Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

【Exveemon at the Hidden Spring】 What starts private by the spring turns into something Exveemon can’t escape. He won’t leave the same way. [5 mins] SFX: OPENNSFW SFX VA: FuriousRedDemon & JeremyColeNSFW #ExVeemon #Digimon #NSFW #Yiff #tentacles #cumshot #aiart

Neilzou1's profile picture

Theozzz

10,353 subscribers

88,720 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#ExVeemon#Digimon#NSFW#Yiff#tentacles#cumshot#aiart
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

At the eleventh hour the KRAM animation is complete... This year, we asked what would happen if this time Krystal was domming the generic lizard dude instead of the other way around... Krystal by MrWarfaremachine Lizard by Petruz SFX from OpenNSFW + freesound #nsfw #rule34 #KRAM
1:11

Sensitive content

At the eleventh hour the KRAM animation is complete... This year, we asked what would happen if this time Krystal was domming the generic lizard dude instead of the other way around... Krystal by MrWarfaremachine Lizard by Petruz SFX from OpenNSFW + freesound #nsfw #rule34 #KRAM

ASSCASTER🔞 COMMS CLOSED (5/5)

29,354 views • 2 years ago

Imagine being on an airplane with this guy who just can’t shut his damn mouth even after warned by the Flight attendants & passengers! He won’t stop complaining about everything & then when saying he will shut up & sleep he starts yapping about something else! What would you do?
2:47

Imagine being on an airplane with this guy who just can’t shut his damn mouth even after warned by the Flight attendants & passengers! He won’t stop complaining about everything & then when saying he will shut up & sleep he starts yapping about something else! What would you do?

Suzie rizzio

1,948,012 views • 9 months ago

Mark Carney just got completely owned on stage by a Native Chief — and he had the exact same reaction he always has when things get real. He stared at the floor. Went silent. Couldn’t even respond like a leader. This is the same guy who’s barely in the House of Commons. The same guy who bolts the second the opposition starts pressing him. The same guy who dodges reporters like they’re carrying a disease. And the same guy who refuses to talk about the recession he helped create and is now trying to gaslight Canadians into believing is “technical.” He can jet around the world playing global statesman, but the second someone actually holds him accountable in his own country, he shrinks. This isn’t leadership. This is a guy who knows he can’t defend what he’s done to Canada. Drop a 🔥 if you’re sick of the disappearing act.
0:39

Mark Carney just got completely owned on stage by a Native Chief — and he had the exact same reaction he always has when things get real. He stared at the floor. Went silent. Couldn’t even respond like a leader. This is the same guy who’s barely in the House of Commons. The same guy who bolts the second the opposition starts pressing him. The same guy who dodges reporters like they’re carrying a disease. And the same guy who refuses to talk about the recession he helped create and is now trying to gaslight Canadians into believing is “technical.” He can jet around the world playing global statesman, but the second someone actually holds him accountable in his own country, he shrinks. This isn’t leadership. This is a guy who knows he can’t defend what he’s done to Canada. Drop a 🔥 if you’re sick of the disappearing act.

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

82,256 views • 3 months ago

He Made Me Huge: Episode 3 | Muscle Growth Transformation Animation (Short Version) What happens when growth doesn’t stop? In He Made Me Huge Episode 3, Justin’s transformation reaches a whole new level. After consuming a mysterious serum created by Logan, his body begins to change in ways he can’t control. What starts as muscle growth quickly turns into something far more intense. From subtle changes… to massive physical expansion… this episode explores the moment everything shifts. As Justin grows bigger and stronger, the hunger increases… and Logan seems to know more than he’s saying. ⚡ This is just the beginning.
1:37

He Made Me Huge: Episode 3 | Muscle Growth Transformation Animation (Short Version) What happens when growth doesn’t stop? In He Made Me Huge Episode 3, Justin’s transformation reaches a whole new level. After consuming a mysterious serum created by Logan, his body begins to change in ways he can’t control. What starts as muscle growth quickly turns into something far more intense. From subtle changes… to massive physical expansion… this episode explores the moment everything shifts. As Justin grows bigger and stronger, the hunger increases… and Logan seems to know more than he’s saying. ⚡ This is just the beginning.

The GrowthDom

13,319 views • 3 months ago

THE HEAD ENGINEER AT ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE ONE FILE TURNS INTO A FINISHED PRODUCT IN 24 HOURS you hire nobody - you paste a $3.2M file into Fable 5, and the system unrolls itself from there. root → wiring → 4 branches → tests → release → back into the root in the first hour you write 4 things: boundaries, stack, roles, escalation - everything downstream is a consequence of that file. the first 5 hours the system wires itself into tools and only then decides what to build - a team would spread that across two weeks. 8 straight hours run 4 parallel branches with zero meetings - the same block a team fills with standups. by the time you finally open the diff, tests and the critic have already rejected it twice. the changelog is written by the run, not by a human from memory - so it never falls behind the code. your total involvement across the day is exactly 2 hours: the first one, and the one where you say ship it. the 9 hours you were asleep weren't downtime, they were capacity - a queue you have to launch by hand becomes your monday. and the key part: at 05:00 the report rewrites that same root - what shipped, what got rejected, what it cost. without that last line this is just a schedule - with it, the schedule improves itself. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and tomorrow starts from a better file than today did ↓
0:50

THE HEAD ENGINEER AT ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE ONE FILE TURNS INTO A FINISHED PRODUCT IN 24 HOURS you hire nobody - you paste a $3.2M file into Fable 5, and the system unrolls itself from there. root → wiring → 4 branches → tests → release → back into the root in the first hour you write 4 things: boundaries, stack, roles, escalation - everything downstream is a consequence of that file. the first 5 hours the system wires itself into tools and only then decides what to build - a team would spread that across two weeks. 8 straight hours run 4 parallel branches with zero meetings - the same block a team fills with standups. by the time you finally open the diff, tests and the critic have already rejected it twice. the changelog is written by the run, not by a human from memory - so it never falls behind the code. your total involvement across the day is exactly 2 hours: the first one, and the one where you say ship it. the 9 hours you were asleep weren't downtime, they were capacity - a queue you have to launch by hand becomes your monday. and the key part: at 05:00 the report rewrites that same root - what shipped, what got rejected, what it cost. without that last line this is just a schedule - with it, the schedule improves itself. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and tomorrow starts from a better file than today did ↓

Sprytix

20,731 views • 1 month ago

With yesterday’s fire at Victorias oil refinery Australia is skating on very thin ice. Albanese needs to take immediate action to get the military to build an oil refinery. The private sector is driven by profit not national security. That’s why Government needs to own and operate essential services along the private sector. We have public schools and hospitals because we know that the private sector won’t build these essential services if they can’t make a buck. You’ve only got to look at bank branch closures and the privatisation of our Insurance offices to see that once completely privatised, services rapidly decline. The same for oil refineries - we need energy for our essential services such as the Military, Health, Policing and Agriculture. Therefore the government has to step in and build refineries as the private sector can’t be trusted to put the national interest first. The same for our state governments. They need to urgently start building coal fired power stations if they want to re-industrialise Australia. The QLD premier is talking about big game when it comes to the Taroom trough but that is years away at best. How about he gets busy and starts building more power stations for the coal that we know we have.
2:13

With yesterday’s fire at Victorias oil refinery Australia is skating on very thin ice. Albanese needs to take immediate action to get the military to build an oil refinery. The private sector is driven by profit not national security. That’s why Government needs to own and operate essential services along the private sector. We have public schools and hospitals because we know that the private sector won’t build these essential services if they can’t make a buck. You’ve only got to look at bank branch closures and the privatisation of our Insurance offices to see that once completely privatised, services rapidly decline. The same for oil refineries - we need energy for our essential services such as the Military, Health, Policing and Agriculture. Therefore the government has to step in and build refineries as the private sector can’t be trusted to put the national interest first. The same for our state governments. They need to urgently start building coal fired power stations if they want to re-industrialise Australia. The QLD premier is talking about big game when it comes to the Taroom trough but that is years away at best. How about he gets busy and starts building more power stations for the coal that we know we have.

Gerard Rennick

27,711 views • 5 months ago

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A PARTICULAR MAN CAN’T CONTROL HIS EMOTIONS. WHEN DID THROWING A TANTRUM BECOME A VALID RESPONSE TO WORDS? An argument at In-N-Out Burger turns into absolute chaos. The guy completely loses it, storms inside, and clocks another guy without hesitation. But it doesn’t stop there. On the way out, he hits an innocent bystander…the kid falls back and his head smacks the concrete. Instead of accountability? He’s rushed by some plump girls into a car and they speed off. HOW DO YOU SWING ON AN INNOCENT PERSON AND CALL YOURSELF A MAN? WHY ARE PEOPLE HELPING SOMEONE ESCAPE INSTEAD OF HOLDING HIM RESPONSIBLE?
1:01

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A PARTICULAR MAN CAN’T CONTROL HIS EMOTIONS. WHEN DID THROWING A TANTRUM BECOME A VALID RESPONSE TO WORDS? An argument at In-N-Out Burger turns into absolute chaos. The guy completely loses it, storms inside, and clocks another guy without hesitation. But it doesn’t stop there. On the way out, he hits an innocent bystander…the kid falls back and his head smacks the concrete. Instead of accountability? He’s rushed by some plump girls into a car and they speed off. HOW DO YOU SWING ON AN INNOCENT PERSON AND CALL YOURSELF A MAN? WHY ARE PEOPLE HELPING SOMEONE ESCAPE INSTEAD OF HOLDING HIM RESPONSIBLE?

𝐌𝐑. 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 ™

166,459 views • 7 months ago

Joe Rogan on why he’ll never let cigarettes (or any addictive habit) into his life: “I know I could get addicted. So I don’t even open the door. Because once that demon gets in, it doesn’t leave easy.” He sees people smoking and thinks: “That’s what you’re doing — you’re letting something terrible into your body that will slowly own you.” The same logic applies to anything that starts small but ends up controlling you. The strongest defense against addiction isn’t just willpower — it’s not giving the habit a single inch in the first place. I’ve come to respect this approach a lot. Sometimes the smartest move is refusing to let certain things into your life at all. What about you — is there something you’ve decided to never let “in the door” because you know it could take over?
0:33

Joe Rogan on why he’ll never let cigarettes (or any addictive habit) into his life: “I know I could get addicted. So I don’t even open the door. Because once that demon gets in, it doesn’t leave easy.” He sees people smoking and thinks: “That’s what you’re doing — you’re letting something terrible into your body that will slowly own you.” The same logic applies to anything that starts small but ends up controlling you. The strongest defense against addiction isn’t just willpower — it’s not giving the habit a single inch in the first place. I’ve come to respect this approach a lot. Sometimes the smartest move is refusing to let certain things into your life at all. What about you — is there something you’ve decided to never let “in the door” because you know it could take over?

Camus

96,468 views • 4 months ago

— Jalen Rose spoke the truth 🔥 “10 scoring titles. 9 First-Team All-Defense. The best offensive player and the best defensive player. Did Michael have to learn how to be the alpha? He had that killer instinct — he didn’t have to go learn it.” — Jalen Rose (ESPN Get Up!, debate with Jay Williams) One thing at a time. First, the numbers. Ten scoring titles. That means he stood at the top of the offensive mountain ten times. At the same time, nine First-Team All-Defense selections. Nine times at the top of the defensive mountain. The same man, in the same career, standing at both peaks at once. That’s the point. Some people dismiss this as “he was well-rounded.” No. Well-rounded means decent at both. Jordan was the best at both. He broke opponents on offense and stopped them on defense. The 1990s NBA still had Detroit’s Jordan Rules — a team literally built a defensive scheme around him. He was still the scoring champion. Still the best defender. That’s the essence of a rivalry. The Bad Boys stopped him three straight years. That humiliation sharpened him. He didn’t leave. Didn’t build a superteam. He sharpened himself. What he relearned wasn’t a textbook on winning. It was the precision of a killer instinct he already had. Then there’s the question: “Did he ever face a guy like LeBron?” That turns the debate into a body catalog. GOAT evidence isn’t an imaginary matchup. It’s 6–0 in the Finals. Two three-peats. The way a series bent toward his presence. The air on the court followed him. The last shot wasn’t outsourced to “the right play.” That instinct can’t be workshopped. So the core of this argument isn’t “who was stronger.” It’s “who dominated both ends at once, and did it with a will he never had to learn.” Not the length of the résumé. The density of the dominance. That’s what decides the winner of history.
1:01

— Jalen Rose spoke the truth 🔥 “10 scoring titles. 9 First-Team All-Defense. The best offensive player and the best defensive player. Did Michael have to learn how to be the alpha? He had that killer instinct — he didn’t have to go learn it.” — Jalen Rose (ESPN Get Up!, debate with Jay Williams) One thing at a time. First, the numbers. Ten scoring titles. That means he stood at the top of the offensive mountain ten times. At the same time, nine First-Team All-Defense selections. Nine times at the top of the defensive mountain. The same man, in the same career, standing at both peaks at once. That’s the point. Some people dismiss this as “he was well-rounded.” No. Well-rounded means decent at both. Jordan was the best at both. He broke opponents on offense and stopped them on defense. The 1990s NBA still had Detroit’s Jordan Rules — a team literally built a defensive scheme around him. He was still the scoring champion. Still the best defender. That’s the essence of a rivalry. The Bad Boys stopped him three straight years. That humiliation sharpened him. He didn’t leave. Didn’t build a superteam. He sharpened himself. What he relearned wasn’t a textbook on winning. It was the precision of a killer instinct he already had. Then there’s the question: “Did he ever face a guy like LeBron?” That turns the debate into a body catalog. GOAT evidence isn’t an imaginary matchup. It’s 6–0 in the Finals. Two three-peats. The way a series bent toward his presence. The air on the court followed him. The last shot wasn’t outsourced to “the right play.” That instinct can’t be workshopped. So the core of this argument isn’t “who was stronger.” It’s “who dominated both ends at once, and did it with a will he never had to learn.” Not the length of the résumé. The density of the dominance. That’s what decides the winner of history.

♣️Jokic & MJ♦️GOATs fan

23,772 views • 11 days ago

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.
4:19

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.

DegenCalls

20,124 views • 2 months ago

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE 6 FILES CUT TOKENS BY 84% AND RAISE ACCURACY BY 39% engineers at Google and Microsoft have been running this for a while - they pay $3 where you pay $20. decisions → contracts → dead ends → state → sources → open questions memory moves outside the window - what enters the context is a pointer to a file, not the history. raw history refills the window to 200k every single turn - six pointers take 8k and leave 96% free. same work, same five turns: 1,000,000 tokens against 40,000. decisions written to a file kill the endless "wait, why did we do it this way". written dead ends kill the second lap around the same circle - the agent never walks in there twice. a stable prefix keeps the cache warm - a cache read costs 0.1x of normal input. that's why 20 turns cost 3.15x instead of 20x - one write and nineteen reads. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and your agent stops paying for what it already knew ↓
0:51

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE 6 FILES CUT TOKENS BY 84% AND RAISE ACCURACY BY 39% engineers at Google and Microsoft have been running this for a while - they pay $3 where you pay $20. decisions → contracts → dead ends → state → sources → open questions memory moves outside the window - what enters the context is a pointer to a file, not the history. raw history refills the window to 200k every single turn - six pointers take 8k and leave 96% free. same work, same five turns: 1,000,000 tokens against 40,000. decisions written to a file kill the endless "wait, why did we do it this way". written dead ends kill the second lap around the same circle - the agent never walks in there twice. a stable prefix keeps the cache warm - a cache read costs 0.1x of normal input. that's why 20 turns cost 3.15x instead of 20x - one write and nineteen reads. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and your agent stops paying for what it already knew ↓

Noisy

137,563 views • 1 month ago

Prince Harry is the worst kind of stupid: arrogant, spiteful, entitled, vindictive, shameless and profoundly disloyal. Meghan Markle is an outsider. She married into the Royal Family, saw the status, privilege and access that came with it, and has spent years trying to squeeze every last drop out of that connection. Nasty? Absolutely. Shameless? Without question. But at least you can understand the self-interest. Harry is different. Harry is family. He grew up inside that family. He knew his grandmother. He knew his father. He grew up beside William. He knew Catherine. He knew exactly who these people were long before Meghan ever walked through the palace gates. And what did he do with that knowledge? He sold it. Oprah. Netflix. Spare. Interviews. Court cases. Private conversations. Family arguments. Childhood memories. Nothing was off limits once there was money, publicity or a grievance to be squeezed out of it. Let’s kill one argument right here: Harry wasn’t some brave outsider exposing a terrible family. He was raised in that family. He was loved by that family. He was protected by that family. He was privileged by that family. He knew these people for decades. From the beginning, Harry and Meghan understood there was one enormous advantage on their side. The Royal Family was never going to fight them in the same way. The Palace wasn’t going to answer every accusation, every interview, every insinuation and every private detail dragged into the public. So they filled the silence with their version of events. The longer it went on, the more the contradictions piled up. Stories changed. Claims were challenged. Details didn’t always match. Yet the narrative kept being pushed because they knew the people on the other side were unlikely to engage in a public back-and-forth. That isn’t “speaking truth to power.” That is exploiting the restraint of a family that cannot, and should not, fight back in the same way. Harry knew exactly what he was doing. He knew his family would protect the institution, protect private family matters & refuse to turn the monarchy into a public mud-slinging contest. And he used that restraint against them. So when Meghan attacked his family, Harry wasn’t some clueless husband blindly repeating things he didn’t understand. He knew them. He chose to scheme beside her while she dragged them. He chose to add his own accusations. He chose the cameras, the contracts, the headlines & the victim narrative. He didn’t just leave. He turned his family into a business model. And the pattern didn’t stop with them. Harry has long treated his mother’s name & legacy as something he can leverage, brand, and redirect whenever it suits him. The same instinct that turned private family life into content has been applied to her memory and the causes once tied to it. Meghan married into the family & exploited the connection. Harry was born into it, benefited from it his entire life, knew exactly what he was betraying, and then sold the betrayal back to the world. That isn’t courage. That isn’t truth-telling. That isn’t “finding his voice.” It’s betrayal. A stranger can hurt you. But a family member who knows your history, knows your vulnerabilities, knows your private life, knows exactly where to hurt you, and then hands all of it to the world for money and attention? That is something else entirely. Harry didn’t just walk away from his family. He monetised attacking them. And somehow, after all of that, he still wants us to believe he’s the victim. No. He isn’t the victim. He tried to destroy their reputation, but the more Harry & Meghan talked, the more people started seeing them for exactly who they are. The contradictions piled up, the self-serving narrative became harder to ignore, & their credibility took the hit. The Royal Family didn’t expose Harry & Meghan. Harry & Meghan exposed themselves. And Harry is still angry that the world didn’t see the Royal Family through his evil eyes.
2:49

Prince Harry is the worst kind of stupid: arrogant, spiteful, entitled, vindictive, shameless and profoundly disloyal. Meghan Markle is an outsider. She married into the Royal Family, saw the status, privilege and access that came with it, and has spent years trying to squeeze every last drop out of that connection. Nasty? Absolutely. Shameless? Without question. But at least you can understand the self-interest. Harry is different. Harry is family. He grew up inside that family. He knew his grandmother. He knew his father. He grew up beside William. He knew Catherine. He knew exactly who these people were long before Meghan ever walked through the palace gates. And what did he do with that knowledge? He sold it. Oprah. Netflix. Spare. Interviews. Court cases. Private conversations. Family arguments. Childhood memories. Nothing was off limits once there was money, publicity or a grievance to be squeezed out of it. Let’s kill one argument right here: Harry wasn’t some brave outsider exposing a terrible family. He was raised in that family. He was loved by that family. He was protected by that family. He was privileged by that family. He knew these people for decades. From the beginning, Harry and Meghan understood there was one enormous advantage on their side. The Royal Family was never going to fight them in the same way. The Palace wasn’t going to answer every accusation, every interview, every insinuation and every private detail dragged into the public. So they filled the silence with their version of events. The longer it went on, the more the contradictions piled up. Stories changed. Claims were challenged. Details didn’t always match. Yet the narrative kept being pushed because they knew the people on the other side were unlikely to engage in a public back-and-forth. That isn’t “speaking truth to power.” That is exploiting the restraint of a family that cannot, and should not, fight back in the same way. Harry knew exactly what he was doing. He knew his family would protect the institution, protect private family matters & refuse to turn the monarchy into a public mud-slinging contest. And he used that restraint against them. So when Meghan attacked his family, Harry wasn’t some clueless husband blindly repeating things he didn’t understand. He knew them. He chose to scheme beside her while she dragged them. He chose to add his own accusations. He chose the cameras, the contracts, the headlines & the victim narrative. He didn’t just leave. He turned his family into a business model. And the pattern didn’t stop with them. Harry has long treated his mother’s name & legacy as something he can leverage, brand, and redirect whenever it suits him. The same instinct that turned private family life into content has been applied to her memory and the causes once tied to it. Meghan married into the family & exploited the connection. Harry was born into it, benefited from it his entire life, knew exactly what he was betraying, and then sold the betrayal back to the world. That isn’t courage. That isn’t truth-telling. That isn’t “finding his voice.” It’s betrayal. A stranger can hurt you. But a family member who knows your history, knows your vulnerabilities, knows your private life, knows exactly where to hurt you, and then hands all of it to the world for money and attention? That is something else entirely. Harry didn’t just walk away from his family. He monetised attacking them. And somehow, after all of that, he still wants us to believe he’s the victim. No. He isn’t the victim. He tried to destroy their reputation, but the more Harry & Meghan talked, the more people started seeing them for exactly who they are. The contradictions piled up, the self-serving narrative became harder to ignore, & their credibility took the hit. The Royal Family didn’t expose Harry & Meghan. Harry & Meghan exposed themselves. And Harry is still angry that the world didn’t see the Royal Family through his evil eyes.

Queen Esther

180,304 views • 1 month ago

4:50 pm in #Kyiv I took this video for you an hour ago or so. In the spring of 2022, when russian troops were approaching Kyiv and cutting off all the evacuation routes, the only way to escape from Irpin and surrounding settlements was the railway. On March 5, 2022 when the train was heading for people from Kyiv to Irpin, russians fired at it. The track was destroyed by a missile and wagons were broken into pieces. Two wagons derailed. Fortunately, there were no passengers in it, no one from the team was injured. Since then, evacuation from Irpin became impossible. The railway bridge across the Irpin River was blown up. By that time, the train had rescued about 10,000 lives. I visited this piece of bravery today 💔 It is on display on Mykhailivska Square. P.S. Irpin was liberated on March 28, 2022.
0:53

4:50 pm in #Kyiv I took this video for you an hour ago or so. In the spring of 2022, when russian troops were approaching Kyiv and cutting off all the evacuation routes, the only way to escape from Irpin and surrounding settlements was the railway. On March 5, 2022 when the train was heading for people from Kyiv to Irpin, russians fired at it. The track was destroyed by a missile and wagons were broken into pieces. Two wagons derailed. Fortunately, there were no passengers in it, no one from the team was injured. Since then, evacuation from Irpin became impossible. The railway bridge across the Irpin River was blown up. By that time, the train had rescued about 10,000 lives. I visited this piece of bravery today 💔 It is on display on Mykhailivska Square. P.S. Irpin was liberated on March 28, 2022.

Yaroslava

25,493 views • 2 years ago

Marc Andreessen: “I’ve only met two people who are completely transparent in public about what they say in private: Elon and Trump.” “When Elon says something, it sounds like crazy shit, but in his mind, it's true. Is he always right? No. Sometimes the rockets crash, sometimes he's wrong. He's human. He's like anybody else. But at least my through line with him, both in what he says in public and what he says in private, is they are the exact same things. He doesn't lie in public about what he believes in private. He's 100% consistent. In my experience, there are two guys who are 100% consistent like that, that I know, Elon and Trump. Whatever you think of them, what they say in private is 100% identical to what they say in public. They are completely transparent. They're completely honest in that way. Again, it's not like they're perfect people, but they're honest in that way. It makes them potentially both [...] powerful leaders [...], because they're both willing to stand up and say the thing that if it's true, it turns out to be the thing in many cases that many or most or almost everyone else actually believes, but nobody was actually willing to say out loud.” From: Marc Andreessen interviewed by Lex Fridman, January 26, 2025
0:55

Marc Andreessen: “I’ve only met two people who are completely transparent in public about what they say in private: Elon and Trump.” “When Elon says something, it sounds like crazy shit, but in his mind, it's true. Is he always right? No. Sometimes the rockets crash, sometimes he's wrong. He's human. He's like anybody else. But at least my through line with him, both in what he says in public and what he says in private, is they are the exact same things. He doesn't lie in public about what he believes in private. He's 100% consistent. In my experience, there are two guys who are 100% consistent like that, that I know, Elon and Trump. Whatever you think of them, what they say in private is 100% identical to what they say in public. They are completely transparent. They're completely honest in that way. Again, it's not like they're perfect people, but they're honest in that way. It makes them potentially both [...] powerful leaders [...], because they're both willing to stand up and say the thing that if it's true, it turns out to be the thing in many cases that many or most or almost everyone else actually believes, but nobody was actually willing to say out loud.” From: Marc Andreessen interviewed by Lex Fridman, January 26, 2025

ELON CLIPS

1,952,810 views • 1 year ago

Beshear: The president finally said something that was true. He said he does not care about the financial situation of the American people. And you know what? The way he governs shows it. The Trump economy is a failure. The only failure that rivals the Trump economy is Trump foreign policy. You look at the imposition of tariffs—Americans have paid 90% of them. It’s been a tax by the president that has made everything cost more. His war with Iran, which he and he alone chose to go into, has skyrocketed the price of not just gasoline, but diesel, making everything more expensive. Every good we ship across the country now costs more. Going to see your family, if you have to take a plane trip, costs a lot more. He won’t help reduce the price of housing through the many different levers he could pull. Why? Because he says we’re not working hard enough. And now he’s telling us that our kids have too many toys. But hey, at least he said something true. He doesn’t care about the American people
1:06

Beshear: The president finally said something that was true. He said he does not care about the financial situation of the American people. And you know what? The way he governs shows it. The Trump economy is a failure. The only failure that rivals the Trump economy is Trump foreign policy. You look at the imposition of tariffs—Americans have paid 90% of them. It’s been a tax by the president that has made everything cost more. His war with Iran, which he and he alone chose to go into, has skyrocketed the price of not just gasoline, but diesel, making everything more expensive. Every good we ship across the country now costs more. Going to see your family, if you have to take a plane trip, costs a lot more. He won’t help reduce the price of housing through the many different levers he could pull. Why? Because he says we’re not working hard enough. And now he’s telling us that our kids have too many toys. But hey, at least he said something true. He doesn’t care about the American people

Acyn

40,630 views • 4 months ago

-- What holds it together -- ✂️PAPER CUTS.- When the image is the end ⤵️ What you bring to life is the journey towards the image: how the pieces come to be as they are. The movement is the idea, and your image in Seedance is the final frame. ---------------------------------------------------- What happens to the object? 1⃣ By the time the object TRANFORMS into something else. It takes place in a continuous shot, a single camera that zooms in slowly and never cuts away. A cut would break the transformation; the hypnotic effect lies precisely in the fact that it doesn’t flicker. Template.- [@.RE IMAGE] is the LAST frame. [GLOBAL] [Technique + light + backdrop + focus]. [Real materials]. One continuous hypnotic transformation — a single take, no cuts. The same [OBJECT A] does not appear in pieces; it [VERB: melts / folds / blooms / dissolves] into [OBJECT B]. Slow surreal dreamlike drift, one unbroken slow push, slight stop-motion shimmer, no snapping. 0-1s: [state A, intact and recognizable]. 1-2.5s: [the change begins — "the same material begins to..."]. 2.5-3.5s: [the change at full — "...becomes..."]. 3.5-5s: [it settles]. The push eases to rest. Locked, exact match to the last frame. [LOGIC RULE] one continuous same-lens push, never cutting. [A] morphs into [B], [details that must not deform] stay legible, no warping. hypnotic drift. SFX: [a sound that also transforms]. no music, normal speed. 2⃣ When one thing LEADS to another, we need each step to be a link in the chain of causality. Template.- [@.RE IMAGE] is the LAST frame. [GLOBAL] [Technique + light + backdrop + focus]. [Real materials]. Hypnotic stop-motion paper cadence, slight frame-step, brisk causal montage, ~1.5s per shot, no naturalistic motion, no slow-mo. [cut] [shot + camera] / [carries on from previous cut] / [ACTION: what it DOES, not how it looks]. SFX: [beat-anchored hit]. [cut] ... (link 2 — chains from link 1) [cut] ... (link 3) [cut] ... (link 4) [cut] ... ease back to reveal / [link 5]. Locked, exact match to the last frame. SFX: ... [LOGIC RULE].- [materials], [what must NOT happen], no warping, [text legible if any]. ~1.5s per shot, no slow-mo. no music.
0:41

-- What holds it together -- ✂️PAPER CUTS.- When the image is the end ⤵️ What you bring to life is the journey towards the image: how the pieces come to be as they are. The movement is the idea, and your image in Seedance is the final frame. ---------------------------------------------------- What happens to the object? 1⃣ By the time the object TRANFORMS into something else. It takes place in a continuous shot, a single camera that zooms in slowly and never cuts away. A cut would break the transformation; the hypnotic effect lies precisely in the fact that it doesn’t flicker. Template.- [@.RE IMAGE] is the LAST frame. [GLOBAL] [Technique + light + backdrop + focus]. [Real materials]. One continuous hypnotic transformation — a single take, no cuts. The same [OBJECT A] does not appear in pieces; it [VERB: melts / folds / blooms / dissolves] into [OBJECT B]. Slow surreal dreamlike drift, one unbroken slow push, slight stop-motion shimmer, no snapping. 0-1s: [state A, intact and recognizable]. 1-2.5s: [the change begins — "the same material begins to..."]. 2.5-3.5s: [the change at full — "...becomes..."]. 3.5-5s: [it settles]. The push eases to rest. Locked, exact match to the last frame. [LOGIC RULE] one continuous same-lens push, never cutting. [A] morphs into [B], [details that must not deform] stay legible, no warping. hypnotic drift. SFX: [a sound that also transforms]. no music, normal speed. 2⃣ When one thing LEADS to another, we need each step to be a link in the chain of causality. Template.- [@.RE IMAGE] is the LAST frame. [GLOBAL] [Technique + light + backdrop + focus]. [Real materials]. Hypnotic stop-motion paper cadence, slight frame-step, brisk causal montage, ~1.5s per shot, no naturalistic motion, no slow-mo. [cut] [shot + camera] / [carries on from previous cut] / [ACTION: what it DOES, not how it looks]. SFX: [beat-anchored hit]. [cut] ... (link 2 — chains from link 1) [cut] ... (link 3) [cut] ... (link 4) [cut] ... ease back to reveal / [link 5]. Locked, exact match to the last frame. SFX: ... [LOGIC RULE].- [materials], [what must NOT happen], no warping, [text legible if any]. ~1.5s per shot, no slow-mo. no music.

AlexandrIA

41,804 views • 2 months ago

Oh really? 1. What did your co host mean when he said "the Jews that need to be listened to in this moment are the ones that reject Zionism,"? 2. Does your co-host laugh at Muslim majority countries in the same way he laughs at the singular Jewish majority country? 3. Why did you laugh at the thought of White Nationalists believing that the Jews are behind the Great Replacement Theory while at the same time you unironically believe in ZOG?!!??!?!? Also, just an FYI, If you react by saying that anything bad that is said or happens to you is the fault of Zionist AI bots you might have lost the plot. You don't have to be a Zionist to think you're a dim witted spoiled brat who stumbled their way out of her Daddy's Mercedes into the easiest life imaginable only to end up a hateful bigot. Get fucked. P.S. Please tell your parents I am so sorry they wasted all that money sending you to $40k/year private elementary school.
1:24

Oh really? 1. What did your co host mean when he said "the Jews that need to be listened to in this moment are the ones that reject Zionism,"? 2. Does your co-host laugh at Muslim majority countries in the same way he laughs at the singular Jewish majority country? 3. Why did you laugh at the thought of White Nationalists believing that the Jews are behind the Great Replacement Theory while at the same time you unironically believe in ZOG?!!??!?!? Also, just an FYI, If you react by saying that anything bad that is said or happens to you is the fault of Zionist AI bots you might have lost the plot. You don't have to be a Zionist to think you're a dim witted spoiled brat who stumbled their way out of her Daddy's Mercedes into the easiest life imaginable only to end up a hateful bigot. Get fucked. P.S. Please tell your parents I am so sorry they wasted all that money sending you to $40k/year private elementary school.

usurp tha chef

17,260 views • 23 days ago

MARCH&MARCH IS NOT A COUNTER-REVOLUTION By Dr. Zamani Saul, Northern Cape ANC Provincial Chairperson. 08 July 2026. First, it is essential to acknowledge the politically astute and proactive manner in which the national government responded to the 30 June ultimatum for undocumented migrants to leave. What the government did was to reframe the protests of March&March into a vital grievance mechanism rather than a challenge to the legitimacy of the State. The government acknowledged that there is a slow pace in addressing the frustrations raised by March&March and, in the same vein, equally condemned any form of unlawful and violent activities directed to other people and property. The message was loud and clear that those participants in March&March programmes who embark on illegal and violent activities will be arrested. Conversely, the Arab leaders who were engulfed by the Arab Spring in North Africa and the Middle East chose to deploy delegitimising tactics when confronted with a similar situation as South Africa. When the Arab Spring of 2011 started, the political establishment accused the organisers of being “guided and influenced by the dirty hand of the West” with an “anti-Islamic agenda.” Instead of responding to the triggers of the uprising, they dismissed the popular dissent as foreign-funded subversion. This was followed by extensive investigations of bank accounts of the organisers and a securitisation process that ultimately led to violent crackdowns. So, what was labeled as foreign-funded subversion became a turning point for the Arab world. The negative labeling by the political establishment in Tunisia was based on a disastrous misunderstanding of the impact of social agency of the marginalised masses yearning for change. The whole Arab Spring started when a young man aged 26, Tayeb Mohamed Bouazizi, a fruit and vegetable street vendor in Tunisia, burned himself to death when local police confiscated his cart and humiliated him when he tried to get it back; that is when protests started and spread throughout Tunisia. To access the full article, please log in 👇🏿
1:25

MARCH&MARCH IS NOT A COUNTER-REVOLUTION By Dr. Zamani Saul, Northern Cape ANC Provincial Chairperson. 08 July 2026. First, it is essential to acknowledge the politically astute and proactive manner in which the national government responded to the 30 June ultimatum for undocumented migrants to leave. What the government did was to reframe the protests of March&March into a vital grievance mechanism rather than a challenge to the legitimacy of the State. The government acknowledged that there is a slow pace in addressing the frustrations raised by March&March and, in the same vein, equally condemned any form of unlawful and violent activities directed to other people and property. The message was loud and clear that those participants in March&March programmes who embark on illegal and violent activities will be arrested. Conversely, the Arab leaders who were engulfed by the Arab Spring in North Africa and the Middle East chose to deploy delegitimising tactics when confronted with a similar situation as South Africa. When the Arab Spring of 2011 started, the political establishment accused the organisers of being “guided and influenced by the dirty hand of the West” with an “anti-Islamic agenda.” Instead of responding to the triggers of the uprising, they dismissed the popular dissent as foreign-funded subversion. This was followed by extensive investigations of bank accounts of the organisers and a securitisation process that ultimately led to violent crackdowns. So, what was labeled as foreign-funded subversion became a turning point for the Arab world. The negative labeling by the political establishment in Tunisia was based on a disastrous misunderstanding of the impact of social agency of the marginalised masses yearning for change. The whole Arab Spring started when a young man aged 26, Tayeb Mohamed Bouazizi, a fruit and vegetable street vendor in Tunisia, burned himself to death when local police confiscated his cart and humiliated him when he tried to get it back; that is when protests started and spread throughout Tunisia. To access the full article, please log in 👇🏿

Dr. Zamani Saul

15,693 views • 2 months ago

context engineering vs graph engineering. every few months the list gets a new word and everyone treats it as a replacement for the last one. these two are not on the same list. one decides what the model sees this turn, the other decides what exists at all. the cleanest way to tell them apart is to ask what a single unit of work looks like. > context engineering is the window the window opens empty, every single time. you assemble what goes in it. the prompt, the docs, the history, the tool results. the assembling is the work. the window only grows. it never shrinks on its own, so eventually something gets dropped. usually from the middle. usually without telling you. then the turn ends and the window is thrown away. not archived, thrown away. the next turn opens empty again and you re-explain what you already explained. good context engineering is knowing what to leave out, not what to pack in. the unit of work is one window. > graph engineering is the structure the same material arrives from the same sources. instead of packing it into a window, you pull entities out of it, resolve the duplicates into one node, and write typed edges between them. nothing here is stored as text you hope to find again. it is stored as a thing with a name and its connections to other things. when the turn ends, the graph is still there. the next turn does not start from zero. it starts by querying what already exists, and the query walks edges instead of guessing at similarity. good graph engineering is deciding what counts as the same thing twice. the unit of work is one relationship. > they are not alternatives the graph is what refills the window. context engineering decides what fits. graph engineering decides what there is to choose from. remove the graph and every session starts blind. remove the context work and the best structure in the world arrives as an unreadable dump. that also tells you which one broke. the answer drifted from what you actually said, or forgot something from this same session. that is the window. the answer is coherent but invents a connection that does not exist, or cannot join two facts it has clearly seen. that is the structure. people debug the prompt because the prompt is the easiest thing to edit. it keeps taking the blame for failures that live a layer down. save this - then read the full breakdown below
0:40

context engineering vs graph engineering. every few months the list gets a new word and everyone treats it as a replacement for the last one. these two are not on the same list. one decides what the model sees this turn, the other decides what exists at all. the cleanest way to tell them apart is to ask what a single unit of work looks like. > context engineering is the window the window opens empty, every single time. you assemble what goes in it. the prompt, the docs, the history, the tool results. the assembling is the work. the window only grows. it never shrinks on its own, so eventually something gets dropped. usually from the middle. usually without telling you. then the turn ends and the window is thrown away. not archived, thrown away. the next turn opens empty again and you re-explain what you already explained. good context engineering is knowing what to leave out, not what to pack in. the unit of work is one window. > graph engineering is the structure the same material arrives from the same sources. instead of packing it into a window, you pull entities out of it, resolve the duplicates into one node, and write typed edges between them. nothing here is stored as text you hope to find again. it is stored as a thing with a name and its connections to other things. when the turn ends, the graph is still there. the next turn does not start from zero. it starts by querying what already exists, and the query walks edges instead of guessing at similarity. good graph engineering is deciding what counts as the same thing twice. the unit of work is one relationship. > they are not alternatives the graph is what refills the window. context engineering decides what fits. graph engineering decides what there is to choose from. remove the graph and every session starts blind. remove the context work and the best structure in the world arrives as an unreadable dump. that also tells you which one broke. the answer drifted from what you actually said, or forgot something from this same session. that is the window. the answer is coherent but invents a connection that does not exist, or cannot join two facts it has clearly seen. that is the structure. people debug the prompt because the prompt is the easiest thing to edit. it keeps taking the blame for failures that live a layer down. save this - then read the full breakdown below

Hanako

19,160 views • 1 month ago