Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

FLOCK THIS! When those in power cannot defend their actions, they attempt to discredit the people asking questions. During COVID, skeptics were called conspiracy theorists. Now, citizens questioning mass surveillance are being labeled extremists and terrorists. A free nation requires honest debate, complete transparency, and citizens who have the...

84,349 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Gerry Adams in a recent interview said: “We all have to have a very assertive opposition to the far right or to the right generally.” Listen carefully to the language being This creates a false choice: either you support current immigration policies, or you are placed in the “far right” category. But questioning the scale of immigration, rapid demographic change, pressure on housing or the capacity of public services is not the same as blaming immigrants. No one is saying immigrants specifically are the problem, Gerry. The debate is about the decisions made by politicians, the policies, the planning and whether governments are putting the interests of the people they represent first. When public services are already struggling, asking whether they can cope with increased demand is a legitimate democratic question. A democracy depends on debate. Questioning immigration policy, borders, economic policy or aspects of progressive politics are legitimate views. Dismissing people with labels instead of answering their concerns is an attempt to create a culture where people feel they cannot speak openly. “At a certain intellectual level.” That comes across as incredibly dismissive. Just say what you mean: people who disagree are either racist, “far right” or not intelligent enough to understand. That is not how you build trust. The irony is that while some speak about unity, people from different backgrounds who were once divided are now finding common ground on issues affecting their communities. A united Ireland cannot be built by telling certain people their concerns are unacceptable. There is no unlimited right to move to any country of your choice. Countries have a right to control their borders and decide who enters, lives and works there…while still protecting those genuinely fleeing persecution. The real question is not about blaming immigrants. It is about asking whether political decisions are serving ordinary people. A united Ireland should mean unity among its people — not unity against those who question the direction of travel.

Melissa Ciummei

15,022 просмотров • 1 месяц назад