Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

First 45 seconds of video "Climate Justice Explained." SIMPLE MESSAGE: It's all whitey's fault. Distributed by MSN (Microsoft). Produced by "Climate Cosmos," affiliated with German company NextVision Media UG. I can't figure out where the money comes from.

Jared Taylor

94,422 subscribers

19,406 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jared Taylor

Jared Taylorvor 1 Jahr

The whole video--boatload of baloney--is here. “Climate Cosmos” website here.

Profilbild von Gaius.XRP

Gaius.XRPvor 1 Jahr

They couldn't have made "Racism" any easier. All we have to do to oppress minorities is drive our car or make a bunch of C02 by having a BBQ. How's your White privilege, I am loving mine!

Profilbild von Uncle Scrooge's Last Sled

Uncle Scrooge's Last Sledvor 1 Jahr

From Jews?

Profilbild von The Real Fred Garvin

The Real Fred Garvinvor 1 Jahr

Don’t homies get any blame? I thought they built America

Profilbild von Haat Praat

Haat Praatvor 1 Jahr

I don't think anyone can blame any single race for climate change. The British started the whole thing in the late 1800s, others later. I think China today is perhaps the worse contributor to climate change.

Profilbild von Andrew J

Andrew Jvor 1 Jahr

Insanity

Profilbild von TrueWhiteEqualitarian

TrueWhiteEqualitarianvor 1 Jahr

Whitey's fault, eh?

Profilbild von Stephen Manning

Stephen Manningvor 1 Jahr

The ONLY thing holding together the whole coalition of spiteful mutants of Progress is Hating Whitey. Without us, they'd turn on each other in a heartbeat.

Profilbild von Algernon Sydney (Snarkpup)

Algernon Sydney (Snarkpup)vor 1 Jahr

There's a whole array of words--justice, diversity, equity, inclusion, democracy, etc.--that have been co-opted by Cultural Marxists as euphemisms for "we win, you lose". Do the mental substitution whenever you hear them. These words have lost their literal meanings.

Profilbild von MarkisBack1234

MarkisBack1234vor 1 Jahr

Most likely USAID

Profilbild von The Daily Muck

The Daily Muckvor 1 Jahr

Read our next article in this ongoing investigation that shows how the government's seizure of this private property and arrest of its owner further exposes the eco-tyranny happening in California...

Ähnliche Videos

Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, debunks the myth pushed by climate grifters that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing catastrophic climate change: "That survey is absolute total codswallop. That survey has got nothing to do with reality, [but] they keep quoting it. Now, this means they're either fellow travellers, or they're fraudulent, or they're terribly lazy. I suspect it's all three." Full video: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #GreatReset

Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, debunks the myth pushed by climate grifters that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing catastrophic climate change: "That survey is absolute total codswallop. That survey has got nothing to do with reality, [but] they keep quoting it. Now, this means they're either fellow travellers, or they're fraudulent, or they're terribly lazy. I suspect it's all three." Full video: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #GreatReset

Wide Awake Media

64,974 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Clavicular was just brutally frame mogged by an ASU frat leader. Jestergooning. UV dodgemaxxing. Cortisol spiking. You can't escape it...what does it all mean? Where did this use of the English language come from? Who the hell is CLAVICULAR? I explained all in my latest YT video:

Clavicular was just brutally frame mogged by an ASU frat leader. Jestergooning. UV dodgemaxxing. Cortisol spiking. You can't escape it...what does it all mean? Where did this use of the English language come from? Who the hell is CLAVICULAR? I explained all in my latest YT video:

Jack Mac

146,997 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, delivers an impassioned speech on his motivations for speaking out against the #ClimateScam, in the face of censorship, cancellation and career suicide: "It's got nothing to do with the environment. It's got nothing to do with climate. It's all about power by unelected people... And they are attacking your freedoms, they are attacking our environment, they are attacking your wallet. They're taking the money from the poor and giving it to the rich." "We have to fight. And you have to fight with facts, and we have to fight much harder than we've ever fought. It's not the climate that's being threatened, it's the future of our children." Full talk: For more content like this, visit:

Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, delivers an impassioned speech on his motivations for speaking out against the #ClimateScam, in the face of censorship, cancellation and career suicide: "It's got nothing to do with the environment. It's got nothing to do with climate. It's all about power by unelected people... And they are attacking your freedoms, they are attacking our environment, they are attacking your wallet. They're taking the money from the poor and giving it to the rich." "We have to fight. And you have to fight with facts, and we have to fight much harder than we've ever fought. It's not the climate that's being threatened, it's the future of our children." Full talk: For more content like this, visit:

Wide Awake Media

288,962 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

Electroverse

35,287 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Grace Blakeley, "People don't leave their homes because they feel like it.. Climate breakdown is going to cause millions of climate refugees by 2050" Grace Blakeley "We've been talking about toxicity and divisiveness in politics.. The response to that from people like Nigel Farage and the Conservative party, is to demonise people crossing the channel saying, the reason you can't get a home, or a job, is because there are people coming into this country that don't deserve to be here, and that is wrong" Jo Coburn, "But you think Labour's approach is wrong too?" Grace Blakeley, "Yes, I don't think they are doing enough.. Where is the plan on climate?" Mike Tapp, "The first responsibility of any government is to secure borders and we make no apologies for that" Mike Tapp MP "We've got really ambitious green plans to go fully renewable by 2030.. We can create a green economy on the back of that by building British.. We can then export that green economy like we did with the first industrial revolution" "We can't fix the world, the global climate problem, but we can do our part, and show others"

Grace Blakeley, "People don't leave their homes because they feel like it.. Climate breakdown is going to cause millions of climate refugees by 2050" Grace Blakeley "We've been talking about toxicity and divisiveness in politics.. The response to that from people like Nigel Farage and the Conservative party, is to demonise people crossing the channel saying, the reason you can't get a home, or a job, is because there are people coming into this country that don't deserve to be here, and that is wrong" Jo Coburn, "But you think Labour's approach is wrong too?" Grace Blakeley, "Yes, I don't think they are doing enough.. Where is the plan on climate?" Mike Tapp, "The first responsibility of any government is to secure borders and we make no apologies for that" Mike Tapp MP "We've got really ambitious green plans to go fully renewable by 2030.. We can create a green economy on the back of that by building British.. We can then export that green economy like we did with the first industrial revolution" "We can't fix the world, the global climate problem, but we can do our part, and show others"

Farrukh

30,176 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

$Since taking office, President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the United Nations Paris agreement on climate change, unleashed fossil fuel production, cut climate subsidies that were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, and chosen as his Secretary of Energy an oilman who helped create the fracking revolution. Given that Democrats have spent the last 20 years describing climate change as an “existential threat” and making climate policy their highest priority under Biden, one would expect there to be significant protests and other actions by progressives. And yet we’ve seen no significant climate change protests since Trump took office two months ago. No Greta Thunberg marches — she’s moved on to Palestine. No drumbeat from the news media. No Extinction Rebellion activists blocking traffic in DC. “Climate emergency” was not among the words chosen by Democrats in Congress to put on the little placards they held up during Trump’s address to Congress earlier this month. In fact, to the extent there have been protests by Democrats, they have been against the world’s most pioneering electric car manufacturer, Tesla, and have nothing to do with climate change. It’s true that many Democrats still care deeply about climate change and the issue may come back in the future. Where just 23% of Republicans view climate change as a serious threat to the country, 78% of Democrats do. “Executive orders are for show,” says political scientist and climate policy expert, The Honest Broker , on a new podcast for Public, “legislation is for real. And there doesn't seem to be any legislative strategy accompanying anything Trump is doing. As far as pulling out of Paris, we've done this dance before. Trump pulled out to Paris, and then Biden went back in.” And the media and Democrats routinely tie every natural disaster, such as the recent fires in LA, to climate change, even though there’s no good science supporting such connections, in most instances. “Every day there's some extreme weather somewhere,” said Pielke, who is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, “and so it is a perfectly made issue for sustaining some degree of attention.” But the partisan polarization over climate change, and the ease with which Trump and Biden can put the US in and out of the Paris agreement, all underscore the overall low level of concern with climate change in comparison to more pressing issues like inflation, migration, and even seemingly fringe issues like transgenderism. “The climate movement is a product of North America and Northern Europe,” said Pielke. “The ‘climate first’ voter is a tiny slice of the political landscape, even though they occupy a lot of attention and time on social media, in universities, and until recently, in the global financial sector. They made a lot of noise, but there weren't a lot of them around to begin with. The climate is just not that important to very many people around the world. People will say it's important. But give them a list of topics and it routinely comes in 17th, 18th, 19th, out of 20.” And now Pielke predicts that climate change could go the way of past environmental scares. “One story for the future of the climate discourse and climate change is that it's not going to go away, but it's going to fade from the center of public view like overpopulation did.” Why did climate change emerge as an issue of concern and then fade? “There's a pretty well-known economist named Anthony Downs who wrote a famous paper called the Issue Attention Cycle,” said Pielke. “It’s like a bell curve. You discover there's a potential problem, there's a lot of excitement, and ‘We’ve got to do something about it!’ Everybody gets on the bandwagon. Then you realize, ‘Oh my gosh, this is difficult! This is challenging!’ And then your attention goes to somewhere else and it's back down. And really climate change is following the Downs’ Issue Attention Cycle perfectly.” Pielke notes that the rate at which economies decarbonize, or reduce the amount of carbon dioxide per unit of GDP, is unchanged. “For the foreseeable future, we will continue to decarbonize the economy no matter what countries say about their climate commitments or whether there's a Viktor Orban or a Donald Trump in office. Decarbonization is much more powerful, it seems, than the politics of the climate. The Paris agreement hasn't really done anything to alter the trajectory of global decarbonization….Climate policy does a lot of things, but reducing carbon dioxide emissions is not one of those things...” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and listen to the full podcast!$

Since taking office, President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the United Nations Paris agreement on climate change, unleashed fossil fuel production, cut climate subsidies that were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, and chosen as his Secretary of Energy an oilman who helped create the fracking revolution. Given that Democrats have spent the last 20 years describing climate change as an “existential threat” and making climate policy their highest priority under Biden, one would expect there to be significant protests and other actions by progressives. And yet we’ve seen no significant climate change protests since Trump took office two months ago. No Greta Thunberg marches — she’s moved on to Palestine. No drumbeat from the news media. No Extinction Rebellion activists blocking traffic in DC. “Climate emergency” was not among the words chosen by Democrats in Congress to put on the little placards they held up during Trump’s address to Congress earlier this month. In fact, to the extent there have been protests by Democrats, they have been against the world’s most pioneering electric car manufacturer, Tesla, and have nothing to do with climate change. It’s true that many Democrats still care deeply about climate change and the issue may come back in the future. Where just 23% of Republicans view climate change as a serious threat to the country, 78% of Democrats do. “Executive orders are for show,” says political scientist and climate policy expert, The Honest Broker , on a new podcast for Public, “legislation is for real. And there doesn't seem to be any legislative strategy accompanying anything Trump is doing. As far as pulling out of Paris, we've done this dance before. Trump pulled out to Paris, and then Biden went back in.” And the media and Democrats routinely tie every natural disaster, such as the recent fires in LA, to climate change, even though there’s no good science supporting such connections, in most instances. “Every day there's some extreme weather somewhere,” said Pielke, who is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, “and so it is a perfectly made issue for sustaining some degree of attention.” But the partisan polarization over climate change, and the ease with which Trump and Biden can put the US in and out of the Paris agreement, all underscore the overall low level of concern with climate change in comparison to more pressing issues like inflation, migration, and even seemingly fringe issues like transgenderism. “The climate movement is a product of North America and Northern Europe,” said Pielke. “The ‘climate first’ voter is a tiny slice of the political landscape, even though they occupy a lot of attention and time on social media, in universities, and until recently, in the global financial sector. They made a lot of noise, but there weren't a lot of them around to begin with. The climate is just not that important to very many people around the world. People will say it's important. But give them a list of topics and it routinely comes in 17th, 18th, 19th, out of 20.” And now Pielke predicts that climate change could go the way of past environmental scares. “One story for the future of the climate discourse and climate change is that it's not going to go away, but it's going to fade from the center of public view like overpopulation did.” Why did climate change emerge as an issue of concern and then fade? “There's a pretty well-known economist named Anthony Downs who wrote a famous paper called the Issue Attention Cycle,” said Pielke. “It’s like a bell curve. You discover there's a potential problem, there's a lot of excitement, and ‘We’ve got to do something about it!’ Everybody gets on the bandwagon. Then you realize, ‘Oh my gosh, this is difficult! This is challenging!’ And then your attention goes to somewhere else and it's back down. And really climate change is following the Downs’ Issue Attention Cycle perfectly.” Pielke notes that the rate at which economies decarbonize, or reduce the amount of carbon dioxide per unit of GDP, is unchanged. “For the foreseeable future, we will continue to decarbonize the economy no matter what countries say about their climate commitments or whether there's a Viktor Orban or a Donald Trump in office. Decarbonization is much more powerful, it seems, than the politics of the climate. The Paris agreement hasn't really done anything to alter the trajectory of global decarbonization….Climate policy does a lot of things, but reducing carbon dioxide emissions is not one of those things...” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and listen to the full podcast!

Michael Shellenberger

51,140 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Deshae Frost might be getting sued by the woman he hit 😳🥀 After Deshae released a video earlier today addressing the clip of him from some years ago where he got physical with her the lady in question comes out with receipts and debunks it saying all what he said on the video was a lie “That’s going to my lawyer I promise you”🥀

Deshae Frost might be getting sued by the woman he hit 😳🥀 After Deshae released a video earlier today addressing the clip of him from some years ago where he got physical with her the lady in question comes out with receipts and debunks it saying all what he said on the video was a lie “That’s going to my lawyer I promise you”🥀

Jaden🎭

79,929 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Here is a summary of what I had to say about finance, decolonization and Climate Justice at COP29 Azerbaijan … It’s hard to take charge of our future even when you don’t see hope. But guess what Adonia Ayebare usually says “We are in the business of optimism.” But at COP29, where finance is supposed to be the headline, I’m wondering—how far can optimism really take us when the numbers, decisions, and justice we desperately need are still missing? This year’s COP was dubbed the “Finance COP,” and rightly so. Climate finance is the engine of climate action. Without it, everything we’ve promised in adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage will simply stall. But optimism is not enough when the urgency is so palpable, and the numbers, frankly, feel insulting. The New Collective Quantified Goal: Where’s the Figure? Let’s get one thing straight. The $100 billion annual pledge—originally promised by developed nations in 2009—was never enough. That figure was meant to be fulfilled by 2020. It wasn’t. And now, as we enter 2025, the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), which should set a fresh target for climate finance, still doesn’t have a number attached. This is not just a technical oversight—it’s a betrayal. A report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warns that we need $340 billion annually by 2030 just for adaptation in developing countries. For mitigation? Trillions. Meanwhile, the total climate finance delivered in 2020 was only $83 billion, and even that includes questionable accounting practices. Some call it “creative reporting,” I call it dishonesty. Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the very system managing climate finance is fundamentally unfair. The World Bank and IMF, the gatekeepers of global finance, were established when African countries were still under colonial rule. Their structures weren’t designed for us; they were designed to serve the interests of the powerful. We need financing mechanisms that put people first—grants, not loans; direct access, not red tape. And we need decision-making structures where the Global South has equal power. After all, how can you fix the climate crisis while sidelining the regions most affected by it? #COP29Azerbaijan

Here is a summary of what I had to say about finance, decolonization and Climate Justice at COP29 Azerbaijan … It’s hard to take charge of our future even when you don’t see hope. But guess what Adonia Ayebare usually says “We are in the business of optimism.” But at COP29, where finance is supposed to be the headline, I’m wondering—how far can optimism really take us when the numbers, decisions, and justice we desperately need are still missing? This year’s COP was dubbed the “Finance COP,” and rightly so. Climate finance is the engine of climate action. Without it, everything we’ve promised in adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage will simply stall. But optimism is not enough when the urgency is so palpable, and the numbers, frankly, feel insulting. The New Collective Quantified Goal: Where’s the Figure? Let’s get one thing straight. The $100 billion annual pledge—originally promised by developed nations in 2009—was never enough. That figure was meant to be fulfilled by 2020. It wasn’t. And now, as we enter 2025, the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), which should set a fresh target for climate finance, still doesn’t have a number attached. This is not just a technical oversight—it’s a betrayal. A report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warns that we need $340 billion annually by 2030 just for adaptation in developing countries. For mitigation? Trillions. Meanwhile, the total climate finance delivered in 2020 was only $83 billion, and even that includes questionable accounting practices. Some call it “creative reporting,” I call it dishonesty. Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the very system managing climate finance is fundamentally unfair. The World Bank and IMF, the gatekeepers of global finance, were established when African countries were still under colonial rule. Their structures weren’t designed for us; they were designed to serve the interests of the powerful. We need financing mechanisms that put people first—grants, not loans; direct access, not red tape. And we need decision-making structures where the Global South has equal power. After all, how can you fix the climate crisis while sidelining the regions most affected by it? #COP29Azerbaijan

Denise Ayebare

18,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Carl Icahn paid a consultant $250,000 to figure out what 173 employees did "we can't figure out what they do either" - he fired all 173 - profit went from $1 million to $96 million this is him breaking down his two biggest trades on camera, why he believes most CEOs in America should be fired, and the pattern that makes every company he touches more profitable "173 people in new york city, five floors. I said what do you guys do? they said you just don't understand, it's a very complex business. I paid a consultant a quarter million dollars. he said we can't figure out what they do either" "I closed the new york office. we kept seven people. today the company makes five times what it made before we bought it" "I knew nothing about the airline business. the company was losing $200 million. my critics said we'd be bankrupt. today we're recording $300 million" "sooner or later all companies end up run by idiots. the number two man by definition has to be a little worse. it's anti-darwinian. I call it survival of the unfittest" bookmark & watch the full conversation ↓

Carl Icahn paid a consultant $250,000 to figure out what 173 employees did "we can't figure out what they do either" - he fired all 173 - profit went from $1 million to $96 million this is him breaking down his two biggest trades on camera, why he believes most CEOs in America should be fired, and the pattern that makes every company he touches more profitable "173 people in new york city, five floors. I said what do you guys do? they said you just don't understand, it's a very complex business. I paid a consultant a quarter million dollars. he said we can't figure out what they do either" "I closed the new york office. we kept seven people. today the company makes five times what it made before we bought it" "I knew nothing about the airline business. the company was losing $200 million. my critics said we'd be bankrupt. today we're recording $300 million" "sooner or later all companies end up run by idiots. the number two man by definition has to be a little worse. it's anti-darwinian. I call it survival of the unfittest" bookmark & watch the full conversation ↓

Сarm1ne

1,832,707 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Yudo Sadewa, son of the Minister of Finance Pak Purbaya, was attacked by a buzzer but his answer left netizen speechless The figure of Yudo Sadewa, son of the Minister of Finance Purbaya, is in the spotlight after his video went viral on social media In his video, Yudo responded to accusations from netizen who accused him of being rich because of "father money" He firmly denied this and explained that his wealth came from crypto investment such as Shiba Inu, Bitcoin at $17,000, and Solana when it was still $8 Yudo also satirized the younger generation who are only busy scrolling TikTok and Facebook without studying economic "Don't just scroll through social media, you also have to learn micro-macro economic so you understand where your money comes from," he said Source : Yudo Sadewa #YudoSadewa #Purbaya #Crypto

Yudo Sadewa, son of the Minister of Finance Pak Purbaya, was attacked by a buzzer but his answer left netizen speechless The figure of Yudo Sadewa, son of the Minister of Finance Purbaya, is in the spotlight after his video went viral on social media In his video, Yudo responded to accusations from netizen who accused him of being rich because of "father money" He firmly denied this and explained that his wealth came from crypto investment such as Shiba Inu, Bitcoin at $17,000, and Solana when it was still $8 Yudo also satirized the younger generation who are only busy scrolling TikTok and Facebook without studying economic "Don't just scroll through social media, you also have to learn micro-macro economic so you understand where your money comes from," he said Source : Yudo Sadewa #YudoSadewa #Purbaya #Crypto

cryptoalpha.id

54,088 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

"Don't be surprised when public trust collapses, right along with your ridiculous climate narrative." German MEP Christine Anderson calls out the EU's climate disinformation. 🔥 "You're pushing this 90% emission cut by 2040... It's a complete overhaul of how we live, how we produce energy, how we heat our homes, and how we farm." "And yet, when the Commission presents it, everything sounds like a win-win situation. More green jobs, cleaner air, innovation, but... the average household will face up to... 400 euros more per year just in energy and transportation costs." "That's before counting the cost of new heating systems, electric cars, higher food prices from farmers pushed out by regulation." "Isn't it a form of disinformation when the Commission sells a radical, costly transformation as painless and then paints anyone who questions it as dishonest and a conspiracy theorist?" "If the Commission keeps doing that, don't be surprised when public trust collapses, right along with your ridiculous climate narrative."

"Don't be surprised when public trust collapses, right along with your ridiculous climate narrative." German MEP Christine Anderson calls out the EU's climate disinformation. 🔥 "You're pushing this 90% emission cut by 2040... It's a complete overhaul of how we live, how we produce energy, how we heat our homes, and how we farm." "And yet, when the Commission presents it, everything sounds like a win-win situation. More green jobs, cleaner air, innovation, but... the average household will face up to... 400 euros more per year just in energy and transportation costs." "That's before counting the cost of new heating systems, electric cars, higher food prices from farmers pushed out by regulation." "Isn't it a form of disinformation when the Commission sells a radical, costly transformation as painless and then paints anyone who questions it as dishonest and a conspiracy theorist?" "If the Commission keeps doing that, don't be surprised when public trust collapses, right along with your ridiculous climate narrative."

Wide Awake Media

50,819 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk: To do something truly new, you can't reason by analogy. You have to reason from first principles. “I'm a big believer in the science or physics framework of trying to analyze a problem, particularly if it's new. If something's new, then analogies don't work very well, because it's new. The way we get through daily life is mostly by analogy, by copying things with minor variations, because it's a computational shortcut. But if you want to do something that's fundamentally new, or particularly if it's counterintuitive, then you have to do a first principles analysis. You take things from what appear to be the fundamental, simple truths, and then reason up from there. And that requires a lot more thinking, and you can't do that for everything. But if you're trying to figure out something new, I think it's really the only way to go.” Source: American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting, San Francisco, December 16, 2015.

Elon Musk: To do something truly new, you can't reason by analogy. You have to reason from first principles. “I'm a big believer in the science or physics framework of trying to analyze a problem, particularly if it's new. If something's new, then analogies don't work very well, because it's new. The way we get through daily life is mostly by analogy, by copying things with minor variations, because it's a computational shortcut. But if you want to do something that's fundamentally new, or particularly if it's counterintuitive, then you have to do a first principles analysis. You take things from what appear to be the fundamental, simple truths, and then reason up from there. And that requires a lot more thinking, and you can't do that for everything. But if you're trying to figure out something new, I think it's really the only way to go.” Source: American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting, San Francisco, December 16, 2015.

ELON CLIPS

34,638 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The devastation caused by mass migration across the West is no ‘coincidence’ with all the other encroachments we now see upon our freedoms. As I say in my video this has all been done by design, the collapsing of our borders is an engineered plan… one that I believe will lead to our replacement if we do not act. Please check out the document I am referring to ‘It is possible to link migration to every goal in the 2030 agenda’ - this should scare you. It’s also estimated by the UN that by 2030 there will be over 1 billion ‘climate refugees’ 🙄… this is where the role of digital ID’s come in as the ‘solution’. We must say No!

The devastation caused by mass migration across the West is no ‘coincidence’ with all the other encroachments we now see upon our freedoms. As I say in my video this has all been done by design, the collapsing of our borders is an engineered plan… one that I believe will lead to our replacement if we do not act. Please check out the document I am referring to ‘It is possible to link migration to every goal in the 2030 agenda’ - this should scare you. It’s also estimated by the UN that by 2030 there will be over 1 billion ‘climate refugees’ 🙄… this is where the role of digital ID’s come in as the ‘solution’. We must say No!

Sas

23,955 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kremlin propagandists are using fake videos to scare Germans about war with Russia, falling birth rates, and mental health issues among children. According to Russian OSINT media, they are produced by "Matryoshka," a large Russian disinformation network targeting foreign audiences. The videos mimic major Western outlets, are AI-voiced in English, and run 20-40 seconds, emphasizing that German authorities are allegedly preparing citizens for war. One fake video styled as DW claims war with Russia is the top fear among German children, supposedly fueled by local media propaganda, and that authorities are "militarizing society" by increasing children's stress and mental health risks. Another, imitating Die Zeit, asserts Germans are avoiding having children out of war fears. A third, mimicking Politico, fabricates a German psychologist's quote saying Russia would "wipe Germany off the map."

Kremlin propagandists are using fake videos to scare Germans about war with Russia, falling birth rates, and mental health issues among children. According to Russian OSINT media, they are produced by "Matryoshka," a large Russian disinformation network targeting foreign audiences. The videos mimic major Western outlets, are AI-voiced in English, and run 20-40 seconds, emphasizing that German authorities are allegedly preparing citizens for war. One fake video styled as DW claims war with Russia is the top fear among German children, supposedly fueled by local media propaganda, and that authorities are "militarizing society" by increasing children's stress and mental health risks. Another, imitating Die Zeit, asserts Germans are avoiding having children out of war fears. A third, mimicking Politico, fabricates a German psychologist's quote saying Russia would "wipe Germany off the map."

Visegrád 24

30,192 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

BREAKING: James O'Keefe Reveals The Federal Government Is Funding Left-Wing Terrorism Across The Country, Announces Full Report Dropping TODAY: "I have a video out in two hours of them admitting where they're getting the money. Some of the money comes from the government. The government is funding it. They admit what organizations they are with. These people are willing to die for their cause." Expose it all James O'Keefe

BREAKING: James O'Keefe Reveals The Federal Government Is Funding Left-Wing Terrorism Across The Country, Announces Full Report Dropping TODAY: "I have a video out in two hours of them admitting where they're getting the money. Some of the money comes from the government. The government is funding it. They admit what organizations they are with. These people are willing to die for their cause." Expose it all James O'Keefe

Benny Johnson

307,313 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

So Mark Carney is in Canada, prepping the ground for the WEF's "climate competitiveness" agenda. Listen past the buzzwords. Here’s what he’s really saying: He says: "Our focus is on climate competitiveness." He means: We will fuse climate policy with corporate profit. Your national economy will be retooled to serve a global ESG framework dictated by Davos. He says: Look at "low carbon" offshore oil & gas as a "key driver of competitiveness." He means: The goal isn't to phase out fossil fuels; it's to let massive, connected corporations (who can afford the compliance costs) dominate under the guise of being "green." Smaller players get crushed. He says: Massive hydro projects will power AI data centers and create "new economic opportunities." He means: Your natural resources will be leveraged to power the next energy-hungry frontier for Big Tech, all while being rebranded as a climate solution. It's not about your local community; it's about feeding globalist tech ambitions. He says: Our home-building strategy is about "lower carbon, more efficient" homes. He means: We will create a new regulated industry where your ability to build or buy a home is tied to your adherence to our climate dictates. It's a top-down control mechanism over another fundamental aspect of life. The core message? The climate crisis is no longer about saving the planet; it's the perfect, unquestionable narrative to justify a fundamental economic restructuring. Competitiveness is redefined as compliance with a centralized, unaccountable vision. This isn't environmentalism. It's corporatism wrapped in a green flag.

So Mark Carney is in Canada, prepping the ground for the WEF's "climate competitiveness" agenda. Listen past the buzzwords. Here’s what he’s really saying: He says: "Our focus is on climate competitiveness." He means: We will fuse climate policy with corporate profit. Your national economy will be retooled to serve a global ESG framework dictated by Davos. He says: Look at "low carbon" offshore oil & gas as a "key driver of competitiveness." He means: The goal isn't to phase out fossil fuels; it's to let massive, connected corporations (who can afford the compliance costs) dominate under the guise of being "green." Smaller players get crushed. He says: Massive hydro projects will power AI data centers and create "new economic opportunities." He means: Your natural resources will be leveraged to power the next energy-hungry frontier for Big Tech, all while being rebranded as a climate solution. It's not about your local community; it's about feeding globalist tech ambitions. He says: Our home-building strategy is about "lower carbon, more efficient" homes. He means: We will create a new regulated industry where your ability to build or buy a home is tied to your adherence to our climate dictates. It's a top-down control mechanism over another fundamental aspect of life. The core message? The climate crisis is no longer about saving the planet; it's the perfect, unquestionable narrative to justify a fundamental economic restructuring. Competitiveness is redefined as compliance with a centralized, unaccountable vision. This isn't environmentalism. It's corporatism wrapped in a green flag.

Camus

22,137 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Surveys consistently rank Patagonia as one of the most reputable brands in America, not just for its outdoor clothing and gear but also for being good environmental stewards. That comes from its founder, Yvon Chouinard. When he retired, he didn't cash out by selling the billion-dollar company but instead transferred it to a trust that uses Patagonia's profits to combat climate change and protect undeveloped land. The story of both the company and its iconoclastic founder is told in a new book, “Dirtbag Billionaire: How Yvon Chouinard Built Patagonia, Made a Fortune, and Gave It All Away.” John Yang spoke with author David Gelles for more.

Surveys consistently rank Patagonia as one of the most reputable brands in America, not just for its outdoor clothing and gear but also for being good environmental stewards. That comes from its founder, Yvon Chouinard. When he retired, he didn't cash out by selling the billion-dollar company but instead transferred it to a trust that uses Patagonia's profits to combat climate change and protect undeveloped land. The story of both the company and its iconoclastic founder is told in a new book, “Dirtbag Billionaire: How Yvon Chouinard Built Patagonia, Made a Fortune, and Gave It All Away.” John Yang spoke with author David Gelles for more.

PBS News

65,714 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Joe Borelli: “University of California, Berkeley, not exactly known for its conservative-leaning professors, they had a study out this year that talked about affordability in red states versus blue states. The first thing Americans should actually ask themselves when they're struggling with affordability is, who is in charge of my state? Is it Democrats or Republicans? On housing and utilities, the two biggest drivers of affordabilities, University of California, Berkeley says red states are 50 % less high cost of living—” Abby Phillip: “Why would that be, Joe?” Joe Borelli: “I'm glad you asked. It's driven by nonsensical climate policies. It's driven by the inability of free market to build housing, the inability of free market to develop housing in areas where they can't.” “It's property taxes, which are about a third of housing costs. It's the largest contributor to cost.”

Joe Borelli: “University of California, Berkeley, not exactly known for its conservative-leaning professors, they had a study out this year that talked about affordability in red states versus blue states. The first thing Americans should actually ask themselves when they're struggling with affordability is, who is in charge of my state? Is it Democrats or Republicans? On housing and utilities, the two biggest drivers of affordabilities, University of California, Berkeley says red states are 50 % less high cost of living—” Abby Phillip: “Why would that be, Joe?” Joe Borelli: “I'm glad you asked. It's driven by nonsensical climate policies. It's driven by the inability of free market to build housing, the inability of free market to develop housing in areas where they can't.” “It's property taxes, which are about a third of housing costs. It's the largest contributor to cost.”

RedWave Press

234,303 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten