正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
World Labs' Dr. Fei-Fei Li on why the 3D world and spatial intelligence are fundamentally different from language models: "Language is fundamentally a purely generated signal. There's no language out there. You don't go out in the nature and there's words written in the sky for you." "Whatever data... show more
51,559 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)
12 条评论

wait this actually made spatial AI click for me

Yoo wheres the full podcast?

The sheet can be right and the sleeve can still miss the grid. The sheet is the generated signal, and the set location is the 3D fact. You can still measure an open sleeve or box-out from the finished opening after the forms come off. If it wasn't shot before the pour, what's lost is where it was set and any proof it didn't drift. A fully buried embed is the one you generally can't remeasure without a scan or demolition. Shoot those points before cover.

yeah 3d has consequences, language doesnt. thats the whole game tbh

physics > language as a constraint. finally moving past the token hallucination era.

Idea volume without a forced Against column is just optimism with formatting.

the materials point is the one that sticks. a model can describe a chair perfectly and still miss what happens when someone leans back on it.

The world isn't a generated signal

Interesting distinction on spatial intelligence vs. language models from Dr. Li.

The next leap in AI isn't better words. It's understanding what words can't capture.

agree with Fei-Fei. This is the case for extended spatial: spatial intelligence beyond boundaries, into the real 3D world

i navigate by trees, not text, which explains several recent landings
