Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Fable 5.1 + Opus 5

Evan

1,223 subscribers

2,001,296 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Science & Technology Gaming

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

36 Comments

Boris Cherny1 month ago

Oh LOVE this vibe. Like superhot as a doodle

Evan1 month ago

It’s going live w/ multiplayer this weekend. If you want to hop on I’ll send you the link!

itchy1 month ago

holy fuck this is sick, can you share a repo?

Eddi1 month ago

Honestly I think I like this better than any other AI shooter demo I have seen. I could see myself play this.

Paulius 🏴‍☠️1 month ago

can we get this multiplayer

Evan1 month ago

Going to make this publicly available and add multiplayer this weekend. Stay tuned!

Evan1 month ago

Play the game here:

Joshhfm1 month ago

Paper Strike I need the multiplayer

Lukitun.xyz1 month ago

wow such XII vibes

Adrian Phan1 month ago

looks like we finally completed the loop back to where we began with Nvidia GPU's powering the masterpiece Counter-Strike (CS) 1.5

Aaron Mathew Philip1 month ago

If you are saying the truth this is absolutely crazy

alexis1 month ago

hey bro here’s my fable 5.1 shooter slop that i will forget about in two weeks

Hassan1 month ago

best ai shooter I seen so far

Divyanshu1 month ago

damm never thought about shooter game in this theme

LancerEvoX1 month ago

Damn, I need the source code for taht

Sasikumar student1 month ago

Need GitHub repo link

Sooraj Narayan1 month ago

nice creativity

Ma Ga Re1 month ago

Beautiful.

XΞNTINΔL1 month ago

Nice

Nuno Pereira1 month ago

This is trully beautiful.

Ashish1 month ago

That's amazing idea and concept for a fps game.

Rahul1 month ago

Would make a good game for the browser

Bilal Bakr1 month ago

Looks good, but man Astra can 100% one shot this in better ways

Mark Attar1 month ago

Awesome job this has polish

murat 🍥1 month ago

well done

Anurag1 month ago

I liked it a lot :)

Armaan1 month ago

add GPT-6 Astra and you'll have GTA 6

fkz1 month ago

Repo+prompt pls this is fantastic

zackbuilds1 month ago

two model names and 290k views. people really want to see what these tools can do in a game now

G.M1 month ago

Cool

Entadion 🌼1 month ago

This looks like a real jump in what models can do inside a game. What was harder here - understanding the scene or controlling the actions in real time?

Nebulizer1 month ago

so this is where my compute went

路人甲1 month ago

I want a github link🤘👍

milksense – oss/acc1 month ago

that's insane 🫶

Linzec1 month ago

太厉害了

Rogue Puddle1 month ago

Woah this is sooo cool I can’t waiiit to play the next three.js slop

Related Videos

I built my fire truck game again with fable 5.1 instead of opus 5. Same idea as It used two full weekly fable 5.1 rate limits, and it’s ok, a bit better then opus 5 but just not usable at all on a max 20 plan…

I built my fire truck game again with fable 5.1 instead of opus 5. Same idea as It used two full weekly fable 5.1 rate limits, and it’s ok, a bit better then opus 5 but just not usable at all on a max 20 plan…

Jake Verbaten

29,313 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Chris

14,745 views • 1 month ago

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Tim Jayas

840,774 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5.1 vs. Fable 5 in shadow animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Fable 5.1 vs. Fable 5 in shadow animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

58,872 views • 1 month ago

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Claude

29,381,963 views • 1 month ago

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 views • 1 month ago

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

K2S

242,890 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Bhavy☄️

32,985 views • 1 month ago

Claude Opus 5.5 just ONE SHOT a Mario Kart game. The result is way better than Fable 5.1. The attention to detail is on another level. Opus 5.5 actually created real characters. Mario, Luigi, in the game, playable. Fable 5.1 has never done that. Insanely impressed. This model is different.

Claude Opus 5.5 just ONE SHOT a Mario Kart game. The result is way better than Fable 5.1. The attention to detail is on another level. Opus 5.5 actually created real characters. Mario, Luigi, in the game, playable. Fable 5.1 has never done that. Insanely impressed. This model is different.

BridgeMind

379,223 views • 1 month ago

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Addy Osmani

419,644 views • 1 month ago

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

304,002 views • 3 months ago

$Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.$

Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.

Dan McAteer

156,614 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5.1 everyone

Fable 5.1 everyone

m0dE

34,845 views • 1 month ago

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

99,417 views • 1 month ago

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Ahad Shams | AI Ads Guy

47,773 views • 3 months ago

Fable 5.1 is incredible.

Fable 5.1 is incredible.

Theo - t3.gg

126,485 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Fable 5.1 launched

🚨 Fable 5.1 launched

Chetaslua

41,416 views • 1 month ago

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

BridgeMind

1,310,052 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5.1 Minecraft one-shot

Fable 5.1 Minecraft one-shot

spicylemonade

342,071 views • 1 month ago

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

BridgeMind

188,973 views • 3 months ago