Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Feb 2024 - A startling exchange in a Tennessee legislative hearing has exposed a looming frontier in pharmaceutical delivery: edible vaccines hidden in everyday produce. Lawmakers grilled officials on the consumer safety nightmare of unlabeled vaccines in lettuce and tomatoes. The testimony revealed that universities, including UC Riverside and...

44,852 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration

Wall Street Apes

473,423 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 They Are Planning On Force Medicating You Through Your Food. This Is Not A Conspiracy Theory, This Is 100% Real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this. Guys, this is cause and diet suddenly and by the way we know now i've got a paper talking about using milk ingestible we've got ingestible one of the things that everybody said well you know it'll break down in the stomach it won't matter that's not true i've got the science i've got the papers i've got the documents they have developed mechanisms to get this through the digestive system we don't know what it works on entirely we don't know how we don't have all information but what i can say absolute certainty There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. So there you have it. I mean this is not conspiracy theory, y'all. We have to get up. We have to wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up. Ha ha ha. Alright, so you guys, make sure you share this video. Make sure you're contacting your congressman. If you live in another state and this is, make sure you send the bill that we have to your congressman and let them know, you guys, we have to get involved with these politics. We have to, we just have to, right? Because they're weaponizing the politics and we're just saying don't be involved in politics and don't talk about the politics. And that is really gonna put us in the trick bag. And I don't think you're gonna like where that ends up. in total, 100% tyranny, okay? And parents, please start parenting your children. Moms, please get back home with the kids. Everyone start trying to live off of one income, right? That's the only way we're gonna win, is if we take our families back, okay? Make sure if you guys are new around here, you hit that thumbs up, right? —Leave a comment down below if you even had any idea about any of this stuff, right? Comment down below” There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled The Bill DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED

Wall Street Apes

561,116 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.

Camus

14,485 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Beware...The Affordable Care Act Declares All Vaccines To Be 'Medical Biogenics.' Hospitalized, You Or Your Loved One Will Be Injected With Vaccines While In Surgery...While Under Anesthesia...Without Your Knowledge. Never Sign Any Form Agreeing To 'Receive Medical Biogenics.' Beware of 'informed consent' & know what you are signing... When people go to a hospital, a health care clinic, or a doctor’s office, they are almost always given a written informed consent form to sign prior to receiving medical treatment. In recent years, these consent forms have begun to include statements asking the patient to agree to receive biogenics/biologics. However, many people do not know what the term biogenics/biologics means. According To The US FDA...Examples Of What Is Considered A Biologic/Biogenic & Can Be Administered To You Without Your Knowledge: Monoclonal antibodies Growth factors Vaccines Allergenics Antitoxins Blood products, such as red blood cells or platelets Botox Gene therapies Hormone replacement therapy Immunotherapy Recombinant proteins, such as insulin Stem cell therapies T-cell therapies Vaccines are biologics/biogenics, but new consent forms do not explicitly state this. If you provide your consent for you or your family member to receive biologics/biogenics in a hospital, doctor’s office or other facility that administers pharmaceutical products, you are giving medical personnel permission to administer any vaccines they deem necessary while you are under their care. If you’ve consented to biologics/biogenics and it is “flu season,” for example & you are receiving medical care, you may be given the influenza vaccine without specifically being asked or informed beforehand, even if you happen to be under anesthesia. If you do not want vaccines to be given to you, your child or a family member who has entrusted you with making medical decisions for them, you have the legal right to sign a statement on the written consent form refusing any type of vaccine. The concept of medical informed consent stems from the ethical principle of autonomy & patients have the legal right to be fully informed about the benefits, risks & failures of a physician-recommended medical procedure prior to making an informed & voluntary decision about whether or not to accept the risks. Like freedom of thought, speech, conscience & religious belief, informed consent to medical risk taking is recognized internationally as a human right. No one, including your physician, has the right to coerce you into agreeing to a medical intervention, such as vaccination, which could result in injury or death. You have the legal right to exercise informed consent by carefully reading written informed consent forms prior to any medical procedure, including receipt of biologics/biogenics (vaccines). Informed consent is protection against violation of human rights in the medical system. 👇Biologics & Biogenics In The Medical World👇 👇What Are Biologics/Biogenics Products👇 👇Innovation Policy & Market For Vaccines👇 Video: uncovering_hidden_truths

Valerie Anne Smith

274,761 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines” They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES Kamala Harris Administration has been using US Tax Payer money to fund the development “Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic edible vaccine sound far-fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside, funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic edible vaccine.” “One associate professor at UCR explained that, ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person.” “We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea.” “I don't think the American people should be funding this.” — “These transgenic edible plant vaccines, are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock.” “They're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA.” “I think we need a safe food supply. This is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, the pollen could spread, and we don't know what could happen.”

Wall Street Apes

2,434,825 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A Doctor's Public Apology Exposes Systemic Failures in Vaccine Education & Practice In a raw and emotional account, Dr. Daniel Neides, an educator affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic and Case Western Reserve University, issued a stunning public apology to his former patients. His confession reveals profound, systemic gaps in how the medical establishment handles vaccines, moving beyond anecdotal fears to indict the very structure of medical training and practice. His key points are a damning indictment: 1. The Educational Vacuum: Medical students are not educated on vaccine contents, safety data, or informed consent. They are taught to memorize the schedule, not to critically understand the science or the history, including the 1986 law that removed liability from pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries. 2. The Hidden Payouts: The medical community openly discusses the schedule but remains silent on the nearly $4 BILLION paid out to vaccine-injured patients since 1992 through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—a fact he was never taught. 3. Financial Conflicts & Patient Dismissal: He highlights the ethical crisis of potential payments to providers for high vaccination rates. Worse, patients who question vaccine safety or choose to delay are often "terminated" from their medical practices—a practice he calls "deplorable and disgusting." 4. Coercion Over Consent: The forcing of flu vaccines under threat of job loss, even for employees months from retirement, underscores a culture of coercion that strips individuals of bodily autonomy. 5. The Informed Consent Farce: Dr. Neides admits he was part of the problem. He would administer vaccines first and provide the safety information sheet afterward. He was completely unaware the sheets contained information about the injury compensation program—a critical failure in his duty of care. 6. The Gaslighting of the Injured: If a patient reports a penicillin allergy, it is immediately recorded and respected. But if a patient or parent reports a potential vaccine adverse event, they are met with skepticism and shame. This refusal to believe patients erodes the very foundation of the patient-doctor relationship. This isn't an anti-vaccine rant; it is a pro-transparency, pro-ethics, and pro-patient plea from within the system. It demands an answer: Why is robust, balanced education on vaccines—including their risks and the legal framework protecting their manufacturers—so conspicuously absent from medical training? The conversation must shift from blind enforcement to open, honest, and scientifically rigorous dialogue. The trust of the public depends on it.

Camus

64,318 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.

Camus

103,550 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

A defining warning was issued at the launch of Make Europe Healthy Again (MEHA) in Brussels. Dr. Beate Sibylle Pfeil, an independent researcher in human rights and law, delivered a powerful indictment against the World Health Organization, exposing a body that has catastrophically betrayed its founding mission. The WHO's influence is built on a myth of "expertise." The reality is an organization plagued by a blatant lack of transparency, arbitrariness, and deep-seated corruption. It is an entity open to control by the profit interests of a pharmaceutical donor lobby, all while operating without any independent oversight or legal review. This captured organization is now attempting to cement a global "pharmaceutical industrial complex" through new International Health Regulations—a framework where public safety and bodily integrity are clearly subordinate to profit. In a move that should alarm every citizen, the WHO, under the guise of combating "misinformation," is actively seeking to exclude reputable, dissenting science from public discourse. This is a direct assault on scientific freedom and open debate. As long as governments continue to legitimize the WHO as an objective body, the lives, health, and fundamental freedoms of people worldwide remain under acute threat. The vision championed by MEHA stands in stark opposition: a world founded on human dignity, freedom, and the inviolable principle of individual self-determination in health, including informed consent. The time to challenge and break the WHO's excessive power is now. It is the essential path to restoring health, sovereignty, and freedom in Europe.

Camus

37,334 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce