Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but...

19,121 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

NEW🚨 Joe Lonsdale on Flock cameras: "The core of our Constitution is that we have to check our government; we have to watch it. [But] turning Flock off is just anti-civilization. It's going to help the criminals, which is what the far left wants here. There are ways we can use technology competently to both watch the watchers... and catch the bad guys." Will Cain: I just had the Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton, in here in my studio. And as he was walking out, I said: Hey, what do you think of Flock? And he said to me: You know what? I'm really concerned because I don't like that kind of power in the hands of the government. Of course, I want to enforce the law, but I don't like the idea of the government having that kind of surveillance over average Americans. We know what they've done with that information in the past. Joe Lonsdale: I'm a supporter of the American Founders as well, and our whole Constitution was about checking the power of the government. So I think it's a healthy instinct for people on both sides to want to be suspicious, to want to watch the watchers. And we have to do that. But I'm also on the side of civilization. I have six young children, and this technology has caught hundreds of thousands of criminals. It's exonerated huge numbers of innocent people. And there are ways we can use technology competently to both watch the watchers to delete data you're not allowed to see and catch the bad guys... Will: All right, then last to you, Joe. The problem is, if you and I could agree and we probably can, this has some really valuable applications. We're catching kidnappers... They caught the Brown shooter... When is the government ever stopped at a narrow, good application? It grows and it always gets malignant. Joe: I one hundred percent agree that the core of our Constitution and our society is that we have to check our government, we have to watch it. We have to have rules to limit how they use these things. And it turns out the technology, if you're competent, if you have common sense, you could put those restrictions and everyone in the public should have a right to see how it was used. I'm totally fine with that, by the way. I'm not okay with the Flock camera getting me in trouble for jaywalking because that's B.S.. I think it should only be crimes with serious victims. I don't want to be watched either. None of us do. But if this is going to be able to save hundreds of thousands of people, and it's going to be able to protect innocent, exonerate people, obviously you want to be able to catch the bad guys. We had a case in Austin recently where I live where someone was not caught because they turned off all the cameras until they drove into a town nearby after a horrible crime that happened to have Flock. I think we can have a compromise where we watch the watchers... But I think turning it off is just anti-civilization. And it's going to help the criminals, which is what the far left wants here. Will Cain The Will Cain Show

American Optimist

61,396 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen