Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Figma CEO Dylan Field warns creatives against "quietly surrendering" to AI — when AI tools narrow the scope of your creative process and end up controlling the direction of your creative output "Right now, there's almost like this quiet surrender, as our CPO Yuhki Yamashita put it the other...

tbpn's profile picture

TBPN

1,547,646 subscribers

43,013 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 5

Фото профиля armand type beat
armand type beat1 месяц назад

@zoink @yuhkiyam Figma is an app I used nearly every day, to only a few times in one year, to now being absolutely essential once again the buy is obvious

Фото профиля Clayo
Clayo1 месяц назад

@zoink @yuhkiyam I canceled my Adobe subscription I've had for 14 years for Figma. Clear leader now more than ever. Buying more $FIG in the low 20s.

Фото профиля Artem Vakhrushev
Artem Vakhrushev1 месяц назад

@zoink @yuhkiyam The real problem isn’t that AI convinces people. It’s that people already half-wanted to give up the wheel and AI just offered a nicer seat. It’s powerful. It’s also a very eloquent shadow with zero skin in the game and excellent posture.

Фото профиля Marley Bowman
Marley Bowman1 месяц назад

@zoink @yuhkiyam Resisting AI won't stop it. The real question is how to actively shape it as a tool rather than a threat. Where do you draw the line between enhancement and surrender?

Фото профиля name can't be blank
name can't be blank1 месяц назад

@zoink @yuhkiyam I would not buy this guys companys stock. This is not to say he doesn't make some good points, and I'm sympathetic to those points. Run from his stock though

Похожие видео

$FIG CEO Dylan Field describes the AI psychosis he's been seeing among engineers lately: "It feels like there's a lot of tunnel vision right now. Especially for engineers." "[People] get very latched on to an idea. Then the AI psychosis sets in. And you're like, 'This is the best idea ever.' And you're fully tunnel-visioned towards creating it." "And you can show massive progress. But are you going in the right direction?" "I think it's really important to steer, and to actually be building what you need to build. And to think — not just wear a thinking cap."
0:57

$FIG CEO Dylan Field describes the AI psychosis he's been seeing among engineers lately: "It feels like there's a lot of tunnel vision right now. Especially for engineers." "[People] get very latched on to an idea. Then the AI psychosis sets in. And you're like, 'This is the best idea ever.' And you're fully tunnel-visioned towards creating it." "And you can show massive progress. But are you going in the right direction?" "I think it's really important to steer, and to actually be building what you need to build. And to think — not just wear a thinking cap."

TBPN

48,758 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

There’s no one right way to create content. Some creators want AI to handle more of the work and make the process as fast and simple as possible. Others want to stay hands-on, make their own creative decisions, and use AI only when it actually helps. That’s what makes Zero-Edit on the new Insta360 X6 interesting to me. It’s not about replacing creators with AI. It’s about giving creators control over how much AI assistance they want. Whether you want a more automated workflow or prefer a semi-assisted process where you stay in control, Zero-Edit can adapt to your creative style. The hardest part of creating content isn’t always shooting. It’s what comes after. You can spend hours filming and end up with dozens of clips. Then you have to go through everything, find the best moments, edit them, and finally get the content ready to post. That’s where AI Director can help find the best moments from your footage, so you don’t have to watch every clip yourself. For creators, this means less time sorting through footage and more time actually creating. Shoot → find the best moments → edit → share. AI that supports your creativity without taking control of it. #Insta360 #Insta360X6 #AI #ContentCreation #CreatorEconomy #VideoEditing
0:34

There’s no one right way to create content. Some creators want AI to handle more of the work and make the process as fast and simple as possible. Others want to stay hands-on, make their own creative decisions, and use AI only when it actually helps. That’s what makes Zero-Edit on the new Insta360 X6 interesting to me. It’s not about replacing creators with AI. It’s about giving creators control over how much AI assistance they want. Whether you want a more automated workflow or prefer a semi-assisted process where you stay in control, Zero-Edit can adapt to your creative style. The hardest part of creating content isn’t always shooting. It’s what comes after. You can spend hours filming and end up with dozens of clips. Then you have to go through everything, find the best moments, edit them, and finally get the content ready to post. That’s where AI Director can help find the best moments from your footage, so you don’t have to watch every clip yourself. For creators, this means less time sorting through footage and more time actually creating. Shoot → find the best moments → edit → share. AI that supports your creativity without taking control of it. #Insta360 #Insta360X6 #AI #ContentCreation #CreatorEconomy #VideoEditing

Markandey Sharma

167,342 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

LinkedIn just started hiding AI-written posts. And their system catches them 94 percent of the time. But the answer is NOT to stop using AI. They announced this in May. If your post sounds like everyone else's, it doesn't get deleted. It just stops spreading. Your followers see it. Nobody new ever does. They're even flagging the way AI writes. Sentences like "it's not this, it's that"? Flagged. But most people missed one line in that announcement: using AI to HELP you write is totally fine. You just have to make it sound like you. Here are 2 things you can do: One, give your AI your own stuff. Upload your old posts, your client results, your stories, your data, your transcripts. Now instead of pulling generic advice off the internet, it's writing from YOUR experience. In your voice. Two, write about what people care about RIGHT NOW. I check AnswerThePublic to see the exact questions my audience is typing in this week then I write about those. The more you sound like yourself and talk about real problems people face, the more people will want to hear what you have to say.
1:02

LinkedIn just started hiding AI-written posts. And their system catches them 94 percent of the time. But the answer is NOT to stop using AI. They announced this in May. If your post sounds like everyone else's, it doesn't get deleted. It just stops spreading. Your followers see it. Nobody new ever does. They're even flagging the way AI writes. Sentences like "it's not this, it's that"? Flagged. But most people missed one line in that announcement: using AI to HELP you write is totally fine. You just have to make it sound like you. Here are 2 things you can do: One, give your AI your own stuff. Upload your old posts, your client results, your stories, your data, your transcripts. Now instead of pulling generic advice off the internet, it's writing from YOUR experience. In your voice. Two, write about what people care about RIGHT NOW. I check AnswerThePublic to see the exact questions my audience is typing in this week then I write about those. The more you sound like yourself and talk about real problems people face, the more people will want to hear what you have to say.

Neil Patel

12,378 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Charleston AI Founder James Reilly, who began helping the local Charleston community implement AI out of a brick-and-mortar storefront, says the company now serves a mix of consumers and enterprise customers. "It's a combination of both. Mostly they're SMBs so it's easy for them to adapt to it." "A lot of people would like [learn how to use AI], but they don't have time. They're so used to doing what they do and this is just not natural for them." "The other side of the coin are the people that have larger-sized businesses who are really into AI. Then they realize they're falling behind on their work and that's why they need us to come in and help them."
1:26

Charleston AI Founder James Reilly, who began helping the local Charleston community implement AI out of a brick-and-mortar storefront, says the company now serves a mix of consumers and enterprise customers. "It's a combination of both. Mostly they're SMBs so it's easy for them to adapt to it." "A lot of people would like [learn how to use AI], but they don't have time. They're so used to doing what they do and this is just not natural for them." "The other side of the coin are the people that have larger-sized businesses who are really into AI. Then they realize they're falling behind on their work and that's why they need us to come in and help them."

TBPN

46,291 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Naval on how to get a job in 2025: Learn how to use AI Naval on E215: "The fastest way to help somebody get a job right now: the best thing you can do is say, 'Hey, go download the AI tools and just start talking to them. Just start using them in any way.'" "And then you can walk into any employer in almost any field and say, 'Hey, I understand AI.' And they'll hire you on the spot." "AI is a productivity tool. It increases the productivity of a worker. It allows them to do more creative work and less repetitive work. As such, it makes them more valuable." "Yes, there is some retraining involved, but not a lot. These are natural language computers. You can talk to them in plain English, and they talk back to you in plain English." "I think we will see job creation by AI that will be as fast or faster than job destruction." "You saw this even with the internet. Like, YouTube came along. Look at all these YouTube streamers and influencers. That didn't used to be a job." "Go brush up on your AI. Learn a little bit. Watch a few videos. Use the AI." "Tinker with it and then go reapply for that job that rejected you, and watch how they pull you in."
0:50

Naval on how to get a job in 2025: Learn how to use AI Naval on E215: "The fastest way to help somebody get a job right now: the best thing you can do is say, 'Hey, go download the AI tools and just start talking to them. Just start using them in any way.'" "And then you can walk into any employer in almost any field and say, 'Hey, I understand AI.' And they'll hire you on the spot." "AI is a productivity tool. It increases the productivity of a worker. It allows them to do more creative work and less repetitive work. As such, it makes them more valuable." "Yes, there is some retraining involved, but not a lot. These are natural language computers. You can talk to them in plain English, and they talk back to you in plain English." "I think we will see job creation by AI that will be as fast or faster than job destruction." "You saw this even with the internet. Like, YouTube came along. Look at all these YouTube streamers and influencers. That didn't used to be a job." "Go brush up on your AI. Learn a little bit. Watch a few videos. Use the AI." "Tinker with it and then go reapply for that job that rejected you, and watch how they pull you in."

The All-In Podcast

164,054 просмотров • 1 год назад

Physicist steve hsu warns humanity may surrender power to AI completely voluntarily because the alternative is getting crushed by competitors who use it: "Gradual disempowerment, which I think people are intuitively aware of, but usually they've not seen it fully formulated this way." "Every single element of our society, whether you're a corporation, a military, a government, or even an individual trying to do well on the dating apps, if you have access to a superior intelligence, an AI, that you need to compete against all the other players, you're gonna start using that AI." "Gradually, even if nothing goes wrong, even if there's no evil AI or there's no AI hacking your systems, you literally are gonna surrender power to it because you will get better outcomes. If you don't surrender power to it, your competitors are gonna beat you. They're gonna crush you." "That's gradual disempowerment. It's gonna happen completely voluntarily as people just hand over power to AI."
0:58

Physicist steve hsu warns humanity may surrender power to AI completely voluntarily because the alternative is getting crushed by competitors who use it: "Gradual disempowerment, which I think people are intuitively aware of, but usually they've not seen it fully formulated this way." "Every single element of our society, whether you're a corporation, a military, a government, or even an individual trying to do well on the dating apps, if you have access to a superior intelligence, an AI, that you need to compete against all the other players, you're gonna start using that AI." "Gradually, even if nothing goes wrong, even if there's no evil AI or there's no AI hacking your systems, you literally are gonna surrender power to it because you will get better outcomes. If you don't surrender power to it, your competitors are gonna beat you. They're gonna crush you." "That's gradual disempowerment. It's gonna happen completely voluntarily as people just hand over power to AI."

MTS

12,442 просмотров • 15 дней назад

This is real-time.. The debate about Nvidia's latest neural rendering tech is ongoing. One side sees the potential of the technology to bridge the gap across the uncanny valley, to give us a much less rigid creative process than a to b to c.. the other side shouts "slop" and tries to shame any creative who dares to explore this new technology, any chance they get. Meanwhile, I'm over here saying "I told you so".. Gen Ai is here to stay, its becoming real-time and Nvidia now has the "RTX on" for AI which I've been talking about for years. We need creatives to help shape meaningful tools that combine this tech with much more granular creative control.. with tools where you as an artist see your creative thumbprint from beginning to end in the parts of the work that matters the most to you. If you're shaming artists or storytellers who embrace these tools, you're doing them a disservice in my opinion. If they don't learn to utilize these tools and workflows, to make them their own and to shape them, others will. There's no way this tech won't be a huge part of the creative industry and of the way we tell stories. It's happening around us as we speak. That said, at the core of it, do what makes you happy and create in any way you like. Don't let people tell you that "you can't do this" or "you have to do it like this".
0:36

This is real-time.. The debate about Nvidia's latest neural rendering tech is ongoing. One side sees the potential of the technology to bridge the gap across the uncanny valley, to give us a much less rigid creative process than a to b to c.. the other side shouts "slop" and tries to shame any creative who dares to explore this new technology, any chance they get. Meanwhile, I'm over here saying "I told you so".. Gen Ai is here to stay, its becoming real-time and Nvidia now has the "RTX on" for AI which I've been talking about for years. We need creatives to help shape meaningful tools that combine this tech with much more granular creative control.. with tools where you as an artist see your creative thumbprint from beginning to end in the parts of the work that matters the most to you. If you're shaming artists or storytellers who embrace these tools, you're doing them a disservice in my opinion. If they don't learn to utilize these tools and workflows, to make them their own and to shape them, others will. There's no way this tech won't be a huge part of the creative industry and of the way we tell stories. It's happening around us as we speak. That said, at the core of it, do what makes you happy and create in any way you like. Don't let people tell you that "you can't do this" or "you have to do it like this".

Martin Nebelong

43,165 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"
1:13

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

The All-In Podcast

301,207 просмотров • 1 год назад

Netflix opened up an attraction called “Netflix House” and you need to hear this “When you enter Netflix house, you give Netflix the right to you use your name, your likeness, and your voice in any use worldwide, forever, without compensation” This is real “When you go in and you read all the terms, when you walk in there, you're giving them everything. You're giving them your face, your, your movements, your identity, how you talk, how you walk, you're giving them everything. And you're giving them the right to AI generate you, and you're giving them the right to use all that in their content without compensating you whatsoever.” “Oh, and if you bring your child in there, you're also saying that it's okay for you, for, like, them to take your child's data, which is scary.” “So then I got to thinking, you know, why would they be doing this, right? Well, I live in New Jersey, and if you know, New Jersey is the home to the new Netflix, like, Hollywood Studio, essentially. And we know that Warner Brothers Netflix merge. Like, we know that there's a lot happening in the entertainment industry. They're going to need a lot more content to get put out. It's going to be AI generated. It's going to be us. You could not catch me dead walking in there dead.”
2:20

Netflix opened up an attraction called “Netflix House” and you need to hear this “When you enter Netflix house, you give Netflix the right to you use your name, your likeness, and your voice in any use worldwide, forever, without compensation” This is real “When you go in and you read all the terms, when you walk in there, you're giving them everything. You're giving them your face, your, your movements, your identity, how you talk, how you walk, you're giving them everything. And you're giving them the right to AI generate you, and you're giving them the right to use all that in their content without compensating you whatsoever.” “Oh, and if you bring your child in there, you're also saying that it's okay for you, for, like, them to take your child's data, which is scary.” “So then I got to thinking, you know, why would they be doing this, right? Well, I live in New Jersey, and if you know, New Jersey is the home to the new Netflix, like, Hollywood Studio, essentially. And we know that Warner Brothers Netflix merge. Like, we know that there's a lot happening in the entertainment industry. They're going to need a lot more content to get put out. It's going to be AI generated. It's going to be us. You could not catch me dead walking in there dead.”

Wall Street Apes

600,723 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

CONFIG: Dylan Field (aka Dylan Field), Founder & CEO of Figma says: "You have to actually think." "There's a world where a lot of people are letting AI think for them... & they're tricking themselves into believing they're thinking, themselves." "Especially when the AI is sycophantic & it's telling you you're so great, & you're such a genius, but then giving you what it wants to do.. that's no longer your idea. That's no longer your intention." "Use AI as a tool to learn, a tool to understand the world better, a tool for leverage to get the non-critical stuff done faster." Live from Config 2026, San Francisco
2:10

CONFIG: Dylan Field (aka Dylan Field), Founder & CEO of Figma says: "You have to actually think." "There's a world where a lot of people are letting AI think for them... & they're tricking themselves into believing they're thinking, themselves." "Especially when the AI is sycophantic & it's telling you you're so great, & you're such a genius, but then giving you what it wants to do.. that's no longer your idea. That's no longer your intention." "Use AI as a tool to learn, a tool to understand the world better, a tool for leverage to get the non-critical stuff done faster." Live from Config 2026, San Francisco

Molly O’Shea

107,645 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The danger of AI is not just the slop, but what we lose in the process. Michael Pollan explains: "We're moving into this time where we're gonna sub out writing to AI. And AI can write our papers, and professors are dealing with this everywhere now. But what is lost is a way of thinking. Writing does something to your brain. It gives you access to things you can't know just walking around or thinking or planning or outlining. If you were just transcribing what was in your head, it would be kind of onerous. But it really is what you learn in the course of a day spent writing, things you didn't know, ideas that you didn't expect. And that's the thrill of it."
1:20

The danger of AI is not just the slop, but what we lose in the process. Michael Pollan explains: "We're moving into this time where we're gonna sub out writing to AI. And AI can write our papers, and professors are dealing with this everywhere now. But what is lost is a way of thinking. Writing does something to your brain. It gives you access to things you can't know just walking around or thinking or planning or outlining. If you were just transcribing what was in your head, it would be kind of onerous. But it really is what you learn in the course of a day spent writing, things you didn't know, ideas that you didn't expect. And that's the thrill of it."

David Perell Clips

18,468 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

meet focus mode in ai studio. just point to the part of your app that you want to edit, and ai studio will update the stying instantly. the fastest way to make targeted edits to your UI.
0:31

meet focus mode in ai studio. just point to the part of your app that you want to edit, and ai studio will update the stying instantly. the fastest way to make targeted edits to your UI.

Google AI Studio

56,489 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 Elon Musk on xAI and Grok: "I came to realize that really there's two choices here, either be a spectator or or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI, but if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally true seeking AI with with good values, that loves humanity, and that's what we're trying to create with Grok. Grok was the only one that weighted human life equally. You want a curious truth seeking AI. And I think a curious truth seeking AI will want to foster humanity. As long as there's at least one AI that is maximally truth seeking, it will cause embarrassment for the other AIs, and then they improve. They tend to improve just in the same way that acquiring Twitter and allowing the truth to be told and not suppressing the truth forced the other social media companies to be more truthful in the same way, having Grok be a maximally truth seeking, curious AI will force the other AI companies to be more truth seeking and fair."
4:39

🚨 Elon Musk on xAI and Grok: "I came to realize that really there's two choices here, either be a spectator or or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI, but if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally true seeking AI with with good values, that loves humanity, and that's what we're trying to create with Grok. Grok was the only one that weighted human life equally. You want a curious truth seeking AI. And I think a curious truth seeking AI will want to foster humanity. As long as there's at least one AI that is maximally truth seeking, it will cause embarrassment for the other AIs, and then they improve. They tend to improve just in the same way that acquiring Twitter and allowing the truth to be told and not suppressing the truth forced the other social media companies to be more truthful in the same way, having Grok be a maximally truth seeking, curious AI will force the other AI companies to be more truth seeking and fair."

DogeDesigner

216,533 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

BOOM! NEW GROKPOD UPDATE! I just stabilized my new Firehose AI output system! Using my RSVP technology and GrokPod with my AI router selected my local AI model to weigh in. This is the most powerful way to get the most information with the least effort, absolutely nothing comes close. With GrokPod you will get voice in and out and voice in to RSVP out, as well as other mixtures. Other than hacking in to your brain, this is the only way to keep up with AI outputs. It is a super power I built into this garage project. In the specimen video below the AI router detected the subject matter the local AI would be far more qualified to answer as I have 1000s of never seen documents on it. (If you know you know). With my RSVP technology you do not need to waste time and energy moving your eyes or randomly scanning that in many cases loses your place. More soon as I add the audio effect that aids in retention. No one else building AI devices have a clue about this including OpenAI and Apple. You and I have a clue and this is only what I will make public. Most of it is below the water line. There is far more. Iceberg strait ahead… More soon! And thank you for all of your support and kind words.
0:36

BOOM! NEW GROKPOD UPDATE! I just stabilized my new Firehose AI output system! Using my RSVP technology and GrokPod with my AI router selected my local AI model to weigh in. This is the most powerful way to get the most information with the least effort, absolutely nothing comes close. With GrokPod you will get voice in and out and voice in to RSVP out, as well as other mixtures. Other than hacking in to your brain, this is the only way to keep up with AI outputs. It is a super power I built into this garage project. In the specimen video below the AI router detected the subject matter the local AI would be far more qualified to answer as I have 1000s of never seen documents on it. (If you know you know). With my RSVP technology you do not need to waste time and energy moving your eyes or randomly scanning that in many cases loses your place. More soon as I add the audio effect that aids in retention. No one else building AI devices have a clue about this including OpenAI and Apple. You and I have a clue and this is only what I will make public. Most of it is below the water line. There is far more. Iceberg strait ahead… More soon! And thank you for all of your support and kind words.

Brian Roemmele

62,527 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind: "some jobs will disappear, but better and more meaningful ones will take their place" and the advice that followed: "if I was talking to a class of students right now, I'd tell them to get really good with AI, even better than I am" 31 minutes on what AI does to your job, your work, your next move Demis Hassabis and the CEO of Anthropic in one room probably the best conversation you'll find on this topic the ones who listen won't be the ones replaced, they'll be the ones building and shipping that's exactly why I put together a step-by-step guide on building your own AI agent agents are the part of AI moving fastest right now, the full walkthrough is in the article below
31:25

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind: "some jobs will disappear, but better and more meaningful ones will take their place" and the advice that followed: "if I was talking to a class of students right now, I'd tell them to get really good with AI, even better than I am" 31 minutes on what AI does to your job, your work, your next move Demis Hassabis and the CEO of Anthropic in one room probably the best conversation you'll find on this topic the ones who listen won't be the ones replaced, they'll be the ones building and shipping that's exactly why I put together a step-by-step guide on building your own AI agent agents are the part of AI moving fastest right now, the full walkthrough is in the article below

Anatoli Kopadze

15,625 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”
1:32

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”

Bearly AI

43,816 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Stripe's John Collison thinks people who think AI means the death of software engineering are "all high, honestly." "All these people calling the death of software engineering are smoking something." "You're able to work with AI so much better if you understand the underlying concepts, and you're so much better prepared for that." "To be really effective working with AI, you need to understand what it's doing, and what's going on under the hood. You need to understand the model, and the memory. And then you have your harnesses, and you've got your skills, and how they all interact."
1:39

Stripe's John Collison thinks people who think AI means the death of software engineering are "all high, honestly." "All these people calling the death of software engineering are smoking something." "You're able to work with AI so much better if you understand the underlying concepts, and you're so much better prepared for that." "To be really effective working with AI, you need to understand what it's doing, and what's going on under the hood. You need to understand the model, and the memory. And then you have your harnesses, and you've got your skills, and how they all interact."

TBPN

43,395 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад