正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE BIG QUESTION: SHOULD TRUMP FINALLY HIT IRAN'S INFRASTRUCTURE? History does not repeat, but it rhymes loud enough to hear. In 1945, Japan was finished. Its navy was gone. Its cities were burning. Its war machine could not replace what it lost. And still the leadership would...

mitchellvii's profile picture

Bill Mitchell

504,261 subscribers

33,676 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump: "The hard hit on Iran is yet to come. Hopefully, we won't have to use it." I don't know which parallel universe Trump is living in—or what he's been smoking.😂 The U.S. military has already thrown everything it had at Iran. Yet it couldn't reopen the Strait of Hormuz, nor could it protect its air bases and other military installations. And despite all that, Trump is still living under the illusion that the biggest strike is yet to come. 🤡
0:11

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump: "The hard hit on Iran is yet to come. Hopefully, we won't have to use it." I don't know which parallel universe Trump is living in—or what he's been smoking.😂 The U.S. military has already thrown everything it had at Iran. Yet it couldn't reopen the Strait of Hormuz, nor could it protect its air bases and other military installations. And despite all that, Trump is still living under the illusion that the biggest strike is yet to come. 🤡

Robert Bruce

14,711 次观看 • 8 天前

Vladimir Putin is placing the blame for the war squarely on Israel, accusing it of provoking the conflict with Iran. He insists it was Israel—not Iran—that started the war, and predicts that Israel will ultimately fail to achieve its objectives. "They won't reach their goals."
0:11

Vladimir Putin is placing the blame for the war squarely on Israel, accusing it of provoking the conflict with Iran. He insists it was Israel—not Iran—that started the war, and predicts that Israel will ultimately fail to achieve its objectives. "They won't reach their goals."

Shadow of Ezra

167,349 次观看 • 1 年前

China has flatly rejected Reuters’ claim that it planned to supply Iran with 400 surface-to-air missiles. Beijing barely concealed its impatience—because it knows that what Washington needs is not the truth, but an excuse. The United States has been fighting Iran for more than five months without achieving the clean victory it expected. It has not broken Iran on the battlefield. It has not won the information war. It has not restored the illusion of effortless American supremacy. So now it needs a hidden mastermind. Washington cannot admit that a country it sanctioned, isolated, and impoverished for decades still refuses to collapse. The preferred explanation must therefore be: America is not failing against Iran. China is secretly controlling the war. Hence the convenient fantasy of 400 Chinese missiles. China is the perfect villain because blaming China preserves every other myth: American weapons remain invincible. American sanctions remain omnipotent. American strategy remains flawless. Only an unseen Chinese hand could possibly explain Iran’s resistance. At this point, it is no longer intelligence reporting. It is an empire writing fan fiction to avoid looking directly at the limits of its own power.
0:11

China has flatly rejected Reuters’ claim that it planned to supply Iran with 400 surface-to-air missiles. Beijing barely concealed its impatience—because it knows that what Washington needs is not the truth, but an excuse. The United States has been fighting Iran for more than five months without achieving the clean victory it expected. It has not broken Iran on the battlefield. It has not won the information war. It has not restored the illusion of effortless American supremacy. So now it needs a hidden mastermind. Washington cannot admit that a country it sanctioned, isolated, and impoverished for decades still refuses to collapse. The preferred explanation must therefore be: America is not failing against Iran. China is secretly controlling the war. Hence the convenient fantasy of 400 Chinese missiles. China is the perfect villain because blaming China preserves every other myth: American weapons remain invincible. American sanctions remain omnipotent. American strategy remains flawless. Only an unseen Chinese hand could possibly explain Iran’s resistance. At this point, it is no longer intelligence reporting. It is an empire writing fan fiction to avoid looking directly at the limits of its own power.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

121,135 次观看 • 12 天前

Iran just called Trump’s bluff. Its supreme leader was assassinated. Its nuclear sites were bombed. And it is winning the war that is left. Washington walked into a trap with three locked doors. Trump cannot settle: a tentative 60-day ceasefire has stalled for a week while he demands changes Iran rejects. He cannot walk away: the strait stays shut and the bill keeps running. And the House just voted 215 to 208 to rein him in, with the Senate one vote behind. But the door he can least afford to open is escalation, and this is the part no one is pricing. America is draining two reserves at once. It has pulled its Strategic Petroleum Reserve down 12% to 365 million barrels to hold the oil price down, and it has fired roughly 1,100 Tomahawks and 1,200 Patriots, weapons it needs years to rebuild. Both gauges fall on the same clock. Neither refills fast: the oil reserve is not projected back to pre-war levels until 2028. And Iran can see all of it. That is why Iran will not move. A country this battered is winning the only contest left, the contest of who can afford to wait. The screen still looks calm. Brent is back above $100. US stocks sat at record highs days ago. But that calm is bought with a draining reserve and a spent arsenal, and neither comes back for years. Trump called the vote meaningless. The market shrugged. Iran read it as a green light. This war is not being won on the battlefield. It is being won by whoever outlasts the other’s reserves. For the first time, that is not Washington.
0:10

Iran just called Trump’s bluff. Its supreme leader was assassinated. Its nuclear sites were bombed. And it is winning the war that is left. Washington walked into a trap with three locked doors. Trump cannot settle: a tentative 60-day ceasefire has stalled for a week while he demands changes Iran rejects. He cannot walk away: the strait stays shut and the bill keeps running. And the House just voted 215 to 208 to rein him in, with the Senate one vote behind. But the door he can least afford to open is escalation, and this is the part no one is pricing. America is draining two reserves at once. It has pulled its Strategic Petroleum Reserve down 12% to 365 million barrels to hold the oil price down, and it has fired roughly 1,100 Tomahawks and 1,200 Patriots, weapons it needs years to rebuild. Both gauges fall on the same clock. Neither refills fast: the oil reserve is not projected back to pre-war levels until 2028. And Iran can see all of it. That is why Iran will not move. A country this battered is winning the only contest left, the contest of who can afford to wait. The screen still looks calm. Brent is back above $100. US stocks sat at record highs days ago. But that calm is bought with a draining reserve and a spent arsenal, and neither comes back for years. Trump called the vote meaningless. The market shrugged. Iran read it as a green light. This war is not being won on the battlefield. It is being won by whoever outlasts the other’s reserves. For the first time, that is not Washington.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

78,401 次观看 • 2 个月前

President Trump is being duped on polling numbers about the popularity of War with Iran and does not realize it. CNN released a clearly fake or cherry picked poll saying that almost all of MAGA supports the War. This could not be further from the truth. If you think it is, go ask a few MAGA people in your actual life their thoughts on the War. A lot of them are strongly against it. But both the mainstream media and the neocons around President Trump want him to believe these numbers. The left leaning mainstream media want him to believe these numbers because the longer this war goes on, the better it works out for Democrats in upcoming elections. The right leaning mainstream media want him to believe it because their biggest donors are very pro war in Iran. The neocons surrounding him want him to believe it because then they can have the war in the Middle East they have always pushed for. I do not think President Trump is playing 4D chess with this war. I do not think he is super pro war. I do not think he cares about the Middle East that much. I just think he is being manipulated by the people around him and he does not realize it. The best thing for President Trump and the country as a whole is that he recognizes how unpopular this disaster is, corrects course by getting the United States out of involvement, and fires anyone who has lied to him about polling around him. Now to be clear, I do think there are many in MAGA who are suddenly pro this war, but that is just the people who would believe the sky is green and grass is blue if President Trump told them to. That does not represent the majority of the MAGA base. As always, I am not the holder of truth. This is just my assessment of the current situation.
0:14

President Trump is being duped on polling numbers about the popularity of War with Iran and does not realize it. CNN released a clearly fake or cherry picked poll saying that almost all of MAGA supports the War. This could not be further from the truth. If you think it is, go ask a few MAGA people in your actual life their thoughts on the War. A lot of them are strongly against it. But both the mainstream media and the neocons around President Trump want him to believe these numbers. The left leaning mainstream media want him to believe these numbers because the longer this war goes on, the better it works out for Democrats in upcoming elections. The right leaning mainstream media want him to believe it because their biggest donors are very pro war in Iran. The neocons surrounding him want him to believe it because then they can have the war in the Middle East they have always pushed for. I do not think President Trump is playing 4D chess with this war. I do not think he is super pro war. I do not think he cares about the Middle East that much. I just think he is being manipulated by the people around him and he does not realize it. The best thing for President Trump and the country as a whole is that he recognizes how unpopular this disaster is, corrects course by getting the United States out of involvement, and fires anyone who has lied to him about polling around him. Now to be clear, I do think there are many in MAGA who are suddenly pro this war, but that is just the people who would believe the sky is green and grass is blue if President Trump told them to. That does not represent the majority of the MAGA base. As always, I am not the holder of truth. This is just my assessment of the current situation.

End Tribalism in Politics

11,565 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇮🇷 ✅✅Iranian President Masoud Pezeskhian:✅✅ — The Islamic Republic of Iran will not compromise on defending its sovereignty, asserting that the United States of America must receive an appropriate response to its military aggression against Iran. Iran did not start any war. America is the one who initiated the aggression against us. If you were in our place, what would you do? It is natural for the aggressor to receive the appropriate response. We were subjected to a direct military attack, and we defended ourselves firmly and powerfully. We always declare our readiness for engagement and dialogue within the framework of international laws, but the other side does not accept logic; rather, it seeks to impose surrender on our people, and this is what we will never accept. It is self-evident that any aggression will be responded to in the appropriate manner. Our people will never surrender to force and threats.
0:12

🇮🇷 ✅✅Iranian President Masoud Pezeskhian:✅✅ — The Islamic Republic of Iran will not compromise on defending its sovereignty, asserting that the United States of America must receive an appropriate response to its military aggression against Iran. Iran did not start any war. America is the one who initiated the aggression against us. If you were in our place, what would you do? It is natural for the aggressor to receive the appropriate response. We were subjected to a direct military attack, and we defended ourselves firmly and powerfully. We always declare our readiness for engagement and dialogue within the framework of international laws, but the other side does not accept logic; rather, it seeks to impose surrender on our people, and this is what we will never accept. It is self-evident that any aggression will be responded to in the appropriate manner. Our people will never surrender to force and threats.

Dr. Renee Levant

54,229 次观看 • 1 年前

To Muslims who have seen the footage of Iranians burning mosques over the past days. One point must be made clear. The Islamic Republic is not merely using religion as a political tool. It is using religion as physical cover to carry out mass murder. My friends were present the day the first mosque was burned on Friday. I asked them what exactly they burned, because it was unclear on the video. They anwsered: “A mosque. But they were shooting at people from the inside.” If you believe it is acceptable to use a mosque as a military position to fire on civilians, then my conversation with you ends here. If you do not, then you should stand with the people of Iran, who are fighting a regime that exploits your religion to commit crimes in its name. The late Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was a devout Muslim. He survived multiple assassination attempts by Islamo-Marxists and other extremists. Those experiences brought him closer to God and to Islam. This may not resonate with everyone, but he remains the single historical figure I admire and respect most, and I will not speak against what he believed in. To my fellow Iranians, please read his book: 'Answer to History'. Today, it is his son, Reza Pahlavi, whom the people have chosen as their leader. Reza Pahlavi seeks internal peace for Iran. But internal peace is impossible without regional peace. A country does not exist in isolation. It is like buying a house, renovating it, and turning it into a beautiful place to live. If the neighbouring houses are crack dens, filled with violence and instability, your house will never truly be safe, nor will it hold its value. Under his leadership, religion will be separated from the state. Not erased. Separated. And an Iran without an antagonistic Islamic regime will bring regional stability. That stability will save the lives of millions of Muslims in the years to come.
0:13

To Muslims who have seen the footage of Iranians burning mosques over the past days. One point must be made clear. The Islamic Republic is not merely using religion as a political tool. It is using religion as physical cover to carry out mass murder. My friends were present the day the first mosque was burned on Friday. I asked them what exactly they burned, because it was unclear on the video. They anwsered: “A mosque. But they were shooting at people from the inside.” If you believe it is acceptable to use a mosque as a military position to fire on civilians, then my conversation with you ends here. If you do not, then you should stand with the people of Iran, who are fighting a regime that exploits your religion to commit crimes in its name. The late Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was a devout Muslim. He survived multiple assassination attempts by Islamo-Marxists and other extremists. Those experiences brought him closer to God and to Islam. This may not resonate with everyone, but he remains the single historical figure I admire and respect most, and I will not speak against what he believed in. To my fellow Iranians, please read his book: 'Answer to History'. Today, it is his son, Reza Pahlavi, whom the people have chosen as their leader. Reza Pahlavi seeks internal peace for Iran. But internal peace is impossible without regional peace. A country does not exist in isolation. It is like buying a house, renovating it, and turning it into a beautiful place to live. If the neighbouring houses are crack dens, filled with violence and instability, your house will never truly be safe, nor will it hold its value. Under his leadership, religion will be separated from the state. Not erased. Separated. And an Iran without an antagonistic Islamic regime will bring regional stability. That stability will save the lives of millions of Muslims in the years to come.

Arsalan Naamdar

18,294 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.
0:20

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

Bill Mitchell

82,791 次观看 • 1 个月前

Time, as the Rolling Stones said, is on my side. The Iranian side, that is. Iran is on land, commanding the Strait of Hormuz. The 'United States' is out at sea, and all of its base belong to us. Iran can break the imperial economy with its weapon of Mass Economic Destruction (MED), but the White Empire can't break them because they're used to it. The ships that didn't leave a month ago are not arriving just now and Iran just has to wait for the imperial economy to blow. Any minute now. Iran is not in a hurry to make (or break) this ceasefire. Their shots have already been fired and they just need to wait a little bit for 'America' to realize it. They can delay this day a bit using the futures market, but eventually the future becomes the present, and then what? All 'America' can do, in its furore, is close the strait even more, which just makes the straitjacket even tighter. 'America' has to move mountains to change their fate, but all Iran has to do is not move.
0:14

Time, as the Rolling Stones said, is on my side. The Iranian side, that is. Iran is on land, commanding the Strait of Hormuz. The 'United States' is out at sea, and all of its base belong to us. Iran can break the imperial economy with its weapon of Mass Economic Destruction (MED), but the White Empire can't break them because they're used to it. The ships that didn't leave a month ago are not arriving just now and Iran just has to wait for the imperial economy to blow. Any minute now. Iran is not in a hurry to make (or break) this ceasefire. Their shots have already been fired and they just need to wait a little bit for 'America' to realize it. They can delay this day a bit using the futures market, but eventually the future becomes the present, and then what? All 'America' can do, in its furore, is close the strait even more, which just makes the straitjacket even tighter. 'America' has to move mountains to change their fate, but all Iran has to do is not move.

indi.ca

19,844 次观看 • 3 个月前

Canada could send aid to Cuba. It chooses not to. Perfidious Canada’s state broadcaster does not list sanctions as a cause of Cuba’s crisis. Its coverage is propaganda, masking complicity while gaslighting Canadians about preventable suffering. It asks: “What explains a country that has hit rock bottom, drawing so much aggressive attention from the most powerful country on earth and why now?” The next ten minutes explore Trump’s business interests, Rubio’s family history, Florida exile politics, and presidential legacy. Canada never enters the frame. This is the Anglo-American Empire explaining itself to itself, and Carney’s narrative arm narrates it as “complicated.” It isn’t complicated. A country is being strangled. The most powerful power in the hemisphere is tightening the grip—and the CBC never centers the fact that Canada could act independently if Canada were sovereign. Canada is not a nation that has failed to act—it is a client state constitutionally incapable of action. The CBC does not center Canada’s capacity to act independently because Canada does not act independently. It relays. It complies. It performs virtue while holding the knife—because the knife is not its own.
0:11

Canada could send aid to Cuba. It chooses not to. Perfidious Canada’s state broadcaster does not list sanctions as a cause of Cuba’s crisis. Its coverage is propaganda, masking complicity while gaslighting Canadians about preventable suffering. It asks: “What explains a country that has hit rock bottom, drawing so much aggressive attention from the most powerful country on earth and why now?” The next ten minutes explore Trump’s business interests, Rubio’s family history, Florida exile politics, and presidential legacy. Canada never enters the frame. This is the Anglo-American Empire explaining itself to itself, and Carney’s narrative arm narrates it as “complicated.” It isn’t complicated. A country is being strangled. The most powerful power in the hemisphere is tightening the grip—and the CBC never centers the fact that Canada could act independently if Canada were sovereign. Canada is not a nation that has failed to act—it is a client state constitutionally incapable of action. The CBC does not center Canada’s capacity to act independently because Canada does not act independently. It relays. It complies. It performs virtue while holding the knife—because the knife is not its own.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

14,674 次观看 • 6 个月前

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?
0:16

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?

🇦🇪 Rashid bin Saeed : راشد بن سعيد

2,413,904 次观看 • 4 个月前

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?
0:16

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?

John F. Kennedy Jr Q

15,535 次观看 • 4 个月前

History has taught you have to choose between 1st World colonization or 3rd World immigration Your Will is either carved into reality or another’s Will is enacted upon you Life itself is a grand struggle between the conquered and the conquerer O but how forgetful is the mind of man in the days of his comfort Only until his land is overrun and his Race is all but gone does he realize this peace was a myth That surely there was war in his midst and he knew it not A bad steward always loses his inheritance and if he does not claim it… it is taken by another The question every man must as himself: Should I rule or be a subject? God will not judge your choice to be one or the other … but rather how you ruled or how you rendered to Caesar what rightfully belonged to him Humility isn’t defined as giving what is yours but in recognizing the power is yours to wield That the cost of doing nothing is greater than the cost of perhaps doing the wrong thing What will history say about you? About us? About our People? That of all men… The Europeans were the most virtuous of Rulers.
0:11

History has taught you have to choose between 1st World colonization or 3rd World immigration Your Will is either carved into reality or another’s Will is enacted upon you Life itself is a grand struggle between the conquered and the conquerer O but how forgetful is the mind of man in the days of his comfort Only until his land is overrun and his Race is all but gone does he realize this peace was a myth That surely there was war in his midst and he knew it not A bad steward always loses his inheritance and if he does not claim it… it is taken by another The question every man must as himself: Should I rule or be a subject? God will not judge your choice to be one or the other … but rather how you ruled or how you rendered to Caesar what rightfully belonged to him Humility isn’t defined as giving what is yours but in recognizing the power is yours to wield That the cost of doing nothing is greater than the cost of perhaps doing the wrong thing What will history say about you? About us? About our People? That of all men… The Europeans were the most virtuous of Rulers.

Christian Ascania🌞

79,829 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨Don’t stop talking about Iran. New footage just came out from Kermanshah showing what really happened on January 8. You can hear it clearly. Non stop gunfire. It does not pause. It does not slow down. It sounds like a battlefield because it was a battlefield. The regime was at war with its own people. Forces of the Islamic Republic were firing relentlessly into the streets. Not warning shots. Not crowd control. Just constant shooting at civilians. And here is what the world needs to understand. In just two days the Islamic Republic slaughtered more than forty thousand Iranians. Forty thousand human beings in forty eight hours. This is not unrest. This is not clashes. This is mass killing. If you are outside Iran and still think this is just politics, wake up. A regime that opens fire like this and massacres tens of thousands in two days is not a normal government. It is a killing machine. Do not look away. Silence is exactly what they want.
0:17

🚨Don’t stop talking about Iran. New footage just came out from Kermanshah showing what really happened on January 8. You can hear it clearly. Non stop gunfire. It does not pause. It does not slow down. It sounds like a battlefield because it was a battlefield. The regime was at war with its own people. Forces of the Islamic Republic were firing relentlessly into the streets. Not warning shots. Not crowd control. Just constant shooting at civilians. And here is what the world needs to understand. In just two days the Islamic Republic slaughtered more than forty thousand Iranians. Forty thousand human beings in forty eight hours. This is not unrest. This is not clashes. This is mass killing. If you are outside Iran and still think this is just politics, wake up. A regime that opens fire like this and massacres tens of thousands in two days is not a normal government. It is a killing machine. Do not look away. Silence is exactly what they want.

✡︎𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬🇮🇷🇮🇱

19,038 次观看 • 5 个月前

Not long ago, Turkey was running a neo-Ottoman project across the Arab world. The Muslim Brotherhood was the tool. Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, the Gulf media wars. Western analysts called it one of the defining threats to the regional order. They were right! That era is over! It did not end through Western pressure. It ended because Saudi Arabia spent a decade building the economic, religious and diplomatic weight that made accommodation with Riyadh worth more to Ankara than confrontation. Investment. Mediation. Religious authority. Doors quietly closed. Soft power in its least glamorous form, and its most effective. I think we should be grateful for that. We rarely are. Turkey is now moving toward the Arab world, not away from it. On 7 August, in Mecca, Erdoğan, Mohammed bin Salman and Shehbaz Sharif signed a joint defence agreement: an attack on one is an attack on all three. It did not come from nowhere. Ankara joined a Riyadh-led maritime coalition in late July, one of fourteen founding members. The 2023 drone contract was Turkey's largest defence export deal at the time. This is the Middle East Western analysts spent fifteen years asking for. Two days before the signing, Steven A. Cook published a column in Foreign Policy arguing that strategic blunders have plagued Saudi Arabia's approach to the region. The verdict arrived before the ink was dry. Read it closely and it collapses. Cook says Riyadh has no strategy. Then he lists it: protect the economic transformation, avoid a wider war, lower tensions with Iran, stop armed factions from imposing facts by force, tie normalisation with Israel to a Palestinian state. That is not the absence of a strategy. That is a hierarchy of priorities. His real objection is that it is not his strategy- one that would have Saudi Arabia tolerate the STC, hold the UAE partnership regardless of conflicting aims, welcome an Israeli foothold in Somaliland, and stand as the front line against Iran. He says the Sanaa runway strike was unnecessary. In the same breath he concedes Mahan Air is tied to the IRGC, and that the Houthi delegation may have carried more than pistachios and carpets. He accepts the violation, then faults the attempt to stop it. He also assigns the strike to Riyadh. Saudi Arabia never claimed it. Yemen's internationally recognised government announced it. Then the pattern. Restraint is weakness. Action is recklessness. De-escalation is buying calm. Interdiction is provocation. Cook recommends retreat, then cites the retreat as proof there is no strategy. And he blames Riyadh for the Houthi escalation - as if the Houthis had not been firing at Saudi cities for years, as if Iran's proxy project began this July. A possible Saudi miscalculation does not absolve Iran and the Houthis of their own violence! Underneath all of it sits the oldest false narrative in the file: that Saudi Arabia is weak. Remember Yemen. The Kingdom had the capability and the intent to end the Houthi project militarily. What constrained it was Western political pressure in the name of human rights - war powers votes, suspended munitions, withdrawn targeting support. Riyadh was told to stop. It stopped. Then it absorbed years of missiles and drones on its airports, its cities and its oil infrastructure while holding a truce it was never legally obliged to hold! You can argue the restrictions were right. You cannot impose them, watch the adversary rearm through the corridor you protected, and then call the result a Saudi failure. Restraint imposed by allies is not incapacity. Saudi Arabia is not the architect of this crisis. It is the state repeatedly asked to carry the cost of other people's strategies - and it is now building, with Ankara and Islamabad, an architecture that reduces its need to. The criticism came before the agreement was a week old. That says less about Saudi strategy than about how hard it is for some analysts to read an order they no longer write.
0:16

Not long ago, Turkey was running a neo-Ottoman project across the Arab world. The Muslim Brotherhood was the tool. Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, the Gulf media wars. Western analysts called it one of the defining threats to the regional order. They were right! That era is over! It did not end through Western pressure. It ended because Saudi Arabia spent a decade building the economic, religious and diplomatic weight that made accommodation with Riyadh worth more to Ankara than confrontation. Investment. Mediation. Religious authority. Doors quietly closed. Soft power in its least glamorous form, and its most effective. I think we should be grateful for that. We rarely are. Turkey is now moving toward the Arab world, not away from it. On 7 August, in Mecca, Erdoğan, Mohammed bin Salman and Shehbaz Sharif signed a joint defence agreement: an attack on one is an attack on all three. It did not come from nowhere. Ankara joined a Riyadh-led maritime coalition in late July, one of fourteen founding members. The 2023 drone contract was Turkey's largest defence export deal at the time. This is the Middle East Western analysts spent fifteen years asking for. Two days before the signing, Steven A. Cook published a column in Foreign Policy arguing that strategic blunders have plagued Saudi Arabia's approach to the region. The verdict arrived before the ink was dry. Read it closely and it collapses. Cook says Riyadh has no strategy. Then he lists it: protect the economic transformation, avoid a wider war, lower tensions with Iran, stop armed factions from imposing facts by force, tie normalisation with Israel to a Palestinian state. That is not the absence of a strategy. That is a hierarchy of priorities. His real objection is that it is not his strategy- one that would have Saudi Arabia tolerate the STC, hold the UAE partnership regardless of conflicting aims, welcome an Israeli foothold in Somaliland, and stand as the front line against Iran. He says the Sanaa runway strike was unnecessary. In the same breath he concedes Mahan Air is tied to the IRGC, and that the Houthi delegation may have carried more than pistachios and carpets. He accepts the violation, then faults the attempt to stop it. He also assigns the strike to Riyadh. Saudi Arabia never claimed it. Yemen's internationally recognised government announced it. Then the pattern. Restraint is weakness. Action is recklessness. De-escalation is buying calm. Interdiction is provocation. Cook recommends retreat, then cites the retreat as proof there is no strategy. And he blames Riyadh for the Houthi escalation - as if the Houthis had not been firing at Saudi cities for years, as if Iran's proxy project began this July. A possible Saudi miscalculation does not absolve Iran and the Houthis of their own violence! Underneath all of it sits the oldest false narrative in the file: that Saudi Arabia is weak. Remember Yemen. The Kingdom had the capability and the intent to end the Houthi project militarily. What constrained it was Western political pressure in the name of human rights - war powers votes, suspended munitions, withdrawn targeting support. Riyadh was told to stop. It stopped. Then it absorbed years of missiles and drones on its airports, its cities and its oil infrastructure while holding a truce it was never legally obliged to hold! You can argue the restrictions were right. You cannot impose them, watch the adversary rearm through the corridor you protected, and then call the result a Saudi failure. Restraint imposed by allies is not incapacity. Saudi Arabia is not the architect of this crisis. It is the state repeatedly asked to carry the cost of other people's strategies - and it is now building, with Ankara and Islamabad, an architecture that reduces its need to. The criticism came before the agreement was a week old. That says less about Saudi strategy than about how hard it is for some analysts to read an order they no longer write.

𝐌𝐢𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐞𝐥 𝐀𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢

421,316 次观看 • 3 天前

🚨BIG BREAKING: 🇺🇸 U.S. President Donald Trump warned Iran, saying that U.S. fighter jets carrying 20-ton bunker-buster bombs are ready to strike Iran's nuclear sites if nuclear activities resume. 🇮🇷 Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei responded that Iran is not afraid of U.S. threats and has shifted its nuclear activities to a new undisclosed location. 🇺🇸 Trump replied that it does not matter where Iran operates. The United States will find the site whenever it wants and destroy it completely. He warned that repeating the same mistake could bring severe consequences for Iran.
0:11

🚨BIG BREAKING: 🇺🇸 U.S. President Donald Trump warned Iran, saying that U.S. fighter jets carrying 20-ton bunker-buster bombs are ready to strike Iran's nuclear sites if nuclear activities resume. 🇮🇷 Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei responded that Iran is not afraid of U.S. threats and has shifted its nuclear activities to a new undisclosed location. 🇺🇸 Trump replied that it does not matter where Iran operates. The United States will find the site whenever it wants and destroy it completely. He warned that repeating the same mistake could bring severe consequences for Iran.

Israel_ForceX

33,531 次观看 • 16 天前

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🇩🇪 German Defense Minister:⚡ "Iran is not responsible for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — Donald Trump is." "The cork in the bottle of the Strait of Hormuz was pushed in by Donald Trump." He emphasized that Europe wants the Strait reopened only with the explicit consent of Iran and the Sultanate of Oman.🇮🇷🇴🇲 🔥 "If the United States wants to punish Europe over this position, let it." Europe will not allow its economy to be wrecked for a foolish and unnecessary reason.⚠️
0:11

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🇩🇪 German Defense Minister:⚡ "Iran is not responsible for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — Donald Trump is." "The cork in the bottle of the Strait of Hormuz was pushed in by Donald Trump." He emphasized that Europe wants the Strait reopened only with the explicit consent of Iran and the Sultanate of Oman.🇮🇷🇴🇲 🔥 "If the United States wants to punish Europe over this position, let it." Europe will not allow its economy to be wrecked for a foolish and unnecessary reason.⚠️

Mojtaba Khamenei Commentary

126,974 次观看 • 1 个月前

If the Universe’s only way to realize itself is through intelligent beings, why did it not protect life during earth’s evolution? Or does it have other purposes — and are we merely a byproduct of its creation? : If the Universe can only know itself through conscious minds, why did it let life on Earth teeter on the edge of extinction dozens of times? Asteroids, ice ages, supervolcanoes, and mass die-offs all struck without mercy. No shield, no mercy, no intervention. That silence is the answer. The Universe is not a guardian. It is an arena. It does not care whether intelligence ever arises, survives, or dies. The emergence of minds is not its goal; it is an accidental side effect of laws that permit complexity. We are not protected children of a loving cosmos. We are the rare, fragile spark that sometimes flickers into being inside an indifferent storm. Our existence proves nothing about cosmic purpose. It only proves that, out of countless dead rocks, one managed to keep the spark alive long enough to ask why. The Universe has no obligation to us. We have an obligation to the spark. That is the whole story.
0:15

If the Universe’s only way to realize itself is through intelligent beings, why did it not protect life during earth’s evolution? Or does it have other purposes — and are we merely a byproduct of its creation? : If the Universe can only know itself through conscious minds, why did it let life on Earth teeter on the edge of extinction dozens of times? Asteroids, ice ages, supervolcanoes, and mass die-offs all struck without mercy. No shield, no mercy, no intervention. That silence is the answer. The Universe is not a guardian. It is an arena. It does not care whether intelligence ever arises, survives, or dies. The emergence of minds is not its goal; it is an accidental side effect of laws that permit complexity. We are not protected children of a loving cosmos. We are the rare, fragile spark that sometimes flickers into being inside an indifferent storm. Our existence proves nothing about cosmic purpose. It only proves that, out of countless dead rocks, one managed to keep the spark alive long enough to ask why. The Universe has no obligation to us. We have an obligation to the spark. That is the whole story.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

272,822 次观看 • 8 个月前

As the E3 prepares to snapback all sanctions on Iran at the UN, it is important to understand what the E3's intentions are and what they are not. Netanyahu quoted the German Chancellor in his UN address (to a largely empty hall) that "Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us [by bombing Iran]." This was not just the absence of condemning Israel's act of aggression; this was a full-throated European endorsement of Israel starting a war. Given this significant statement, it is no longer justified to simply assume that the E3's actions with the snapback are designed to solve the nuclear issue peacefully. While that assumption had grounds earlier on, it no longer does. I have spoken to several European diplomats at the UN this week, and several expressed both discomfort and outright opposition to the E3 move, understanding both that its outcome and intent are problematic. But the E3 is not taking its cues from the EU, but from the White House. And its calculations have more to do with Ukraine and the transatlantic relationship than the nuclear file.
0:13

As the E3 prepares to snapback all sanctions on Iran at the UN, it is important to understand what the E3's intentions are and what they are not. Netanyahu quoted the German Chancellor in his UN address (to a largely empty hall) that "Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us [by bombing Iran]." This was not just the absence of condemning Israel's act of aggression; this was a full-throated European endorsement of Israel starting a war. Given this significant statement, it is no longer justified to simply assume that the E3's actions with the snapback are designed to solve the nuclear issue peacefully. While that assumption had grounds earlier on, it no longer does. I have spoken to several European diplomats at the UN this week, and several expressed both discomfort and outright opposition to the E3 move, understanding both that its outcome and intent are problematic. But the E3 is not taking its cues from the EU, but from the White House. And its calculations have more to do with Ukraine and the transatlantic relationship than the nuclear file.

Trita Parsi

60,373 次观看 • 10 个月前