Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

FDA-approved since 1955, hydroxychloroquine was safe, effective, and widely used for decades. But in 2020, it was suddenly labeled ‘dangerous.’ Why? Because Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the vaccine required that no alternative treatments exist. Big Pharma needed HCQ gone. The truth is undeniable.

861,012 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Stop Socialist Tyranny's profile picture
Stop Socialist Tyranny1 year ago

Dr Simone Gold is spot on, big pharma has too much influence over our healthcare system and it's time we take a stand against their greed. The fact that hydroxychloroquine was suddenly labeled 'dangerous' after being safely used for decades is a clear example of how EUA can be manipulated to benefit vaccine manufacturers. We need to support doctors like Dr Gold who are brave enough to speak out against the corruption in our healthcare system and fight for medical freedom.

STAT's profile picture
STAT1 year ago

When patents for name brand medicines expire, the price of that medicine drops significantly as generic versions enter the market, but that process can take a while. Watch a new video in STAT's 'Behind the Counter' series:

Scott Donnell's profile picture
Scott Donnell1 year ago

This is the single most refutable directive by the CDC, I will nerve believe another thing the CDC says. HCQ/IM eliminated my minimal COVID symptoms within a week. Never again will I believe the government.

FireIn8's profile picture
FireIn81 year ago

HCQ saved my life in 2021. Thankful for America's Frontline Doctors. Thankful for independent, mom & pop pharmacists

tX James G's profile picture
tX James G1 year ago

Every soldier deployed to a malaria prone region had taken this medicine.. it was 100% POLITICS! And the dems/media were willing to sacrifice our lives over it. I can't say fvck them enough.

Biggus Covfefes's profile picture
Biggus Covfefes1 year ago

Vaccines were an afterthought. The left were vilifying HCQ before vaccines even came along. Why? Because they wanted deaths to put teeth in the Covid scare. The reaction to the wuhan virus was the biggest psychological warfare operation in human history brought to us by the democrat party and the CCP.

Oh my Gatos!'s profile picture
Oh my Gatos!1 year ago

Indeed, it was known then and is known now, at least to those who were paying attention. But we were labeled Conspiracy Theorists and banned from social media for trying to tell others about this. Just awful…

David Mac's profile picture
David Mac1 year ago

This is absolutely TRUE. We saw this exact interference happening in real time. NEVER AGAIN @RobertKennedyJr @realDonaldTrump @SenJohnKennedy @BillCassidy @RepJuliaLetlow both for Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. Look at this, @elonmusk , is X still suppressing info on these?

Daniel Sinclair's profile picture
Daniel Sinclair1 year ago

This is completely false

NO MASK's profile picture
NO MASK1 year ago

It should be over the counter.

Kaizen's profile picture
Kaizen1 year ago

I hope you were sounding the alarm about this 3-4 years ago like other brave doctors who were putting their medical licenses on the line to save people. If it weren't for @PierreKory and the FLCCC speaking out about this early on, I could have been mindfcked into making a terrible choice.

Related Videos

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones. At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight. Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution. But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved. This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?

Camus

1,090,959 views • 9 months ago