Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

FAKE NEWS CNN just treated a White House press pass like a constitutional right and wheeled out Floyd Abrams to bless the panic. They want you to believe Trump banning CNN is the same as shutting down the First Amendment. It’s not. The First Amendment stops the government from...

GuntherEagleman's profile picture

Gunther Eagleman™

1,768,549 subscribers

68,319 Aufrufe • vor 12 Stunden •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

30 Kommentare

Profilbild von USaid What?
USaid What?vor 11 Stunden

This goes far beyond President Trump “not liking” someone for being unfair. The Fake News caused irreperrable damage to America and its citizens. President Trump is just in their way from spreading their cancerous propaganda.

Profilbild von CAP'N SCALAWAG
CAP'N SCALAWAGvor 11 Stunden

420 conservatives were denied access to the White House press room during Biden's presidency. *It's DIFFERENT when they do it..

Profilbild von Edward Shrum
Edward Shrumvor 11 Stunden

LMAO 😂 you Really are Stupid ‼️🎯 Can you Actually READ ⁉️🤔📢👇🏻

Profilbild von Suzan Cayou
Suzan Cayouvor 11 Stunden

CNN, et al is a propaganda organization that has an agenda that won’t let facts or truth get in their way.

Profilbild von MAGA Cult Slayer
MAGA Cult Slayervor 12 Stunden

A White House pass isn’t an unlimited constitutional right. But once access is open to press, the government can’t boot outlets for their viewpoint. Trump said CNN was barred over its reporting. That’s the part you deleted. #FRAMEVOLT

Profilbild von Lee Jeffers
Lee Jeffersvor 12 Stunden

I am from the UK @GuntherEagleman and i have so much respect for Trump banning these horrible news outlets!!

Profilbild von Tommy B. 🇺🇸
Tommy B. 🇺🇸vor 12 Stunden

Fuck CNN

Profilbild von GrizzledView
GrizzledViewvor 12 Stunden

What about when they wanted to bar Fox News.....how soon they forget

Profilbild von Redzee
Redzeevor 11 Stunden

CNN "STAFF" ARE NOT JOURNALISTS THEIR SOLE ROLE WAS TO ACT AS ANTI-TRUMP, PRO DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDISTS AND IT WAS A - C H O I C E AT ANY TIME THEY COULD HAVE ADOPTED --- F A I R & B A L A N C E D REPORTING. That's the Road they didn't take. Recall when Brian Stelther & Don Lemon (CNN) called on the Biden Admin to ban FOX?

Profilbild von Lisa Schulte
Lisa Schultevor 12 Stunden

CNN stands for Communist National News always has been and still is @CNN

Profilbild von GDPops
GDPopsvor 10 Stunden

Cnn's access to the White House is NOT a first amendment guarantee. In order to violate cnn's 1A right, DJT would have to pull the plug on their ability to transmit the news to anyone. That didn't happen. Cnn abused their invitation into the WH by exposing their anti administration bias so their invitation was revoked. CNN... "When you play stupid games... Expect To Win Stupid Prizes !!!"

Profilbild von cardinal157
cardinal157vor 10 Stunden

Nobody’s first amendment rights were violated. Read below.

Profilbild von SuzieinNY
SuzieinNYvor 11 Stunden

Oh. CNN throwing a non-gender hissy fit? Horrors!

Profilbild von Perry McIntyre
Perry McIntyrevor 10 Stunden

FAFO 2026 comes home to roost. 🤣

Profilbild von TheDemMigrantChildTraffickingRingof2020-24
TheDemMigrantChildTraffickingRingof2020-24vor 11 Stunden

Gas lighting America like they can’t read that the constitution doesn’t give CNN any rights moron. Lying about J6, the border, and much more means you’re not a media company, anyway.

Profilbild von Newman
Newmanvor 12 Stunden

CNN has done more to destroy America than any other tool the democrats have. Screw them.

Profilbild von AJH - Question Everything
AJH - Question Everythingvor 12 Stunden

He’s the master of winding them up. 🤣

Profilbild von Jimmy Encarnacion
Jimmy Encarnacionvor 11 Stunden

CNN wheeled out Mr Burns

Profilbild von Paula Jablonski
Paula Jablonskivor 11 Stunden

Thank you for the clarification!!

Profilbild von Antonio Orta
Antonio Ortavor 11 Stunden

No violation? No problem. Just wheel in the ‘expert,’ twist the facts into a pretzel, manufacture some outrage, and voilà! crapy News become the victims. When reality won’t cooperate, apparently all you need is an expert witness and a well-rehearsed victim card.

Profilbild von Lord Varys 🇺🇸
Lord Varys 🇺🇸vor 11 Stunden

CNN, YOU ARE NOT THE VICTIM. WE ARE! You got banned for a reason. Reflect. Stop whining. You did this to yourselves!

Profilbild von Ess Gee Dubbs
Ess Gee Dubbsvor 12 Stunden

Why are you selling stupid to your followers. If you strip seats based upon content, that is the government telling you what to print, stupid.

Profilbild von Maga Muslim 🇺🇸
Maga Muslim 🇺🇸vor 11 Stunden

CNN MSNOW And Politico Trying To Get Back In To The White House

Profilbild von Isabelle Marie Diy
Isabelle Marie Diyvor 12 Stunden

@CNN - Easy solution: Act like real media. Present facts how it is. Stop editorializing!!! Ur a news agency. NOT THE EXTENSION MOUTHPIECE OF DEMOCRATS!! Leave your partisan BS behind!!!

Profilbild von Chili
Chilivor 10 Stunden

There is plenty of press left in the White House press core we aren’t going to miss CNN.

Profilbild von Jacqueline Haack
Jacqueline Haackvor 11 Stunden

Rebuttal to his bullshit.

Profilbild von TexasVet
TexasVetvor 11 Stunden

In 2021 @brianstelter suggested the Biden admin should explore limiting Fox News press access. Noone said a damn thing about about constitional violations then. The MSM is cring about CNN, MSNBC and Politico being restricted. They are all untrustworthy!

Profilbild von bulldog hard
bulldog hardvor 10 Stunden

Did we all forget about when Biden did this? Oops my bad, there's still video of it

Profilbild von Joseph Janus
Joseph Janusvor 11 Stunden

Simple…just revoke CNN’s license…

Profilbild von Dave Adri Robeson Piasecki
Dave Adri Robeson Piaseckivor 11 Stunden

Now all these goofy a## leftys are repeated that ridiculous phrase they picke up on CNN ( Commie News Networks) 👇🏻👇🏻😆😆

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING — FAKE NEWS DENIED: MSNOW says this morning their reporters were BLOCKED access to the White House The Donald Trump bans on CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House are effective RIGHT NOW 🔥 "MS NOW journalists were denied access to the White House grounds." There are press outside the grounds right now, and MSNOW is hoping reporters stand in "solidarity" with them I'd like them to point me to the EXACT provision in the 1st Amendment where it says "you have a right to unlimited access to the White House" It's not there. MAYBE STOP LYING!
0:56

🚨 BREAKING — FAKE NEWS DENIED: MSNOW says this morning their reporters were BLOCKED access to the White House The Donald Trump bans on CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House are effective RIGHT NOW 🔥 "MS NOW journalists were denied access to the White House grounds." There are press outside the grounds right now, and MSNOW is hoping reporters stand in "solidarity" with them I'd like them to point me to the EXACT provision in the 1st Amendment where it says "you have a right to unlimited access to the White House" It's not there. MAYBE STOP LYING!

Eric Daugherty

772,346 Aufrufe • vor 22 Stunden

President Trump said he would block MS NOW, CNN and Politico from White House grounds. CNN and MS NOW said its journalists were denied access to the White House grounds Saturday. Press advocacy groups say the move is a violation of the First Amendment.
0:48

President Trump said he would block MS NOW, CNN and Politico from White House grounds. CNN and MS NOW said its journalists were denied access to the White House grounds Saturday. Press advocacy groups say the move is a violation of the First Amendment.

The Washington Post

87,932 Aufrufe • vor 16 Stunden

🔥 President Trump is now LAYING THE HAMMER after the Fake News WHINED that he blocked CNN/MSNOW/Politico from the White House "What I do ask is just a semblance of truth. CNN is fake news. MSNOW is fake news. They're fake news. They know it. They're putting there for a reason." "Politico was bailed out by our government from going out of business." No 1st Amendment right to have unlimited access to the president! And he can EASILY replace them with other fairer reporters. If they want in, they can start being honest. It's that simple!
0:45

🔥 President Trump is now LAYING THE HAMMER after the Fake News WHINED that he blocked CNN/MSNOW/Politico from the White House "What I do ask is just a semblance of truth. CNN is fake news. MSNOW is fake news. They're fake news. They know it. They're putting there for a reason." "Politico was bailed out by our government from going out of business." No 1st Amendment right to have unlimited access to the president! And he can EASILY replace them with other fairer reporters. If they want in, they can start being honest. It's that simple!

Eric Daugherty

35,197 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

Don Lemon on the White House Correspondents’ Dinner: “This is not normal. The Trump regime is trying to take away press freedom. They are trying to kill the First Amendment. You have to take a stand and if you’re in that room you are co-signing this. You are complicit in normalizing something that should not be normal”
1:43

Don Lemon on the White House Correspondents’ Dinner: “This is not normal. The Trump regime is trying to take away press freedom. They are trying to kill the First Amendment. You have to take a stand and if you’re in that room you are co-signing this. You are complicit in normalizing something that should not be normal”

Marco Foster

1,682,392 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Arresting Don Lemon makes him the face of the First Amendment. TWO Black journalists were arrested for covering a protest, NOT for protesting. The First Amendment protects the press. To be clear — I believe houses of worship should be off limits. Protesting inside churches is wrong. But COVERING those protests as a member of the press is NOT. Frankly, his arrest should scare you. If the government tells reporters what protests they can cover, who they can quote, or when they can show up — that’s a problem. That’s not a free country. You don’t get to arrest accredited journalists because you don’t like the optics. Trump made it personal. Now the whole country is watching. Don Lemon — this is your moment. And everyone else in media should be proud to have your back.
1:50

Arresting Don Lemon makes him the face of the First Amendment. TWO Black journalists were arrested for covering a protest, NOT for protesting. The First Amendment protects the press. To be clear — I believe houses of worship should be off limits. Protesting inside churches is wrong. But COVERING those protests as a member of the press is NOT. Frankly, his arrest should scare you. If the government tells reporters what protests they can cover, who they can quote, or when they can show up — that’s a problem. That’s not a free country. You don’t get to arrest accredited journalists because you don’t like the optics. Trump made it personal. Now the whole country is watching. Don Lemon — this is your moment. And everyone else in media should be proud to have your back.

Van Jones

36,463 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 NOW: President Trump says his move to ban CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House is 100% JUSTIFIED "They PURPOSEFULLY write negative news — they do that to diminish the Republicans and a Republican administration. Honestly, we've done a fantastic job." 💯 The rule is simple: they have a 1st Amendment to LIE all they want, but there is NO 1st Amendment to have unfettered access to the White House
0:49

🚨 NOW: President Trump says his move to ban CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House is 100% JUSTIFIED "They PURPOSEFULLY write negative news — they do that to diminish the Republicans and a Republican administration. Honestly, we've done a fantastic job." 💯 The rule is simple: they have a 1st Amendment to LIE all they want, but there is NO 1st Amendment to have unfettered access to the White House

Eric Daugherty

41,176 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

🚨CNN, MSNBC Gets THROWN OUT of White House as Reporters Scream and Cry On-Air Over Trump’s Fake News Ban They didn’t believe he’d actually do it until they scanned their badges and got denied. When Trump was banned from every social media platform, they cheered. Where was their love for Free Speech then? Going to the White House is a privilege, not a right. They’re still free to report on whatever they want, they just have to do it from somewhere else. The meltdowns are glorious 🤣
11:02

🚨CNN, MSNBC Gets THROWN OUT of White House as Reporters Scream and Cry On-Air Over Trump’s Fake News Ban They didn’t believe he’d actually do it until they scanned their badges and got denied. When Trump was banned from every social media platform, they cheered. Where was their love for Free Speech then? Going to the White House is a privilege, not a right. They’re still free to report on whatever they want, they just have to do it from somewhere else. The meltdowns are glorious 🤣

Benny Johnson

109,970 Aufrufe • vor 21 Stunden

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:
2:26

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:

Colion Noir

107,007 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🔥🚨 BREAKING — EXPOSED: Newly resurfaced footage from 2021 shows CNN talking about BANNING Fox News from the White House Press Pool: "Fox should be viewed as a political tool. That raises questions. Should it be part of the White House press pool?" "Should it be afforded the privileges that come with news gathering?" Democrat hypocrisy on FULL DISPLAY here. CNN and MSNBC are PEAK political propaganda and have only gotten worse as the years go by. President Trump acknowledged they are allowed to lie. Just not from the White House.
1:24

🔥🚨 BREAKING — EXPOSED: Newly resurfaced footage from 2021 shows CNN talking about BANNING Fox News from the White House Press Pool: "Fox should be viewed as a political tool. That raises questions. Should it be part of the White House press pool?" "Should it be afforded the privileges that come with news gathering?" Democrat hypocrisy on FULL DISPLAY here. CNN and MSNBC are PEAK political propaganda and have only gotten worse as the years go by. President Trump acknowledged they are allowed to lie. Just not from the White House.

The Patriot Oasis™

22,997 Aufrufe • vor 20 Stunden

🤔Reminder: this is the same Harvey Levin whose team cheered when Charlie Kirk had been assassinated. Now he’s suddenly playing civil liberties lawyer for Don Lemon and listen closely to what he’s saying. “Democracy under attack.” “Dictator playbook.” “Assault on the First Amendment.” He’s mixing up three different things purposefully for his millions of followers: Your right to publish. Your right to gather news. Your right to physically enter someone else’s property. Only the first one is close to absolute. The First Amendment protects speech and the press. It does not give journalists a free pass to plan a disruption of a church service, storm a church, blatantly ignore instructions to leave, and stop parishioners who are praying just so you can interview them for content later. Don wasn’t just filming. He actively participated. A church is private property. “Open to the public” is conditional, not permanent consent. If you’re told to leave and you refuse, that’s trespass. No sign is required. Calling this a “dictator playbook” or an “assault on democracy” is just narrative padding. If this were about punishing speech, that would be a real First Amendment issue. It’s not, it’s about conduct. Same with the grand jury talk. Grand juries decide probable cause, not guilt. That’s not corruption, that’s basic law. And search warrants don’t equal tyranny either. A judge signs them based on probable cause. If they’re wrong, you challenge them in court. That’s the system working. You can support a free press and still say this plainly: journalism is not a hall pass.
2:46

🤔Reminder: this is the same Harvey Levin whose team cheered when Charlie Kirk had been assassinated. Now he’s suddenly playing civil liberties lawyer for Don Lemon and listen closely to what he’s saying. “Democracy under attack.” “Dictator playbook.” “Assault on the First Amendment.” He’s mixing up three different things purposefully for his millions of followers: Your right to publish. Your right to gather news. Your right to physically enter someone else’s property. Only the first one is close to absolute. The First Amendment protects speech and the press. It does not give journalists a free pass to plan a disruption of a church service, storm a church, blatantly ignore instructions to leave, and stop parishioners who are praying just so you can interview them for content later. Don wasn’t just filming. He actively participated. A church is private property. “Open to the public” is conditional, not permanent consent. If you’re told to leave and you refuse, that’s trespass. No sign is required. Calling this a “dictator playbook” or an “assault on democracy” is just narrative padding. If this were about punishing speech, that would be a real First Amendment issue. It’s not, it’s about conduct. Same with the grand jury talk. Grand juries decide probable cause, not guilt. That’s not corruption, that’s basic law. And search warrants don’t equal tyranny either. A judge signs them based on probable cause. If they’re wrong, you challenge them in court. That’s the system working. You can support a free press and still say this plainly: journalism is not a hall pass.

Jammles

73,726 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

CNN plays a clip of Trump from 2016 saying he offered to build a ballroom for the White House. The response from the WH Press Secretary at the time: This is not something that was seriously considered. I’m not sure it would be appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House.
1:24

CNN plays a clip of Trump from 2016 saying he offered to build a ballroom for the White House. The response from the WH Press Secretary at the time: This is not something that was seriously considered. I’m not sure it would be appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House.

Acyn

154,764 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Former WH Press Sec Sarah Huckabee Sanders SHUTS DOWNS reporters crying about Trump banning CNN, MS Now and Politico from the White House “I think it’s hard for you to argue against a free press when you’re literally standing in the Oval Office asking questions of the president of the United States. He’s been more accessible and easier to talk to than any president in history. Think about the previous administration, where you could barely get through a press conference. And yet you have the opportunity to stand here in the Oval Office and ask questions to the leader of the free world […] The president is right to support the First Amendment. But he’s also right to ask that you be honest and fair. That’s not an unreasonable thing to ask.”
2:32

Former WH Press Sec Sarah Huckabee Sanders SHUTS DOWNS reporters crying about Trump banning CNN, MS Now and Politico from the White House “I think it’s hard for you to argue against a free press when you’re literally standing in the Oval Office asking questions of the president of the United States. He’s been more accessible and easier to talk to than any president in history. Think about the previous administration, where you could barely get through a press conference. And yet you have the opportunity to stand here in the Oval Office and ask questions to the leader of the free world […] The president is right to support the First Amendment. But he’s also right to ask that you be honest and fair. That’s not an unreasonable thing to ask.”

Townhall.com

219,267 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just threatened to shoot a U.S. citizen for exercising his First Amendment right to observe and film ICE activities… and it was all caught on camera. In the video, agents come up to a man’s car after stopping in front and behind him, aggressively pounding on his window and yelling: “This is your warning… stop fucking following us. You are impeding operations.” The man says, “This is my house. I’ve got to get to my house.” The agent then tells him, “This is your warning… go home to your kids.” Which is a chilling thing to say when a U.S. citizen is literally driving through his own neighborhood… and being told he isn’t allowed to do so. Then the camera pans to the other window, where another agent stands with his gun drawn. Not holstered. Gun in hand. The man rolls down his window and calmly says, “You should go to church.” The agent replies, “You’re making bad decisions.” Bad decisions… like driving in your own neighborhood? Filming? Breathing? And then the original agent comes back to the car yelling: “You are not going to like the outcome. I guarantee that.” They’re not being vague. They’re not cautioning him. What they mean by “the outcome” is spelled out seconds later: “Go home to your children. It’s Sunday. Did you not learn from what just happened?” This is a threat. This is intimidation. This is armed government agents using lethal force as a warning against constitutional rights. They are telling the public that anyone who observes them, anyone who films them, anyone who doesn’t immediately disappear, can expect the same outcome as Renee Good. And that is exactly how we know the government does not believe that shooting was self-defense. Because you don’t use “self‑defense” as a warning to people who haven’t done anything wrong.
1:49

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just threatened to shoot a U.S. citizen for exercising his First Amendment right to observe and film ICE activities… and it was all caught on camera. In the video, agents come up to a man’s car after stopping in front and behind him, aggressively pounding on his window and yelling: “This is your warning… stop fucking following us. You are impeding operations.” The man says, “This is my house. I’ve got to get to my house.” The agent then tells him, “This is your warning… go home to your kids.” Which is a chilling thing to say when a U.S. citizen is literally driving through his own neighborhood… and being told he isn’t allowed to do so. Then the camera pans to the other window, where another agent stands with his gun drawn. Not holstered. Gun in hand. The man rolls down his window and calmly says, “You should go to church.” The agent replies, “You’re making bad decisions.” Bad decisions… like driving in your own neighborhood? Filming? Breathing? And then the original agent comes back to the car yelling: “You are not going to like the outcome. I guarantee that.” They’re not being vague. They’re not cautioning him. What they mean by “the outcome” is spelled out seconds later: “Go home to your children. It’s Sunday. Did you not learn from what just happened?” This is a threat. This is intimidation. This is armed government agents using lethal force as a warning against constitutional rights. They are telling the public that anyone who observes them, anyone who films them, anyone who doesn’t immediately disappear, can expect the same outcome as Renee Good. And that is exactly how we know the government does not believe that shooting was self-defense. Because you don’t use “self‑defense” as a warning to people who haven’t done anything wrong.

Jesus Freakin Congress

681,314 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 President Trump just TRIPLED DOWN on his ban of CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from the White House straight from the Oval Office "They PURPOSELY write negative news, and they do that because they want to try and diminish the Republicans in a Republican administration." "They're FAKE NEWS. You get SO TIRED of reading and seeing fake news. When you look at CNN, it's just fake. That's why their ratings are no good. When you look at MS NOW.. it's fake news. It's fake news." Yep. No notes. MSNOW in particular is just a propaganda outlet with leftist whining all day. Not a real news organization, and they have no business in the Oval Office.
2:49

🚨 President Trump just TRIPLED DOWN on his ban of CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from the White House straight from the Oval Office "They PURPOSELY write negative news, and they do that because they want to try and diminish the Republicans in a Republican administration." "They're FAKE NEWS. You get SO TIRED of reading and seeing fake news. When you look at CNN, it's just fake. That's why their ratings are no good. When you look at MS NOW.. it's fake news. It's fake news." Yep. No notes. MSNOW in particular is just a propaganda outlet with leftist whining all day. Not a real news organization, and they have no business in the Oval Office.

Nick Sortor

79,020 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

🚨 WOW! President Trump is DOUBLING DOWN to the Fake News on banning CNN, MSNOW and POLITICO from the White House "MSDNC — Democratic National Committee! It's fake news." REPORTER: Sir, the 1st Amendment TRUMP: EXCUSE ME...the government gave POLITICO $8M to keep them afloat. There's a lot of news, other can join. Our country HAS TO HAVE HONEST NEWS. You don't have a country without borders, good voting, and a FREE and FAIR PRESS. He's within his FULL right to do it. If media outlets want access, they should start telling the truth Trump gave them PLENTY of warning. Replace all 3 outlets with newer, independent reporters! Expect them to try and sue 🤣
1:42

🚨 WOW! President Trump is DOUBLING DOWN to the Fake News on banning CNN, MSNOW and POLITICO from the White House "MSDNC — Democratic National Committee! It's fake news." REPORTER: Sir, the 1st Amendment TRUMP: EXCUSE ME...the government gave POLITICO $8M to keep them afloat. There's a lot of news, other can join. Our country HAS TO HAVE HONEST NEWS. You don't have a country without borders, good voting, and a FREE and FAIR PRESS. He's within his FULL right to do it. If media outlets want access, they should start telling the truth Trump gave them PLENTY of warning. Replace all 3 outlets with newer, independent reporters! Expect them to try and sue 🤣

Eric Daugherty

116,837 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

BREAKING: In a refreshing twist at the The White House today, questions were not only answered (for the first time in four years) but answered head-on. The Donald J. Trump Press Secretary (Karoline Leavitt) Karoline Leavitt didn’t shy away from the tough ones, going head-to-head with some journalists—the usual suspects—and holding her ground with confidence and clarity. In the midst of the lively exchanges, there was a major announcement that hit close to home: my hard pass is being restored. Yes, you read that right—justice and press access are making a comeback. The briefing had the kind of directness and transparency many have been waiting for after four years of lies. I believe it is setting a tone that signals accountability and bold leadership, and is shaping up to be a White House press room to watch. Stay tuned—things are only getting started.
46:52

BREAKING: In a refreshing twist at the The White House today, questions were not only answered (for the first time in four years) but answered head-on. The Donald J. Trump Press Secretary (Karoline Leavitt) Karoline Leavitt didn’t shy away from the tough ones, going head-to-head with some journalists—the usual suspects—and holding her ground with confidence and clarity. In the midst of the lively exchanges, there was a major announcement that hit close to home: my hard pass is being restored. Yes, you read that right—justice and press access are making a comeback. The briefing had the kind of directness and transparency many have been waiting for after four years of lies. I believe it is setting a tone that signals accountability and bold leadership, and is shaping up to be a White House press room to watch. Stay tuned—things are only getting started.

Simon Ateba

60,532 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.David Sacks explains the "Rise of the Woke Right" Sacks on college protests sweeping across the US: "The Constitution of the United States in the First Amendment provides for the right of assembly, which includes protest and sit-ins, as long as they're peaceable." "Now, obviously, if they go too far and they vandalize or break into buildings or use violence, then that's not peaceable." "However, there's all these people out there now making the argument that if you hear something from a protester that you don't like and you subjectively experience that as a threat to your safety, then that somehow should be treated as valid, like that's basically violent. That's not what the Constitution says." "We have the rise of the 'Woke Right' now. They're buying into this idea of safetyism, which is, 'being exposed to ideas you don't like, to protests you don't like is a threat to your safety.' No it's not." "We absolutely have snowflakery on both sides now."
0:55

.David Sacks explains the "Rise of the Woke Right" Sacks on college protests sweeping across the US: "The Constitution of the United States in the First Amendment provides for the right of assembly, which includes protest and sit-ins, as long as they're peaceable." "Now, obviously, if they go too far and they vandalize or break into buildings or use violence, then that's not peaceable." "However, there's all these people out there now making the argument that if you hear something from a protester that you don't like and you subjectively experience that as a threat to your safety, then that somehow should be treated as valid, like that's basically violent. That's not what the Constitution says." "We have the rise of the 'Woke Right' now. They're buying into this idea of safetyism, which is, 'being exposed to ideas you don't like, to protests you don't like is a threat to your safety.' No it's not." "We absolutely have snowflakery on both sides now."

The All-In Podcast

125,411 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.
2:38

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.

DocumentingLibs

69,376 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat