正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

fable 5.2 > gpt 6 astra tested both models with same prompt at high reasoning and results came out really different fable next model entered stealth testing today, so i don’t think it's coming out anytime soon from early testing: > huge step up from current fable > output...

39,450 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

52 条评论

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

here's full comparison of all outputs against fable next model name is not confirmed so i assumed it's gonna be fable 5.2 but let's see

vengeful181 的头像
vengeful1811 天前

Adding glowy lights doesn't mean is better. Thats a very vibecoder point of view

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

it needs to look visually good so yeah

vengeful181 的头像
vengeful1811 天前

The bottom lights litteraly glow in square shape

Haleemah 的头像
Haleemah1 天前

Astra won’t like this

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

haha astra will have next model soon too

Robin Ebers 的头像
Robin Ebers1 天前

the fuck is fable 5.2 man hahahaha

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

try same prompt of tibo on fable 5.1 and if it knows you should have something either new checkpoint or new fable but not everyone have it and started earlier today

Robin Ebers 的头像
Robin Ebers1 天前

these mfers

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

they will give you few days after everyone enjoyed it lol

Veee 的头像
Veee1 天前

whne output from Opus 5.2? Lemme try it with Opus 5.2 Send me prompt G :)

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

i posted it days ago it's better not same as fable 5.2

Veee 的头像
Veee1 天前

hmm That's good then

Rand 的头像
Rand1 天前

id assume 5.2 to be a legit step up... damn man any thoughts when? I am getting bored of astra

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

so i did just a little testing cuz it's expensive opus 5.2> fable 5.2> astra 6 (pretty sure astra next model will out soon if fable 5.2 come out)

Tim Jayas 的头像
Tim Jayas1 天前

fable 5.2 mogs Astra

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

yeah but for now astra leads

Hybrid 🏃🏾 的头像
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 天前

Bro.. Fable is 5.2 looks GOOD

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

posting frontend test really soon

Hybrid 🏃🏾 的头像
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 天前

How are you getting these early access lol share the sauce

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

i posted it already how check if it answers you question tibo one in claude code or chat or co work then you have it

Chris W 的头像
Chris W1 天前

i can already see this in Fusion, this looks mad good

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

haha soon soon

Howaboua 的头像
Howaboua1 天前

Wonder what your prompt was hahahahahha I've been doing basically the same test for a while now. The real magic happened when I asked astra to actually create a landscape out of it.

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

yooo wtff i want prompt for this

kepo 的头像
kepo1 天前

one promt and y'all limits on gpt 6 astra just cooked so sad hahahaha btw, fable 5.2 looks interesting here

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

if anthropic release new fable openai will release new astra too

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack 的头像
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 天前

@notjazii interesting to see the different results! makes me think about how much the underlying architecture impacts outcomes.

Maneesh Reddy 的头像
Maneesh Reddy1 天前

Rest in peace to all those people who keep jumping from Claude to GPT just because their models are good once in a while. Right now there's no point in staying with ChatGPT because their usage limits are worse than Claude's and Claude can come back with a better model within a week or two of an OpenAI model release. At this point I would say just stick with Claude and go through ups and downs rather than going through ups and downs in both Claude and OpenAI

Ferus 的头像
Ferus1 天前

do you think they will come out this week?

J A Z I I 的头像
J A Z I I1 天前

opus 5 next model have good chances for today but fable nah at least 10 days i'd say

Ferus 的头像
Ferus1 天前

I hope for a reset, I need it, I have used up almost all my weekly credits in a day, I am working on a new gaming platform.

KC 的头像
KC1 天前

Woah fable mogged Astra

JK 的头像
JK1 天前

Quality step is welcome. Still doesn't help if normal users can't afford to run it daily.

avgrocketman 的头像
avgrocketman1 天前

This is Anthropic's response to GPT-6. They were waiting for them to release it and now they'll mog

lorilero 的头像
lorilero1 天前

Astra looks better for me

vengeful181 的头像
vengeful1811 天前

Also those glowly lights don't even look good, lol

Mohd Suhail Idrisi 的头像
Mohd Suhail Idrisi1 天前

One prompt at high reasoning is not enough to call it. If the seed and the reasoning budget were not pinned, most of that gap is sampling noise. Five runs each and compare the spread, not the best output.

Shubh 的头像
Shubh1 天前

Bro is cooking hard, staying tuned for more outputs :)

Gregor 的头像
Gregor1 天前

The 'high reasoning' setting isn't standardized across providers. When I ran cross-model comparisons, I found one model burning 3-4x the tokens to reach its answer. The quality gap looked real until I accounted for compute.

Shikhar 的头像
Shikhar1 天前

As always fable adds good default taste on its own, for astra you need to give it

Pampa 的头像
Pampa1 天前

btw Jazii wanted to ask, did you manage to qualify for new creator revenue?

randomcoder 的头像
randomcoder1 天前

Any leaks for Fable 7?

David Wood 的头像
David Wood1 天前

@grok does anyone have access to Fable 5.2 yet?

BLANK _ 的头像
BLANK _1 天前

glow up or glow down, speed matters more

Shara 的头像
Shara1 天前

Reasoning level needs stating in any model comparison.

Intentauri 的头像
Intentauri1 天前

So how is this better than Astra? Because of light? Look well into both, why should there entrance be packed together on fable, see how clean and practical Astra is

Vini 的头像
Vini1 天前

Same prompt on both, that is the fair way to compare.

Norberto Marques 的头像
Norberto Marques1 天前

I got the opposite result in my tests. Astra still works better for most of what I do, although Fable looks much better than before

James Malsawm 的头像
James Malsawm1 天前

Fable 5. 2 is the banger Model for me. Astra is good but it use tokens too much.

Pampa 的头像
Pampa1 天前

Like these vids. Astra absolutely insane

Tak 🦞 的头像
Tak 🦞1 天前

the lighting makes a massive difference

相关视频

gpt astra vs fable 5.1 at goldberg machine gpt 6 astra – openai, landed on OpenRouter less then hour ago, provider pinned to openai fable 5.1 – anthropic, shipped sep 1 we put the two models on one job: a rube goldberg machine in three.js that presses a button and detonates a bomb the setup: one self-contained html file, three.js from a cdn, everything else procedural – no textures, no models, no physics engine, every collision hand-written. the hard part sits in the brief: a domino may only fall once the previous one actually touches it, checked by real overlap every frame, never by a timer. same rule for the hammer hitting the button and the button firing the bomb. one continuous camera, its speed driven by whatever is moving. we recorded both scenes frame by frame – 1200 frames, 60 fps, exactly 20 seconds – and stepped both by hand to read the telemetry. - cost #1 astra – $1.84 #2 fable – $29.16 - time #1 astra – 9m 56s #2 fable – 1h 12m - tokens #1 astra – 45k #2 fable – 360k - lines of code astra – 881 fable – 744 observations: • we told it what we saw and nothing else – no diagnosis, no patch. we never edit a model's code. round two ran the whole chain to the blast. • both files are deterministic. two runs each, identical state to twelve decimals, and neither model reached for math.random. conclusion: 15.8x cheaper and 7.2x faster, and it still took a second round to get the ball into the bucket! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

37,224 次观看 • 15 天前