Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 built the same scroll-animated website from one skill in 32 minutes. Only one of them made it feel like a film. Same prompt. Boutique Japan travel brand, origami style. A subway pulls in, a paper house unfolds into a hotel, a bird takes flight as...

48,091 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,405 views • 1 month ago

REAL ESTATE PEOPLE WILL HATE HIM FOR THIS. HE BUILT A CLAUDE AGENT THAT TURNS ANY LISTING INTO A SELLABLE VIDEO ON ITS OWN Playbook: connect Claude to a video generator, paste a listing, get a cinematic tour of every room, sell it to the agent But typing the prompt for every listing doesn't scale. He turned it into a skill his Claude runs on its own Here's how to build the automated version: 1. Connect the video engine once. In Claude, go to Customize, Connectors, Add Custom Connector, name it Higgsfield, and paste the server URL from higgsfield. ai/mcp. Authenticate through your account. No API keys. Now Claude can generate video straight from chat 2. Turn the workflow into a skill. Instead of pasting the same prompt every time, have Claude build a skill. Tell it: "Create a skill called listing-to-video. When I give it a listing URL, scrape the room photos, generate a cinematic clip of each room with Higgsfield, and save them to a folder." Now the whole process is one command, not a wall of text 3. Let the agent run the listing. Hand it a URL and say "run listing-to-video on this." It pulls the photos, fires each room through the video model, and brings the clips back. You wrote the prompt once, inside the skill. You never write it again 4. Stitch and deliver. Drop the clips together into one tour. Send a free sample to the listing's agent, then charge per video or a monthly rate for ongoing listings 5. Scale it with your team. Add a skill that drafts the outreach email and one that builds a simple landing page for the agent. Now one operator runs sourcing, production, and pitching from a single Claude session The edge isn't generating one video. It's building the skill once so every future listing runs itself Bookmark this

Yarchi

54,840 views • 1 month ago

Apple's product pages have that scroll effect. The camera flies through a 3D world. Products float. Scenes transition. No cuts. One continuous flight driven by your scroll wheel. Here is what one costs to build in 2026. Big storytelling agencies (Noomo, WithLore, Utsubo): $15,000 to $100,000. Three to six months. A team of designers, 3D artists, and WebGL developers. Awwwards-tier flagship from a senior freelancer: $8,000 minimum. Three.js multi-scene site with GSAP scroll: $3,500 to $8,000. That is if you can find a Three.js specialist. They charge $75 to $150 an hour. There are fewer of them than there are brands that want the site. Now meet scroll-world. A free, open-source agent skill for Claude Code and Codex that generates the entire thing from a prompt. Describe your brand. Describe the scenes. "A coffee brand. Start outside the farm. Fly into the roasting facility. Pass through the packaging. Land in the cafe." It generates the isometric stills. It generates the camera flights. It generates the connector clips between scenes from the actual boundary frames of both neighbors, so every seam is pixel-identical. No flicker. No cut. One continuous flight. Then it wires the chain into a portable vanilla JS scroll engine that drops into plain HTML, Next.js, or Vue. One prompt. Hours. Not months. 6,096 stars on GitHub in 25 days. 724 forks. MIT license. Built by cyw, founder and CTO of Hermai AI, out of San Francisco. Here is what scroll-world does: - Interviews you on brand, scenes, art direction, and budget before spending a cent - Generates the isometric stills through GPT Image 2 - Generates the camera flights through Seedance on Monid - Renders a native 9:16 portrait chain for mobile, not a crop - Ships a vanilla JS scrub engine with blob-seek, lazy load, and seam crossfade - Installs into Claude Code as a plugin or Codex through the Vercel skills CLI - Framework-agnostic Here is what scroll-world costs to install: Zero. Forever. Generation burns credits. A 6-scene 1080p chain on Monid pay-per-clip lands around $27, printed before the run starts. Big storytelling agency: $15,000 to $100,000. scroll-world: $27. Awwwards WebGL flagship: $8,000. scroll-world: $27. Three.js contractor for a month: $12,000. scroll-world: this afternoon. Your brand. Your world. Your scroll. 100% Open Source. (Link in the comments)

Nav Toor

346,096 views • 5 days ago

how to use Google's NEW open source Design.md + AI Skills to make your startup look like a $100 million company in 1 hour: 1. Design.md is an open source file from Google that captures the soul of a design. Typography, colors, spacing, all in one markdown file. You attach it to your prompt and your agent builds beautiful things every time. 2. Think of it this way. The HTML is the finished dish. The design.md is the recipe. The skills are the ingredients. Put them together and everything you build looks consistent and professional. 3. Don't create a design system from scratch. Find a brand you love. Linear, Stripe, Vercel, whatever resonates. Study it. Use ChatGPT or Claude to help you extract the design language into your own design.md file. 4. Build skills on top of your design.md. A landing page skill. A mobile app skill. A motion design skill. A slide deck skill. Each one references the same design.md so everything looks like it came from the same designer. 5. The biggest mistake people make: they nail one screen and then everything else looks generic. Design.md solves this. One file keeps every page, every format, every medium consistent. 6. Use it across everything. Your landing page. Your app. Your pitch deck. Your promo videos. Same DNA. Same taste. Same system. That's what separates a startup that looks real from one that looks vibe-coded. 7. Build a second brain for design inspiration. When you see something beautiful in the real world or online, capture it. Save it. When you're building something new, reference it. Taste is developed, not downloaded. 8. It's obvious but the difference between a product people trust and a product people bounce from is how it looks and feels. Design.md gives you that edge. you can watch below shoutout to Meng To for coming on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 and walking through his full workflow. if you want to use AI to actually build gorgeous designs, you'll want to use see this. watch

GREG ISENBERG

507,677 views • 3 months ago