正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Fable 5.1 + Opus 5

Evan

1,160 subscribers

1,986,309 次观看 • 9 天前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术科学技术游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

36 条评论

Boris Cherny 的头像

Boris Cherny8 天前

Oh LOVE this vibe. Like superhot as a doodle

Evan 的头像

Evan8 天前

It’s going live w/ multiplayer this weekend. If you want to hop on I’ll send you the link!

itchy 的头像

itchy9 天前

holy fuck this is sick, can you share a repo?

Eddi 的头像

Eddi9 天前

Honestly I think I like this better than any other AI shooter demo I have seen. I could see myself play this.

Paulius 🏴‍☠️ 的头像

Paulius 🏴‍☠️9 天前

can we get this multiplayer

Evan 的头像

Evan9 天前

Going to make this publicly available and add multiplayer this weekend. Stay tuned!

Evan 的头像

Evan7 天前

Play the game here:

Joshhfm 的头像

Joshhfm9 天前

Paper Strike I need the multiplayer

Lukitun.xyz 的头像

Lukitun.xyz9 天前

wow such XII vibes

Adrian Phan 的头像

Adrian Phan9 天前

looks like we finally completed the loop back to where we began with Nvidia GPU's powering the masterpiece Counter-Strike (CS) 1.5

Aaron Mathew Philip 的头像

Aaron Mathew Philip9 天前

If you are saying the truth this is absolutely crazy

alexis 的头像

alexis9 天前

hey bro here’s my fable 5.1 shooter slop that i will forget about in two weeks

Hassan 的头像

Hassan9 天前

best ai shooter I seen so far

Divyanshu 的头像

Divyanshu9 天前

damm never thought about shooter game in this theme

LancerEvoX 的头像

LancerEvoX9 天前

Damn, I need the source code for taht

Sasikumar student 的头像

Sasikumar student9 天前

Need GitHub repo link

Sooraj Narayan 的头像

Sooraj Narayan9 天前

nice creativity

Ma Ga Re 的头像

Ma Ga Re9 天前

Beautiful.

XΞNTINΔL 的头像

XΞNTINΔL6 天前

Nice

Nuno Pereira 的头像

Nuno Pereira9 天前

This is trully beautiful.

Ashish 的头像

Ashish9 天前

That's amazing idea and concept for a fps game.

Rahul 的头像

Rahul9 天前

Would make a good game for the browser

Bilal Bakr 的头像

Bilal Bakr8 天前

Looks good, but man Astra can 100% one shot this in better ways

Mark Attar 的头像

Mark Attar9 天前

Awesome job this has polish

murat 🍥 的头像

murat 🍥9 天前

well done

Anurag 的头像

Anurag6 天前

I liked it a lot :)

Armaan 的头像

Armaan9 天前

add GPT-6 Astra and you'll have GTA 6

fkz 的头像

fkz9 天前

Repo+prompt pls this is fantastic

zackbuilds 的头像

zackbuilds9 天前

two model names and 290k views. people really want to see what these tools can do in a game now

G.M 的头像

G.M6 天前

Cool

Entadion 🌼 的头像

Entadion 🌼9 天前

This looks like a real jump in what models can do inside a game. What was harder here - understanding the scene or controlling the actions in real time?

Nebulizer 的头像

Nebulizer9 天前

so this is where my compute went

路人甲的头像

路人甲9 天前

I want a github link🤘👍

milksense – oss/acc 的头像

milksense – oss/acc4 天前

that's insane 🫶

Linzec 的头像

Linzec9 天前

太厉害了

Rogue Puddle 的头像

Rogue Puddle8 天前

Woah this is sooo cool I can’t waiiit to play the next three.js slop

相关视频

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Chris

14,745 次观看 • 9 天前

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Tim Jayas

826,364 次观看 • 9 天前

Fable 5.1 vs. Fable 5 in shadow animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Fable 5.1 vs. Fable 5 in shadow animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

58,537 次观看 • 11 天前

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 次观看 • 10 天前

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

303,950 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Ahad Shams

47,648 次观看 • 1 个月前

$Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.$

Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.

Dan McAteer

154,449 次观看 • 11 天前

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

98,232 次观看 • 11 天前

Fable 5.1 everyone

Fable 5.1 everyone

m0dE

34,623 次观看 • 9 天前

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

BridgeMind

188,558 次观看 • 1 个月前

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

sui

262,574 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.1 is incredible.

Fable 5.1 is incredible.

Theo - t3.gg

123,560 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 Fable 5.1 launched

🚨 Fable 5.1 launched

Chetaslua

41,416 次观看 • 12 天前

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5, round 3. same prompt: "create Apple's next launch email flow for a brand new product, 12 emails, using Nitrosend." both of them invented a product Apple doesn't make. Opus 5 is getting rave reviews this week...Opus or Fable here?

George Hartley ☄️

75,391 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

BridgeMind

1,305,294 次观看 • 11 天前

Fable 5 bugün üyeliklere kapandı ama hala kullanmanın bir yolu var 🔥 Bu hazırladığım repo sayesinde Opus 4.8’i kullanıp Fable 5 seviyesinde sonuçlar alabiliyorsunuz 20 farklı işlemde test ettim Opus + bu repo vs Fable 5 aynısını yapınca benzer sonuçlar aldı Detaylar aşağıda

Fable 5 bugün üyeliklere kapandı ama hala kullanmanın bir yolu var 🔥 Bu hazırladığım repo sayesinde Opus 4.8’i kullanıp Fable 5 seviyesinde sonuçlar alabiliyorsunuz 20 farklı işlemde test ettim Opus + bu repo vs Fable 5 aynısını yapınca benzer sonuçlar aldı Detaylar aşağıda

Esad Kılıç

20,589 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is a tutorial a 12 min on how Build 3D Websites in Minutes with Al (0 Design + 0 Coding) with Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 are massive

This is a tutorial a 12 min on how Build 3D Websites in Minutes with Al (0 Design + 0 Coding) with Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 are massive

FHILY👑

49,063 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5.1 Minecraft one-shot

Fable 5.1 Minecraft one-shot

spicylemonade

341,003 次观看 • 12 天前

One shot prompt with no loops: GPT-Sol Ultra: 35,192,545 tokens used Opus 5.0 Ultracode: 1,171,676,041 tokens used Fable 5.1 Ultracode: 127,366,207 tokensused Same prompt… different results: Fable 5.1 runs at 5fps so I had to speed it up to demonstrate the rendering. Would need further optimisation. Opus 5.0 runs very nicely on first prompt. Doesn't need much in terms of performance optimisation. Just a few odd visual things here and there. My verdict: Fable looks impressive but struggles to run smoothly. Opus is a solid model when prompted properly. Sol is garbage.

One shot prompt with no loops: GPT-Sol Ultra: 35,192,545 tokens used Opus 5.0 Ultracode: 1,171,676,041 tokens used Fable 5.1 Ultracode: 127,366,207 tokensused Same prompt… different results: Fable 5.1 runs at 5fps so I had to speed it up to demonstrate the rendering. Would need further optimisation. Opus 5.0 runs very nicely on first prompt. Doesn't need much in terms of performance optimisation. Just a few odd visual things here and there. My verdict: Fable looks impressive but struggles to run smoothly. Opus is a solid model when prompted properly. Sol is garbage.

Adam Lyttle

590,973 次观看 • 9 天前

Opus 5.1 Output on my ballista prompt for comparison with opus 5 i have quoted the post and its super slow in my mac

Opus 5.1 Output on my ballista prompt for comparison with opus 5 i have quoted the post and its super slow in my mac

Chetaslua

40,199 次观看 • 15 天前