Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

💥Flashback to when Dr Laposata testified that John O’Keefe didn’t have so much as a hairline fracture on the arm that was supposedly struck by a huge suv at 24 mph!

DonutsBaga's profile picture

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

10,272 subscribers

12,599 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Dr. Laposata just testified that John O’Keefe did not experience hypothermia nor did he have any observable signs of frost bite. She also testified that in her expert opinion, John O’Keefe’s cause of death was brain injuries and skull fractures due to blunt force trauma of the head. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial
1:12

Dr. Laposata just testified that John O’Keefe did not experience hypothermia nor did he have any observable signs of frost bite. She also testified that in her expert opinion, John O’Keefe’s cause of death was brain injuries and skull fractures due to blunt force trauma of the head. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

41,828 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a forensic pathologist & former chief medical examiner for Rhode Island served as a key expert witness for the defense during Karen Read's 2025 retrial She testified that O'Keefe died from a blunt force head injury and skull fracture, explicitly stating there was no medical evidence that he was struck by a vehicle. NO EVIDENCE of impact with a vehicle. NONE. ZERO. NADA John's BODY told the truth.
0:22

Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a forensic pathologist & former chief medical examiner for Rhode Island served as a key expert witness for the defense during Karen Read's 2025 retrial She testified that O'Keefe died from a blunt force head injury and skull fracture, explicitly stating there was no medical evidence that he was struck by a vehicle. NO EVIDENCE of impact with a vehicle. NONE. ZERO. NADA John's BODY told the truth.

Boston Brandi

14,536 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

A classic that never gets old. “The claim that the abrasions on his [John O’Keefe] arm were caused by a car hitting it are insulting to a jury” - Solomon Radner Karen Read was framed. Turtleboy was right.
1:24

A classic that never gets old. “The claim that the abrasions on his [John O’Keefe] arm were caused by a car hitting it are insulting to a jury” - Solomon Radner Karen Read was framed. Turtleboy was right.

Lara

24,400 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

💥Retired Canton Police Sergeant Peter Murphy says a Canton plow contractor, told him he heard a radio transmission, reporting a pedestrian struck by a plow on Fairview Road at 4am. This was hours before John O’Keefe was found dead! 💥Justice For John O’keefe!
0:59

Sensitive content

💥Retired Canton Police Sergeant Peter Murphy says a Canton plow contractor, told him he heard a radio transmission, reporting a pedestrian struck by a plow on Fairview Road at 4am. This was hours before John O’Keefe was found dead! 💥Justice For John O’keefe!

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

71,868 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

For months, the prosecution has floated theories that John O’Keefe may have been struck by a vehicle, specifically Karen Read’s Lexus causing injuries as he allegedly stumbled and fell. But today, thanks to the defense entering X-rays into evidence, we now have hard proof that John O’Keefe had no fractures in his arm or hand. The X-rays do exist despite prosecution expert Dr. Welcher suggesting they didn’t. That means no defensive wounds, no impact trauma to the limbs and no car hit his arm. If Karen’s SUV struck O’Keefe as the Commonwealth claims with such force that it broke his skull and threw him then ask yourself this, Wouldn’t there be trauma to the arms or hands? Wouldn’t he try to break his fall? Brace? Shield himself? But nothing. No breaks. No fractures. Clean. Which leads to a simple, devastating possibility, If the car didn’t hit his arm… maybe the car didn’t hit him at all. And that’s exactly the doubt the defense is sowing not with theories, but with medical proof. The kind that doesn’t scream, shout, or lie it just sits there quietly... being true. Dr welcher replied WITH CAREFULLY HEDGED LANGUAGE HE DID NOT LIE. HE NEVER LOOKED!
1:54

For months, the prosecution has floated theories that John O’Keefe may have been struck by a vehicle, specifically Karen Read’s Lexus causing injuries as he allegedly stumbled and fell. But today, thanks to the defense entering X-rays into evidence, we now have hard proof that John O’Keefe had no fractures in his arm or hand. The X-rays do exist despite prosecution expert Dr. Welcher suggesting they didn’t. That means no defensive wounds, no impact trauma to the limbs and no car hit his arm. If Karen’s SUV struck O’Keefe as the Commonwealth claims with such force that it broke his skull and threw him then ask yourself this, Wouldn’t there be trauma to the arms or hands? Wouldn’t he try to break his fall? Brace? Shield himself? But nothing. No breaks. No fractures. Clean. Which leads to a simple, devastating possibility, If the car didn’t hit his arm… maybe the car didn’t hit him at all. And that’s exactly the doubt the defense is sowing not with theories, but with medical proof. The kind that doesn’t scream, shout, or lie it just sits there quietly... being true. Dr welcher replied WITH CAREFULLY HEDGED LANGUAGE HE DID NOT LIE. HE NEVER LOOKED!

Dixie Normus

45,002 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

John O’Keefe’s brother testified Monday morning in the #KarenRead trial. Paul O’Keefe testified that when he said goodbye to the Boston police officer in the hospital, John was “pretty banged up” and had swollen eyes that looked like “ping-pong balls."
1:37

John O’Keefe’s brother testified Monday morning in the #KarenRead trial. Paul O’Keefe testified that when he said goodbye to the Boston police officer in the hospital, John was “pretty banged up” and had swollen eyes that looked like “ping-pong balls."

Law&Crime Network

11,713 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A woman claiming to support John O’Keefe, while sitting next to his murderers, called me an asshole on the way out of the courtroom room today. She didn’t have as much to say when she left the courthouse
1:59

A woman claiming to support John O’Keefe, while sitting next to his murderers, called me an asshole on the way out of the courtroom room today. She didn’t have as much to say when she left the courthouse

Aidan Kearney

134,723 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Just a reminder: The FBI that FKR is so enamored with— the same agency that found NO evidence of conspiracy or corruption in the John O’Keefe case — also determined that John O’Keefe’s arm wounds were NOT caused by a dog bite.
0:44

Just a reminder: The FBI that FKR is so enamored with— the same agency that found NO evidence of conspiracy or corruption in the John O’Keefe case — also determined that John O’Keefe’s arm wounds were NOT caused by a dog bite.

Mama Llama

12,039 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.
0:20

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.

TinyElvis

121,320 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Higgins testified he saw John O’Keefe come into the house. By process of elimination that is the only person it could have been. Why did no one else testify that they saw this person too? Where was Higgins when this person he saw enter the house, what entrance? David Yannetti
1:17

Higgins testified he saw John O’Keefe come into the house. By process of elimination that is the only person it could have been. Why did no one else testify that they saw this person too? Where was Higgins when this person he saw enter the house, what entrance? David Yannetti

Nosey Ren

35,174 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

As promised during our live earlier today, here is the full video of Mr. O’Keefe cleaning off John’s Traverse. Karen Read provided Sean McDonough with a single snapshot from this longer video and tried to use it as “proof” that Mr. O’Keefe knew about, and was involved in, covering up damage to John’s vehicle allegedly caused by her 0.5 mph tap. But even the defense’s own expert testified during the first trial that a tap at that speed would not have caused the taillight damage we all saw - damage Karen herself admitted was there. Of course, that didn’t stop her. Instead, she pulled one brief moment from the video, stripped it of all context, and pushed it publicly to fit her narrative.
6:46

As promised during our live earlier today, here is the full video of Mr. O’Keefe cleaning off John’s Traverse. Karen Read provided Sean McDonough with a single snapshot from this longer video and tried to use it as “proof” that Mr. O’Keefe knew about, and was involved in, covering up damage to John’s vehicle allegedly caused by her 0.5 mph tap. But even the defense’s own expert testified during the first trial that a tap at that speed would not have caused the taillight damage we all saw - damage Karen herself admitted was there. Of course, that didn’t stop her. Instead, she pulled one brief moment from the video, stripped it of all context, and pushed it publicly to fit her narrative.

The FOURensic Room

48,599 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Not a single medical expert called by the defense, or called by the Commonwealth, has testified that John O’Keefe was hit by a car. Not one. Think about the irony. Not one. That’s not just significant. It’s literally the most important point in the entire trial. #KarenRead
0:23

Not a single medical expert called by the defense, or called by the Commonwealth, has testified that John O’Keefe was hit by a car. Not one. Think about the irony. Not one. That’s not just significant. It’s literally the most important point in the entire trial. #KarenRead

Olivia

157,100 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce