Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

fable 5.2 > gpt 6 astra tested both models with same prompt at high reasoning and results came out really different fable next model entered stealth testing today, so i don’t think it's coming out anytime soon from early testing: > huge step up from current fable > output...

39,450 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

52 Comments

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

here's full comparison of all outputs against fable next model name is not confirmed so i assumed it's gonna be fable 5.2 but let's see

vengeful181's profile picture
vengeful1811 day ago

Adding glowy lights doesn't mean is better. Thats a very vibecoder point of view

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

it needs to look visually good so yeah

vengeful181's profile picture
vengeful1811 day ago

The bottom lights litteraly glow in square shape

Haleemah's profile picture
Haleemah1 day ago

Astra won’t like this

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

haha astra will have next model soon too

Robin Ebers's profile picture
Robin Ebers1 day ago

the fuck is fable 5.2 man hahahaha

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

try same prompt of tibo on fable 5.1 and if it knows you should have something either new checkpoint or new fable but not everyone have it and started earlier today

Robin Ebers's profile picture
Robin Ebers1 day ago

these mfers

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

they will give you few days after everyone enjoyed it lol

Veee's profile picture
Veee1 day ago

whne output from Opus 5.2? Lemme try it with Opus 5.2 Send me prompt G :)

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

i posted it days ago it's better not same as fable 5.2

Veee's profile picture
Veee1 day ago

hmm That's good then

Rand's profile picture
Rand1 day ago

id assume 5.2 to be a legit step up... damn man any thoughts when? I am getting bored of astra

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

so i did just a little testing cuz it's expensive opus 5.2> fable 5.2> astra 6 (pretty sure astra next model will out soon if fable 5.2 come out)

Tim Jayas's profile picture
Tim Jayas1 day ago

fable 5.2 mogs Astra

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

yeah but for now astra leads

Hybrid 🏃🏾's profile picture
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 day ago

Bro.. Fable is 5.2 looks GOOD

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

posting frontend test really soon

Hybrid 🏃🏾's profile picture
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 day ago

How are you getting these early access lol share the sauce

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

i posted it already how check if it answers you question tibo one in claude code or chat or co work then you have it

Chris W's profile picture
Chris W1 day ago

i can already see this in Fusion, this looks mad good

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

haha soon soon

Howaboua's profile picture
Howaboua1 day ago

Wonder what your prompt was hahahahahha I've been doing basically the same test for a while now. The real magic happened when I asked astra to actually create a landscape out of it.

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

yooo wtff i want prompt for this

kepo's profile picture
kepo1 day ago

one promt and y'all limits on gpt 6 astra just cooked so sad hahahaha btw, fable 5.2 looks interesting here

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

if anthropic release new fable openai will release new astra too

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack's profile picture
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 day ago

@notjazii interesting to see the different results! makes me think about how much the underlying architecture impacts outcomes.

Maneesh Reddy's profile picture
Maneesh Reddy1 day ago

Rest in peace to all those people who keep jumping from Claude to GPT just because their models are good once in a while. Right now there's no point in staying with ChatGPT because their usage limits are worse than Claude's and Claude can come back with a better model within a week or two of an OpenAI model release. At this point I would say just stick with Claude and go through ups and downs rather than going through ups and downs in both Claude and OpenAI

Ferus's profile picture
Ferus1 day ago

do you think they will come out this week?

J A Z I I's profile picture
J A Z I I1 day ago

opus 5 next model have good chances for today but fable nah at least 10 days i'd say

Ferus's profile picture
Ferus1 day ago

I hope for a reset, I need it, I have used up almost all my weekly credits in a day, I am working on a new gaming platform.

KC's profile picture
KC1 day ago

Woah fable mogged Astra

JK's profile picture
JK1 day ago

Quality step is welcome. Still doesn't help if normal users can't afford to run it daily.

avgrocketman's profile picture
avgrocketman1 day ago

This is Anthropic's response to GPT-6. They were waiting for them to release it and now they'll mog

lorilero's profile picture
lorilero1 day ago

Astra looks better for me

vengeful181's profile picture
vengeful1811 day ago

Also those glowly lights don't even look good, lol

Mohd Suhail Idrisi's profile picture
Mohd Suhail Idrisi1 day ago

One prompt at high reasoning is not enough to call it. If the seed and the reasoning budget were not pinned, most of that gap is sampling noise. Five runs each and compare the spread, not the best output.

Shubh's profile picture
Shubh1 day ago

Bro is cooking hard, staying tuned for more outputs :)

Gregor's profile picture
Gregor1 day ago

The 'high reasoning' setting isn't standardized across providers. When I ran cross-model comparisons, I found one model burning 3-4x the tokens to reach its answer. The quality gap looked real until I accounted for compute.

Shikhar's profile picture
Shikhar1 day ago

As always fable adds good default taste on its own, for astra you need to give it

Pampa's profile picture
Pampa1 day ago

btw Jazii wanted to ask, did you manage to qualify for new creator revenue?

randomcoder's profile picture
randomcoder1 day ago

Any leaks for Fable 7?

David Wood's profile picture
David Wood1 day ago

@grok does anyone have access to Fable 5.2 yet?

BLANK _'s profile picture
BLANK _1 day ago

glow up or glow down, speed matters more

Shara's profile picture
Shara1 day ago

Reasoning level needs stating in any model comparison.

Intentauri's profile picture
Intentauri1 day ago

So how is this better than Astra? Because of light? Look well into both, why should there entrance be packed together on fable, see how clean and practical Astra is

Vini's profile picture
Vini1 day ago

Same prompt on both, that is the fair way to compare.

Norberto Marques's profile picture
Norberto Marques1 day ago

I got the opposite result in my tests. Astra still works better for most of what I do, although Fable looks much better than before

James Malsawm's profile picture
James Malsawm1 day ago

Fable 5. 2 is the banger Model for me. Astra is good but it use tokens too much.

Pampa's profile picture
Pampa1 day ago

Like these vids. Astra absolutely insane

Tak 🦞's profile picture
Tak 🦞1 day ago

the lighting makes a massive difference

Related Videos

gpt astra vs fable 5.1 at goldberg machine gpt 6 astra – openai, landed on OpenRouter less then hour ago, provider pinned to openai fable 5.1 – anthropic, shipped sep 1 we put the two models on one job: a rube goldberg machine in three.js that presses a button and detonates a bomb the setup: one self-contained html file, three.js from a cdn, everything else procedural – no textures, no models, no physics engine, every collision hand-written. the hard part sits in the brief: a domino may only fall once the previous one actually touches it, checked by real overlap every frame, never by a timer. same rule for the hammer hitting the button and the button firing the bomb. one continuous camera, its speed driven by whatever is moving. we recorded both scenes frame by frame – 1200 frames, 60 fps, exactly 20 seconds – and stepped both by hand to read the telemetry. - cost #1 astra – $1.84 #2 fable – $29.16 - time #1 astra – 9m 56s #2 fable – 1h 12m - tokens #1 astra – 45k #2 fable – 360k - lines of code astra – 881 fable – 744 observations: • we told it what we saw and nothing else – no diagnosis, no patch. we never edit a model's code. round two ran the whole chain to the blast. • both files are deterministic. two runs each, identical state to twelve decimals, and neither model reached for math.random. conclusion: 15.8x cheaper and 7.2x faster, and it still took a second round to get the ball into the bucket! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

37,224 views • 15 days ago