Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Chris

65,874 subscribers

14,745 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

98,232 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Fable 5.1 crushed. However... - 50% more expensive than Fable 5 - 2.2x more token use - 2x slower to complete - First to watermark your code - Less beautiful output

Fable 5.1 crushed. However... - 50% more expensive than Fable 5 - 2.2x more token use - 2x slower to complete - First to watermark your code - Less beautiful output

Justin Schroeder

15,336 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

BridgeMind

1,305,294 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 I gave 3 same prompts to both, here are the results IMO, both created beautiful scenes, but the color picking problem is still there in Fable 5.1. Kimi K3 is better at this. Fable: ~$12/scene | Kimi: <$5/scene More tests coming up

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 I gave 3 same prompts to both, here are the results IMO, both created beautiful scenes, but the color picking problem is still there in Fable 5.1. Kimi K3 is better at this. Fable: ~$12/scene | Kimi: <$5/scene More tests coming up

Bhavy☄️

81,655 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

New Fable 5.1 absolutely crushed Fable 5 at making a racing game👾🔥 Claude just dropped Fable 5.1, so we gave both models the same prompt to build a playable racing game from scratch in Godot with BlenderMCP Tasks: - Make car and environment models using BlenderMCP - A big map for long driving sessions - Realistic car handling - Simple HUD for speed and controls Outputs: Fable 5.1: 1.2M tokens, 123.98$, 59.8 minutes Fable 5: 897K tokens, 95.87, 57.3 minutes Fable 5.1's models are far more detailed and the game runs smooth, the world feels alive while you drive. Fable 5 finished all three tasks and its HUD and controls work, but its models are plain and the game feels stiff

New Fable 5.1 absolutely crushed Fable 5 at making a racing game👾🔥 Claude just dropped Fable 5.1, so we gave both models the same prompt to build a playable racing game from scratch in Godot with BlenderMCP Tasks: - Make car and environment models using BlenderMCP - A big map for long driving sessions - Realistic car handling - Simple HUD for speed and controls Outputs: Fable 5.1: 1.2M tokens, 123.98$, 59.8 minutes Fable 5: 897K tokens, 95.87, 57.3 minutes Fable 5.1's models are far more detailed and the game runs smooth, the world feels alive while you drive. Fable 5 finished all three tasks and its HUD and controls work, but its models are plain and the game feels stiff

atomic.chat

21,216 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

I WAS WRONG, FABLE-5.1 MIGHT ACTUALLY BE THE BEST MODEL TO EXIST ON THIS PLANET FOR FRONTEND TOO 😭 Tried recreating the exact same game with Fable-5.1 and Kimi K3. Fable-5.1 outclassed Kimi K3 on UI and gameplay. Smoother mechanics, better interactions, and noticeably more polished overall. Kimi was still competitive, especially with way fewer jitters during gameplay. Cost: - Kimi K3: ~$11 - Fable-5.1: ~$18 That’s ~60% more cost for Fable, but the quality difference was actually noticeable. Kimi is still ridiculously competitive for the price.

I WAS WRONG, FABLE-5.1 MIGHT ACTUALLY BE THE BEST MODEL TO EXIST ON THIS PLANET FOR FRONTEND TOO 😭 Tried recreating the exact same game with Fable-5.1 and Kimi K3. Fable-5.1 outclassed Kimi K3 on UI and gameplay. Smoother mechanics, better interactions, and noticeably more polished overall. Kimi was still competitive, especially with way fewer jitters during gameplay. Cost: - Kimi K3: ~$11 - Fable-5.1: ~$18 That’s ~60% more cost for Fable, but the quality difference was actually noticeable. Kimi is still ridiculously competitive for the price.

aditya

367,260 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

hiraeth

36,888 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

403,637 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Spaceship Demo - Fable 5 vs Ox Alpha Fable 5 clearly still has the upper hand. It’s monumentally better when it comes to producing beautiful, polished game demos in general. I can safely say this model is above 5.5 and 5.6 in terms of producing the most coherent demo on the first attempt. The fact that it’s free is kind of mind blowing, but Fable 5 is still so far ahead of the pack on coding that Anthropic genuinely cooked.

Spaceship Demo - Fable 5 vs Ox Alpha Fable 5 clearly still has the upper hand. It’s monumentally better when it comes to producing beautiful, polished game demos in general. I can safely say this model is above 5.5 and 5.6 in terms of producing the most coherent demo on the first attempt. The fact that it’s free is kind of mind blowing, but Fable 5 is still so far ahead of the pack on coding that Anthropic genuinely cooked.

Chris

43,523 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Fable 5.1 is an absolute beast for game dev. I took my Opus 5 space game and told Fable to "just make it look better". It overhauled everything with a TON of detail, AND made it 2x faster 🤯 Code: Demo: Every pixel you see is made by AI. Fable modeled everything in Blender, generated textures with code, and in a few cases ran image models via CLI. In mere months we'll be vibe-coding AAA graphics at this rate. Just insane. Of course, Fable recorded and edited this comparison video too (with a little help from Opus at the end, because of the Fable outage)

Fable 5.1 is an absolute beast for game dev. I took my Opus 5 space game and told Fable to "just make it look better". It overhauled everything with a TON of detail, AND made it 2x faster 🤯 Code: Demo: Every pixel you see is made by AI. Fable modeled everything in Blender, generated textures with code, and in a few cases ran image models via CLI. In mere months we'll be vibe-coding AAA graphics at this rate. Just insane. Of course, Fable recorded and edited this comparison video too (with a little help from Opus at the end, because of the Fable outage)

Anshu

48,983 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Did I just unlock claude-fable-5-lite? 😂 Since Fable 5 got pulled (US export control order, Anthropic is contesting it), I wanted to see how much of its character lives in the system prompt vs. the model itself. I ran the leaked Fable 5 prompt on Opus 4.8 head-to-head against stock 4.8.

Did I just unlock claude-fable-5-lite? 😂 Since Fable 5 got pulled (US export control order, Anthropic is contesting it), I wanted to see how much of its character lives in the system prompt vs. the model itself. I ran the leaked Fable 5 prompt on Opus 4.8 head-to-head against stock 4.8.

Jamieson O'Reilly

2,735,378 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GPT-6 Astra smokes Claude Fable 5.1 in Blender 💨 We compared GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 on a Porsche 911 GT3 RS build and the difference is visible from the very first shot Output: Astra: $132.03 • 2.58 hours Fable: $114.41 • 2.56 hours Astra's model is not only more detailed in every aspect, but also far closer to the original car, costing almost the same as Fable's blocky funny looking model, the difference is astonishing

GPT-6 Astra smokes Claude Fable 5.1 in Blender 💨 We compared GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 on a Porsche 911 GT3 RS build and the difference is visible from the very first shot Output: Astra: $132.03 • 2.58 hours Fable: $114.41 • 2.56 hours Astra's model is not only more detailed in every aspect, but also far closer to the original car, costing almost the same as Fable's blocky funny looking model, the difference is astonishing

atomic.chat

130,515 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

Bhavy☄️

33,971 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

We made Fable 5.1 compete against Entelligence Router on the same coding task. Both had the same harness and infra, and had to build a GeoGuessr-style game from scratch, implement the interactions, and verify everything in the browser. Fable 5.1: 21 min, $22.16 Entelligence Router: 21 min, $9 Fable delivered a strong result, although we did run into some overlay bugs along the way. Entelligence got the same task done at 59% lower cost.

We made Fable 5.1 compete against Entelligence Router on the same coding task. Both had the same harness and infra, and had to build a GeoGuessr-style game from scratch, implement the interactions, and verify everything in the browser. Fable 5.1: 21 min, $22.16 Entelligence Router: 21 min, $9 Fable delivered a strong result, although we did run into some overlay bugs along the way. Entelligence got the same task done at 59% lower cost.

Entelligence AI

16,627 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

GPT 6 Astra one shotted a bug in BridgeMind that no model could solve in 6 months. Fable 5 failed. Fable 5.1 failed. Opus 5, Sol, Grok 4.6, all failed. Astra fixed it on the first prompt. Then it rebuilt my office in Blender from photos. Built a racing game in 13 minutes that took Fable 5.1 two hours. Cut OpenAI's hallucination rate nearly in half. All while using a third of the tokens. Full review is out now. I do not know how Anthropic survives this.

GPT 6 Astra one shotted a bug in BridgeMind that no model could solve in 6 months. Fable 5 failed. Fable 5.1 failed. Opus 5, Sol, Grok 4.6, all failed. Astra fixed it on the first prompt. Then it rebuilt my office in Blender from photos. Built a racing game in 13 minutes that took Fable 5.1 two hours. Cut OpenAI's hallucination rate nearly in half. All while using a third of the tokens. Full review is out now. I do not know how Anthropic survives this.

BridgeMind

37,762 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Kimi K3 just beat Fable 5 on the BridgeBench Horror House game test. I did not expect this at all. Kimi K3 is better than Fable 5 at game development and UI design. The two things Fable 5 was supposed to own. The 5x price increase suddenly makes sense.

Kimi K3 just beat Fable 5 on the BridgeBench Horror House game test. I did not expect this at all. Kimi K3 is better than Fable 5 at game development and UI design. The two things Fable 5 was supposed to own. The 5x price increase suddenly makes sense.

BridgeMind

149,482 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Super early preview of what I'm spending all of my Fable 5.1 tokens on. A GTA-style open-world multiplayer game, set in NYC. Fable will iron out some kinks over the next day or so, and then you all can play it! I'll keep the loop going so it keeps getting better.

Super early preview of what I'm spending all of my Fable 5.1 tokens on. A GTA-style open-world multiplayer game, set in NYC. Fable will iron out some kinks over the next day or so, and then you all can play it! I'll keep the loop going so it keeps getting better.

Matt Shumer

966,141 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

The new Fable 5.1 built three games and did it 7% cheaper! We gave the same prompts through Atomic Agent: ✦ Sticky ball that rolls up everything in its path ✦ Capybara surfing down a river, Subway Surfers style ✦ Dumpling running an endless conveyor dodge Outputs: ✦ Claude Fable 5, via Atomic Agent: $7.65 ✦ Claude Fable 5.1, via Atomic Agent: $7.08 Run it through an agent and that cache discount is where the money hides. The loop reads the file, watches it break, and pulls the whole context back in to fix it, over and over. Every one of those re-reads costs a quarter on 5.1 of what it cost on 5. Same games on screen, and the newer version just spends less to get there. Across three builds the loop paid for the upgrade on its own.

The new Fable 5.1 built three games and did it 7% cheaper! We gave the same prompts through Atomic Agent: ✦ Sticky ball that rolls up everything in its path ✦ Capybara surfing down a river, Subway Surfers style ✦ Dumpling running an endless conveyor dodge Outputs: ✦ Claude Fable 5, via Atomic Agent: $7.65 ✦ Claude Fable 5.1, via Atomic Agent: $7.08 Run it through an agent and that cache discount is where the money hides. The loop reads the file, watches it break, and pulls the whole context back in to fix it, over and over. Every one of those re-reads costs a quarter on 5.1 of what it cost on 5. Same games on screen, and the newer version just spends less to get there. Across three builds the loop paid for the upgrade on its own.

Atomic Agent

20,255 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

FABLE 5.1 IS WILD! This video is NOT a screen recording of It's what happened when we pasted a screenshot of X into Kilo Code with Fable 5.1 and said: "Recreate X (twitter). Use the screenshot for design, and implement all actual functionality." One prompt, $13.00. All buttons work, and all the X functionality is there: reposts, quotes, polls, settings, suggestions, etc. 🤯

FABLE 5.1 IS WILD! This video is NOT a screen recording of It's what happened when we pasted a screenshot of X into Kilo Code with Fable 5.1 and said: "Recreate X (twitter). Use the screenshot for design, and implement all actual functionality." One prompt, $13.00. All buttons work, and all the X functionality is there: reposts, quotes, polls, settings, suggestions, etc. 🤯

Kilo (acq. by Anaconda)

11,554 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen