Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Gov. Ron DeSantis is TAKING DOWN Flock cameras, and AG James Uthmeier just said we need to protect constitutional rights and not allow Florida to become a surveillance state Major legislation is expected to REIN IN Flock across Florida "We need to restrict private companies from...

EricLDaugh's profile picture

Eric Daugherty

1,179,297 subscribers

30,116 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”
1:08

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

The DeVory Darkins Show

20,786 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

James Freeman is a legend in Constitutional Activism He attends a public town meeting and is told they need to take his information to be apart of a PUBLIC meeting. They tell him “It’s the law” This is why we all need to know our rights and stand up to these tyrants:
3:08

James Freeman is a legend in Constitutional Activism He attends a public town meeting and is told they need to take his information to be apart of a PUBLIC meeting. They tell him “It’s the law” This is why we all need to know our rights and stand up to these tyrants:

Wall Street Apes

260,547 просмотров • 1 год назад

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on the message around the training ground after becoming champions: “They don’t need any kicks. If they need a kick, believe me, they will get a kick! But they don’t need a kick. “What they need is a realisation that the energy, the desire and the passion that they have to go again this season is there. Certainly there. And [they need to] look after each other every day because we have built something that is special. “It takes a long time to build it, and we need to make sure that we look after it daily. “That’s the most important thing.”
1:01

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on the message around the training ground after becoming champions: “They don’t need any kicks. If they need a kick, believe me, they will get a kick! But they don’t need a kick. “What they need is a realisation that the energy, the desire and the passion that they have to go again this season is there. Certainly there. And [they need to] look after each other every day because we have built something that is special. “It takes a long time to build it, and we need to make sure that we look after it daily. “That’s the most important thing.”

Connor Humm

38,634 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A Constitutional Attorney SPEAKS OUT Against What The United States Government Has Become, TYRANNICAL. Calls Out Big Pharma MUST LISTEN: “We Have The Right To Resist — When in the world do we start testing things on children?” “We The People is how the Constitution starts. A magistrate is a person that operates under authority and they are lesser magistrates. The founding fathers of this country understood that there is going to come a point in time where the federal government will need to be checked. If not, they will become tyrants. ‌ And that is what's happening now. So, the Declaration of Independence says that everyone, by virtue of being a human being, has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The federal government too, the federal government purpose is to protect the rights of those citizens, the rights of us to our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The third point of that document is if they fail to protect its citizens and enforce those rights, the citizens have a right to revolt. Do you understand? We have a right to resist and we have an obligation and a duty to do so. ‌ Do you understand? ‌ Yeah! ‌ THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR CHILDREN, We cannot sit down! Nope. ‌ Everybody knows even the bad ones know that if you want to affect a country, you go for its children. ‌ When in the world do we start using children as bulletproof vests for us? ‌ When in the world do we start testing things on children? Legal shield. ‌ You have started a war! ‌ Each one reach one and teach one. Do you understand? As a magistrate in this country, the United States government, our government, our local leaders have to answer to us. The ninth amendment says that any rights that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the people. I don't want to hear that mandates are not enumerated in the Constitution because for the stuff that is not enumerated means to equal protection is the right to protect my body. When you want to, when you want to push something into my body against my consent, without my consent, it is rape. And this is medical rape. No!”
2:59

A Constitutional Attorney SPEAKS OUT Against What The United States Government Has Become, TYRANNICAL. Calls Out Big Pharma MUST LISTEN: “We Have The Right To Resist — When in the world do we start testing things on children?” “We The People is how the Constitution starts. A magistrate is a person that operates under authority and they are lesser magistrates. The founding fathers of this country understood that there is going to come a point in time where the federal government will need to be checked. If not, they will become tyrants. ‌ And that is what's happening now. So, the Declaration of Independence says that everyone, by virtue of being a human being, has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The federal government too, the federal government purpose is to protect the rights of those citizens, the rights of us to our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The third point of that document is if they fail to protect its citizens and enforce those rights, the citizens have a right to revolt. Do you understand? We have a right to resist and we have an obligation and a duty to do so. ‌ Do you understand? ‌ Yeah! ‌ THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR CHILDREN, We cannot sit down! Nope. ‌ Everybody knows even the bad ones know that if you want to affect a country, you go for its children. ‌ When in the world do we start using children as bulletproof vests for us? ‌ When in the world do we start testing things on children? Legal shield. ‌ You have started a war! ‌ Each one reach one and teach one. Do you understand? As a magistrate in this country, the United States government, our government, our local leaders have to answer to us. The ninth amendment says that any rights that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the people. I don't want to hear that mandates are not enumerated in the Constitution because for the stuff that is not enumerated means to equal protection is the right to protect my body. When you want to, when you want to push something into my body against my consent, without my consent, it is rape. And this is medical rape. No!”

Wall Street Apes

228,883 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Arteta: “We need everything. We need the first of all, we need everybody fit and available. So the ones that are not involved, the ones that are not with us, that are really big, important players, we need them immediately with us because then we're going to be much stronger. “And then, the other ones, they need to stand up me, the first one and embrace this challenge and go for it. So today we have to suffer. It's painful. It's a terrible feeling. But tomorrow is a different day and if somebody would have said to me in August, 'You are in this position right now in April,' I'm sure we would all take it.”
0:48

Arteta: “We need everything. We need the first of all, we need everybody fit and available. So the ones that are not involved, the ones that are not with us, that are really big, important players, we need them immediately with us because then we're going to be much stronger. “And then, the other ones, they need to stand up me, the first one and embrace this challenge and go for it. So today we have to suffer. It's painful. It's a terrible feeling. But tomorrow is a different day and if somebody would have said to me in August, 'You are in this position right now in April,' I'm sure we would all take it.”

Connor Humm

59,755 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨ELON MUSK ON RIDICULOUS REGULATIONS 😂😂 "SpaceX had to do a study to see if Starship would hit a shark. I'm like "It's a big ocean, there's a lot of sharks. It's not impossible, but it's very unlikely." OK fine, we'll do it, but we need the data, can you give us the Shark data? They said no. They said they could give the data to their Western division but they don't trust them. We're like, 'Is this a comedy?' Eventually we got the data, and the sharks were going to be fine. We thought we were done. But then they hit us with: 'Well, what about whales?" When you look at the Pacific, how many whales do you see? Honestly, if we did hit a whale, the whale had it coming, because the odds are so low. It's like Final Destination: whale edition. So then we had to do the WHALE analysis. It goes on and on. They said, what if the rocket goes underwater and explodes and the whales get hearing damage? Umm, If we could make a rocket go underwater and become a submarine, that would be a feat of physics that we could not accomplish. It's just one crazy thing after another. So yes, I really feel the pain of Government overregulation."
3:12

🚨ELON MUSK ON RIDICULOUS REGULATIONS 😂😂 "SpaceX had to do a study to see if Starship would hit a shark. I'm like "It's a big ocean, there's a lot of sharks. It's not impossible, but it's very unlikely." OK fine, we'll do it, but we need the data, can you give us the Shark data? They said no. They said they could give the data to their Western division but they don't trust them. We're like, 'Is this a comedy?' Eventually we got the data, and the sharks were going to be fine. We thought we were done. But then they hit us with: 'Well, what about whales?" When you look at the Pacific, how many whales do you see? Honestly, if we did hit a whale, the whale had it coming, because the odds are so low. It's like Final Destination: whale edition. So then we had to do the WHALE analysis. It goes on and on. They said, what if the rocket goes underwater and explodes and the whales get hearing damage? Umm, If we could make a rocket go underwater and become a submarine, that would be a feat of physics that we could not accomplish. It's just one crazy thing after another. So yes, I really feel the pain of Government overregulation."

Autism Capital 🧩

18,322,818 просмотров • 1 год назад

PM Frederiksen: we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately. Can you imagine? I mean, it's like minus 25 degrees and then you attack the energy system. I mean, it's so crazy that only Russians would do such a thing. But this is how Russia is and it will not change. And I think our problem in Ukraine is still that there are still red lines when it comes to the weapons they can use to win this war. And you cannot win a war with the one hand tied on your back. We need to give them weapons so they can strike into Russia. We have had this discussion for several years. We are still discussing it. I mean, for the last three years on this conference, I have said, why are we not providing them the air defense that they need? And everybody is doing like this. They still lack air defense. You cannot protect a country without air defense. We know exactly what we need to deliver, including, of course, membership of NATO, because if they were a NATO member now, we would be in a completely different situation now. So, we know what to do. But first of all, we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately.
1:36

PM Frederiksen: we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately. Can you imagine? I mean, it's like minus 25 degrees and then you attack the energy system. I mean, it's so crazy that only Russians would do such a thing. But this is how Russia is and it will not change. And I think our problem in Ukraine is still that there are still red lines when it comes to the weapons they can use to win this war. And you cannot win a war with the one hand tied on your back. We need to give them weapons so they can strike into Russia. We have had this discussion for several years. We are still discussing it. I mean, for the last three years on this conference, I have said, why are we not providing them the air defense that they need? And everybody is doing like this. They still lack air defense. You cannot protect a country without air defense. We know exactly what we need to deliver, including, of course, membership of NATO, because if they were a NATO member now, we would be in a completely different situation now. So, we know what to do. But first of all, we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately.

Anton Gerashchenko

105,935 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Billionaire Shlomo Kramer calls for the First Amendment to be eliminated in the United States. Why is this person being given a voice on our mainstream media platforms? "It's time to limit the first amendment in order to protect it, and quickly before it's too late." "We need to control all the social media platforms. We need [the government to] stack rank the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control over what they are saying based on that ranking. And we need to educate people against lies.."
2:41

Billionaire Shlomo Kramer calls for the First Amendment to be eliminated in the United States. Why is this person being given a voice on our mainstream media platforms? "It's time to limit the first amendment in order to protect it, and quickly before it's too late." "We need to control all the social media platforms. We need [the government to] stack rank the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control over what they are saying based on that ranking. And we need to educate people against lies.."

Orwell Day

16,625 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SECRETARY RUBIO: We’ll have to reexamine whether NATO is serving its purpose or has now become a one-way street where America is simply in a position to help Europe but when we need the help of our allies, they deny us basing rights and overflight.
0:38

SECRETARY RUBIO: We’ll have to reexamine whether NATO is serving its purpose or has now become a one-way street where America is simply in a position to help Europe but when we need the help of our allies, they deny us basing rights and overflight.

Department of State

70,838 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 “Utah is planning on taking water away from farmers and ranchers right now” “They are currently writing new legislation that is going to put new regulations on farmers and ranchers water use — We need your help. We need to save the farmers and ranchers” “The verbiage in the bill is that they are going to require them to use less water, water that has been already granted to them from generations past, or they're going to require them to use more water saving technologies. But who is going to pay for that? It sure as hell isn't going to be the legislators, it's not going to be the senators, it's not going to be the governor. It's going to be the taxpayers and the farmers and ranchers who are going to have to equip for this. So right now we need your help. We need you to call all of the state senators, we need to call all the city offices, we need to send as many emails as we possibly can. Leave the farmers out of this bill. There should be no reason that they're included in this whatsoever —- So if you guys can please make the calls, please send the emails. We need your help.” ‘The Utah farmers and ranchers truly need your help. We barely have enough water as it is to raise our crops to feed and grow our animals. If there is any more regulation, we will lose more and more and more of our family farms and ranches. They will not be able to survive this. This is just a stepping stone and if it happens in one place, it will continue to happen all across the nation please if you can share with your family and friends please leave your comments below. We need your help.”
1:15

🚨 “Utah is planning on taking water away from farmers and ranchers right now” “They are currently writing new legislation that is going to put new regulations on farmers and ranchers water use — We need your help. We need to save the farmers and ranchers” “The verbiage in the bill is that they are going to require them to use less water, water that has been already granted to them from generations past, or they're going to require them to use more water saving technologies. But who is going to pay for that? It sure as hell isn't going to be the legislators, it's not going to be the senators, it's not going to be the governor. It's going to be the taxpayers and the farmers and ranchers who are going to have to equip for this. So right now we need your help. We need you to call all of the state senators, we need to call all the city offices, we need to send as many emails as we possibly can. Leave the farmers out of this bill. There should be no reason that they're included in this whatsoever —- So if you guys can please make the calls, please send the emails. We need your help.” ‘The Utah farmers and ranchers truly need your help. We barely have enough water as it is to raise our crops to feed and grow our animals. If there is any more regulation, we will lose more and more and more of our family farms and ranches. They will not be able to survive this. This is just a stepping stone and if it happens in one place, it will continue to happen all across the nation please if you can share with your family and friends please leave your comments below. We need your help.”

Wall Street Apes

107,117 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Democracy is a nuisance and they need to get rid of it." According to German MEP Christine Anderson, globalist elites deployed totalitarian Covid restrictions as part of a deliberate effort to erode freedom and democracy in the West—transforming constitutional rights into privileges that governments can grant or revoke depending on obedience. "They didn't need to do that in China because China already is a totalitarian regime." "They didn't need to do that in North Korea—it already is a totalitarian regime." "But they needed to do it in the Western democracies because... from their perspective, democracy is a nuisance and they need to get rid of it."
2:26

"Democracy is a nuisance and they need to get rid of it." According to German MEP Christine Anderson, globalist elites deployed totalitarian Covid restrictions as part of a deliberate effort to erode freedom and democracy in the West—transforming constitutional rights into privileges that governments can grant or revoke depending on obedience. "They didn't need to do that in China because China already is a totalitarian regime." "They didn't need to do that in North Korea—it already is a totalitarian regime." "But they needed to do it in the Western democracies because... from their perspective, democracy is a nuisance and they need to get rid of it."

Wide Awake Media

44,247 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."
1:15

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

Red Pill USA

760,219 просмотров • 2 лет назад

He makes an interesting argument that Flock cameras violate the 2nd Amendment because they track people going to gun stores, gun ranges, and so they enable the Federal government (we know they have access to Flock data) to make a database of gun owners. As we know, if the government is ever going to attempt a gun grab, they are going to need a gun owners database. So, does the 2nd Amendment prohibit the government from making a database of gun owners? I am not a Constitutional scholar, but I found there are laws that restrict building such a database, and that the Supreme Court has never reviewed whether such a database violates the Constitution. On whether it is constitutional, some argue that even the Supreme Court is not the final decider of what is or is not Constitutional, since the government's power comes from the people. Popular constitutionalism holds that the people, through elections, juries, protest, and ordinary politics, also interpret the Constitution, and that political means can contest and eventually overturn Court decisions. So keep that in mind, too.
1:28

He makes an interesting argument that Flock cameras violate the 2nd Amendment because they track people going to gun stores, gun ranges, and so they enable the Federal government (we know they have access to Flock data) to make a database of gun owners. As we know, if the government is ever going to attempt a gun grab, they are going to need a gun owners database. So, does the 2nd Amendment prohibit the government from making a database of gun owners? I am not a Constitutional scholar, but I found there are laws that restrict building such a database, and that the Supreme Court has never reviewed whether such a database violates the Constitution. On whether it is constitutional, some argue that even the Supreme Court is not the final decider of what is or is not Constitutional, since the government's power comes from the people. Popular constitutionalism holds that the people, through elections, juries, protest, and ordinary politics, also interpret the Constitution, and that political means can contest and eventually overturn Court decisions. So keep that in mind, too.

Orwell Day

19,844 просмотров • 1 день назад

Yesterday we announced our Grow Ontario Plan. Our food and farming sector is one of Ontario's greatest assets, and it's important that we protect it from Doug Ford. Ontario cannot continue to lose over 300 acres of farmland everyday, and we need to make sure our local farmers have the support they need to make a living.
3:11

Yesterday we announced our Grow Ontario Plan. Our food and farming sector is one of Ontario's greatest assets, and it's important that we protect it from Doug Ford. Ontario cannot continue to lose over 300 acres of farmland everyday, and we need to make sure our local farmers have the support they need to make a living.

Mike Schreiner

12,682 просмотров • 1 год назад

AOC: FISA has been a constitutional civil rights crisis since its drafting in the Patriot Act in the post-9/11 era. We have a huge amount of problems with warrantless surveillance and wiretapping against American civilians. And we need to do our job to make sure that their rights— Question: What about the consequences? I mean, your home state was hit by 9/11. AOC: Of course, we want to make sure that we’re prioritizing national security. But we also have to be a check on the use of that excuse of national security to invade and to violate the civil rights of everyday Americans who have a baked-in constitutional ability to conduct their lives with privacy and dignity.
1:01

AOC: FISA has been a constitutional civil rights crisis since its drafting in the Patriot Act in the post-9/11 era. We have a huge amount of problems with warrantless surveillance and wiretapping against American civilians. And we need to do our job to make sure that their rights— Question: What about the consequences? I mean, your home state was hit by 9/11. AOC: Of course, we want to make sure that we’re prioritizing national security. But we also have to be a check on the use of that excuse of national security to invade and to violate the civil rights of everyday Americans who have a baked-in constitutional ability to conduct their lives with privacy and dignity.

Acyn

260,917 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee
1:14

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee

Patrick McGreal

11,855 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Keep calling, writing, and speaking out. Republicans are in the middle of trying to pass Trump's big bill, but it's not a done deal. They know it's a bad bill, and we need to convince just four of them to stand with working families. If we can do that, we can stop this thing.
1:23

Keep calling, writing, and speaking out. Republicans are in the middle of trying to pass Trump's big bill, but it's not a done deal. They know it's a bad bill, and we need to convince just four of them to stand with working families. If we can do that, we can stop this thing.

Captain Mark Kelly

93,055 просмотров • 1 год назад

Banks and Paper Bitcoin: “We don't want that centralization. It's not a victory. It's not what we are here for. We're here to replace these guys. We don't need them. They came to this kicking and screaming after a decade of making fun of us. They are not here because they like this. They're here because we beat them year after year after year after year for a decade. We said, "We have the best performing asset in the last 100 years and you're not allowing people to do it." They didn't come here for cypherpunk values. They came here to grift and make a buck. They don't care about our values. They're not a victory. They need us more than we need them. Personally, I recommend that everybody tell them to go pound sand and go and take self-custody and self-sovereignty and replace them, grind them into the dust. That's what we were supposed to do with this industry.”
0:44

Banks and Paper Bitcoin: “We don't want that centralization. It's not a victory. It's not what we are here for. We're here to replace these guys. We don't need them. They came to this kicking and screaming after a decade of making fun of us. They are not here because they like this. They're here because we beat them year after year after year after year for a decade. We said, "We have the best performing asset in the last 100 years and you're not allowing people to do it." They didn't come here for cypherpunk values. They came here to grift and make a buck. They don't care about our values. They're not a victory. They need us more than we need them. Personally, I recommend that everybody tell them to go pound sand and go and take self-custody and self-sovereignty and replace them, grind them into the dust. That's what we were supposed to do with this industry.”

Bruce Fenton

95,074 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад