Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Feminists are like Schrödinger’s cat.
732,994 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)
47 Comments

And they ask me why my content is focused on women's behaviour 🤭

In my lifetime I have never seen a more based and accurate description of the situation the world finds itself in today.

🙏🏻

It's funny to see the squadron come to attack you on the physique or on the script but he doesn't attack the content of the message because they have no argument to counter it 😄

They only do it because they perceive being trans as humiliating and inherently degrading, but they won’t say it openly. Women usually try to lower other women’s status, attractiveness, or reputation. It’s the weapons they developed as opposed to physical aggression.

It's significantly worse than that, because if a woman chooses of her own agency to be something that modern feminism views as a traditional role, they have to attack her treat her like a traitor attack the role that she chose. If she's happy in that role they have to make her miserable. That would be like if Schrodinger's cat survived the poison came out of the box & Schrodinger stabbed the cat, to prove the concept...

🎯 You just have to look at my comments to confirm this. They perceive me to be a ‘trad wife’ (despite knowing nothing about me personally), and leave the most vile and unhinged comments. So much for giving women ‘the choice’, only when you choose what they want.

Well said

😂

Former super fat guy here. The second i realized my weight was my fault was the second i took control of my weight loss. It’s hard for a culture that avoids accountability to shame the bad behavior that leads to its destruction.

Taking control of your health is badass 💪🏻 I had my come to Jesus moment on feminism in my early 20’s and realised I was the problem 😂

Accountability is powerful

Schrödinger’s Manospherian. Men are simultaneously unshakable alphas & oppressed by the gynocracy.

Some people are allergic to accountability regardless of their sex, race, or nationality.

This is called the "free rider" problem or demanding power without accountability. One group is expected to play by the rules of strict equality, while the other group retains the right to opt into traditional privileges whenever it suits them.

There’s been a term for this in psychology for a long time: the self-serving bias.

You know…I love it when I learn things. Now if I get into an argument with a woman over something stupid, I’ll just call her a Schrödinger cat muppet.

"What do we call a woman that lives on her own, works, pays her bills and maintains a home? A strong, independent woman! What do we call a man that does the same thing? He is just a dude."

women are simultaneously too powerful to be trusted and too inferior to be respected. The Madonna whore rebranded.

Does she have a discussion on men? I mean, if she is serious about convenient ideolgy, there is a whole histiry of patriachy she can unpack🤡

Exactly. Unfortunately this pattern of thought extends well beyond “pathological feminism” and into most far left ideology. Reality is dependent on their perspective; it is just a tool to argue for selfish desire.

I saw a post about this with the exact same points a couple of days back. Unoriginal contribution delivered with so much confidence, and performed outrage really sells it. Next time, have an original thought or something.

LOL 1) I do my own scripts based on research and not other people’s content 2) The topic isn’t unique to me and the definitions, historical context and sources are available for everyone which means 3) There will be overlap in concepts by different creators. You know what was truly unoriginal and really contributed nothing? Your comment 🤗

Occam's razor says if you regurgitate someone else post 80% of the way, its unlikely to be original. But hey rare coincidences happen. Also, interesting that people have accused you of being unoriginal before. Must be indicative of something.

1) I’ve found videos of creators who are almost identical to mine and had never heard of me 2) Now it’s not ‘identical’ but down to 80% 😂 3) An accusation isn’t truth, and of the THOUSANDS of comments I get, this is the first time someone says I copied someone’s content. I’d be happy to credit a creator for inspiration , but contrary to your assertion, it isn’t the case here (I don’t even know the other video you’re referring to). Seems like the idea of a popular concept, with the same historical context and sources producing similar content is foreign to you 🤭

Is it any surprise. The whole schtick of Pickmeism and picking on feminism is unoriginal. Reinforce whats in power, pander to what men already say, agree with whats already status quo.

'Sex Worker' while the money's good. 'Trafficking Victim' when its not anymore.

The Feminist motto, “Equal when it’s due but preferential treatment when it’s required.”

According to Schrödinger’s feminism, a pre-born baby is a precious child if the mother desires it, and a worthless clump of cells if she does not.

Totally detached from reality

Yep, that one’s getting tagged for the “Legendary” Bookmarks folder.

It's not a bug, it's the intended result. It's the entire framework of the ideology.

Dude I lowkey thought u were a masc. Nothing wrong with that it’s a beautiful thing but just thought!

GTFO with your mental illness

Sorry touched a nerve there

LOL it’s ok, you need therapy

Can u be my therapist mommy

@MISSKENSINGTON It is painful to see when people try to attack somebody online and fail so miserably.

@MISSKENSINGTON I wasn’t trying to attack her. I’m crying rn cuz of you

It’s toxic narcissism

Sounds a lot like identity politics for anything nowadays, which, is always leftists.

Well said... Guys? We knew this, right?

Brilliant

Brilliant. Well spoken.

Brilliant!!!

Modern women are Demanding equal treatment but not when it comes to accountability. Preferential treatment there.

Women are autonomous adults in a society that makes life more difficult for them has been their claim for a long time now. I’m against feminists, that explanation seems coherent and they’ve consistently said it? I prefer more fundamental flaws with their claims and goals.
