Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Fastest 100K Liked MEGA Trailers: 1. #BheemlaNayak -3Mins 2. #VakeelSaab -7Mins 3. #TheyCallHimOG -16Mins 4. #Bro -21Mins 5. #UstaadBhagatSingh‍ -24Mins 6. #GameChanger -25Mins 7. #Peddi -26Mins The One and Only MEGA Saviour POWER STAR PAWAN KALYAN 📈

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

25 Years of ‘Slipknot’. The sold out 6LP Box Set is out today, limited to only 1,999 copies in the world. 42 previously unreleased tracks including the ‘Indigo Ranch Sessions’ and ‘LIVE in 2000’ — both limited to the physical box set only. The debut album ‘Slipknot’ and ‘Demos & Alternate Mixes’ can be streamed across all platforms now, and are available in multiple 2LP vinyl variants and CDs. This is first time “Purity” has been released on vinyl. ___ LP 1: ‘SLIPKNOT’ 1. 742617000027 2. (sic) 3. Eyeless 4. Wait And Bleed 5. Surfacing 6. Spit It Out 7. Tattered & Torn 8. Me Inside Side 2: 1. Liberate 2. Prosthetics 3. No Life 4. Diluted 5. Only One 6. Scissors LP 2 & 3: INDIGO RANCH MIXES (𝐁𝐎𝐗 𝐒𝐄𝐓 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐋𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐕𝐄) Side 1: 1. (sic) 2. Eyeless 3. Surfacing 4. Tattered & Torn Side 2: 1. Only One 2. Liberate 3. Suck These Nuts (Get This) 4. Killing Leslie Side 3: 1. Me Inside 2. Wait And Bleed 3. No Life 4. Interloper (Diluted) Side 4: 1. Spit It Out 2. Eeyore 3. Scissors LP 4: DEMOS & ALTERNATE MIXES 1. Wait And Bleed (Demo) 2. Snap (Demo) 3. Interloper (Demo) 4. Despise (Demo) 5. Only One (Demo) 6. Me Inside (Demo) 7. Prosthetics (Demo) Side 2: 1. Surfacing (Jay Baumgardner Mix) 2. Only One (Jay Baumgardner Mix) 3. No Life (Jay Baumgardner Mix) 4. (sic) (Ulrich Wild Mix) 5. Purity 6. Eeyore LP 5 & 6: LIVE in 2000 (𝐁𝐎𝐗 𝐒𝐄𝐓 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐋𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐕𝐄) Side 1: 1. Purity (Live In The UK 2000) 2. Prosthetics (Live In The UK 2000) 3. Spit It Out (Live In The UK 2000) 4. Wait And Bleed (Live In The UK 2000) 5. Get This (Live In The UK 2000) Side 2: 1. Surfacing (Live In The UK 2000) 2. Me Inside (Live In The UK 2000) 3. Scissors (Live In Iowa 2000)

Slipknot

282,312 views • 11 months ago

📊 Things I dislike and Like about Mikal Bridges — aka Mr. 5 First-Round Picks (Also a 2028 1st Pick Swap with BK) 🗒️ 5 firsts is the most ever for a non-All-Star and he makes the same $37M as Şengün — a homegrown All-Star. 🗒️ Mikal not the defender he once was. Last year he was last in On-Ball Screen Navigation. Here are his matchup results this season according to most points scored on him: 🍎 Josh Giddey — 21 PTS | 9:18 | 9-12 FG (75.0%) | 3-4 3PT (75.0%) | 0 To 🍎 Norman Powell — 18 PTS | 13:04 | 7-16 FG (43.8%) | 2-5 3PM | 0 To 🍎 Donovan Mitchell — 13 PTS | 5:25 | 5-9 FG (55.6%) | 0-2 3PM | 1 To 🍎 Matas Buzelis — 6 PTS | 6:24 | 2-4 FG (50.0%) | 2-2 3PT | 1 To 🍎 Anthony Edwards — 6 PTS | 4:39 | 2-4 FG (50.0%) | 2-3 3PT | 1 To 🍎 AJ Green — 6 PTS | 4:14 | 2-3 FG (66.7%) | 2-3 3PT | 1 To 📊 Defensive Profile: 🔵 D-FG%: 47.3% (bad for a perimeter defender — wings are expected to hold opponents closer to ~43–45%, anything near 47% means scorers are getting clean looks vs him) 🔵 Defensive Rating: 114.0 🔵 Usage Rate: 16% — 5 FRPs for a low-usage player is organizational malpractice (same usage tier as KCP 16.0%, Wendell Carter Jr 16.0%, rookie Egor Demin 16.4%, Hartenstein 16.5%, even Miles McBride has higher usage at 16.7%) 🧠 Shot Creation Issues: 🔵 3PM Assisted: 96.7% 🗑️ Unassisted 3s: 3.3% 🔵 FGM Assisted: 72.9% 🗑️ Unassisted FGM: 27.1% 🧠 3P% When He Dribbles: 📉 1 Dribble 33.3% 📉 2 Dribbles 0% 📉 3–6 Dribbles 33.3% 📉 7+ Dribbles 0% 📉 Pull-Up 3P% 28.6% 🪫 PPG: 16.2 (not worth 5 1st round picks) for context: 🍁 RJ Barrett 19.1 PPG 🔥 Jaime Jaquez JR. 17.1 PPG 🛎️ Quentin Grimes 16.8 PPG 🍀 Payton Pritchard 16.4 PPG ⚡️ Ajay Mitchell 16.3 PPG 📊 What I Do Like About Mikal: 🥷 2.0 STL 🧱 0.9 BLK 🥇 AST% 19.5% (career high) 🥇 AST/TO 5.36 (career high) 📈 FG% 48.6% 🎯 3P% 41.7% 📈 3P% on 0 Dribbles: 45.5% This isn’t enough production. He gives us almost no shot creation, and while he’s elite on corner 3s, we didn’t trade 5 firsts and a 2028 swap for a spot-up role player. The bare minimum expectation for Mikal Bridges should be All-Star production — not role-player numbers. #NewYorkForever #SNYK #NYKx #NYK #Knicks #NYC #MikalBridges

🇬🇭State🇬🇭

37,034 views • 8 months ago

Self Attention by hand ✍️ ~ 9 steps walkthrough below Self-attention is what enables LLMs to understand context. How does it work? So I drew and calculated one entirely by hand. Goal: turn four 6D features into four 3D attention weighted features, filling in every cell yourself. = 1. Given = Four feature vectors, six dimensions each, one per position. = 2. Query, key, value = Let us multiply the features by WQ, WK and WV. Queries, keys and values all come out of the same four features, and that is what the word "self" is doing in self-attention. = 3. Prepare for MatMul = We copy the queries across the top and the transposed keys down the side. Lining the two up is half the work. = 4. MatMul = Let us multiply K transpose by Q. Every cell is the dot product of one key with one query, which we use as a matching score. That works because the dot product is the numerator of cosine similarity: it is how alike two vectors are, before anyone divides by their lengths. = 5. Scale = We divide by the square root of dk, the dimension of a key vector, here 3. Without it the scores grow with the dimension and a 64-wide head would swamp the softmax. To keep the page doable in pen, the drawing approximates dividing by root 3 with halving. = 6. e to the power = Let us raise e to the power of each score. This is the first half of softmax, and the drawing uses 3 in place of e, which is close enough to do in your head. = 7. Sum = We add up each column: 16, 6, 7 and 12. = 8. Normalize = Let us divide every cell by its column sum. That gives the attention weight matrix in yellow, and each of its four columns is now a probability distribution over the four positions. The decimals are nudged as they are rounded, so every column still sums to exactly 1. = 9. MatMul = We multiply the value vectors by those weights. Each output is a blend of all four values, mixed in the proportion the attention matrix just decided, and it goes to the position-wise feed forward network in the next layer: the FFN box at the bottom of the page. The outputs: Attention weights (A), by column = [.2, .6, 0, .2], [.2, .4, .2, .2], [.4, .2, 0, .4], [.1, .7, .1, .1] Attention weighted features (Z) = [8, 2, 6], [8, 4, 4], [16, 4, 2], [4, 2, 7] The takeaway: attention is a weighted average, and everything before step 9 exists to decide the weights. Compare every position with every other, turn the scores into one distribution per position, then blend. 💾 Save this post!

Tom Yeh

26,989 views • 13 days ago

Here is where u can find them, pls note that celibacy is not a dogma but a discipline, oh and one that didn’t make the list was confessing your sins to a priest, next time. ______________ 1. The Papacy ◦Matt 16:18–19 (Peter as rock, keys of the kingdom) ◦John 21:15–17 (feed my sheep) ◦Luke 22:31–32 (Peter strengthens the brethren) ◦Isa 22:22 (type of the steward with keys) 2. Mariology ◦Luke 1:28 (full of grace) ◦Luke 1:42–48 (blessed among women, all generations will call her blessed) ◦Gen 3:15 (enmity with serpent) ◦ Wisdom 2:12–20, Tobit 12:12–15 ◦Rev 12 (woman clothed with sun) 3. Purgatory ◦2 Macc 12:38–46 (prayers/sacrifices for the dead) ◦1 Cor 3:11–15 (saved as through fire and ur works tested for purity) ◦Matt 5:25–26 (pay last penny) ◦Matt 12:32 (forgiveness in age to come) 4. Indulgences ◦this is from the Church’s power to bind & loose (Matt 16:19; 18:18) and applying Christ’s merits & treasury of the saints (Heb 12:1, Rev 5:8). 5. Prayers to the dead (intercession of saints) ◦Rev 5:8 & 8:3–4 (saints/elders offer prayers of the faithful) ◦Heb 12:1 (cloud of witnesses) ◦Tobit 12:12–15 (Angel Raphael presents prayers) 6. Infant Baptism ◦Acts 2:38–39 (promise to you and your children) ◦Col 2:11–12 (baptism is the new circumcision since it was applied to infants in the OT) ◦household baptisms (Acts 16:15, 33, 1 Cor 1:16) 7. Calling priests “Father” ◦1 Cor 4:15 (Paul said “I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel”) ◦1 Thess 2:11, Philem 10 ◦pls note that Jesus forbids the hypocritical use (Matt 23:9) not the spiritual fatherhood. 8. Clerical celibacy ◦this is not a dogma but a discipline ◦Scriptural precedent set in Matt 19:12 (eunuchs for the kingdom) and Cor 7:32–35 (undivided devotion), and by the boss, Jesus. 9. Christians losing salvation ◦in scripture in several places, Heb 6:4–6; 10:26–31, 2 Pet 2:20–22, Rev 3:5 (name blotted out), Matt 24:13. 10. Salvation through sacraments, obedience & charity ◦in scripture in several places, John 3:5 (born of water & Spirit), Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, Titus 3:5, James 2:24 (justified by works not faith alone), Matt 25:31–46 (judged by charity).

CATHOLIC MAXIMUS

13,449 views • 4 months ago

Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) by hand ✍️ ~ 9 steps walkthrough below The Gen in GenAI came from this landmark paper by Ian Goodfellow et al., 12 years ago. The paper showed that a neural network can not only classify but also turn upside down to generate realistic looking images. The secret? We pit two of them against each other: a Generator turns noise into fake data, and a Discriminator learns to tell fake from real, pushing the Generator to keep doing better. One runs upside down, the other right way up. I drew and calculated one entirely by hand. Goal: generate realistic 4D data out of 2D noise, filling in every cell yourself. = 1. Given = Four noise vectors in 2D, and four real data vectors in 4D. = 2. Generator, first layer = Let us multiply the noise by weights and biases to get new features. = 3. ReLU = We apply the activation, and -1 and -2 are crossed out and set to 0. = 4. Generator, second layer = Let us multiply again. ReLU applies here too, but every value is already positive, so nothing changes. What comes out is the fake data F, made by a two-layer generator out of nothing but noise. = 5. Discriminator, first layer = We feed it both, the four fakes and the four real vectors, through the same weights. It never learns which is which from the layout, only from the numbers. = 6. Discriminator, second layer = Let us reduce each data vector to a single feature Z. Eight vectors in, eight numbers out. = 7. Sigmoid = We turn each Z into a probability Y. A 1 means the discriminator is certain the data is real, a 0 means certain it is fake. = 8. Training the Discriminator = Let us take the gradients as Y minus YD, where YD is what the discriminator should have said: 0 for the four fakes, 1 for the four real. Why so simple? Because pairing sigmoid with binary cross entropy loss makes the math collapse to exactly this subtraction. Its loss uses both halves of the page. = 9. Training the Generator = We do it again, as Y minus YG, and YG is [1, 1, 1, 1]: the generator wants the discriminator to call every fake real. Same predictions, different target, opposite goal. Its loss uses only the fakes. The outputs: Fake data F = [1, 2, 3, 1], [1, 1, 2, 1], [2, 2, 4, 2], [1, 0, 1, 1] Predictions on fakes = [.7, .5, .9, .3] Predictions on real = [.7, .9, .9, 1] Discriminator gradients = [.7, .5, .9, .3] and [-.3, -.1, -.1, 0] Generator gradients = [-.3, -.5, -.1, -.7] The takeaway: the adversarial part is one subtraction done twice. The same eight predictions, scored against two opposite targets, send one set of gradients back through the blue weights and another back through the green ones. 💾 Save this post!

Tom Yeh

16,566 views • 12 days ago