and accountability. By tying immigration-driven industry shifts to real Canadian deaths, the group forced the conversation beyond platitudes. Cochrane Mayor Peter Politis was on hand at the Pavilion during the rally events, speaking to crowds about the urgency of Highway 11 safety. Yet shortly after, public reports emerged of him expressing shame over the town's association with the banner. In what appeared to be a Facebook post or statement, the mayor reportedly lamented being "ashamed of our town," called the sign "racism at its best," and emphasized that the demonstrators "were not from here" and "not Cochranites," distancing the community from the action while implying it unfairly tarnished Cochrane's image. This public posture stands in stark contradiction to what Mayor Politis said privately after being caught on a hot mic during an interaction at the Pavilion between the mayor and Second Sons member Derek Harrison. In the recording—captured inadvertently during the event—Politis engages more candidly, acknowledging the underlying safety concerns raised by the group without the performative outrage seen in his later comments. The exchange reveals a mayor who, in private, appears to grasp the legitimacy of highlighting trucking dangers tied to policy failures, even as he publicly condemns the messengers to maintain political optics. This isn't just about one banner; it's about leadership hypocrisy. Mayor Politis participated in the Highway 11 rally ecosystem, using similar platforms to rail against dangerous roads and call for action. Yet when Second Sons Canada connects the dots to immigration-driven trucking issues—backed by real statistics—he pivots to shame and denial. Small-town mayors often face pressure to appease critics and avoid controversy, but Canadians deserve consistency. If road safety is truly the priority, why denounce those forcing the tough discussion? Second Sons Canada has made similar statements in other Ontario communities like Orillia and London, always framing their activism around remigration solutions, national sovereignty, and protecting "our people, our home, our future." Their blunt style cuts through media filters and political correctness, resonating with many frustrated by unchecked policies that strain infrastructure and endanger lives. The recording shows that even local leaders may privately recognize the validity of these concerns—yet choose public virtue-signalling over honest dialogue. Cochrane residents, and Canadians broadly, shouldn't be shamed for raising alarms about preventable deaths. Instead, leaders like Mayor Politis should engage substantively: address trucking standards, immigration impacts on industries, and Highway 11 fixes without scapegoating those who speak uncomfortable truths.
1:15

💥SCANDAL: Two-faced mayor caught on hot mic privately agreeing with Second Sons' alleged racist views — then publicly shames the group for exposing it. On January 24, 2026, members of Second Sons Canada joined the broader "Safe Highway Rally" movement in Cochrane, Ontario, turning heads and sparking necessary conversation. The group, a Canadian men's nationalist club dedicated to protecting traditional values and prioritizing citizen safety, displayed a bold banner near the town's welcome sign reading "INDIAN TRUCKS KILL CANUCKS." Far from mindless provocation, this message zeroes in on a documented crisis: the alarming rise in trucking-related fatalities on Canadian roads, particularly linked to rapid changes in the industry driven by mass immigration policies. Transport Canada data and insurance reports show commercial vehicle collisions increasing sharply in recent years, with immigrants—many from India—entering the trucking sector through streamlined licensing programs. Second Sons Canada isn't inventing problems; they're highlighting them in plain language when mainstream politicians refuse to. Their appearance in Cochrane aligned with coordinated rallies along Highway 11, where locals have long demanded better road safety, guardrails, maintenance, and accountability. By tying immigration-driven industry shifts to real Canadian deaths, the group forced the conversation beyond platitudes. Cochrane Mayor Peter Politis was on hand at the Pavilion during the rally events, speaking to crowds about the urgency of Highway 11 safety. Yet shortly after, public reports emerged of him expressing shame over the town's association with the banner. In what appeared to be a Facebook post or statement, the mayor reportedly lamented being "ashamed of our town," called the sign "racism at its best," and emphasized that the demonstrators "were not from here" and "not Cochranites," distancing the community from the action while implying it unfairly tarnished Cochrane's image. This public posture stands in stark contradiction to what Mayor Politis said privately after being caught on a hot mic during an interaction at the Pavilion between the mayor and Second Sons member Derek Harrison. In the recording—captured inadvertently during the event—Politis engages more candidly, acknowledging the underlying safety concerns raised by the group without the performative outrage seen in his later comments. The exchange reveals a mayor who, in private, appears to grasp the legitimacy of highlighting trucking dangers tied to policy failures, even as he publicly condemns the messengers to maintain political optics. This isn't just about one banner; it's about leadership hypocrisy. Mayor Politis participated in the Highway 11 rally ecosystem, using similar platforms to rail against dangerous roads and call for action. Yet when Second Sons Canada connects the dots to immigration-driven trucking issues—backed by real statistics—he pivots to shame and denial. Small-town mayors often face pressure to appease critics and avoid controversy, but Canadians deserve consistency. If road safety is truly the priority, why denounce those forcing the tough discussion? Second Sons Canada has made similar statements in other Ontario communities like Orillia and London, always framing their activism around remigration solutions, national sovereignty, and protecting "our people, our home, our future." Their blunt style cuts through media filters and political correctness, resonating with many frustrated by unchecked policies that strain infrastructure and endanger lives. The recording shows that even local leaders may privately recognize the validity of these concerns—yet choose public virtue-signalling over honest dialogue. Cochrane residents, and Canadians broadly, shouldn't be shamed for raising alarms about preventable deaths. Instead, leaders like Mayor Politis should engage substantively: address trucking standards, immigration impacts on industries, and Highway 11 fixes without scapegoating those who speak uncomfortable truths.

Wiretap Media

58,863 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад