正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Fable 5.1 + Opus 5

Evan

1,223 subscribers

2,001,296 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术科学技术游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

36 条评论

Boris Cherny 的头像

Boris Cherny1 个月前

Oh LOVE this vibe. Like superhot as a doodle

Evan 的头像

Evan1 个月前

It’s going live w/ multiplayer this weekend. If you want to hop on I’ll send you the link!

itchy 的头像

itchy1 个月前

holy fuck this is sick, can you share a repo?

Eddi 的头像

Eddi1 个月前

Honestly I think I like this better than any other AI shooter demo I have seen. I could see myself play this.

Paulius 🏴‍☠️ 的头像

Paulius 🏴‍☠️1 个月前

can we get this multiplayer

Evan 的头像

Evan1 个月前

Going to make this publicly available and add multiplayer this weekend. Stay tuned!

Evan 的头像

Evan1 个月前

Play the game here:

Joshhfm 的头像

Joshhfm1 个月前

Paper Strike I need the multiplayer

Lukitun.xyz 的头像

Lukitun.xyz1 个月前

wow such XII vibes

Adrian Phan 的头像

Adrian Phan1 个月前

looks like we finally completed the loop back to where we began with Nvidia GPU's powering the masterpiece Counter-Strike (CS) 1.5

Aaron Mathew Philip 的头像

Aaron Mathew Philip1 个月前

If you are saying the truth this is absolutely crazy

alexis 的头像

alexis1 个月前

hey bro here’s my fable 5.1 shooter slop that i will forget about in two weeks

Hassan 的头像

Hassan1 个月前

best ai shooter I seen so far

Divyanshu 的头像

Divyanshu1 个月前

damm never thought about shooter game in this theme

LancerEvoX 的头像

LancerEvoX1 个月前

Damn, I need the source code for taht

Sasikumar student 的头像

Sasikumar student1 个月前

Need GitHub repo link

Sooraj Narayan 的头像

Sooraj Narayan1 个月前

nice creativity

Ma Ga Re 的头像

Ma Ga Re1 个月前

Beautiful.

XΞNTINΔL 的头像

XΞNTINΔL1 个月前

Nice

Nuno Pereira 的头像

Nuno Pereira1 个月前

This is trully beautiful.

Ashish 的头像

Ashish1 个月前

That's amazing idea and concept for a fps game.

Rahul 的头像

Rahul1 个月前

Would make a good game for the browser

Bilal Bakr 的头像

Bilal Bakr1 个月前

Looks good, but man Astra can 100% one shot this in better ways

Mark Attar 的头像

Mark Attar1 个月前

Awesome job this has polish

murat 🍥 的头像

murat 🍥1 个月前

well done

Anurag 的头像

Anurag1 个月前

I liked it a lot :)

Armaan 的头像

Armaan1 个月前

add GPT-6 Astra and you'll have GTA 6

fkz 的头像

fkz1 个月前

Repo+prompt pls this is fantastic

zackbuilds 的头像

zackbuilds1 个月前

two model names and 290k views. people really want to see what these tools can do in a game now

G.M 的头像

G.M1 个月前

Cool

Entadion 🌼 的头像

Entadion 🌼1 个月前

This looks like a real jump in what models can do inside a game. What was harder here - understanding the scene or controlling the actions in real time?

Nebulizer 的头像

Nebulizer1 个月前

so this is where my compute went

路人甲的头像

路人甲1 个月前

I want a github link🤘👍

milksense – oss/acc 的头像

milksense – oss/acc1 个月前

that's insane 🫶

Linzec 的头像

Linzec1 个月前

太厉害了

Rogue Puddle 的头像

Rogue Puddle1 个月前

Woah this is sooo cool I can’t waiiit to play the next three.js slop

相关视频

I built my fire truck game again with fable 5.1 instead of opus 5. Same idea as It used two full weekly fable 5.1 rate limits, and it’s ok, a bit better then opus 5 but just not usable at all on a max 20 plan…

I built my fire truck game again with fable 5.1 instead of opus 5. Same idea as It used two full weekly fable 5.1 rate limits, and it’s ok, a bit better then opus 5 but just not usable at all on a max 20 plan…

Jake Verbaten

29,313 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Fable 5.1 vs Fable 5 - Spaceship interior demo! Fable 5.1 does much better on hallway detail, also the robustness of all the objects, theres less much less clipping - and a more coherent put together cockpit. However, I did like Fable 5’s kitchen choice over Fable 5.1

Chris

14,745 次观看 • 1 个月前

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Tim Jayas

840,774 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.1 vs. Fable 5 in shadow animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Fable 5.1 vs. Fable 5 in shadow animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

58,872 次观看 • 1 个月前

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Claude

29,447,826 次观看 • 1 个月前

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

K2S

242,890 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Bhavy☄️

32,985 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Opus 5.5 just ONE SHOT a Mario Kart game. The result is way better than Fable 5.1. The attention to detail is on another level. Opus 5.5 actually created real characters. Mario, Luigi, in the game, playable. Fable 5.1 has never done that. Insanely impressed. This model is different.

Claude Opus 5.5 just ONE SHOT a Mario Kart game. The result is way better than Fable 5.1. The attention to detail is on another level. Opus 5.5 actually created real characters. Mario, Luigi, in the game, playable. Fable 5.1 has never done that. Insanely impressed. This model is different.

BridgeMind

379,223 次观看 • 1 个月前

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Addy Osmani

419,644 次观看 • 1 个月前

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

304,002 次观看 • 3 个月前

$Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.$

Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.

Dan McAteer

156,614 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.1 everyone

Fable 5.1 everyone

m0dE

34,845 次观看 • 1 个月前

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

99,417 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Ahad Shams | AI Ads Guy

47,773 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Fable 5.1 launched

🚨 Fable 5.1 launched

Chetaslua

41,416 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.1 is incredible.

Fable 5.1 is incredible.

Theo - t3.gg

126,485 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Mario Kart game. This is one of the best results I've had so far and I am SUPER impressed with the game development capabilities. Fable 5.1 is a huge step up from Fable 5.

BridgeMind

1,310,052 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

BridgeMind

188,973 次观看 • 3 个月前

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

sui

263,336 次观看 • 3 个月前