Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Fact check: 100% true. When the Smithsonian opened the African American History Museum in 2016, the Museum’s leadership not only did not mention Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, they had three glowing references to Anita Hill, his discredited accuser whom the American people did not believe told the truth...

MarkPaoletta's profile picture

Mark Paoletta

43,966 subscribers

190,371 views • 27 days ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 JUST IN OVERNIGHT: President Trump CONFIRMS that conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not retiring this term “He is one of the Greatest of All Time. We are all lucky!” 🇺🇸 “Great news for our Country! Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has announced that he is staying for another Term.” He’s up there with Clarence Thomas! Alito has plenty of time to decide on retirement, with Trump in the WH and Republicans likely controlling the Senate through Jan 2029
0:15

🚨 JUST IN OVERNIGHT: President Trump CONFIRMS that conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not retiring this term “He is one of the Greatest of All Time. We are all lucky!” 🇺🇸 “Great news for our Country! Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has announced that he is staying for another Term.” He’s up there with Clarence Thomas! Alito has plenty of time to decide on retirement, with Trump in the WH and Republicans likely controlling the Senate through Jan 2029

Eric Daugherty

45,475 views • 13 days ago

Dr. Anthony Fauci is still getting the hero treatment at the Smithsonian. The face of America's COVID-19 response is prominently featured inside the National Museum of American History, where an exhibit highlights the ceremonial first pitch he threw at a Washington Nationals game in 2020. The display calls Fauci the nation's leading epidemiologist and says he urged sports leagues to base reopening decisions on "scientific evidence and public health judgment" before noting he threw the opening pitch when baseball returned in an empty stadium. The exhibit remains on display as the Smithsonian faces growing scrutiny over its messaging and exhibits.
0:15

Dr. Anthony Fauci is still getting the hero treatment at the Smithsonian. The face of America's COVID-19 response is prominently featured inside the National Museum of American History, where an exhibit highlights the ceremonial first pitch he threw at a Washington Nationals game in 2020. The display calls Fauci the nation's leading epidemiologist and says he urged sports leagues to base reopening decisions on "scientific evidence and public health judgment" before noting he threw the opening pitch when baseball returned in an empty stadium. The exhibit remains on display as the Smithsonian faces growing scrutiny over its messaging and exhibits.

Fox News

252,388 views • 25 days ago

In the early days of the UFC, when few people believed the sport had a future, Dana White struggled to find partners willing to take a chance on it. One prominent businessman not only opened his doors for UFC events, but showed up and publicly backed the organization when doing so offered little upside and plenty of criticism. Fifteen years later, that same businessman asked White to speak at the 2016 Republican National Convention. The rest is American History 🇺🇸
0:18

In the early days of the UFC, when few people believed the sport had a future, Dana White struggled to find partners willing to take a chance on it. One prominent businessman not only opened his doors for UFC events, but showed up and publicly backed the organization when doing so offered little upside and plenty of criticism. Fifteen years later, that same businessman asked White to speak at the 2016 Republican National Convention. The rest is American History 🇺🇸

BellaliberTea

50,197 views • 2 months ago

MC should’ve be careful when announcing names of the winner. This kind of mistake is dumb and its pretty disrespectful for both of the actors. How did you not even tell him it was NOT his award that he had to check it and give the trophy himself to the other actor? #이준영
0:16

MC should’ve be careful when announcing names of the winner. This kind of mistake is dumb and its pretty disrespectful for both of the actors. How did you not even tell him it was NOT his award that he had to check it and give the trophy himself to the other actor? #이준영

쌤..

893,721 views • 1 year ago

💩 SOMEBODY EXPLAIN JOHN ROBERTS TO US. BECAUSE WE CANNOT FIGURE HIM OUT! George W. Bush nominated John Roberts to the Supreme Court in 2005. He was confirmed 78 to 22. Republicans were thrilled. Conservatives had high hopes. He was supposed to be one of us. That was twenty one years ago. Let us look at what we got. Roberts was the deciding vote that saved Obamacare. Twice. In 2012 he rewrote the individual mandate as a tax to make it constitutional when it clearly was not. In 2015 he twisted the plain language of the statute to save it again when the text of the law was clearly on our side. The left was as shocked as we were that he saved it. And then he did it again. He sided with the liberals to strike down Louisiana's abortion clinic regulations in 2020, regulations nearly identical to ones he had previously voted to uphold. He joined the liberals to protect DACA, shielding Obama's unconstitutional amnesty program from being unwound by a Republican president. Today he joined Barrett and the three liberal justices to rule that mail in ballots do not need to be received by Election Day. On an election integrity case, with a Republican president in the White House fighting for the outcome, Roberts went the other way. This is not a one time thing. This is not a coincidence. This is a pattern spanning two decades. Roberts has voted with the liberal bloc on healthcare, immigration, abortion, and now election integrity. The cases that matter most to this movement are the cases where Roberts most often finds a reason to walk across the aisle. His defenders say he is protecting the institutional integrity of the Court. That he is playing a long game. That he is keeping the Court from appearing too political. Here is the problem with that argument. The left does not worry about appearing too political. They never have. They fight for every inch and they do not apologize for it. While Roberts is busy protecting the reputation of an institution, the institution keeps handing defeats to the people who believed in it. We are not asking for a rubber stamp. We are asking for a justice who applies the Constitution as written without one eye permanently fixed on what the New York Times editorial board is going to say the next morning. Alito does that. Thomas does that. Gorsuch does that. Roberts has given us twenty one years of carefully crafted, institutionally minded, reputation protecting decisions that keep landing on the wrong side of the most important fights of our time. George W. Bush picked him. Make of that what you will.
0:19

💩 SOMEBODY EXPLAIN JOHN ROBERTS TO US. BECAUSE WE CANNOT FIGURE HIM OUT! George W. Bush nominated John Roberts to the Supreme Court in 2005. He was confirmed 78 to 22. Republicans were thrilled. Conservatives had high hopes. He was supposed to be one of us. That was twenty one years ago. Let us look at what we got. Roberts was the deciding vote that saved Obamacare. Twice. In 2012 he rewrote the individual mandate as a tax to make it constitutional when it clearly was not. In 2015 he twisted the plain language of the statute to save it again when the text of the law was clearly on our side. The left was as shocked as we were that he saved it. And then he did it again. He sided with the liberals to strike down Louisiana's abortion clinic regulations in 2020, regulations nearly identical to ones he had previously voted to uphold. He joined the liberals to protect DACA, shielding Obama's unconstitutional amnesty program from being unwound by a Republican president. Today he joined Barrett and the three liberal justices to rule that mail in ballots do not need to be received by Election Day. On an election integrity case, with a Republican president in the White House fighting for the outcome, Roberts went the other way. This is not a one time thing. This is not a coincidence. This is a pattern spanning two decades. Roberts has voted with the liberal bloc on healthcare, immigration, abortion, and now election integrity. The cases that matter most to this movement are the cases where Roberts most often finds a reason to walk across the aisle. His defenders say he is protecting the institutional integrity of the Court. That he is playing a long game. That he is keeping the Court from appearing too political. Here is the problem with that argument. The left does not worry about appearing too political. They never have. They fight for every inch and they do not apologize for it. While Roberts is busy protecting the reputation of an institution, the institution keeps handing defeats to the people who believed in it. We are not asking for a rubber stamp. We are asking for a justice who applies the Constitution as written without one eye permanently fixed on what the New York Times editorial board is going to say the next morning. Alito does that. Thomas does that. Gorsuch does that. Roberts has given us twenty one years of carefully crafted, institutionally minded, reputation protecting decisions that keep landing on the wrong side of the most important fights of our time. George W. Bush picked him. Make of that what you will.

Bill Mitchell

108,505 views • 1 month ago

🚨President Trump just exposed BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP is now being SOLD along our southern border! Thanks SCOTUS! Signs are openly advertising “birthright citizenship deliveries starting at $4,000,” turning American citizenship into a for sale product for anyone willing to pay. This is unsustainable. It’s a direct threat to our sovereignty, and the entire family will follow once they game the system. Trump is calling is demanding the Supreme Court fix this insanity immediately. American citizenship is not for sale. Period. We must secure our country before it’s too late. 🇺🇸 ────────────────────────────── "Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP"
0:10

🚨President Trump just exposed BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP is now being SOLD along our southern border! Thanks SCOTUS! Signs are openly advertising “birthright citizenship deliveries starting at $4,000,” turning American citizenship into a for sale product for anyone willing to pay. This is unsustainable. It’s a direct threat to our sovereignty, and the entire family will follow once they game the system. Trump is calling is demanding the Supreme Court fix this insanity immediately. American citizenship is not for sale. Period. We must secure our country before it’s too late. 🇺🇸 ────────────────────────────── "Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social

197,015 views • 1 month ago

On June 1st, Romeo was arriving at work when he was wrongfully taken by ICE. They did not ask his name, did not provide any documentation, and would not give information as to why he was being arrested. According to one of the ICE workers, after the fact, he was not who they were looking for, and despite his having no criminal history, he is still being detained somewhere. The GoFundMe is to help his family be able to afford a lawyer so that he can get the legal help that he deserves and needs. 👉
0:17

On June 1st, Romeo was arriving at work when he was wrongfully taken by ICE. They did not ask his name, did not provide any documentation, and would not give information as to why he was being arrested. According to one of the ICE workers, after the fact, he was not who they were looking for, and despite his having no criminal history, he is still being detained somewhere. The GoFundMe is to help his family be able to afford a lawyer so that he can get the legal help that he deserves and needs. 👉

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

95,749 views • 1 year ago

Wow. AOC just spilled the beans on the Deep State’s entire plan. This was never about justice. It was always about keeping Trump bogged down with an endless stream of phony cases, so he cannot campaign and to smear him in the media. It’s coordinated election interference. All of this is one giant plot, spearheaded by the Biden White House, to manipulate the American People, and prevent Trump from reclaiming office. This is not “democracy”. This is fascism.
0:17

Wow. AOC just spilled the beans on the Deep State’s entire plan. This was never about justice. It was always about keeping Trump bogged down with an endless stream of phony cases, so he cannot campaign and to smear him in the media. It’s coordinated election interference. All of this is one giant plot, spearheaded by the Biden White House, to manipulate the American People, and prevent Trump from reclaiming office. This is not “democracy”. This is fascism.

Clandestine

373,532 views • 2 years ago

🇻🇪🇺🇸 BREAKING: Maduro arriving in New York. Pre-trial set to take place. Tons of protesters. Both for and against. The empire kidnapped a president. Smuggled him out of Venezuela. Now puts him on trial in a foreign court. This is not justice. This is conquest dressed in robes. Venezuela did not bow. So Washington sent its lawyers. Its media. Its judges. The same playbook. Iraq. Libya. Venezuela. The empire cannot accept a nation that refuses to kneel. But the world is watching. The Global South is rising. Maduro is not alone. And this trial is not justice. It is a show. The curtain will fall. The empire will not win.
0:19

🇻🇪🇺🇸 BREAKING: Maduro arriving in New York. Pre-trial set to take place. Tons of protesters. Both for and against. The empire kidnapped a president. Smuggled him out of Venezuela. Now puts him on trial in a foreign court. This is not justice. This is conquest dressed in robes. Venezuela did not bow. So Washington sent its lawyers. Its media. Its judges. The same playbook. Iraq. Libya. Venezuela. The empire cannot accept a nation that refuses to kneel. But the world is watching. The Global South is rising. Maduro is not alone. And this trial is not justice. It is a show. The curtain will fall. The empire will not win.

New Direction AFRICA

28,011 views • 5 months ago

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.
0:19

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.

Bill Mitchell

248,916 views • 1 month ago

JD Vance just blatantly lied to the people of Michigan. He claimed that when Trump put tariffs on China, it caused prices to come down for the American people. This is a lie. When Trump put the tariffs on China, China retaliated by doing the same to American goods. The prices of goods did not generally come down for Americans. In fact, the opposite happened in many cases. Tariffs are essentially a tax on imported goods, and when these tariffs were applied to Chinese products, the increased costs were often passed on to American consumers in the form of higher prices. Additionally Trump's tariffs on China had significant negative impacts on American farmers. China's retaliation led to a sharp decline in demand for American farm products from Chinese buyers, which in turn caused a drop in prices and substantial financial losses for American farmers. Trump then gave subsidies to the Farmers in order to try and fix the mess he created.
0:14

JD Vance just blatantly lied to the people of Michigan. He claimed that when Trump put tariffs on China, it caused prices to come down for the American people. This is a lie. When Trump put the tariffs on China, China retaliated by doing the same to American goods. The prices of goods did not generally come down for Americans. In fact, the opposite happened in many cases. Tariffs are essentially a tax on imported goods, and when these tariffs were applied to Chinese products, the increased costs were often passed on to American consumers in the form of higher prices. Additionally Trump's tariffs on China had significant negative impacts on American farmers. China's retaliation led to a sharp decline in demand for American farm products from Chinese buyers, which in turn caused a drop in prices and substantial financial losses for American farmers. Trump then gave subsidies to the Farmers in order to try and fix the mess he created.

Ed Krassenstein

671,156 views • 2 years ago

We, the people of Iran, trusted the President of the United States, and in return, he betrayed us. He betrayed us the people whose 40,000 loved ones never came home. He exploited the blood of our innocent children to advance his own political goals. His legacy will be more shameful than that of any American president in history. But the truth is that the price of this betrayal will not be paid by Iranians alone. The entire world, including the American people, will bear the consequences. We will continue our struggle with or without America’s false promises and empty support. Shame on you, President Trump. President Donald J. Trump Secretary Marco Rubio Lindsey Graham Mark R. Levin
0:13

We, the people of Iran, trusted the President of the United States, and in return, he betrayed us. He betrayed us the people whose 40,000 loved ones never came home. He exploited the blood of our innocent children to advance his own political goals. His legacy will be more shameful than that of any American president in history. But the truth is that the price of this betrayal will not be paid by Iranians alone. The entire world, including the American people, will bear the consequences. We will continue our struggle with or without America’s false promises and empty support. Shame on you, President Trump. President Donald J. Trump Secretary Marco Rubio Lindsey Graham Mark R. Levin

Hesam Orouji

484,360 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE BIG QUESTION: SHOULD TRUMP FINALLY HIT IRAN'S INFRASTRUCTURE? History does not repeat, but it rhymes loud enough to hear. In 1945, Japan was finished. Its navy was gone. Its cities were burning. Its war machine could not replace what it lost. And still the leadership would not surrender. Iran today looks eerily familiar. Its radar sites keep getting flattened. Its small boats keep getting sunk. Its missile stockpiles keep getting hit. And still Tehran keeps shooting, mining, and lying its way through every ceasefire it signs. To be clear, nobody is talking about the weapon that finally ended Japan's war. Trump is not dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran, and nobody serious is suggesting he would. That is not the parallel. The parallel is the dilemma itself. What do you do with an enemy that is beaten by every rational measure, yet refuses to act like it? Trump has tried to solve that puzzle the hard way, the careful way. Hit the drone depots. Hit the coastal radar. Leave the power plants standing. Leave the water desalination facilities alone. Spare the bridges and highways ordinary families use every day. He said it himself. He does not want to punish a population for the sins of a regime they never chose, and he does not want American taxpayers footing the bill to rebuild a country we did not break in the first place. But restraint only works on an enemy capable of reading the signal. Iran keeps proving it cannot, or will not. So the real question is not whether Iran is beaten. It clearly is. The real question is what finally convinces a regime that will not admit defeat, without turning millions of ordinary Iranians into collateral damage for their leaders' stubbornness. That is the needle Trump has to thread. Escalate enough to end this, without becoming the very thing his restraint was designed to avoid. The world will be watching which targets he chooses next as closely as it watches whether Iran ever really surrenders at all.
0:19

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE BIG QUESTION: SHOULD TRUMP FINALLY HIT IRAN'S INFRASTRUCTURE? History does not repeat, but it rhymes loud enough to hear. In 1945, Japan was finished. Its navy was gone. Its cities were burning. Its war machine could not replace what it lost. And still the leadership would not surrender. Iran today looks eerily familiar. Its radar sites keep getting flattened. Its small boats keep getting sunk. Its missile stockpiles keep getting hit. And still Tehran keeps shooting, mining, and lying its way through every ceasefire it signs. To be clear, nobody is talking about the weapon that finally ended Japan's war. Trump is not dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran, and nobody serious is suggesting he would. That is not the parallel. The parallel is the dilemma itself. What do you do with an enemy that is beaten by every rational measure, yet refuses to act like it? Trump has tried to solve that puzzle the hard way, the careful way. Hit the drone depots. Hit the coastal radar. Leave the power plants standing. Leave the water desalination facilities alone. Spare the bridges and highways ordinary families use every day. He said it himself. He does not want to punish a population for the sins of a regime they never chose, and he does not want American taxpayers footing the bill to rebuild a country we did not break in the first place. But restraint only works on an enemy capable of reading the signal. Iran keeps proving it cannot, or will not. So the real question is not whether Iran is beaten. It clearly is. The real question is what finally convinces a regime that will not admit defeat, without turning millions of ordinary Iranians into collateral damage for their leaders' stubbornness. That is the needle Trump has to thread. Escalate enough to end this, without becoming the very thing his restraint was designed to avoid. The world will be watching which targets he chooses next as closely as it watches whether Iran ever really surrenders at all.

Bill Mitchell

33,676 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard SPEAKS OUT after the resignation of NCTC Director Joe Kent in protest of the Iran war Gabbard says President Trump CAREFULLY reviewed all intelligence in front of him and concluded Iran posed an "imminent threat" "Donald Trump was overwhelmingly elected by the American people to be our President and Commander in Chief. As our Commander in Chief, he is responsible for determining what is and is not an imminent threat, and whether or not to take action he deems necessary to protect the safety and security of our troops, the American people and our country. " "The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is responsible for helping coordinate and integrate all intelligence to provide the President and Commander in Chief with the best information available to inform his decisions." "After carefully reviewing all the information before him, President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion." 🇺🇸
0:16

🚨 BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard SPEAKS OUT after the resignation of NCTC Director Joe Kent in protest of the Iran war Gabbard says President Trump CAREFULLY reviewed all intelligence in front of him and concluded Iran posed an "imminent threat" "Donald Trump was overwhelmingly elected by the American people to be our President and Commander in Chief. As our Commander in Chief, he is responsible for determining what is and is not an imminent threat, and whether or not to take action he deems necessary to protect the safety and security of our troops, the American people and our country. " "The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is responsible for helping coordinate and integrate all intelligence to provide the President and Commander in Chief with the best information available to inform his decisions." "After carefully reviewing all the information before him, President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion." 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

80,887 views • 5 months ago

🚨#BREAKING: President Donald Trump has personally confirmed the death of Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei In a post, Donald Trump says that Khamenei is one of the most evil people in History now that he is dead. This is not only Justice for the people of Iran, but for all Great Americans, and those people from many Countries throughout the World, who have been killed or mutilated by Khamenei and his gang of bloodthirsty thugs.
0:12

🚨#BREAKING: President Donald Trump has personally confirmed the death of Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei In a post, Donald Trump says that Khamenei is one of the most evil people in History now that he is dead. This is not only Justice for the people of Iran, but for all Great Americans, and those people from many Countries throughout the World, who have been killed or mutilated by Khamenei and his gang of bloodthirsty thugs.

R A W S A L E R T S

271,844 views • 5 months ago

Sleepy Joe Biden was the WORST President in the history of our Country, by far! Millions of Americans saw it with their own eyes every single day. Even a 5 year old could tell he was totally INCOMPETENT and had absolutely no business being anywhere near the White House. Our Country was collapsing, horrible inflation, open borders chaos, weakness all over the world, and nonstop confusion. The Fake News media spent years covering for him, gaslighting the American people, and pretending it was all normal while the entire world watched the disaster in real time. The 2020 Election was RIGGED and STOLEN, everybody knows it! No amount of censorship, propaganda, or political intimidation will ever erase what the American people witnessed. Treasonous people weaponized the government and launched the greatest Witch Hunt in history against President Trump because they were terrified of the America First movement. Accountability is coming, and it is only a matter of time before these people are held accountable for what they did to our Country. MAGA! 🇺🇸
0:19

Sleepy Joe Biden was the WORST President in the history of our Country, by far! Millions of Americans saw it with their own eyes every single day. Even a 5 year old could tell he was totally INCOMPETENT and had absolutely no business being anywhere near the White House. Our Country was collapsing, horrible inflation, open borders chaos, weakness all over the world, and nonstop confusion. The Fake News media spent years covering for him, gaslighting the American people, and pretending it was all normal while the entire world watched the disaster in real time. The 2020 Election was RIGGED and STOLEN, everybody knows it! No amount of censorship, propaganda, or political intimidation will ever erase what the American people witnessed. Treasonous people weaponized the government and launched the greatest Witch Hunt in history against President Trump because they were terrified of the America First movement. Accountability is coming, and it is only a matter of time before these people are held accountable for what they did to our Country. MAGA! 🇺🇸

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

25,103 views • 3 months ago