Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“Far from shrinking under Andy Burnham, the hardcore Zionist influence at the very top of the British government has actually grown... From day one, Downing Street is broadcasting total alignment with Washington, Tel Aviv, and the transatlantic security establishment.” ​A close examination of team Burnham's first appointments and diplomatic...

TheCanaryUK's profile picture

Canary

115,856 subscribers

14,274 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"The first foreign visit I would do as leader of the Labour Party would be to Israel." A 2015 video of Andy Burnham has resurfaced online and is drawing renewed criticism, focusing on his statement that his first foreign visit as Labour leader would be to Israel. The clip, recorded during the Labour leadership contest, shows Burnham explicitly naming Israel as his priority international destination. Critics argue the remarks reflect the prominence given to Israel within UK political circles and question why it was singled out ahead of other countries in a leadership pitch. The footage has reignited wider debate about foreign policy priorities in Westminster alongside the influence of Israel-related advocacy and lobbying within British politics. The video is circulating again as Burnham’s national profile rises, with the comments from the leadership race now being re-examined in a more critical light.
0:33

"The first foreign visit I would do as leader of the Labour Party would be to Israel." A 2015 video of Andy Burnham has resurfaced online and is drawing renewed criticism, focusing on his statement that his first foreign visit as Labour leader would be to Israel. The clip, recorded during the Labour leadership contest, shows Burnham explicitly naming Israel as his priority international destination. Critics argue the remarks reflect the prominence given to Israel within UK political circles and question why it was singled out ahead of other countries in a leadership pitch. The footage has reignited wider debate about foreign policy priorities in Westminster alongside the influence of Israel-related advocacy and lobbying within British politics. The video is circulating again as Burnham’s national profile rises, with the comments from the leadership race now being re-examined in a more critical light.

Middle East Eye

83,517 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 ✅ Bridget Phillipson make a good point on Andy Burnham (responding to McSweeney’s claim Labour wasn’t ready to govern after 4 years): “Andy Burnham has been in Cabinet previously. He’s held a number of roles. He’s been an MP before. He actually has more experience of governing than many of us did when we entered government for the very first time as ministers in 2024.” Unlike Andy Burnham, who has real Cabinet and parliamentary experience, neither Starmer nor McSweeney had ever held office while Labour were in power. Starmer then sacked Sue Gray, the one senior figure who actually knew how government worked and their attempt to rule with iron fist failed spectacularly. The inexperience at the top has been glaring.
2:13

🚨 ✅ Bridget Phillipson make a good point on Andy Burnham (responding to McSweeney’s claim Labour wasn’t ready to govern after 4 years): “Andy Burnham has been in Cabinet previously. He’s held a number of roles. He’s been an MP before. He actually has more experience of governing than many of us did when we entered government for the very first time as ministers in 2024.” Unlike Andy Burnham, who has real Cabinet and parliamentary experience, neither Starmer nor McSweeney had ever held office while Labour were in power. Starmer then sacked Sue Gray, the one senior figure who actually knew how government worked and their attempt to rule with iron fist failed spectacularly. The inexperience at the top has been glaring.

Liz Webster

40,438 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Immigration and censorship are about to get worse under Andy Burnham. Communist activists are now at the heart of government. Burnham has hired Matthew McGregor, former Director of Hope Not Hate, as Director of Political Strategy in 10 Downing Street, and Alison Phillips, a current board member of Hope Not Hate, as his Director of Transition. McGregor worked for the Obama campaign in 2012 and led Hope Not Hate's campaign against Nigel Farage and the Brexit Party in 2019. McGregor is also on the board of charity Reprieve, which campaigns to abolish the ability to strip British citizenship from the likes of Rochdale rape gang leader Shabir Ahmed and ISIS bride Shamima Begum. Phillips was editor of The Daily Mirror (2018 to 2024) and head of Labour Together. She writes incessant articles attacking Reform UK, and endorsed Nick Lowles' book on how to smear and censor their political opponents as "far right" and antisemites. Hope Not Hate trustee Baroness Ruth Anderson (formerly Smeeth) remains the Parliamentary Secretary for the Cabinet Office and a House of Lords Whip. Bunrham is pretending to be a fresh start, while recycling figures from the orbit of Morgan McSweeney's censorious Centre for Countering Digital Hate, the Jewish Labour Movement — who weaponise accusations of antisemitism, while supporting policies that import lethal Islamic terror — and Hope Not Hate. Hope Not Hate has been rewarded, despite employing violent communist Matthew Collins, who bludgeoned women with a hammer, and convicted paedophile Liron Velleman. These figures despise Donald Trump, and the Administration will find it impossible to work with them. They want to accelerate the forces of "civilisational erasure" that the US State Department has warned about. Without external pressure applied by our allies to the British state, life is about to get much harder for patriots and critics of the Labour government. Expect deplatforming, demonetisation, and persecution in the years preceding the next general election.
37:23

Immigration and censorship are about to get worse under Andy Burnham. Communist activists are now at the heart of government. Burnham has hired Matthew McGregor, former Director of Hope Not Hate, as Director of Political Strategy in 10 Downing Street, and Alison Phillips, a current board member of Hope Not Hate, as his Director of Transition. McGregor worked for the Obama campaign in 2012 and led Hope Not Hate's campaign against Nigel Farage and the Brexit Party in 2019. McGregor is also on the board of charity Reprieve, which campaigns to abolish the ability to strip British citizenship from the likes of Rochdale rape gang leader Shabir Ahmed and ISIS bride Shamima Begum. Phillips was editor of The Daily Mirror (2018 to 2024) and head of Labour Together. She writes incessant articles attacking Reform UK, and endorsed Nick Lowles' book on how to smear and censor their political opponents as "far right" and antisemites. Hope Not Hate trustee Baroness Ruth Anderson (formerly Smeeth) remains the Parliamentary Secretary for the Cabinet Office and a House of Lords Whip. Bunrham is pretending to be a fresh start, while recycling figures from the orbit of Morgan McSweeney's censorious Centre for Countering Digital Hate, the Jewish Labour Movement — who weaponise accusations of antisemitism, while supporting policies that import lethal Islamic terror — and Hope Not Hate. Hope Not Hate has been rewarded, despite employing violent communist Matthew Collins, who bludgeoned women with a hammer, and convicted paedophile Liron Velleman. These figures despise Donald Trump, and the Administration will find it impossible to work with them. They want to accelerate the forces of "civilisational erasure" that the US State Department has warned about. Without external pressure applied by our allies to the British state, life is about to get much harder for patriots and critics of the Labour government. Expect deplatforming, demonetisation, and persecution in the years preceding the next general election.

Connor Tomlinson

31,936 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Revealed: Sadiq Khan's disturbing connections to Muslim extremists Khan portrays himself as soft centre-left Labour. How can that be squared with his support for, & defence of radical Muslim extremists, anti-Semites & misogynists? Khan defended the vile Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, saying "he is not the extremist that he is painted as being." Really? Al-Qaradawi justifies wife beating, discusses whether homosexuals should be killed and supports suicide bombers. In 2004 Khan was on a platform with five Islamic extremists at a conference in London organised by Al-Aqsa, a group that has published works by the notorious Holocaust denier Paul Eisen. From 2001-2002, Khan was a solicitor for the despicable "Nation of Islam" and tried to overturn the travel ban preventing its appalling leader, Louis Farrakhan, from entering the UK. Louis Farrakhan is a rampant anti-Semite who combines black power with Islam. Farrakhan has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great man’ In 2006, when Khan was an MP, Khan was one of the signatories of a letter to the Guardian that blamed terrorist incidents, such as 7/7, not on Islamic extremism but on British foreign policy and Britain's support for Israel. Khan likes to portray himself as part of the soft centre Left of politics, a fuzzy progressive. In truth he is far closer to Jeremy Corbyn and the independent Muslim vote MPs. Remember Khan nominated Corbyn for the leadership contest in 2015. And Khan wouldn’t have won the election without the support of Corbyn’s allies, including Len McCluskey, the unions and Momentum – the radically far-left organisation that got the vote out for him. No surprise either that his biggest cheerleaders are other far left radicals like Owen Jones, Dianne Abbott and Dawn Butler.
4:12

Revealed: Sadiq Khan's disturbing connections to Muslim extremists Khan portrays himself as soft centre-left Labour. How can that be squared with his support for, & defence of radical Muslim extremists, anti-Semites & misogynists? Khan defended the vile Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, saying "he is not the extremist that he is painted as being." Really? Al-Qaradawi justifies wife beating, discusses whether homosexuals should be killed and supports suicide bombers. In 2004 Khan was on a platform with five Islamic extremists at a conference in London organised by Al-Aqsa, a group that has published works by the notorious Holocaust denier Paul Eisen. From 2001-2002, Khan was a solicitor for the despicable "Nation of Islam" and tried to overturn the travel ban preventing its appalling leader, Louis Farrakhan, from entering the UK. Louis Farrakhan is a rampant anti-Semite who combines black power with Islam. Farrakhan has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great man’ In 2006, when Khan was an MP, Khan was one of the signatories of a letter to the Guardian that blamed terrorist incidents, such as 7/7, not on Islamic extremism but on British foreign policy and Britain's support for Israel. Khan likes to portray himself as part of the soft centre Left of politics, a fuzzy progressive. In truth he is far closer to Jeremy Corbyn and the independent Muslim vote MPs. Remember Khan nominated Corbyn for the leadership contest in 2015. And Khan wouldn’t have won the election without the support of Corbyn’s allies, including Len McCluskey, the unions and Momentum – the radically far-left organisation that got the vote out for him. No surprise either that his biggest cheerleaders are other far left radicals like Owen Jones, Dianne Abbott and Dawn Butler.

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

201,643 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Prime Minister Keir Starmer & Yvette Cooper must provide a clarification to the UK and the world if their governments long standing stated position has shifted, on the issue of Jammu and Kashmir being a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan to resolve. Under the previous Conservatives government, imagine the uproar from The Labour Party and its Pakistani origin MPs had Rishi Sunak, Priti Patel MP or Suella Braverman MP taken a position coloured by their Indian heritage. They instead demonstrated that their loyalty lay firmly with Britain’s progress and its politics, refusing to import the politics of the Indian subcontinent onto the streets of London. In stark contrast, the current Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood MP has repeatedly chosen to platform foreign politics, especially that of the Indian subcontinent onto British soil, even alongside Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan. This sets a deeply worrying precedent for UK, especially when her leanings appear contrary to established British foreign policy. The British Government owes a clear explanation not only to India in the UK, Narendra Modi & Dr. S. Jaishankar, but also to the ~2 million British Indians. They deserve to know how Shabana Mahmood MP intends to carry out her duties as Home Secretary without allowing personal bias to seep in - a bias that aligns with a state whose official state doctrine openly embraces asymmetrical warfare and terrorism.
0:49

Prime Minister Keir Starmer & Yvette Cooper must provide a clarification to the UK and the world if their governments long standing stated position has shifted, on the issue of Jammu and Kashmir being a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan to resolve. Under the previous Conservatives government, imagine the uproar from The Labour Party and its Pakistani origin MPs had Rishi Sunak, Priti Patel MP or Suella Braverman MP taken a position coloured by their Indian heritage. They instead demonstrated that their loyalty lay firmly with Britain’s progress and its politics, refusing to import the politics of the Indian subcontinent onto the streets of London. In stark contrast, the current Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood MP has repeatedly chosen to platform foreign politics, especially that of the Indian subcontinent onto British soil, even alongside Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan. This sets a deeply worrying precedent for UK, especially when her leanings appear contrary to established British foreign policy. The British Government owes a clear explanation not only to India in the UK, Narendra Modi & Dr. S. Jaishankar, but also to the ~2 million British Indians. They deserve to know how Shabana Mahmood MP intends to carry out her duties as Home Secretary without allowing personal bias to seep in - a bias that aligns with a state whose official state doctrine openly embraces asymmetrical warfare and terrorism.

Adit

189,635 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

“Andy Burnham has spent years crafting a specific public myth. He is the 'King of the North,' the casual jacket-wearing, anti-Westminster populist who promised to smash the Whitehall bubble, reverse decades of devastating de-industrialization, and bring failing water utilities back under public control.” ​But as he prepares to enter Downing Street as Prime Minister, the mask has officially slipped. Burnham has handed the keys of Number 10 to his new Chief of Staff, James Purnell—the ex-chair of Labour Friends of Israel, a former BBC executive, and the CEO of Flint Global, an elite corporate lobbying outfit that protects private water companies from state takeovers and was recently sold to a private equity firm notorious for price-gouging the NHS. ​This appointment exposes the absolute hypocrisy behind Burnham's carefully managed rhetoric on devolution and public control. Before he even steps foot inside Number Ten, we must demand a full, unvarnished list of all James Purnell's corporate conflicts of interest—because right now, devolution and reindustrialization is the bait, and corporate capture is the switch. ​ Editor: Ranjan Balakumaran Ranjan Balakumaran
2:59

“Andy Burnham has spent years crafting a specific public myth. He is the 'King of the North,' the casual jacket-wearing, anti-Westminster populist who promised to smash the Whitehall bubble, reverse decades of devastating de-industrialization, and bring failing water utilities back under public control.” ​But as he prepares to enter Downing Street as Prime Minister, the mask has officially slipped. Burnham has handed the keys of Number 10 to his new Chief of Staff, James Purnell—the ex-chair of Labour Friends of Israel, a former BBC executive, and the CEO of Flint Global, an elite corporate lobbying outfit that protects private water companies from state takeovers and was recently sold to a private equity firm notorious for price-gouging the NHS. ​This appointment exposes the absolute hypocrisy behind Burnham's carefully managed rhetoric on devolution and public control. Before he even steps foot inside Number Ten, we must demand a full, unvarnished list of all James Purnell's corporate conflicts of interest—because right now, devolution and reindustrialization is the bait, and corporate capture is the switch. ​ Editor: Ranjan Balakumaran Ranjan Balakumaran

Canary

133,781 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

And there we have it. Tomorrow Andy Burnham will become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, having blazed a singular trail to No. 10 that avoided ever having to defend, let alone stand on the Labour manifesto of the 2024 general election. Already, the total unfitness of the man for high office is beginning to be noticed, with a particularly striking online meme comparing his cringe-Dad antics to those of David Brent. Just how quickly his twee and cloying bonhomie falls apart on contact with the realities of political power we'll find out from next week. For my guest this week, Michael Murphy , Burnham is an even more dangerous figure to put in charge of the country than Sir Keir Starmer. The two represent either side of the same coin: while Starmer's dour legalism represented the underlying mechanics of the British state in all its brute force (the man was never more at home than when clamping down furiously on dissenting speech), Burnham is the smiling, matey facade that that state presents to the public; the tie-less, "call me Andy" school teacher who sits on a chair backwards to explain how he "gets it". But while Starmer included in his team some people who did recognise the priorities of the British working class, for example Morgan McSweeney, Burnham has swept to power on the back of the worst instincts of the already spectacularly inept Parliamentary Labour Party; a gang of charity-sector charlatans so clueless about the real world that they'd be more at home in a playschool. We must prepare for a very rough couple of years with this man at the helm. The world is rapidly becoming more dangerous, Britain is exposed and our enemies know it. The one possible silver lining we can take is that when Andy Burnham fails, perhaps the public will finally realise that that failure will not just be his own, but the failure of the entire Labour Party.
50:46

And there we have it. Tomorrow Andy Burnham will become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, having blazed a singular trail to No. 10 that avoided ever having to defend, let alone stand on the Labour manifesto of the 2024 general election. Already, the total unfitness of the man for high office is beginning to be noticed, with a particularly striking online meme comparing his cringe-Dad antics to those of David Brent. Just how quickly his twee and cloying bonhomie falls apart on contact with the realities of political power we'll find out from next week. For my guest this week, Michael Murphy , Burnham is an even more dangerous figure to put in charge of the country than Sir Keir Starmer. The two represent either side of the same coin: while Starmer's dour legalism represented the underlying mechanics of the British state in all its brute force (the man was never more at home than when clamping down furiously on dissenting speech), Burnham is the smiling, matey facade that that state presents to the public; the tie-less, "call me Andy" school teacher who sits on a chair backwards to explain how he "gets it". But while Starmer included in his team some people who did recognise the priorities of the British working class, for example Morgan McSweeney, Burnham has swept to power on the back of the worst instincts of the already spectacularly inept Parliamentary Labour Party; a gang of charity-sector charlatans so clueless about the real world that they'd be more at home in a playschool. We must prepare for a very rough couple of years with this man at the helm. The world is rapidly becoming more dangerous, Britain is exposed and our enemies know it. The one possible silver lining we can take is that when Andy Burnham fails, perhaps the public will finally realise that that failure will not just be his own, but the failure of the entire Labour Party.

David Starkey

204,766 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Hillary Clinton tried to take down her political enemy by coming up with NOTHING besides LIES. Ex-CIA Dir. John Brennan's own handwritten notes, while with Obama in the Oval Office: "Alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian Security Services." – Letter sent by, at the time, DNI Ratcliffe to Sen. Graham, September 29, 2020, about John Brennan's handwritten notes with Obama in the Oval Office Brennan, Comey, and Clapper ALL lied and withheld information not only from the American people but from Congress itself. They weaponized the power of the United States government to frame a sitting president as an agent of a hostile foreign nation, and it was ALL a LIE. This is the biggest political scandal of our lifetime, and we want to see some accountability already. It's time to turn up the heat.🔥
4:58

Hillary Clinton tried to take down her political enemy by coming up with NOTHING besides LIES. Ex-CIA Dir. John Brennan's own handwritten notes, while with Obama in the Oval Office: "Alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian Security Services." – Letter sent by, at the time, DNI Ratcliffe to Sen. Graham, September 29, 2020, about John Brennan's handwritten notes with Obama in the Oval Office Brennan, Comey, and Clapper ALL lied and withheld information not only from the American people but from Congress itself. They weaponized the power of the United States government to frame a sitting president as an agent of a hostile foreign nation, and it was ALL a LIE. This is the biggest political scandal of our lifetime, and we want to see some accountability already. It's time to turn up the heat.🔥

The SCIF

52,618 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

People are waiting for a false flag attack But I think the false flags are already taking place... From the mystery surrounding Charlie Kirk's shooter to the rooftop ICE sniper to bombs at TPUSA events - real events are being exploited to usher in a censorship state My hunch is this is only be the beginning And the rubric for the false flags this time won't be a single large event but instead much more like the Israel's Lavon Affair false flag This is the story of the Lavon Affair: The Lavon Affair was a failed Israeli covert false flag operation conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. A group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets like cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The plan was to carry out the bombings and then blame the bombings on various Muslim groups in an attempt to force the British to keep their military presence in Egypt. Israel may have been created after the end of WWII in 1948 but tensions had existed between the Jews and Muslims over who got what lands in the Palestine region since before even the Balfour declaration (the legal document from the British promising Jews the Palestine region) was signed in 1917. And when the British officially withdrew from Palestine in 1948 Israel immediately went to war with its new neighbors over territorial disputes in what became known as the First Arab-Israeli War. Despite the First Arab-Israeli War, in the early 1950s, the US initiated a policy in favor of Egyptian nationalism. This American Pro-Egyptian nationalist policy meant the British – who occupied Egypt at the time – would begin withdrawing their troops from the country. This withdraw of the British from Egypt also meant Israel would lose most of the influence they had over Egypt and, even more importantly to Israel, this withdraw of the British meant Israel would lose their influence over the Suez Canal. It also potentially meant Israel would have to fight another war to secure influence over those critical locations again. With the Suez canal being vitally important for controlling the trade routes that dominate the Middle East region, the Israelis knew they had to do something to stop this withdraw of British troops and their subsequent loss of regional control, so they initiated Operation Susannah (more popularly known as the Lavon Affair). The goal of Operation Susannah was to carry out bombings and other acts of sabotage in Egypt with the aim of creating a sense that a British withdraw from the country would create such instability in the region that the nationalist aspirations for Egypt would be dropped by America and the international community. Israeli author Doron Geller stated the intent was to “make it clear to the whole world that Egypt’s new rulers were nothing but a group of foolhardy extremists, unreliable and unworthy of taking charge of an asset as important as the Suez Canal. Furthermore, it was to be demonstrated that their grasp on power was uncertain, that they faced powerful internal opposition, and, consequently, they were unworthy of being counted upon as a dependable ally.” The Israelis tasked a covert unit called Unit 131 with carrying out Project Susannah. This Unit was a composed of Egyptian nationals of Jewish heritage who had been recruited in Egypt to do covert missions on behalf of the new Israeli state and in spring of 1954 the unit was activated. On July 2, 1954 Unit 131 detonated a few bombs at an Egyptian Post Office in Alexandria. 12 days later - on July 14th - the Unit bombed the libraries of the US Information Agency in Alexandria as well as a British-owned theater. And finally, nine days later, on July 23rd 1954, Unit 131 took firebombs to the Cairo railway station and to movie theaters in Cairo and Alexandria. Unfortunately for Unit 131, during the July 23rd attack a bomb began to prematurely detonate in the pocket of one of the Israeli spies and he was taken in to custody by Egyptian police. The police would find the bomb on the spy as well as evidence in the apartment of the captured spy leading them to the rest of Unit 131. Ultimately 11 members of Unit 131 were arrested and, by the time it was all said and done, two of the member of Unit 131 committed suicide in prison, two were hanged, two escaped back to Israel, and most of the others got prison time. After the British left Egypt, the Suez Canal would become nationalized by the Egyptians and would fall under Egyptian control. This would lead the Israels to go on to invade Egypt two years later with the support of the British and the French in what’s known as the Suez Crisis or the Second Arab-Israeli war. The attempted invasion of Egypt would fail after intense international pressure condemned it and threatened action against Israel and the other invading countries for their invasion. The Lavon Affair differs somewhat unique in the world of false flag attacks because rather than being a single event it was – or at least it was planned to be before it was prematurely foiled – a series of events to terrorize targets in to submitting to a political end. I think it shows that although a singular false flag event can be useful, a series of events over a period of time is another useful tool in the bag of people carrying out false flag attacks to terrorize a populace in to submission to their political goals. Multiple operations obviously carry more risk than a single operation but they can be an equally effective method of false flag and can keep a population in a state of fear for a prolonged period of time.
3:11

People are waiting for a false flag attack But I think the false flags are already taking place... From the mystery surrounding Charlie Kirk's shooter to the rooftop ICE sniper to bombs at TPUSA events - real events are being exploited to usher in a censorship state My hunch is this is only be the beginning And the rubric for the false flags this time won't be a single large event but instead much more like the Israel's Lavon Affair false flag This is the story of the Lavon Affair: The Lavon Affair was a failed Israeli covert false flag operation conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. A group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets like cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The plan was to carry out the bombings and then blame the bombings on various Muslim groups in an attempt to force the British to keep their military presence in Egypt. Israel may have been created after the end of WWII in 1948 but tensions had existed between the Jews and Muslims over who got what lands in the Palestine region since before even the Balfour declaration (the legal document from the British promising Jews the Palestine region) was signed in 1917. And when the British officially withdrew from Palestine in 1948 Israel immediately went to war with its new neighbors over territorial disputes in what became known as the First Arab-Israeli War. Despite the First Arab-Israeli War, in the early 1950s, the US initiated a policy in favor of Egyptian nationalism. This American Pro-Egyptian nationalist policy meant the British – who occupied Egypt at the time – would begin withdrawing their troops from the country. This withdraw of the British from Egypt also meant Israel would lose most of the influence they had over Egypt and, even more importantly to Israel, this withdraw of the British meant Israel would lose their influence over the Suez Canal. It also potentially meant Israel would have to fight another war to secure influence over those critical locations again. With the Suez canal being vitally important for controlling the trade routes that dominate the Middle East region, the Israelis knew they had to do something to stop this withdraw of British troops and their subsequent loss of regional control, so they initiated Operation Susannah (more popularly known as the Lavon Affair). The goal of Operation Susannah was to carry out bombings and other acts of sabotage in Egypt with the aim of creating a sense that a British withdraw from the country would create such instability in the region that the nationalist aspirations for Egypt would be dropped by America and the international community. Israeli author Doron Geller stated the intent was to “make it clear to the whole world that Egypt’s new rulers were nothing but a group of foolhardy extremists, unreliable and unworthy of taking charge of an asset as important as the Suez Canal. Furthermore, it was to be demonstrated that their grasp on power was uncertain, that they faced powerful internal opposition, and, consequently, they were unworthy of being counted upon as a dependable ally.” The Israelis tasked a covert unit called Unit 131 with carrying out Project Susannah. This Unit was a composed of Egyptian nationals of Jewish heritage who had been recruited in Egypt to do covert missions on behalf of the new Israeli state and in spring of 1954 the unit was activated. On July 2, 1954 Unit 131 detonated a few bombs at an Egyptian Post Office in Alexandria. 12 days later - on July 14th - the Unit bombed the libraries of the US Information Agency in Alexandria as well as a British-owned theater. And finally, nine days later, on July 23rd 1954, Unit 131 took firebombs to the Cairo railway station and to movie theaters in Cairo and Alexandria. Unfortunately for Unit 131, during the July 23rd attack a bomb began to prematurely detonate in the pocket of one of the Israeli spies and he was taken in to custody by Egyptian police. The police would find the bomb on the spy as well as evidence in the apartment of the captured spy leading them to the rest of Unit 131. Ultimately 11 members of Unit 131 were arrested and, by the time it was all said and done, two of the member of Unit 131 committed suicide in prison, two were hanged, two escaped back to Israel, and most of the others got prison time. After the British left Egypt, the Suez Canal would become nationalized by the Egyptians and would fall under Egyptian control. This would lead the Israels to go on to invade Egypt two years later with the support of the British and the French in what’s known as the Suez Crisis or the Second Arab-Israeli war. The attempted invasion of Egypt would fail after intense international pressure condemned it and threatened action against Israel and the other invading countries for their invasion. The Lavon Affair differs somewhat unique in the world of false flag attacks because rather than being a single event it was – or at least it was planned to be before it was prematurely foiled – a series of events to terrorize targets in to submitting to a political end. I think it shows that although a singular false flag event can be useful, a series of events over a period of time is another useful tool in the bag of people carrying out false flag attacks to terrorize a populace in to submission to their political goals. Multiple operations obviously carry more risk than a single operation but they can be an equally effective method of false flag and can keep a population in a state of fear for a prolonged period of time.

Bobby Thorne

58,724 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

There are a few things things that college kids—especially the ones chanting "free palestine" and "from the river to the sea"—should know about the history and founding of Israel. A Palestinian state was already created in 1921. There was a British mandate of Palestine, which was a foreign occupied colony of the British Empire, which comprised modern-day what's Israel and what's now Jordan. The Jews believed they were entitled, based on the Balfour Declaration of 1917, to the entire mandate of Palestine to be the future Jewish state. In 1921, it became clear that wasn't to be. The British understood they were gonna need oil from the Arab states in a future global conflict, and so they ceded 77% of that land to create a state for the Arab Muslim Palestinians. They weren't called Palestinians then, but they were the Arab Muslims who lived in the British colony of Palestine. That country became first known as Transjordan on the other side of the Jordan, then it became the Kingdom of Jordan, and ultimately today we know it as Jordan. So there is a Palestinian state full of Palestinian Muslim Arabs. There's a Palestinian queen in that state today. The prince and future king of that state is a Palestinian, and over 60% of the population are people who are Arab Muslims from the mandate of Palestine. So there is a Palestinian state. What they really want is a second Palestinian state, a 58th Muslim state, a 23rd Arab state in the world—but it's just too much to have one teeny-tiny Jewish state. The second and more important thing to understand is that Israel and the international community have already offered the Palestinians on six prior occasions, in 1936 in the Peel Commission, 1947 in the Partition Plan, 1967 at Khartoum after the Six-Day War in Sudan, 1993 at Oslo, 2000 at Camp David with Bill Clinton, and again 2008 with Ehud Olmert as the prime minister. On six different occasions, Israel, America, and the international community offered the Palestinians their own state, their own sovereign territory with their own government to to do as they please with, on the land that college kids now seem to believe they deserve a state on. And what college kids don't understand is the Palestinians rejected that state on six different occasions. On college campuses, when kids chant "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," realize that is only the English jingle that was created in order to appeal to and deceive American college kids. In Arabic, the original phrase is: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be Arabic." They want a full Palestinian Arab state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with no Jews on it. That's what they've done in every other Arab country in the world, where they've expelled and ethnically cleansed the 850,000 Jews who lived all over the Muslim world, starting in the middle of the 20th century. People who have lived there, by the way, for centuries, all ethnically cleansed. They want to do the same thing with the 10 million people who now live in Israel, and we're never gonna allow that to happen.
3:25

There are a few things things that college kids—especially the ones chanting "free palestine" and "from the river to the sea"—should know about the history and founding of Israel. A Palestinian state was already created in 1921. There was a British mandate of Palestine, which was a foreign occupied colony of the British Empire, which comprised modern-day what's Israel and what's now Jordan. The Jews believed they were entitled, based on the Balfour Declaration of 1917, to the entire mandate of Palestine to be the future Jewish state. In 1921, it became clear that wasn't to be. The British understood they were gonna need oil from the Arab states in a future global conflict, and so they ceded 77% of that land to create a state for the Arab Muslim Palestinians. They weren't called Palestinians then, but they were the Arab Muslims who lived in the British colony of Palestine. That country became first known as Transjordan on the other side of the Jordan, then it became the Kingdom of Jordan, and ultimately today we know it as Jordan. So there is a Palestinian state full of Palestinian Muslim Arabs. There's a Palestinian queen in that state today. The prince and future king of that state is a Palestinian, and over 60% of the population are people who are Arab Muslims from the mandate of Palestine. So there is a Palestinian state. What they really want is a second Palestinian state, a 58th Muslim state, a 23rd Arab state in the world—but it's just too much to have one teeny-tiny Jewish state. The second and more important thing to understand is that Israel and the international community have already offered the Palestinians on six prior occasions, in 1936 in the Peel Commission, 1947 in the Partition Plan, 1967 at Khartoum after the Six-Day War in Sudan, 1993 at Oslo, 2000 at Camp David with Bill Clinton, and again 2008 with Ehud Olmert as the prime minister. On six different occasions, Israel, America, and the international community offered the Palestinians their own state, their own sovereign territory with their own government to to do as they please with, on the land that college kids now seem to believe they deserve a state on. And what college kids don't understand is the Palestinians rejected that state on six different occasions. On college campuses, when kids chant "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," realize that is only the English jingle that was created in order to appeal to and deceive American college kids. In Arabic, the original phrase is: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be Arabic." They want a full Palestinian Arab state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with no Jews on it. That's what they've done in every other Arab country in the world, where they've expelled and ethnically cleansed the 850,000 Jews who lived all over the Muslim world, starting in the middle of the 20th century. People who have lived there, by the way, for centuries, all ethnically cleansed. They want to do the same thing with the 10 million people who now live in Israel, and we're never gonna allow that to happen.

Roy K. Altman

46,451 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

New footage obtained by B’Tselem uncovers the moments when the Abu Haikal family was shot. Seven-month-old Sam Abu Haikal was killed in the shooting, and both his parents were injured. The footage clearly shows that the Israeli soldier fired at the car as it was slowing to a stop. The car was far from the soldiers and posed no danger to them whatsoever. Moments later, in another video obtained by B’Tselem, seven-month-old Sam’s father, Fahed, is seen just after his son was shot. Fahed is holding baby Sam in his arms, trying to stop the bleeding from his head with his hands, while Sam’s mother, Daniyah, who was also injured by the gunfire while holding her son, is seen sitting on the ground, next to the car. Last Friday, 5 June, an Israeli soldier fired at a Palestinian family driving home from a family visit, as they sat in their car in the Tel Rumeidah neighborhood in Hebron. The family was shot as the car was slowing to a stop at the soldier’s command. Sam, a seven‑month‑old baby who was in his mother’s arms in the back seat, was struck in the head and pronounced dead shortly afterward. Sam’s parents were also injured by the gunfire; his mother is still in the hospital. After the shooting, the soldier who fired and another soldier who was with him left the scene without checking the car or offering any assistance to the critically wounded baby or to his mother. In the past two and a half years, Israel has killed tens of thousands of children in Gaza and the West Bank. The immunity it gets from the international community has led to a reality where, under Israeli rule, Palestinian lives are entirely disposable – even a seven‑month‑old baby.
0:38

New footage obtained by B’Tselem uncovers the moments when the Abu Haikal family was shot. Seven-month-old Sam Abu Haikal was killed in the shooting, and both his parents were injured. The footage clearly shows that the Israeli soldier fired at the car as it was slowing to a stop. The car was far from the soldiers and posed no danger to them whatsoever. Moments later, in another video obtained by B’Tselem, seven-month-old Sam’s father, Fahed, is seen just after his son was shot. Fahed is holding baby Sam in his arms, trying to stop the bleeding from his head with his hands, while Sam’s mother, Daniyah, who was also injured by the gunfire while holding her son, is seen sitting on the ground, next to the car. Last Friday, 5 June, an Israeli soldier fired at a Palestinian family driving home from a family visit, as they sat in their car in the Tel Rumeidah neighborhood in Hebron. The family was shot as the car was slowing to a stop at the soldier’s command. Sam, a seven‑month‑old baby who was in his mother’s arms in the back seat, was struck in the head and pronounced dead shortly afterward. Sam’s parents were also injured by the gunfire; his mother is still in the hospital. After the shooting, the soldier who fired and another soldier who was with him left the scene without checking the car or offering any assistance to the critically wounded baby or to his mother. In the past two and a half years, Israel has killed tens of thousands of children in Gaza and the West Bank. The immunity it gets from the international community has led to a reality where, under Israeli rule, Palestinian lives are entirely disposable – even a seven‑month‑old baby.

B'Tselem בצלם بتسيلم

1,530,967 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

OBAMA Pentagon official publicly called for a MILITARY COUP against Trump just 10 days after becoming president. Coincidentally, the Russian Collusion Hoax and many others were initiated to take Trump down. Trump wasn't just up against Obama and the Clintons, etc., he was up against the entire corrupt system itself. Rosa Brooks, daughter of a left-wing anti-war activists and wife of a U.S. Army Special Forces officer not only called for a military coup against Trump, she even wrote about it in an article in Foreign Policy Magazine named, "3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020," January 30, 2017. Just 10 days after Trump's inauguration. Rosa actually had a fourth option. A military coup against Trump. It reads: "The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders... After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” to thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board." - Rosa Brooks Rosa Brooks worked for many NGOs and as a high-level Pentagon official from 2009 to 2011 under the Obama administration, who served as a Counselor to Under Secretary for Policy Michele Flournoy, one of the Pentagon's highest ranking civilians. This is where the plan started to go into action from within our own government against President Trump and specifically relates to the weaponization of our government and coincidentally at the same time as the Russia Collusion Hoax and many, many others to remove Trump from office or even worse. Every single individual involved MUST be held accountable or this is all for nothing.
11:44

OBAMA Pentagon official publicly called for a MILITARY COUP against Trump just 10 days after becoming president. Coincidentally, the Russian Collusion Hoax and many others were initiated to take Trump down. Trump wasn't just up against Obama and the Clintons, etc., he was up against the entire corrupt system itself. Rosa Brooks, daughter of a left-wing anti-war activists and wife of a U.S. Army Special Forces officer not only called for a military coup against Trump, she even wrote about it in an article in Foreign Policy Magazine named, "3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020," January 30, 2017. Just 10 days after Trump's inauguration. Rosa actually had a fourth option. A military coup against Trump. It reads: "The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders... After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” to thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board." - Rosa Brooks Rosa Brooks worked for many NGOs and as a high-level Pentagon official from 2009 to 2011 under the Obama administration, who served as a Counselor to Under Secretary for Policy Michele Flournoy, one of the Pentagon's highest ranking civilians. This is where the plan started to go into action from within our own government against President Trump and specifically relates to the weaponization of our government and coincidentally at the same time as the Russia Collusion Hoax and many, many others to remove Trump from office or even worse. Every single individual involved MUST be held accountable or this is all for nothing.

The SCIF

193,060 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨NEW - Kash Patel highlights the unbelievable connections between three senior Biden intelligence officials—Robert Malley, Ariane Tabatabai, and Maher Bitar—and their associations with Hamas and Iran. On June 29, 2023, Robert Malley was placed on unpaid leave from his role as Joe Biden's special envoy to Iran, and his security clearance was suspended due to an ongoing investigation into the potential mishandling of classified materials. On September 29, 2023, Semafor reported that Malley was involved in funding, supporting, and directing an Iranian intelligence operation to influence the United States and allied governments, as revealed by a collection of Iranian government emails. These emails suggested that Malley facilitated the placement of an Iranian agent of influence named Ariane Tabatabai in sensitive positions within the U.S. government, initially at the State Department and later at the Pentagon, where she has been serving as Chief of Staff for the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations. On October 16, 2023, Revolver News reported that Maher Bitar, who is Senior Director for Intelligence Programs on Joe Biden’s National Security Council, was also an executive director of the “Students for Justice in Palestine” group that reportedly responded to the recent Hamas terror attack on Israel by organizing a “Day of Resistance” in support of Hamas’ “historic win” against Israel. Bitar was photographed wearing a black and white “keffiyeh,” a symbol of Palestinian nationalism, and standing in front of a sign that reads, “Divest from Israel Apartheid.” Kash Patel has pointed out that Maher Bitar plays a significant role in determining intelligence prioritization for President Biden, even though there is a photo of him wearing Palestinian attire, calling for the economic and political boycott of Israel. Robert Malley, who recently had his security clearance suspended by the FBI, installed Ariane Tabatabai at the Department of Defense as the Assistant Chief of Staff for the Special Operations Office. Do you know what she did in 2014? "She emailed Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and asked for permission as a U.S. citizen to take a trip on behalf of the US government. This individual is still employed at the DOD." Unbelievable.
4:43

🚨NEW - Kash Patel highlights the unbelievable connections between three senior Biden intelligence officials—Robert Malley, Ariane Tabatabai, and Maher Bitar—and their associations with Hamas and Iran. On June 29, 2023, Robert Malley was placed on unpaid leave from his role as Joe Biden's special envoy to Iran, and his security clearance was suspended due to an ongoing investigation into the potential mishandling of classified materials. On September 29, 2023, Semafor reported that Malley was involved in funding, supporting, and directing an Iranian intelligence operation to influence the United States and allied governments, as revealed by a collection of Iranian government emails. These emails suggested that Malley facilitated the placement of an Iranian agent of influence named Ariane Tabatabai in sensitive positions within the U.S. government, initially at the State Department and later at the Pentagon, where she has been serving as Chief of Staff for the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations. On October 16, 2023, Revolver News reported that Maher Bitar, who is Senior Director for Intelligence Programs on Joe Biden’s National Security Council, was also an executive director of the “Students for Justice in Palestine” group that reportedly responded to the recent Hamas terror attack on Israel by organizing a “Day of Resistance” in support of Hamas’ “historic win” against Israel. Bitar was photographed wearing a black and white “keffiyeh,” a symbol of Palestinian nationalism, and standing in front of a sign that reads, “Divest from Israel Apartheid.” Kash Patel has pointed out that Maher Bitar plays a significant role in determining intelligence prioritization for President Biden, even though there is a photo of him wearing Palestinian attire, calling for the economic and political boycott of Israel. Robert Malley, who recently had his security clearance suspended by the FBI, installed Ariane Tabatabai at the Department of Defense as the Assistant Chief of Staff for the Special Operations Office. Do you know what she did in 2014? "She emailed Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and asked for permission as a U.S. citizen to take a trip on behalf of the US government. This individual is still employed at the DOD." Unbelievable.

KanekoaTheGreat

799,917 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🇪🇸|#Spain | This is not a migration crisis. It is a multi-front war orchestrated by the Mossad and the CIA and executed by Morocco against a nation that refuses to become an imperial vassal. This is not a wave of migration, it is a carefully orchestrated geopolitical attack. The people flooding the Ceuta border are not refugees; they are being used as human battering rams to punish a government that refused to bow to Washington. When Spain refused to serve as a launchpad for the U.S. war on Iran, Washington, Tel Aviv, and Rabat joined forces to weaponize the North African border. 🎯 The Real Target is Spain not Migrants On July 30, 2026, thousands of migrants predominantly young men flooded into Ceuta, Spain’s enclave in North Africa. Between 1,500 and 2,000 migrants arrived in just a few days, representing roughly 2% of Ceuta’s population. At least nine people died while attempting to swim across. But why now? Why Ceuta? Because Spain said "No." Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez refused to allow the U.S. to use two military bases in southern Spain; #Morón and #Rota to attack #Iran. Spain also refused to let ships carrying weapons to Israel dock at its ports. Spain recalled its ambassador to Israel. Spain recognized the State of Palestine. In short, Spain refused to act as a submissive puppet of the empire. The punishment - Morocco opened the floodgates. 🗺️ Who Opened the Floodgates? An Invisible Hand at Work The same thing happened in 2021. At that time, Morocco retaliated against Spain by relaxing border controls, allowing about 8,000 people to pour into Ceuta. Now, the script is playing out again but on a larger scale and with more sophisticated tools. On the Moroccan side, the auxiliary forces responsible for border security voluntarily withdrew as the crowds passed through. This was coordination not loss of control. And the timing is no coincidence too. Spain is approaching an election. A migration crisis is the perfect weapon to undermine the incumbent government, a classic tactic of the Mossad and the CIA. 🔪 The Bigger Game is the Struggle for the Strait of Gibraltar This migration crisis is merely one move in a much larger game. The real prize is the Strait of Gibraltar, a chokepoint through which approximately 10% of global maritime trade and around 100,000 vessels pass annually. In January 2026, Israel and Morocco signed a joint military action plan. Israel now supplies at least 51% of Morocco's missiles. With Israeli support, Morocco is massively expanding its drone production; it has deployed the Israeli "Spyder" air defense system and is locally manufacturing the Israeli SpyX loitering munition (kamikaze drone). A joint maritime surveillance center is currently being established on Morocco's northern coast. A U.S. report identifies the Israel-Morocco arms deal as a turning point in the balance of power within the Strait of Gibraltar. Morocco even proposed to Trump that the U.S. bases at Morón and Rota be relocated from Spain to Morocco. A Spanish general admitted: "Morón Air Base will sooner or later be moved to Morocco." Washington, Tel Aviv, and Rabat are acting in concert to push Spain out of the Strait of Gibraltar and replace it with a compliant Morocco. 💀 The "Multinational Force" in Gaza: Morocco's Ultimate Role Meanwhile, Morocco is emerging as a key implementer of Israel's post-war plans for Gaza. For the first time, Morocco will host training exercises for a multinational force expected to number around 20,000 troops. Approximately 30 Moroccan military officers have already entered Gaza to conduct on-the-ground reconnaissance. Morocco is expected to deploy around 500 soldiers to Gaza. Israeli officials now describe Morocco as Israel's most important security partner on the African continent. A nation that uses "support for Palestine" as its diplomatic calling card is now becoming an instrument of military enforcement for Israeli control over Gaza. ⚡ The Complete Chain of the Plot Here is the full picture: 1. Spain says "No": Refusing U.S. bases, Israeli arms shipments, and unconditional support for Israel. 2. Morocco opens the floodgates: Thousands of migrants pour into Ceuta, creating a crisis to punish Spain. 3. Israel supplies weapons: Missiles, drones, and air defense systems transforming Morocco into a regional military power. 4. The US provides cover: Washington supports Israel-Morocco military cooperation and tacitly condones the weaponization of migration. 5. The Strait of Gibraltar is the prize: a strategic waterway controlling 10% of global maritime trade. 6. Gaza is the ultimate goal: Morocco playing a "peacekeeping" role in Israeli-occupied Gaza.
0:36

🇪🇸|#Spain | This is not a migration crisis. It is a multi-front war orchestrated by the Mossad and the CIA and executed by Morocco against a nation that refuses to become an imperial vassal. This is not a wave of migration, it is a carefully orchestrated geopolitical attack. The people flooding the Ceuta border are not refugees; they are being used as human battering rams to punish a government that refused to bow to Washington. When Spain refused to serve as a launchpad for the U.S. war on Iran, Washington, Tel Aviv, and Rabat joined forces to weaponize the North African border. 🎯 The Real Target is Spain not Migrants On July 30, 2026, thousands of migrants predominantly young men flooded into Ceuta, Spain’s enclave in North Africa. Between 1,500 and 2,000 migrants arrived in just a few days, representing roughly 2% of Ceuta’s population. At least nine people died while attempting to swim across. But why now? Why Ceuta? Because Spain said "No." Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez refused to allow the U.S. to use two military bases in southern Spain; #Morón and #Rota to attack #Iran. Spain also refused to let ships carrying weapons to Israel dock at its ports. Spain recalled its ambassador to Israel. Spain recognized the State of Palestine. In short, Spain refused to act as a submissive puppet of the empire. The punishment - Morocco opened the floodgates. 🗺️ Who Opened the Floodgates? An Invisible Hand at Work The same thing happened in 2021. At that time, Morocco retaliated against Spain by relaxing border controls, allowing about 8,000 people to pour into Ceuta. Now, the script is playing out again but on a larger scale and with more sophisticated tools. On the Moroccan side, the auxiliary forces responsible for border security voluntarily withdrew as the crowds passed through. This was coordination not loss of control. And the timing is no coincidence too. Spain is approaching an election. A migration crisis is the perfect weapon to undermine the incumbent government, a classic tactic of the Mossad and the CIA. 🔪 The Bigger Game is the Struggle for the Strait of Gibraltar This migration crisis is merely one move in a much larger game. The real prize is the Strait of Gibraltar, a chokepoint through which approximately 10% of global maritime trade and around 100,000 vessels pass annually. In January 2026, Israel and Morocco signed a joint military action plan. Israel now supplies at least 51% of Morocco's missiles. With Israeli support, Morocco is massively expanding its drone production; it has deployed the Israeli "Spyder" air defense system and is locally manufacturing the Israeli SpyX loitering munition (kamikaze drone). A joint maritime surveillance center is currently being established on Morocco's northern coast. A U.S. report identifies the Israel-Morocco arms deal as a turning point in the balance of power within the Strait of Gibraltar. Morocco even proposed to Trump that the U.S. bases at Morón and Rota be relocated from Spain to Morocco. A Spanish general admitted: "Morón Air Base will sooner or later be moved to Morocco." Washington, Tel Aviv, and Rabat are acting in concert to push Spain out of the Strait of Gibraltar and replace it with a compliant Morocco. 💀 The "Multinational Force" in Gaza: Morocco's Ultimate Role Meanwhile, Morocco is emerging as a key implementer of Israel's post-war plans for Gaza. For the first time, Morocco will host training exercises for a multinational force expected to number around 20,000 troops. Approximately 30 Moroccan military officers have already entered Gaza to conduct on-the-ground reconnaissance. Morocco is expected to deploy around 500 soldiers to Gaza. Israeli officials now describe Morocco as Israel's most important security partner on the African continent. A nation that uses "support for Palestine" as its diplomatic calling card is now becoming an instrument of military enforcement for Israeli control over Gaza. ⚡ The Complete Chain of the Plot Here is the full picture: 1. Spain says "No": Refusing U.S. bases, Israeli arms shipments, and unconditional support for Israel. 2. Morocco opens the floodgates: Thousands of migrants pour into Ceuta, creating a crisis to punish Spain. 3. Israel supplies weapons: Missiles, drones, and air defense systems transforming Morocco into a regional military power. 4. The US provides cover: Washington supports Israel-Morocco military cooperation and tacitly condones the weaponization of migration. 5. The Strait of Gibraltar is the prize: a strategic waterway controlling 10% of global maritime trade. 6. Gaza is the ultimate goal: Morocco playing a "peacekeeping" role in Israeli-occupied Gaza.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

992,276 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

THE POLLARD AFFAIR 🇮🇱🇺🇸(1984-1985) The Pollard Affair was an espionage case involving Jonathan Jay Pollard, an American intelligence analyst who spied for Israel in the mid-1980s. Pollard, born in 1954 in Texas to a Jewish family, worked as a civilian analyst for the U.S. Navy. In 1984, he began passing classified information to Israel, motivated by a desire to aid the Jewish state, which he believed was not receiving sufficient intelligence from the U.S. despite their alliance. Pollard provided Israel with a vast amount of sensitive U.S. intelligence, including details on American signal intelligence gathering methods, military capabilities of Arab nations, and reportedly the identities of U.S. informants. The information he handed over was so extensive that it included the National Security Agency’s ten-volume manual on U.S. intelligence collection techniques. His actions were uncovered in 1985 when colleagues grew suspicious of his behavior, leading to an FBI investigation. On November 21, 1985, Pollard and his then-wife, Anne, attempted to seek asylum at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., but were turned away and arrested. In 1987, Pollard pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to deliver national defense information to a foreign government under a plea agreement. Pollard was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 30 years. The severity of his sentence stemmed from the immense damage assessed by U.S. officials, who claimed the leaked information indirectly reached the Soviet Union via Israel, compromising national security during the Cold War. The affair strained U.S.-Israel relations significantly. Initially, Israel described Pollard’s actions as a rogue operation unauthorized by its government, but in 1998, it admitted to paying him and formally apologized to the U.S. Pollard spent 30 years in prison, including seven in solitary confinement, and was released on parole in November 2015. After his parole ended in 2020, he moved to Israel, where he was welcomed by then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and granted citizenship (which Israel had already conferred in 1995 while he was imprisoned).
1:35

THE POLLARD AFFAIR 🇮🇱🇺🇸(1984-1985) The Pollard Affair was an espionage case involving Jonathan Jay Pollard, an American intelligence analyst who spied for Israel in the mid-1980s. Pollard, born in 1954 in Texas to a Jewish family, worked as a civilian analyst for the U.S. Navy. In 1984, he began passing classified information to Israel, motivated by a desire to aid the Jewish state, which he believed was not receiving sufficient intelligence from the U.S. despite their alliance. Pollard provided Israel with a vast amount of sensitive U.S. intelligence, including details on American signal intelligence gathering methods, military capabilities of Arab nations, and reportedly the identities of U.S. informants. The information he handed over was so extensive that it included the National Security Agency’s ten-volume manual on U.S. intelligence collection techniques. His actions were uncovered in 1985 when colleagues grew suspicious of his behavior, leading to an FBI investigation. On November 21, 1985, Pollard and his then-wife, Anne, attempted to seek asylum at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., but were turned away and arrested. In 1987, Pollard pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to deliver national defense information to a foreign government under a plea agreement. Pollard was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 30 years. The severity of his sentence stemmed from the immense damage assessed by U.S. officials, who claimed the leaked information indirectly reached the Soviet Union via Israel, compromising national security during the Cold War. The affair strained U.S.-Israel relations significantly. Initially, Israel described Pollard’s actions as a rogue operation unauthorized by its government, but in 1998, it admitted to paying him and formally apologized to the U.S. Pollard spent 30 years in prison, including seven in solitary confinement, and was released on parole in November 2015. After his parole ended in 2020, he moved to Israel, where he was welcomed by then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and granted citizenship (which Israel had already conferred in 1995 while he was imprisoned).

Kacee Allen

52,024 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Great speech today from Andy Burnham. But how could devo-max work in practice? Last year I asked Andy Burnham to spell it out in Parliament - where he trailed the idea of local control of labour market policy for the under-25s. That became part of a series of recommendations we made. The theory is simple. The UK is running an output gap - but that varies regionally. So, we need far more devolution of labour market policy and investment to help ensure very part of Britain is firing on all cylinders. Combine that with a ‘total place’ approach to pooled regional budgets to help transform the local state. Our key advice: 1.Skills as the proving ground. Post-16 technical education should be devolved to leaders who can commission it against the real strengths of their economy. Andy Burnham has made this case for years. The evidence backs him. 2.Devolved growth needs devolved capital. We called for British Business Bank branches in every mayoral region and a real pipeline of investable propositions. A region with its own growth plan needs a visible route to the money that funds it. 3. That should be part of a rebuild of regional banking. Bring together British Business Bank and Post Office banking hubs to put small business banking on the high street. Radically expand state-backed lending guarantees. Back it up with Community Reinvestment Act to get major banks to lean in. 4.A place-based delivery spine. Mayors should sit inside the national strategy machinery, not next to it. One table, one set of numbers, national and regional leadership together. 5. Shift the capability. Mayors told us their single biggest constraint is in-house capacity. We recommended a secondment pool from the Treasury, the Department for Business and Trade and the British Business Bank, placed directly into mayoral authorities. The argument for devolution has been won. The work now is to make it deliver.
0:55

Great speech today from Andy Burnham. But how could devo-max work in practice? Last year I asked Andy Burnham to spell it out in Parliament - where he trailed the idea of local control of labour market policy for the under-25s. That became part of a series of recommendations we made. The theory is simple. The UK is running an output gap - but that varies regionally. So, we need far more devolution of labour market policy and investment to help ensure very part of Britain is firing on all cylinders. Combine that with a ‘total place’ approach to pooled regional budgets to help transform the local state. Our key advice: 1.Skills as the proving ground. Post-16 technical education should be devolved to leaders who can commission it against the real strengths of their economy. Andy Burnham has made this case for years. The evidence backs him. 2.Devolved growth needs devolved capital. We called for British Business Bank branches in every mayoral region and a real pipeline of investable propositions. A region with its own growth plan needs a visible route to the money that funds it. 3. That should be part of a rebuild of regional banking. Bring together British Business Bank and Post Office banking hubs to put small business banking on the high street. Radically expand state-backed lending guarantees. Back it up with Community Reinvestment Act to get major banks to lean in. 4.A place-based delivery spine. Mayors should sit inside the national strategy machinery, not next to it. One table, one set of numbers, national and regional leadership together. 5. Shift the capability. Mayors told us their single biggest constraint is in-house capacity. We recommended a secondment pool from the Treasury, the Department for Business and Trade and the British Business Bank, placed directly into mayoral authorities. The argument for devolution has been won. The work now is to make it deliver.

Liam Byrne MP

44,048 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Did you know Turkey was the first Muslim-majority country to recognize Israel in 1949?🤔 Today, Turkey and Israel often criticize each other over wars, regional security, and the future of the Middle East. 🇹🇷🇮🇱 But here's the surprising part: they weren't always rivals. During the Cold War, the two countries found common interests. Turkey was a NATO member with close ties to the est,while Israel was looking for reliable regional partners.🤝 Over the years, they expanded military cooperation, shared intelligence, increased trade, and welcomed millions of tourists between the two countries. Relations began to cool in the 2000s as Turkey's foreign policy changed under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. One major turning point came in 2010, when Israeli commandos boarded the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish-led aid ship attempting to reach Gaza. The raid left ten activists dead and triggered one of the biggest diplomatic crises between the two countries. 😐 Although relations later improved for a time, repeated conflicts involving Gaza continued to strain the partnership. Today, the relationship is shaped by disagreements over Gaza, Iran, Syria, and regional security. Turkey has strongly criticized Israel's military operations in Gaza, while Israel has raised concerns about Turkey's support for Hamas, which Israel, the United States, and the European Union designate as a terrorist organization. The question now is: could Turkey and Israel rebuild their partnership one day, or has that chapter of history already come to an end?🧐 Subscribe to Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more exclusive videos like these.
2:14

Did you know Turkey was the first Muslim-majority country to recognize Israel in 1949?🤔 Today, Turkey and Israel often criticize each other over wars, regional security, and the future of the Middle East. 🇹🇷🇮🇱 But here's the surprising part: they weren't always rivals. During the Cold War, the two countries found common interests. Turkey was a NATO member with close ties to the est,while Israel was looking for reliable regional partners.🤝 Over the years, they expanded military cooperation, shared intelligence, increased trade, and welcomed millions of tourists between the two countries. Relations began to cool in the 2000s as Turkey's foreign policy changed under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. One major turning point came in 2010, when Israeli commandos boarded the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish-led aid ship attempting to reach Gaza. The raid left ten activists dead and triggered one of the biggest diplomatic crises between the two countries. 😐 Although relations later improved for a time, repeated conflicts involving Gaza continued to strain the partnership. Today, the relationship is shaped by disagreements over Gaza, Iran, Syria, and regional security. Turkey has strongly criticized Israel's military operations in Gaza, while Israel has raised concerns about Turkey's support for Hamas, which Israel, the United States, and the European Union designate as a terrorist organization. The question now is: could Turkey and Israel rebuild their partnership one day, or has that chapter of history already come to an end?🧐 Subscribe to Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more exclusive videos like these.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

245,699 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A foreign office minister has caused outrage after implying Jeremy Corbyn used antisemitic language while speaking out against the UK’s arming of the Israeli military. Lincoln MP Hamish Falconer was speaking during an urgent question in the House of Commons about the proposed expansion of the illegal E1 settlement in the West Bank, which would see Israel build more than 3,000 homes there. Falconer criticised the E1 project, which he said would divide the area “in two” and “mark a serious breach of international law”. He confirmed that ministers were “in discussions” over a ban on goods from Israeli West Bank settlements. But Corbyn, the Your Party parliamentary leader, said such a measure would be toothless without also stemming the flow of weapons and military cooperation to Israel. “It is Israel's strategy, Israel's plan, and Israel's determination we are up against. Merely condemning them for this occupation of E1 will achieve nothing,” Corbyn said. “There has to be a policy of stopping all arms trade and military cooperation of any sort with Israel until they end this settlement policy. Anything less than that simply will be just hand-wringing that the Israeli government will just ignore.” In response, Falconer said MPs needed to be “really careful in our language”.
1:11

A foreign office minister has caused outrage after implying Jeremy Corbyn used antisemitic language while speaking out against the UK’s arming of the Israeli military. Lincoln MP Hamish Falconer was speaking during an urgent question in the House of Commons about the proposed expansion of the illegal E1 settlement in the West Bank, which would see Israel build more than 3,000 homes there. Falconer criticised the E1 project, which he said would divide the area “in two” and “mark a serious breach of international law”. He confirmed that ministers were “in discussions” over a ban on goods from Israeli West Bank settlements. But Corbyn, the Your Party parliamentary leader, said such a measure would be toothless without also stemming the flow of weapons and military cooperation to Israel. “It is Israel's strategy, Israel's plan, and Israel's determination we are up against. Merely condemning them for this occupation of E1 will achieve nothing,” Corbyn said. “There has to be a policy of stopping all arms trade and military cooperation of any sort with Israel until they end this settlement policy. Anything less than that simply will be just hand-wringing that the Israeli government will just ignore.” In response, Falconer said MPs needed to be “really careful in our language”.

Novara Media

95,642 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat