Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Felt this needed to be said. #lindsayclancycase #trialcoverage #independentreporting #independentjournalism #lindsayclancytrial
16,646 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)
32 Comments

It’s easy she fucking admitted to doing it. She’s guilty.

I don’t care about “our justice system”. Society goes off the rails all the time. I care about these kids that were strangled to death by the one person in the world that was supposed to protect them. All murderers are mental. They need to be removed from society for the rest of their days.

The entire case was about her mental state and whether she was criminally responsible due to psychosis! She literally admits she killed the kid’s BUT denies she’s responsible because of psychosis! “Under Massachusetts law, a trial focuses on whether the prosecution can prove criminal responsibility, not just whether the person committed the act. Because Lindsay Clancy’s defense team openly conceded that she killed her three children, the entire legal battle centered on her mental state at the time of the offense. The Defense (Lack of Criminal Responsibility): Her attorney argued that Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis, a rare and profound mental illness. Because of this condition, they argued she lacked the capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or conform her behavior to the law (the insanity defense). Therefore, she pleaded not guilty to the murder charges. [1] ( [2] ( [3] ( [4] ( [5] ( The Prosecution (Criminally Responsible): Prosecutors did not have to prove who killed the children, as that was undisputed. Instead, they bore the heavy burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was sane and criminally responsible. They argued she meticulously planned the killings by sending her husband out on a timed errand, showing she knew right from wrong.” [1] ( [2] ( [3] ( [4] ( [5] (

Lindsay’s counsel stipulated to the court that she killed her children, meaning the Commonwealth did not have to prove she did it. This trial was about whether she was legally responsible for what she did or not. That’s why there was no forensic or other evidence presented.

All i hear is " I want a pathway to not be held accountable for my shitty behavior in the future "

Massachusetts is in the minority of states regarding the burden of proof relating to insanity. The law is obviously and morally unjust, and thus we have a duty to disobey it.

Let me stop you right there real quick. Lindsay IS guilty. Continue.

She methodically planned the timing and method. She created a window where no one would be home to stop her. And interviewed with psychiatrist, Stafford happens, she volunteered that she did it. She's guilty

Can someone tag Trump here and remind him that it’s “innocent until proven guilty”? Does the President know how the law works?

Funny …. 90% of the outraged are misogynistic pigs Most of the “rage” has been from men who apparently just wait salivating for an opportunity to bash women or deny their Rights

Now do the Civil lawsuit she filed and what it states as to why it exists.

@sdgagape @karolineleavitt @SecRubio @realDonaldTrump stop commenting on what the world wants to hear and focus on the evidence at hand. Clearly the husband is hiding something

#RepealThe19th

See but I'm seeing the same ppl insisting that we trust the Charlie Kirk case also wanting Lindsay Clancy hanged.

@KatieMiller @megynkelly @zackpeter @NancyGrace @AveryDaye @TheJadeWarwick @clerpatriot @NancyMace I am looking at all of you and side eyed all of your apparently independent hot takes which follow the TP USA narrative and are aligned. Weird coincidence

SHE FUCKING ADMITTED TO IT YOU BRAIN DEAD CUNT

Men for Lindsay Clancy.

To reinforce what you said and for those who didn’t bother to watch the trial, listen to the judge.

Patrick got away with what Chris Watts tried to do but failed.

Girl I just fell in love 😍😍😍😍 thank you for saying everything I’ve been screaming in writing so well 😭😭

Thank you for your time with this. Could you speak to the "admission" she killed the kids that has been widely reported? I'm trying to catch up on all of the angles.

THIS

Well done

They told us this is not white privilege because other Black women were sent to the psych ward for killing their children, and she deserves the same. Are you telling me she can be in starbucks next week?

No lol. Her charges are still pending. Nothing has been dropped. And she is still being held without bail in a mental facility. She cannot "just go to Starbucks". If she received a straight not guilty, she would have been acquitted.

Reddington should be disbarred for accusing a juror of committing a felony in open court because of a note. That note could have been a lie. That’s really what I care about in terms of the law at this point. It was disgraceful.

Fuck that…those babies were murdered. Fuck you!

Accountability really is kryptonite to you women, so I have a question for you defending the m*rderer, and every other woman supporting the m*rder of those young children. Let’s say you have a young toddler, the same age as one of Lindsay’s children. Your nanny has just had a child herself and resumed work with you months after childbirth, but still within the timeframe in which she could potentially suffer from PPD. One day, you step out for a quick errand, only to return and discover that your nanny has m*rdered your kids in cold bl**d. Would you accept her plea of PPD as an excuse? Would you suddenly believe that she shouldn’t be held accountable because she had just given birth and was suffering from a mental health condition? Or would you expect justice for your child?

Been screaming the same thing! I feel like I am caught in some twilight zone episode and praying for the conclusion!

I think they didn’t even think about that according to the jurors !!! They said all they were trying to figure out was she or not NGRI so I’m more confused now more then ever!!

Crazy how confidently you spew bullshit lol Straight not guilty is ALWAYS available in a trial. That’s just how the law works. But when the defense is not contesting a fact that the prosecution presents (in this case that she did kill her kids), the jury doesn’t get to then come

She killed these babies - after watching the trial I would have stuck with 1st degree murder! The defense did not sell the psychosis to me! Say their names! Cora, Dawson and Callan!
