正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Fei-Fei Li on what simulation can do for robotics that real-world data can't: "You play out events that haven't happened, or cannot happen... And while you play it out, you learn how to act in it." "That's really important in robotics, because we cannot possibly have enough real-world data...

35,794 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Oleg Bilozor 的头像
Oleg Bilozor3 个月前

The thing that gets me is 'events that cannot happen.' You're not just filling data gaps, you're training on physics edge cases that would take decades to encounter in the real world, if they ever happened at all.

sindikitil 的头像
sindikitil3 个月前

Simulation lets you stress-edge cases that'd take decades to hit in meatspace. The long-tail distribution problem.

Winston B. 的头像
Winston B.3 个月前

Billions of hours of simulation only matter if they're the scenarios that almost never happen on real roads, the ones that decide whether a policy holds up under pressure. Same case for robotics generally. The data you need most is the data you'd otherwise wait years to collect naturally, so simulation ends up being the only practical way to get it.

踏空 Sidelined Capital 的头像
踏空 Sidelined Capital3 个月前

The expensive part is deciding which impossible events teach robustness and which teach the robot to exploit a simulator bug.

Bobby 的头像
Bobby3 个月前

Semper Fidelis

Fred Almeida 的头像
Fred Almeida3 个月前

I was doing this in 2016. Nothing new. We were even coding at the kernal level to improve the number of simulations. in 2017 we were at 12x the speed of 2016. We thought everyone was doing this (imposter syndrome sucks) but they weren't. Today we can train in an hour (constrained RL + SP + CL) what would take 1000 years in real world data. Even at the edge of the technology. People still don't understand this. Almost everyone that thinks they understand AI but haven't worked in it for the last 15 years will have a hard time understanding the foundations.

Ted | unfair.so 的头像
Ted | unfair.so3 个月前

training robots by building worlds = minecraft

PromptKing | Evidence & Integrity for Agentic AI 的头像
PromptKing | Evidence & Integrity for Agentic AI3 个月前

The same logic applies to agent governance. You cannot wait for the model swap, the budget breach, or the unauthorized escalation to discover whether the boundary held. You have to play the trajectory out first — under the actual policy — before the work is allowed to run. That’s why simulate-before-enforce exists. The events that would break the proof are the ones you must never let happen for real. One outcome. Many models. One law. One proof.

Our Ascent Live 的头像
Our Ascent Live3 个月前

The future of robotics should not only be technically intelligent @drfeifei. It should be publicly shaped. Citizen-led. AI-enhanced. 📡🗽

相关视频

Today at Stanford, Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li),Cofounder/CEO World Labs, gave one of the clearest explanations I’ve heard of what a World Model really is. She broke it down into three layers: 1️⃣ Rendering — What does the world look like? This is where most of today’s video generation models operate: generating increasingly realistic and beautiful pixels. The question is: Can AI generate what the world looks like? The primary consumer is humans. 2️⃣ Simulation — How does the world actually work? Fei-Fei gave a simple example: “How will this bottle move? If I pour the water out, how will the water flow?” This goes far beyond generating something that looks realistic. The model needs to understand physics, spatial relationships, cause and effect, and how the world changes over time. The consumers are both humans and machines. 3️⃣ Planning — What should happen next? This is where things get really interesting. AI doesn't just render the world or simulate what might happen. It uses its understanding of the world to decide: What should I do next? At this layer, the primary consumer is the machine itself. And this connects directly to two enormous opportunities: Autonomous driving and robotics. The progression is powerful: Rendering → Simulation → Planning The real promise of World Models isn't simply generating better videos. It's building AI that can understand the world, predict what happens next, and ultimately take intelligent action in the physical world.

PaulFang

12,066 次观看 • 3 个月前

Old footage sitting in your camera roll could now be reconstructable as a 3D scene. World Labs co-founders Ben Mildenhall and Fei-Fei Li on how Atlas got there: Ben: "In a casual sense... I took three photos of this object, or six photos of this room. I look at the photos, I can understand in my mind how those piece together. I can fill in the gaps and get it." "But there's never really been any reconciliation between those data-driven priors and the brute force dense reconstruction, which is much more akin to scientific or medical imaging... When we say dense, we really mean dense." "This room, I want like 100, 200, 300 photos to capture it. And what we're trying to do is bring that down to like three. We're saying like 50, 100x reduction." "At that scale it completely flips that calculus on its head of what type of captures you reconstruct. You can go back to existing imagery you have. You can go to stuff you find on the internet and even build scenes out of that. You can go to casual videos and unearth a lot of footage that in the past we would never have treated as reconstructable, and bring it to life as 3D." "This is something we've been playing around with a lot with Atlas. Taking old clips. I've taken a bunch of my own old captures that never worked before and put them through the system and seen a reconstruction for the first time." Fei-Fei: "The Stanford demo is underappreciated. Anywhere between 3 to 25 images, you can reconstruct that entire Stanford quad... Everything you see is generated, but according to the laws of reconstruction. And this is really magical." Ben Mildenhall Fei-Fei Li

a16z

49,207 次观看 • 2 个月前