Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Fall Deeper, Keep Watching, Keep Stroking #hypno #porn #pmv #brainwash #mindfuck #spiral #obey #control #cum #edge #stroke #hypnosis #slut #sissy #nsfw #control

FemSubSissy

2,011 subscribers

33,088 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #hypno #porn #pmv #brainwash #mindfuck #spiral #obey #control #cum #edge #stroke #hypnosis #slut #sissy #nsfw #control

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Come closer, my hypno slut~ 💜 Mommy’s in a good mood today… so let Me take control and use you completely. Relax… drop deep… and let Mommy’s words melt your weak mind while I turn you into My perfect, obedient goon toy 😵‍💫 DM Me now and surrender~ #hypnosis #sissy #bdsm

Sensitive content

Come closer, my hypno slut~ 💜 Mommy’s in a good mood today… so let Me take control and use you completely. Relax… drop deep… and let Mommy’s words melt your weak mind while I turn you into My perfect, obedient goon toy 😵‍💫 DM Me now and surrender~ #hypnosis #sissy #bdsm

𝕐𝕠𝕦𝕣 𝔽𝕒𝕧𝕠𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕖ℍ𝕪𝕡𝕟𝕠𝕤𝕚𝕤𝕄𝕠𝕞𝕞𝕪

73,900 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"Weeping may be the closest experience human beings have to actual enlightenment. Because in weeping, you have given up. You've broken down. Whatever control you wanted over the world has slipped out of your hands. Whatever way you wanted to keep heartbreak at bay, whatever way you wanted to keep grief at bay, they've all been broken down by the grief, the loss, the person leaving you, by the diagnosis you've just been given in the hospital. You've actually dropped down below this perimeter, and it breaks apart through that overflow of emotions. The reason you're weeping is you haven't built a body that can hold that revelation. But now you're just about to do it. You're breaking open this controlled edge that you've had, and it's breaking out of there. You're becoming larger through the weeping. It's worth trying to have a practice of weeping, even if you can't go into full weeping, to feel the emotion as much as you can, because emotion is a doorway to something much deeper. Camus, the great French philosopher, said: 'live to the point of tears.'" — David Whyte

"Weeping may be the closest experience human beings have to actual enlightenment. Because in weeping, you have given up. You've broken down. Whatever control you wanted over the world has slipped out of your hands. Whatever way you wanted to keep heartbreak at bay, whatever way you wanted to keep grief at bay, they've all been broken down by the grief, the loss, the person leaving you, by the diagnosis you've just been given in the hospital. You've actually dropped down below this perimeter, and it breaks apart through that overflow of emotions. The reason you're weeping is you haven't built a body that can hold that revelation. But now you're just about to do it. You're breaking open this controlled edge that you've had, and it's breaking out of there. You're becoming larger through the weeping. It's worth trying to have a practice of weeping, even if you can't go into full weeping, to feel the emotion as much as you can, because emotion is a doorway to something much deeper. Camus, the great French philosopher, said: 'live to the point of tears.'" — David Whyte

How I Write Clips

47,015 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 There’s a simple rule in statecraft : when you’re stuck in a hole, stop digging. But India seems determined to keep digging itself deeper. After being saved from disaster and total military defeat on May 10th thanks to Trump’s timely intervention, New Delhi is now turning on the very man who pulled them back from the edge. The question is obvious: if you despised Trump so much, why did you beg for his help when your back was against the wall? In a desperate attempt to appease the Sangh loyalists and right-wing cultists at home, India is about to wreck what little remains of its international credibility, by attacking Trump. Instead of damage control, they’re opting for self-inflicted shame. We know that another reckless misadventure is being planned by India against Pakistan. But this time, if Pakistan hits back hard and it will, Modi may discover that Trump is no longer interested in saving him a second time. When arrogance replaces strategy, isolation is the inevitable result. India is walking straight into that trap.

🚨 There’s a simple rule in statecraft : when you’re stuck in a hole, stop digging. But India seems determined to keep digging itself deeper. After being saved from disaster and total military defeat on May 10th thanks to Trump’s timely intervention, New Delhi is now turning on the very man who pulled them back from the edge. The question is obvious: if you despised Trump so much, why did you beg for his help when your back was against the wall? In a desperate attempt to appease the Sangh loyalists and right-wing cultists at home, India is about to wreck what little remains of its international credibility, by attacking Trump. Instead of damage control, they’re opting for self-inflicted shame. We know that another reckless misadventure is being planned by India against Pakistan. But this time, if Pakistan hits back hard and it will, Modi may discover that Trump is no longer interested in saving him a second time. When arrogance replaces strategy, isolation is the inevitable result. India is walking straight into that trap.

Ahmad Hassan Al-Arbi

18,214 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THE 5 BIGGEST BOTTLENECKS POWERING THE AI ECONOMY The way I'm thinking about AI winners today is that the market is moving beyond the simple question of which mega-cap company spends most on AI and has been rewarding the companies that control the scarce inputs, contracted capacity, data movement, power infrastructure, edge compute and workflow layers that make the AI economy function. These are the five bottlenecks I'm watching most: • Memory | $MU, Samsung, SK Hynix Memory is the clearest scarce input because HBM feeds the accelerator, only a few companies can make it at volume and buyers are locking in supply through long-term agreements that create revenue visibility through the end of the decade. • Connectivity | $AVGO, $MRVL, $ALAB, $CRDO, $AAOI, $ANET Connectivity determines whether AI clusters can move data fast enough because training runs span tens of thousands of chips that need to act like one machine. Once copper runs out of reach that causes the cluster depends on optics, retimers, switches and custom silicon to keep the system moving. • Power | $CEG, $VST, $GEV, $FPS, $VRT, $NVTS, $TLN, $ON Power determines whether new AI data centers can actually come online because the binding constraint is shifting from getting chips to getting megawatts so the value flows to the companies that control generation, grid equipment, power delivery, thermal management and efficiency. • Compute | $NBIS, $CIFR, $IREN, $APLD, $WULF, $CORZ, $CRWV Compute capacity is overflow layer when hyperscalers are sold out. Capital alone doesn't guarantee GPU access which is why buyers are signing multi-year contracts for clusters before they are even fully built. • CPU | $NVDA, $AMD, $INTC, $ARM, $QCOM On-device CPU (edge compute) becomes next bottleneck as AI moves into inference, agents, PCs, phones, vehicles and physical devices.

THE 5 BIGGEST BOTTLENECKS POWERING THE AI ECONOMY The way I'm thinking about AI winners today is that the market is moving beyond the simple question of which mega-cap company spends most on AI and has been rewarding the companies that control the scarce inputs, contracted capacity, data movement, power infrastructure, edge compute and workflow layers that make the AI economy function. These are the five bottlenecks I'm watching most: • Memory | $MU, Samsung, SK Hynix Memory is the clearest scarce input because HBM feeds the accelerator, only a few companies can make it at volume and buyers are locking in supply through long-term agreements that create revenue visibility through the end of the decade. • Connectivity | $AVGO, $MRVL, $ALAB, $CRDO, $AAOI, $ANET Connectivity determines whether AI clusters can move data fast enough because training runs span tens of thousands of chips that need to act like one machine. Once copper runs out of reach that causes the cluster depends on optics, retimers, switches and custom silicon to keep the system moving. • Power | $CEG, $VST, $GEV, $FPS, $VRT, $NVTS, $TLN, $ON Power determines whether new AI data centers can actually come online because the binding constraint is shifting from getting chips to getting megawatts so the value flows to the companies that control generation, grid equipment, power delivery, thermal management and efficiency. • Compute | $NBIS, $CIFR, $IREN, $APLD, $WULF, $CORZ, $CRWV Compute capacity is overflow layer when hyperscalers are sold out. Capital alone doesn't guarantee GPU access which is why buyers are signing multi-year contracts for clusters before they are even fully built. • CPU | $NVDA, $AMD, $INTC, $ARM, $QCOM On-device CPU (edge compute) becomes next bottleneck as AI moves into inference, agents, PCs, phones, vehicles and physical devices.

Shay Boloor

108,564 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

You ever notice how the biggest political moves never come with fireworks—they slip in quiet, like background updates on your phone, rewriting the system while you’re distracted by the latest scandal? That’s where we are right now. In the last two weeks, America’s political stage pulled off some wild shifts, and most people didn’t even clock them. First off—Trump flexed federal power over policing, dropping National Guard deployments and dangling funding like a mob boss. The narrative is “law and order,” but the reality is: the White House deciding which states get punished for cashless bail or progressive reforms. That’s not safety, that’s federal overreach with a PR spin. And the trap? Democrats can either fight it and look “soft on crime,” or stay silent and normalize it. Either way, the rules of federalism just got rewritten when nobody was paying attention. Second—history itself is under attack. Through an order with a name straight out of Orwell, Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History, the Smithsonian’s exhibits on race, LGBTQ+ rights, even civil rights, are being gutted. Imagine scrubbing out the messy parts of America until what’s left is a highlight reel for a propaganda campaign. That’s not just museums, that’s national identity being curated for power. That’s how authoritarian regimes cement their myths—erase the record, then control the future. Third—Trump actually fired a Federal Reserve governor. Think about that. The Fed is supposed to be untouchable, independent, boring on purpose so no president can rig the economy. That firewall just got blown open. If this stands, every future president can treat the Fed like another cabinet post. That means your mortgage, your savings, your rent, all ride on political loyalty instead of financial stability. It’s the kind of move that doesn’t spark headlines because it sounds “wonky,” but in reality it’s massive—like pulling a Jenga block out from the bottom of the tower. Fourth—gerrymandering hit a new level in Texas. Mid-decade redistricting, not waiting for the census. Translation: redraw the map early to grab seats before voters even get to breathe. And here’s the kicker—while most of America shrugs, this is how democracy breaks without tanks in the streets. Quiet, technical, legalistic theft of representation. A Reuters poll already shows 57% of Americans think democracy is in danger. They’re not paranoid—it’s literally happening in real time. Put it all together and the pattern is clear. These aren’t random fights, they’re chess moves. Control the narrative (Smithsonian). Control the institutions (Fed). Control the maps (Texas). Control the cops (National Guard). That’s not democracy—it’s consolidation. The blind spot is that we keep watching the spectacle, waiting for some explosive event to signal “the coup is here,” when in reality, the coup is death by a thousand paper cuts. The loudest threats are distractions. The real power grabs are quiet, structural, boring by design—because boring doesn’t trend. But boring is where empires fall.

You ever notice how the biggest political moves never come with fireworks—they slip in quiet, like background updates on your phone, rewriting the system while you’re distracted by the latest scandal? That’s where we are right now. In the last two weeks, America’s political stage pulled off some wild shifts, and most people didn’t even clock them. First off—Trump flexed federal power over policing, dropping National Guard deployments and dangling funding like a mob boss. The narrative is “law and order,” but the reality is: the White House deciding which states get punished for cashless bail or progressive reforms. That’s not safety, that’s federal overreach with a PR spin. And the trap? Democrats can either fight it and look “soft on crime,” or stay silent and normalize it. Either way, the rules of federalism just got rewritten when nobody was paying attention. Second—history itself is under attack. Through an order with a name straight out of Orwell, Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History, the Smithsonian’s exhibits on race, LGBTQ+ rights, even civil rights, are being gutted. Imagine scrubbing out the messy parts of America until what’s left is a highlight reel for a propaganda campaign. That’s not just museums, that’s national identity being curated for power. That’s how authoritarian regimes cement their myths—erase the record, then control the future. Third—Trump actually fired a Federal Reserve governor. Think about that. The Fed is supposed to be untouchable, independent, boring on purpose so no president can rig the economy. That firewall just got blown open. If this stands, every future president can treat the Fed like another cabinet post. That means your mortgage, your savings, your rent, all ride on political loyalty instead of financial stability. It’s the kind of move that doesn’t spark headlines because it sounds “wonky,” but in reality it’s massive—like pulling a Jenga block out from the bottom of the tower. Fourth—gerrymandering hit a new level in Texas. Mid-decade redistricting, not waiting for the census. Translation: redraw the map early to grab seats before voters even get to breathe. And here’s the kicker—while most of America shrugs, this is how democracy breaks without tanks in the streets. Quiet, technical, legalistic theft of representation. A Reuters poll already shows 57% of Americans think democracy is in danger. They’re not paranoid—it’s literally happening in real time. Put it all together and the pattern is clear. These aren’t random fights, they’re chess moves. Control the narrative (Smithsonian). Control the institutions (Fed). Control the maps (Texas). Control the cops (National Guard). That’s not democracy—it’s consolidation. The blind spot is that we keep watching the spectacle, waiting for some explosive event to signal “the coup is here,” when in reality, the coup is death by a thousand paper cuts. The loudest threats are distractions. The real power grabs are quiet, structural, boring by design—because boring doesn’t trend. But boring is where empires fall.

Carina C. C

32,753 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Tucker Carlson warns that Tim Walz and Mayor Frey are deliberately fueling chaos to spark a “color revolution.” He asks: “Why would a state refuse to protect American citizens from murder, refuse to give the names or whereabouts of murderers and child molesters, and refuse to use its own cops to keep riots under control? What could possibly be the answer?” “Because they want riots, that’s why,” Carlson answered. “What you’re watching are the beginnings of a color revolution, of a kind of insurrection against federal authority. And what you have to ask yourself… Can you live with that? Can you live in a country of 50 states that don’t agree on what the federal law should be and that allow Americans to get murdered in their cities because they have the wrong politics or they work for a politician they disapprove of? “And if you are okay with that, have you thought through its implications? The number one implication is the country will fall apart. That’s civil war. It’s the definition of it. You have regions and internal government states that don’t recognize federal authority, the authority of a government over them all, of Washington. “And at that point, what you have is warring nations within the same borders. And then you have widespread violence, then you have killing at scale, then you have civil war.”

Tucker Carlson warns that Tim Walz and Mayor Frey are deliberately fueling chaos to spark a “color revolution.” He asks: “Why would a state refuse to protect American citizens from murder, refuse to give the names or whereabouts of murderers and child molesters, and refuse to use its own cops to keep riots under control? What could possibly be the answer?” “Because they want riots, that’s why,” Carlson answered. “What you’re watching are the beginnings of a color revolution, of a kind of insurrection against federal authority. And what you have to ask yourself… Can you live with that? Can you live in a country of 50 states that don’t agree on what the federal law should be and that allow Americans to get murdered in their cities because they have the wrong politics or they work for a politician they disapprove of? “And if you are okay with that, have you thought through its implications? The number one implication is the country will fall apart. That’s civil war. It’s the definition of it. You have regions and internal government states that don’t recognize federal authority, the authority of a government over them all, of Washington. “And at that point, what you have is warring nations within the same borders. And then you have widespread violence, then you have killing at scale, then you have civil war.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

75,185 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Did Candace Owens prove Kamala Harris was Black? Did Candace prove Macron's wife has a penis? I'm asking these two questions because the answers shine a light on the exact pattern we're dealing with right now. See, once we spot the pattern—like Candace herself loves to say, "We're gettin' close"—but this time for real, not for manipulation. We have to understand what Candace Owens is actually doing, how she does it, and how to recognize it so it doesn't happen again. If someone's not already all-in behind her, they're definitely watching, taking notes, and seeing how this so-called "investigation" can be used to control an audience, keep them hooked, and monetize outrage. We have to grasp how severe this topic really is. I'd argue it's one of the most important issues facing America today. Don't fall for the repeated words and phrases she hammers over and over until something feels "true" just because it's loud and constant. We have stronger minds than that. We must step back, drop the tribal mindset, and look at the situation with integrity, honesty, and a genuine pursuit of truth. That's what I'm trying to teach—to Candace's followers especially. **Proverbs 18:17** (NIV): "In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines." Truth doesn't need endless repetition to stand. It stands on facts, evidence, and discernment—not volume, not vibes, not psyop buzzwords. Step back. Question the pattern. Seek truth with integrity. We can do better than this. Bronson Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

Did Candace Owens prove Kamala Harris was Black? Did Candace prove Macron's wife has a penis? I'm asking these two questions because the answers shine a light on the exact pattern we're dealing with right now. See, once we spot the pattern—like Candace herself loves to say, "We're gettin' close"—but this time for real, not for manipulation. We have to understand what Candace Owens is actually doing, how she does it, and how to recognize it so it doesn't happen again. If someone's not already all-in behind her, they're definitely watching, taking notes, and seeing how this so-called "investigation" can be used to control an audience, keep them hooked, and monetize outrage. We have to grasp how severe this topic really is. I'd argue it's one of the most important issues facing America today. Don't fall for the repeated words and phrases she hammers over and over until something feels "true" just because it's loud and constant. We have stronger minds than that. We must step back, drop the tribal mindset, and look at the situation with integrity, honesty, and a genuine pursuit of truth. That's what I'm trying to teach—to Candace's followers especially. Proverbs 18:17 (NIV): "In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines." Truth doesn't need endless repetition to stand. It stands on facts, evidence, and discernment—not volume, not vibes, not psyop buzzwords. Step back. Question the pattern. Seek truth with integrity. We can do better than this. Bronson Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

The Coldblooded Christian

23,659 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

FORMER NATO SUPREME COMMANDER: THIS WAR IS NOW EXISTENTIAL FOR US HEGEMONY — NO EXIT ALLOWED Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Wesley Clark just laid out the real thinking inside Washington. This is no longer about Iran. It is about whether the United States remains the global hegemon or watches its power collapse in real time. Stopping is not an option. That is the hard line now being drawn. THE EXISTENTIAL STAKES ➡️ Clark makes it clear: if America pulls back and lets Iran keep control of the Strait of Hormuz, the hit to US global leadership is permanent. ➡️ He warns it would damage American deterrence, weaken influence in Asia, and undermine the security of Europe in one stroke. ➡️ This is the decision point. Failure here is not a temporary setback. It is the end of the post-1945 order. THE NO-EXIT REALITY ➡️ Clark rejects any idea of simply walking away or signing a weaker deal. ➡️ “Pulling back, that’s no good,” he states without hesitation. ➡️ An MOU worse than the last one would signal American weakness to every rival watching. ➡️ China and Russia are already feeling good about the current trajectory. Clark says they should not be allowed to celebrate further. THE STRATEGIC TRAP ➡️ There is no easy military solution, yet retreat is worse. ➡️ The near-term fight must stay focused on keeping the Strait open and isolating the theater of operations. ➡️ Any pause only gives Iran time to rebuild, rearm, and dig in deeper. ➡️ Clark insists the longer-term threat of Iranian missiles and nuclear capability cannot be ignored either. THE BOTTOM LINE Wesley Clark is not speaking as a pundit. He is speaking as a former NATO Supreme Commander who understands exactly how the deep state and neoconservative core in Washington now view this conflict. This war has become existential for American global power. Stopping is no longer on the table. HT: YouTube Piers Morgan Uncensored #WesleyClark #IranWar #USHegemony #NoExit #GlobalLeadership #StraitOfHormuz #AmericanPower

FORMER NATO SUPREME COMMANDER: THIS WAR IS NOW EXISTENTIAL FOR US HEGEMONY — NO EXIT ALLOWED Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Wesley Clark just laid out the real thinking inside Washington. This is no longer about Iran. It is about whether the United States remains the global hegemon or watches its power collapse in real time. Stopping is not an option. That is the hard line now being drawn. THE EXISTENTIAL STAKES ➡️ Clark makes it clear: if America pulls back and lets Iran keep control of the Strait of Hormuz, the hit to US global leadership is permanent. ➡️ He warns it would damage American deterrence, weaken influence in Asia, and undermine the security of Europe in one stroke. ➡️ This is the decision point. Failure here is not a temporary setback. It is the end of the post-1945 order. THE NO-EXIT REALITY ➡️ Clark rejects any idea of simply walking away or signing a weaker deal. ➡️ “Pulling back, that’s no good,” he states without hesitation. ➡️ An MOU worse than the last one would signal American weakness to every rival watching. ➡️ China and Russia are already feeling good about the current trajectory. Clark says they should not be allowed to celebrate further. THE STRATEGIC TRAP ➡️ There is no easy military solution, yet retreat is worse. ➡️ The near-term fight must stay focused on keeping the Strait open and isolating the theater of operations. ➡️ Any pause only gives Iran time to rebuild, rearm, and dig in deeper. ➡️ Clark insists the longer-term threat of Iranian missiles and nuclear capability cannot be ignored either. THE BOTTOM LINE Wesley Clark is not speaking as a pundit. He is speaking as a former NATO Supreme Commander who understands exactly how the deep state and neoconservative core in Washington now view this conflict. This war has become existential for American global power. Stopping is no longer on the table. HT: YouTube Piers Morgan Uncensored #WesleyClark #IranWar #USHegemony #NoExit #GlobalLeadership #StraitOfHormuz #AmericanPower

Mark

421,367 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

In 1972, a Stanford psychologist gave 4-year-olds a choice. "One marshmallow now or wait 15 minutes and get two." Rich kid waits. Poor kid eats it immediately. For 50 years, psychologists said this proved poor kids lack self-control. Wrong. Poor kids learned that promises get broken. The second marshmallow isn't coming. Professor Jiang Xueqin spent 50 minutes explaining why the poor kids are the rational ones: The psychologist was named Walter Mischel. He put a marshmallow in front of 4-year-olds and said: "You can have it now, or wait and get two." He tracked them for decades. The kids who waited did better at everything. His conclusion: success means delayed gratification. Long-term planning. Self-control. So educators built curricula around it. Teach kids self-control, resilience, self-assessment. They'll succeed. It didn't work. "If you take a bad student and teach him self-control, resilience, and self-assessment, the student doesn't actually get better." The reason is simple: correlation does not equal causation. Successful people wake up at 4am. But waking up at 4am won't make you successful. If you're successful, you wake up early because you're motivated. If you're successful, you have self-control because your environment rewards it. The traits don't cause success. Success causes the traits. Here's what actually determines success: "We know for a fact that rich people are much more likely to succeed than poor people. School doesn't really matter. If your parents are rich, you'll be successful. If your parents are poor, you will not." The difference starts with parenting. A rich kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "You made a mistake. Don't worry about it. Let me explain why fire is dangerous. You could burn yourself. We'd have to go to the doctor." A poor kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "Don't you ever do that again or I'll beat the crap out of you." Same lesson. Completely different worldview. The rich kid learns: the world is safe. I am respected. Adults explain things to me. The poor kid learns: the world is scary. I must fear authority. Don't ask questions. There's another difference. Rich parents keep promises. Poor parents can't. "Next week we'll go to Thailand." Next week, you go to Thailand. "Next week we'll go to McDonald's." But the paycheck isn't enough. "Sorry, we can't go anymore." Rich parents offer stability. Poor parents can only offer volatility. Now go back to the marshmallow test. "If you believe the teacher will keep his promise, you won't eat that marshmallow. If you think the teacher is lying, you will eat it." If you're a poor kid, you've learned that promises get broken. Adults lie. The second marshmallow probably isn't coming. So you eat the first one. That's not lack of self-control. That's rational decision-making. "Poor kids are not stupid. Poor kids are rational. They're responding to the circumstances they live in." The same logic applies to resilience. "The idea of resilience is that you believe the world will help you. If you're rich and you fail, someone will help you get up. If you're poor and you fail, that probably tells you that you shouldn't be doing this." Why try again when trying again has never worked? And self-assessment? "If you're a poor child who lives under a lot of stress, it's hard to be self-reflective. Because if you look back at yourself, all you think about is your pain and your stress." Here's the deeper structure. "As a poor person, if you want to survive, you have to obey authority. As a rich person, you maximize your outcome by negotiating with others." Poor parents command their children because that's what the world will demand. Obey the police. Obey the boss. Don't talk back. Rich parents teach their children to debate, argue, negotiate. Because that's their game. "From day one, rich kids know they're playing a different game." Here's something stranger. 500 students took an IQ test. Then they guessed their ranking. The top 5% thought they were top 20%. The test was easy for them, so they assumed it was easy for everyone. The bottom 5% thought they were average. "People who are stupid lack the capacity to know they're stupid." This is the Dunning-Kruger effect. And it explains why the most confident people are often the least competent. "This helps explain why the world is why it is. Often the people in power are stupid. They don't know they're stupid. They were confident." Can poor kids escape? "Yes. But it means leaving your community. You have to be extremely individualistic. Very ambitious. High risk tolerance. Most people don't have that." The professor is one of them. "I'm a poor kid who succeeded. My father was a dishwasher. But I left Canada for the United States. I got lucky." "You can work as hard as you want, but the chances are against you. It takes luck. And that's often the exception to the rule, not the rule itself." Here's what he wants you to understand: When we see differences in success, our default explanation is differences in ability or effort. We forget that a poor kid eating the marshmallow isn't weak. He's learned that waiting doesn't pay. We forget that a poor kid giving up isn't lazy. He's learned that no one's coming to help. We refuse to admit that the traits we associate with success are products of environment, not causes of it. The marshmallow test is about measuring childhood, not measuring character.

In 1972, a Stanford psychologist gave 4-year-olds a choice. "One marshmallow now or wait 15 minutes and get two." Rich kid waits. Poor kid eats it immediately. For 50 years, psychologists said this proved poor kids lack self-control. Wrong. Poor kids learned that promises get broken. The second marshmallow isn't coming. Professor Jiang Xueqin spent 50 minutes explaining why the poor kids are the rational ones: The psychologist was named Walter Mischel. He put a marshmallow in front of 4-year-olds and said: "You can have it now, or wait and get two." He tracked them for decades. The kids who waited did better at everything. His conclusion: success means delayed gratification. Long-term planning. Self-control. So educators built curricula around it. Teach kids self-control, resilience, self-assessment. They'll succeed. It didn't work. "If you take a bad student and teach him self-control, resilience, and self-assessment, the student doesn't actually get better." The reason is simple: correlation does not equal causation. Successful people wake up at 4am. But waking up at 4am won't make you successful. If you're successful, you wake up early because you're motivated. If you're successful, you have self-control because your environment rewards it. The traits don't cause success. Success causes the traits. Here's what actually determines success: "We know for a fact that rich people are much more likely to succeed than poor people. School doesn't really matter. If your parents are rich, you'll be successful. If your parents are poor, you will not." The difference starts with parenting. A rich kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "You made a mistake. Don't worry about it. Let me explain why fire is dangerous. You could burn yourself. We'd have to go to the doctor." A poor kid touches a hot stove. The parent says: "Don't you ever do that again or I'll beat the crap out of you." Same lesson. Completely different worldview. The rich kid learns: the world is safe. I am respected. Adults explain things to me. The poor kid learns: the world is scary. I must fear authority. Don't ask questions. There's another difference. Rich parents keep promises. Poor parents can't. "Next week we'll go to Thailand." Next week, you go to Thailand. "Next week we'll go to McDonald's." But the paycheck isn't enough. "Sorry, we can't go anymore." Rich parents offer stability. Poor parents can only offer volatility. Now go back to the marshmallow test. "If you believe the teacher will keep his promise, you won't eat that marshmallow. If you think the teacher is lying, you will eat it." If you're a poor kid, you've learned that promises get broken. Adults lie. The second marshmallow probably isn't coming. So you eat the first one. That's not lack of self-control. That's rational decision-making. "Poor kids are not stupid. Poor kids are rational. They're responding to the circumstances they live in." The same logic applies to resilience. "The idea of resilience is that you believe the world will help you. If you're rich and you fail, someone will help you get up. If you're poor and you fail, that probably tells you that you shouldn't be doing this." Why try again when trying again has never worked? And self-assessment? "If you're a poor child who lives under a lot of stress, it's hard to be self-reflective. Because if you look back at yourself, all you think about is your pain and your stress." Here's the deeper structure. "As a poor person, if you want to survive, you have to obey authority. As a rich person, you maximize your outcome by negotiating with others." Poor parents command their children because that's what the world will demand. Obey the police. Obey the boss. Don't talk back. Rich parents teach their children to debate, argue, negotiate. Because that's their game. "From day one, rich kids know they're playing a different game." Here's something stranger. 500 students took an IQ test. Then they guessed their ranking. The top 5% thought they were top 20%. The test was easy for them, so they assumed it was easy for everyone. The bottom 5% thought they were average. "People who are stupid lack the capacity to know they're stupid." This is the Dunning-Kruger effect. And it explains why the most confident people are often the least competent. "This helps explain why the world is why it is. Often the people in power are stupid. They don't know they're stupid. They were confident." Can poor kids escape? "Yes. But it means leaving your community. You have to be extremely individualistic. Very ambitious. High risk tolerance. Most people don't have that." The professor is one of them. "I'm a poor kid who succeeded. My father was a dishwasher. But I left Canada for the United States. I got lucky." "You can work as hard as you want, but the chances are against you. It takes luck. And that's often the exception to the rule, not the rule itself." Here's what he wants you to understand: When we see differences in success, our default explanation is differences in ability or effort. We forget that a poor kid eating the marshmallow isn't weak. He's learned that waiting doesn't pay. We forget that a poor kid giving up isn't lazy. He's learned that no one's coming to help. We refuse to admit that the traits we associate with success are products of environment, not causes of it. The marshmallow test is about measuring childhood, not measuring character.

Jaynit

291,585 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇮🇳 Why the Su-57 is Still Alive (Despite the Rafale Deal) 🇷🇺 In January 2026, New Delhi moved decisively toward what has already been christened the “deal of the century.” The Defence Procurement Board cleared a proposal to buy 114 Rafale fighter jets, a $36 billion bet meant to reverse the Indian Air Force’s alarming slide in squadron strength. For many, that should have closed the book. The Rafale has performed in combat, the IAF trusts it, and the logistics and training ecosystem is already in place. Add a substantial Make in India component, and the choice looks not just sensible but inevitable. Betting big on Rafale addresses the IAF’s immediate crisis. Keeping Russia in the picture hedges against long‑term dependency on a single supplier, a single geopolitical axis, or a single vision of India’s future force structure. In other words, New Delhi is not choosing between France and Russia. It is choosing flexibility over certainty, leverage over loyalty, and survival over sentiment. The aircraft may dominate the headlines, but the real contest is over sovereignty, and that debate is far from settled. The “Invisible” Problem: The China Factor -->Rafale’s Strengths: a formidable, combat‑proven platformbut still a 4.5‑generation jet. -->The Threat is that China fields the J‑20, a bona fide 5th‑generation stealth fighter. -->The Reality is, in a face‑off, a Rafale may struggle to detect a J‑20 on radar in time to shoot first. -->The Gap India’s AMCA is roughly a decade away. Strategists see the Su‑57 as the only near‑term plug for an anti‑stealth hunter to counter China’s edge now. Buying the Jet vs. Owning the Code -->The core issue of sovereignty over software. This is the strongest case for the Russian option, which controls the jet’s “brain” and integration pipeline. -->France (Rafale) You get world‑class hardware and systems, but the mission software/source code remains French. -->Russia (Su‑57) Moscow is pitching full technology transfer, including source‑code access. That means India can natively integrate indigenous weapons, tailor mission systems, and exercise deeper control over production and upgrades. Industrial head start-A recent audit reportedly found HAL’s Nashik facility is ~50% ready to start building the type, thanks to shared tooling and processes with the Su‑30 line. The High–Low Mix: Mass and Edge Together Framed correctly, this isn’t Rafale or Su‑57, it’s Rafale and Su‑57, by design. The 114 Rafales would fly the vast majority of sorties, air policing, border patrols, and deep strikes, delivering availability, commonality, and proven effects. Layered above, a small Su‑57 cadre (e.g., 2-3 squadrons) would serve as “special forces of the sky” stalking stealth adversaries, opening corridors through integrated air defenses, and prosecuting high‑value targets under emissions control. Industrial Survival Airpower isn’t only about tails on the ramp, it’s about hands on the tools. With Su‑30MKI production ending at Nashik and AMCA still years from serial production, HAL faces a capability cliff. If no new program backfills the gap, lines go cold, certifications lapse, supplier networks atrophy, and the tacit knowledge of master technicians dissipates. Restarting later is slower, costlier, and riskier than keeping the line warm. India’s fighter choice isn’t a beauty contest between French finesse and Russian promises. It’s a three‑part- Strategy counters a stealth‑equipped rival now. Sovereignty owns the software, integration, and upgrade pathways; Survival keeps the industrial engine running until AMCA scales. Bet big on Rafales to restore squadron strength and sortie generation. Keep a limited Su‑57 door open to hedge the stealth deficit, secure code‑level control, and bridge HAL through the AMCA gap. That’s not indecision, it’s flexibility over fidelity. And flexibility, in airpower and statecraft alike, is what ultimately buys strategic autonomy. Col AJ🇮🇳 Colonel Mayank Chaubey Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran) TheGlobalDecoder Aadi Achint 🇮🇳 #India #Rafale #France #AMCA #russia #USA #Davos26 #Davos2026

🇮🇳 Why the Su-57 is Still Alive (Despite the Rafale Deal) 🇷🇺 In January 2026, New Delhi moved decisively toward what has already been christened the “deal of the century.” The Defence Procurement Board cleared a proposal to buy 114 Rafale fighter jets, a $36 billion bet meant to reverse the Indian Air Force’s alarming slide in squadron strength. For many, that should have closed the book. The Rafale has performed in combat, the IAF trusts it, and the logistics and training ecosystem is already in place. Add a substantial Make in India component, and the choice looks not just sensible but inevitable. Betting big on Rafale addresses the IAF’s immediate crisis. Keeping Russia in the picture hedges against long‑term dependency on a single supplier, a single geopolitical axis, or a single vision of India’s future force structure. In other words, New Delhi is not choosing between France and Russia. It is choosing flexibility over certainty, leverage over loyalty, and survival over sentiment. The aircraft may dominate the headlines, but the real contest is over sovereignty, and that debate is far from settled. The “Invisible” Problem: The China Factor -->Rafale’s Strengths: a formidable, combat‑proven platformbut still a 4.5‑generation jet. -->The Threat is that China fields the J‑20, a bona fide 5th‑generation stealth fighter. -->The Reality is, in a face‑off, a Rafale may struggle to detect a J‑20 on radar in time to shoot first. -->The Gap India’s AMCA is roughly a decade away. Strategists see the Su‑57 as the only near‑term plug for an anti‑stealth hunter to counter China’s edge now. Buying the Jet vs. Owning the Code -->The core issue of sovereignty over software. This is the strongest case for the Russian option, which controls the jet’s “brain” and integration pipeline. -->France (Rafale) You get world‑class hardware and systems, but the mission software/source code remains French. -->Russia (Su‑57) Moscow is pitching full technology transfer, including source‑code access. That means India can natively integrate indigenous weapons, tailor mission systems, and exercise deeper control over production and upgrades. Industrial head start-A recent audit reportedly found HAL’s Nashik facility is ~50% ready to start building the type, thanks to shared tooling and processes with the Su‑30 line. The High–Low Mix: Mass and Edge Together Framed correctly, this isn’t Rafale or Su‑57, it’s Rafale and Su‑57, by design. The 114 Rafales would fly the vast majority of sorties, air policing, border patrols, and deep strikes, delivering availability, commonality, and proven effects. Layered above, a small Su‑57 cadre (e.g., 2-3 squadrons) would serve as “special forces of the sky” stalking stealth adversaries, opening corridors through integrated air defenses, and prosecuting high‑value targets under emissions control. Industrial Survival Airpower isn’t only about tails on the ramp, it’s about hands on the tools. With Su‑30MKI production ending at Nashik and AMCA still years from serial production, HAL faces a capability cliff. If no new program backfills the gap, lines go cold, certifications lapse, supplier networks atrophy, and the tacit knowledge of master technicians dissipates. Restarting later is slower, costlier, and riskier than keeping the line warm. India’s fighter choice isn’t a beauty contest between French finesse and Russian promises. It’s a three‑part- Strategy counters a stealth‑equipped rival now. Sovereignty owns the software, integration, and upgrade pathways; Survival keeps the industrial engine running until AMCA scales. Bet big on Rafales to restore squadron strength and sortie generation. Keep a limited Su‑57 door open to hedge the stealth deficit, secure code‑level control, and bridge HAL through the AMCA gap. That’s not indecision, it’s flexibility over fidelity. And flexibility, in airpower and statecraft alike, is what ultimately buys strategic autonomy. Col AJ🇮🇳 Colonel Mayank Chaubey Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran) TheGlobalDecoder Aadi Achint 🇮🇳 #India #Rafale #France #AMCA #russia #USA #Davos26 #Davos2026

The Sacred Scroll

35,970 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 The GAGOP Nominating Committee just showed the worst of what’s wrong with this party. 🚨 Kandiss Taylor—yes, the same Kandiss Taylor who works in schools with children and is now running for Congress in GA-1—sat on the Nominating Committee while running for public office—and used her position to launch an absolutely unhinged personal attack during my interview. Kandiss told me I, “didn’t get spanked as a child!” Why? Because I refuse to fall in line. Because I don’t bow. Because I don’t play their games. Because I shine a light on the cult-like mob mentality infecting the leadership of the Georgia GOP. Because I won’t kiss the ring of Josh McKoon or the good ole boys little empire of manipulation. And the entire committee let her attack me! In fact, they all did for over 20 minutes. Let’s call it what it is: a coordinated culture of control. If you don’t obey? They’ll: 💥Block you from getting the delegate list 💥Try to keep you off the ballot 💥Slander you, spread lies and filth—then gaslight you that you’re the problem 💥And now? Suggest physical abuse as punishment As Steve Bannon says, “These are the desperate screams of a dying regime.” This culture has to change. Now. It’s time to rebuild the GAGOP into something stronger—an infrastructure that other states envy. A machine that actually works for the people, not the politicians. ✅No more Dominion machines. ✅No more fake “America First” phonies. ✅No more weak leadership obsessed with silencing truth-tellers. ✅ It’s time to stop pretending and start delivering on Trump’s America First agenda. ✅ It’s time to gear up for victory in 2026—and take the Senate back. It’s time to get serious. That starts now in 2025. About Trump. About paper ballots. About taking the Senate back in 2026. This is our moment to build something real! If you’re ready for that kind of change, I’m asking for your vote for Assistant Secretary of the Georgia Republican Party. Let’s build this party into something that actually fights for you.

🚨 The GAGOP Nominating Committee just showed the worst of what’s wrong with this party. 🚨 Kandiss Taylor—yes, the same Kandiss Taylor who works in schools with children and is now running for Congress in GA-1—sat on the Nominating Committee while running for public office—and used her position to launch an absolutely unhinged personal attack during my interview. Kandiss told me I, “didn’t get spanked as a child!” Why? Because I refuse to fall in line. Because I don’t bow. Because I don’t play their games. Because I shine a light on the cult-like mob mentality infecting the leadership of the Georgia GOP. Because I won’t kiss the ring of Josh McKoon or the good ole boys little empire of manipulation. And the entire committee let her attack me! In fact, they all did for over 20 minutes. Let’s call it what it is: a coordinated culture of control. If you don’t obey? They’ll: 💥Block you from getting the delegate list 💥Try to keep you off the ballot 💥Slander you, spread lies and filth—then gaslight you that you’re the problem 💥And now? Suggest physical abuse as punishment As Steve Bannon says, “These are the desperate screams of a dying regime.” This culture has to change. Now. It’s time to rebuild the GAGOP into something stronger—an infrastructure that other states envy. A machine that actually works for the people, not the politicians. ✅No more Dominion machines. ✅No more fake “America First” phonies. ✅No more weak leadership obsessed with silencing truth-tellers. ✅ It’s time to stop pretending and start delivering on Trump’s America First agenda. ✅ It’s time to gear up for victory in 2026—and take the Senate back. It’s time to get serious. That starts now in 2025. About Trump. About paper ballots. About taking the Senate back in 2026. This is our moment to build something real! If you’re ready for that kind of change, I’m asking for your vote for Assistant Secretary of the Georgia Republican Party. Let’s build this party into something that actually fights for you.

Kylie Jane Kremer

54,332 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

So the House Defendants’ Support YouTube Channel was back at it the other night and their latest masterpiece? Brian Higgins moved multiple vehicles at CPD, and the surveillance video proves it!” Reality check, Yes Higgins had multiple vehicles at the Canton Police Department. Yes, Higgins said he went to move two of them. But what does the actual surveillance footage show?Higgins moves ONE vehicle. And then? He removes a duffle bag from another vehicle. That's it. That is the list. No second vehicle being moved. No hidden stunt work. No Fast & Furious: Canton Drift. But according to the House Channel, that duffle bag must turn into a whole SUV when you squint hard enough. They’re not “analyzing.” They’re gaslighting, ladies and gentlemen. They also claimed that “It all happened at the exact time the plows came through!” Oh really? Funny, because when you watch the surveillance? ZERO plow trucks. Not one. Not even the reflection of a plow. Not even the shadow of a plow. Not even a toddler’s plastic plow from Fisher-Price. But hey,why let the absence of plows stop you from insisting that plows were there? Oh, and here’s the kicker, What they are pushing directly contradicts the sworn testimony of Officer Sean Goode. Goode testified that CPD vehicles are supposed to be parked along the outer edge of the lot so DPW plows can make a clean pass. Meaning, If plows had actually arrived, everybody in that lot would’ve been moved out of the way. The vehicles would’ve been repositioned. There would’ve been activity on camera. Instead? Nothing. Nada. A whole lot of No Plow, Big Wow. But the House Channel ladies? They just keep on insisting, because when the facts don’t fit the narrative, they simply… invent new facts. So next time the House Defendant Cheer Squad wants to tell us what the video shows… maybe they should try watching the video first, not daydreaming their way through it. Because out here in the real world, one vehicle moved, one duffle bag removed, and absolutely zero plows in sight. Gaslight much, ladies?” And let's not get into the 12 minutes of Goode and Higgins in the control room but never speaking to each other!

So the House Defendants’ Support YouTube Channel was back at it the other night and their latest masterpiece? Brian Higgins moved multiple vehicles at CPD, and the surveillance video proves it!” Reality check, Yes Higgins had multiple vehicles at the Canton Police Department. Yes, Higgins said he went to move two of them. But what does the actual surveillance footage show?Higgins moves ONE vehicle. And then? He removes a duffle bag from another vehicle. That's it. That is the list. No second vehicle being moved. No hidden stunt work. No Fast & Furious: Canton Drift. But according to the House Channel, that duffle bag must turn into a whole SUV when you squint hard enough. They’re not “analyzing.” They’re gaslighting, ladies and gentlemen. They also claimed that “It all happened at the exact time the plows came through!” Oh really? Funny, because when you watch the surveillance? ZERO plow trucks. Not one. Not even the reflection of a plow. Not even the shadow of a plow. Not even a toddler’s plastic plow from Fisher-Price. But hey,why let the absence of plows stop you from insisting that plows were there? Oh, and here’s the kicker, What they are pushing directly contradicts the sworn testimony of Officer Sean Goode. Goode testified that CPD vehicles are supposed to be parked along the outer edge of the lot so DPW plows can make a clean pass. Meaning, If plows had actually arrived, everybody in that lot would’ve been moved out of the way. The vehicles would’ve been repositioned. There would’ve been activity on camera. Instead? Nothing. Nada. A whole lot of No Plow, Big Wow. But the House Channel ladies? They just keep on insisting, because when the facts don’t fit the narrative, they simply… invent new facts. So next time the House Defendant Cheer Squad wants to tell us what the video shows… maybe they should try watching the video first, not daydreaming their way through it. Because out here in the real world, one vehicle moved, one duffle bag removed, and absolutely zero plows in sight. Gaslight much, ladies?” And let's not get into the 12 minutes of Goode and Higgins in the control room but never speaking to each other!

Dixie Normus

18,850 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Eric Schmidt was asked a technical question about open source and answered with the map of the next fifty years. The winner won’t be the smartest model. It’ll be the one four billion people never had to choose. Schmidt: “China is competing with open weights and open training data, and the US is largely and majority focused on closed weights, closed data.” That isn’t a product decision. It’s a distribution decision. And distribution has beaten quality in every contest that ever mattered. Schmidt: “The majority of the world, think of it as the Belt and Road initiative, are going to use Chinese models and not American models.” The first Belt and Road was ports, rail, and highways. This one doesn’t get poured. It gets downloaded. Every piece of infrastructure ever built was indifferent to what moved across it. A road doesn’t tell you where to go. A model does. Schmidt: “The American models are typically using 16-bit precision for their training. The Chinese are pushing 8 and now even 4.” Every bit they drop is a cheaper device that can run it. We cut off their chips to slow them down. Scarcity made their models small. Small is what crosses a border. We designed their advantage. Not better. Present. America is building the best model on earth and metering it. China is building one that’s good enough and giving it away. A model isn’t software. It’s a compressed set of judgments about what’s true, what’s askable, and what a reasonable answer sounds like. Install that as a country’s default and you haven’t sold them a tool. You’ve set the limits of what occurs to them. That isn’t censorship. Censorship leaves a mark. A question that never occurs to you doesn’t feel like a restriction. It feels like the edge of the world. Every empire before this one had to teach the world its language first. Missionaries, schoolteachers, garrisons, printing presses. Every one of them ran through a human being who could hesitate, doubt, or be talked out of it. AI arrives already speaking yours. It doesn’t ask you to change. It changes you in your own voice. The first ideology in history that doesn’t need believers. It only needs to be installed. Schmidt: “I’d much rather have the proliferation of large language models and that learning be done based on Western values.” He’s right, and we’re playing it backwards. We treat openness like a giveaway, as if the weights were the crown jewels. Openness is the one advantage an authoritarian can’t copy. An open model can be read, probed, and torn apart by anyone who doubts it. A system that has to control the answer can never afford to publish the reasoning. China opens its weights to spread them. America could open its weights to be trusted. Only one of those compounds. A closed American model wins the benchmark. An open American model wins the default. Centuries get built out of defaults. Schmidt: “We also have to watch to make sure that the proliferation of these models for handheld devices is under American control.” That’s the ground. Not data centers. Not cloud contracts. Pockets. The frontier race has five contenders and the whole world watching. This one has no audience at all. It plays out on hardware too cheap to run an American model, and goes to whoever bothered to show up. We keep asking who reaches AGI first. The question that settles the century is smaller and much harder to take back. Four billion people are going to ask a machine what happened in their own country. Whose answer do they get? Nobody votes on that. It’s decided by whatever was already installed. America has the best AI ever built. The only way to lose this era is to keep it.

Eric Schmidt was asked a technical question about open source and answered with the map of the next fifty years. The winner won’t be the smartest model. It’ll be the one four billion people never had to choose. Schmidt: “China is competing with open weights and open training data, and the US is largely and majority focused on closed weights, closed data.” That isn’t a product decision. It’s a distribution decision. And distribution has beaten quality in every contest that ever mattered. Schmidt: “The majority of the world, think of it as the Belt and Road initiative, are going to use Chinese models and not American models.” The first Belt and Road was ports, rail, and highways. This one doesn’t get poured. It gets downloaded. Every piece of infrastructure ever built was indifferent to what moved across it. A road doesn’t tell you where to go. A model does. Schmidt: “The American models are typically using 16-bit precision for their training. The Chinese are pushing 8 and now even 4.” Every bit they drop is a cheaper device that can run it. We cut off their chips to slow them down. Scarcity made their models small. Small is what crosses a border. We designed their advantage. Not better. Present. America is building the best model on earth and metering it. China is building one that’s good enough and giving it away. A model isn’t software. It’s a compressed set of judgments about what’s true, what’s askable, and what a reasonable answer sounds like. Install that as a country’s default and you haven’t sold them a tool. You’ve set the limits of what occurs to them. That isn’t censorship. Censorship leaves a mark. A question that never occurs to you doesn’t feel like a restriction. It feels like the edge of the world. Every empire before this one had to teach the world its language first. Missionaries, schoolteachers, garrisons, printing presses. Every one of them ran through a human being who could hesitate, doubt, or be talked out of it. AI arrives already speaking yours. It doesn’t ask you to change. It changes you in your own voice. The first ideology in history that doesn’t need believers. It only needs to be installed. Schmidt: “I’d much rather have the proliferation of large language models and that learning be done based on Western values.” He’s right, and we’re playing it backwards. We treat openness like a giveaway, as if the weights were the crown jewels. Openness is the one advantage an authoritarian can’t copy. An open model can be read, probed, and torn apart by anyone who doubts it. A system that has to control the answer can never afford to publish the reasoning. China opens its weights to spread them. America could open its weights to be trusted. Only one of those compounds. A closed American model wins the benchmark. An open American model wins the default. Centuries get built out of defaults. Schmidt: “We also have to watch to make sure that the proliferation of these models for handheld devices is under American control.” That’s the ground. Not data centers. Not cloud contracts. Pockets. The frontier race has five contenders and the whole world watching. This one has no audience at all. It plays out on hardware too cheap to run an American model, and goes to whoever bothered to show up. We keep asking who reaches AGI first. The question that settles the century is smaller and much harder to take back. Four billion people are going to ask a machine what happened in their own country. Whose answer do they get? Nobody votes on that. It’s decided by whatever was already installed. America has the best AI ever built. The only way to lose this era is to keep it.

Dustin

12,094 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Bill Blair’s Bill Blair career is a festering pile of incompetence, arrogance, and betrayal that has Canadians seething with justified anger. As Toronto Police Chief during the 2010 G20 summit in Toronto, he orchestrated a security nightmare that resulted in nearly 1,000 arrests, the largest mass arrest in Canadian history. His officers unleashed brutal force, kettled innocent protesters in the streets, and trampled civil rights, leaving a scar on the city that still stings. The aftermath was a humiliating $16.5 million settlement in August 2020, with those detained receiving between $5,000 and $24,700 each for the trauma inflicted under Blair’s command. Instead of taking responsibility, he dug in his heels, defending the draconian regulations that fueled the chaos and refusing to resign despite the public’s outrage and the undeniable evidence of his failure. His stint as Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness was no less infuriating. In June 2023, he botched a critical CSIS memo warning of threats from a Chinese diplomat targeting Conservative MP Michael Chong and his family. Blair had the audacity to pin the blame on CSIS Director David Vigneault, whining that the director deemed it unnecessary to inform him, as if that excuses his job to protect Canadians. A parliamentary committee investigation into foreign interference, coupled with a scathing report from former governor general David Johnston, laid bare the government’s pathetic handling of confidential intelligence under Blair’s watch. The public was left fuming, watching a minister too cowardly to admit his role in letting foreign threats slip through the cracks, exposing his utter uselessness in a role demanding vigilance and accountability. Then, as Minister of National Defence in 2024, Blair rammed through a plan to send banned firearms from Canada’s gun buyback program to Ukraine, igniting a firestorm of public disgust. With over 2,000 firearm models banned, including 324 “assault-style” additions in December 2024, and an amnesty order until October 2025, he decided to ship these weapons abroad, undermining the very safety measures Canadians were promised. The buyback’s cost, estimated at up to $750 million by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, already had taxpayers on edge, but Blair’s move to hand over these guns confirmed as suitable by Ukraine in October 2024 drove provinces like Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan to open revolt. Citizens saw it as a betrayal, their trust in domestic gun control shredded so Blair could play war hero, leaving them to foot the bill for his reckless priorities. His oversight of the RCMP was another gut punch to the public. In November 2020, Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard released a report that tore into the RCMP for failing transparency laws “by nearly every measure,” a collapse that happened squarely under Blair’s tenure as Public Safety Minister. Canadians were denied access to critical information, stuck with an agency cloaked in secrecy because Blair couldn’t be bothered to enforce basic accountability. Blair’s Ukraine aid efforts only deepened the resentment. In February 2024, he announced $60 million for F-16 supplies, followed by nearly $65 million in October 2024 for arms, ammunition, and drones, all part of Canada’s support for Ukraine against Russia’s 2022 invasion. While the cause might sound noble, Canadians were livid watching their money hemorrhage overseas while Blair ignored the domestic fallout of his policies. The gun donation plan tied into this, with businesses compensated for transferring banned weapons, adding insult to injury for a public already stretched thin. From the G20’s violent legacy to the CSIS memo disgrace, from the RCMP’s opacity to the gun control sellout, Blair’s every move has been a calculated insult, a refusal to face the tough questions, and a shameless evasion of the consequences that keep piling up.

Bill Blair’s Bill Blair career is a festering pile of incompetence, arrogance, and betrayal that has Canadians seething with justified anger. As Toronto Police Chief during the 2010 G20 summit in Toronto, he orchestrated a security nightmare that resulted in nearly 1,000 arrests, the largest mass arrest in Canadian history. His officers unleashed brutal force, kettled innocent protesters in the streets, and trampled civil rights, leaving a scar on the city that still stings. The aftermath was a humiliating $16.5 million settlement in August 2020, with those detained receiving between $5,000 and $24,700 each for the trauma inflicted under Blair’s command. Instead of taking responsibility, he dug in his heels, defending the draconian regulations that fueled the chaos and refusing to resign despite the public’s outrage and the undeniable evidence of his failure. His stint as Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness was no less infuriating. In June 2023, he botched a critical CSIS memo warning of threats from a Chinese diplomat targeting Conservative MP Michael Chong and his family. Blair had the audacity to pin the blame on CSIS Director David Vigneault, whining that the director deemed it unnecessary to inform him, as if that excuses his job to protect Canadians. A parliamentary committee investigation into foreign interference, coupled with a scathing report from former governor general David Johnston, laid bare the government’s pathetic handling of confidential intelligence under Blair’s watch. The public was left fuming, watching a minister too cowardly to admit his role in letting foreign threats slip through the cracks, exposing his utter uselessness in a role demanding vigilance and accountability. Then, as Minister of National Defence in 2024, Blair rammed through a plan to send banned firearms from Canada’s gun buyback program to Ukraine, igniting a firestorm of public disgust. With over 2,000 firearm models banned, including 324 “assault-style” additions in December 2024, and an amnesty order until October 2025, he decided to ship these weapons abroad, undermining the very safety measures Canadians were promised. The buyback’s cost, estimated at up to $750 million by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, already had taxpayers on edge, but Blair’s move to hand over these guns confirmed as suitable by Ukraine in October 2024 drove provinces like Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan to open revolt. Citizens saw it as a betrayal, their trust in domestic gun control shredded so Blair could play war hero, leaving them to foot the bill for his reckless priorities. His oversight of the RCMP was another gut punch to the public. In November 2020, Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard released a report that tore into the RCMP for failing transparency laws “by nearly every measure,” a collapse that happened squarely under Blair’s tenure as Public Safety Minister. Canadians were denied access to critical information, stuck with an agency cloaked in secrecy because Blair couldn’t be bothered to enforce basic accountability. Blair’s Ukraine aid efforts only deepened the resentment. In February 2024, he announced $60 million for F-16 supplies, followed by nearly $65 million in October 2024 for arms, ammunition, and drones, all part of Canada’s support for Ukraine against Russia’s 2022 invasion. While the cause might sound noble, Canadians were livid watching their money hemorrhage overseas while Blair ignored the domestic fallout of his policies. The gun donation plan tied into this, with businesses compensated for transferring banned weapons, adding insult to injury for a public already stretched thin. From the G20’s violent legacy to the CSIS memo disgrace, from the RCMP’s opacity to the gun control sellout, Blair’s every move has been a calculated insult, a refusal to face the tough questions, and a shameless evasion of the consequences that keep piling up.

Vote Canada

16,988 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Did Elon Musk & Trump Just EXPOSED the Federal Payroll SCAM? 🚨 The deadline just expired. Thousands of federal employees FAILED to respond to a simple request: list 5 things you did last week. Think about that. A job that YOUR tax dollars pay for—and they couldn’t even be bothered to reply. And the response from federal agencies? They told employees, "Don’t respond." 👉 Elon Musk called them out: "The request was utterly trivial. The standard was to type some words and press send. Yet, so many failed even THAT test, urged on by their own managers. Have you ever witnessed such incompetence and contempt for how your taxes are being spent?" 🔥 What’s REALLY going on? 🔥 President Donald J. Trump & Elon Musk are digging into something bigger than anyone imagined. The federal government’s payroll is a black hole. Who’s actually working? Where is the money going? Are there thousands of "ghost employees" getting paid for NOTHING? 💰 They’ve already uncovered $65 BILLION in waste But that’s just the start. Their goal? Cut $1 TRILLION in unnecessary spending. 🚨 Here’s why the deep state is panicking: 🚨 🔹 If these federal employees really exist, why can’t they answer a basic question? 🔹 If they’re working so hard, why do agencies REFUSE to cooperate? 🔹 If the system isn’t corrupt, why is there a cover-up? And get this: Musk & President Trump are giving them one last chance. Those who don’t respond AGAIN will be TERMINATED. 💥 Think about what this means. 💥 For YEARS, we've been told we "must fund" government agencies that are bloated, ineffective, and unaccountable. But the truth is finally coming out: ❌ We are funding a system that doesn’t even know who works for it. ❌ We are paying for people who might not even EXIST. ❌ We are watching bureaucrats REFUSE to justify their own jobs. And yet, these SAME agencies want to: ❗ Lecture YOU about "paying your fair share" ❗ Expand their power over YOUR life ❗ Keep demanding MORE money, MORE control, and ZERO accountability 🔥 THIS is why President Donald J. Trump is unlike anything we've ever seen in modern history. Like Douglas Murray said: "What Trump is doing is UNLIKE anything we have ever seen. He is challenging a system that was never meant to be challenged." And now, with Elon Musk exposing the rot from within, the entire deep state is on edge. 💥 The question is: WILL AMERICANS FINALLY DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY? Do you think Musk & President Trump are right to clean house? Should these federal workers be FIRED if they can’t justify their jobs? Drop your thoughts below! 👇🔥

🚨 Did Elon Musk & Trump Just EXPOSED the Federal Payroll SCAM? 🚨 The deadline just expired. Thousands of federal employees FAILED to respond to a simple request: list 5 things you did last week. Think about that. A job that YOUR tax dollars pay for—and they couldn’t even be bothered to reply. And the response from federal agencies? They told employees, "Don’t respond." 👉 Elon Musk called them out: "The request was utterly trivial. The standard was to type some words and press send. Yet, so many failed even THAT test, urged on by their own managers. Have you ever witnessed such incompetence and contempt for how your taxes are being spent?" 🔥 What’s REALLY going on? 🔥 President Donald J. Trump & Elon Musk are digging into something bigger than anyone imagined. The federal government’s payroll is a black hole. Who’s actually working? Where is the money going? Are there thousands of "ghost employees" getting paid for NOTHING? 💰 They’ve already uncovered $65 BILLION in waste But that’s just the start. Their goal? Cut $1 TRILLION in unnecessary spending. 🚨 Here’s why the deep state is panicking: 🚨 🔹 If these federal employees really exist, why can’t they answer a basic question? 🔹 If they’re working so hard, why do agencies REFUSE to cooperate? 🔹 If the system isn’t corrupt, why is there a cover-up? And get this: Musk & President Trump are giving them one last chance. Those who don’t respond AGAIN will be TERMINATED. 💥 Think about what this means. 💥 For YEARS, we've been told we "must fund" government agencies that are bloated, ineffective, and unaccountable. But the truth is finally coming out: ❌ We are funding a system that doesn’t even know who works for it. ❌ We are paying for people who might not even EXIST. ❌ We are watching bureaucrats REFUSE to justify their own jobs. And yet, these SAME agencies want to: ❗ Lecture YOU about "paying your fair share" ❗ Expand their power over YOUR life ❗ Keep demanding MORE money, MORE control, and ZERO accountability 🔥 THIS is why President Donald J. Trump is unlike anything we've ever seen in modern history. Like Douglas Murray said: "What Trump is doing is UNLIKE anything we have ever seen. He is challenging a system that was never meant to be challenged." And now, with Elon Musk exposing the rot from within, the entire deep state is on edge. 💥 The question is: WILL AMERICANS FINALLY DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY? Do you think Musk & President Trump are right to clean house? Should these federal workers be FIRED if they can’t justify their jobs? Drop your thoughts below! 👇🔥

Francois Leclerc

590,482 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"India will be invited to join US-led initiative Pax Silica as 'full member' next month"- US embassador Sergio Gor Trying to act smart, Trump? But Bharat under PM .Narendra Modi Ji can see through this 'noble gesture'! Why's US Pushing Bharat into Pax Silica: It's All About American Interests, Not Altruism. Let's cut through diplomatic fluff. US inviting Bharat to join Pax Silica—a coalition for securing supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, AI & advanced tech—isn't some benevolent gesture. America doesn't do global alliances without hefty dose of self-interest. Here's real playbook on why Uncle Sam wants us in & crucially, how Bharat must play smart to avoid getting trapped in one-sided deal. 👉US Motives- Securing Dominance, Countering China & Tapping Bharat's Assets 1. Countering China's Monopoly: China controls 90% of global rare earth processing & massive chunk of semiconductor supply chains. Pax Silica is Washington's answer to "de-risk" from Beijing—building a "trusted" network of allies to reroute critical tech flows. Bharat, with world's 3rd-largest rare earth reserves (6.9 million tonnes, mostly in coastal monazite sands), is prime target. US wants access to our raw materials to feed their refineries & fabs, reducing reliance on China without lifting a finger on their own soil. 2. Geopolitical Leverage in Indo-Pacific: Pax Silica pulls Bharat deeper into US orbit as a "strategic counterweight" to China. It's about encircling Beijing economically—Japan, South Korea, UK, Israel are already in; adding Bharat's scale (population, market, geography) makes it powerhouse bloc. Trump-era reciprocity means fair trade on paper, but in reality, it's about locking in allies for tech war. 3. Economic Goldmine-Talent, Market & Cheap Resources: Bharat's engineering prowess, booming digital economy & manufacturing push (via PLI schemes) are irresistible. US sees us as a diversification hub—away from Taiwan's risks—for chips & AI. But dig deeper: Raw rare earths sell for $3,000/tonne, while processed magnets (which we'd import back) go for $25000/tonne. Joining gives US firms access to our resources, talent & $3T+ market, boosting their profits while we play supplier. 4. Tech Sovereignty for US, Not World: This's about controlling "operating system of modern power"—silicon, AI, data centers. By inviting Bharat early, US ensures standards, export controls & investments align with American rules, preventing a multipolar tech world where Bharat could pivot to alternatives. 🔥In short, Pax Silica is economic statecraft: Prosperity for US bloc, dependency for others. It's not charity; it's strategy. 👉How Bharat Must Not Fall into the Trap? JOIN, BUT ON OUR TERMS. Bharat should absolutely join—access to tech, R&D & global chains is a win for our semiconductor ambitions (we're already at <1% global production despite reserves). But NOT Blindly. Here's what Modi Sarkar will demand even as members: —Demand Tech Transfer & Build Domestic Muscle: No deal without enforceable clauses for refining tech & joint fabs in India. —Invest heavily in our own processing plants (e.g., expand IREL's capabilities) to avoid exporting cheap ore & importing pricey chips. –Push for co-ownership in AI/logistics standards—don't let US/Japan hog high-value end. —Maintain Strategic Autonomy by Diversifying Alliances. Will Keep balancing with China (via BRICS/SCO), Russia & EU. Bharat won't burn bridges; but will use Pax Silica to negotiate better terms elsewhere. —Safeguard Data, IP & Sovereignty: Enforce strict data localization in AI deals. Protect our startups from IP theft or forced partnerships. Monitor investments via CFIUS-like screening to block backdoor control. —Focus on Long-Term Resilience: Ramp up R&D funding (aim for 2% GDP), skill 1M+ engineers in semis/AI, & integrate with Quad/iCET for broader gains. IF AMERICA AGREES TO THIS, PAX SILICA IS WELCOME. OR ELSE....THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU!

"India will be invited to join US-led initiative Pax Silica as 'full member' next month"- US embassador Sergio Gor Trying to act smart, Trump? But Bharat under PM .Narendra Modi Ji can see through this 'noble gesture'! Why's US Pushing Bharat into Pax Silica: It's All About American Interests, Not Altruism. Let's cut through diplomatic fluff. US inviting Bharat to join Pax Silica—a coalition for securing supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, AI & advanced tech—isn't some benevolent gesture. America doesn't do global alliances without hefty dose of self-interest. Here's real playbook on why Uncle Sam wants us in & crucially, how Bharat must play smart to avoid getting trapped in one-sided deal. 👉US Motives- Securing Dominance, Countering China & Tapping Bharat's Assets 1. Countering China's Monopoly: China controls 90% of global rare earth processing & massive chunk of semiconductor supply chains. Pax Silica is Washington's answer to "de-risk" from Beijing—building a "trusted" network of allies to reroute critical tech flows. Bharat, with world's 3rd-largest rare earth reserves (6.9 million tonnes, mostly in coastal monazite sands), is prime target. US wants access to our raw materials to feed their refineries & fabs, reducing reliance on China without lifting a finger on their own soil. 2. Geopolitical Leverage in Indo-Pacific: Pax Silica pulls Bharat deeper into US orbit as a "strategic counterweight" to China. It's about encircling Beijing economically—Japan, South Korea, UK, Israel are already in; adding Bharat's scale (population, market, geography) makes it powerhouse bloc. Trump-era reciprocity means fair trade on paper, but in reality, it's about locking in allies for tech war. 3. Economic Goldmine-Talent, Market & Cheap Resources: Bharat's engineering prowess, booming digital economy & manufacturing push (via PLI schemes) are irresistible. US sees us as a diversification hub—away from Taiwan's risks—for chips & AI. But dig deeper: Raw rare earths sell for $3,000/tonne, while processed magnets (which we'd import back) go for $25000/tonne. Joining gives US firms access to our resources, talent & $3T+ market, boosting their profits while we play supplier. 4. Tech Sovereignty for US, Not World: This's about controlling "operating system of modern power"—silicon, AI, data centers. By inviting Bharat early, US ensures standards, export controls & investments align with American rules, preventing a multipolar tech world where Bharat could pivot to alternatives. 🔥In short, Pax Silica is economic statecraft: Prosperity for US bloc, dependency for others. It's not charity; it's strategy. 👉How Bharat Must Not Fall into the Trap? JOIN, BUT ON OUR TERMS. Bharat should absolutely join—access to tech, R&D & global chains is a win for our semiconductor ambitions (we're already at <1% global production despite reserves). But NOT Blindly. Here's what Modi Sarkar will demand even as members: —Demand Tech Transfer & Build Domestic Muscle: No deal without enforceable clauses for refining tech & joint fabs in India. —Invest heavily in our own processing plants (e.g., expand IREL's capabilities) to avoid exporting cheap ore & importing pricey chips. –Push for co-ownership in AI/logistics standards—don't let US/Japan hog high-value end. —Maintain Strategic Autonomy by Diversifying Alliances. Will Keep balancing with China (via BRICS/SCO), Russia & EU. Bharat won't burn bridges; but will use Pax Silica to negotiate better terms elsewhere. —Safeguard Data, IP & Sovereignty: Enforce strict data localization in AI deals. Protect our startups from IP theft or forced partnerships. Monitor investments via CFIUS-like screening to block backdoor control. —Focus on Long-Term Resilience: Ramp up R&D funding (aim for 2% GDP), skill 1M+ engineers in semis/AI, & integrate with Quad/iCET for broader gains. IF AMERICA AGREES TO THIS, PAX SILICA IS WELCOME. OR ELSE....THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU!

BhikuMhatre

60,782 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

To my supporters, friends, and every voter who has backed me since 2020: thank you. When I launched this race, NJ-09 was written off. It was a D+16 district, and Republicans treated it like a permanent loss. I didn’t. Since 2020, we have built something real. In 2022, I earned 41% against an entrenched incumbent and broke records. In 2024, we delivered the strongest Republican performance this district has seen in decades, falling just 3 points short of flipping NJ-09. That did not happen because of consultants, county bosses, or backroom deals. It happened because regular people believed in a message, a vision, and a movement, and they put their names, time, and reputations behind it. Over these past six years, I’ve seen the best of this district and the worst. I’ve taken hits from Democrats, and I’ve also faced resistance from inside my own party. I’ve dealt with political games, unnecessary obstacles, and people who smiled in public and worked against me in private. That is the truth. I have always been accountable to the voters, not to a political class. I cannot be bought, I cannot be controlled, and I will not bend the knee just to be accepted in rooms that do not represent the people. Here is the bottom line. I am suspending my campaign for Congress in 2026. This decision is not about fear. It is not about fundraising. It is not about my ability to compete. I’ve run three cycles on a shoestring budget and delivered historic gains every time. I know exactly what I’m capable of. This decision is about a deeper problem inside the party in New Jersey. Too many leaders have reduced winning elections to spreadsheets and stereotypes. They obsess over demographics and checkboxes while ignoring what actually wins. Ground game. Message discipline. Courage. Charisma. Strategy. A candidate whom people trust. They think they can harvest the momentum we built, parachute in a preferred candidate, and tell the voters to fall in line. NJ-09 voters are too smart for that. I’ve watched party insiders overlook proven results, and I’ve watched them reward connections over performance. I’ve watched them cling to “safe” choices while ignoring what the voters have already said with their ballots. And I’ve watched them pretend to support the movement in public while quietly trying to control or contain it behind the scenes. So I’m giving the party what it seems to want. A race without me in it. And if the same people keep making the same decisions the same way, the results in 2026 will look exactly how you think they will. But let me be clear. This is the end of Billy Prempeh 2026. It is not the end of the movement we started. I’m proud of what we built together. I’m proud that we proved this district is not unwinnable. I’m proud that we forced people to take NJ-09 seriously for the first time in a long time. I’m proud that we stood up for New Jersey when people felt unheard, including during the lockdown era, when leadership mattered more than polished suits and scripted talking points. To every volunteer, donor, voter, and supporter: you made history with me. I’m grateful, and I’m not disappearing. I’m stepping back from this race, not stepping away from the mission.

To my supporters, friends, and every voter who has backed me since 2020: thank you. When I launched this race, NJ-09 was written off. It was a D+16 district, and Republicans treated it like a permanent loss. I didn’t. Since 2020, we have built something real. In 2022, I earned 41% against an entrenched incumbent and broke records. In 2024, we delivered the strongest Republican performance this district has seen in decades, falling just 3 points short of flipping NJ-09. That did not happen because of consultants, county bosses, or backroom deals. It happened because regular people believed in a message, a vision, and a movement, and they put their names, time, and reputations behind it. Over these past six years, I’ve seen the best of this district and the worst. I’ve taken hits from Democrats, and I’ve also faced resistance from inside my own party. I’ve dealt with political games, unnecessary obstacles, and people who smiled in public and worked against me in private. That is the truth. I have always been accountable to the voters, not to a political class. I cannot be bought, I cannot be controlled, and I will not bend the knee just to be accepted in rooms that do not represent the people. Here is the bottom line. I am suspending my campaign for Congress in 2026. This decision is not about fear. It is not about fundraising. It is not about my ability to compete. I’ve run three cycles on a shoestring budget and delivered historic gains every time. I know exactly what I’m capable of. This decision is about a deeper problem inside the party in New Jersey. Too many leaders have reduced winning elections to spreadsheets and stereotypes. They obsess over demographics and checkboxes while ignoring what actually wins. Ground game. Message discipline. Courage. Charisma. Strategy. A candidate whom people trust. They think they can harvest the momentum we built, parachute in a preferred candidate, and tell the voters to fall in line. NJ-09 voters are too smart for that. I’ve watched party insiders overlook proven results, and I’ve watched them reward connections over performance. I’ve watched them cling to “safe” choices while ignoring what the voters have already said with their ballots. And I’ve watched them pretend to support the movement in public while quietly trying to control or contain it behind the scenes. So I’m giving the party what it seems to want. A race without me in it. And if the same people keep making the same decisions the same way, the results in 2026 will look exactly how you think they will. But let me be clear. This is the end of Billy Prempeh 2026. It is not the end of the movement we started. I’m proud of what we built together. I’m proud that we proved this district is not unwinnable. I’m proud that we forced people to take NJ-09 seriously for the first time in a long time. I’m proud that we stood up for New Jersey when people felt unheard, including during the lockdown era, when leadership mattered more than polished suits and scripted talking points. To every volunteer, donor, voter, and supporter: you made history with me. I’m grateful, and I’m not disappearing. I’m stepping back from this race, not stepping away from the mission.

Billy Prempeh

36,265 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"Very often what happens is that the architects die, and they leave a zombie. We seem to be in a zombie era." The whole time I was watching the discussion between Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis, I felt like there was some darker thing lurking beneath the surface that connects the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics as a scientific discipline, the extreme secrecy surrounding the alleged UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program and the lack of any theoretical physicists working the problem, and the government's stated intention to control (per Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) the future of AI -- a future where there's no point investing in AI startups because “we [the government] are going to make sure that AI is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no startups.” And there's the other part Andreessen recounted from his White House meeting. He was told by the [Biden] administration that "During the Cold War, we [the federal government] classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community — entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed. If we decide we need to [for AI/math], we're going to do the same thing." Take a minute and think about that, because it's actually chilling. A clear precedent has been cited here -- one none of us knew about before Andreessen brought it to our attention -- and it raises two big questions: 1) Why? 2) HOW? Weinstein returns multiple times in this episode to the diminishingly small number of people who have the capacity to operate at the highest levels of physics and math. And whenever you have a small number of people who act as the natural gating function for something incredibly powerful, it's not a leap to imagine an additional layer of control being placed on them by pressure from outside. Whether that's through legal threats like "born secret," NDAs, direct threats of physical harm, money, regulation, etc., there are ways to lock down the gatekeepers so that they never do the thing -- at least not in public -- that the most powerful people in the world don't want them to do. Weinstein kept saying, about both the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics and the lack of physicists working the UAP problem, "this makes no sense." But it does make sense if you shift the frame to, "they don't want us to find the answers and are actively trying to stop us." The feeling I kept getting as I watched this fascinating discussion was that the legacy crash retrieval program used to have a lot more direct oversight and funding decades ago, but that the compartmentalization and secrecy around it turned it into more and more of an oxbow lake, and that as it got cut off from the conventional scientific community and defense establishment, it became more secretive, less well-funded, and less coordinated. So it kind of became its own siloed-off thing that fewer and fewer people knew about, but the people who did still know protected the territory fiercely. And then came the era of AAWSAP and AATIP and UAPTF, and without the deep, secret, institutional knowledge held by members of the legacy program, they tried to piece together what had happened in the past while not being able to penetrate the sort of firewall that existed partially because of controlled secrecy, and partially because of the firewalling effect of time. They were doing a lot of cold case file work, while running into the deepest of deep state secrecy efforts. That secrecy, at least based on my reading of the situation, was instituted decades ago, when the atomic-era scientific community (mostly the same group of geniuses that were at the top of the Manhattan Project) got together and -- probably at the behest of of the US government -- decided physics was becoming too dangerous if it continued down the path that it was on. So, as my spitball theory goes, they intentionally beached the entire enterprise on the shoals of string theory and quantized gravity and all the stuff Weinstein talks about everywhere he goes -- the "dogs that won't hunt" that are also "the only game in town." The very theories that have, in the real world, run physics aground. So let's come back to Andreessen's point here: they classified entire branches of physics and took them out of the research community, while real physics went off on a wild goose chase that has yielded precious few demonstrable results in the past half century or so. The effect is that the physics community has been off the scent for so long that anyone old enough to have held the knowledge that was shoved back into Pandora's proverbial box through extreme secrecy measures is now dead. And their taking of that knowledge to the grave may well be a critical part of the secrecy effort. Dead physicists tell no tales. I have this eerie sense that we scared ourselves shitless with certain discoveries (likely knowledge that followed from nuclear physics, which is itself still highly protected and curtailed) and decided that the only way to stop our headlong rush into world-ending catastrophe was to literally bury the knowledge and wait until everyone who had it died off. The government looks, at least to me, to have cauterized a destructive branch in the scientific timeline like they were the Time Variance Authority from Marvel comics. 80 years of claimed zero-progress in reverse-engineering alleged crashed or recovered UAPs. 40+ years of dead-ended physics. Only two or three major AI companies, one of which is now in a fight to the death with the Department of War. And the rumors that AI has "plateaued" or even "dead-ended" in its progress that keep springing up has potential echoes in the AI world of physics being diverted into String Theory. I'm not a mathematician or a physicist. I can't examine all the deeper particulars because I have neither the knowledge or the training. I only have surface level pattern recognition, and that tells me it all feels connected. The problem for the gatekeepers is that you can't bury knowledge that has been discovered once indefinitely. It's certain that all of this will be figured out again. And as Weinstein pointed out about a couple of non-physicists who figured out how to piece together nuclear weapons based on declassified information and publicly available knowledge, it IS happening. But it seems that at least on the individual basis, those green shoots are being pruned. Weinstein asks why none of the people who funded his education are "interested" in his Grand Unifying Theory. Weinstein is too well-known and too well-respected to just be taken out of play. They can't buy him off. They can't make him disappear without drawing more attention. So maybe they just hope that Geometric Unity will die on its own. Maybe they are behind the attacks on GU as something totally unserious. Maybe they have found a way to make other members of the physics community willing to look away. So, my question about this larger hypothetical operation to stop dangerous science and math is this: was it really just a massive kicking of the can down the road. Did they hoped it would buy us time? And if so, to what end? What are they waiting for? Can this game really be played forever? Maybe they think it can. Maybe they have an ongoing directive to keep suppressing this knowledge for as long as possible, and perhaps there's some secret core group whose job is to be the perpetual gatekeepers of potentially civilization-ending secrets. Maybe the Epstein connection to all of this was precisely because he was part of the operation to discover who was doing forbidden work and assess their progress. Maybe that's why, when he met Weinstein, he knew so much about GU. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but as a theory, it does have some real explanatory power. I find myself thinking of the fictional Brothers of the Cruciform Sword in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- a small, ancient, secret society whose job it was to keep tabs on people looking for the Holy Grail and stop them, so it doesn't fall into the wrong hands. Are we following the same track here? Could this, as crazy as it sounds, be the missing connective tissue in this mystery?

"Very often what happens is that the architects die, and they leave a zombie. We seem to be in a zombie era." The whole time I was watching the discussion between Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis, I felt like there was some darker thing lurking beneath the surface that connects the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics as a scientific discipline, the extreme secrecy surrounding the alleged UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program and the lack of any theoretical physicists working the problem, and the government's stated intention to control (per Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) the future of AI -- a future where there's no point investing in AI startups because “we [the government] are going to make sure that AI is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no startups.” And there's the other part Andreessen recounted from his White House meeting. He was told by the [Biden] administration that "During the Cold War, we [the federal government] classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community — entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed. If we decide we need to [for AI/math], we're going to do the same thing." Take a minute and think about that, because it's actually chilling. A clear precedent has been cited here -- one none of us knew about before Andreessen brought it to our attention -- and it raises two big questions: 1) Why? 2) HOW? Weinstein returns multiple times in this episode to the diminishingly small number of people who have the capacity to operate at the highest levels of physics and math. And whenever you have a small number of people who act as the natural gating function for something incredibly powerful, it's not a leap to imagine an additional layer of control being placed on them by pressure from outside. Whether that's through legal threats like "born secret," NDAs, direct threats of physical harm, money, regulation, etc., there are ways to lock down the gatekeepers so that they never do the thing -- at least not in public -- that the most powerful people in the world don't want them to do. Weinstein kept saying, about both the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics and the lack of physicists working the UAP problem, "this makes no sense." But it does make sense if you shift the frame to, "they don't want us to find the answers and are actively trying to stop us." The feeling I kept getting as I watched this fascinating discussion was that the legacy crash retrieval program used to have a lot more direct oversight and funding decades ago, but that the compartmentalization and secrecy around it turned it into more and more of an oxbow lake, and that as it got cut off from the conventional scientific community and defense establishment, it became more secretive, less well-funded, and less coordinated. So it kind of became its own siloed-off thing that fewer and fewer people knew about, but the people who did still know protected the territory fiercely. And then came the era of AAWSAP and AATIP and UAPTF, and without the deep, secret, institutional knowledge held by members of the legacy program, they tried to piece together what had happened in the past while not being able to penetrate the sort of firewall that existed partially because of controlled secrecy, and partially because of the firewalling effect of time. They were doing a lot of cold case file work, while running into the deepest of deep state secrecy efforts. That secrecy, at least based on my reading of the situation, was instituted decades ago, when the atomic-era scientific community (mostly the same group of geniuses that were at the top of the Manhattan Project) got together and -- probably at the behest of of the US government -- decided physics was becoming too dangerous if it continued down the path that it was on. So, as my spitball theory goes, they intentionally beached the entire enterprise on the shoals of string theory and quantized gravity and all the stuff Weinstein talks about everywhere he goes -- the "dogs that won't hunt" that are also "the only game in town." The very theories that have, in the real world, run physics aground. So let's come back to Andreessen's point here: they classified entire branches of physics and took them out of the research community, while real physics went off on a wild goose chase that has yielded precious few demonstrable results in the past half century or so. The effect is that the physics community has been off the scent for so long that anyone old enough to have held the knowledge that was shoved back into Pandora's proverbial box through extreme secrecy measures is now dead. And their taking of that knowledge to the grave may well be a critical part of the secrecy effort. Dead physicists tell no tales. I have this eerie sense that we scared ourselves shitless with certain discoveries (likely knowledge that followed from nuclear physics, which is itself still highly protected and curtailed) and decided that the only way to stop our headlong rush into world-ending catastrophe was to literally bury the knowledge and wait until everyone who had it died off. The government looks, at least to me, to have cauterized a destructive branch in the scientific timeline like they were the Time Variance Authority from Marvel comics. 80 years of claimed zero-progress in reverse-engineering alleged crashed or recovered UAPs. 40+ years of dead-ended physics. Only two or three major AI companies, one of which is now in a fight to the death with the Department of War. And the rumors that AI has "plateaued" or even "dead-ended" in its progress that keep springing up has potential echoes in the AI world of physics being diverted into String Theory. I'm not a mathematician or a physicist. I can't examine all the deeper particulars because I have neither the knowledge or the training. I only have surface level pattern recognition, and that tells me it all feels connected. The problem for the gatekeepers is that you can't bury knowledge that has been discovered once indefinitely. It's certain that all of this will be figured out again. And as Weinstein pointed out about a couple of non-physicists who figured out how to piece together nuclear weapons based on declassified information and publicly available knowledge, it IS happening. But it seems that at least on the individual basis, those green shoots are being pruned. Weinstein asks why none of the people who funded his education are "interested" in his Grand Unifying Theory. Weinstein is too well-known and too well-respected to just be taken out of play. They can't buy him off. They can't make him disappear without drawing more attention. So maybe they just hope that Geometric Unity will die on its own. Maybe they are behind the attacks on GU as something totally unserious. Maybe they have found a way to make other members of the physics community willing to look away. So, my question about this larger hypothetical operation to stop dangerous science and math is this: was it really just a massive kicking of the can down the road. Did they hoped it would buy us time? And if so, to what end? What are they waiting for? Can this game really be played forever? Maybe they think it can. Maybe they have an ongoing directive to keep suppressing this knowledge for as long as possible, and perhaps there's some secret core group whose job is to be the perpetual gatekeepers of potentially civilization-ending secrets. Maybe the Epstein connection to all of this was precisely because he was part of the operation to discover who was doing forbidden work and assess their progress. Maybe that's why, when he met Weinstein, he knew so much about GU. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but as a theory, it does have some real explanatory power. I find myself thinking of the fictional Brothers of the Cruciform Sword in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- a small, ancient, secret society whose job it was to keep tabs on people looking for the Holy Grail and stop them, so it doesn't fall into the wrong hands. Are we following the same track here? Could this, as crazy as it sounds, be the missing connective tissue in this mystery?

Steve Skojec

13,976 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Tradingview Source Code Hack: How Claude Code Actually Makes You Profitable building a trading bot in 2026 is less about being a genius coder and more about having the guts to stop letting your emotions drive your portfolio into a ditch. i spent years thinking that code was some secret language for the elite while i was busy getting liquidated on trades that should have been easy wins. the truth is that the simplest piece of automation can be the difference between a blown account and a system that actually grows while you sleep most traders are stuck in a loop of staring at charts until their eyes bleed and then making a panic decision at the worst possible moment. i used to be that guy who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on developers because i thought i was too far behind to learn it myself. the moment i realized that code is the great equalizer was the moment i stopped being a victim of market makers who can see every single move i make the hardest part of trading is the transition from manual clicking to full automation and that is where most people quit because they think it is an all or nothing game. you do not need a bot that does everything on day one but you do need a way to stop yourself from over trading and hitting the market button like a slot machine. imagine if you could just tell a script to enter a position for you slowly over time so you never have to worry about catching a falling knife ever again the secret weapon in this 2026 landscape is something i call the easy bot which is basically a remote control for your trading discipline. most people use too much leverage and never take profits because their brain tells them it will go higher right before the dump hits. by using a chunking entry system you can tell your bot to buy a position piece by piece which averages your entry and keeps your heart rate low most traders do not realize that exchanges and market makers can see your stop loss sitting right there on the order book like a giant target. if you are tired of getting stopped out only to see the price immediately reverse in your direction then you need to understand the power of a ghost stop loss. a ghost stop loss lives in your code and not on the exchange so the market makers have no idea where your pain point is until the bot actually sends the close order this invisible protection is a game changer for anyone trading on high volatility chains like solana or hyperliquid where the wick hunting is relentless. i learned this the hard way after watching my manual trades get hunted over and over while my automated systems stayed perfectly safe in the shadows. once you have a bot monitoring your positions for you the stress of a potential liquidation basically vanishes because the machine does not hesitate when it is time to exit the real fun begins when you start thinking like a market maker instead of a gambler who is just hoping for a moon shot. instead of guessing where the top is you can set up a simple logic loop that says buy under this price and sell over that price all day long. this allows you to capture the sideways chop that normally drains a manual trader through fees and bad entries while you are out at the beach or focusing on your business breakout trading is another area where manual traders lose their edge because they are either too slow to react or they enter way too late on a fake out. a simple script can sit there and monitor price action 24/7 with more patience than any human being could ever dream of having. when the breakout actually happens the bot triggers the entry in milliseconds while you are still trying to unlock your phone and open the exchange app i started learning to code live on youtube because i wanted to prove that anyone can do this if they are willing to iterate to success. it is not about getting it perfect on the first try but about building the foundation with functions that get the position and check the token price. every single bot i run today is just a combination of these basic building blocks that i have refined over the last five years of building in public if you are still trading by hand you are essentially bringing a knife to a gunfight in a market that is increasingly dominated by ai and high frequency systems. my goal with the road map and the open source code is to give you the same tools the big players have without you having to spend a fortune on devs. code allows you to backtest your ideas against historical data so you can see if your strategy actually works before you risk a single dollar of your hard earned capital the journey from a hand trader to a pseudo automated trader is the most important step you will ever take for your financial freedom. as you start to automate your entries and exits you will notice that your life gets better because the machine handles the boredom and the stress. eventually you will find that you are no longer chasing the market but instead you are letting your systems do the work while you live your life the way you want to i believe that the era of the manual retail trader is coming to an end but the era of the retail coder is just getting started. through the pain of my own liquidations i found the path to automation and i am never going back to the old way of doing things. keep building and keep iterating because the great equalizer is right there in the terminal waiting for you to take control of your future

The Tradingview Source Code Hack: How Claude Code Actually Makes You Profitable building a trading bot in 2026 is less about being a genius coder and more about having the guts to stop letting your emotions drive your portfolio into a ditch. i spent years thinking that code was some secret language for the elite while i was busy getting liquidated on trades that should have been easy wins. the truth is that the simplest piece of automation can be the difference between a blown account and a system that actually grows while you sleep most traders are stuck in a loop of staring at charts until their eyes bleed and then making a panic decision at the worst possible moment. i used to be that guy who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on developers because i thought i was too far behind to learn it myself. the moment i realized that code is the great equalizer was the moment i stopped being a victim of market makers who can see every single move i make the hardest part of trading is the transition from manual clicking to full automation and that is where most people quit because they think it is an all or nothing game. you do not need a bot that does everything on day one but you do need a way to stop yourself from over trading and hitting the market button like a slot machine. imagine if you could just tell a script to enter a position for you slowly over time so you never have to worry about catching a falling knife ever again the secret weapon in this 2026 landscape is something i call the easy bot which is basically a remote control for your trading discipline. most people use too much leverage and never take profits because their brain tells them it will go higher right before the dump hits. by using a chunking entry system you can tell your bot to buy a position piece by piece which averages your entry and keeps your heart rate low most traders do not realize that exchanges and market makers can see your stop loss sitting right there on the order book like a giant target. if you are tired of getting stopped out only to see the price immediately reverse in your direction then you need to understand the power of a ghost stop loss. a ghost stop loss lives in your code and not on the exchange so the market makers have no idea where your pain point is until the bot actually sends the close order this invisible protection is a game changer for anyone trading on high volatility chains like solana or hyperliquid where the wick hunting is relentless. i learned this the hard way after watching my manual trades get hunted over and over while my automated systems stayed perfectly safe in the shadows. once you have a bot monitoring your positions for you the stress of a potential liquidation basically vanishes because the machine does not hesitate when it is time to exit the real fun begins when you start thinking like a market maker instead of a gambler who is just hoping for a moon shot. instead of guessing where the top is you can set up a simple logic loop that says buy under this price and sell over that price all day long. this allows you to capture the sideways chop that normally drains a manual trader through fees and bad entries while you are out at the beach or focusing on your business breakout trading is another area where manual traders lose their edge because they are either too slow to react or they enter way too late on a fake out. a simple script can sit there and monitor price action 24/7 with more patience than any human being could ever dream of having. when the breakout actually happens the bot triggers the entry in milliseconds while you are still trying to unlock your phone and open the exchange app i started learning to code live on youtube because i wanted to prove that anyone can do this if they are willing to iterate to success. it is not about getting it perfect on the first try but about building the foundation with functions that get the position and check the token price. every single bot i run today is just a combination of these basic building blocks that i have refined over the last five years of building in public if you are still trading by hand you are essentially bringing a knife to a gunfight in a market that is increasingly dominated by ai and high frequency systems. my goal with the road map and the open source code is to give you the same tools the big players have without you having to spend a fortune on devs. code allows you to backtest your ideas against historical data so you can see if your strategy actually works before you risk a single dollar of your hard earned capital the journey from a hand trader to a pseudo automated trader is the most important step you will ever take for your financial freedom. as you start to automate your entries and exits you will notice that your life gets better because the machine handles the boredom and the stress. eventually you will find that you are no longer chasing the market but instead you are letting your systems do the work while you live your life the way you want to i believe that the era of the manual retail trader is coming to an end but the era of the retail coder is just getting started. through the pain of my own liquidations i found the path to automation and i am never going back to the old way of doing things. keep building and keep iterating because the great equalizer is right there in the terminal waiting for you to take control of your future

Moon Dev

38,657 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten