正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Ex-Prem referee Mark Halsey believes VAR should have intervened for Jude Bellingham's equaliser against Norway 👀
27 条评论

The referees won the game for England,shame on them just disgusting

Nah, if it does touch it, it's an absolute whisker ball doesn't change trajectory. Game over, England win.

It didn’t hit it though, they have a sensor in the ball, they confirmed it didn’t hit… Stop spinning lies, wait, you work for the sun, that’s literally your job. Nevermind.

1. I haven't seen any footage showing it hit anything. 2. If VAR did intervene, then the snicko showed that the ball hit nothing. There was nothing.

With our own eyes the ball touched the cable. What is wrong with this whole system???

It was looked at and there was no indication from the in-ball technology that it hit anything. It's mad how many people this morning are literally crying out for even more ways to disallow goals than we already have

Mark- 1/ Is it clear and obvious it hits the sky cam? I really don’t think it is 2/ is outside interference VAR reviewable?

@RefereeHalsey Surely Must be good news for Peter Shilton if they’ll go that far back to check goals..

@RefereeHalsey Off with your head traitor!

This fool retired after 2012–13. He hasn’t been involved with VAR stop scrapping the bottom of the barrel and getting irrelevant people. The ball doesn’t touch the cable fifa have made that clear

There's no evidence it touched the cable

That's why he's an ex ref!

Sun against an England team surprise surprise .. do you have a Scottish editor too 🤣🤣 💩reporting as always and why football fans in England hate the sun and haven’t bought it for years

Sadly football at the top level is becoming an unwatchable sport. Even if it did hit the cam Norway had plenty of opportunities to prevent the Bellingham goal. We can’t let VAR and scared refs to destroy this beautiful game.

He was 90% wrong as a ref so why break the habit of a lifetime

This nobody can keep his daft opinions.

“Appears to” but doesn’t. Clown.

FIFA said it didnt.This bloke was a referee? TF he isnt one now.

It 100% wasn’t checked, they had no idea that it had happened

Appears, and If, the ball technology says it didn’t

Mr Halsey - In your own words the ball “appears” to hit the camera cable, yet the evidence that FIFA have clearly indicates there was no contact with the cable, so no there was no case/argument for VAR to intervene or for the referee to have cancelled the goal.

The ball 100% hit the cable & saying otherwise is outright false.

Why wasn't a Norwegian player there, it's fortunate, if the ball was picked by a Norwegian, would we be havi6this conversation?

Does it? Show me evidence, conclusive evidence!!

Not interesting at all, VAR missed it, they don’t get everything right.

Nope

“Appears to”


