Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Figma CEO Dylan Field warns creatives against "quietly surrendering" to AI — when AI tools narrow the scope of your creative process and end up controlling the direction of your creative output "Right now, there's almost like this quiet surrender, as our CPO Yuhki Yamashita put it the other...

43,013 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

5 Yorum

armand type beat profil fotoğrafı
armand type beat1 ay önce

@zoink @yuhkiyam Figma is an app I used nearly every day, to only a few times in one year, to now being absolutely essential once again the buy is obvious

Clayo profil fotoğrafı
Clayo1 ay önce

@zoink @yuhkiyam I canceled my Adobe subscription I've had for 14 years for Figma. Clear leader now more than ever. Buying more $FIG in the low 20s.

Artem Vakhrushev profil fotoğrafı
Artem Vakhrushev1 ay önce

@zoink @yuhkiyam The real problem isn’t that AI convinces people. It’s that people already half-wanted to give up the wheel and AI just offered a nicer seat. It’s powerful. It’s also a very eloquent shadow with zero skin in the game and excellent posture.

Marley Bowman profil fotoğrafı
Marley Bowman1 ay önce

@zoink @yuhkiyam Resisting AI won't stop it. The real question is how to actively shape it as a tool rather than a threat. Where do you draw the line between enhancement and surrender?

name can't be blank profil fotoğrafı
name can't be blank1 ay önce

@zoink @yuhkiyam I would not buy this guys companys stock. This is not to say he doesn't make some good points, and I'm sympathetic to those points. Run from his stock though

Benzer Videolar

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

The All-In Podcast

301,207 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce