Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

fable 5.2 > gpt 6 astra tested both models with same prompt at high reasoning and results came out really different fable next model entered stealth testing today, so i don’t think it's coming out anytime soon from early testing: > huge step up from current fable > output...

39,450 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 52

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

here's full comparison of all outputs against fable next model name is not confirmed so i assumed it's gonna be fable 5.2 but let's see

Фото профиля vengeful181
vengeful1811 день назад

Adding glowy lights doesn't mean is better. Thats a very vibecoder point of view

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

it needs to look visually good so yeah

Фото профиля vengeful181
vengeful1811 день назад

The bottom lights litteraly glow in square shape

Фото профиля Haleemah
Haleemah1 день назад

Astra won’t like this

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

haha astra will have next model soon too

Фото профиля Robin Ebers
Robin Ebers1 день назад

the fuck is fable 5.2 man hahahaha

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

try same prompt of tibo on fable 5.1 and if it knows you should have something either new checkpoint or new fable but not everyone have it and started earlier today

Фото профиля Robin Ebers
Robin Ebers1 день назад

these mfers

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

they will give you few days after everyone enjoyed it lol

Фото профиля Veee
Veee1 день назад

whne output from Opus 5.2? Lemme try it with Opus 5.2 Send me prompt G :)

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

i posted it days ago it's better not same as fable 5.2

Фото профиля Veee
Veee1 день назад

hmm That's good then

Фото профиля Rand
Rand1 день назад

id assume 5.2 to be a legit step up... damn man any thoughts when? I am getting bored of astra

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

so i did just a little testing cuz it's expensive opus 5.2> fable 5.2> astra 6 (pretty sure astra next model will out soon if fable 5.2 come out)

Фото профиля Tim Jayas
Tim Jayas1 день назад

fable 5.2 mogs Astra

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

yeah but for now astra leads

Фото профиля Hybrid 🏃🏾
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 день назад

Bro.. Fable is 5.2 looks GOOD

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

posting frontend test really soon

Фото профиля Hybrid 🏃🏾
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 день назад

How are you getting these early access lol share the sauce

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

i posted it already how check if it answers you question tibo one in claude code or chat or co work then you have it

Фото профиля Chris W
Chris W1 день назад

i can already see this in Fusion, this looks mad good

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

haha soon soon

Фото профиля Howaboua
Howaboua1 день назад

Wonder what your prompt was hahahahahha I've been doing basically the same test for a while now. The real magic happened when I asked astra to actually create a landscape out of it.

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

yooo wtff i want prompt for this

Фото профиля kepo
kepo1 день назад

one promt and y'all limits on gpt 6 astra just cooked so sad hahahaha btw, fable 5.2 looks interesting here

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

if anthropic release new fable openai will release new astra too

Фото профиля Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 день назад

@notjazii interesting to see the different results! makes me think about how much the underlying architecture impacts outcomes.

Фото профиля Maneesh Reddy
Maneesh Reddy1 день назад

Rest in peace to all those people who keep jumping from Claude to GPT just because their models are good once in a while. Right now there's no point in staying with ChatGPT because their usage limits are worse than Claude's and Claude can come back with a better model within a week or two of an OpenAI model release. At this point I would say just stick with Claude and go through ups and downs rather than going through ups and downs in both Claude and OpenAI

Фото профиля Ferus
Ferus1 день назад

do you think they will come out this week?

Фото профиля J A Z I I
J A Z I I1 день назад

opus 5 next model have good chances for today but fable nah at least 10 days i'd say

Фото профиля Ferus
Ferus1 день назад

I hope for a reset, I need it, I have used up almost all my weekly credits in a day, I am working on a new gaming platform.

Фото профиля KC
KC1 день назад

Woah fable mogged Astra

Фото профиля JK
JK1 день назад

Quality step is welcome. Still doesn't help if normal users can't afford to run it daily.

Фото профиля avgrocketman
avgrocketman1 день назад

This is Anthropic's response to GPT-6. They were waiting for them to release it and now they'll mog

Фото профиля lorilero
lorilero1 день назад

Astra looks better for me

Фото профиля vengeful181
vengeful1811 день назад

Also those glowly lights don't even look good, lol

Фото профиля Mohd Suhail Idrisi
Mohd Suhail Idrisi1 день назад

One prompt at high reasoning is not enough to call it. If the seed and the reasoning budget were not pinned, most of that gap is sampling noise. Five runs each and compare the spread, not the best output.

Фото профиля Shubh
Shubh1 день назад

Bro is cooking hard, staying tuned for more outputs :)

Фото профиля Gregor
Gregor1 день назад

The 'high reasoning' setting isn't standardized across providers. When I ran cross-model comparisons, I found one model burning 3-4x the tokens to reach its answer. The quality gap looked real until I accounted for compute.

Фото профиля Shikhar
Shikhar1 день назад

As always fable adds good default taste on its own, for astra you need to give it

Фото профиля Pampa
Pampa1 день назад

btw Jazii wanted to ask, did you manage to qualify for new creator revenue?

Фото профиля randomcoder
randomcoder1 день назад

Any leaks for Fable 7?

Фото профиля David Wood
David Wood1 день назад

@grok does anyone have access to Fable 5.2 yet?

Фото профиля BLANK _
BLANK _1 день назад

glow up or glow down, speed matters more

Фото профиля Shara
Shara1 день назад

Reasoning level needs stating in any model comparison.

Фото профиля Intentauri
Intentauri1 день назад

So how is this better than Astra? Because of light? Look well into both, why should there entrance be packed together on fable, see how clean and practical Astra is

Фото профиля Vini
Vini1 день назад

Same prompt on both, that is the fair way to compare.

Фото профиля Norberto Marques
Norberto Marques1 день назад

I got the opposite result in my tests. Astra still works better for most of what I do, although Fable looks much better than before

Фото профиля James Malsawm
James Malsawm1 день назад

Fable 5. 2 is the banger Model for me. Astra is good but it use tokens too much.

Фото профиля Pampa
Pampa1 день назад

Like these vids. Astra absolutely insane

Фото профиля Tak 🦞
Tak 🦞1 день назад

the lighting makes a massive difference

Похожие видео

gpt astra vs fable 5.1 at goldberg machine gpt 6 astra – openai, landed on OpenRouter less then hour ago, provider pinned to openai fable 5.1 – anthropic, shipped sep 1 we put the two models on one job: a rube goldberg machine in three.js that presses a button and detonates a bomb the setup: one self-contained html file, three.js from a cdn, everything else procedural – no textures, no models, no physics engine, every collision hand-written. the hard part sits in the brief: a domino may only fall once the previous one actually touches it, checked by real overlap every frame, never by a timer. same rule for the hammer hitting the button and the button firing the bomb. one continuous camera, its speed driven by whatever is moving. we recorded both scenes frame by frame – 1200 frames, 60 fps, exactly 20 seconds – and stepped both by hand to read the telemetry. - cost #1 astra – $1.84 #2 fable – $29.16 - time #1 astra – 9m 56s #2 fable – 1h 12m - tokens #1 astra – 45k #2 fable – 360k - lines of code astra – 881 fable – 744 observations: • we told it what we saw and nothing else – no diagnosis, no patch. we never edit a model's code. round two ran the whole chain to the blast. • both files are deterministic. two runs each, identical state to twelve decimals, and neither model reached for math.random. conclusion: 15.8x cheaper and 7.2x faster, and it still took a second round to get the ball into the bucket! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

37,224 просмотров • 15 дней назад